Congress Of Neurological Surgeons Research Articles

Cervical collar use in spinal cord injury management

AbstractBackgroundThe use of cervical collars in the management of acute cervical spine injuries has been part of standard practice in the trauma setting for decades, aimed at preventing secondary injuries.ObjectivesTo review the recent evidence challenging the routine use of cervical collars, addressing the limited scientific support, associated risks, and guidelines for their use.MethodsA comprehensive literature review was conducted, analyzing recent studies and guidelines from authoritative bodies such as the American Association for Neurological Surgeons and the Congress of Neurological Surgeons. The review focused on the efficacy, risks, and recommendations regarding cervical collar use in acute cervical spine injuries.ResultsRecent evidence questions the routine use of cervical collars, highlighting limited scientific support and several associated risks, including pressure ulcers and decreased venous return. Cervical collars may also be contraindicated in individuals with abnormal spinal structures, such as those with Ankylosing Spondylitis. The efficacy of cervical collars is debated, particularly concerning undiagnosed spinal fractures, where delayed diagnosis can result in permanent injuries. Despite these risks, cervical collars may be beneficial in low‐resource areas and when used effectively with early clearance post‐injury. Current guidelines recommend immobilizing patients suspected of cervical spine injury but stress the importance of proper evaluation of the need for immobilization. Recent guidelines advocate for spinal motion restriction over traditional immobilization, emphasizing the need for better risk assessment and implementation strategies.Conclusions/Clinical ImportanceRe‐evaluating the routine use of cervical collars is crucial due to potential risks and limited supporting evidence, with a focus on individualized assessment and adherence to updated guidelines favoring spinal motion restriction.

Publication patterns of posters and oral presentations at the Annual Meeting of the Joint AANS/CNS Cerebrovascular Section.

The American Association of Neurological Surgeons (AANS) and Congress of Neurological Surgeons (CNS) Joint Cerebrovascular (CV) Section serves as a centralized entity for the dissemination of information related to CV neurosurgery. The quality of scientific conferences, such as the CV Section's Society of NeuroInterventional Surgery Annual Meeting, can be gauged by the number of poster and oral presentations that are published in peer-reviewed journals. However, publication rates from the CV Section's meetings are unknown. The objective of this study was to assess the rate at which abstracts presented at the AANS/CNS CV Section Annual Meeting from 2014 to 2018 were subsequently published in peer-reviewed journals. The abstract titles for all accepted poster and oral podium presentation abstracts from the 2014-2018 Annual Joint AANS/CNS CV Section Meetings were searched using PubMed. A match was defined as sufficient similarity between the abstract and its corresponding journal publication with regard to title, authors, methods, and results. Five-year impact factors (IFs) from Journal Citation Reports (JCR), the country of the corresponding author, and the number of citations in the Scopus database were obtained using the articles' digital object identifier when available, or the exact article title, journal, and year of publication. Of the 607 total poster and oral presentations from the 2014-2018 Annual Meetings of the AANS/CNS Joint CV Section, 46.29% (n = 281) have been published. Published articles received 3233 total citations for an average number of citations per article (± SD) of 10.89 ± 16.37. The average 5-year JCR IF of published studies was 4.64 ± 3.13. Additionally, 98.22% of published abstracts were in publication within 4 years from the time the abstract was presented. The most common peer-reviewed neurosurgical journals featuring these publications were the Journal of Neurosurgery, World Neurosurgery, the Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery, Neurosurgery, and the Journal of Clinical Neuroscience. Nearly half of all poster and oral presentations at the annual meetings of the AANS/CNS Joint CV Section from 2014 to 2018 have been published in PubMed-indexed, peer-reviewed journals. The average number of citations per publication (10.89 ± 16.37) reflects the high quality of abstracts accepted for presentation. It is important to continuously assess the quality of research presented at national conferences to ensure that standards are being maintained for the advancement of clinical practice in a given area of medicine. Conference abstract publication rates in peer-reviewed journals represent a way in which research quality can be gauged, and the authors encourage others to conduct similar investigations in their subspecialty area of interest and/or practice.

Low surgical weight associated with ETV failure in pediatric hydrocephalus patients.

