Continuous Toxicity Monitoring Research Articles

Liver-on-a-Chip Integrated with Label-Free Optical Biosensors for Rapid and Continuous Monitoring of Drug-Induced Toxicity.

Drug toxicity assays using conventional 2D static cultures and animal studies have limitations preventing the translation of potential drugs to the clinic. The recent development of organs-on-a-chip platforms provides promising alternatives for drug toxicity/screening assays. However, most studies conducted with these platforms only utilize single endpoint results, which do not provide real-time/ near real-time information. Here, a versatile technology is presented that integrates a 3Dliver-on-a-chip with a label-free photonic crystal-total internal reflection (PC-TIR) biosensor for rapid and continuous monitoring of the status of cells. This technology can detect drug-induced liver toxicity by continuously monitoring the secretion rates and levels of albumin and glutathione S-transferase α (GST-α) of a 3D liver on-a-chip model treated with Doxorubicin. The PC-TIR biosensor is based on a one-step antibody functionalization with high specificity and a detection range of 21.7ngmL-1 to 7.83 x 103ngmL-1 for albumin and 2.20ngmL-1 to 7.94 x 102ngmL-1 for GST-α. This approach provides critical advantages for the early detection of drug toxicity and improved temporal resolution to capture transient drug effects. The proposed proof-of-concept study introduces a scalable and efficient plug-in solution for organ-on-a-chip technologies, advancing drug development and in vitro testing methods by enabling timely and accurate toxicity assessments.

Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Early Detection of Cardiotoxicity Induced by Cancer Therapies.

The significant progress in cancer treatment, including chemotherapy, immunotherapy, radiotherapy, and combination therapies, has led to higher long-term survival rates in cancer patients, while the cardiotoxicity caused by cancer treatment has become increasingly prominent. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is a non-invasive comprehensive imaging modality that provides not only anatomical information, but also tissue characteristics and cardiometabolic and energetic assessment, leading to its increased use in the early identification of cardiotoxicity, and is of major importance in improving the survival rate of cancer patients. This review focused on CMR techniques, including myocardial strain analysis, T1 mapping, T2 mapping, and extracellular volume fraction (ECV) calculation in the detection of early myocardial injury induced by cancer therapies. We summarized the existing studies and ongoing clinical trials using CMR for the assessment of subclinical ventricular dysfunction and myocardial changes at the tissue level. The main focus was to explore the potential of clinical and preclinical CMR techniques for continuous non-invasive monitoring of myocardial toxicity associated with cancer therapy.

Trial in progress: A phase 1, multicenter, open-label, dose-exploration and dose-expansion study evaluating the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of AMG650 in subjects with advanced solid tumors.

TPS5600 Background: KIF18A is a mitotic kinesin motor protein that regulates chromosome positioning during cell division and is overexpressed in a subset of human cancers. TP53 mutant unstable aneuploid cancer cells with chromosomal instability (CIN) features are dependent on KIF18A motor activity to prevent lethal multipolar cell division. Preclinical data demonstrate that treatment with AMG 650; an oral, first in class, selective small molecule inhibitor of KIF18A may be safe and tolerable. We are conducting a first-in-human phase 1 study with AMG 650 in adult subjects with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors with TP53MUT, triple negative breast cancer (TNBC), high grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) or serous like endometrial cancers and other solid tumors. Methods: In this phase 1, multicentric, dose escalation and dose expansion study we evaluate the safety and tolerability of AMG 650 monotherapy in patients with advanced/metastatic solid tumors (NCT04293094). The main objective is to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and/or recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) based on emerging safety, efficacy, and pharmacodynamics (PD) data prior to reaching the MTD. Key inclusion criteria include the presence of measurable disease and diagnosis of advanced/metastatic triple negative breast cancer (TNBC), high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC), serous-like endometrial cancer or other solid tumors with documented TP53 mutations. In the dose expansion phase, participants with locally advanced or metastatic TNBC or HGSOC will be treated with the preliminary RP2D identified from the dose exploration part of the study. Primary endpoints include the incidence of Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs),Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Treatment-related Adverse Events and the evaluation of the number of participants who experience a clinically significant change from baseline in vital signs, electrocardiogram and laboratory tests parameters. Secondary endpoints include Objective Response Rate, Duration of Response, Progression-free Survival, Clinical Benefit Rate, Time to Response, Time to Progression, Overall Survival (OS), Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of AMG 650, Time to Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of AMG 650 as well as Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve (AUC) Over the Dosing Interval for AMG 650. Continuous monitoring of toxicity is conducted. The study began enrolling pts in March 2020 and is ongoing. For more information, please contact Amgen Medical Information: medinfo@amgen.com Clinical trial information: NCT04293094.

A phase 1b study of nivolumab in patients with autoimmune disorders and advanced malignancies (AIM-NIVO).

