Continuous Androgen Deprivation Therapy Research Articles

Clinical efficacy of different androgen deprivation therapies for prostate cancer and evaluation based on dynamic-contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging

ObjectiveTo evaluate the clinical efficacy of different androgen deprivation therapies for prostate cancer (PCa) based on dynamic-contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI).Methods104 patients with PCa were studied, all of whom were treated with androgen deprivation therapy. The patients were divided into a continuous group (continuous androgen deprivation therapy) and an intermittent group (intermittent androgen deprivation therapy) by random number table method, 52 cases/group. The therapeutic effect and DCE-MRI indices were compared and the relationship between DCE-MRI indices and clinical efficacy and the evaluation value of therapeutic efficacy were analyzed.ResultsThe objective response rate (ORR) of the intermittent group was higher than that of the continuous group (p < 0.05), and there was no significant difference in disease control rate (DCR) between the two groups (p > 0.05). After treatment, volume transfer coefficient (Ktrans), reverse transfer constant (Kep), volume fraction (Ve), blood volume (BV), and blood flow (BF) in both groups were lowered, and those in the intermittent group were lower than the continuous group (p < 0.05). Ktrans, Kep, Ve, BF, and BV in the ORR group were lower than those in the non-ORR group (p < 0.05). Ktrans, Kep, Ve, BF, and BV were correlated with the therapeutic effect of PCa (p < 0.05). The AUC value of the combined detection of DCE-MRI indices in evaluating the therapeutic effect of PCa was greater than that of each index alone (p < 0.05).ConclusionCompared with continuous androgen deprivation therapy, intermittent androgen deprivation therapy has better clinical efficacy in the treatment of PCa, and DCE-MRI indices are related to the treatment efficacy of PCa and have an evaluation value.

Real-World Evaluation of Primary Versus Secondary Prevention of Skeletal-Related Events in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.

Anti-osteoclast treatment with denosumab or zoledronate is known to effectively reduce the need for radiotherapy to bone and other skeletal-related events (SREs) in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). In this study, we analyze primary versus secondary initiation of bone-targeting agents (BTAs) relative to first palliative bone radiotherapy in patients dying of mCRPC. Provincial administrative databases from Ontario, Canada identified patients with prostate cancer (2007-2018, n = 98646) who received continuous androgen deprivation therapy (n = 29453), died of prostate cancer (2013-2018, n = 3864), and received life-prolonging therapy for mCRPC (n = 1850). Variables were collected looking back 3 years from death. Multivariable analysis explored the relationship between clinical variables and BTAs. Of the 58% (1066/1850) patients with mCRPC who received BTA, only 289 (25.4%) started BTA prior to first palliative bone radiotherapy as primary prevention. Eight hundred and forty-eight (74.6%) patients either never received BTA before death (n = 447) or started BTA only after first bone radiotherapy (n = 401). More patients received denosumab (n = 825, 77%) than zoledronic acid (n = 241, 23%). 51.2% (582/1137) of palliative bone radiotherapy was initiated in the last 12 months of life. Factors associated with the use of BTA included elevated alkaline phosphatase (OR = 1.0, P = .023), de novo metastases (OR = 1.4, P = .005), medical oncologist involvement (OR = 2.0, P = .007), diagnosis 2012-2017 versus 2007-2011 (OR = 0.75, P = .034), and academic center (OR = 0.061, P = .007). A majority of patients with mCRPC never receive BTAs prior to first SRE, despite universal access and availability of these agents in Ontario. These results highlight an opportunity to improve outcomes by emphasizing early introduction of BTA in patients with mCRPC being started on systemic therapy.

How the Management of Biochemical Recurrence in Prostate Cancer Will Be Modified by the Concept of Anticipation and Incrementation of Therapy.

Biochemical recurrence (BCR) after primary treatments for prostate cancer (PC) is an extremely heterogeneous phase and at least a stratification into low- and high-risk cases for early progression in metastatic disease is necessary. At present, PSA-DT represents the best parameter to define low- and high-risk BCR PC, but real precision medicine is strongly suggested to define tailored management for patients with BCR. Before defining management, it is necessary to exclude the presence of low-volume metastasis associated with PSA progression using new-generation imaging, preferably with PSMA PET/CT. Low-risk BCR cases should be actively observed without early systemic therapies. Early treatment of low-risk BCR with continuous androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) can produce disadvantages such as the development of castration resistance before the appearance of metastases (non-metastatic castration-resistant PC). Patients with high-risk BCR benefit from early systemic therapy. Even with overall survival (OS) as the primary treatment endpoint, metastasis-free survival (MFS) should be used as a surrogate endpoint in clinical trials, especially in long survival stages of the disease. The EMBARK study has greatly influenced the management of high-risk BCR, by introducing the concept of anticipation and intensification through the use of androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSIs) and ADT combination therapy. In high-risk (PSA-DT ≤ 9 months) BCR cases, the combination of enzalutamide with leuprolide significantly improves MFS when compared to leuprolide alone, maintaining an unchanged quality of life in the asymptomatic phase of the disease. The possibility of using ARSIs alone in this early disease setting is suggested by the EMBARK study (arm with enzalutamide alone) with less evidence than with the intensification of the combination therapy. Continued use versus discontinuation of enzalutamide plus leuprolide intensified therapy upon reaching undetectable PSA levels needs to be better defined with further analysis. Real-world analysis must verify the significant results obtained in the context of a phase 3 study.