The use of endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) for treatment of pediatric hydrocephalus has higher failure rates in younger patients. Here we investigate the impact of select perioperative variables, specifically gestational age, chronological age, birth weight, and surgical weight, on ETV failure rates. A retrospective review was performed on patients treated with ETV - with or without choroid plexus cauterization (CPC) - from 2010 to 2021 at a large academic center. Analyses included Cox regression for independent predictors and Kaplan-Meier survival curves for time to-event outcomes. In total, 47 patients were treated with ETV; of these, 31 received adjunctive CPC. Overall, 66% of the cohort experienced ETV failure with a median failure of 36 days postoperatively. Patients aged < 6 months at time of surgery experienced 80% failure rate, and those > 6 months at time of surgery experienced a 41% failure rate. Univariate Cox regression analysis showed weight at the time of ETV surgery was significantly inversely associated with ETV failure with a hazard ratio of 0.92 (95% CI 0.82, 0.99). Multivariate analysis redemonstrated the inverse association of weight at time of surgery with ETV failure with hazard ratio of 0.76 (95% CI 0.60, 0.92), and sensitivity analysis showed < 4.9kg as the optimal cutoff predicting ETV/CPC failure. Neither chronologic age nor gestational age were found to be significantly associated with ETV failure.In this study, younger patients experienced higher ETV failure rates, but multivariate regression found that weight was a more robust predictor of ETV failure than chronologic age or gestational age, with an optimal cutoff of 4.9kg in our small cohort. Given the limited sample size, further study is needed to elucidate the independent role of weight as a peri-operative variable in determining ETV candidacy in young infants. Previous presentations: Poster Presentation, Congress of Neurological Surgeons.

A Critical Appraisal of the Congress of Neurological Surgeons Evidence-Based Guidelines on the Evaluation and Treatment of Patients With Thoracolumbar Spine Trauma.

Background and objective Thoracolumbar spine trauma (TST) is frequently associated with spinal cord injury and other soft tissue and bony injuries.The management of such injuries requires an evidence-based approach. This study used the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II instrument to assess the methodological quality of clinical guidelines for the management of TST published by the Congress of Neurological Surgeons (CNS). Methods All clinical guidelines on TST published by CNS until 2020 were assessed. Five appraisers from three international centers evaluated the quality of eligible clinical guidelines by using AGREE II. Mean AGREE II scores for each domain were determined. In higher-quality domains, the scores for individual items were analyzed. Results A total of 12 guidelines published by CNSon TST were assessed. Mean scores for all six domains were as follows: Scope and Purpose (75.2%), Stakeholder Involvement (45.4%), Rigor of Development (57.0%), Clarity of Presentation (58.7%), Applicability (16.9%), and Editorial Independence (64.1%). The mean score for the overall quality of all CNS guidelines was 52.9% [95% confidence interval (CI): 52.2-53.5%]. The overall agreement among appraisers was excellent [intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) for each guideline ranged from 0.903 to 0.963]. Conclusions CNS guidelines for the management of TST demonstrated acceptable quality across most domains; however, the domains of Applicability and Stakeholder Involvement could befurther improved in future guideline updates. The assessors concluded that all guidelines could still be recommended for clinical practice with or without modifications.

Educational Limitations of ChatGPT in Neurosurgery Board Preparation.

Objective This study evaluated the potential of Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer (ChatGPT) as an educational tool for neurosurgery residents preparing for the American Board of Neurological Surgery (ABNS) primary examination. Methods Non-imaging questions from the Congress of Neurological Surgeons (CNS) Self-Assessment in Neurological Surgery(SANS) online question bank were input into ChatGPT. Accuracy was evaluated and compared to human performance across subcategories. To quantify ChatGPT's educational potential, the concordance and insight of explanations were assessed by multiple neurosurgical faculty. Associations among these metrics as well as question length were evaluated. Results ChatGPT had an accuracy of 50.4% (1,068/2,120), with the highest and lowest accuracies in the pharmacology (81.2%, 13/16) and vascular (32.9%, 91/277) subcategories, respectively. ChatGPT performed worse than humans overall, as well as in the functional, other, peripheral, radiology, spine, trauma, tumor, and vascular subcategories. There were no subjects in which ChatGPT performed better than humans and its accuracy was below that required to pass the exam. The mean concordance was 93.4% (198/212) and the mean insight score was 2.7. Accuracy was negatively associated with question length (R2=0.29, p=0.03) but positively associated with both concordance (p<0.001, q<0.001) and insight (p<0.001, q<0.001). Conclusions The current study provides the largest and most comprehensive assessment of the accuracy and explanatory quality of ChatGPT in answering ABNS primary exam questions. The findings demonstrate shortcomings regarding ChatGPT's ability to pass, let alone teach, the neurosurgical boards.

