Introduction: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of lung ultrasonography (US) in detecting the cause of acute respiratory distress in the emergency department. Methods: This cross-sectional analytical study was carried out on 195 adult patients who were admitted to the Emergency Department of a University Hospital with acute respiratory failure in 6months period. The validity of the US diagnoses was assessed by comparing the decisions made by researchers according to the BLUE protocol classification with the final judgments made by the primary doctors using gold-standard diagnostic techniques suggested by the guidelines. Results: The diagnostic accuracy of lung US was 89.7%. While Congestive Heart Failure (CHF) (n=91), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) (n=53), pneumonia (n=69), and Pneumothorax (PTX) (n=5) could be diagnosed by ultrasound with high sensitivity and specificity, its specificity in the diagnosis of Pulmonary Thromboembolism (PTE)(n=18) was low (67%). Ultrasonography could also diagnose combined pathologies such as pneumonia associated with CHF, or pneumonia associated with COPD, with high sensitivity and specificity. It has been determined that the diagnostic accuracy of the routine physical examination and lung radiography used in the emergency room to assess bedside respiratory distress is lower than that of ultrasonography. Discussion: In this study, we found that lung US was effective in the diagnosis of CHF, COPD, pneumonia, PTE, and PTX. Compared to the gold standard tests, it shortened the duration of the diagnosis. Finally, US can also be applied safely in centers where advanced diagnostic facilities are not available.
Read full abstract