Continuous Catheter Research Articles

Emerging Trends in Regional Anesthesia Techniques

Regional anesthesia has become an essential component of modern perioperative care, offering targeted pain relief, reducing opioid consumption, and enhancing recovery. Recent advancements in regional anesthesia techniques, particularly the adoption of ultrasound guidance, the development of novel nerve blocks, and the use of continuous catheter infusions, have significantly improved the precision, efficacy, and safety of these procedures. This article provides a comprehensive review of the emerging trends in regional anesthesia, including the latest techniques, clinical applications, and future directions. The integration of these advancements into clinical practice has the potential to further optimize patient outcomes, reduce perioperative complications, and enhance overall patient satisfaction.

Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Mixed Liposomal Bupivacaine versus Continuous Catheter for Interscalene Block during Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Comparison of Analgesia, Patient Experience, and Cost

BackgroundContinuous interscalene catheters extend analgesia beyond 24 hours but are resource-intensive, while the efficacy of liposomal bupivacaine for single-injection interscalene blocks remains uncertain. The purpose of this investigation was to examine the analgesic efficacy, quality of recovery, and treatment costs between interscalene nerve block using either an indwelling catheter or single shot block using liposomal bupivacaine, in patients undergoing shoulder arthroplasty. MethodsIn this single-center, parallel, unblinded, randomized clinical trial, 83 patients undergoing primary shoulder arthroplasty were assigned to either a continuous interscalene catheter group (n=44) or a single-injection liposomal bupivacaine interscalene block group (n=39). The interscalene catheter group received a 15-20 mL bolus of 0.5% bupivacaine HCl followed by continuous infusion at 8 mL/h for 69 hours. The single-injection interscalene group received 10 mL (133 mg) liposomal bupivacaine with 5 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine HCl. The primary outcome was pain at rest 24 hours post-surgery. Secondary outcomes included pain scores, opioid consumption, complications, quality of recovery, and a time-driven activity-based cost analysis through postoperative day 3. ResultsThere was no significant difference in median pain scores at 24 hours between the continuous interscalene catheter group and the single-injection liposomal bupivacaine group (1.0 [0.0, 2.0] vs. 1.0 [0.0, 3.0]; P=0.433). Comparable analgesia was observed through postoperative day 3, with no differences in opioid consumption or quality of recovery. No serious adverse events were reported; however, 16% of patients in the continuous catheter group experienced dislodgement or leakage. Liposomal bupivacaine was associated with a 28% reduction in costs compared to the continuous catheter approach. ConclusionSingle-injection interscalene block with liposomal bupivacaine provides comparable analgesia to continuous interscalene catheters through postoperative day 3 while offering better value in the perioperative management of shoulder arthroplasty patients.

Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Hip and Pelvic Surgical Procedures: An Educational Focused Review.

Hip disorders in infants and children may result from congenital, infectious, developmental, inflammatory, neoplastic, and traumatic etiologies. Postoperative pain management associated with hip pathologies can be challenging especially due to complex innervation of the hip and surrounding structures. Given the adverse effect profile of systemic opioids, regional anesthesia offers an excellent alternative with more beneficial adverse effect profile. Various peripheral regional anesthetic techniques have been reported with variable results regarding analgesia and differing adverse effect profiles. The pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block is a novel motor-sparing regional anesthetic technique where the local anesthetic agent is deposited in the musculofascial plane between the psoas tendon and the pubic ramus. The main target is the genicular branches of the femoral, obturator, and accessory obturator nerve, which innervate the hip capsule. The anatomy involved with PENG block is reviewed and previous reports of PENG block in pediatric-aged patients, including single shot or continuous catheter techniques, are reviewed.

Continuous peripheral nerve blocks for burn management: a retrospective study of outcomes and complications in 281 burn patients.