Cross-sectional examination of current and future trends and attributes of the presidents of the American Association of Neurological Surgeons and the Congress of Neurological Surgeons societies

ObjectiveThe present study aimed to analyze the academic attributes of the presidents of the American Association of Neurological Surgeons (AANS) and the Congress of Neurological Surgeons (CNS) over the past four decades to elucidate the trajectories of these societies' leaderships. MethodsForty-three AANS and 43 CNS presidents of the past four decades were identified. Demographic and research productivity data were collected from publicly available sources. ResultsCompared to AANS presidents, CNS presidents were younger (median = 48 years vs. 59.5 years; p < 0.001), had fewer years of practice prior to their election (15 years vs. 28 years; p < 0.001), had higher NIH funding rate (37.2% vs. 11.6%; p = 0.01), and higher rate of practicing at academic institutions (93% vs. 74.4%; p = 0.04). The CNS presidents had a comparable median number of publications at election (AANS: 72 vs. CNS: 94 publications, p = 0.78) but a higher median h-index scores (AANS: 28 vs. CNS: 59; p = 0.04). In the multiple linear regression analysis, vascular subspecialty (β = 0.21 [95% CI: 0.09–0.34]; p = 0.002) and practicing in a non-academic institution (β = 0.23 [95% CI: 0.08–0.39]; p = 0.007) were predictors for later election for AANS presidency. ConclusionsWe characterized the attributes of AANS and CNS presidents to serve as useful references for career trajectories for junior neurosurgeons and trainees. Research and academic presence seem to be associated with early election to both societies.

Survey of United States neurosurgeons on firearm injury prevention.

Firearm-related injuries and deaths are an endemic problem in the US, posing a burden on the healthcare system with significant social and economic consequences. As front-line care providers for these patients, neurosurgeons are both knowledgeable about these injuries and credible messengers in the public discussion of ways to reduce firearm injuries. The purpose of this study was to explore US-based neurosurgeons' views and behaviors regarding firearms to understand and define a potential role for neurosurgical organizations in advocacy efforts to reduce firearm death and injuries. The authors conducted an anonymous survey of US neurosurgeons using the American Association of Neurological Surgeons (AANS) member database from April to June 2023. The 22-question survey included questions related to firearm ownership, personal views on firearms, and support for both general and policy-specific advocacy efforts to reduce firearm deaths and injuries. The survey response rate was 20.7%, with 1568 of the 7587 members invited completing the survey. The survey completion rate was 93.4%, with 1465 of the 1568 surveys completed and included in this analysis. The majority of respondents were male (raw: 81.7%; weighted 81.1%), White (raw: 69.7%; weighted 70.2%), and older than 50 years (raw: 56.2%; weighted: 54%). Most respondents reported treating patients with firearm injuries (raw: 83.3%; weighted: 82%), 85.5% (weighted: 85.1%) had used a firearm, and 42.4% (weighted: 41.5%) reported owning a firearm. Overall, 78.8% (weighted: 78.7%) of respondents felt that organized neurosurgery should participate in advocacy efforts. When examining individual policies, those that restrict the acquisition of firearms garnered the support of at least 65% of respondents, while nonrestrictive policies were supported by more than 75% of respondents. Free-text responses provided insight into both motivations for and objections to organizational advocacy. The majority of US-based neurosurgeons support involvement in advocacy efforts to reduce firearm deaths and injuries. Themes expressed by members both supporting and objecting to advocacy provide insight into approaches that could ensure broad support. Neurosurgical organizations such as the AANS and Congress of Neurological Surgeons may use the results of this survey to make informed decisions regarding involvement in advocacy efforts on behalf of their membership to lessen the burden of firearm injury in the US.

Endoscopic Transorbital Surgery for Trigeminal Schwannoma: Introduction of a Novel Approach: 2-Dimensional Operative Video.

