Confirmatory Phase Research Articles

Metaverse in tourism: tourist involvement as a moderator

ABSTRACT This paper aims to identify barriers and enablers of the growing use of Metaverse in tourism by examining users’ intention in selecting a tourist location and hotel for vacation. It employs a mixed methods approach conducted in two phases, namely exploratory and confirmatory. The grounded theory’s twin slate approach allows extracting the factors in the first exploratory phase. The second (confirmatory) phase employs structural equation modeling to analyze the data. The results show that the Perceived Usage Barrier, Perceived Risk Barriers, and Perceived Value Barriers pose as significant barriers to the adoption of the Metaverse.

Pharmacokinetics, Safety, Tolerability, and Exploratory Efficacy of Upadacitinib in Children with Severe Atopic Dermatitis

PurposeThis study aims to characterize the pharmacokinetics, safety, tolerability, and exploratory efficacy of upadacitinib, an oral Janus kinase inhibitor approved for treating moderate to severe atopic dermatitis (AD) in adults and adolescents, in children with severe AD. MethodsIn an open-label, multiple-dose, Phase 1 study, pediatric patients with severe AD from two age groups (2 to <6 years and 6 to <12 years) received bodyweight-based dosing regimens of upadacitinib using either twice-daily immediate-release (IR) oral solution or once-daily extended-release (ER) tablets. A pharmacokinetic assessment was conducted on Day 7 of the study, which was followed by a long-term safety and exploratory efficacy evaluation for up to 108 weeks. The results reported here are based on an interim analysis when the study had completed enrollment and pharmacokinetic assessment. FindingsA total of 35 patients were enrolled and received upadacitinib. The maximum upadacitinib plasma concentration was attained within a median time of 0.5 to 2 hours and 2 to 2.5 hours for the IR oral solution and ER tablet formulations, respectively. Upadacitinib functional half-life was generally shorter with IR oral solution relative to ER tablets. Upadacitinib apparent oral clearance decreased with decreasing body weight in the pediatric patients enrolled in this study. Upadacitinib was generally safe and well tolerated. The most common (≥3 patients) adverse events were upper respiratory tract infection, COVID-19 infection, headache, abdominal discomfort, vomiting, asthma, and cough. No new safety risks were identified compared to the known safety profile for upadacitinib in adults and adolescents. In the 30 patients with available exploratory efficacy data at Week 12, 36.7% achieved validated Investigator's Global Assessment scale for AD score of 0 or 1 (Validated Investigator Global Assessment for AD 0/1), and 70.0% had Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) improvement of at least 75% (EASI 75). ImplicationsThe characterized pharmacokinetic profiles in this study, together with the observed safety and exploratory efficacy results, support further investigation of the current upadacitinib dosing regimen in future confirmatory Phase 3 clinical trials in children with AD.Clinical Trial Number: NCT03646604, registered 2018-08-23

Protocol for a single-arm, multicenter, prospective, confirmatory phase III trial of wedge resection for invasive ground glass opacity-featured lung cancer with a size ≤2 cm and a consolidation tumor ratio between 0.25 and 0.5 (ECTOP-1020 study).

Segmentectomy is the current standard treatment for ground glass opacity (GGO)-featured lung cancer patients with a tumor size ≤2 cm and a consolidation tumor ratio (CTR) between 0.25 and 0.5. However, compared with wedge resection, segmentectomy destroys the patient's hilar structure and consumes more lung parenchyma. A recent study demonstrated that wedge resection could yield comparable results for this group of patients. This study aimed to confirm the noninferiority of wedge resection over standard surgery in invasive GGO-featured lung cancer patients with a size ≤2 cm and a CTR between 0.25 and 0.5, as measured by 5-year overall survival (OS). The primary endpoint is 5-year OS. The secondary endpoints are 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS), the R0 resection rate, pulmonary function, recurrence and metastasis sites, and adverse events after surgery. During the trial period, 286 patients are enrolled from six Chinese institutions. The primary results of this study will be actively disseminated through manuscript publications and conference presentations. This prospective study will evaluate the surgical efficacy and safety of wedge resection for small (tumor size ≤2 cm with a CTR between 0.25 and 0.5) invasive GGO-featured lung cancer and will support the standardization of this surgical strategy. This trial has been registered on ClinicalTrial.gov (No. NCT06102161).