Testosterone suppression and recovery in patients with advanced prostate cancer treated with intermittent androgen deprivation therapy (iADT) with relugolix.

70 Background: Many patients with advanced prostate cancer do not want to pursue continuous androgen deprivation therapy (cADT) because of concerns about side effects, and pursue iADT. However, even intermittent treatment with GNRH agonist therapy may not lead to rapid recovery of testosterone during the off-treatment period. In the pivotal HERO trial of relugolix (GNRH antagonist) the testosterone recovery time was in weeks [PMID 32469183]. The objective of the study was to measure the time to testosterone suppression to castrate level and time to recovery of serum testosterone to non-castrate level in real-world patients with advanced prostate cancer undergoing intermittent relugolix therapy. Methods: In this IRB-approved retrospective study, the eligibility was: patients with advanced prostate cancer undergoing iADT with relugolix. iADT with relugolix was defined as initiating relugolix at PSA ≥ 10 ng/ml and holding relugolix when PSA ≤ 4 ng/ml. The primary endpoints were: 1) time to serum castrate level of testosterone after relugolix initiation and 2) time to recovery to non-castrate level after discontinuation of relugolix. Castrate level of serum testosterone was defined as serum testosterone level ≤ 50 ng/dL. Results: Overall 25 consecutive patients with advanced prostate cancer treated with iADT with relugolix were eligible and included. The median age was 75 [range 68-88]. Patients with a Gleason score of ≥ 8 comprised 44% of the cohort. The median PSA at the start of therapy was 18.2 ng/ml [5.1 – 99.1 ng/ml]. Median time to testosterone ≤ 50 ng/dl after relugolix initiation was 1.13 months [0.67 – 2.5 months], and median time to testosterone recovery after relugolix discontinuation was 1.4 months [0.83 – 6.57 months]. The median PSA nadir achieved with relugolix was 2.02 ng/ml [0.1 – 4.8], and median time to PSA nadir was 1.35 months from initiation of therapy (0.67 – 4.8 months). Median time to PSA relapse ≥ 10 ng/dl after holding relugolix was 3.4 months (0.9 – 8.23 months). Conclusions: This is the first real-world study to show that iADT with relugolix is associated with a rapid time to testosterone suppression and recovery. These results may guide patients’ counseling, monitoring of serum testosterone and PSA levels in patients wishing to pursue iADT for advanced prostate cancer. These hypothesis-generating data need external validation.

Apalutamide (APA) plus intermittent versus continuous androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) in participants (pts) with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC): LIBERTAS phase 3 study design.

Apalutamide (APA) plus intermittent versus continuous androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) in participants (pts) with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC): LIBERTAS phase 3 study design.

Abstract C017: Comparing prostate specific antigen dynamics between Black patients and White patients

Abstract Black men have the highest prostate cancer (PCa) mortality across all US population groups. We hypothesize that this may be the result of low participation from black men in clinical trials and socioeconomic facotrs. We use a simple mathematical model to investigate differences in PSA dynamics between black and white men undergoing androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). The model was calibrated to longitudinal PSA data from 57 PCa patients (N = 47 white, N = 10 black) receiving continuous androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). To compensate for the lack of data for black patients, propensity score matching was used to select 15 white patients that were most alike to the 10 black patients based on their Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score, age, and tumor burden. Using a previously developed model of stem cell, non-stem, and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) dynamics, parameter analysis and leave-one-out process were used to determine which parameters should be uniform among all patients and which should be patient-specific to determine if any parameters showed a significant difference. Each patient’s parameter values were used to see if intermittent ADT (IADT) or adaptive ADT could extend the time to progression and narrow disparity gaps. We then sampled from the parameter distributions to create 50 black and 50 white in-silico patients to simulate continuous and intermittent ADT to further validate our results. The leave-one-out analysis found that a uniform ADT cytotoxicity resulted in the best Akaike Information Criteria score for black and white patients. A nested optimization was subsequently used to determine race-specific uniform cytotoxicity rates, while the remaining patient-specific parameters were determined. Statistical analysis found that black patients had a significantly higher stem cell self-renewal rate than the white patients. We hypothesize that this is primarily responsible for earlier progression in black patients. Simulations of continuous and intermittent ADT for real and in-silico patients showed that IADT and adaptive ADT can extend the time to progression (TTP) for both black and white patients. The TTP was extended by 50% for the black patients, and 25% for the white patients, thus the black patients had a greater benefit. However, the median TTP for black patients on IADT was less than that for white patients on continuous ADT. This suggests that further investigation of different treatments needs to be done to close disparity gaps. Our results show that stem cell self-renewal is driving differences in PSA dynamics between white and black patients. Intermittent Androgen Deprivation Therapy could potentially be a step in addressing the higher stem-cell self-renewal rate in black patients and narrowing the health disparity gap between black and white Pca patients. This valuable information can be used in the future to design race-specific treatment modalities to maximally delay time to progression. Citation Format: Alexandria Johnson, Renee Brady. Comparing prostate specific antigen dynamics between Black patients and White patients [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 16th AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2023 Sep 29-Oct 2;Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2023;32(12 Suppl):Abstract nr C017.