The major indications of endoscopic transorbital approach include spheno-orbital meningiomas, cavernous sinus lesions, and Meckel cave lesion such as trigeminal schwannomas. It can avoid excessive brain retraction and allows for a fast recovery to the normal daily living activity. To access the cavernous sinus, the sagittal crest and meningo-orbital band should be identified and cut. 1. Skin incision along the superior eyelid is performed. 2. Careful dissection of the soft tissue under the orbicularis is required not to injure the orbital septum. 3. After the lateral orbital rim is exposed, the periosteum and periorbita are elevated from the lateral orbital wall. 4. Drilling of the zygomatic bone within the orbit exposes the temporalis muscle first followed by the exposure of the temporal dura. It is essential to obtain adequate working room when the base of the greater sphenoidal wing is drilled. The sagittal crest should be removed, and the meningo-orbital band should be cut to expose the lateral cavernous sinus wall. For successful access through the orbit, endoscopic transorbital approach needs to minimize the retraction of the orbit. To achieve this goal, retraction of the orbit should be limited to a maximum of 10 minutes. This approach can be combined with lateral orbitotomy. It provides a wider working room and makes surgery easier to access the lateral temporal lobe.The patient consented to the procedure, and the participants and any identifiable individuals consented to publication of his/her image. Images at 1:29 reproduced from Corrivetti F, de Notaris M, Di Somma A, et al, "Sagittal crest": definition, stepwise dissection, and clinical implications from a transorbital perspective, Operative Neurosurgery, 22(5), p e206-e212, ©2022, by permission from the Congress of Neurological Surgeons. Video screen capture from The Neurosurgical Atlas at 1:06 used with permission from Aaron Cohen-Gadol; ©The Neurosurgical Atlas, all rights reserved.

Academic career progression in AANS/CNS Spine Section award recipients.

The American Association of Neurological Surgeons (AANS)/Congress of Neurological Surgeons (CNS) Joint Spine Section awards highlight outstanding abstracts submitted to the AANS/CNS Section on Disorders of the Spine and Peripheral Nerves by trainees interested in spine surgery, although the academic trajectory of awardees has not been studied. The aim of this study was to assess the academic career progression of prior recipients of the Journalistic and Academic Neurosurgical Excellence (JANE), Mayfield, and Kuntz research awards. Prior JANE, Mayfield, and Kuntz award recipients were identified using awardee records accrued between 1984 and February 2022. Awardee sex, country of residence, specialty, subspecialty focus, and current academic appointment status (if applicable) were searched online. Awardee h-indices and number of peer-reviewed publications were assessed via Google Scholar profiles (or Scopus if unavailable) and PubMed, respectively. Receipt of federal research funding as principal investigator (PI) was determined using the websites of the National Institutes of Health, the National Science Foundation, and the Department of Defense Congressionally Directed Medical Research Programs. The abstract-to-publication rate was assessed. A total of 7 JANE awards, 57 Mayfield awards, and 149 Kuntz awards were identified. Of the JANE awardees, all recipients were male. Of the 4 unique JANE awardees who completed training, 2 (50.0%) held academic appointments at the time of the study. All of the JANE abstracts were published in peer-reviewed journals. The mean h-index of all JANE awardees was 28 and the mean number of publications was 126. None of the awardees have received federal research funding. Of the Mayfield awards, 98.2% were awarded to males. Of the 43 unique Mayfield awardees who completed training, 20 (46.5%) held faculty appointments at academic medical centers. All of the Mayfield abstracts since 2011 were published in peer-reviewed journals. The mean h-index of all Mayfield awardees was 26 and the mean number of publications was 82. Five Mayfield awardees received National Institutes of Health funding as PI, and 7 awardees received Department of Defense funding as PI. Of the Kuntz awards, 95.3% were awarded to males. Most awards were given to current residents and fellows (46.3%). Of the 55 unique Kuntz awardees who completed training, 31 (56.4%) held faculty appointments at academic medical centers. The abstract-to-publication rate of the total Kuntz abstracts was 70.5%. The mean h-index of all Kuntz awardees was 15 and the mean number of publications was 58. Five Kuntz awardees (3.4%) received federal research funding as PI. Many recipients of the JANE, Mayfield, and Kuntz Joint Spine Section awards have successfully translated award abstracts into peer-reviewed publications. Furthermore, approximately one-third of the awardees are active in academic neurosurgery, with some having secured federal research funding.

Significant Variability in Postoperative Thromboprophylaxis in Cushing's Disease Patients: A Survey of the North American Skull Base Society and the AANS/CNS Joint Tumor Section.

