Consortium Criteria Research Articles

The safety and efficacy of indobufen or aspirin combined with clopidogrel in patients with acute myocardial infarction after percutaneous coronary intervention

Abstract Background Currently, the standard treatment for patients who have undergone percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) following acute myocardial infarction (MI) involves dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with a combination of asprin and clopidogrel. However, the potential benefits of aspirin were limited by an increased risk of bleeding. The safety and efficacy of indobufen, an alternative antiplatelet agents to aspirin, in patients with AMI after PCI are yet to be thoroughly investigated. Methods This retrospective study was conducted at a single center and utilized propensity score matching. The enrollment spanned from January 2019 to June 2022, incorporating patients who experienced AMI following PCI. The participants were categorized into two groups based on their medication: the aspirin DAPT group and the indobufen DAPT group. The primary endpoint focused on net adverse clinical event (NACE) at one year, defined as a composite outcome, including cardiac death, recurrence of MI, definite or probable stent thrombosis (ST), target lesion revascularization (TLR), ischemic stroke and Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) criteria type 2, 3, or 5. Results A total of 1451 patients were enrolled in this study, with 258 assigned to the indobufen DAPT group and 1193 to the aspirin DAPT group. Following 1:1 propensity score matching, 224 patients were retained in each group and postmatching absolute standardized differences were consistantly below 10% for all covariates (Figure 1). The primary endpoint occurred in 58 (25.9%) individuals in indobufen DAPT group and 52 (23.2%) in the aspirin DAPT group (HR 1.128, 95% CI 0.776-1.639, p = 0.527, Figure 2). Specifically, no significant differences were observed in either the efficacy endpoint (MACCE, 20.1% vs. 14.7%, HR 1.392, 95% CI 0.893-2.170, p = 0.146) or the safety endpoint (BARC 2,3 or 5, 8.04% vs. 10.30%, HR 0.779, p=0.427). Conclusions The results of our study reveal no noteworthy distinctions in primary and secondary endpoints between the two groups. This finding indicates that the efficacy and safety of indobufen may be comparable to aspirin in Chinese patients with AMI after PCI, supporting its consideration as a potential substitute for aspirin in patients with AMI after PCI.

Antiplatelet can improve the short-term prognosis of type 2 myocardial infarction caused by acute respiratory failure

Abstract Background Type 2 myocardial infarction (T2MI) is characterized by myocardial infarction resulting from an imbalance between myocardial oxygen supply and demand, without the rupture of acute atherosclerotic plaque. Antiplatelet therapy is the cornerstone of treatment for Type 1 myocardial infarction, however, its efficacy in T2MI remains unclear. Purpose This study aimed to explore the impacts of antiplatelets on prognosis in patients with T2MI caused by acute respiratory failure. Methods The data for this study were derived from the Health and Medical Big Data Superplatform, comprising a retrospective cohort of patients admitted to and discharged from 72 secondary and tertiary hospitals from 2010 to 2023. A total of 4708 patients with T2MI due to acute respiratory failure were included. Participants were divided into two groups: those receiving antiplatelet therapy and those not. T2MI caused by acute respiratory failure was defined as NSTEMI patients caused by respiratory failure without percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance covariates between the groups, followed by building a multivariable Cox regression model to further adjust for potential confounders. Covariates adjusted in multivariable Cox regression included antiplatelet, anticoagulant, and lipid-lowering drug use during hospitalization, age, sex, KILLIP classification, history of diabetes, hypertension, percutaneous coronary intervention, stroke, renal insufficiency, cerebral hemorrhage, and atrial fibrillation. One-to-one matching was performed based on propensity scores using the nearest available pair matching method with a caliper width of 0.01. The primary endpoint was Net Adverse Clinical Events (NACE) within 1 month, including myocardial infarction, cardiac death, stroke and Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) criteria type 3 or 5. Results Following 1:1 propensity score matching, a total of 1418 participants were enrolled in the final study sample, with 709 patients retained in each group. Patients using antiplatelet were more likely to use ACEI/ARB, CCB, and β-blockers during hospitalization, all p<0.05.Compared to non-antiplatelet therapy group, the use of antiplatelet was associated with a 0.69 times risk of 1-month NACE (aHR, 0.69; p<0.001), a 0.69 times risk of 1-month Major Adverse Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Events (MACCE) (aHR, 0.69; p<0.001), a 0.70 times risk of 1-month cardiac death (aHR, 0.70; p<0.001), and a 0.70 times risk of 1-month all-cause mortality (aHR, 0.70; p<0.001); with no statistical significance for other clinical outcomes (p > 0.05) (Figure 1). Conclusions The present study suggested that patients receiving antiplatelet therapy had a lower incidence of one-month NACE, primarily due to a reduction in major cardiac death and MACCE at 1 month.