There is scarce literature regarding the use of continuous peripheral nerve blocks in acute burn patients, who may be at higher risk for catheter-related complications, including infection. We sought to describe our center's experience and infection rate with continuous perineural catheters in the setting of pain management for patients suffering from burns. A retrospective observational study was performed including all patients admitted to an American Burn Association-verified regional burn center between January 2018 and July 2023 who received a continuous peripheral nerve block for an acute burn injury. There were 281 patients in the study cohort who received 484 perineural catheters. The cohort was 52% men with a median age of 39 years (IQR 30-55). A catheter-associated infection, defined as a clinical diagnosis by the treating physicians requiring the need for treatment with antibiotics or surgical debridement, was identified in six perineural catheters (1.2%, 95% CI 0% to 2.2%) involving six different patients (2.1%, 95% CI 0% to 3.8%). The median total body surface area burned was 5% (IQR 2-9%) and 20% of patients had full-thickness burns. The most commonly used catheters were infraclavicular (49%), popliteal sciatic (29%), femoral (19%), and adductor canal (17%). One-third (33%) of patients did not require operating room debridement as the block provided sufficient analgesia for bedside debridement. The median duration of catheter use was 6 days (IQR 4-8). There were no documented cases of nerve injury or toxicity, vascular injury, or local anesthetic systemic toxicity. In our practice, continuous perineural catheters in the setting of acute burns are associated with an infection rate comparable to other surgical populations.

Septic Hip Arthritis in Children: A Comparison of Arthrocentesis and the Double Luminal Drainage Catheter

Background: Septic hip arthritis in children is an orthopaedic emergency. While the well-established surgical treatment is open arthrotomy, several minimally invasive techniques have been offered as alternatives in recent years. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcome of a continuous double luminal drainage catheter (DLDC) with repeated arthrocentesis, in the treatment of septic hip arthritis in children. Methods: Medical records were retrospectively reviewed for all patients aged 1 to 18 years diagnosed with septic hip arthritis between 2005 and 2020 and treated with either DLDC or arthrocentesis. The clinical outcomes of 17 patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were compared. 8 were treated using DLDC, and 9 were treated by arthrocentesis. All patients had a follow-up period of 12 months after treatment. Results: In the DLDC group, the catheter was inserted continuously, with a median of 4 days. A single aspiration sufficed in 8 of 9 patients. The duration of hospitalization was significantly longer (P = 0.004) in the DLDC group (mean 21.6 SD 10.04 days), compared with the arthrocentesis group (mean 9.2 SD 1.7 days). The median time until patients returned to normal gait was 12 days (range 4 to 110) in the DLDC group, compared with 8 days (range 7 to 14) in the arthrocentesis group. None of the patients required open arthrotomy, and no infection recurrence was observed. Discussion: In conclusion, while both suggested minimally invasive techniques may be safe and efficient in the treatment of septic hip arthritis in children, arthrocentesis is associated with a shorter duration of hospitalization. However, continuous drainage with a DLDC may be a better modality for severe cases. Additional research is needed to determine specific indications, considering the widely accepted benchmark of open arthrotomy. Level of Evidence: III

Continuous Catheter Techniques Versus Single-Injection Nerve Blocks: A Comprehensive Review of Postoperative Pain Management Strategies.

Effective postoperative pain management is crucial for optimizing patient recovery and enhancing surgical outcomes. This review compares two prominent regional anesthesia techniques, continuous catheter techniques and single-injection nerve blocks, focusing on their efficacy, safety, and impact on patient outcomes. Single-injection nerve blocks involve administering a one-time anesthetic dose to a specific nerve or plexus, offering immediate but transient pain relief. In contrast, continuous catheter techniques utilize a catheter to deliver a continuous infusion of anesthetic, providing extended analgesia. The review synthesizes current evidence on the effectiveness of each method, highlighting that single-injection blocks are advantageous for their simplicity and rapid onset but may require supplementary pain management for longer procedures. Continuous catheter techniques, while offering prolonged pain relief, carry risks such as infection and catheter displacement. The comparative analysis of these techniques reveals that both have distinct roles in postoperative care, with choice depending on the surgical procedure and patient needs. Patient satisfaction, recovery times, and overall outcomes are critical factors in determining the optimal pain management strategy. Future research should focus on refining these techniques and exploring innovations to improve patient care and pain management outcomes. This review provides insights for clinicians to make informed decisions about postoperative pain management to enhance patient comfort and recovery.

Adductor Catheter Insertion Through the Knee Arthrotomy: Can This Technique Be as Safe and Effective as Ultrasound-Guided Insertion?