TPS2676 Background: Nivolumab is an anti-PD1 monoclonal antibody approved for treatment of an increasing number of solid tumors and hematological malignancies. However, patients (pts) with history of autoimmune disorders are excluded from the majority of clinical trials testing immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) such as anti-PD1/anti-PD-L1 antibodies. Consequently, the risks of flare ups, worsening of pre-existing autoimmune disorders or risk of de-novo immune related adverse events (irAEs) in pts with dysfunctional immune systems and tumor types who otherwise stand to benefit from ICI therapy are largely unknown, posing a challenge for oncologists. We are conducting a phase Ib study to test the hypothesis that nivolumab can be safely administered to pts with varying severity of Dermatomyositis, Systemic Sclerosis, Rheumatoid Arthritis, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, Inflammatory Bowel Disease, Multiple Sclerosis and other autoimmune disorders (AIM-Nivo). Methods: AIM-Nivo is an open-label, multi-center ongoing phase Ib study with nivolumab 480mg IV every 28 days in pts with autoimmune diseases and advanced malignancies (NCT03816345). The study has autoimmune disease-specific cohorts overseen by a multidisciplinary group of experts. The primary objective is to assess the overall safety and toxicity profile of nivolumab in pts with autoimmune disorders and advanced malignancies. Secondary objectives are to evaluate the antitumor efficacy; the impact of nivolumab on the autoimmune disease severity indices; and to explore potential biomarkers of response, resistance, or toxicity for each of the autoimmune disease-specific cohorts. Key overall inclusion criteria include age ≥18 years, histologically confirmed advanced or metastatic malignancies in which ICI are approved or have shown clinical activity. Key overall exclusion criteria include prior therapy with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies. Specific eligibility criteria are defined for each disease-specific cohort. For each autoimmune disorder, severity level of the disease as defined by disease-specific severity indices will be assessed, and up to a total of 12 pts will be included in each disease cohort at each severity level (max 36 pts per cohort). Primary endpoints are dose-limiting toxicities, adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs. Continuous monitoring of toxicity will be conducted. Key secondary endpoints are best objective response per RECIST1.1; progression free and overall survival; and cohort specific tumor tissue, blood, and non-tumor tissue-based biomarkers. The AIM-Nivo trial opened in May 2019 and is enrolling pts through the National Cancer Institute Experimental Therapeutics Clinical Trials Network (ETCTN), Early Drug Development Opportunity Program (EDDOP), and Create Access to Targeted Cancer Therapy for Underserved Populations (CATCH-UP) sites. Clinical trial information: NCT03816345.

Phase 1/2 study of eprenetapopt (APR-246) in combination with pembrolizumab in patients with solid tumor malignancies.

TPS3161 Background: The p53 pathway has been implicated in antitumor immunity, including antigen presentation and T-cell proliferation. Loss of p53 function can increase resistance to immunotherapy across many tumor types. Eprenetapopt (eprenet) is a small molecule that stabilizes the folded structure of p53, resulting in activation of mutant p53 and stabilization of wild-type (WT) p53. It also targets the cellular redox homeostasis, resulting in induction of apoptosis in tumor cells. In vivo, mice carrying supernumerary copies of the TP53 gene harbor a pro-inflammatory tumor microenvironment, an effect recapitulated in TP53 normal-copy mice treated with eprenetapopt. Combining eprenetapopt and anti-PD1 or anti-CTLA4 therapy resulted in enhanced tumor growth inhibition and improved survival in TP53 WT mice inoculated with B16 melanoma and MC38 colon adenocarcinoma cells . Based on these results, we hypothesized that eprenet-induced p53 stabilization may augment response to immunotherapy. To test this hypothesis, we are conducting a phase 1b/2 study of eprenet in combination with pembrolizumab (eprenet+pembro) in pts with solid tumors. Methods: The primary objectives are to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) and to assess the safety and tolerability of eprenet+pembro in pts with advanced solid tumors. The secondary objectives are to estimate the anti-tumor activity and to describe the pharmacokinetics of the combination. Exploratory objectives include assessing predictive and pharmacodynamic markers of response. The study includes a safety lead-in with a 3+3 dose de-escalation design for pts with advanced solid tumors with known tumor TP53 mutation status ( TP53 WT is acceptable) (max 18 pts), followed by expansion cohorts in pts with NSCLC, gastric/GEJ and urothelial cancer (max 100 pts). In expansion, pts with urothelial and gastric cancers must be naïve to anti-PD-1/ L1 therapy. Eprenet is given IV once daily on Days 1–4 while pembro is administered on Day 3 of each 21-day cycle. The RP2D of eprenet+pembro is considered the dose at which ≤ 1 of 6 pts in a cohort has a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). Primary endpoints are occurrence of DLTs, adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs with eprenet+pembro. Key secondary endpoints are best objective response, progression free survival and overall survival. Exploratory endpoints include gene mutations by next generation sequencing (including TP53), mRNA expression, multiplex immunohistochemistry and transcriptomics, multiplex flow cytometry on peripheral blood mononuclear cells and cytokines in serum. Continuous monitoring of toxicity will be conducted. The trial opened in May 2020 and is actively enrolling patients. Clinical trial information: NCT04383938.