Pharmacological properties and clinical development overview of pertuzumab (genetical recombination), trastuzumab (genetical recombination) and vorhyaluronidase alfa (genetical recombination) (PHESGO® combination for ‍subcutaneous injection MA, IN)

Pertuzumab and trastuzumab are anti-HER2 humanized monoclonal antibodies with different mechanisms of action. Their combination is expected to suppress intracellular HER2 signaling additively or synergistically. Their combination is widely recommended worldwide and has been established as a standard of care for HER2-positive breast cancer. However, improvement is required because of the prolonged time of intravenous infusion. Vorhyaluronidase alfa (rHuPH20) depolymerizes hyaluronan in the subcutaneous connective tissue. It's reported to increase the permeability and absorption levels of drugs. PHESGO® combination for subcutaneous injection MA/IN (PHESGO®) is a fixed-dose combination of pertuzumab, trastuzumab, and rHuPH20. A confirmatory phase III study (FeDeriCa) was conducted following a dose-finding phase I study (BO30185). Patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer were randomly assigned to receive either intravenous infusion of pertuzumab and trastuzumab or subcutaneous injection of PHESGO®, in combination with chemotherapy, to compare the pharmacokinetics (PK), efficacy and safety. A phase II study (PHranceSCa) was also conducted to assess patients' preference and satisfaction. Based on these results, population PK analysis, and other data, PHESGO® obtained marketing approval in Japan in September 2023 with indications for "HER2-positive breast cancer" and "advanced or recurrent HER2-positive colorectal cancer that has progressed following cancer chemotherapy and is not amenable to curative resection". By reducing the administration time, PHESGO® is expected to contribute to various needs of patients and improvement of their daily lives. Since drug preparation is not required, it can provide convenience to healthcare professionals, leading to stress reduction of medical resources as well.

Consistent efficacy and safety of sublingual immunotherapy tablets across allergens and geographic regions.

Background: The clinical development program of the SQ grass, ragweed, tree, and house dust mite (HDM) sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT)-tablets for allergic rhinitis/conjunctivitis (AR/C) included clinical trials conducted in North America, Europe, and Japan. Objective: Data from these trials were analyzed to assess efficacy, immunologic mechanisms, and safety outcomes across allergens and geographic regions. Methods: Thirteen phase III, double-blind, placebo controlled trials in the subjects with AR/C were conducted in North America, Europe (including Russia), and Japan (N = 7763 analyzed). Trials were generally similar with respect to medical practice, target population, eligibility criteria, and efficacy and safety monitoring. Data were analyzed for the approved doses in North America and Europe. Four statistical models were used to enhance comparison of the efficacy end points among the trials. Results: The SLIT-tablets demonstrated consistent efficacy across allergens and regions, regardless of the statistical analysis used. Relative improvement in the primary efficacy end point compared with placebo by using the predefined protocol analysis ranged from 17.9% to 32.8%, 17.5% to 19.3%, 20.6% to 38.3%, and 39.6% with the grass, HDM, ragweed, and tree SLIT-tablets, respectively. The kinetics of specific immunoglobulin E (IgE) and IgG4 responses were similar among the allergens and regions. Local application-site reactions were the most common adverse events for all allergens and in all regions. Most treatment-related adverse events for all allergens and in all regions were mild in severity. The rate of systemic allergic reactions was similar across regions (0%-0.54%). Conclusion: Confirmatory phase III trials for SLIT-tablets in the treatment of AR/C showed consistent efficacy, immunologic, and safety outcomes across allergens and geographic regions.

OPTIMIZE-1 primary analysis: Safety, efficacy and biomarker results of a phase 1b/2 study combining CD40 agonist mitazalimab with mFOLFIRINOX in previously untreated metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC).

4133 Background: With a 5 year overall survival (OS) rate &lt;5%, PDAC is a leading cause of cancer related mortality. Currently available systemic therapies are not curative and new therapeutic options are needed. Mitazalimab is a human CD40 agonistic IgG1antibody that reduces immune suppression, sensitizes the tumor to chemotherapy, and induces long lasting anti-tumor T cell responses. OPTIMIZE-1 (NCT04888312) is a Phase 1b/2, open label, multicenter study assessing mitazalimab's safety and efficacy combined with mFOLFIRINOX (mFFX) in chemotherapy naïve mPDAC patients (pts). Methods: In the first 21 day cycle, mitazalimab was administered on day 1 and 10 and mFFX infusion started on day 8. In subsequent cycles, treatment followed a 14 day cycle with mitazalimab given 2 days after mFFX. The primary endpoint is objective response rate (ORR) compared to 30% ORR for FFX (Conroy, 2011) (80% power; α (1-sided) =0.10). Secondary and exploratory endpoints include Duration of Response (DoR), progression free survival (PFS), OS, safety, PK and PD biomarker assessments. Results: Seventy pts with mPDAC were treated with mFFX + mitazalimab (safety set: 5 at 450 µg/kg and 65 at 900 µg/kg). 57 patients at 900 µg/kg received ≥2 treatment cycles and were efficacy evaluable. The most common grade ≥3 AEs were neutropenia (25.7%), anemia (11.4%), hypokalemia (15.7%) and thrombocytopenia (11.4%), consistent with FFX safety profile. Two pts discontinued treatment due to AEs. Confirmed ORs were observed in 23 pts (40.4%), including 1 complete responder (CR). Median OS, PFS and duration of Response (DoR) were 14.3 months (mo), 7.4 mo and 12.5 mo respectively, with a median follow up of 12.7 mo. 29 pts (51%) remain in the study (32% on treatment, 19% in survival follow up). Efficacy results including correlation with detected KRAS G12 mutations are summarized (Table). Conclusions: Mitazalimab in combination with mFFX is a feasible regimen with a manageable safety profile. The primary endpoint was met; KRAS G12 V and R mutations were associated with better efficacy. Given the promising DoR linked with survival benefit in previously untreated mPDAC, these results merit continued development of mitazalimab in a confirmatory phase 3 study. Clinical trial information: NCT04888312 . [Table: see text]