CMR predictors of acute right heart failure after LVAD implantation

Abstract Background Acute right heart failure (RHF) is one of the most dangerous complications after placement of left ventricular assisted device (LVAD), having a significant impact on prognosis, and is estimated to be around 3 to 35%. Even though right ventricular evaluation with hemodynamical and echocardiographic measurements is a key aspect prior to LVAD implantation, prediction of RHF remains a challenge in daily clinical practice. Purpose To identify cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) predictors of RHF after LVAD placement. Methods We retrospectively enrolled patients referred to our centre for implantation who also underwent CMR scan prior to LVAD implantation. Acute RHF was defined according to Mechanical Circulatory Support Academy Research Consortium (MRC ARC) criteria. Baseline characteristics, preoperative laboratory, echocardiographic, right heart catheterization (RHC) and CMR parameters were obtained. Patients were divided into two groups based on the development of acute RHF. The variables showing significant differences between the two groups were analysed with the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves to find the best cut-offs and then combined into a risk score. Results We enrolled 54 patients who underwent continuous-centrifugal flow LVAD implantation from 2013 to 2021 in whom a CMR within median time of 30 days pre-implantation was available. Four patients were excluded due to low quality images. Among the final cohort of 50 patients, 15 (28%) developed acute RHF. Patients who developed RHF showed worse INTERMACS class, worse renal and liver function, higher central venous pressure at RHC, worse TAPSE at echocardiography and overall smaller left ventricles at the CMR analysis when compared to those who had not acute RHF. No CMR derived right ventricle parameters nor moderate to severe tricuspid regurgitation at echocardiography were different among the two groups. We found that CMR-derived LV mass indexed < 65 g/m2, left ventricular end diastolic diameter (LVEDD) < 70 mm, and LV eccentricity index >1,12 were independent predictors of acute RHF. A CMR-derived score with these three parameters was built (1 point for each). This CMR score has shown to be an independent predictor of acute RHF at multivariate analysis with an odds ratio of 7,084 (CI 95%1.614-37.734) when corrected for other clinical and instrumental predictors of acute RHF. Conclusions Our study proposes a simple scoring system based on three CMR- derived parameters (LVEDD, LV mass indexed and LV eccentricity index) to screen for acute RHF prior LVAD implantation. This score shows promise to be an independent predictor of acute RHF, even when adjusted for clinical, echocardiographic, and haemodynamic parameters. Our model is built on CMR measurement of the LV, showing how patients with smaller ventricles and a left displacement of the interventricular septum (expressed with a higher LV eccentricity index) are at higher risk of developing acute RHF.ROC curves

Two different hybrid vascular access closure strategies post transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Abstract Background The hybrid strategy combining plug-based and suture-based vascular closure devices (VCD) was introduced as a promising technique for vascular access hemostasis after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) with satisfactory outcomes. However, data comparing two plug-based VCDs each in the combination with a suture-based VCD, namely ProGlide/FemoSeal (P/FS) with ProGlide/AngioSeal (P/AS) VCDs, is still lacking. Aim To compare the 30-day outcome of the hybrid strategy using P/AS versus P/FS for vascular access site closure after TAVI. Methods A retrospective single Centre observational study included 608 patients recruited from a prospective TAVI registry between 2016 and 2022. The composite endpoint was defined as any VCD related major vascular complications and/or bleeding more than type 1 according to Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC-3) criteria. Results The current study reported a significantly higher rate of composite endpoint in P/AS group, which was driven by higher rate of major bleeding (5.4% vs 1.4%, p=0.036). We also found a higher rate of VCD related minor bleeding in P/AS group (16.3% vs 8.1%, p=0.013). Successful access site hemostasis was achieved in 83.1% of P/FS group versus 71.7% in P/AS group (p=0.006). The presence of anterior wall calcification at the access site was significantly associated with the composite endpoint (adj OR 2.49; 95% CI (1.08 – 5.75), p=0.032). Conclusions The hybrid strategy for large bore vascular access closure using P/FS showed a potentially better 30-day outcomes compared with P/AS. The presence of anterior calcification at the access site carries a significant risk of VCD related complications.

Prognostic value of sarcopenia defined by the Sarcopenia Definitions and Outcomes Consortium criteria in patients with heart failure

