Condylar Guidance Values Research Articles

The Effect of Average Value Mounting and Facebow Transfer on Condylar Guidance Settings in a Semi-Adjustable Articulator - A Comparative Study using Digital Lateral Cephalographs in Edentulous Patients.

While we attempt to restore occlusion in completely edentulous patients there is a consensus among clinicians to articulate the cast using average value and avoid performing facebow transfer. Various studies question the application of facebow transfer in the fabrication of removable complete denture fabrication. This study was therefore aimed to study the effect on condylar guidance with casts mounted by the facebow method, Bonwill's method, and radiographic method. A cross-sectional study was performed using casts of edentulous patients attending the Department of Prosthodontics. After establishing a tentative jaw relationship using wax occlusal rims in the edentulous participants, the casts were mounted by Bonwill's method and the facebow transfer method to a semi-adjustable articulator. Protrusive records of the subjects were used to program the articulator to obtain the condylar guidance values. Digital lateral cephalographs were made both in centric and protrusive jaw relationships. The mandibular condyles were then traced and overlapped to obtain radiographic values. The condylar guidance values obtained by Bonwill's method, facebow method and radiographic method were compared using Wilcoxon's signed rank test and Mann-Whitney U test. The SPSS Statistics for Windows (Version 21.0. Armonk, NY, USA:IBM Corp.), and, at a probability value of 0.05, the significance of every statistical test was predetermined. Ten edentulous 45-70 year olds participated in the study. The mean discrepancy between radiography and facebow methods was 12.8° for the right side and 12.7° for the left (P < 0.005). The difference between radiography and Bonwill's methods was significant (P < 0.005), with a mean difference of 34.3° for the right side and 34.7° for the left side. The difference between Bonwill's method and the facebow method was significant (P < 0.005), with a mean difference of 21.5° for the right side and 22° for the left side. The condylar guidance values obtained by clinical methods (Bonwill's and Facebow) were significantly lesser (P < 0.005) compared to the values obtained by radiographic method.

Clinical evaluation of three different anterior reference points on protrusive condylar guidance angle using a semi adjustable articulator and lateral cephalogram

Background: Studies had shown that different anterior reference points can mount the maxillary cast in variable position in the articulator which may affect the protrusive condylar guidance angle on setting the semi adjustable articulator. So there is a need for search of reliable anterior reference point in orienting the maxillary cast on the articulation for accurate prosthesis fabrication. Aim: The aim of this study was to determine the effect of 3 different anterior reference points Orbitale, Orbitale minus 7mm, 36mm from the incisal edge of maxillary central or lateral incisor on the protrusive condylar guidance values registered on Hanau wide vue articulator and compare it to the protrusive condylar guidance angle obtained from lateral Cephalometric tracings. Materials and methods: A total of 30 healthy human subjects were randomly selected for this study from volunteer dental students. Orbitale, Orbitale minus 7mm, 36mm from the maxillary incisal edge of the subjects were the three anterior reference points used for facebow transfer using Hanau springbow. With the help of protrusive records, articulation was done in Hanau wide vue articulator using this record and condylar inclination values were noted on right side and left side.Three sets of lateral cephalometric radiographs were taken in maximum intercuspation and protrusive position, traced manually and values tabulated for all 30 subjects. Results: Mean value of orbitale is highest and mean value of 36mm from the maxillary incisal edge is lowest. Conclusion: Orbitale can be used as a reliable anterior reference point in facebow transfer using hanau wide vue articulator.

A clinical comparison of sagittal condylar inclination and Bennett angle derived from a conventional electronic tracking device and an optical jaw tracking device

The challenges of conventional methods to measure the sagittal condylar inclination and the Bennett angle include patient discomfort and an output of averaged values calculated on the arc of mandibular movement. Programming these average values into a mechanical or mathematically simulated articulator may introduce occlusal errors. The purpose of this clinical study was to compare the sagittal condylar inclination and Bennett angle measurements derived from a conventional electronic tracking device and an optical tracking device. Fifteen dentate participants with at least 12 occluding units, 25 years old and above, participated in the study. Each participant's mandibular movements were recorded by the 2 systems for different condylar guidance values. A conventional tracking device, the Cadiax Compact 2, and an optical tracking device, the MODJAW, were used for this study. Sagittal condylar inclination was measured at 3mm and 5mm using protrusive records and the values of the Bennett angle at 3mm were measured using excursive records along the path traced by mandibular condyles. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to analyze the paired data from the 2 methods. A significant difference was found between right (P=.007) and left sagittal condylar inclinations (P=.010) measured at 3mm with the conventional and optical tracking devices. A significant difference was found between right (P=.015) and left sagittal condylar inclinations (P=.004) measured at 5mm with the conventional and optical tracking devices. The right and left Bennett angles measured at 3mm with the conventional and optical tracking devices were statistically different (P=.043 and P=.035 respectively). The sagittal condylar inclination and Bennett angle measured at different positions along the path of movement exhibited significant differences. The sagittal condylar inclination and Bennett angle values obtained from the conventional tracking device were generally significantly less than those derived from the optical tracking device.

