BackgroundBeta-blockers are commonly used drugs during pregnancy, especially in women with heart disease, and are regarded as relatively safe although evidence is sparse. Differences between beta-blockers are not well-studied. MethodsIn the Registry of Pregnancy And Cardiac disease (ROPAC, n = 5739), a prospective global registry of pregnancies in women with structural heart disease, perinatal outcomes (small for gestational age (SGA), birth weight, neonatal congenital heart disease (nCHD) and perinatal mortality) were compared between women with and without beta-blocker exposure, and between different beta-blockers. Multivariable regression analysis was used for the effect of beta-blockers on birth weight, SGA and nCHD (after adjustment for maternal and perinatal confounders). ResultsBeta-blockers were used in 875 (15.2%) ROPAC pregnancies, with metoprolol (n = 323, 37%) and bisoprolol (n = 261, 30%) being the most frequent. Women with beta-blocker exposure had more SGA infants (15.3% vs 9.3%, p < 0.001) and nCHD (4.7% vs 2.7%, p = 0.001). Perinatal mortality rates were not different (1.4% vs 1.9%, p = 0.272). The adjusted mean difference in birth weight was −177 g (−5.8%), the adjusted OR for SGA was 1.7 (95% CI 1.3–2.1) and for nCHD 2.3 (1.6–3.5). With metoprolol as reference, labetalol (0.2, 0.1–0.4) was the least likely to cause SGA, and atenolol (2.3, 1.1–4.9) the most. ConclusionsIn women with heart disease an association was found between maternal beta-blocker use and perinatal outcomes. Labetalol seems to be associated with the lowest risk of developing SGA, while atenolol should be avoided.