Abstract Background Sarcopenia, the loss of skeletal muscle mass and function, is recognized as a negative prognostic factor in heart failure patients. Current guidelines, such as those by the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia (AWGS), emphasize quantifying muscle mass using methods like bioelectrical impedance analysis or dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, known for their precision. In contrast, the Sarcopenia Definitions and Outcomes Consortium (SDOC) focuses on functional parameters. However, its applicability and effectiveness as a prognostic indicator in heart failure remain uncertain. Purpose To determine the prognostic utility of sarcopenia determined by the SDOC diagnostic criteria in predicting all-cause mortality among older patients with heart failure, and to compare its prognostic predictability with that of the AWGS 2019 diagnostic algorithms. Methods This was a post-hoc analysis of the FRAGILE-HF study, a prospective, multicenter, observational study involving patients aged ≥65 years hospitalized for heart failure. Sarcopenia was diagnosed according to two definitions: AWGS 2019 guidelines criteria and the SDOC criteria, which diagnose sarcopenia based only on grip strength and gait speed. With SDOC criteria, patients were divided into three groups: sarcopenia (low grip strength and decreased gait speed), pre-sarcopenia (low grip strength or decreased gait speed), and non-sarcopenia (normal grip strength and normal gait speed) groups. Two logistic models for the primary outcome were constructed by adding the information on pre-sarcopenia and sarcopenia defined by AWGS 2019 and SDOC to the MAGGIC-HF risk score + log BNP, and prognostic predictability was compared by receiver operating characteristic curve areas under the curve (ROC-AUC) and net-reclassification improvement (NRI) between three models. The primary outcome was 2-year mortality. Results Of 1282 study patients, pre-sarcopenia and sarcopenia were diagnosed in 357 and 786 individuals, respectively, according to SDOC criteria. The Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed a significant stepwise association between the sarcopenic status and the primary outcome. The adjusted Cox proportional hazards analysis indicated a significant stepwise association between sarcopenic status and mortality risk (pre-sarcopenia, hazard ratio [HR]: 1.22, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.66–2.28, P= 0.525; sarcopenia, HR: 1.89, 95% CI: 1.08–3.34, P= 0.027). No significant difference was observed in the prognostic capabilities between the two models adding sarcopenia defined by SDOC and AWGS 2019 diagnostic criteria to the model incorporating the MAGGIC-HF risk score + log BNP (NRI: -0.009, 95% CI: -0.193–0.174, P=0.920, with ROC-AUC of 0.697 for SDOC and 0.703 for AWGS 2019, P=0.675, respectively). Conclusion Diagnosing sarcopenia with the SDOC criteria, which does not include muscle mass, provides incremental prognostic information as same as that defined by AWGS 2019 criteria.Figure

Transcatheter Valve Repair for TricuspidRegurgitation: 1-Year Results from a Large European Real-World Registry.

Tricuspid valve transcatheter edge-to-edge repair has emerged as a valuable treatment option for patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR). This study aims to investigate the safety and effectiveness of the PASCAL transcatheter valve repair system in treating severe TR in a real-world patient population. The PASTE (PASCAL for Tricuspid Regurgitation-a European registry) study is an investigator-initiated, multicenter, retrospective, and prospective observational cohort analysis conducted across 16 European heart valve centers including consecutive patients treated with the PASCAL transcatheter valve repair system from February 2019 to November 2023. Echocardiographic assessments were performed at baseline, discharge, and follow-up, and were subjected to centralized analysis. The study included 1,059 high-risk patients (mean age 79 ± 9 years; 53% female; TRI-SCORE risk 23% ± 18%; 87% NYHA functional class III/IV) with multiple comorbidities. Severe or higher graded TR was observed in 96% of patients. Intraprocedural success according to Tricuspid Valve Academic Research Consortium criteria was achieved in 85%, and TR reduced to ≤moderate in 87%. Independent predictors for a postprocedure residual TR of >moderate were coaptation gaps≥8mm (OR: 1.67; 95%CI: 1.03-2.72; P=0.038), tenting height≥10mm (OR: 2.18; CI: 1.30-3.65; P=0.003), the presence of a transvalvular lead (OR: 1.91; 95% CI: 1.19-3.05; P=0.007), right ventricular dilatation >42mm (OR: 3.35; 95% CI: 1.37-9.1; P=0.009) and massive/torrential TR at baseline (OR: 4.59; 95% CI:2.35-8.96; P< 0.001). At 1 year, 83% of patients showed ≤moderate TR. Significant clinical improvements included enhanced NYHA functional class (66% class I/II vs 17% at baseline; P< 0.001). Patients treated with the first-generation PASCAL system (n = 570) and with the new PASCAL Precision system (n = 489) had similar clinical profiles and TR severity at baseline. However, the Precision cohort showed greater TR reduction to trace/mild (63% vs 49%; P< 0.001), shorter procedure times (median 93minutes [Q1-Q3: 69-130 minutes] vs 120minutes [Q1-Q3: 82-165 minutes]; P< 0.001), and higher clinical success rates according to the Tricuspid Valve Academic Research Consortium at 30days and 1 year (87% vs 81% [P=0.021] and 56% vs 50% [P=0.044], respectively). Higher center experience (≥21 patients/year) resulted in higher intraprocedural and clinical success. The PASCAL system effectively treats severe TR in high-risk patients, offering sustained TR reduction and significant clinical improvements at 1-year follow-up. (PASCAL for Tricuspid Regurgitation-a European registry [PASTE]; NCT05328284).

Influence of vascular graft type for ascending aorta replacement on the early postoperative outcome.