Comparison of accuracy of protrusive condylar guidance registration by two interocclusal recording materials in edentulous patients.

During complete denture fabrication making Interocclusal records plays an integral role to obtain the condylar guidance value. The study was conducted to compare the protrusive condylar guidance registration by two interocclusal recording materials-Quick setting plaster and Luxabite®(bisacrylic composite) in semi adjustable articulator for completely edentulous patients. Maxillary and Mandibular casts of the completely edentulous patients were mounted in Hanau®Wide Vue articulator. The Quick setting plaster and Luxabite®(bisacrylic composite) was used as interocclusal recording materials to program the protrusive condylar guidance angles in the articulators. The protrusive condylar guidance values registered in the articulator for the different interocclusal records were tabulated and statistically analyzed.. The mean protrusive condylar guidance values registered in the articulator was compared with two parameters obtained from the radiographic tracings -- the protrusive condylar path angle obtained with Quick setting plaster and Luxabite with the inclination of articular eminence to the Frankfort horizontal plane. From the study it was concluded that the Luxabite®(bisacrylic composite) material demonstrated better reproducibility of protrusive condylar guidance registration.than the Quick setting plaster.

Comparison of Condylar Inclination Attained by Interocclusal Records, Graphic Tracer and Arcus Digma II and Their Effect on Bilateral Balanced Occlusion

Purpose: Was to compare between the interocclusal record for protrusive movement, the tracing method and the electronic face bow (Arcus Digma) for recording horizontal condylar guidance and their effects on bilateral balanced occlusion. Material and methods: Ten completely edentulous patients with an average age of 55 years old participated in this study. Each patient received upper and lower complete denture, artificial teeth were arranged according to balanced occlusion concept. The horizontal condylar angle was recorded during patient mandibular protrusion of 6mm using the following techniques; interocclusal record, tracer (quick set analyzer) and electronic face bow (Arcus Digma II). Results: The horizontal condylar guidance values of both right and left sides obtained from interocclusal record for protrusive movement, tracing method as well as electronic face bow (Arcus Digma II) showed no statistically significant differences (P>0.05) using ANOVA test (at 95% confidence interval). Arcus Digma II method recorded the centric relation at a more posterior position than other methods, However, it could not make any difference in clinical performance of the complete denture. Horizontal condylar guidance angle was approximately similar by the three techniques. Conclusion: Arcus Digma II seemed a reliable and promising method to be used in recording patient’s horizontal condylar angle as an alternative to the interocclusal and tracer methods.

Comparative Analysis of Condylar Guidance Angle Obtained by Protrusive Interocclusal Records and Radiographic Methods in Edentulous Patients: An In Vivo Study

Abstract Purpose To compare between values of condylar inclination obtained by protrusive interocclusal records using extraoral Gothic arch tracing with cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan, and cephalometric and panoramic radiographs in edentulous patients. Materials and Methods Horizontal condylar guidance angle (HCGA) was measured using the extraoral Gothic arch tracing, CBCT, lateral cephalogram, and orthopantomogram (OPG) in 20 patients aged between 40 and 75 years. HCGAs were determined clinically using protrusive interocclusal records and semi-adjustable articulator after extraoral Gothic arch tracing. Radiographically, Frankfort horizontal plane was marked and a straight line joining the superior-most point and the inferior-most point of posterior slope of the articular eminence (AE) was drawn till the two lines met at an intersection. The angle at this intersection depicted the AE inclination and the angle was measured. Statistical analysis was done using analysis of variance test, multiple comparison was done using Tukey test, and the Pearson correlation coefficient was compiled for different study parameters. Result A significant difference in condylar guidance was observed among different methods (p-value &lt; 0.05), and significant positive correlations were observed among condylar guidance measured using distinct parameters. Conclusion It was concluded that horizontal condylar guidance (HCG) values with the radiographic technique were higher than the clinical method. It was observed that mean HCG values were higher by 6.4 degrees in CBCT, 6.7 degrees in OPG, and 9.9 degrees in lateral cephalogram as compared with the clinical value. It was also observed that there was a variation of condylar guidance up to 5 degrees between right and left sides.

Evaluation of Sagittal Inclination of Occlusal Plane and Horizontal Condylar Guidance Using Various Anterior Reference Points on Arcon and Nonarcon Articulators.