Intermittent Versus Continuous Androgen Deprivation Therapy for Biochemical Progression After Primary Therapy in Hormone-Sensitive Nonmetastatic Prostate Cancer: Comparative Analysis in Terms of CRPC-M0 Progression

IntroductionTo analyze whether the use of an intermittent (IAD) versus continuous (CAD) androgen deprivation therapy for the treatment of biochemical progression after primary treatments in prostate cancer can influence the development of nonmetastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC-M0). Patients170 male patients with an histologically confirmed diagnosis of PC, presenting a biochemical progression after primary treatments (82 after radical prostatectomy and 88 after external radiation therapy), nonmetastatic at imaging were considered for continuous (85 cases) or intermittent (85 cases) administration of androgen deprivation therapy. Methodswe retrospectively collect all data regarding histological diagnosis, primary treatment, imaging for M0-M1 staging, PSA at progression, time to biochemical progression from primary therapy, ADT used, IAD cycles, so to compare in 2 groups (IAD vs. CAD) time for progression from the beginning of ADT treatment and type of progression in terms of CRPC-M0 versus CRPC-M1 cases. Resultsno significant (P= .4955) difference in the whole CRPC progression was found between IAD (25.8%) and CAD (30.5%) treatment at a mean of 32.7 ± 7.02 months and 35.6 ± 13.1 months respectively (P= .0738). Mean PSA at CRPC development was significantly higher in the IAD group (5.16 ± 0.68 ng/mL) than in the CAD group (3.1 ± 0.7 ng/mL) (P < .001). In all cases, imaging to detect M status at CRPC development was PET TC scan. At univariate analysis CAD administration significantly increases the RR for CRPC-M0 progression (RR 3.48; 95%CI 1.66-7.29; P = .01) when compared to the IAD administration, and this effect at multivariate analysis remained significant and independent to the other variables (RR 2.34, 95%CI 1.52-5.33; P = .03). Conclusionsin our population with biochemical progression after primary treatment for PC, the intermittent administration of ADT significantly reduces the risk to develop CRPC-M0 disease when compared to a continuous administration of ADT, whereas no difference between the 2 strategies in terms of CRPC-M1 progression exists.

Biochemical recurrence in patients with prostate cancer after primary definitive therapy: treatment based on risk stratification.

Nearly one-third of patients with prostate cancer (PCa) experience biochemical recurrence (BCR) after primary definitive treatment. BCR increases the risk of distant metastasis and mortality in patients with prognostically unfavorable features. These patients are best managed with a tailored treatment strategy incorporating risk stratification using clinicopathological factors, next-generation imaging, and genomic testing. This narrative review examines the utility of risk stratification for the management of patients with BCR in the context of clinical trial data, referencing the latest recommendations by European and US medical societies. PubMed was searched for relevant studies published through May 21 2023 on treatment of patients with BCR after radical prostatectomy (RP) or external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). European and US guidelines support the risk-stratified management of BCR. Post-RP, salvage EBRT (with or without androgen deprivation therapy [ADT]) is an accepted treatment option for patients with BCR. Post-EBRT, local salvage therapies (RP, cryotherapy, high-intensity focused ultrasound, stereotactic body radiotherapy, and low-dose-rate and high-dose-rate brachytherapy) have demonstrated comparable relapse-free survival rates but differing adverse event profiles, short and long term. Local salvage therapies should be used for local-only relapses while ADT should be considered for regional or distant relapses. In practice, patients often receive ADT, with varying guidance for intermittent ADT vs. continuous ADT, due to consideration of quality-of-life effects. Despite a lack of consensus for BCR treatment among guideline associations and medical societies, risk stratification of patients is essential for personalized treatment approaches, as it allows for an informed selection of therapeutic strategies and estimation of adverse events. In lower-risk disease, observation is recommended while in higher-risk disease, after failed repeat local therapy, ADT and/or clinical trial enrollment may be appropriate. Results from ongoing clinical studies of patients with BCR should provide consensus for management.

Comparison of Intermittent and Continuous Androgen Deprivation Therapy in Prostate Cancer Patients: An Up-to-Date Meta-analysis for Urologists and Medical Providers.