BackgroundEarly postoperative pain following total knee arthroplasty remains challenging. We devised a technique for inserting a continuous catheter intraoperatively in the adductor canal and aimed to compare its efficacy and safety with that of an ultrasound-guided anesthetist-administered continuous catheter. MethodsThis single-center, single-surgeon, prospective, interventional, randomized controlled trial included 330 patients, who were randomized into two groups with similar preoperative status and demographics. There were 18 patients who met the exclusion criteria. Group A (n = 152) received the block from an anesthetist, while group B (n = 160) received the block from the surgeon. Patients had visual analog scale scores, range of motion, maximum ambulation distance, time to straight leg raise, length of stay, and results from a 10-meter walk test, Timed Up and Go test, and a 30-second chair test measured preoperatively and at 6, 12, and 24 hours postoperatively by a physiotherapist and pain nurse blinded to the group assignment. ResultsThe visual analog scale scores at 12 hours postsurgery were significantly lower in group B (0.66) compared to group A (0.77, P = 0.04). Range of motion (supine flexion 43.2 versus 43.1, P = 0.72; sitting flexion 90.0 versus 89.9, P = 0.17), Timed Up and Go test (126.1 versus 136.9, P = 0.9), 10-meter walk test (163.5 versus 165.4, P = 0.7), 30-second chair test (3.7 versus 3.8, P = 0.7), time to active straight leg raise (4.0 versus 4.1, P = 0.3), time to ambulation with walker (4.02 versus 4.05, P = 0.3), and length of stay (1.44 versus 1.39, P = 0.49) showed no significant differences between the groups. No serious complications were reported in either group. ConclusionsWe concluded that this technique was at least as safe and effective as the USG-guided, anesthetist-administered adductor canal catheter.

Impact of a 'Catheter Bundle' on Infection Rates and Economic Costs in the Intensive Care Unit: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Catheter-related infections (CBRSIs) are a widespread problem that increase morbidity and mortality in intensive care unit (ICU) patients and management costs. The main aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of CBRSIs in an intensive care unit following international literature guidelines for managing vascular lines in critically ill patients. These guidelines include changing vascular lines every 7 days, using needle-free devices and port protectors, standardising closed infusion lines, employing chlorhexidine-impregnated dressings, and utilising sutureless devices for catheter securement. This single-centre retrospective observational study was conducted in a general Italian ICU. This study included all eligible patients aged > 1 year who were admitted between January 2018 and December 2022. During the study period, 1240 patients were enrolled, of whom 9 were diagnosed with a CRBSI. The infection rate per 1000 catheters/day was as follows: femorally inserted central catheter, 1.04; centrally inserted central catheter, 0.77; pulmonary arterial catheter 0.71, arterial catheter, 0.1; and peripherally inserted central catheter and continuous veno-venous haemodialysis dialysis catheters equal to 0. No difference in CRBSI was observed between the years included in the study (p = 0.874). The multivariate analysis showed an association between the diagnosis of CBRSI and Nursing Activities Score (per single point increase β = 0.04-95%CI: -0.01-0.09, p = 0.048), reason for ICU admission-trauma (β = 0.77-95%CI: -0.03-1.49, p = 0.039), and use of therapeutic hypothermia (β = 2.06, 95%CI: 0.51-3.20, p < 0.001). Implementing the study protocol revealed a cost of EUR 130.00/patient, equivalent to a daily cost of EUR 15.20 per patient. This study highlights the importance of implementing a catheter care bundle to minimise the risk of CRBSI and the associated costs in the ICU setting. A policy change for infusion set replacement every 7 days has helped to maintain the CRBSI rate below the recommended rate, resulting in significant cost reduction and reduced production of ICU waste.

Local Infiltration Analgesia Is Superior to Regional Nerve Blocks for Total Hip Arthroplasty: Less Falls, Better Mobility, and Same-Day Discharge.