The efficacy of real versus sham external Trigeminal Nerve Stimulation (eTNS) in youth with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) over 4 weeks: a protocol for a multi-centre, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group, phase IIb study (ATTENS)

BackgroundAttention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), if severe, is usually treated with stimulant or non-stimulant medication. However, users prefer non-drug treatments due to side effects. Alternative non-medication treatments have so far only shown modest effects. External trigeminal nerve stimulation (eTNS) is a minimal risk, non-invasive neuromodulation device, targeting the trigeminal system. It was approved for ADHD in 2019 by the USA Food and Drug administration (FDA) based on a small proof of concept randomised controlled trial (RCT) in 62 children with ADHD showing improvement of ADHD symptoms after 4 weeks of nightly real versus sham eTNS with minimal side effects. We present here the protocol of a larger confirmatory phase IIb study testing efficacy, longer-term persistency of effects and underlying mechanisms of action.MethodsA confirmatory, sham-controlled, double-blind, parallel-arm, multi-centre phase IIb RCT of 4 weeks of eTNS in 150 youth with ADHD, recruited in London, Portsmouth, and Southampton, UK. Youth with ADHD will be randomized to either real or sham eTNS, applied nightly for 4 weeks. Primary outcome is the change in the investigator-administered parent rated ADHD rating scale. Secondary outcomes are other clinical and cognitive measures, objective hyperactivity and pupillometry measures, side effects, and maintenance of effects over 6 months. The mechanisms of action will be tested in a subgroup of 56 participants using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) before and after the 4-week treatment.DiscussionThis multi-centre phase IIb RCT will confirm whether eTNS is effective in a larger age range of children and adolescents with ADHD, whether it improves cognition and other clinical measures, whether efficacy persists at 6 months and it will test underlying brain mechanisms. The results will establish whether eTNS is effective and safe as a novel non-pharmacological treatment for ADHD.Trial registration: ISRCTN82129325 on 02/08/2021, https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN82129325.

A two-stage group-sequential design for delayed treatment responses with the possibility of trial restart.

Common statistical theory applicable to confirmatory phase III trial designs usually assumes that patients are enrolled simultaneously and there is no time gap between enrollment and outcome observation. However, in practice, patients are enrolled successively and there is a lag between the enrollment of a patient and the measurement of the primary outcome. For single-stage designs, the difference between theory and practice only impacts on the trial duration but not on the statistical analysis and its interpretation. For designs with interim analyses, however, the number of patients already enrolled into the trial and the number of patients with available outcome measurements differ, which can cause issues regarding the statistical analyses of the data. The main issue is that current methodologies either imply that at the time of the interim analysis there are so-called pipeline patients whose data are not used to make a statistical decision (like stopping early for efficacy) or the enrollment into the trial needs to be at least paused for interim analysis to avoid pipeline patients. There are methods for delayed responses available that introduced error-spending stopping boundaries for the enrollment of patients followed by critical values to reject the null hypothesis in case the stopping boundaries have been crossed beforehand. Here, we will discuss other solutions, considering different boundary determination algorithms using conditional power and introducing a design allowing for recruitment restart while keeping the type I error rate controlled.

Flexible seamless 2-in-1 design with sample size adaptation

ABSTRACT The 2-in-1 design is becoming popular in oncology drug development, with the flexibility in using different endpoints at different decision time. Based on the observed interim data, sponsors can choose to seamlessly advance a small phase 2 trial to a full-scale confirmatory phase 3 trial with a pre-determined maximum sample size or remain in a phase 2 trial. While this approach may increase efficiency in drug development, it is rigid and requires a pre-specified fixed sample size. In this paper, we propose a flexible 2-in-1 design with sample size adaptation, while retaining the advantage of allowing an intermediate endpoint for interim decision-making. The proposed design reflects the needs of the recent FDA’s Project FrontRunner initiative, which encourages the use of an earlier surrogate endpoint to potentially support accelerated approval with conversion to standard approval with long-term endpoints from the same randomized study. Additionally, we identify the interim decision cut-off to allow a conventional test procedure at the final analysis. Extensive simulation studies showed that the proposed design requires much a smaller sample size and shorter timeline than the simple 2-in-1 design, while achieving similar power. We present a case study in multiple myeloma to demonstrate the benefits of the proposed design.