Androgen deprivation therapy first became the treatment of choice for advanced prostate cancer in the 1940s with Charles Huggins' discoveries. Eight decades later, androgen deprivation therapy has significantly evolved, and yet is still utilized in various ways to treat certain forms of prostate cancer. For local recurrence after failed primary treatment and for locally advanced and metastatic disease, continuous androgen deprivation therapy has been standard of treatment. However, intermittent androgen deprivation therapy has emerged as a therapeutic alternative to continuous androgen deprivation therapy. The purpose of this meta-analysis is to provide an update on mortality, specifically prostate cancer-specific and nonprostate cancer causes, in order to offer some guidance when selecting the appropriate form of systemic androgen deprivation therapy. The PubMed database was searched for prospective randomized clinical trials. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were defined. Using statistical software, we analyzed random-effects models with the assumption that the data were randomly sampled, estimated the pooled log risk ratio, assessed heterogeneity, and created funnel plots to evaluate publication bias. A total of 12 randomized clinical trials met all inclusion criteria for final analysis. There was no statistically significant difference in prostate cancer-specific mortality between intermittent androgen deprivation therapy and continuous androgen deprivation therapy (RR=1.10 [0.85-1.42]). The analysis of nonprostate cancer mortality favored intermittent androgen deprivation therapy over continuous androgen deprivation therapy, but the difference was statistically insignificant (RR=0.94 [0.76-1.17]). These 2 treatment modalities can be considered as equivalent in long-term treatment outcomes. As intermittent androgen deprivation therapy is more cost-efficient and less likely to yield adverse side effects, future treatment guidelines should consider these advantages over continuous androgen deprivation therapy.

Efficacy and safety outcomes of darolutamide in patients with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer with comorbidities and concomitant medications from the randomised phase 3 ARAMIS trial

PurposeIn patients with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) in the Androgen Receptor Antagonizing Agent for Metastasis-free Survival (ARAMIS) trial, darolutamide significantly improved median metastasis-free survival by nearly 2 years and reduced the risk of death by 31% versus placebo, with a favourable safety/tolerability profile. This post hoc analysis of ARAMIS evaluated efficacy and safety in patients by number of comorbidities and concomitant medications. MethodsPatients with nmCRPC were randomised 2:1 to darolutamide (n = 955) or placebo (n = 554) while continuing androgen-deprivation therapy. Overall survival (OS) and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were evaluated in subgroups by median numbers of ongoing comorbidities and concomitant medications. HRs were determined from univariate analysis using Cox regression. FindingsMedian numbers of comorbidities and concomitant medications were 6 and 10, respectively, with 41.6% of patients having >6 comorbidities and 48.8% taking >10 concomitant medications. For patients with ≤ 6 and >6 comorbidities, darolutamide increased OS versus placebo (hazard ratio [HR] 0.65 and 0.73, respectively), and this benefit was consistent for cardiovascular, metabolic, and other comorbidities (HR range: 0.39–0.88). For patients taking ≤ 10 and >10 concomitant medications, increased OS was also observed with darolutamide versus placebo (HR 0.76 and 0.66, respectively), and the benefit was consistent across medication classes (HR range: 0.45–0.80). Incidences of TEAEs and TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation with darolutamide were similar to placebo across subgroups by numbers of comorbidities and concomitant medications. ConclusionsThe OS benefit and safety of darolutamide remained consistent with that observed in the overall ARAMIS population, even in patients with high numbers of comorbidities or concomitant medications. ClinicalTrials.gov registrationNCT02200614. Tweetable abstractDarolutamide increased overall survival versus placebo, and incidences of most adverse events were similar between treatments in patients with ≤ 6 or >6 comorbidities and those taking ≤ 10 or >10 concomitant medications.

Prostate irradiation in men with de novo, low-volume, metastatic, castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC): Results of PEACE-1, a phase 3 randomized trial with a 2x2 design.

LBA5000 Background: PEACE-1 demonstrated that combining ADT and docetaxel with abiraterone acetate plus prednisone (AAP) improves both overall survival (OS) and radiographic progression-free-survival (rPFS) in men with de novo mCSPC. The present analysis examines the second pre-planned primary endpoint of PEACE-1 in the low-volume population: the impact of prostate irradiation (RT) in men receiving intensified systemic treatment. Methods: PEACE-1 is an academic, multicentre, international, 2x2 design, phase 3 trial. The co-primary endpoints for each question were rPFS and OS. The standard of care (SOC) was ADT alone or ADT plus docetaxel (Doce) at investigator’s discretion until 2017, then accrual was restricted to men receiving ADT+Doce. RT (74 Gy/37 fractions) was delivered after Doce completion when applicable. SOC included continuous ADT, with or without Doce at 75 mg/m² every 3 weeks for 6 cycles. AAP, 1000 mg/day with prednisone 10 mg/day was given to men randomized to the AAP arms until disease progression or intolerance. The overall type I error testing the RT effect was 5% (4.9% for OS, 0.1% for rPFS). In the low-volume population, 299 and 213 events were required to detect an HR of 0.62 for rPFS and 0.68 for OS with 80% power, respectively. Results: Between 11/2013 and 12/2018, 1172 men were randomized to receive either SOC (+/- AAP) plus RT (n=584) or SOC (+/- AAP) without RT (n=588). 505 patients had low-volume disease (0-3 bone metastases +/- lymph nodes), 252 in the RT arms, 253 in the non-RT arms. Baseline characteristics were similar across arms. With a median follow-up of 6.1 years, 303 rPFS and 214 OS events were recorded for the low-volume population. A qualitative interaction between RT and AAP was observed for rPFS (p=0.026) and therefore, each experimental arm was assessed individually. RT did not improve rPFS with a median of 3 years (99.9%CI 2.3-4.8) for SOC vs 2.6 (1.7-4.6) for SOC+RT; HR=1.12 (0.68-1.85). When compared individually to SOC, rPFS was improved by SOC+AAP+RT (median 7.5 years (99.9%CI: 4.0-NR); HR=0.49, [0.28-0.87], p&lt;0.0001) and borderline improved by SOC+AAP (median 4.4 years (95% CI: 2.5-7.6); HR=0.74, [0.44-1.26], p=0.066). The HR between AAP arms was 0.66 [0.36-1.19]. For OS the predefined threshold for a statistical interaction was not reached (p=0.11). OS was not improved by RT: median OS was 6.9 years (95.1%CI: 5.9-7.5) without RT vs 7.5 (6.0-NR) with RT (HR=0.97 [0.74-1.27], p=0.81). Median OS was 7.1 years in the SOC arm and not yet reached in the SOC+AAP+RT arm. Data on the RT prevention effect on severe urinary symptoms are pending. Conclusions: Combining prostate RT to systemic treatment did not improve OS in men with de novo mCSPC and low metastatic burden. However, best outcomes (rPFS and OS) were observed in men receiving SOC+AAP+RT. The impact of RT on severe urinary symptom prevention will be presented. Clinical trial information: NCT01957436 .