Multicenter phase I/II trial of encorafenib with and without binimetinib in combination with nivolumab and low-dose ipilimumab in metastatic BRAF-mutant melanoma.

TPS9596 Background: Targeted therapy (BRAF + MEK inhibitors) and immunotherapy (anti-PD1 + anti-CTLA4) have improved overall survival for metastatic or unresectable BRAFV600E/Kmutant melanoma. Whereas targeted therapy has a high response rate, immunotherapy may deliver longer term disease control for a larger number of patients. Despite these treatments, patients with high risk metastatic melanoma such as those with brain or liver metastases, elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and bulky disease have inferior treatment outcomes with current therapies. A BRAF+MEK+PDL1 regimen has recently emerged however the role for this treatment remains unclear. Several recent trials combining MEK inhibition and immunotherapy have failed possibly because MEK inhibition can compromise T cell activation. Meanwhile the addition of CTLA4 blockade to PD1 inhibition appears to disproportionately benefit patients with non-T cell-inflamed tumors and potentially high-risk disease. For patients with high risk BRAF-mutant metastatic melanoma, further investigation of BRAF/MEK targeted and PD-1/CTLA-4 directed immunotherapy combination strategies remains a priority. Methods: This is an open label, multi-site, Phase 1/2 study of encorafenib (Enco) +/- binimetinib (Bini) + nivolumab (Nivo) + ipilimumab (Ipi) for the treatment of patients with unresectable or metastatic BRAF-mutated melanoma in high-risk cohorts (NCT04655157). An initial regimen confirming Phase I approach will be pursued on two schedules concurrently, with patients accruing equally to each group. Group 1 will receive 3mg/kg Nivo, and 1 mg/kg Ipi and 300mg Enco (12 participants, triple therapy) and Group 2 will receive 3mg/kg Nivo and 1mg/kg Ipi and 450mg Enco and 45mg Bini, (12 participants, quadruple therapy). Dose limiting toxicity (DLT) will be evaluated weeks 1-6. A recommended Phase II regimen (RP2R) [either triple or quadruple therapy] will be carried forward into two high risk metastatic disease cohort expansions of 30 participants each. Cohort 1 will include patients with symptomatic brain metastases, while cohort 2 will include patients with elevated LDH as well as either liver metastases OR bulky visceral disease (sum of longest diameters > 44mm). Patients meeting criteria for cohorts 1 and 2 will be placed in cohort 1. Patients with symptomatic brain metastases will be included with an ECOG up to 2 and on ≤ 4mg of dexamethasone or equivalent. Continuous Bayesian toxicity monitoring will be used throughout to monitor DLT. Pre and on-treatment tumor biopsies will assess changes in the tumor microenvironment while peripheral blood ctDNA and T cell Ki67% changes will assess early response and immune activation during triplet and quadruplet therapy. Clinical trial information: NCT04655157.

Encorafenib and binimetinib with or without nivolumab in treating patients with metastatic radioiodine refractory BRAF V600 mutant thyroid cancer.

TPS6085 Background: Differentiated thyroid cancer is the most common endocrine malignancy and has a high frequency of actionable molecular aberrations including BRAF V600E mutations (45%), RET fusions (10%), and NTRK fusions ( < 2%). FDA approved systemic therapies for metastatic radioiodine refractory differentiated thyroid cancer (RR-DTC) include multikinase inhibitors (Lenvatinib and sorafenib), NTRK inhibitors (larotrectinib and entrectinib for NTRK fusion+ cancers), and RET inhibitors (selpercatinib and pralsetinib for RET fusion+ cancers). Previous phase II clinical trials showed clinical efficacy with first and second generation BRAF inhibitors in patients with BRAF mutant RR-DTC. BRAF inhibitors have not yet been FDA approved for treatment of BRAF mutant RR-DTC. Effective therapeutic options for patients with BRAF mutant RR-DTC remains an important unmet clinical need. BRAF mutant thyroid cancers often show elevated expression of PD-L1. Additionally, BRAF inhibition results in increased expression of PD-L1 in thyroid cancer. This clinical trial seeks to evaluate the safety and efficacy of encorafenib plus binimetinib with or without nivolumab in patients with BRAF mutant metastatic RR-DTC. Encorafenib and binimetinib are highly selective and potent oral inhibitors of BRAF and MEK, respectively. Nivolumab is a potent inhibitor of the immune co-inhibitory receptor programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1). Methods: This is a phase II, single institution, open-label, randomized clinical trial evaluating the combinations of (Arm 1) encorafenib 450 mg/day + binimetinib 45 mg twice daily and (Arm 2) encorafenib 450 mg/day + binimetinib 45 mg twice daily + nivolumab 480 mg I.V. every 4 weeks in patients with metastatic BRAF mutant RR-DTC. The trial will enroll 20 patients in each arm and treatment will be given in 28 day cycles for up to 2 years. Eligible patients must have metastatic/unresectable BRAF mutant RR-DTC, an ECOG performance status of 0-1 and adequate bone marrow, liver and kidney function. Patients with CNS metastases are included if the metastases have been treated and remained stable or are asymptomatic and ≤10 mm in diameter. Patients may be systemic therapy naïve or have previously been treated with multikinase inhibitors. Prior therapy with BRAF, MEK or immune checkpoint inhibitors is exclusionary. The primary endpoint is confirmed objective response rate (ORR) determined by RECIST v1.1 with restaging imaging every 12 weeks. Secondary endpoints include progression free survival, overall survival, and safety/tolerability (CTCAE v5.0). Arms 1 and 2 will be evaluated independently and are not powered for direct comparison. The trial design includes continuous toxicity monitoring with a Pocock-type stopping boundary. This clinical trial is in progress and 3 patients have been enrolled. Clinical trial information: NCT04061980.