Introduction Cushing's disease (CD) is associated with hypercoagulability which is associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolic events (VTEs) perioperatively. This risk persists even after successful transsphenoidal surgery (TSS). However, there are no current guidelines for pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis in this patient population. Objective Characterize existing thromboprophylaxis management practices in patients undergoing TSS for CD. Methods An anonymous RedCap survey comprised of questions about perioperative thromboprophylaxis in CD patients was distributed via the American Association of Neurological Surgeons (AANS)/Congress of Neurological Surgeons (CNS) Joint Tumor Section and the North American Skull Base Society (NASBS) email lists. Results The survey was distributed to 554 members of the AANS/CNS Joint Tumor Section and 1,094 members of NASBS asking that members who surgically treat CD respond. Sixty responses (3.0% response rate) were received. Fifty-two (86.7%) respondents are involved in the postoperative management of CD patients. Thirty-six (69.2%) treat all patients with postoperative VTE chemoprophylaxis, 8 (15.4%) treat some patients, while 8 (15.4%) do not use chemoprophylaxis. Preferred chemoprophylaxis varies as 26 (59.1%) administer low molecular weight heparin, 14 (31.8%) give unfractionated heparin, 1 (2.3%) give direct oral anticoagulants, and 3 (6.8%) give aspirin. Most (28, 53.8%) of the respondents perceive the VTE risk in this patient population to be 0 to 5%, 16 (30.8%) perceive the risk to be 6 to 10%, and 8 (15.4%) perceive it to be 11 to 20%. Conclusion There is great variability in VTE detection and postoperative prevention practice patterns in CD patients. This study highlights the need for prospective studies to clarify optimal pharmacologic chemoprophylaxis strategies and duration in this patient population.

GPT-4 Artificial Intelligence Model Outperforms ChatGPT, Medical Students, and Neurosurgery Residents on Neurosurgery Written Board-Like Questions

Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning have transformed health care with applications in various specialized fields. Neurosurgery can benefit from artificial intelligence in surgical planning, predicting patient outcomes, and analyzing neuroimaging data. GPT-4, an updated language model with additional training parameters, has exhibited exceptional performance on standardized exams. This study examines GPT-4's competence on neurosurgical board-style questions, comparing its performance with medical students and residents, to explore its potential in medical education and clinical decision-making. GPT-4's performance was examined on 643 Congress of Neurological Surgeons Self-Assessment Neurosurgery Exam (SANS) board-style questions from various neurosurgery subspecialties. Of these, 477 were text-based and 166 contained images. GPT-4 refused to answer 52 questions that contained no text. The remaining 591 questions were inputted into GPT-4, and its performance was evaluated based on first-time responses. Raw scores were analyzed across subspecialties and question types, and then compared to previous findings on Chat Generative pre-trained transformer performance against SANS users, medical students, and neurosurgery residents. GPT-4 attempted 91.9% of Congress of Neurological Surgeons SANS questions and achieved 76.6% accuracy. The model's accuracy increased to 79.0% for text-only questions. GPT-4 outperformed Chat Generative pre-trained transformer (P < 0.001) and scored highest in pain/peripheral nerve (84%) and lowest in spine (73%) categories. It exceeded the performance of medical students (26.3%), neurosurgery residents (61.5%), and the national average of SANS users (69.3%) across all categories. GPT-4 significantly outperformed medical students, neurosurgery residents, and the national average of SANS users. The mode's accuracy suggests potential applications in educational settings and clinical decision-making, enhancing provider efficiency, and improving patient care.

Telovelar/Transcerebellomedullary Fissure Approach: Giant Distal Posterior Inferior Cerebellar Artery Aneurysm, Epidermoid Cyst, and Brainstem Cavernoma: 2-Dimensional Operative Video.

