Abstract Disclosure: J. Andreano: None. A. Lopez: None. M. Misra: None. Background: Previous research indicates that acute gonadal treatments and fluctuations in ovarian hormone levels over the course of the menstrual cycle can alter patterns of communication between brain regions, as well as producing significant changes in self-reported affect. Recent research from our laboratory indicates changes in both brain connectivity and affect with gender affirming hormone therapy (GAHT). However, the relationship between these changes with GAHT are not well understood. Additionally, it is difficult to separate influences of GAHT and transgender identity in understanding differences in connectvity and affect from cisgender controls. A better understanding of the influence of GAHT on intrinsic network connectivity could point the way towards improved GAHT treatment regimens that minimize affective side effects. Objective: To assess relationships between changes in brain network connectivity and affective changes following GAHT, identifying regions in which changes of connectivity are associated with changes in self-reported affect, and to examine differences in brain network connectivity between transgender participants and cisgender controls. Methods: 14 transgender individuals receiving GAHT (estradiol n =7, testosterone n = 7)) were scanned using functional magnetic imaging (fMRI) at rest at two timepoints: baseline, prior to treatment, and 6 months into GAHT. Additionally, 20 cisgender controls (10 male, 10 female) were scanned once each. The time course of neural activity was computed for each voxel in the brain, then tested for correlation with each other voxel to develop a whole-brain connectome for each participant. Maps of average connectivity to two seeds known to associate with two major networks in the brain (posterior cingulate cortex for Default Mode Network, and anterior insula for Salience Network) were then generated for each participant. Within transgender participants, these maps were then compared between the baseline and 6 month timepoints. Additionally, baseline scans were also compared to scans from cisgender controls corresponding to biological sex. Results: Within-subjects analyses of transgender participants showed diverse associations between changes in seed-based connectivity and changes in self-reported anxiety and depression following GAHT in both the default mode and salience networks. Between subjects comparisons showed significantly higher connectivity within the salience network in trans men relative to cis women, as well as greater inter-network connectivity in this group. In contrast, cis men showed greater connectivity within both default mode and salience networks relative to trans women. Conclusions: Changes in affect following GAHT appear related to GAHT-induced changes in network connectivity; these influences appear independent of differences between cis and transgender individuals. Presentation: 6/2/2024