A phase 2 study of belinostat and SGI-110 (guadecitabine) for the treatment of unresectable and metastatic conventional chondrosarcoma.

TPS11578 Background: Conventional chondrosarcoma (cCS) accounts for ̃25% of primary bone cancers and is the second most common primary bone tumor after osteosarcoma. Surgical resection is the primary treatment for localized disease. No FDA approved therapy exists for advanced disease and chemotherapy has marginal efficacy with ORR < 12%. IDH1/2 mutation is seen in 50% of cases. Epigenetic dysregulation is central to oncogenesis in both IDH1/2 mutant and wild-type CS. Pre-clinical studies from our group show that combination treatment with HDAC and DNMT inhibitors is significantly more effective at suppressing the growth of CS models in vitro and in vivo compared to either therapy alone. The combination regimen mediates anti-tumor effects on CS by induction of apoptosis, induction of tumor suppressor genes (eg. E-cadherin), the induction of interferon responsive genes (eg. IRF7, OASL, ISG15, DDX58) and reversal of global hypomethylated state. Based on these findings we have designed a phase 2 clinical trial with an HDAC inhibitor (belinostat) and a DNMT inhibitor (guadecitabine) in patients with advanced cCS. Methods: NCI # 10330 is a single-arm, multi-center, Simon 2-stage, phase 2 clinical trial evaluating belinostat and guadecitabine in patients with advanced cCS. Eligible patients will have biopsy proven cCS which is measurable by RECIST v1.1 and amenable to biopsy, ECOG PS ≤ 2, any number of prior treatments (including none). Patients will receive guadecitabine 45 mg/m2 SC followed by belinostat 1000 mg/m2 IV once daily on days 1-5 of a 28-day cycle. A safety lead-in and continuous toxicity monitoring rule will be applied. The primary endpoint will be ORR. Since chemotherapy is associated with an ORR of 8-12% and targeted agents have shown an ORR of 0% in cCS, we will consider an ORR of 8% as inactive while an ORR of 28% will suggest promising activity. A Simon 2-stage design is employed. The design calls for 26 patients. If ≥ 2 responses are observed among 13 patients in stage I, the study will proceed to full accrual. If ≥ 5 responses are seen among 26 patients, the study treatment is considered promising. This design has 85% power with α of 0.054 to test for a response rate of 8% vs 28%. Secondary objectives include safety, tolerability and PFS. All patients will undergo pre-treatment and on-treatment tumor biopsies. Paired tissue will be used for correlative analysis including: 1) whole exome sequencing/RNAseq to evaluate changes in gene expression in response to treatment, 2) multiplex IHC to interrogate the effect of combination therapy on tumor immune microenvironment and 3) a global DNA methylation assay to better understand the changes in epigenetic landscape in response to treatment. This study is open throughout the ETCTN (NCT04340843). Six of the planned 26 patients in the safety lead-in have been enrolled without DLT. Further accrual is on hold pending completion of the safety lead-in. Clinical trial information: 04340843.