The telovelar or transcerebellomedullary fissure approach can provide wide exposure of the cerebellomedullary fissure and fourth ventricle by separating the natural plane between the medulla and cerebellum.1-5. The cerebellar tonsil is attached to the adjacent cerebellum only by the tonsillar peduncle at its superolateral edge.2 The posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA) runs in the cerebellomedullary fissure, usually making its caudal and cranial loops.6,7. After widely opening the foramen magnum, the tonsil is gently elevated by shearing the tela choroidea up to the lateral recess from the taenia, where the vein of the inferior cerebellar peduncle courses.8,9. The developed occipital sinus, posterior condylar vein, and anomalies of the vertebral artery and PICA origin can obstruct the exposure. Detailed neuromonitoring is essential for accomplishing the procedure safely.10,11. This exposure can be extended to the lower cerebellopontine angle and can also be applied to the dorsal brainstem surgery.2,12 The patients consented to the procedure and to the publication of their images.Image Credits: Department of Neurosurgery, Tokyo Medical University logo used by permission. Image at 0:10, 1:02, 2:46, 6:22, and 7:10 from Matsushima and Kohno,1 used by permission from Medical View Co., Ltd.Right image at 0:14 and also upper image at 0:46, image at 1:26, and for left and lower right images at 1:54 from Matsushima et al,2 by permission from Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG). Left image at 0:14, from Matsushima et al,4 used by permission from the Congress of Neurological Surgeons. Lower image at 0:46 reprinted from Matsushima et al,9 by permission from Elsevier. Left image at 1:06 from Matsushima et al,8 used by permission from the Congress of Neurological Surgeons.Image at top right at 1:54 from Lister et al,6 used by permission from the Congress of Neurological Surgeons. Image in center at 6:56 from Matsushima et al,11 used by permission from Springer Nature. Image at right at 6:56 from Matsushima et al,10 used by permission from JNSPG. Images at 9:48, by year: 1982 article screenshot and figure from Matsushima et al,4 by permission from the Congress of Neurological Surgeons; 1992: article title screenshot from Matsushima et al,3 by permission from the Congress of Neurological Surgeons; 1996: used with permission of McGraw-Hill Health Professions Division, from Microsurgical Anatomy of the Fourth Ventrical, Matshushiam T and Rhoton AL Jr, in Neurosurgery, eds Wilkins and Rengachary, vol 1, 1996, permission conveyed through Copyright Clearance Center, Inc.; 2000: article title screenshot from Mussi et al,5 reused with permission from JNSPG; 2001: article title screenshot from Matsushima, Transcerebellomedullary fissure approach with special reference to methods of dissecting the fissure, J Neurosurg, vol 91, 2001, p. 257-264, by permission from JNSPG; 2021: article title screenshot from Matsushima et al,12 by permission from Springer Nature. Images at 11:05 from Inoue T et al, "Surgical approach to the mesencephalic vascular malformation" [in Japanese], Surg Cereb Stroke, vol 26, 1998, p 288-289, by permission from the Japanese Society on Surgery for Cerebral Stroke. Cadaveric image at 11:56 from Matsushima T et al, "Exposure of the wide interior of the fourth ventricle without splitting the vermis: importance of cutting procedures for the tela choroidea" Neurosurg Rev, vol 35, 2012, p 563-571, used with permission from Springer Nature.

Letter: Commentary: The Anatomy of Disvalued Codes: The 63047 and the 22633.

Letter: Commentary: The Anatomy of Disvalued Codes: The 63047 and the 22633.

Robustness of Randomized Control Trials Supporting Current Neurosurgery Guidelines.

Treatment guidelines in neurosurgery are often based on evidence obtained from randomized controlled trials (RCTs). To evaluate the robustness of RCTs supporting current central nervous tumor and cerebrovascular disease guidelines by calculating their fragility index (FI)-the minimum number of patients needed to switch from an event to nonevent outcome to change significant trial primary outcome. We analyzed RCTs referenced in the Congress of Neurological Surgeons and American Association of Neurological Surgeons guidelines on central nervous tumor and cerebrovascular disease management. Trial characteristics, finding of a statistically significant difference in the primary endpoint favoring the experimental intervention, the FI, and FI minus number lost to follow-up were assessed. Of 312 RCTs identified, 158 (50.6%) were published from 2000 to 2010 and 106 (34%) after 2010. Sixty-three trials (19.2%) were categorized as surgical trials, and the rest studied medical treatment (82.0%) or percutaneous intervention (8.33%). The trials had a median power of 80.0% (IQR 80.0-90.0). Of these, 120 trials were eligible for FI calculation. The median FI was 7.0 (IQR 2.0-16.25). Forty-four (36.6%) trials had FI ≤ 3 indicating very low robustness. After adjusting for covariates, recently published trials and trials studying percutaneous interventions were associated with significantly higher FI compared with older trials and trials comparing surgical approaches, respectively. Trials limited to single centers were associated with significantly lower FI. Trials supporting current guidelines on neuro-oncological and neurovascular surgical interventions have low robustness. While the robustness of trials has improved over time, future guidelines must take into consideration this metric in their recommendations.

Cavernous Malformations: What They Have Taught Us.

Cavernous Malformations: What They Have Taught Us.