Abstract 1191: Personalized neoantigen DNA vaccine GNOS-PV02 and pembrolizumab as second-line treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

Abstract Background: PD-1 inhibitors have modest efficacy as monotherapy in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). A personalized therapeutic cancer vaccine (PTCV) tailored against neoantigens identified in an individual’s tumor may enhance responses to PD-1 inhibitors through the induction of tumor-specific immunity. Here, we present results from a single-arm Phase Ib/2a trial evaluating a DNA plasmid (GNOS-PV02) encoding up to 40 neoantigens co-administered with plasmid-encoded IL-12 (pIL12) in combination with pembrolizumab (PEMBRO) in patients (pts) with advanced HCC.Methods: Pts were eligible for study therapy upon progression or intolerance with a 1L tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). The PTCV [GNOS-PV02 (1mg) and pIL12 (0.34mg)] was administered intradermally via in vivo electroporation Q3w x 4 doses, and Q9w thereafter. PEMBRO was administered at 200mg IV Q3w. The primary endpoints were safety and immunogenicity. To evaluate the secondary endpoint of ORR per RECIST 1.1 by investigator review with a null hypothesis of an ORR of 16.9% (KN-240, Finn et al ASCO 2019), 36 pts were included to provide 80% power to reject the null hypothesis at the one-sided 0.10 level, assuming the true ORR rate of 33.1%. The data cut date was August 18, 2023.Results: Among the 36 enrolled pts who received at least one dose of treatment, there were no DLTs or treatment-related grade ≥3 events. The most common treatment-related adverse events were injection site reactions, observed in 41.6% of pts. ORR (mITT) per RECIST 1.1 was 30.6% (11/36; 9 confirmed and 2 unconfirmed) with 8.3% (3/36) of pts achieving a CR. This achieved statistical significance with a one-sided p-value = 0.031 (1-sided 90% CI 20.4%-100%) The mOS was 19.9 months. ctDNA changes correlated with radiographic responses and preceded them. A complete molecular response (100% ctDNA clearance) was detected in 7 pts including the 3 radiographic CRs, and 4 additional pts who continue to show durable tumor control (3PR, 1 SD). Immunological analyses confirmed the induction of neoantigen-specific T cell responses by IFNγ-ELISpot in 19/22 (86.4%) evaluable pts, and pts with a larger ELISpot response showed a trend towards longer OS. Multi-parametric cellular profiling and single-cell analysis revealed active, proliferative, and cytolytic vaccine-specific CD4+ and CD8+ effector T cells in the blood of immunized pts. In 14/14 (100%) of pts with paired pre- and on-treatment blood and tumor biopsies, we identified by TCRβ bulk sequencing expanded T cell clones in the peripheral blood that also trafficked into the tumor. Conclusions: Our results show that a PTCV plus PEMBRO is well tolerated and has clinical activity in pts with advanced HCC, and support the PTCV mechanism of action based on the induction of anti-tumor T cells in peripheral blood and tumor. A confirmatory phase 3 clinical study assessing OS is planned. Citation Format: Mark Yarchoan, Edward J. Gane, Thomas U. Marron, Renzo Perales-Linares, Jian Yan, Neil Cooch, Daniel Shu, Elana J. Fertig, Luciane T. Kagohara, Gabor Bartha, Josette Northcott, John Lyle, Sarah Rochestie, Joann Peters, Jason Connor, Elizabeth Jaffee, Alfredo Perales-Puchalt, David B. Weiner, Ildiko Csiki, Niranjan Y. Sardesai. Personalized neoantigen DNA vaccine GNOS-PV02 and pembrolizumab as second-line treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 1191.

A class of computational methods to reduce selection bias when designing Phase 3 clinical trials.

When designing confirmatory Phase 3 studies, one usually evaluates one or more efficacious and safe treatment option(s) based on data from previous studies. However, several retrospective research articles reported the phenomenon of "diminished treatment effect in Phase 3" based on many case studies. Even under basic assumptions, it was shown that the commonly used estimator could substantially overestimate the efficacy of selected group(s). As alternatives, we propose a class of computational methods to reduce estimation bias and mean squared error with a broader scope of multiple treatment groups and flexibility to accommodate summary results by group as input. Based on simulation studies and a real data example, we provide practical implementation guidance for this class of methods under different scenarios. For more complicated problems, our framework can serve as a starting point with additional layers built in. Proposed methods can also be widely applied to other selection problems.

