Consensus Treatment Plans Research Articles

Juvenile Dermatomyositis: Updates in Pathogenesis and Biomarkers, Current Treatment, and Emerging Targeted Therapies.

Juvenile dermatomyositis is a rare systemic inflammatory autoimmune disease involving muscle, skin, and vessels. Most patients do not fully respond to initial therapy, instead having a chronic refractory or polycyclic disease course. Pathogenesis is not completely understood, but immune cell dysregulation, particularly of B cells, mitochondrial dysfunction, changes in neutrophils and neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs), and increased type I and type II interferon (IFN) signaling have been described. There are limited randomized controlled trials of drugs in juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM), and treatment is largely based on lower-quality data such as case series, retrospective studies, and open-label prospective studies. These data have been compiled into expert recommendations or consensus treatment plans, which help guide therapy. While initial therapy is more standard with most including corticosteroids (high-dose oral and/or pulse intravenous methylprednisolone) and methotrexate, for refractory patients, guidelines are more varied with multiple options or combinations, including biologic therapies. There is a clear need for more efficacious and personalized therapy in JDM. Emerging treatment options worthy of further study in JDMinclude targetingIFN-signaling (JAK, IFNAR1, IFN beta),B-cells (CD20, CD19, BAFF, TACI, CD38, BCMA)including Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy, mitochondrial dysfunction, and NETs.

Implementation study of the CARRA Uveitis Consensus Treatment Plans: feasibility for clinical practice and applicability for research

BackgroundChronic anterior uveitis (CAU) carries a significant risk for eye complications and vision loss. The Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance (CARRA) introduced consensus treatment plans (CTPs) to standardize treatment for CAU and facilitate future comparative effectiveness studies. Two CTPs were developed to address: 1) initiation of methotrexate (MTX) in patients with CAU naïve to steroid-sparing therapy, and 2) initiation of a TNF inhibitor (TNFi) in patients with severe uveitis or uveitis refractory to MTX. We evaluated implementation of the uveitis CTPs using existing CARRA Registry infrastructure and assessed feasibility of the CTPs for comparative effectiveness research.MethodsThis prospective observational cohort study was conducted at nine pilot sites between February 2020 and August 2022. Patients with JIA-associated CAU (JIA-U) were treated according to either the MTX or TNFi CTP. Uveitis activity and medication use were recorded at 0, 3, and 6 months. We assessed patient enrollment rates, CTP arm selection, uveitis control, and quality of data collection. We also evaluated CTP arm selection in a retrospective cohort of similar JIA-U patients enrolled in the CARRA Registry during the same study period.ResultsSeventeen patients were included in the pilot cohort. Eight were treated with the MTX CTP (4 oral MTX, 4 subcutaneous MTX), and 9 with the TNFi CTP (9 received standard-dose adalimumab, none selected high-dose adalimumab or infliximab). Uveitis was controlled in 13 of 17 patients by 6 months. Query of the CARRA-wide Registry identified 42 patients with JIA-U who were treated according to the MTX or TNFi CTPs. Among these, 26 were treated with MTX (8 oral, 18 subcutaneous) and 16 with TNFi (12 standard dose adalimumab, 2 high dose adalimumab, and 2 infliximab).ConclusionBoth the MTX and TNFi uveitis CTPs can practically be implemented in clinical settings and are currently being utilized across Registry sites. However, in patients starting TNFi therapy, all pilot study participants and most patients across the CARRA Registry were treated with a standard dose of adalimumab. This consensus on the treatment approach underscores its broad acceptance but also limits the applicability of the uveitis TNFi CTP for comparative effectiveness research.

Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance Biologic Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drug Consensus Treatment Plans for Refractory Moderately Severe Juvenile Dermatomyositis.

The objective was to develop consensus treatment plans (CTPs) for patients with refractory moderately severe juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM) treated with biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs). The Biologics Workgroup of the Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance JDM Research Committee used case-based surveys, consensus framework, and nominal group technique to produce bDMARD CTPs for patients with refractory moderately severe JDM. Four bDMARD CTPs were proposed: tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα) inhibitor (adalimumab or infliximab), abatacept, rituximab, and tocilizumab. Each CTP has different options for dosing and/or route. Among 76 respondents, consensus was achieved for the proposed CTPs (93% [67 of 72]) as well as for patient characteristics, assessments, outcome measures, and follow-up. By weighted average, respondents indicated that they would most likely administer rituximab, followed by abatacept, TNFα inhibitor, and tocilizumab. CTPs for the administration of bDMARDs in refractory moderately severe JDM were developed using consensus methodology. The implementation of the bDMARD CTPs will lay the groundwork for registry-based prospective comparative effectiveness studies.