Aim:The aim of the study was to determine the effect of different anterior reference points during facebow transfer, on sagittal inclination of occlusal plane (SIOP) and horizontal condylar guidance (HCG) values obtained on arcon and nonarcon articulators.Materials and Methods:Facebow records of 25 participants were made and transferred to Hanau Wide-Vue (WV) and Hanau H2 (H2) articulators using conventional indirect transfer (CIT), superior annular groove (SAG), and inferior annular groove (IAG) as anterior reference points. Maxillary casts were mounted on each articulator followed by mandibular mountings. Protrusive interocclusal record was used to determine HCG, and SIOP was measured as an angle between the occlusal plane of mounted maxillary cast and upper member of the articulator. Both, HCG and SIOP were measured on a digital lateral cephalogram and the values obtained were compared with previously determined values from both the articulators. Intergroup comparison was done by analysis of variance and pair-wise comparison by Tukey post hoc test.Results:Values of SIOP significantly (P = 0.00) changed on both the articulators when CIT, SAG, and IAG were the anterior reference points. The ratio of SIOP and HCG on both articulators was comparable to that of the cephalogram for CIT, IAG, but it was substantially low for SAG.Conclusions:The variation of anterior reference point changes the value of SIOP recorded on Hanau WV and H2 articulators; however, it had no effect on HCG values recorded on both the articulators. The angle between SIOP and HCG changed with variations in superior-inferior position of the mountings on both articulators.

A comparative study on the influence of third point of reference on condylar guidance settings in a semi-adjustable articulator with lateral cephalographs: An in-vivo study.

The study aimed to evaluate the effect on condylar guidance values with casts mounted by facebow transfer (Guichet's point as the third point of reference), Bonwill's, and radiographic method. The dentulous subject's casts were mounted to a semi-adjustable articulator (Artex Type AR) after facebow transfer with Guichet's point as the third point of reference and also by Bonwill's method. Protrusive records made earlier were utilized to program the right and left side condylar guidance value. Two digital lateral cephalograms were made, one in centric relation, and one in protrusion and the condyles were traced and overlapped. The condylar guidance readings obtained by Bonwill's method, facebow transfer, and lateral cephalometric tracings were compared in this study using the SPSS (Version 17.0 Illinois, Chicago, USA) software. The condylar guidance values obtained from Bonwill's and the facebow transfer method (p < 0.001) was lesser than the radiographic method. The values obtained by casts mounted to the Bonwill's method differed significantly (p < 0.001) from the other two methods. The values obtained by facebow transfer were closer to the radiographic values whereas the values obtained by Bonwill's method mounting differed markedly.

Assessment of Sagittal Condylar Guidance with Protrusive Inter-occlusal Method, Panoramic Radiographs, and Lateral Cephalogram: A Comparative Study

Condylar guidance can be determined using the clinical and radiographic methods. The present study was conducted to determine condylar guidance using the protrusive interocclusal wax method, panoramic radiographs, and lateral cephalogram. The aim of the study was to compare the correlation between sagittal condylar guidance with protrusive interocclusal method, panoramic radiographs, and lateral cephalogram. The present study was conducted on 82 dentulous subjects (males 41, females 41). In all subjects, interocclusal registration values and condylar guidance values were measured using panoramic radiographs and lateral cephalograms. The mean ± SD protrusive interocclusal registration value on the left side was 34.01 ± 1.2 mm and 34.08 ± 1.4 mm on the right side. The panoramic radiographs showed 35.12 ± 1.6 mm on the left side and 35.16 ± 1.7 mm on the right side. The mean ± SD protrusive interocclusal registration values on the left side was 34.01 ± 1.2 mm on the left side and 34.08 ± 1.4 mm on the right side. Lateral cephalogram showed 34.35 ± 1.3 mm on the left side and 34.67 ± 1.6 mm on the right side. There was a significant difference between the methods (p < 0.05). Sagittal condylar guidance can be evaluated using protrusive interocclusal method. Along with it, other methods such as panoramic radiographs and lateral cephalogram may also be used for recording condylar guidance. Lateral cephalogram and panoramic radiographs may be reliable in determining condylar guidance, which can be used in orthodontic treatment planning.