P998 Phase 2 basket design study evaluating the efficacy and safety of an anti-TL1A antibody (TEV-48574) in moderate to severe ulcerative colitis or Crohn's Disease (RELIEVE UCCD)

Abstract Background TEV-48574 is a human antibody that targets tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-like ligand 1A, also known as TNF superfamily member 15 (TNFSF15). TEV-48574 is being evaluated in the first basket design trial in IBD. The basket design is uniquely suited for the efficient assessment of TEV-48574 as evidence suggests that TL1A signaling plays a key role in both ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn’s disease (CD). TL1A signaling is not a primary driver but an amplifier of inflammation; thus, targeting TL1A should mitigate excessive immune responses while leaving baseline immunity intact. Originating in oncology trials, the basket trial design has emerged as a new efficient approach for testing treatment efficacy in different disease indications with potentially common molecular mechanisms. The basket design approach allows the evaluation of multiple indications in a single study design that provides adequate support for initiation of confirmatory studies. Additionally, the basket design allows for shared sites and institutional review boards, data collection and analyses under consistent conditions. Herein, we describe the phase 2b basket trial evaluating TEV-48574 in UC and CD (clinicaltrials.gov NCT05499130), currently ongoing along with a long-term extension study (LTE)(NCT05668013). Methods In this double-blind placebo-controlled global study, TEV-48574 or placebo is administered subcutaneously to adults (n = 240) diagnosed with moderate-to-severe IBD (UC (n = 120) or CD (n = 120)). Patients who meet pre-specified inclusion/exclusion criteria are randomized to either one of two TEV-48574 dose regimens or placebo in a 1:1:1 ratio (stratified by diagnosis (UC or CD) and previous exposure to advanced IBD therapy(biologics and small molecules)) for 14 weeks. Patients who complete the 14-week induction period have the option to enter the LTE, consisting of a 44-week maintenance period for responders and a re-induction period for non-responders. Primary efficacy endpoints are induction of clinical remission (a modified Mayo Score of ≤2 points for UC), and endoscopic response (a reduction in Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease (SES-CD) of ≥ 50% from baseline) for CD, at week 14. A Bayesian approach will be used to compute posterior probabilities for the response endpoints within each indication. Additional endpoints include safety assessments, measures of clinical response, biomarkers, pharmacokinetics, and immunogenicity. Results Conclusion TEV-48574 is a potential novel treatment option for patients with UC and CD that may have dual antifibrotic and anti-inflammatory effects. The phase 2 basket study design offers an efficient approach to advance TEV-45874to confirmatory phase 3 studies.

Predicting Probability of Success for Phase III Trials via Propensity-Score-Based External Data Borrowing

Given the rising costs and time length of confirmatory phase III trials, drug developers have become increasingly reliant on quantitative methods to support critical decisions such as whether drug should continue development after completing a phase II study. One such method that is commonly used is to estimate the probability of success (PoS) of a phase III trial. PoS is computed by averaging the traditional power function over a prior distribution for the unknown treatment effect, which is often estimated using observed phase II data. However, phase II trials are often small due to budgetary, logistical, or ethical considerations, which can increase the variability of phase II results and provide misleading PoS calculations. In this article, we develop a new PoS framework that leverages external data sources to increase the understanding of the phase II study data and hence the accuracy of PoS calculations. To mitigate the risk of bias associated with external data borrowing, we augment the control arm of the phase II study using the propensity-score-based MAP (PS-MAP) prior, which allow to objectively incorporate patient-level information. We demonstrate via simulation and an example application in non-small cell lung cancer that incorporation of external data into the traditional PoS framework can enable more robust decision-making in clinical development by engendering larger values, on average, when the treatment under study is truly effective and smaller values, on average, when the treatment under study is truly ineffective.

PROOF 301: Results of an early discontinued randomized phase 3 trial of the oral FGFR inhibitor infigratinib vs. gemcitabine plus cisplatin in patients with advanced cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) with an FGFR2 gene fusion/rearrangement.

