Confirmation Of Correct Tube Placement Research Articles

WITHDRAWN: Techniques to ascertain correct endotracheal tube placement in neonates.

The success rate of correct endotracheal tube (ETT) placement for junior medical staff is less than 50% and accidental oesophageal intubation is common. Rapid confirmation of correct tube placement is important because tube malposition is associated with serious adverse outcomes including hypoxaemia, death, pneumothorax and right upper lobe collapse.ETT position can be confirmed using chest radiography, but this is often delayed; hence, a number of rapid point-of-care methods to confirm correct tube placement have been developed. Current neonatal resuscitation guidelines advise that correct ETT placement should be confirmed by the observation of clinical signs and the detection of exhaled carbon dioxide (CO2). Even though these devices are frequently used in the delivery room to assess tube placement, they can display false-negative results. Recently, newer techniques to assess correct tube placement have emerged (e.g. respiratory function monitor), which have been claimed to be superior in the assessment of tube placement. To assess various techniques for the identification of correct ETT placement after oral or nasal intubation in newborn infants in either the delivery room or neonatal intensive care unit compared with chest radiography. We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL,The Cochrane Library 2012, Issue 4), MEDLINE (January 1996 to June 2014), EMBASE (January 1980 to Juen 2014) and CINAHL (January 1982 to June 2014). We searched clinical trials registers and the abstracts of the Society for Pediatric Research and the European Society for Pediatric Research from 2004 to 2014. We did not apply any language restrictions. We planned to include randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials and cluster trials that compared chest radiography with clinical signs, respiratory function monitors, exhaled CO2 detectors or ultrasound for the assessment of correct ETT placement either in the delivery room or the neonatal intensive care unit. Two review authors independently evaluated the search results against the selection criteria. We did not perform data extraction and 'Risk of bias' assessments because we identified no studies that met our inclusion criteria. We did not identify any studies meeting the criteria for inclusion in this review. There is insufficient evidence to determine the most effective technique for the assessment of correct ETT placement either in the delivery room or the neonatal intensive care unit. Randomised clinical trials comparing either of these techniques with chest radiography are warranted.

Techniques to ascertain correct endotracheal tube placement in neonates.

The success rate of correct endotracheal tube (ETT) placement for junior medical staff is less than 50% and accidental oesophageal intubation is common. Rapid confirmation of correct tube placement is important because tube malposition is associated with serious adverse outcomes including hypoxaemia, death, pneumothorax and right upper lobe collapse.ETT position can be confirmed using chest radiography, but this is often delayed; hence, a number of rapid point-of-care methods to confirm correct tube placement have been developed. Current neonatal resuscitation guidelines advise that correct ETT placement should be confirmed by the observation of clinical signs and the detection of exhaled carbon dioxide (CO2). Even though these devices are frequently used in the delivery room to assess tube placement, they can display false-negative results. Recently, newer techniques to assess correct tube placement have emerged (e.g. respiratory function monitor), which have been claimed to be superior in the assessment of tube placement. To assess various techniques for the identification of correct ETT placement after oral or nasal intubation in newborn infants in either the delivery room or neonatal intensive care unit compared with chest radiography. We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL,The Cochrane Library 2012, Issue 4), MEDLINE (January 1996 to June 2014), EMBASE (January 1980 to Juen 2014) and CINAHL (January 1982 to June 2014). We searched clinical trials registers and the abstracts of the Society for Pediatric Research and the European Society for Pediatric Research from 2004 to 2014. We did not apply any language restrictions. We planned to include randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials and cluster trials that compared chest radiography with clinical signs, respiratory function monitors, exhaled CO2 detectors or ultrasound for the assessment of correct ETT placement either in the delivery room or the neonatal intensive care unit. Two review authors independently evaluated the search results against the selection criteria. We did not perform data extraction and 'Risk of bias' assessments because we identified no studies that met our inclusion criteria. We did not identify any studies meeting the criteria for inclusion in this review. There is insufficient evidence to determine the most effective technique for the assessment of correct ETT placement either in the delivery room or the neonatal intensive care unit. Randomised clinical trials comparing either of these techniques with chest radiography are warranted.

Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Tube Replacement Unexpected Serious Events

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tubes are replaced due to clogging, breaking, and dislodgement. There are potential complications associated with these procedures, including intraperitoneal placement of the tube and peritonitis, which can occur even in the presence of a well established stoma site. Herein we present a case series of 3 patients with mature gastrocutaneous tracks, who developed peritonitis following tube replacement. In the absence of a consensus or international guidelines regarding the management of patients requiring percoutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube replacement, emphasis should be given on prevention of severe adverse events and on early anticipation of their occurrence. Clinical experience indicates that recognition of high-risk procedures, selection of the appropriate replacement method and confirmation of correct tube placement can improve patients' safety and reduce the complications rate.

Confirmation of correct tracheal tube placement in newborn infants

Tracheal intubation remains a common procedure during neonatal intensive care. Rapid confirmation of correct tube placement is important because tube malposition is associated with serious adverse outcomes. The current gold standard test to confirm tube position is a chest radiograph, however this is often delayed until after ventilation has commenced. Hence, point of care methods to confirm correct tube placement have been developed. The aim of this article is to review the available literature on tube placement in newborn infants. We reviewed books, resuscitation manuals and articles from 1830 to the present with the search terms “Infant, Newborn”, “Endotracheal intubation”, “Resuscitation”, “Clinical signs”, “Radiography”, “Respiratory Function Tests”, “Laryngoscopy”, “Ultrasonography”, and “Bronchoscopy”. Various techniques have been studied to help clinicians assess tube placement. However, despite 85 years of clinical practice, the search for higher success rates and quicker intubation continues. Currently, chest radiography remains the gold standard test to confirm tube position. However, rigorous evaluation of new techniques is required to ensure the safety of newborn infants.

Video Review

Video Review

Confirming tracheal intubation - a simple manoeuvre.

A simple technique is described for confirming oral tracheal intubation carried out under direct laryngoscopy. With the laryngoscope blade still in the mouth following intubation, posterior displacement of the tracheal tube towards the palate will usually bring the tube and vocal cords into direct view, providing confirmation of correct tube placement. In 50 consecutive oral tracheal intubations, the tube was seen to pass between the vocal cords in 29 cases, confirming correct tube placement. In the remaining 21 cases, the larynx was obscured during intubation. Posterior displacement of the tube confirmed correct placement in all 21 cases.