Background: Multimodal analgesia in total hip arthroplasty (THA) provides better pain control, mobility, and reduced side effects compared to monotherapies. Local infiltration analgesia (LIA) and regional nerve blocks (RNBs) are commonly used throughout these protocols. This study aimed to compare these procedures as part of a multimodal analgesia protocol for patients undergoing THA. Materials and Methods: A retrospective review of 1100 consecutive elective primary THAs was performed in 996 patients between June 2018 and December 2021. The RNB consisted of a preoperative continuous femoral nerve catheter and single-shot obturator nerve block, and LIA consisted of the intraoperative infiltration of weight-based bupivacaine. Results: A total of 579 (52.6%) patients received RNB, and 521 (47.4%) received LIA. Mean oral morphine equivalents (OMEs) during the first four hours postoperatively were significantly lower for LIA group (p < 0.001). However, the numeric pain rating scale in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) was similar between groups. Patients with LIA had significantly greater first ambulation distance in the PACU (p < 0.001), higher successful same-day discharge rate (p = 0.029), fewer falls (p = 0.041), and less refill OMEs post-discharge (p < 0.001) than RNB. Conclusions: In the setting of similar pain management between groups and better functional outcomes for LIA, the use of minimally invasive procedures like LIA for pain control following THA is favorable.

Comparison of analgesic efficacy of continuous perineural catheter, liposomal bupivacaine, and dexamethasone as an adjuvant for interscalene block in total shoulder arthroplasty: a triple-blinded randomized controlled trial

BackgroundInterscalene catheters (ISC) are considered as the gold standard for perioperative pain control after total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). Liposomal bupivacaine (LB) for interscalene blocks (ISB) or the addition of dexamethasone to ISBs have both presented as additional options for extended analgesia. We aimed to compare the efficacy of LB to a single shot ISB (SISB) with added dexamethasone to an ISC. We hypothesized that a single injection of LB or an ISB with a dexamethasone will provide non-inferior duration and quality of analgesia compared to ISC. MethodsA single centered triple blinded randomized controlled trial evaluated patients undergoing elective primary TSA. Patients were randomized to 3 groups, Group A (control): 0.5% bupivacaine 15 ml with a rescue catheter left in situ (0.125% bupivacaine infusion), Group B: 0.5% bupivacaine 14 ml with 4mg (1 ml) dexamethasone with a catheter left in situ (saline infusion), Group C: 10 ml of liposomal bupivacaine (133 mg) with 0.5% bupivacaine 5 ml, with a catheter left in situ (saline infusion). The primary outcome was the worst NRS (numeric rating scale) measured on arrival to PACU, 6 hours, 12 hours, 24 hours, and 36 hours postoperatively. Secondary outcomes recorded were time to first analgesic request, intraoperative opioid consumption, total inpatient opioid consumption, arm weakness, arm numbness, time of analgesia duration, time of motor recovery, sensory testing using pinprick on POD1, Q36, Q48, hand strength assessment using dynamometer POD1, Q36, Q48, PACU and hospital length of stay. ResultsWe analyzed 72 patients in 3 groups (Group A 24, group B 24, Group C 24). The pre-surgery physical function scores were similar between groups. The change in postoperative pain was not different among the three groups. All 3 groups demonstrated an increase in the postoperative values, a change that was not statistically significant between groups. Likewise, no difference in the mental function score was seen within or between groups. No differences in sleep quality or satisfaction were seen among groups (P values 0.405 and 1.00, respectively). No adverse events were reported in all groups. ConclusionsNo significant difference was demonstrated between a single injection ISB with dexamethasone, a LB injection and an ISC. Given the equivalence in analgesia provided with these three modalities, providers should carefully consider the option that best fits each patient. Thus, a single injection of LB or single injection of bupivacaine with dexamethasone provides similar analgesic efficacy compared to ISC.

Novel perfusion system using continuous liquid-suction catheter attachment in colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection with water pressure method (with video).