Clinical characteristics of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer after treatment with combined androgen blockade

BackgroundAlthough the second-generation androgen receptor inhibitors and taxanes have recently been recommended for the initial treatment of metastatic prostate cancer, bicalutamide and flutamide are still used in a large number of cases. Therefore, it is important to elucidate the clinical characteristics of these treated CRPC cases and their sensitivity to the currently used therapeutic agents. We aimed to examine the outcomes of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer following combined androgen blockade as initial therapy at our institution.MethodsNinety-four patients who developed metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer after hormonal treatment with combined nonsteroidal androgen receptor antagonists and continuous androgen deprivation therapy between January 2015 and December 2020 were included. The presence of visceral metastases, duration of efficacy of each treatment, and overall survival after castration-resistant prostate cancer were evaluated.ResultsPatients with a longer duration of castration-resistant prostate cancer tended to have a longer response duration to subsequent enzalutamide administration (p = 0.003). Patients who achieved a 90% reduction in prostate-specific antigen levels with enzalutamide had a significantly better castration-resistant prostate cancer prognosis (p = 0.002). Meanwhile, those with visceral metastases at the time of castration-resistant prostate cancer diagnosis had a significantly poorer prognosis (p < 0.001). A positive correlation was observed between the treatment efficacy of abiraterone and taxanes for castration-resistant prostate cancer.ConclusionThe study provides scientific evidence to support that patients with longer time to castration-resistant prostate cancer are more sensitive to enzalutamide, and the use of abiraterone between docetaxel and cabazitaxel has favorable prognostic impact. These findings provide instrumental evidence that can enable better treatment selection for prostate cancer patients.

Real-World Treatment Trends Among Patients with Metastatic Castration-Sensitive Prostate Cancer: Results from an International Study.

Continuous androgen deprivation therapy ± first-generation non-steroidal antiandrogen was previously the standard-of-care for patients with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC). Treatment intensification with novel hormonal therapy (NHT) or taxane chemotherapy is now approved and guideline-recommended for these patients. Physician-reported data on adult patients with mCSPC from the Adelphi Prostate Cancer Disease Specific Programme were analyzed descriptively. We evaluated real-world treatment trends for patients with mCSPC in 5 European countries (United Kingdom, France, Germany, Spain, and Italy) and the United States (US), looking at differences between patients initiating treatment in 2016-2018 and in 2019-2020. We also investigated treatment trends by ethnicity and insurance status in the US. This study found that most patients with mCSPC do not receive treatment intensification. However, greater use of treatment intensification with NHT and taxane chemotherapy was observed in 2019-2020 than in 2016-2018 across 5 European countries. In the US, greater use of treatment intensification with NHT in 2019-2020 than in 2016-2018 was observed for all ethnicity groups and those with Medicare and commercial insurance status. As the number of patients with mCSPC who receive treatment intensification increases, more patients who progress to metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) will have been exposed to intensified treatments. Treatment options for patients with mCSPC and mCRPC overlap, suggesting that an unmet need will emerge for new therapies. Further studies are needed to understand optimal treatment sequencing in mCSPC and mCRPC.