Aim of this study was to find out if the type of vascular prosthesis used, especially collagen impregnated polyester versus gelatin impregnated woven fabric graft, has any impact on the early postoperative bleeding rate, blood product consumption and re-thoracotomy rate in isolated ascending aortic surgery. n = 46 consecutive patients who received a supra-commissural replacement of the ascending aorta between 01/2016 - 01/ 2021 were included in this retrospective single-center study. The underlying pathology was an aortic aneurysm in 36 (81 %) and/or an acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) limited to the ascending aorta in 7 (15 %) and/or a penetrating aortic ulcer (PAU) with intramural hematoma in 6 (13 %) patients. According to the type of vascular graft used, the cohort was divided as follows: 25 patients (54%) received a double velour woven, collagen impregnated polyester graft (Hemashield, Getinge; CI-Group) whereas in 21 patients (46 %) a gelatin impregnated woven fabric graft was used (Gelweave, Vascutek / Terumo; GI-group). As primary endpoints class 3 bleeding according to the Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC3) criteria and freedom from re-intervention were assessed. As secondary endpoints, 30-day mortality and stroke were defined. Preoperative risk assessment (EuroSCORE II), gender-, BMI-stratification and NYHA-classification as well as mean CPB-times (114 ± 44min vs 110 ± 48min) and aortic cross-clamp times (71 ± 28min vs 66 ± 30min) were similar in both groups. Bleeding, measured by drainage volume output within the first postoperative 24h (480 ± 426mL vs 389 ± 169mL), erythrocytes concentrate consumption (2,4 vs 2,3) and similar re-thoracotomy rates (4 vs 4.7 %) showed no difference between groups. 30- day mortality (12 vs 5 %; p = 0.614) and stroke rates (4 vs 9.5; p = 0,4) showed no differences between groups. Regarding postoperative bleeding no difference were seen between the two graft types. Long-term follow-up and larger prospective randomized studies are requested to prove these findings.

ProGlide-AngioSeal versus ProGlide-FemoSeal for vascular access hemostasis posttranscatheter aortic valve implantation.

The hybrid strategy combining plug-based and suture-based vascular closure devices (VCD) was introduced as a promising technique for vascular access hemostasis after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) with satisfactory outcomes. However, data comparing two plug-based VCDs each in the combination with a suture-based VCD, namely ProGlide/AngioSeal (P/AS) with ProGlide/FemoSeal (P/FS) VCDs, is still lacking. To compare the 30-day outcome of the hybrid strategy using P/AS versus P/FS for vascular access site closure after TAVI. A retrospective single-center observational study included 608 patients recruited from a prospective TAVI registry between 2016 and 2022. The composite endpoint was defined as any VCD-related major vascular complications and/or bleeding more than type 1 according to Valve Academic Research Consortium criteria. The current study reported a significantly higher rate of composite endpoint in P/AS group, which was driven by a higher rate of major bleeding (5.4% vs. 1.4%, p = 0.036). We also found a higher rate of VCD-related minor bleeding in P/AS group (16.3% vs. 8.1%, p = 0.013). Successful access site hemostasis was achieved in 71.7% of P/AS group versus 83.1% in P/FS group (p = 0.006). The presence of anterior wall calcification at the access site was significantly associated with the composite endpoint (adj odds ratio 2.49; 95% confidence interval (1.08-5.75), p = 0.032). The hybrid strategy for large bore vascular access closure using P/FS showed a potentially better 30-day outcomes compared with P/AS. The presence of anterior calcification at the access site carries a significant risk of VCD-related complications.

Cangrelor versus crushed ticagrelor in patients with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock: rationale and design of the randomised, double-blind DAPT-SHOCK-AMI trial.

Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a devastating and fatal complication of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). CS can affect the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of medications. The unique properties of cangrelor make it the optimal P2Y12 inhibitor for CS-AMI, in terms of both efficacy and safety. The DAPT-SHOCK-AMI trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03551964; EudraCT: 2018-002161-19) will assess the benefits of cangrelor in patients with an initial CS-AMI undergoing primary angioplasty. This randomised, multicentre, placebo-controlled trial of approximately 550 patients (with an allowed 10% increase) in 5 countries using a double-blind design will compare initial P2Y12 inhibitor treatment strategies in patients with CS-AMI of (A) intravenous cangrelor and (B) ticagrelor administered as crushed tablets at a loading dose of 180 mg. The primary clinical endpoint is a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), or stroke within 30 days. The main secondary endpoints are (1) the net clinical endpoint, defined as death, MI, urgent revascularisation of the infarct-related artery, stroke, or major bleeding as defined by the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium criteria; (2) cardiovascular-related death, MI, urgent revascularisation, or heart failure; (3) heart failure; and (4) cardiovascular-related death, all (1-4) within 1 year after study enrolment. A platelet reactivity study that tests the laboratory antiplatelet benefits of cangrelor, when given in addition to standard antiplatelet therapy, will be conducted using vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein phosphorylation. The primary laboratory endpoints are the periprocedural rate of onset and the proportion of patients who achieve effective P2Y12 inhibition. The DAPT-SHOCK-AMI study is the first randomised trial to evaluate the benefits of cangrelor in patients with CS-AMI.

Percutaneous coronary intervention vs. medical therapy in patients on dialysis with coronary artery disease in China.