516 Background: Infigratinib (BGJ398), an oral inhibitor of fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR)1-3 with demonstrated clinical activity and a manageable adverse event profile in a phase 2 study in patients with previously treated, unresectable or metastatic CCA with an FGFR2 fusion or other rearrangement, represented one of the few targeted treatment options after progression on first-line therapy, as per FDA conditional approval. The confirmatory phase III trial PROOF 301 of infigratinib versus gem/cis as frontline treatment of FGFR2 Gene Fusions/Translocations CCA was early discontinued. Here we report the efficacy and safety in the patients accrued prior to termination. Methods: Eligible patients were randomized 2:1 to infigratinib 125 mg on days 1-21 of a 28-day cycle vs intravenous gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2) + cisplatin (25 mg/m2) on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), confirmed by blinded independent central review (BICR). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), investigator determined PFS, overall response rate (ORR), best overall response (BOR), disease control rate (DCR), duration of response (DOR), and safety and tolerability. Crossover to the investigational arm was permitted at progression. Results: Over 40 months, a total of 1127 patients were pre-screened at 120 sites and 48 enrolled. In a 2:1 randomization, 29 patients received infigratinib and 19 received gem/cis. Upon progression, 2 patients crossed over from gem/cis to infigratinib. Median PFS (95% CI) by BICR was 7.4 (5.4, not evaluable [NE]) and 8.0 (3.4, NE) months with infigratinib and chemotherapy, respectively. The ORRs by BICR were 37.9 % with infigratinib and 15.8 % with gem/cis. Grade 3–4 adverse events occurred in 79.3% and 58.8% patients treated with infigratinib and chemotherapy. Conclusions: Infigratinib showed a preliminary signal of efficacy in the first-line treatment of FGFR2-rearranged CCA, but due to early termination of the study, the power is insufficient to draw conclusions regarding its efficacy in comparison to gem/cis. This study highlights the challenge of performing confirmatory studies in biomarker-selected subpopulations of rare tumors and the importance of exploring alternative approaches to delivering confirmatory data for regulatory purposes. Clinical trial information: NCT03773302 .

Feasibility, safety and effectiveness of prednisolone and vitamin B1, B6, and B12 in patients with post-COVID-19-syndrome (PreVitaCOV) – protocol of a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicentre trial in primary care (phase IIIb)

BackgroundAfter infection with SARS-CoV-2 a relevant proportion of patients complains about persisting symptoms, a condition termed Post-COVID-19-syndrome (PC19S). So far, possible treatments are under investigation. Among others, neurotropic vitamins and anti-inflammatory substances are potential options. Thus, the PreVitaCOV trial aims to assess feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of treating patients in primary care with prednisolone and/or vitamin B1, B6 and B12.MethodsThe phase IIIb, multi-centre randomised, double-blind, and placebo-controlled PreVitaCOV trial has a factorial design and is planned as a two-phase approach. The pilot phase assessed feasibility and safety and was transformed into a confirmatory phase to evaluate effectiveness since feasibility was proven. Adult patients with PC19S after a documented SARS-CoV-2 infection at least 12 weeks ago are randomly assigned to 4 parallel treatments: prednisolone 20 mg for five days followed by 5 mg for 23 days (trial drug 1), B vitamins (B1 (100 mg OD), B6 (50 mg OD), and B12 (500 µg OD)) for 28 days (trial drug 2), trial drugs 1 and 2, or placebo. The primary outcome of the pilot phase was defined as the retention rate of the first 100 patients. Values of ≥ 85% were considered as confirmation of feasibility, this criterion was even surpassed by a retention rate of 98%. After transformation, the confirmatory phase proceeds by enrolling 240 additional patients. The primary outcome for the study is the change of symptom severity from baseline to day 28 as assessed by a tailored Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) total score referring to five symptom domains known to be typical for PC19S (fatigue, dyspnoea, cognition, anxiety, depression). The confirmatory trial is considered positive if superiority of any treatment is demonstrated over placebo operationalised by an improvement of at least 3 points on the PROMIS total score (t-score).DiscussionThe PreVitaCOV trial may contribute to the understanding of therapeutic approaches in PC19S in a primary care context.Trial registrationEudraCT: 2022-001041-20. DRKS: DRKS00029617. ClinicalTrials.gov: F001AM02222_1 (registered: 05 Dec 2022).

Digital health technologies and artificial intelligence in cardiovascular clinical trials: A landscape of the European space

The recent pandemic ushered in a marked surge in the adoption of digital health technologies (DHTs), necessitating remote approaches aiming to safeguard both patient and healthcare provider well-being. These technologies encompass an array of terms, including e-health, m-health, telemedicine, wearables, sensors, smartphone apps, digital therapeutics, virtual and augmented reality, and artificial intelligence (AI). Notably, some DHTs employed in critical healthcare decisions may transition into the realm of medical devices, subjecting them to more stringent regulatory scrutiny. Consequently, it is imperative to understand the validation processes of these technologies within clinical studies. Our study summarizes an extensive examination of clinical trials focusing on cardiovascular (CV) diseases and digital health (DH) interventions, with particular attention to those incorporating elements of AI. A dataset comprising 107 eligible trials, registered on clinicaltrials.gov and International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) databases until 19 June 2023, forms the basis of our investigation. We focused on clinical trials employing DHTs in the European context, revealing a diverse landscape of interventions. Devices constitute the predominant category (45.8%), followed by behavioral interventions (17.8%). Within the CV domain, trials predominantly span pivotal or confirmatory phases, with a notable presence of smaller feasibility and exploratory studies. Notably, a majority of trials exhibit randomized, parallel assignment designs. When analyzing the multifaceted landscape of trial outcomes, we identified various categories such as physiological and functional measures, diagnostic accuracy, CV events and mortality, patient outcomes, quality of life, treatment adherence and effectiveness, quality of hospital processes, and usability/feasibility measures. Furthermore, we delve into a subset of 15 studies employing AI and machine learning, describing various study design features, intended purposes and the validation strategies employed. In summary, we aimed to elucidate the diverse applications, study design features, and objectives of the evolving CV-related DHT clinical trials field.