PD21-05 CARDIOVASCULAR OUTCOMES IN A POPULATION-BASED COHORT OF PROSTATE CANCER PATIENTS

You have accessJournal of UrologyCME1 Apr 2023PD21-05 CARDIOVASCULAR OUTCOMES IN A POPULATION-BASED COHORT OF PROSTATE CANCER PATIENTS Siqi Hu, Chun-Pin Chang, John Snyder, Vikrant Deshmukh, Michael Newman, Ankita Date, Carlos Carlos, Benjamin Haaland, Christy Porucznik, Lisa Gren, Alejandro Sanchez, Alejandro Sanchez, Shane Lloyd, Brock O’Neil, and Mia Hashibe Siqi HuSiqi Hu More articles by this author , Chun-Pin ChangChun-Pin Chang More articles by this author , John SnyderJohn Snyder More articles by this author , Vikrant DeshmukhVikrant Deshmukh More articles by this author , Michael NewmanMichael Newman More articles by this author , Ankita DateAnkita Date More articles by this author , Carlos CarlosCarlos Carlos More articles by this author , Benjamin HaalandBenjamin Haaland More articles by this author , Christy PorucznikChristy Porucznik More articles by this author , Lisa GrenLisa Gren More articles by this author , Alejandro SanchezAlejandro Sanchez More articles by this author , Alejandro SanchezAlejandro Sanchez More articles by this author , Shane LloydShane Lloyd More articles by this author , Brock O’NeilBrock O’Neil More articles by this author , and Mia HashibeMia Hashibe More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000003287.05AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Prostate cancer is the most common malignancy among men in the United States. Few studies have evaluated cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk comprehensively among prostate cancer patients with treatment dose-response relations. The primary aim of our study is to assess the incidence of cardiovascular diseases among prostate cancer patients compared to a general population cohort. A secondary aim is to investigate socioeconomic status (SES) and clinical risk factors for cardiovascular disorders among prostate cancer patients. METHODS: Cohorts of 18,134 cancer patients with prostate adenocarcinomas diagnosed between 2004 and 2017 and 73,470 men without cancer matched on age, birth state and follow-up time were identified. CVD diagnoses were identified from electronic medical records and statewide healthcare facilities data. Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs), adjusted for race/ethnicity, education, baseline Body Mass Index (BMI), baseline Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), risk group, age at diagnosis, hyperlipidemia, smoking status, therapy type, and diagnosis year based on a comprehensive evaluation of confounding variables. RESULTS: The risks of CVDs, including hypertension, arterial diseases, and venous diseases, among prostate cancer survivors compared to general population were increased for all follow-up periods after cancer diagnosis (1-5 years: HR=1.17, 95% CI=1.13-1.20; 5-10 years: HR=1.11, 95% CI=1.07-1.16; 10-16 years: HR=1.13, 95% CI=1.06-1.21). The risk of CVD was increased with obesity, baseline comorbidities, lower SES, and advanced-stage cancer, and differed by first-course cancer treatment, with CVDs higher for androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and conservative treatment. Compared to intermittent ADT, continuous ADT was associated with increased risks of all-cause mortality among prostate cancer patients (HR=1.78, 95% CI=1.04-3.05). We also observed that an increasing duration of ADT was associated with an increased risk of arterial diseases (dose-response p=0.022) and an increased risk of all-cause mortality (dose-response p value=0.0439). CONCLUSIONS: We found an increased risk of CVDs that lasted through 10-16 years post-prostate cancer diagnosis. Lifestyle interventions to decrease the risk of CVDs in prostate cancer survivors may be potentially beneficial to increasing life expectancy. Source of Funding: This work was supported by grants from the NIH (R01 CA244326, R21 CA185811, R03 CA159357, M.Hashibe, PI), the Huntsman Cancer Institute, and the Cancer Control and Population Sciences Program (HCI Cancer Center Support Grant P30CA042014). This research was supported by the Utah Cancer Registry, which is funded by the National Cancer Institute's SEER Program, Contract No. HHSN261201800016I, the US Center for Disease Control and Prevention's National Program of Cancer Registries, Cooperative Agreement No. NU58DP0063200-01, with additional support from the University of Utah and Huntsman Cancer Foundation. Partial support for all datasets within the Utah Population Database is provided by the University of Utah, Huntsman Cancer Institute and the Huntsman Cancer Institute Cancer Center Support grant, P30 CA42014 from the National Cancer Institute © 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 209Issue Supplement 4April 2023Page: e591 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Siqi Hu More articles by this author Chun-Pin Chang More articles by this author John Snyder More articles by this author Vikrant Deshmukh More articles by this author Michael Newman More articles by this author Ankita Date More articles by this author Carlos Carlos More articles by this author Benjamin Haaland More articles by this author Christy Porucznik More articles by this author Lisa Gren More articles by this author Alejandro Sanchez More articles by this author Alejandro Sanchez More articles by this author Shane Lloyd More articles by this author Brock O’Neil More articles by this author Mia Hashibe More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...

Role of apalutamide in the treatment landscape for patients with advanced prostate cancer: an expert opinion statement of European clinical practice

BackgroundPatients with advanced prostate cancer have a poor prognosis, and well-tolerated new treatment strategies are required to improve survival outcomes. Apalutamide is a novel androgen signalling inhibitor developed to be used in combination with continuous androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for the treatment of patients with advanced prostate cancer. Based on evidence from two phase 3 pivotal clinical trials in non-metastatic castration-resistant (nmCRPC; SPARTAN) and metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC; TITAN), ADT plus apalutamide significantly extends overall survival compared with the standard of care.AimsTo provide practical recommendations to guide optimal use in the real-world setting as the use of apalutamide in clinical practice increases.MethodsExpert opinion from a group of European physicians is presented here to educate on the use of apalutamide in combination with ADT in patients with mHSPC and patients with nmCRPC who are at risk of developing metastatic disease, focusing on practical considerations such as patient selection, monitoring, and management of side effects.ResultsIn clinical practice, apalutamide in combination with ADT can be used in a broad patient population including patients with high and low volume/risk mHSPC, patients with de novo metastatic disease or metastases following treatment for localised disease, as well as older patients. Apalutamide in combination with ADT is well tolerated, with manageable side effects which do not impact health-related quality of life compared to ADT alone.ConclusionsReal-world experience with apalutamide supports the efficacy and safety findings reported by the SPARTAN and TITAN clinical trials.