Treatment of systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis.

Systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA) is an inflammatory disease with hallmarks of severe systemic inflammation, which can be accompanied by arthritis. Contemporary scientific insights set this paediatric disorder on a continuum with its counterpart, adult-onset Still disease (AOSD). Patients with sJIA are prone to complications, including life-threatening hyperinflammation (macrophage activation syndrome (sJIA-MAS)) and sJIA-associated lung disease (sJIA-LD). Meanwhile, the treatment arsenal in sJIA has expanded markedly. State-of-the-art therapeutic approaches include biologic agents thattarget the IL-1 and IL-6 pathways. Beyond these, a range of novel agents are on the horizon, some of them already being used on a compassionate use basis, including JAK inhibitors and biologic agents thattarget IL-18, IFNγ, or IL-1β and IL-18 simultaneously. However, sJIA, sJIA-MAS and sJIA-LD still pose challenging conundrums to rheumatologists treatingpaediatric and adult patients worldwide. Although national and international consensus treatment plans exist for the treatment of 'classic' sJIA, the treatment approaches for early sJIA without arthritis, and forrefractory or complicated sJIA, are not well defined. Therefore, in this Review we outline current approaches for the treatment of sJIA and provide an outlook on knowledge gaps.

Treat-to-target strategies for the management of familial Mediterranean Fever in children

BackgroundThe objective of this initiative was to develop a treat-to-target (T2T) approach for the management of patients with Familial Mediterranean Fever (FMF), including the definition of a complex treatment target, and establish strategies that improve patient care and long-term outcome.MethodsAn initial set of statements as well as a flow chart visualising the proposed concept was developed. To adapt the preliminary statements to the current state of knowledge, a systematic literature search was performed and the modified statements were subject to a Delphi approach. To ensure the applicability of the statements in daily practice, an online survey was conducted among paediatric rheumatologists in Germany. In addition, data from the national AID-NET registry were analysed with respect to therapeutic response.ResultsThis T2T initiative yielded a total of 26 statements guiding FMF management with respect to diagnosis, treatment targets, treatment strategies and monitoring. The online survey identified cut-off values for inflammatory markers indicating treatment intensification and appropriate measures in case of colchicine intolerance or non-adherence. The analysis of data derived from the national AID-NET showed that colchicine therapy was successfully terminated in 61% of patients (27 out of 44) with heterozygous MEFV mutations. Multidimensional treatment targets incorporating objective and subjective reported outcome measures were developed. These provide the basis for stratifying patients into the following treatment paths: continue colchicine, persisting attacks / inflammation, colchicine intolerance, persisting arthritis, colchicine reduction and adjustment/reduction of biologics.ConclusionsThe proposed consensus treatment plan for the management of FMF incorporates multidimensional targets allowing transparent treatment decisions, which will promote personalised disease management and increase adherence to therapy.

For Elective Aortic Surgery Patients, Preoperative Surgeon-to-surgeon Collaborative Case Conferences Resulted in a High Rate of Change From Initial to Consensus Treatment Plan

For Elective Aortic Surgery Patients, Preoperative Surgeon-to-surgeon Collaborative Case Conferences Resulted in a High Rate of Change From Initial to Consensus Treatment Plan

Feasibility of Conducting Comparative Effectiveness Research and Validation of a Clinical Disease Activity Score for Chronic Nonbacterial Osteomyelitis.