The available evidence regarding the benefits of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) on patients receiving dialysis with coronary artery disease (CAD) is limited and inconsistent. This study aimed to evaluate the association between PCI and clinical outcomes as compared with medical therapy alone in patients undergoing dialysis with CAD in China. This multicenter, retrospective study was conducted in 30 tertiary medical centers across 12 provinces in China from January 2015 to June 2021 to include patients on dialysis with CAD. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), defined as a composite of cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and non-fatal stroke. Secondary outcomes included all-cause death, the individual components of MACE, and Bleeding Academic Research Consortium criteria types 2, 3, or 5 bleeding. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard models were used to assess the association between PCI and outcomes. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) and propensity score matching (PSM) were performed to account for potential between-group differences. Of the 1146 patients on dialysis with significant CAD, 821 (71.6%) underwent PCI. After a median follow-up of 23.0months, PCI was associated with a 43.0% significantly lower risk for MACE (33.9% [n=278] vs. 43.7% [n=142]; adjusted hazards ratio 0.57, 95% confidence interval 0.45-0.71), along with a slightly increased risk for bleeding outcomes that did not reach statistical significance (11.1% vs. 8.3%; adjusted hazards ratio 1.31, 95% confidence interval, 0.82-2.11). Furthermore, PCI was associated with a significant reduction in all-cause and cardiovascular mortalities. Subgroup analysis did not modify the association of PCI with patient outcomes. These primary findings were consistent across IPTW, PSM, and competing risk analyses. This study indicated that PCI in patients on dialysis with CAD was significantly associated with lower MACE and mortality when comparing with those with medical therapy alone, albeit with a slightly increased risk for bleeding events that did not reach statistical significance.

Myotonometric assessment of peroneus longus muscle mechanical properties during contraction in athletes with and without chronic ankle instability

Our recent findings in athletes with chronic ankle instability (CAI) revealed increased tone and stiffness alongside reduced elasticity in the peroneus longus (PL) during myotonometric (MYO) measurements at rest, suggesting diagnostic relevance. MYO recordings during muscle contraction in healthy subjects showed an active muscle stiffness influence on MYO parameters, suggesting its potential impact on CAI-related MYO findings. However, it remains unknown whether PL stiffening observed recently in CAI athletes at rest can also be detected while PL muscle contraction. This study, using myotonometry, examines the PL mechanical properties during a motor task mimicking PL’s biomechanical function, i.e., simultaneous isometric foot pronation and plantar flexion (IFPPF) at 30 % and 100 % of maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) in athletes with CAI. Nineteen adult male athletes with CAI (per International Ankle Consortium criteria) and 19 control (CO) athletes without lateral ankle sprain incidents comprised the study groups. Both groups had similar anthropometric parameters and training volume. Simultaneous force and MYO measurements were performed at 30 % and 100 % of MVC-IFPPF, using a MyotonPRO® device. Five MYO parameters were recorded in the PL: frequency, stiffness, decrement, relaxation time, and creep. No significant inter-group differences were observed in MYO parameters and force values measured during the 30 % and 100 % of MVC-IFPPF. This study, employing myotonometry, is the first to demonstrate the lack of significant differences between CAI and CO athletes in the MYO parameters measured in the PL muscle at submaximal and maximal contraction during simultaneous IFPPF, contrasting with our previous MYO results in CAI at rest.

Clustering of clinical symptoms using large language models reveals low diagnostic specificity of proposed alternatives to consensus mast cell activation syndrome criteria

The rate of diagnosis of mast cell activation syndrome (MCAS) has increased since the disorder's original description as a mastocytosis-like phenotype. While a set of consortium MCAS criteria is well described and widely accepted, this increase occurs in the setting of a broader set of proposed alternative MCAS criteria. Effective diagnostic criteria must minimize the range of unrelated diagnoses that can be erroneously classified as the condition of interest. We sought to determine if the symptoms associated with alternative MCAS criteria result in less concise or consistent diagnostic alternatives, reducing diagnostic specificity. We used multiple large language models, including ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini, to bootstrap the probabilities of diagnoses that are compatible with consortium or alternative MCAS criteria. We utilized diversity and network analysis to quantify diagnostic precision and specificity compared to control diagnostic criteria including systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), Kawasaki disease, and migraines. Compared to consortium MCAS criteria, alternative MCAS criteria are associated with more variable (Shannon diversity 5.8 vs. 4.6, respectively; p-value=0.004) and less precise (mean Bray-Curtis similarity 0.07 vs 0.19, respectively; p-value=0.004) diagnoses. The diagnosis networks derived from consortium and alternative MCAS criteria had lower between-network similarity compared to the similarity between diagnosis networks derived from two distinct SLE criteria (cosine similarity 0.55 vs. 0.86, respectively; p-value=0.0022). Alternative MCAS criteria are associated with a distinct set of diagnoses compared to consortium MCAS criteria and have lower diagnostic consistency. This lack of specificity is pronounced in relation to multiple control criteria, raising the concern that alternative criteria could disproportionately contribute to MCAS overdiagnosis, to the exclusion of more appropriate diagnoses.

Clinical Outcomes for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (mRCC) Patients Ineligible for Front-line Clinical Trials.