Water pressure method (WPM) is useful for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), characterized not only by underwater conditions but also by active water pressure via the waterjet function. However, the extension of the colorectum by injecting excess water and contaminating the operative field by stool and bleeding have been issues. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of a novel perfusion system using a continuous liquid-suction catheter attachment (CLCA) in colorectal ESD with WPM. We retrospectively reviewed cases in which the perfusion system was used in colorectal ESD with WPM between August 2022 and September 2023. We evaluated clinical characteristics, treatment outcomes, volume of injection by the waterjet function, volume of suction by the endoscope and CLCA, and concentration of floating matter in the operative field over time. Thirty-one cases were enrolled. The median lesion size was 30 (range, 15-100) mm. In all cases, en bloc resection was achieved without perforation. The median injection volume was 2312 (range, 1234-13,866) g. The median suction volumes by the endoscope and CLCA were 918 (range, 141-3162) and 1147 (range, 254-11,222) g, respectively. The median concentration of floating matter in the operative field (measured in 15 cases) was 15.3 (range, 7.3-112) mg/mL when the endoscope arrived at the lesion and 8.0 (range, 3.2-16) mg/mL after endoscopically washing at the beginning of the ESD. It ranged from 7.6 to 13.4 mg/dL every 20 min during ESD. This perfusion system could prevent the extension of the lumen and maintain a good field of view in colorectal ESD with WPM.

Optimising postoperative care: Same-day discharge after transurethral resection of the prostate.

This study aims to assess the feasibility and safety of same-day discharge after transurethral resection of the prostate. Five years of records were retrospectively analysed. Length of stay categorised patients into Groups 1 (same-day discharge) and 2 (standard-length discharge). Logistic regression analysis was performed, controlling for clinicodemographic factors. Student's t-test compared continuous bladder irrigation and catheter dwell times. A total of 459 patients were identified between 2016 and 2021, 280 in Group 1 and 179 in Group 2, with median ages of 71.0 (interquartile range 36-92) and 72.0 (interquartile range 47-101) years (p = 0.067), respectively. Same-day discharge rates notably increased post-2018 (p = 0.025). Median prostate tissue resected in Group 2 was 7.1g (3.4-12.4g) and in Group 1 was 4.9g (2.4-10.2g; p = 0.034). While continuous bladder irrigation >1 hour was significantly lower in Group 1 than Group 2 (96.8% versus 27.4%; p = 0.0001), catheter dwell times were comparable (70.1 and 70.8 hours, respectively). Control-adjusted results showed a 40% reduction in emergency department representation odds for Group 1 compared with Group 2 (odds ratio = 0.60; 95% confidence interval = 0.37-0.99; p = 0.04). Length of stay was not significantly associated with hospital readmissions (p = 0.11). Continuous bladder irrigation for <1 hour in Group 1 was associated with a reduced emergency department representation (odds ratio = 0.43; 95% confidence interval = 0.197-0.980) but not readmission (odds ratio = 0.413; 95% confidence interval = 0.166-1.104). Same-day discharge post-transurethral resection of the prostate may be a viable and safe option for carefully selected patients.

Continuous Epidural Catheter for Postoperative Analgesia in Children: A Case Report

The management of postoperative pain in children and infants has now become a significant concern. Continuous epidural anesthesia is a proven method for controlling acute pain after surgery. We present the case of thoracic epidural analgesia used for the repair of an extensive burn involving the back and trunk, assisted by a skin graft, in a 6-year-old girl. Department of Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Children's Hospital of Rabat. In pediatric surgery, postoperative pain awareness is crucial for medical and paramedical teams. Continuous epidural anesthesia, utilizing suitable equipment, is feasible for young children. Its advantages during long procedures are manifold: it eliminates the need for central analgesics, ensuring stable cardiovascular function and a calm awakening post-surgery. Moreover, it provides high-quality analgesia in the postoperative phase, decreasing morbidity and easing care for children. With safe analgesics and advances in locoregional anesthesia, managing postoperative pain in pediatrics has markedly improved.

Fascia Iliaca Catheters for Donor Site Pain After Split-Thickness Skin Grafting for Acute Burn Injury: A Retrospective Review.

