Context Of Health Service Delivery Research Articles

A bitter pill to swallow: registered nurses and medicines regulation in remote Australia.

Access to essential medicines is a human right and an objective of the National Medicines Policy in Australia. Health workforce distribution characteristics in remote Australia implies registered nurses (RNs) may find themselves responsible for a broader range of activities in the medication management cycle than they would be elsewhere in the nation. The regulation of health professionals and their training requirements provides essential but complex protections for the public. These protections include the National Registration and Accreditation Scheme for health practitioners and the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency. Other levels of control or regulation are also exerted over health professionals via mechanisms such as salaries and funding arrangements, insurance requirements, admitting rights to healthcare facilities, and legislation controlling the use of medicines and therapeutic devices. This study aimed to examine national legislation and regulations concerning the use of medications from a nursing perspective, focusing on the context of health service delivery in remote areas. Australian state and territory medicines legislation and regulations was interrogated for answers to the questions 'Can an RN prescribe a medication?', 'Can an RN dispense a medication?', 'Can an RN supply or issue a medication?' and 'Can an RN administer a medication?' Inconsistencies were identified nationally in the names and general structure of the legislation, the location of information relating to authorised roles with regards to medications and key terms used to describe medicines and the elements of the medication management cycle. Administrations of Schedule 4 and 8 medicine according to an order from an authorised prescriber are the only nationally consistent roles RNs are authorised to undertake with regards to medicines. Twenty-eight variations were identified with regards to additional authorisations for RNs. RNs make up more than half of the registered Australian health professional workforce and are the most consistently distributed across the nation, yet their legislated responsibilities in relation to working with medicines are inconsistent. Given the inconsistencies, RNs providing health care in remote Australia may be unable to undertake aspects of the medication management cycle that their work environment demands in the best interest of their patients and absence of other healthcare providers. The lack of legislative consistency nationally for medicines in Australia is likely to impede timely access to medications for patients. Regulatory inconsistencies may also result in RNs working well below or beyond their legal scope of practice, thereby creating clinical and workforce risks. Such risks are a significant matter for remote health service provision. Resolving these issues will require a collaborative national approach with consideration given to how the health workforce is distributed, current nursing responsibilities and relevant service delivery models for remote Australia.

Innovation in Healthcare, Innovation in Law: Does the Law Support Interprofessional Collaboration in Canadian Health Systems?

Interprofessional collaboration in healthcare describes a model of practice where multiple health professionals work together in a team-based approach to patient care. A growing body of literature demonstrates that interprofessional collaboration advances healthcare quality and safety, improves patient outcomes and experiences of care, and promotes job satisfaction among health professionals. Governments and health organisations across Canada are working to advance interprofessional healthcare delivery. This paper examines the importance of law in supporting a shift to interprofessional collaboration in Canadian healthcare and discusses two key aspects of the legal context in which health practitioners work. First, the paper discusses trends in the legal regulation of health professions in Canada, including law reform initiatives aimed at promoting collaborative practice and expanding scopes of practice to break down the historically siloed approach to healthcare delivery. Second, the papers examines civil liability rules that courts apply when allegations of negligence are made against health care providers working in team-based situations. New legislative models that provide for expanded and overlapping scopes of practice, and which introduce new professional roles into the health workforce, may raise legal concerns regarding responsibility for patient care and outcomes. The paper illustrates how legal innovations, such as new models of health profession regulation, and legal adaptability, through judicial understanding of the modern context of health service delivery, are important to the advancement of interprofessional collaboration in Canadian healthcare.

Drivers for renewal and reform of contemporary nursing curricula: A blueprint for change

The creation of a curriculum blueprint appropriate to the development of a professional nurse who is practice-ready for the current and future context of health service delivery must take account of the extant context as well as an unpredictable and sometimes ambiguous future. The curriculum renewal process itself ought to challenge existing long held ideals, practices, and sacred cows within the health and higher education sectors. There is much to consider and importantly curriculum developers need to be mindful of reform within the health sector and health workforce education, as well as the concomitant vision and requirements of the nursing profession. Curriculum must develop more than discipline knowledge and skills: it must provide an infrastructure for generic abilities both social and intellectual in order to better prepare students for the registered nurse role. This paper discusses a number of forces that are essential to consider in curriculum development in undergraduate nursing education.