Clinical trials for immunotherapy-based regimens in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) have extensive inclusion and exclusion criteria. We investigated the clinical outcomes in a real-world cohort of patients who would not have met the criteria for inclusion in front-line mRCC trials. Patients treated with ipilimumab/nivolumab and axitinib/pembrolizumab for front-line mRCC were identified and divided into clinical trial eligible (CTE) and clinical trial ineligible (CTI) cohorts based on key inclusion or exclusion criteria from their respective Phase-3 registration trials. Clinical outcomes were compared in CTE and CTI cohorts. A total of 62 patients treated with axitinib/pembrolizumab and 103 treated with ipilimumab/nivolumab were identified. The International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC) criteria were similar across CTE and CTI patients in axitinib/pembrolizumab and ipilimumab/nivolumab cohorts. In the axitinib/pembrolizumab cohort (n = 62), 24 (39%) patients were CTI. The major reasons for the ineligibility were lab abnormalities (n = 11), histology (n = 9), and brain metastases (n = 3). There was no significant difference in response rates (P = 0.08). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was numerically longer in CTE patients (28 vs 12 months; P = 0.09). The overall survival (OS) was higher in the CTE patients (P = 0.02). In the ipilimumab/nivolumab cohort (n = 103), 59 (57%) were CTI. The most common reasons for ineligibility were brain metastases (n = 18), lab abnormalities (n = 16), and histology (n = 16). There was no significant difference in response rates (P = 0.22). However, PFS (P = 0.003) and OS (P < 0.0001) were higher in the CTE patients. In conclusion, many real-world patients are ineligible for RCC clinical trials and had worse outcomes when compared to trial-eligible patients. Additional treatment options are needed for these patients, as well as strategies to include them in prospective trials.

Novel insights on dual antiplatelet therapy duration following stenting for angiography-detected moderate-to-severe calcified coronary lesions

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), comprising both aspirin and the P2Y12 receptor inhibitor, is crucial in managing patients with coronary artery disease following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The optimal duration for DAPT in patients with angiography-detected moderate-to-severe calcified coronary (MSCC) lesions who underwent PCI with drug-eluting stents (DES) implantation remains uncertain. We recruited patients with angiography-detected MSCC lesions who received DES implantation from the prospective Fuwai Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Registry. Patients were classified into two groups according to the duration of DAPT: those with a DAPT duration of one year or less, and those with a DAPT duration of more than one year. The primary endpoint was the major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular event, which was defined as composed of all-cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke. The key-safety endpoint was bleeding type 2, 3, or 5 according to the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium criteria. There were 1730 patients included in the study, and 470 (27.17 %) continued DAPT for more than one year after undergoing MSCC-PCI with DES implantation. The median follow-up time was 2.5 years. DAPT>1-year versus ≤1-year DAPT was significantly associated with a reduced risk of the primary outcome (1.59 % versus 3.19 %; adjusted hazard ratio=0.44; 95 % CI: 0.22–0.88). Similar trends were observed for all-cause death (0.16 % versus 1.91 %; P<0.001) and cardiovascular death (0.08 % versus 1.06 %; P=0.001). There was no significant difference in the key-safety endpoint between 2 regimens (1.75 % versus 0.85 %; adjusted hazard ratio=1.95; 95 % CI: 0.65–5.84). In conclusion, long-term DAPT after DES implantation in patients with MSCC lesions resulted in improved clinical outcomes at 2.5 years. This was achieved by reducing the risk of ischemia without increasing clinically significant bleeding.

Development and Validation of a Risk Score for Predicting ICU Admission in Adults with New-Onset Encephalitis.

Timely intensive care unit (ICU) admission for patients with encephalitis is associated with better prognosis. Therefore, our aim was to create a risk score predicting ICU admission in adults with encephalitis, which could aid in optimal management and resource allocation. We initially identified variables that would be most predictive of ICU admission among 372 patients with encephalitis from two hospital systems in Houston, Texas (cohort 1), who met the International Encephalitis Consortium (IEC) criteria from 2005 to 2023. Subsequently, we used a binary logistic regression model to create a risk score for ICU admission, which we then validated externally using a separate cohort of patients from two hospitals in Baltimore, Maryland (cohort 2), who met the IEC criteria from 2006 to 2022. Of 634 patients with encephalitis, 255 (40%) were admitted to the ICU, including 45 of 113 (39.8%) patients with an autoimmune cause, 100 of 272 (36.7%) with an infectious cause, and 110 of 249 (44.1%) with an unknown cause (p = 0.225). After conducting a multivariate analysis in cohort 1, we found that the presence of focal neurological signs, new-onset seizure, a Full Outline of Unresponsiveness score ≤ 14, leukocytosis, and a history of chronic kidney disease at admission were associated with an increased risk of ICU admission. The resultant clinical score for predicting ICU admission had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.77 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.72-0.82, p < 0.001). Patients were classified into three risk categories for ICU admission: low risk (score 0, 12.5%), intermediate risk (scores 1-5, 49.5%), and high risk (scores 6-8, 87.5%). External validation in cohort 2 yielded an AUROC of 0.76 (95% CI 0.69-0.83, p < 0.001). ICU admission is common in patients with encephalitis, regardless of etiology. Our risk score, encompassing neurologic and systemic factors, may aid physicians in decisions regarding intensity of care for adult patients with encephalitis upon hospital admission.