Access.

Access.

Representation of female neurosurgeons as abstract authors at neurological surgery conferences.

Female neurosurgeon representation has increased, but women still represent only 8.4% of neurosurgeons in the US. Women are significantly underrepresented as authors in neurosurgical and spine journals, a key indicator of professional success in academic medicine. In this study, the authors aimed to assess the gender diversity of first and last authors of accepted abstracts at neurosurgical conferences in 2015 and 2019. Annual meeting abstracts for 2015 and 2019 of the American Association of Neurological Surgeons (AANS), Congress of Neurological Surgeons (CNS), and pediatrics, spine, stereotactic and functional surgery, and cerebrovascular AANS/CNS subspecialty sections were obtained and analyzed for gender. Partial data were obtained for tumor and pain sections. Composite gender data were obtained from the societies. Percentage differences were calculated using comparison of proportions testing. Overall, female neurosurgeons accounted for only 8.3% of first and 5.8% of last authors, and 7.2% of authors overall. The pediatrics section had the highest proportion of female neurosurgeons as first (13.7%) and last (12.4%) abstract authors, while the spine section had the lowest proportions of female neurosurgeon first (4.6%) and last (2.0%) authors. Qualitatively, a higher proportion of women were first authors, while a higher proportion of men were last authors. Overall, there was no significant change in female neurosurgeon authorship between 2015 and 2019. With regard to society demographics, female neurosurgeons accounted for only 6.3% of AANS membership. The pediatrics section had the highest proportion of female neurosurgeons at 18.1% and the stereotactic and functional surgery section had the lowest of the subspecialty sections (7.6%). While female neurosurgeons represented 12.6% of spine section membership, they represented only 4.7% of first authors (-7.9% difference; p < 0.0001) and 2.4% of last authors (-10.2% difference; p < 0.0001). For the 2019 cerebrovascular section, female neurosurgeons were underrepresented as presenting authors (5.8%) compared with their membership representation (14.8%, -9.0% difference; p = 0.0018). Despite an increase in the number of female neurosurgeons, there has not been a corresponding increase in the proportion of female neurosurgeons as abstract authors at annual neurosurgery conferences, and female neurosurgeons remain underrepresented as authors compared with their male colleagues.

Humbled to Serve.

Humbled to Serve.

Humbled to Serve.

Humbled to Serve.

Does the Number of Levels of Decompression Have an Impact on the Clinical Outcomes of Patients With Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: A Retrospective Study in Single-Level Fused Patients.

IntroductionThe American Association of Neurological Surgeons (AANS) and the Congress of Neurological Surgeons (CNS) 2014 lumbar fusion guidelines for stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS) support surgical decompression and fusion as an effective treatment option for symptomatic stenosis associated with DS. The association between the number of levels decompressed in patients with single-level fusion and clinical outcomes has never been published.MethodsA retrospective analysis of a single-center, prospectively collected database was performed on 77 patients to compare the effect of the number of decompression levels in patients that received single-level fusion surgery. A total of 77 patients met the criteria. Group one had one level decompressed, group two had two levels decompressed, and group three had three or four levels decompressed. All patients received lumbar fusion surgery at a single spinal level. Outcomes at six months included: Substantial Clinical Benefit (SCB) (ΔODI ≥ 10 points); Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) (ΔODI ≥ 5); no MCID (ΔODI <5 points). Student's t-tests, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), and post hoc comparison using unpaired two-tailed student's t-test with Holm-Bonferroni correction were performed. p -values were ranked from smallest to largest, and alpha level adjustments were made. ResultsA sub-analysis of each group's clinical outcomes showed that patients with two levels decompressed reached greater clinical outcomes. SCB was obtained by approximately 60% (group one: 12.5% vs. group three: 40%) of the patients. A total of 77.6% (38/49) achieved MCID (group one: 62.5% vs. group three: 55%). Single-level fused patients with two levels of decompression showed an improvement of 48% from baseline ODI, as opposed to group one: 17.85% and group three: 21.1%. Patients belonging to group two showed the lowest rate of no improvement. Baseline ODI scores were similar upon presentation (p=0.46), and the difference was found among groups after six months of follow-up (p=0.009). Post hoc comparison showed statistical significance in the comparison between group two and group three (p=0.009, alpha value: 0.017).ConclusionThe addition of more than two levels of decompression to single-level fused patients might be associated with poor clinical outcomes and spinal instability.