Abstract PD2-03: Treatment exposure and discontinuation in the PALLAS trial: PALbociclib CoLlaborative Adjuvant Study of palbociclib with adjuvant endocrine therapy for HR+/HER2- early breast cancer

Abstract Background:Adherence to and tolerability of oral agents for the treatment of hormone receptor positive (HR+) breast cancer in the adjuvant setting may be challenging and can limit drug exposure. Palbociclib (P) is an oral CDK4/6 inhibitor; P in combination with endocrine therapy (ET) has demonstrated efficacy in HR+/HER-2 negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (MBC). The global PALLAS study (NCT02513394) was designed to determine if the addition of P to adjuvant ET improves outcomes over ET alone in early breast cancer. The goal of this analysis is to describe P exposure and discontinuation in PALLAS, and explore any impact on study endpoints. Methods:Pts with stage II-III HR+/HER2- disease were randomized to receive 2 years of P (starting dose 125 mg daily, 3 weeks on, 1 week off) in combination with adjuvant ET (Arm A) or ET alone (Arm B). The primary objective was to compare invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) between arms; secondary endpoints included safety, quality of life, adherence, and translational science. Dose adjustments were defined per protocol in the setting of emergent toxicity. Continuous monitoring of toxicity, dose modifications, and early discontinuations was performed throughout the trial. Statistical analysis included tabulation of dose levels/reductions and reasons for treatment discontinuation, as well as landmark analysis comparing iDFS between those receiving > 12 months (mo) vs < 12 mo of P. Ongoing analyses include exploration of relative dose intensity and modeling of P dose intensity/duration and impact on iDFS. Results:A total of 5760 pts were randomized; 83% had received prior chemotherapy; 68% initiated aromatase inhibitor and 33% tamoxifen, with or without ovarian suppression. Grade 3/4 neutropenia was more common in Arm A vs B (62% vs 0.4%); febrile neutropenia was uncommon (1%). Other all-grade adverse events (AEs) more common in Arm A included other hematologic toxicity, fatigue, upper respiratory infection, nausea, diarrhea, and alopecia. A total of 55% of pts required P dose reduction to 100mg, and 34% to 75 mg, at some point during treatment. At a median follow-up of 23.7 mo at the second interim analysis, no significant difference in iDFS was observed between the arms (3-year iDFS of 87.9% vs 88.4%, HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.76, 1.15); consequently, pts in Arm A stopped P, and all pts moved to long-term follow-up. At time of data cut-off, 32% had completed the planned 2 years of P, 26% were still receiving P, and 42% had discontinued P prematurely. P discontinuation was 18% at 6 mo, 30% at 12 mo, 38% at 18 mo, and 45% projected at 24 mo. A total of 27% of Arm A pts (770 of 2840) discontinued therapy due to AEs, primarily neutropenia (460, 16%) and fatigue (71, 3%). Other reasons for P discontinuation included non-compliance (128, 5%), recurrent disease or second malignancy (104, 4%), or withdrawal of consent (100, 3%). Last observed dose level was 125mg, 100mg, and 75mg for 45%, 22%, and 33% pts, respectively. Among those discontinuing due to AEs, dose level at time of discontinuation was 75mg for 62%, suggesting some discontinuations occurred without maximum dose reduction. Pts who received > 12 mo of P had a 2-year iDFS of 96.6%; those receiving <12 mo had 2-year iDFS of 95.7% (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.55-1.34). Conclusions:An early analysis of PALLAS has demonstrated that 2 years of adjuvant P in combination with adjuvant ET did not improve iDFS when compared with ET alone in pts with HR+/HER2- breast cancer. While 2 years of adjuvant P was feasible for the majority of pts, 42% discontinued P early, primarily for AEs. Further data examining drug discontinuations and relationships between drug exposure and clinical outcomes will be presented, expanding upon initial point estimates suggestive of a possible explanation of trial results. Citation Format: Erica L. Mayer, Christian Fesl, Amylou Dueck, Michael Gnant, Angela DeMichele, on behalf of the PALLAS study team. Treatment exposure and discontinuation in the PALLAS trial: PALbociclib CoLlaborative Adjuvant Study of palbociclib with adjuvant endocrine therapy for HR+/HER2- early breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD2-03.

Abstract CT249: A phase 1b study of nivolumab in patients with autoimmune disorders and advanced malignancies (AIM-NIVO)