Outcomes after transcatheter mitral valve implantation in valve-in-valve, valve-in-ring, and valve-in-mitral annular calcification.

We aimed to evaluate transcatheter mitral valve implantation (TMVI) using predominantly balloon-expandable transcatheter heart valves (THV) in patients with a landing zone for a percutaneously delivered prosthesis. Patients with a degenerated mitral valve bioprosthesis, annuloplasty ring, and mitral annulus calcification (MAC) considered at high surgical risk currently represent a treatment challenge. TMVI is an alternative treatment option. Retrospective analysis of patients with symptomatic degenerated mitral valve bioprosthesis, or annuloplasty ring, and MAC treated with TMVI between November 2011 and April 2021. Endpoints were defined according to Mitral Valve Academic Research Consortium (MVARC) criteria and included device and procedure success at 30 days as well as mortality at 30 days and 1 year after the procedure. A total of 77 patients underwent TMVI (valve in valve [ViV = 56], valve in ring [ViR = 11], and valve in MAC [ViMAC = 10]). There was a trend toward higher technical success (all = 93.5%, ViV = 96.4%, ViR = 90.9%, ViMAC = 80%, p = 0.06) and lower 30-day (all = 11.7%, ViV = 10.7%, ViR = 9.1%, ViMAC = 20%, p = 0.49) and 1-year mortality (all = 26%, ViV = 23.2%, ViR = 27.3%, ViMAC= 40%, p = 0.36) after ViV and ViR compared to ViMAC. TMVI represents a reasonable treatment option in selected patients with MAC or who are poor candidates for redo mitral valve surgery. Technical success and survival up to 1 year were not significantly dependent on the subgroup in which TMVI was performed.

A case of uncommon metastasis located posterior to the seminal vesicles in renal cell carcinoma.

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is known for its potential to metastasize to various sites but metastasis to the area posterior to the seminal vesicles is exceedingly rare. We present the case of a 44year-old male patient with a history of clear cell RCC (ccRCC) who was found to have suspected metastases to the region posterior to the seminal vesicles and the greater omentum during follow-up after radical nephrectomy. The patient was classified as having a favorable risk according to the International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium criteria. Due to the rarity of this metastasis site, a treatment strategy combining immune-oncology therapy and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (IO-TKI) was initiated. This treatment led to significant reduction of the metastatic lesions, allowing for their complete removal via laparoscopic surgery. Pathologic examination confirmed that the metastatic lesions were consistent with primary ccRCC. No clinical progression was observed 2months postoperatively. This case highlights the rare occurrence of ccRCC metastasizing posterior to the seminal vesicles and demonstrates the potential effectiveness of combined IO-TKI therapy followed by surgical resection in treating such atypical metastases.

Safety and efficacy of single antiplatelet therapy in a large cohort of patients treated with sirolimus-coated balloon: Post hoc analysis from the prospective EASTBOURNE registry

BackgroundDrug coated balloons (DCB) are potentially less thrombogenic than drug eluting stents (DES). AimsTo explore the safety and the feasibility of single antiplatelet therapy in percutaneous coronary intervention with sirolimus-coated balloons. MethodsThe All-comers Sirolimus-coated Balloon European Registry (EASTBOURNE) is a prospective investigator-driven registry assessing the performance of a novel sirolimus-coated balloon (SCB) in a real-world population. This prespecified post hoc analysis aimed at comparing the outcome in patients prescribed either single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) or dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT); choice of antiplatelet agent and duration of the regimen were at operator's discretion in both groups. Primary endpoint was target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 12 months. Secondary endpoints were bleeding grade 3–5 according to The Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) criteria and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) at 12 months follow-up. ResultsAmong 2123 patients enrolled in the study between September 2016 and November 2020, 113 patients (5.8 %) received SAPT while 1826 patients (94.1 %) received DAPT after SCB. The majority of the patients underwent DCB PCI for de novo lesions (n = 1091, 56.3 %) while 848 patients (47.7 %) had DCB revascularization for in-stent restenosis. No cases of TLR occurred in the SAPT group within one month after the index procedure, and no acute occlusive events were recorded during follow up in patients taking a single antiplatelet agent. Moreover, no differences in terms of TLR were observed between SAPT vs DAPT regimens nor in case of de novo treatment with an overall rate of TLR at 12 months of 7.7 % for SAPT and 5.6 % for DAPT (p = 0.6). The cumulative rate of MACE at 12 months was not different between SAPT and DAPT regimens (n = 12 [11.2 %] vs. n = 162 [8.9 %], p = 0.4), and results were consistent in the de novo and in-stent restenosis groups. ConclusionsOur post hoc analysis of the EASTBOURNE registry suggests that the use of single antiplatelet agent after sirolimus-DCB PCI for both de novo or in-stent restenosis lesions is safe and effective and can help to contain the risk of bleeding in a selected population. Condensed abstractThe manuscript aims to explore the feasibility of a single antiplatelet regimen following angioplasty using drug coated balloon with sirolimus. Among 2123 patients treated with sirolimus coated balloon (SCB), 113 patients (5.8 %) received a single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) while 1826 patients (94.1 %) received dual antiplatelet therapy DAPT. No cases of target lesion revascularization occurred in the SAPT group within one month after the index procedure, and no acute occlusive events were recorded during follow up in patients taking a single antiplatelet agent. The cumulative rate of major adverse cardiovascular events at 12 months was not different between SAPT and DAPT regimens and results were consistent in the de novo and in-stent restenosis groups.