Prospective comparative effectiveness research (CER) in chronic nonbacterial osteomyelitis (CNO) is lacking. Our objectives were to (1) determine the use and safety of each consensus treatment plan (CTP) regimen for CNO, (2) assess the feasibility of using the Chronic Nonbacterial Osteomyelitis International Registry (CHOIR) data for CER, and (3) develop and validate a CNO clinical disease activity score (CDAS) using CHOIR. Consenting children or young adults with CNO were enrolled into CHOIR. Demographic, clinical, and imaging data were prospectively collected. The CNO CDAS was developed through a Delphi survey and nominal group technique. External validation surveys were administered to CHOIR participants. One hundred forty (78.2%) CHOIR participants enrolled between August 2018 and September 2020 received at least 1 CTP regimen. Baseline characteristics from different CTP groups were well matched. Patient pain, patient global assessment, and clinical CNO lesion count were key variables included in the CNO CDAS. The CDAS showed a strong correlation with patient/parent report of difficulty using a limb, back, or jaw and patient/parent report of disease severity, but a weak correlation with patient/parent report of fatigue, sadness, and worry. The change in CDAS was significant in patients reporting disease worsening or improvement (P < 0.001). The CDAS significantly decreased after initiating second-line treatments from median 12.0 (IQR 8.0-15.5) to 5.0 (IQR 3.0-12.0; P = 0.002). Although second-line treatments were well tolerated, psoriasis was the most common adverse event. The CNO CDAS was developed and validated for disease monitoring and assessment of treatment effectiveness. CHOIR provided a comprehensive framework for future CER.

Diagnosis and Treatment of Chronic Non-bacterial Osteomyelitis: A Survey on Current Practices Adopted by Pediatric Rheumatologists in Saudi Arabia.

Chronic nonbacterial osteomyelitis (CNO) is an autoinflammatory bone disease usually managed by pediatric rheumatologists (PRs). There is a need for a consensus treatment plan to minimize the diversity in clinical practice in the diagnosis and management of CNO. In this study, we explored the practice of PRs in Saudi Arabia on the diagnosis and treatment of patients with CNO. This is a cross-sectional study that was conducted among PRs in Saudi Arabia (May to September 2020). A survey was performed among PRs registered in the Saudi Commission for Health Specialties using an electronic-based questionnaire. The survey consisted of 35 closed-ended questions about the diagnosis and management of CNO patients. We explored the approaches adopted by PRs in diagnosing and monitoring the disease activity, their awareness of clinical possibilities that necessitate ordering bone biopsy, and the treatment choices they considered for CNO patients. We scrutinized data from a total of 77% (n=41/53) PRs who responded to our survey. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was reported as the most frequently used modality in suspected CNO (82%, n=27/33), followed by plain X-ray (61%) and bone scintigraphy (58%). Magnetic resonance imaging of a symptomatic site is the imaging modality of choice for the diagnosis of CNO (82%), Followed by X-ray (61%) and bone scintigraphy (58%). The reasons for performing bone biopsy were unifocal lesions (82%), unusual sites of presentation (79%), and multifocal lesions (30%). The preferred treatment regimens were bisphosphonates (53%), non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs alone (43%), or biologics with bisphosphonates (28%). The reasons to upgrade the treatment in CNO included the development of vertebral lesions (91%), the development of new lesions in MRI (73%), and the elevation of inflammatory markers (55%). The disease activity was assessed by history and physical examination (91%), inflammatory markers (84%), MRI of targeted symptomatic site (66%), and a whole-body MRI (41%). The approach todiagnosis and treatment of CNO varies among PRs in Saudi Arabia. Our findings provide a background for the development of a consensus treatment plan for challenging CNO patients.

Treatment escalation patterns to start biologics in refractory moderate juvenile dermatomyositis among members of the Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance

BackgroundDespite new and better treatments for juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM), not all patients with moderate severity disease respond adequately to first-line therapy. Those with refractory disease remain at higher risk for disease and glucocorticoid-related complications. Biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) have become part of the arsenal of treatments for JDM. However, prospective comparative studies of commonly used biologics are lacking.MethodsThe Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance (CARRA) JDM biologics workgroup met in 2019 and produced a survey assessing current treatment escalation practices for JDM, including preferences regarding use of biologic treatments. The cases and questions were developed using a consensus framework, requiring 80% agreement for consensus. The survey was completed online in 2020 by CARRA members interested in JDM. Survey results were analyzed among all respondents and according to years of experience. Chi-square or Fisher’s exact test was used to compare the distribution of responses to each survey question.ResultsOne hundred twenty-one CARRA members responded to the survey (denominators vary for each question). Of the respondents, 88% were pediatric rheumatologists, 85% practiced in the United States, and 43% had over 10 years of experience. For a patient with moderately severe JDM refractory to methotrexate, glucocorticoids, and IVIG, approximately 80% of respondents indicated that they would initiate a biologic after failing 1–2 non-biologic DMARDs. Trials of methotrexate and mycophenolate were considered necessary by 96% and 60% of respondents, respectively, before initiating a biologic. By weighed average, rituximab was the preferred biologic over abatacept, tocilizumab, and infliximab. Over 50% of respondents would start a biologic by 4 months from diagnosis for patients with refractory moderately severe JDM. There were no notable differences in treatment practices between respondents by years of experience.ConclusionMost respondents favored starting a biologic earlier in disease course after trialing up to two conventional DMARDs, specifically including methotrexate. There was a clear preference for rituximab. However, there remains a dearth of prospective data comparing biologics in refractory JDM. These findings underscore the need for biologic consensus treatment plans (CTPs) for refractory JDM, which will ultimately facilitate comparative effectiveness studies and inform treatment practices.

First-line options for systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis treatment: an observational study of Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance Consensus Treatment Plans

The Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance (CARRA) developed consensus treatment plans (CTPs) to compare treatment initiation strategies for systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA). First-line options for sJIA treatment (FROST) was a prospective observational study to assess CTP outcomes using the CARRA Registry. Patients with new-onset sJIA were enrolled if they received initial treatment according to the biologic CTPs (IL-1 or IL-6 inhibitor) or non-biologic CTPs (glucocorticoid (GC) monotherapy or methotrexate). CTPs could be used with or without systemic GC. Primary outcome was achievement of clinical inactive disease (CID) at 9 months without current use of GC. Due to the small numbers of patients in the non-biologic CTPs, no statistical comparisons were made between the CTPs. Seventy-three patients were enrolled: 63 (86%) in the biologic CTPs and 10 (14%) in the non-biologic CTPs. CTP choice appeared to be strongly influenced by physician preference. During the first month of follow-up, oral GC use was observed in 54% of biologic CTP patients and 90% of non-biologic CTPs patients. Five (50%) non-biologic CTP patients subsequently received biologics within 4 months of follow-up. Overall, 30/53 (57%) of patients achieved CID at 9 months without current GC use. Nearly all patients received treatment with biologics during the study period, and 46% of biologic CTP patients did not receive oral GC within the first month of treatment. The majority of patients had favorable short-term clinical outcomes. Increased use of biologics and decreased use of GC may lead to improved outcomes in sJIA.

Consensus Treatment Plans for Severe Pediatric Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-Associated Vasculitis.

There is no standardized approach to the treatment of pediatric antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis (AAV). Because of the rarity of pediatric AAV, randomized trials have not been feasible. The present study of the Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance (CARRA) was undertaken to establish consensus treatment plans (CTPs) for severe pediatric AAV to enable the future study of comparative effectiveness and safety. A workgroup of CARRA members (rheumatologists and nephrologists) formed the AAV Workgroup. This group performed a literature review on existing evidence-based treatments and guidelines for the management of AAV. They determined that the target population for CTP development was patients <18 years of age with new-onset granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA), microscopic polyangiitis, or renal-limited AAV (eosinophilic GPA was excluded), with presentation confined to those with severe disease (i.e., organ- or life-threatening). Face-to-face consensus conferences employed nominal group techniques to identify treatment strategies for remission induction and remission maintenance, data elements to be systematically collected, and outcomes to be measured over time. The pediatric AAV Workgroup developed 2 CTPs for each of the remission induction and remission maintenance of severe AAV. A glucocorticoid-weaning regimen for induction and maintenance, a core data set, and outcome measures were also defined. A random sample of CARRA membership voted acceptance of the CTPs for remission induction and remission maintenance, with a 94% (75 of 80) and 98% (78 of 80) approval rate, respectively. Consensus methodology established standardized CTPs for treating severe pediatric AAV. These CTPs were in principle accepted by CARRA-wide membership for the evaluation of pragmatic comparative effectiveness in a long-term registry.

A Girl with Limp and Rash on the Palms and Soles.