Abstract Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) such as anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies have rapidly become a pivotal approach to cancer therapy. Nivolumab is an anti-PD1 antibody approved for treatment of melanoma, lung, renal cell, head and neck squamous, urothelial and increasing number of other solid and hematological malignancies. However, patients with history of autoimmune disorders are excluded from the majority of clinical trials testing ICI. Consequently, the risks of flare ups and worsening of pre-existing autoimmune disorders in patients with tumor types who otherwise stand to benefit from ICI therapy are largely unknown, posing a challenge for oncologists. We are conducting a phase Ib study to test the hypothesis that nivolumab can be safely administered to patients with varying severity of Dermatomyositis, Systemic Sclerosis, Rheumatoid Arthritis, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, Inflammatory Bowel Disease, Multiple Sclerosis and others autoimmune disorders (AIM-Nivo). Methods: AIM-Nivo is an open-label, multi-center ongoing phase Ib study with nivolumab 480mg IV every 28 days in patients with autoimmune diseases and advanced or metastatic solid tumors. The study has autoimmune disease-specific cohorts overseen by a multidisciplinary group of experts. The primary objective is to assess the overall safety and toxicity profile of nivolumab in patients with autoimmune disorders and advanced or metastatic solid tumors. Secondary objectives are to evaluate the antitumor efficacy, the impact of nivolumab on the autoimmune disease severity indices, and to explore potential biomarkers of response, resistance or toxicity. Key overall inclusion criteria include age ≥18 years, histologically confirmed advanced or metastatic solid tumors in which ICI are approved or have shown clinical activity, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0-2. Key overall exclusion criteria include prior therapy with an anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies. Specific eligibility criteria are defined for each disease-specific cohort. For each autoimmune disorder, severity level of the disease as defined by disease-specific severity indices will be assessed, and up to a total of 12 patients will be included in each disease cohort at each severity level. Primary endpoints are dose-limiting toxicities defined for each autoimmune disease-specific cohort, adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs. Continuous monitoring of toxicity will be conducted. Key secondary endpoints are best objective response, progression free and overall survival and cohort specific tumor tissue, blood and non-tumor tissue-based biomarkers. The AIM-Nivo trial opened in May 2019 and is currently enrolling patients in the participating sites through the National Cancer Institute Experimental Therapeutics Clinical Trials Network (ETCTN). Clinical trial information: NCT03816345. Citation Format: Ecaterina E. Ileana Dumbrava, Maria Suarez-Almazor, Jeane Painter, Tanner M. Johanns, Michael L. Dougan, Laura Cappelli, Yinghong Wang, Clifton Bingham, Sarthak Gupta, Blake M. Warner, Osama Rahma, Jarushka Naidoo, Patrick A. Ott, David A. Hafler, Harriet Kluger, Arezou Khosroshahi, Rafeh Naqash, Lorinda Chung, Tamiko R. Katsumoto, Shivaani Kummar, Hussein Tawbi, Elad Sharon. A phase 1b study of nivolumab in patients with autoimmune disorders and advanced malignancies (AIM-NIVO) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr CT249.

A phase Ib study of nivolumab in patients with autoimmune disorders and advanced malignancies (AIM-NIVO).

TPS3158 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) such as anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies have become a pivotal approach to cancer therapy. Nivolumab is an anti-PD1 antibody approved for an increasing number of solid tumors and hematological malignancies. However, patients (pts) with history of autoimmune disorders are excluded from the majority of clinical trials testing ICI. Consequently, the risks of flares and worsening of pre-existing autoimmune disorders in pts with tumor types who otherwise stand to benefit from ICI therapy are largely unknown, posing a challenge for oncologists. We are conducting a phase Ib study to test the hypothesis that nivolumab can be safely administered to pts with varying severity of Dermatomyositis, Systemic Sclerosis, Rheumatoid Arthritis, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, Inflammatory Bowel Disease, Multiple Sclerosis, Sjögren's Syndrome and Other Autoimmune Disorders (AIM-Nivo). Methods: AIM-Nivo is an open-label, multi-center ongoing phase Ib study with nivolumab 480mg IV every 28 days in pts with autoimmune diseases and advanced malignancies (NCT03816345). The study has autoimmune disease-specific cohorts overseen by a multidisciplinary group of experts. The primary objective is to assess the overall safety and toxicity profile of nivolumab in pts with autoimmune disorders and advanced malignancies. Secondary objectives are to evaluate the antitumor efficacy, the impact of nivolumab on the autoimmune disease severity indices, and to explore potential biomarkers of response, resistance or toxicity. Key overall inclusion criteria include age ≥18 years, histologically confirmed advanced malignancies in which ICI are approved or have shown clinical activity. Key overall exclusion criteria include prior therapy with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies. Specific eligibility criteria are defined for each disease-specific cohort. For each autoimmune disorder, severity level of the disease as defined by disease-specific severity indices will be assessed, and up to a total of 12 pts will be included in each disease cohort at each severity level. Primary endpoints are dose-limiting toxicities, adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs. Continuous monitoring of toxicity will be conducted. Key secondary endpoints are best objective response, progression free and overall survival and cohort specific tumor tissue, blood and non-tumor tissue-based biomarkers. The AIM-Nivo trial opened in May 2019 and is enrolling pts through the National Cancer Institute Experimental Therapeutics Clinical Trials Network (ETCTN). Clinical trial information: NCT03816345 .