The safety and efficacy of indobufen or aspirin combined with clopidogrel in patients with acute myocardial infarction after percutaneous coronary intervention

Currently, the standard treatment for patients who have undergone percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) following acute myocardial infarction (MI) involves dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with a combination of aspirin and a potent P2Y12 receptor inhibitor. However, the potential benefits of aspirin were partially constrained by the intolerance of some patients. The safety and efficacy of indobufen, an alternative antiplatelet agents to aspirin, in patients with AMI after PCI are yet to be thoroughly investigated. This retrospective study was conducted at a single center and utilized propensity score matching. The enrollment spanned from January 2019 to June 2022, incorporating patients with AMI after PCI. The participants were categorized into two groups based on discharged prescriptions: the aspirin DAPT group and the indobufen DAPT group. The primary endpoint focused on net adverse clinical event (NACE), defined as a composite outcome, including cardiac death, recurrence of MI, definite or probable stent thrombosis (ST), target lesion revascularization (TLR), ischemic stroke and Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) criteria type 2, 3, or 5. All the patients underwent a one-year follow-up period. A total of 1451 patients were enrolled in this study, with 258 assigned to the indobufen DAPT group and 1193 to the aspirin DAPT group. Following 1:1 propensity score matching, 224 patients were retained in each group. In the indobufen DAPT group, 58 individuals (25.9%) experienced the primary endpoint within one year, compared to 52 individuals (23.2%) in the aspirin DAPT group (HR 1.128, 95% CI 0.776–1.639, p = .527). Specifically, no significant differences were observed in either the efficacy endpoint (MACCE, 20.1% vs. 14.7%, HR 1.392, 95% CI 0.893–2.170, p = .146) or the safety endpoint (BARC 2,3 or 5, 8.04% vs. 10.30%, HR 0.779, p = .427). These findings remained consistent at 1, 3, or 6 months. Additionally, the incidence of gastrointestinal symptoms were significantly lower in indobufen DAPT group compared to the aspirin DAPT group (7.1% vs. 14.3%, p = .022). Our research reveals that the efficacy and safety of indobufen are comparable to aspirin in Chinese patients with AMI following PCI. Given the potential advantages of indobufen in alleviating gastrointestinal symptoms, we propose it as a viable alternative for individuals intolerant to aspirin.

Incidence of Arterial Thrombotic and Bleeding Events in Patients Who Develop Cancer after ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction.

Objective Cancers increase the risk of both arterial thrombosis and bleeding. The present study investigated whether or not comorbid new-onset cancers increase arterial thrombosis and bleeding events in patients after ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Methods Among 918 consecutive STEMI patients, excluding 300 who used mechanical hemodynamic supportive devices, the 67 with cancer and 851 without cancer were compared with respect to the frequency of thrombotic events, consisting of myocardial infarction (MI) and ischemic stroke, and bleeding events during the trackable observation period in this observational study. The predictive accuracy for bleeding events evaluated by the Academic Research Consortium (ARC) high bleeding risk (HBR) criteria and the patients receiving stent implantation and subsequent dual antiplatelet therapy (PRECISE-DAPT) score was assessed by C-statistics. Bleeding events were defined as type 3 or 5 according to the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium criteria. Results During the 1,233.3±1,284.4-day observation period, thrombotic events were observed in 13.4% of patients with cancer and 7.1% of patients without cancer (p=0.06; incidence rates, 2.4 vs. 2.4/100 person-years). MI and ischemic stroke were observed in 6.0% of patients with cancer and 3.5% of patients without cancer (p=0.23; incidence rates, 1.0 vs. 1.2/100 person-years) and 7.5% of patients with cancer and 3.6% of patients without cancer (p=0.18; incidence rates, 1.0 vs. 1.2/100 person-years), respectively. Bleeding events were observed in 26.9% of patients with cancer and 7.6% of patients without cancer (p<0.01; incidence rates, 4.4 vs. 2.4/100 person-years). The C-statistics for predicting bleeding events in patients with and without cancer were 0.65 vs. 0.71 using the ARC-HBR criteria and 0.67 vs. 0.71 using the PRECISE-DAPT scores, respectively. Conclusion Cancers increase unpredictable bleeding but not arterial thrombotic events in patients after STEMI.