Important statistical points for clinical research: from basics to applications

Clinical research is conducted to investigate physicians' clinical questions and to clarify research hypotheses. When conducting clinical research, it is important to carefully consider the research design in advance. An optimal design that meets the objectives of the study and addresses practical implementation issues is desirable. Randomized comparisons during the final confirmatory phase may be the best tool for comparing treatments. However, not all clinical questions can be answered through randomized controlled trials. This article summarizes the basics of clinical study design and explains the role of randomization. It also introduces a propensity score-based method that has gained attention as a statistical method for comparing treatment groups when randomization is not feasible, and is increasingly being utilized in clinical research.

A comparison of two novel visual read‐based methods for high tau identification from flortaucipir‐PET

AbstractBackgroundTo compare the performances of two novel visual read‐based methods for flortaucipir‐PET in patients with Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) to identify high tau accumulation, defined as AD‐signature weighted neocortical Standardized Uptake Value ratio (SUVr)&gt;1.46.MethodBaseline flortaucipir‐PET scans displaying advanced‐AD tau‐patterns (increased neocortical activity beyond posterior lateral temporal and occipital regions with bindings 1.65‐times higher [1.65x‐visual threshold] than cerebellar average) were utilized from the confirmatory phase of A05 study (N = 78, NCT02016560). Four expert human‐readers conducted reads using two novel visual read‐based methods while being blinded to each other and all quantitative results. The first approach (SUVrmax‐method) requires a reader to visually identify and hand‐draw focal regions‐of‐interest on frontal areas with the highest bindings and calculate an SUVr between the identified frontal maximum and average cerebellum binding. The second approach (Enhanced Read‐method) requires the reader to evaluate binding elevation compared to cerebellum with an enhanced visual threshold, either across gray matter (global, 3.795x‐visual threshold) or only in the frontal lobe (2.805x‐visual threshold), compared to the standard 1.65x‐visual threshold specified in the FDA‐approved Tauvid™ label. Methods were compared to the standard quantitative high tau determination as standard‐of‐truth.ResultBased on a previously found ROC‐determined cut point using computer‐generated SUVrmax values, the SUVrmax‐method showed median 88% Positive Percent Agreement (PPA), 87% Negative Percent Agreement (NPA) and 87% overall accuracy across raters. The Enhanced Read‐method showed median 75% PPA, 88% NPA and 85% overall accuracy and median 81% PPA, 91% NPA and 88% overall accuracy for global and frontal approaches, respectively.ConclusionBoth novel flortaucipir‐PET visual read‐based methods showed comparable and promising performances in identifying AD with high tau, do not require computationally intensive approaches and can be implemented with different imaging software.

A randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled phase 1b study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and pharmacodynamics of an anti‐amyloid‐β antibody SHR‐1707 in patients with mild cognitive impairment and mild Alzheimer’s disease