Patterns of Phenol in a Continuous Toxicity Monitoring System Using Bioluminescent Bacteria

The purpose of this study is to evaluate effect of phenol toxicity of Vibrio fischeri using MicroTox Ⓡ CTM. A continuous flow system for biomonitoring tool has been used to assess the toxicity of phenol. The bioluminescence inhibition of different dillutions of phenol (1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0 mg/L) with deionized water for reference was evaluated from 3.5 to 97.4% and the EC20 and EC50 from inhibition curve were estimated in 1.7 and 2.2 mg/L, respectively. Meanwhile, the bioluminescence inhibition of mixtures of phenol (2.0, 3.0, 5.0, 7.0 mg/L) with effluent wastewater for reference was evaluated from 5.4 to 99.2% and the EC20 and EC50 from inhibition curve were estimated in 2.9 and 4.4 mg/L, respectively. Using MicroTox Ⓡ CTM provides a simple, rapid and sensitive method for accessing the toxic risks posed by phenol to aquatic ecosystems and has practical applications for municipal and industrial wastewater management and screening of contaminants in fresh water streams and lakes. Key words: Bioassay, Bioluminescent Bacteria, Vibrio fischeri, Biosensor, Phenol

Evaluation of a novel automated water analyzer for continuous monitoring of toxicity and chemical parameters in municipal water supply

A novel tool, the DAMTA analyzer (Device for Analytical Monitoring and Toxicity Assessment), designed for fully automated toxicity measurements based on luminescent bacteria as well as for concomitant determination of chemical parameters, was developed and field-tested. The instrument is a robotic water analyzer equipped with a luminometer and a spectrophotometer, integrated on a thermostated reaction plate which contains a movable carousel with 80 cuvettes. Acute toxicity is measured on-line using a wild type Photobacterium phosphoreum strain with measurable bioluminescence and unaltered sensitivity to toxicants lasting up to ten days. The EC50 values of reference compounds tested were consistent with A. fischeri and P. phosphoreum international standards and comparable to previously published data. Concurrently, a laboratory trial demonstrated the feasibility of use of the analyzer for the determination of nutrients and metals in parallel to the toxicity measurements. In a prolonged test, the system was installed only in toxicity mode at the premises of the World Fair “Expo Milano-2015″, a high security site to ensure the quality of the supplied drinking water. The monitoring program lasted for six months during which ca. 2400 toxicity tests were carried out; the results indicated a mean non-toxic outcome of −5.5 ± 6.2%. In order to warrant the system's robustness in detecting toxic substances, Zn was measured daily with highly reproducible inhibition results, 70.8 ± 13.6%. These results assure that this novel toxicity monitor can be used as an early warning system for protection of drinking water sources from emergencies involving low probability/high impact contamination events in source water or treated water.

Bioluminescent liquid light guide pad biosensor for indoor air toxicity monitoring.

Indoor air pollution became a recent concern found to be oftentimes worse than outdoor air quality. We developed a tool that is cheap and simple and enables continuous monitoring of air toxicity. It is a biosensor with both a nondisposable (monitor) and disposable (calcium alginate pads with immobilized bacteria) elements. Various parameters to enhance its signal have been tested (including the effect of the pad's orientation, it's exposure to either temperature or time with the air toxicant analyte, and various concentrations thereof). Lastly, the sensor has demonstrated its ability to sense the presence of chemicals in a real, indoor environment. This is the first step in the creation of a sensitive and simple operative tool that may be used in different indoor environments.

On a Type of Probability Stopping Rule for Toxicity Study

In early phase cancer clinical trials where toxicity events follow independent and identical Bernoulli distributions indexed by patients, the Bayesian stopping rule has been used for continuous monitoring of toxicity along with an affordable maximum sample size (N). This article studies some properties of an heuristic procedure where the trial will stop at the first time that the posterior probability that the toxicity rate (p) is greater than a threshold (η) is greater than certain probability threshold (τ). Specifically, we study the pattern formed by stopping times and regions, recursive stopping probability computation, and toxicity rate estimation. Some relevant theoretical results are given. The presented results are potentially useful for guiding toxicity clinical trial designs.

A phase I study of 1-methyl-D-tryptophan in patients with advanced malignancies.

2501 Background: The indoleamine 2, 3 dioxygenase pathway (IDO) can create immune suppression and unresponsiveness to tumor antigens in tumor-bearing hosts. 1-methyl-D-tryptophan (1-MT) is an oral inhibitor of the IDO pathway, currently in development as an immune adjuvant for anti-tumor vaccines and chemotherapy. The primary goal of this trial is to determine the MTD and toxicity for oral 1-MT. Secondary endpoints include response rates, PK, serum tryptophan catabolites, circulating T-reg cells, and C reactive protein (CRP) levels. Methods: This phase I study utilizes a 3+3 design comprised of ten dose levels (200, 300,400,600,800,mg QD, 600, 800,1200,1600,2000mg BID). Inclusion criteria: patients with measurable metastatic solid malignancy, age ≥18, life expectancy >4 months, and adequate organ/marrow function. Exclusion criteria: chemotherapy in the past 3 weeks, untreated brain metastases, active autoimmune disease, or malabsorptive GI disease. Continuous toxicity monitoring early stopping rules were used. Results: At submission, 48 out of the planned 50 patients were accrued. MTD was not reached at 2000mg BID. At 200mg QD dose, 3 patients previously treated with active immunotherapy (ipilimumab, n=2, CD40-mAb, n=1) developed an autoimmune hypophysitis. Since IDO is closely linked to both CTLA-4 and CD40/CD40L pathways this was considered on-target effect. Subsequently, patients with prior immunotherapy were excluded and no additional treatment related G3-5 adverse events were observed. Five patients showed SD>6 months (2 melanoma, 2 sarcoma 1 colon) as well as some mixed responses were seen in some patients including regression of a liver visceral metastases. 1-MT plasma PK AUC and Cmax were proportional with dose. Cmax (~40 μM at 2000mg BID) is at 2.9 hours and the t1/2 is at 10 hours. Elevations in CRP levels and declines in T-reg cell counts were seen across multiple dose levels. Additional correlative data analysis is ongoing. Conclusions: The treatment was well tolerated and orally bioavailable. Biologic activity in terms of prolonged disease stabilization, induction of hypophysitis, and changes in T-reg levels and CRP were observed. Trials combining 1-MT with docetaxel and a dendritic cell vaccine are ongoing.