A Girl with Limp and Rash on the Palms and Soles.

Differences in rituximab use between pediatric rheumatologists and nephrologists for the treatment of refractory lupus nephritis and renal flare in childhood-onset SLE

BackgroundConsensus treatment plans have been developed for induction therapy of newly diagnosed proliferative lupus nephritis (LN) in childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus. However, patients who do not respond to initial therapy, or who develop renal flare after remission, warrant escalation of treatment. Our objective was to assess current practices of pediatric nephrologists and rheumatologists in North America in treatment of refractory proliferative LN and flare.MethodsMembers of Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance (CARRA) and the American Society for Pediatric Nephrology (ASPN) were surveyed in November 2015 to assess therapy choices (other than modifying steroid dosing) and level of agreement between rheumatologists and nephrologists for proliferative LN patients. Two cases were presented: (1) refractory disease after induction treatment with corticosteroid and cyclophosphamide (CYC) and (2) nephritis flare after initial response to treatment. Survey respondents chose treatments for three follow up scenarios for each case that varied by severity of presentation. Treatment options included CYC, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), rituximab (RTX), and others, alone or in combination.ResultsSeventy-six respondents from ASPN and foty-one respondents from CARRA represented approximately 15 % of the eligible members from each organization. Treatment choices between nephrologists and rheumatologists were highly variable and received greater than 50 % agreement for an individual treatment choice in only the following 2 of 6 follow up scenarios: 59 % of nephrologists, but only 38 % of rheumatologists, chose increasing dose of MMF in the case of LN refractory to induction therapy with proteinuria, hematuria, and improved serum creatinine. In a follow up scenario showing severe renal flare after achieving remission with induction therapy, 58 % of rheumatologists chose CYC and RTX combination therapy, whereas the top choice for nephrologists (43 %) was CYC alone. Rheumatologists in comparison to nephrologists chose more therapy options that contained RTX in all follow up scenarios except one (p < 0.05).ConclusionsTherapy choices for pediatric rheumatologists and nephrologists in the treatment of refractory LN or LN flare were highly variable with rheumatologists more often choosing rituximab. Further investigation is necessary to delineate the reasons behind this finding. This study highlights the importance of collaborative efforts in developing consensus treatment plans for pediatric LN.

An Ensemble Learning Framework for Model Fitting and Evaluation in Inverse Linear Optimization

We develop a generalized inverse optimization framework for fitting the cost vector of a single linear optimization problem given multiple observed decisions. This setting is motivated by ensemble learning, where building consensus from base learners can yield better predictions. We unify several models in the inverse optimization literature under a single framework and derive assumption-free and exact solution methods for each one. We extend a goodness-of-fit metric previously introduced for the problem with a single observed decision to this new setting and demonstrate several important properties. Finally, we demonstrate our framework in a novel inverse optimization-driven procedure for automated radiation therapy treatment planning. Here, the inverse optimization model leverages an ensemble of dose predictions from different machine learning models to construct a consensus treatment plan that outperforms baseline methods. The consensus plan yields better trade-offs between the competing clinical criteria used for plan evaluation.

Characteristics, Treatment Options, and Outcomes of Chronic Non-bacterial Osteomyelitis in Children

Chronic non-bacterial osteomyelitis (CNO) is an autoinflammatory bone disease most prevalent in children. In this review, we seek to highlight the most recent advances in the understanding of the pathophysiology, treatment, and outcomes of CNO. Recent observations support a pathophysiologic framework involving imbalanced expression of pro-inflammatory versus anti-inflammatory cytokines, thereby inducing increased differentiation and activation of osteoclasts. Although no medication nor protocol is yet specifically indicated in the treatment of CNO, there exists an expanding body of evidence for agents exerting their effects via interference with these pro-inflammatory pathways (namely non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs, bisphosphonates, and biologics), highlighted herein. With an incidence rivaling that of bacterial osteomyelitis, childhood CNO represents an important and growing field of study. Once thought to be benign and self-limiting, CNO is now recognized to follow a relapsing and remitting course in the majority of children, and to carry substantial risk of irreversible growth and bone sequelae. Perhaps of greatest importance to the study of CNO treatment is the recent development of the Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance (CARRA) consensus treatment plans, the implementation of which will allow for prospective comparative effectiveness studies and, ultimately, the development of standardized treatment protocols.