AbstractBackgroundSHR‐1707 is a humanized monoclonal antibody against amyloid‐β (Aβ). Pharmacodynamic studies in vitro showed that SHR‐1707 is more potent than lecanemab. SHR‐1707 had similar affinity to Aβ fibrils and protofibrils and relatively higher affinity to Aβ monomers than lecanemab. In 5xFAD transgenic mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease (AD), SHR‐1707 safely reduced brain Aβ deposition and ameliorated memory deficits. Phase 1 studies in China (NCT04973189) and Australia (NCT04745104) had demonstrated the safety and tolerability of SHR‐1707 in healthy young adults and elderly subjects at up to 60 mg/kg. The preclinical and clinical evidence support further development of SHR‐1707. Hence, we designed a phase 1b trial of SHR‐1707 to evaluate the safety, effective dosage, and effects on brain Aβ deposition in patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) due to AD or mild AD.MethodThis is a randomized, double‐blind, dose‐escalation, placebo‐controlled phase 1b study (NCT05681819; Figure 1). Patients with MCI due to AD or mild AD aged 55‐85 years will be randomized to placebo or intravenous SHR‐1707 at escalated doses of 5, 10, 20, and 40 mg/kg every 2 weeks for 26 weeks. Randomization will be based on the treatment to placebo ratio of 3:2 for 5 mg/kg dose group (N = 5, ≥3 ApoE ε4 carriers) and 10:2 for the remaining dose groups (for each group: N = 12, ≥5 ApoE ε4 carriers). In the following open‐label extension study, all patients will be assigned to SHR‐1707 for 52 weeks. The primary objective is to assess the safety and tolerability of 26‐week treatment of SHR‐1707. Secondary objectives are to assess effects on brain Aβ deposition by positron‐emission tomography, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles in blood and cerebrospinal fluid, immunogenicity, and clinical efficacy with 26‐week treatment of SHR‐1707; and long‐term safety, tolerability, and effects on brain Aβ deposition with 78‐week treatment. Figure 2 lists all study endpoints.ResultThe study is ongoing in China. Topline results are expected in Q1 2024.ConclusionThis trial will obtain safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, immunogenicity, and clinical efficacy data of SHR‐1707 to support advancement to confirmatory phase 2 or 3 studies in patients with MCI due to AD and mild AD.

Phase 1/2 Multicenter, Open-Label Study of CTX-712 in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Higher Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes

Background and Significance Dysregulation of alternative splicing, caused by abnormal expression or mutation of splicing factors, has been identified as an important contributor to the genesis and progression of cancer, and suggested as a novel target for anticancer treatment. CDC2-like kinases (CLK) represent a family of dual-specificity tyrosine and serine-threonine kinases that are involved in the regulation of splicing by phosphorylation of serine/arginine-rich splicing factors (SRSFs) which play a central role in exon recognition. CTX-712 is an orally available, potent, selective, and a first-in-class pan-CLK inhibitor (CLK 1-4), that inhibits phosphorylation of SRSFs resulting in significant antitumor activity in vitro and multiple xenograft models in vivo. CTX-712 formulated in capsules is currently being evaluated in an ongoing first-in-man study in Japan, evaluating tolerability and early efficacy in patients with solid tumors or hematologic malignancies (JapicCTI-184188). Preliminary data from the Japanese study were presented during ASCO 2022 and ASH 2022, and showed an acceptable safety profile (doses up to 175 mg (MTD 140 mg) twice a week in 28-day cycles, observed DLTs included dehydration, decreased platelets, hypokalemia, and pneumonia) with early signs of clinical antitumor activity (2 partial responses / 26 treated solid tumor patients, 5 complete remissions and complete remission with incomplete hematologic recovery/ 8 treated patients with AML or MDS), warranting further clinical investigations.. (J Clin Oncol (2022) 40(16_suppl):3080. Blood (2022) 140(Supplement 1):6211-2.). This abstract details a second study with CTX-712 that has just been initiated. Study Design and Methods A new film-coated tablet formulation will be evaluated in this phase 1/2 multicenter, open-label study of CTX-712 in patients with (mutated or wild type spliceosomes genes) relapsed/refractory AML, higher risk MDS (IPSS-R intermediate, high, or very high), or high marrow blast (≥5 %) MDS/MPN (including CMML). The phase 1 part of the study will be conducted at 4 US sites, and all sites are currently open for enrolment. The study allows patients with performance status 0, 1, or 2, adequate organ function, and up to four prior lines of therapy. Due to potential risk of interactions (in vitro studies suggest CYP3A4 as main metabolic pathway for CTX-712), concomitant use of strong CYP3A4 inhibitors is prohibited. Use of azole antifungals that are not strong CYP3A4 inhibitors (e.g., isavuconazole) is permitted. The phase 1 part of the study consists of dose-escalation (sequential standard 3 + 3 design), where cohorts of 3 (or 6) patients will receive ascending doses of CTX-712 once weekly in a 28-day cycle with continuous monitoring of emerging clinical PK, PD, safety, and efficacy data, to determine the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) based on the suggestion by the Safety Review Committee (SRC). The protocol defines five different dose levels (20-140 mg, once weekly) but also authorizes the SRC to suggest up to two interim dose levels or alternate schedules (e.g., dosing two times a week) if supported by emerging data. The suggested RP2D will be used in a confirmatory phase 1 expansion cohort where an additional 10 patients (total n = 16; 8 patients with AML and 8 patients with MDS) will be treated to gain further confidence in the selected dose level. The phase 2 part of the study will commence after the RP2D has been identified and confirmed and aims at evaluating therapeutic activity in R/R AML (Cohort 2a) or R/R HR-MDS (Cohort 2b), in addition to confirmation of the safety profile. Clinical trial registry number: NCT05732103