The management of acute burn pain poses significant challenges. Regional techniques have become increasingly popular in perioperative burn pain management. Continuous nerve block catheters are particularly useful for split-thickness skin grafts where donor site pain can exceed that of the burn-injured site. Donor skin is frequently harvested from the anterolateral thigh. The fascia iliaca (FI) compartment block provides blockade of both the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve and the femoral nerve, and thus, it is a useful modality for burn donor pain. Our institution initiated a protocol in which continuous FI catheters were placed in patients undergoing split-thickness skin grafting of the anterolateral thigh. This retrospective review seeks to assess the impact of this modality on postoperative pain scores and opioid requirements. Oral morphine equivalent (OME) administration was significantly lower in the FI group than the control group, starting with POD 0, which is the day of the FI catheter insertion (188 vs 327 mg, P < .001). Over the next 4 postoperative days (PODs), OME administration remained lower in the FI group compared to control patients, although not statistically significant on PODs 3-4. There was a significant difference in OME administered between the FI group and the control group on POD 5 (159.5 vs 209.2 mg, P < .05). Our retrospective study evaluating the role of FI catheters in burn patients undergoing split-thickness skin grafting surgery showed significantly lower opioid consumption on PODs 1-5 compared to patients without an FI catheter.

Enhancing pain control in elbow rehabilitation; A case report of variable ropivacaine dosages through Brachial Plexus Catheter

Managing postoperative pain and discomfort during physiotherapy for upper arm injuries, including complex fractures or traumatic amputations, is crucial. Challenges include severe pain, stiffness, and limited range of motion. Physiotherapy is vital for preventing muscle atrophy, promoting joint mobility, and facilitating functional recovery.The successful management of postoperative pain and pain during physiotherapy in a 27-year-old female, who sustained multiple injuries including a displaced distal humerus fracture and a traumatic right-hand amputation, was achieved through the utilization of a continuous brachial plexus block with variable doses of ropivacaine. The patient’s history revealed a complex array of injuries, including a displaced distal humerus fracture and traumatic right-hand amputation, necessitating open reduction and internal fixation for the fracture and subsequent hand debridement. Despite addressing stiffness through capsulectomy, persistent concerns arose regarding postoperative pain and discomfort during physiotherapy sessions. To address these concerns, a continuous supraclavicular catheter was placed under ultrasound guidance, providing effective pain relief and facilitating physiotherapy interventions for optimal recovery. The patient underwent open reduction and internal fixation for the humerus fracture which was subsequently managed with amputation of several fingers and a hand debridement procedure. Following the surgeries, the patient complained of a stiff elbow, which was addressed through capsulectomy. However, concerns persisted regarding postoperative pain and pain during physiotherapy sessions, leading to the decision to place a continuous supraclavicular catheter. The catheter was accurately positioned under ultrasound guidance and tunneled under the skin, providing effective pain relief for seven days. Ropivacaine was administered as per the patient’s requirements, with a background infusion of 0.2% ropivacaine at 8-hour intervals, a 10 ml bolus of 0.2% ropivacaine administered half an hour before physiotherapy, and 10 ml of 0.5% ropivacaine during physiotherapy sessions if pain levels exceeded 4 on the numerical rating scale. This case highlights the utility of continuous brachial plexus blockade for prolonged postoperative analgesia and pain management during physiotherapy in patients with upper extremity injuries.

Effects of the low-speed continuous infusion catheter technique on double-lumen central venous catheters: A randomized controlled trial