Consensus treatment plans for periodic fever, aphthous stomatitis, pharyngitis and adenitis syndrome (PFAPA): a framework to evaluate treatment responses from the childhood arthritis and rheumatology research alliance (CARRA) PFAPA work group

BackgroundPeriodic fever, aphthous stomatitis, pharyngitis, and cervical adenitis (PFAPA) syndrome is the most common periodic fever syndrome in children. There is considerable heterogeneity in management strategies and a lack of evidence-based treatment guidelines. Consensus treatment plans (CTPs) are standardized treatment regimens that are derived based upon best available evidence and current treatment practices that are a way to enable comparative effectiveness studies to identify optimal therapy and are less costly to execute than randomized, double blind placebo controlled trials. The purpose of this project was to develop CTPs and response criteria for PFAPA.MethodsThe CARRA PFAPA Working Group is composed of pediatric rheumatologists, infectious disease specialists, allergists/immunologists and otolaryngologists. An extensive literature review was conducted followed by a survey to assess physician practice patterns. This was followed by virtual and in-person meetings between 2014 and 2018. Nominal group technique (NGT) was employed to develop CTPs, as well as inclusion criteria for entry into future treatment studies, and response criteria. Consensus required 80% agreement.ResultsThe PFAPA working group developed CTPs resulting in 4 different treatment arms: 1. Antipyretic, 2. Abortive (corticosteroids), 3. Prophylaxis (colchicine or cimetidine) and 4. Surgical (tonsillectomy). Consensus was obtained among CARRA members for those defining patient characteristics who qualify for participation in the CTP PFAPA study.ConclusionThe goal is for the CTPs developed by our group to lead to future comparative effectiveness studies that will generate evidence-driven therapeutic guidelines for this periodic inflammatory disease.

Pilot Study of the Juvenile Dermatomyositis Consensus Treatment Plans: A CARRA Registry Study.

To determine the feasibility of comparing the Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology ResearchAlliance (CARRA) consensus treatment plans (CTP) in treating moderate new-onset juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM) using the CARRA registry, and to establish appropriate analytic methods to control for confounding by indication and missing data. A pilot cohort of 39 patients with JDM from the CARRA registry was studied. Patients were assigned by the treating physician, considering patient/family preferences, to 1 of 3 CTP: methotrexate (MTX) and prednisone (MP); intravenous (IV) methylprednisolone, MTX, and prednisone (MMP); or IV methylprednisolone, MTX, prednisone, and IV immunoglobulin (MMPI). The primary outcome was the proportion of patients achieving moderate improvement at 6 months under each CTP. Statistical methods including multiple imputation and inverse probability of treatment weighting were used to handle missing data and confounding by indication. Patients received MP (n = 13), MMP (n = 18) and MMPI (n = 8). Patients in all CTP had significant improvement in disease activity. Of the 36 patients who remained in our pilot study at 6 months, 16 (44%) of them successfully achieved moderate improvement at 6 months (6/13, 46% for MP; 7/15, 47% for MMP; 3/8, 38% for MMPI). After correcting for confounding, there were no statistically significant pairwise differences between the CTP (P = 0.328-0.88). We gained valuable experience and insight from our pilot study that can be used to guide the design and analysis of comparative effectiveness studies using the CARRA registry CTP approach. Our analytical methods can be adopted for future comparative effectiveness studies and applied to other rare disease observational studies.

Consensus protocols for the diagnosis and management of the hereditary autoinflammatory syndromes CAPS, TRAPS and MKD/HIDS: a German PRO-KIND initiative