Mass spectrometry redefines optimal testosterone thresholds in prostate cancer patients undergoing androgen deprivation therapy.

Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is the standard of care for prostate cancer treatment. Studies suggest that patients with testosterone levels below 0.7 nM have a longer time to castration resistance. Using the most accurate testosterone measurement method, namely mass spectrometry (MS), we sought to determine if a lower testosterone level under ADT could be associated with longer time to castration resistance. This retrospective study included 138 prostate cancer patients undergoing noncurative continuous ADT for which we had access to testosterone measurements assessed by MS. For 108 samples, paired immunoassays (IA) testosterone measurement was available. Primary outcome was time to castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). The Contal and O'Quigley method was used to determine the optimal testosterone castration cut-off point considering the outcome and time-to-event variables. Relationship between testosterone levels assessed either by IA or MS and time to CRPC was evaluated using Cox regression. Mean testosterone level was 0.370 nM by IA and 0.275 nM as assessed by MS. The optimal testosterone cut-off point identified to predict time to CRPC was of 0.705 nM for IA and of 0.270 nM for MS. While no significant difference for time to CRPC was found between patients showing IA testosterone level ≥0.705 nM versus <0.705 nM (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.579; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.908-2.745), patients with MS testosterone ≥0.270 nM had an increased risk of progression to CRPC compared to MS testosterone <0.270 nM in univariate (HR: 1.717; 95% CI: 1.160-2.541) and multivariate analysis (HR: 1.662; 95% CI: 1.043-2.648). The higher sensitivity of MS testosterone measurement methods allows the identification of a lower castration threshold and leads to early identification of patients more likely to progress to CRPC. These patients would likely benefit from treatment intensification by androgen receptor axis-targeted therapies to delay disease progression.

Association of intermittent or continuous androgen deprivation therapy with cardiovascular disease and endocrine/metabolic disorders in patients with nonmetastatic prostate cancer.

83 Background: Evidence on risks of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and endocrine/metabolic disorders associated with long-term intermittent and continuous androgen deprivation therapy (iADT and cADT, respectively) in patients (pts) with nonmetastatic prostate cancer (nmPC) is mixed. This real-world study examined these risks in pts with nmPC receiving iADT or cADT in the US. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of SEER-Medicare pts with nmPC initiating ADT (2010–2017), with ≥36 months of continuous insurance coverage, unless death occurred, and who did not receive chemotherapy or a second-generation anti-androgen during follow-up. iADT and cADT cohorts were defined by treatment patterns and gaps in therapy. Comorbidities and clinical events were identified using ICD-9/10-CM codes. Outcomes examined were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE [myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, cardiomyopathy/heart failure (HF), pulmonary embolism (PE), ischemic heart disease (IHD), or all-cause mortality]) and endocrine/metabolic events (diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, bone fractures, or osteoporosis). Inverse probability of treatment-weighted Cox regression models estimated the adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) of the outcomes. Subgroup analyses examined pts by CVD history. A sensitivity analysis restricted the definition of MACE to include CVD-related mortality as a component, i.e., MACESA (MI, stroke, cardiomyopathy/HF, PE, IHD, or CVD-related mortality). Results: 10,655 pts were included; 2095 (20%) received iADT and 8560 (80%) cADT; 63% of iADT pts and 66% of cADT pts had baseline CVD history. Median follow-up was 44 and 48 months and time on ADT (excluding gaps for iADT pts) was 23 and 17 months for the iADT and cADT cohorts, respectively. In adjusted analyses, pts receiving cADT had a lower risk of MACE vs iADT. No difference in risk of endocrine/metabolic events was observed. Results for MACE were similar in pts with prior CVD history; however, there was no difference in risk of MACE in those without CVD history. Sensitivity analysis results for MACESA were similar to the main results. Conclusions: Pts with nmPC receiving cADT had a lower risk of MACE, and no difference in risk of endocrine/metabolic events, compared with iADT. There was no difference in risk of MACE in pts without a prior history of CVD. [Table: see text]

Association of intermittent vs continuous androgen deprivation therapy with cardiovascular disease and endocrine/metabolic disorders in patients with metastatic prostate cancer.