BackgroundCentral venous catheters are widely used in clinical practice, and the incidence of central venous catheter occlusion is between 25 % and 38 %. The turbulence caused by the pulsatile flushing technique is harmful to the vascular endothelium and may lead to phlebitis. The low-speed continuous infusion catheter technique is a new type of continuous infusion that ensures that the catheter is always in a keep-vein-open state by continuous low-speed flushing; hence, avoiding the problem of catheter occlusion. ObjectiveTo investigate the effectiveness of the low-speed continuous infusion catheter technique and the routine care of double-lumen central venous catheters. DesignThis was a prospective, randomized, controlled, open-label trial. SettingPatients were recruited from 14 medical institutions in China between February and June 2023. ParticipantsIn total, 251 patients were recruited, with 125 in the intervention group and 126 in the control group. MethodsPatients who used double-lumen central venous catheters for infusion treatment were selected, and those who met the sampling criteria were randomly divided into intervention and control groups using the random envelope method. The intervention group used low-speed continuous infusion catheter technique to maintain catheter patency, whereas the control group used routine care with a trial period of 7 days. The primary outcome was occlusion rate. The secondary outcomes included nursing satisfaction and complication rates of the two groups. ResultsAfter 7 days, the rate of catheter occlusion was 28.0 % (35/125, 95 % confidence intervals (CI):0.203,0.367) in the intervention group and 53.97 % (68/126,95%CI:0.449 ~ 0.629) in the control group, with a statistically significant difference (χ2 = 17.488, p < 0.001); at 3 days of intervention, the rate of catheter blockage was 8.0 % (10/125，95%CI: 0.039 ~ 0.142) in the intervention group and 23.8 % (30/126，0.167 ~ 0.322) in the control group, with a statistically significant difference (χ2 = 11.707，p < 0.001). Nurse satisfaction was significantly higher in the intervention group (115/125，92.0 %，95%CI: 0.858 ~ 0.961) than in the control group (104/126, 82.54 %,95%CI: 0.748 ~ 0.887) (χ2 = 5.049, p = 0.025). There were no statistically significant complication rates in either group (p = 0.622). ConclusionThe low-speed continuous infusion catheter technique helps maintain catheter patency, improves nurse satisfaction, and provides a high level of safety. RegistrationChinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2200064007，www.chictr.org.cn). The first recruitment was conducted in February.https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=177311

Pain management after hip fracture repair surgery: a systematic review and procedure-specific postoperative pain management (PROSPECT) recommendations

Hip fracture is associated with moderate-to-severe postoperative pain, which can influence postoperative recovery and length of stay. The aim of this systematic review was to update the available literature and develop recommendations for optimal pain management after hip fracture. A systematic review utilising procedure specific postoperative pain management (PROSPECT) methodology was undertaken. Randomised controlled trials, systematic reviews and meta-analysis published in the English language between 04 April 2005 and 12 May 2021, evaluating the effects of analgesic, anaesthetic and surgical interventions were retrieved from MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Databases. A total of 60 studies met the inclusion criteria. For patients having hip fracture, pre, intra and postoperative paracetamol and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or COX-2 inhibitors are recommended. A single shot femoral nerve block or a single shot fascia iliaca compartment block are recommended. Continuous catheter techniques should be used only in specific circumstances. The choice between femoral nerve block or a fascia iliaca compartment block should be made according to local expertise. The postoperative regimen should include regular paracetamol, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and COX-2 inhibitors with opioids used for rescue. Some of the interventions, although effective, carry risks, and consequentially were omitted from the recommendations, while other interventions were not recommended due to insufficient, inconsistent or lack of evidence.

Utility of Ultrasound-Guided Continuous Lower Limb Perineural Catheters for Treatment of Pediatric Complex Regional Pain Syndrome Type I: A Primary Case Report from India

Abstract Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) is a chronic localized pain condition affecting all age groups with more propensity toward adolescent girls. This disease has a multifactorial pathophysiology involving the sympathetic and central nervous system, along with psychosocial, immune, and genetic factors. We reported a case of CRPS Type I in an adolescent boy who was successfully managed by continuous lower limb nerve blocks through perineural catheters along with the continuation of pharmacological management.

Kiosk 10R-TC-02 - Continuous 3D Catheter Balloon Tracking for Mri-guided Cardiac Catheterization Using Orthogonal 1D Slice Projection Imaging – Proof of Concept

Kiosk 10R-TC-02 - Continuous 3D Catheter Balloon Tracking for Mri-guided Cardiac Catheterization Using Orthogonal 1D Slice Projection Imaging – Proof of Concept

Erector spinae plane block in spine surgeries: Single-level versus bi-level, single-shot versus continuous catheter technique.

Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is one of the commonly preferred regional anesthesia techniques in the recent past for various procedures including spine surgeries. The main advantages of ESPB are the ease of performing the technique and the lesser chance of complications. Many studies have proven that ESPB plays an important role in reducing perioperative opioid consumption, postoperative nausea and vomiting, as well as the length of stay in the hospital. Thus it has been adopted as one of the measures for the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol. Nevertheless, the role of bi-level ESPB and a continuous catheter technique are the major research gaps and thus require further research in this population. The details of these two methods are discussed elaborately here.