Operating characteristics of a Simon two‐stage phase II clinical trial design incorporating continuous toxicity monitoring

Phase II clinical trials are usually designed to measure efficacy, but safety is also an important end point. Previous authors recommended a method to monitor toxic events after each patient is enrolled, which is also known as continuously monitoring the toxicity. In this work, we investigate combining the usual Simon two-stage design to monitor response with the continuous toxicity monitoring methodology. Theoretical justification is given for the nominal size, probability of early termination, and average sample size under the null hypothesis of the combined testing procedure. A series of simulations are performed to investigate the performance of the combined procedure.

An evaluation of a Simon 2-Stage phase II clinical trial design incorporating toxicity monitoring

Phase II clinical trials are usually designed to measure efficacy but patient safety is also a very important aspect. Previous authors suggested a methodology that allows one to monitor the cumulative number of toxic events after each patient is treated, which is also known as continuous toxicity monitoring. In this work we describe how to combine the continuous toxicity monitoring methodology with the Simon 2-Stage design for response. Then we investigate through simulation the combined procedure's type I and type II error rates under various combinations of design parameters. We include the underlying relationship between toxicity and response in our examination of the error rates.

Three-Weekly S-1 Monotherapy as First-Line Treatment in Elderly Patients with Recurrent or Metastatic Gastric Cancer

Elderly patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC) have generally been excluded from clinical trials, and there are few data available on the treatment of these patients. The efficacy of palliative S-1 monotherapy as a first-line treatment regimen for elderly patients has not been well elucidated. For this study, 25 AGC patients were enrolled between January 1, 2007 and March 31, 2009; 4 cases were recurrent AGC and 21 cases were metastatic AGC at the time of diagnosis. These patients received S-1 therapy at a dose of 40 mg/m(2) twice daily for 14 days every 3 weeks. All of the patients were older than 70 years. The median follow-up duration, the median progression-free survival, and the overall survival time were 8.7 months (range, 4.9 to 12.5 months), 4.9 months (range, 3.5 to 6.3 months), and 10.8 months (range, 6.6 to 15.0 months), respectively. Grade 3/4 nonhematologic toxicities were rare. Grade 3/4 neutropenia was noted in two patients. The partial response rate was 21.7% and stable disease was observed in 34.8% of the patients. Two patients (8%) died due to chemotherapy-associated toxicity during treatment (septic shock/intracranial hemorrhage). Oral S-1 chemotherapy seems to be effective as a first-line treatment regimen for elderly patients with metastatic or recurrent AGC. However, elderly patients receiving S-1 treatment should undergo continuous toxicity monitoring, since they are highly susceptible to adverse effects.

Automatic biodetector of water toxicity (ABTOW) as a tool for examination of phenol and cyanide contaminated water

We describe an automatic biodetector for continuous monitoring of water toxicity (ABTOW). Construction of the ABTOW is based on natural ability of the biofilm formation to immobilize consortia of nitrifying bacteria (the sensing element) on the open cellular polyurethane foam as the support. Change of rates of oxygen consumption is used as an indicator of biocatalytic activity (nitrification) of the bacteria in response to xenobiotics. Owing to this design the ABTOW features stability long-term use, is inexpensive and simple in operation. The dynamics of ABTOW response is studied in details for phenol and cyanide as model toxins. These data indicate that the sensitivity was 3.5 μM for phenol and 0.19 μM for cyanide, respectively. The magnitudes of toxic effect were proportional to concentration whereas kinetics of the response is an indicator for the mechanism of toxicity. Similar methodology is applied to quantify toxicity of a range of heavy metals, herbicides and oxidative chain inhibitors. One may conclude that the presented biodetector provides a good sensitivity for continuous on-line monitoring of toxicity in water.