82 Background: There is mixed evidence on the risks of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and endocrine/metabolic disorders associated with long-term intermittent and continuous androgen deprivation therapy (iADT and cADT, respectively) for metastatic prostate cancer (mPC). This study examined these risks in patients (pts) with mPC receiving iADT vs cADT in the US. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of SEER-Medicare pts with mPC initiating ADT (2010–2017), with ≥36 months of continuous insurance coverage, unless death occurred, who did not receive chemotherapy or a second-generation anti-androgen during follow-up. iADT and cADT cohorts were defined by treatment patterns and gaps in therapy. Comorbidities and clinical events were identified using ICD-9/10-CM codes. Outcomes examined were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE [myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, cardiomyopathy/heart failure (HF), pulmonary embolism (PE), ischemic heart disease (IHD), or all-cause mortality]) and endocrine/metabolic events (diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, bone fractures, or osteoporosis). Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to adjust for differences between cohorts; weighted Cox models were used to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) of the outcomes. Subgroup analyses examined pts by CVD history; a sensitivity analysis was performed restricting the definition of MACE to include CVD-related mortality as a component, i.e., MACESA (MI, stroke, cardiomyopathy/HF, PE, IHD, or CVD-related mortality). Results: 2234 pts with mPC were included; 478 (21%) received iADT and 1756 (79%) cADT. Median follow-up time was 27 and 13 months, and time on ADT (excluding gaps for iADT pts) was 24 and 19 months for the iADT and cADT cohorts, respectively. Deaths occurred in 39% of iADT pts vs 55% of cADT pts; PC was the most common cause of death in both cohorts. In adjusted analyses, pts receiving cADT had a higher risk of MACE vs iADT. No differences in risk of endocrine/metabolic events were observed. Subgroup analysis showed that baseline history of CVD did not alter the results for MACE. Sensitivity analysis results showed no difference in risk of MACESA between pts receiving cADT vs iADT. Conclusions: Pts with mPC receiving cADT had a higher risk of MACE (including all-cause mortality), and no difference in risk of endocrine/metabolic events, compared with those receiving iADT. When MACE was restricted to include CVD-related mortality, there was no difference in risk between cohorts. [Table: see text]

CAPItello-280: A phase III study of capivasertib and docetaxel versus placebo and docetaxel in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

TPS287 Background: Docetaxel is the standard first-line chemotherapy for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) whose disease progressed on an androgen receptor-targeted agent (ARTA; typically, abiraterone, enzalutamide, apalutamide, or darolutamide). However, most patients develop chemotherapy resistance, and median overall survival (OS) remains under 3 years. Preclinical studies have associated phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/protein kinase (AKT)/phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) pathway signaling with the development of mCRPC and with resistance to taxane chemotherapy. The ProCAID Phase II trial (NCT02121639) examined whether adding capivasertib, a potent, selective inhibitor of all three AKT isoforms (AKT1/2/3), to docetaxel chemotherapy improved clinical outcomes. Although no difference in the primary endpoint (composite progression-free survival [PFS]) was detected, OS, a secondary endpoint, was extended in the capivasertib plus docetaxel treatment group. A subsequent follow-up analysis at advanced maturity suggested that the OS benefit in ProCAID was restricted to patients who had received prior treatment with an ARTA. Methods: CAPItello-280 is a Phase III study to confirm the efficacy and safety of capivasertib in combination with docetaxel compared with placebo and docetaxel in patients with mCRPC who have not previously received chemotherapy for mCRPC, but whose disease has progressed despite treatment with an ARTA in any setting. Approximately 790 patients will be randomized 1:1 to receive either capivasertib or matching placebo (320 mg orally, twice daily [BD], 4 days on, 3 days off) plus docetaxel (75 mg/m2 on day 1 of each 21-day cycle for 6–10 cycles, with prednisone or prednisolone 5 mg BD or 10 mg once daily) with a background of continued androgen deprivation therapy until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, death, or withdrawal of consent. The primary endpoint is OS; secondary endpoints include radiographic PFS, time to pain progression, symptomatic skeletal events, safety, and tolerability. Recruitment began in March 2022 and is planned at 207 study sites in 20 countries, including the USA, Canada, Europe, South America, and Asia-Pacific. Clinical trial information: NCT05348577 .

Changes in Renal Function of Patients With Prostate Cancer: Focus on Androgen Deprivation Therapy.

To investigate the association between androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and changes in the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in male Japanese patients with prostate cancer, based on post-hoc analysis of data from a previous prospective study. Among 103 patients with prostate cancer in whom renal function changes were tracked over 5 years, 88 were divided into a group who completed ADT within 3 years (short ADT group; n=47) and a group who continued with ADT for more than 5 years (continuous ADT group; n=41). We compared the groups in terms of the eGFR, calculated based on age and serum creatinine (mg/dl) before ADT initiation and every other year over the next 5 years. The eGFR decreased by 4.91 and 2.89 ml/min in the short and continuous ADT groups, respectively, over the 5-year period following ADT initiation. The respective decreases in the eGFR were 0.98 and 0.58 ml/min/year. No significant difference in the eGFR was observed between the two groups at any measurement point. Patients treated with ADT showed a decrease in the eGFR of 0.58-0.98 ml/min/year over a 5-year period, which is about twice as high as that of normal Japanese males. No significant difference in the eGFR by ADT duration was observed. The eGFR decreased by 0.58-0.98 ml/min/year in our ADT patients, which was about twice as high as the rate of decrease in normal Japanese males, and approximately the same as in urine protein-positive male patients. We suggest that a large decrease in the eGFR may not play a role in the development of acute kidney injury. In addition, the duration of ADT does not appear to have a significant effect on the eGFR.