BackgroundRare autoinflammatory diseases (AIDs) including Cryopyrin-Associated Periodic Syndrome (CAPS), Tumor Necrosis Receptor-Associated Periodic Syndrome (TRAPS) and Mevalonate Kinase Deficiency Syndrome (MKD)/ Hyper-IgD Syndrome (HIDS) are genetically defined and characterized by recurrent fever episodes and inflammatory organ manifestations. Early diagnosis and early start of effective therapies control the inflammation and prevent organ damage. The PRO-KIND initiative of the German Society of Pediatric Rheumatology (GKJR) aims to harmonize the diagnosis and management of children with rheumatic diseases nationally. The task of the PRO-KIND CAPS/TRAPS/MKD/HIDS working group was to develop evidence-based, consensus diagnosis and management protocols including the first AID treat-to-target strategies.MethodsThe national CAPS/TRAPS/MKD/HIDS expert working group was established, defined its aims and conducted a comprehensive literature review synthesising the recent (2013 to 2018) published evidence including all available recommendations for diagnosis and management. General and disease-specific statements were anchored in the 2015 SHARE recommendations. An iterative expert review process discussed, adapted and refined these statements. Ultimately the GKJR membership vetted the proposed consensus statements, agreement of 80% was mandatory for inclusion. The approved statements were integrated into three disease specific consensus treatment plans (CTPs). These were developed to enable the implementation of evidence-based, standardized care into clinical practice.ResultsThe CAPS/TRAPS/MKD/HIDS expert working group of 12 German and Austrian paediatric rheumatologists completed the evidence synthesis and modified a total of 38 statements based on the SHARE recommendation framework. In iterative reviews 36 reached the mandatory agreement threshold of 80% in the final GKJR member survey. These included 9 overarching principles and 27 disease-specific statements (7 for CAPS, 11 TRAPS, 9 MKD/HIDS). A diagnostic algorithm was established based on the synthesized evidence. Statements were integrated into diagnosis- and disease activity specific treat-to-target CTPs for CAPS, TRAPS and MKD/HIDS.ConclusionsThe PRO-KIND CAPS/TRAPS/MKD/HIDS working group established the first evidence-based, actionable treat-to-target consensus treatment plans for three rare hereditary autoinflammatory diseases. These provide a path to a rapid evaluation, effective control of disease activity and tailored adjustment of therapies. Their implementation will decrease variation in care and optimize health outcomes for children with AID.

A retrospective study: Impact of consensus treatment plans on systemic therapy of pediatric morphea.

Morphea is an inflammatory and fibrosing condition that affects the skin and subcutaneous structures. Morphea is managed by dermatologists, rheumatologists, or both. Prior studies have suggested there is significant variability in approach to treatment. In 2012, the Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance (CARRA) published consensus treatment plans (CTPs) for pediatric morphea to develop more standardized treatment plans for patients requiring systemic therapy. We aimed to assess whether the publication of CTPs has impacted care of patients with morphea at our institution. Data were collected via a retrospective review of medical records of 61 pediatric patients diagnosed with morphea at Seattle Children's Hospital (SCH) from January 1, 2005, to December 12,2017. Prior to the publication of CTPs, 2 out of 24 patients (8.3%) were treated with a regimen that matched a subsequent CTP. After publication of CTPs, 29 out of 37 patients (78.4%) were treated with a regimen that matched a CTP (P<0.001). A subanalysis was performed to assess the number of patients who needed second- or third-line therapies. Of those who followed a CTP therapy plan (n=26), 3 patients (11.5%) needed a second-line therapy compared with 11 patients (44%) in the no-CTP followed group (n=25), (P=0.012). The publication of CTPs led to a significant change in treatment approach for patients with morphea requiring systemic therapy at SCH. Patients treated with one of the treatment plans recommended by the CTPs were less likely to need second-line systemic therapy.

Approach to Classification and Management of Childhood-Onset Lupus Nephritis

(1) To discuss the relevance of the 2018 International Society of Nephrology/Renal Pathology Society (ISN/RPS) classification system for nephritis in childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). (2) To highlight current practices not addressed in the 2013 Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance (CARRA) consensus treatment plan (CTP) for pediatric lupus nephritis (LN). In addition to class of glomerular involvement, multiple features on kidney biopsy can be assessed for prognosis and therapeutic decision-making. There is pediatric evidence and expertise for optimization of LN classification. Yet, treatment is based primarily on whether nephritis is proliferative or membranous. Moreover, alternative strategies for induction therapy are more commonly prescribed for children. There is a need for pediatric data to evaluate/validate LN classification systems. Updates are needed to CTPs for LN induction therapy. Pediatric nephrologists should be enrolling LN patients into existing prospective registries to build the evidence base for treatment decisions.