Axiograph and the Panoramic Radiographic Imaging Technique, an Alternative to Conventional Technique to Record Condylar Guidance

Introduction: The documentation of the maxillomandibular relationship and the recording values of condylar guidance is the most critical, yet essential step in fabrication of complete denture prosthesis and it also helps in diagnosing, treatment planning, and fabrication of the balanced complete denture prosthesis that aids in enhancing the aesthetics, and maintenance of the stomatognathic system. Various techniques are available to record the condylar guidance; One of them being axiographic technique and panoramic radiograph followed by programming the semi adjustable articulators. Aim: The aim of the present study was to evaluate and compare the condylar guidance using the conventional technique the gothic arch tracing with that of axiographic technique and the panoramic radiographs. Materials and Methods: The observational study with the clinical set up was carried out over a period between October 2018- March 2019. Twenty completely edentulous patients were selected for the study. The comparative evaluation of axiographic tracing technique, panoramic radiographic technique and the extraoral gothic arch tracing technique was conducted. The horizontal condylar guidance values obtained with these techniques were assessed. The data obtained was statistically analysed using Karl Pearson correlation test to determine the correlation between the values obtained from all the three techniques on the right side and the left side of the subjects. Paired t-test and Bonferroni Post-Hoc test were used to compare the extraoral gothic arch tracing values and Orthopantomogram values and axiographic tracing values on right side and left side of the subjects. Results: A statistically significant correlation was observed between the extraoral Gothic arch tracing technique and the panoramic radiographic technique on right (r=0.047, p-value 0.04) and left sides (r=0.55, p-value 0.01) of the subjects. The axiographic tracing showed lower values when compared with gothic arch tracing technique and the panoramic radiographic technique. (95%CI of difference was -0.49 lower). Significant differences were obtained on comparison between all three techniques on right (p-value&lt;0.001) and left sides.(p-value 0.008). On pairwise comparison of right sides between Extraoral gothic arch Tracing and Axiographic tracing (p-value&lt;0.001) and between axiographic tracing and Orthopantomographic tracing (p-value&lt;0.001), were significant, while pairwise comparison on left side between Orthopantomogram and Axiographic tracings (p-value 0.01) was significant. Conclusion: The panoramic radiographic images can be used as an alternative method to that of conventional gothic arch tracing technique to obtain the condylar guidance values. The values obtained using axiographic tracings method was comparatively lower. Thus, the values obtained from axiographic technique should be used with caution or the values needs to be compared to gold standard techniques to further analyse the accuracy of the values that can be used as a valuable aid in setting the condylar guidance in semi-adjustable articulators.

Comparative evaluation of condylar guidance obtained by three different interocclusal recording materials in a semi-adjustable articulator and digital panoramic radiographic images in dentate patients: An in vivo study.

Aim:The Aim of the study was to evaluate the reproducibility of condylar inclination values obtained using three different interocclusal recording materials in Hanau Wide-Vue semi-adjustable articulator and to compare those values of condylar inclination with panoramic radiographic images.Settings and Design:In Vivo Comparative study.Materials and Methods:The clinical trial was carried out in the Department of Prosthodontics, M. R Ambedkar Dental College and Hospital, Bengaluru. A total of 30 dentulous subjects aged between 20 and 40 years were selected, without any signs and symptoms of temporomandibular joint disorders. With the help of a custom-made protrusive guide, protrusive records for three materials were made. These records were used for programming the articulator and the respective horizontal condylar inclination (HCI) value, and panoramic radiographs were made. The values obtained were statistically analyzed.Statistical Analysis Used:Independent t-test, multiple comparisons using Bonferroni method followed by Analysis of variances (ANOVA) were used.Results:Among each pair of groups there exists a significant difference, i.e., the mean condylar inclination (degree) was found to be statistically significant between wax and polyvinyl siloxane (P < 0.01) as well as between wax and polyether (P < 0.01). No significant difference was observed between polyvinyl siloxane and polyether (P > 0.05).Conclusion:HCI values differed depending on the type of material employed. The study concluded that the protrusive condylar guidance angles obtained by panoramic radiograph can be used in programming the semi-adjustable articulator and among the materials polyether gave the highest Condylar Guidance values with less variability and wax gave lowest values with greater variation.

Comparative evaluation of sagittal condylar guidance obtained from a clinical method and with cone beam computed tomography in dentate individuals

Statement of problemProgramming semiadjustable and fully adjustable articulators involves time-consuming clinical steps which can be avoided if an accurate radiographic method can accurately determine the condylar guidance angles. PurposeThe purpose of this clinical study was to compare the sagittal condylar guidance in dentate individuals as determined by a clinical method, protrusive interocclusal record, and a radiographic method, cone beam computed tomography. If the methods show a correlation, then cone beam computed tomography can be used as a time-saving method of programming an articulator for patients requiring a cone beam computed tomography scan. Material and methodsA total of 40 participants (20 men and 20 women) within the 20 to 40 years age group were enrolled according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Cone beam computed tomography scans were obtained, and by using an appropriate software program, the sagittal condylar guidance was measured for both sides. A protrusive interocclusal record was obtained by using polyvinyl siloxane material. The maxillary cast of each participant was mounted on a semiadjustable articulator with a facebow transfer, and the mandibular cast was mounted with a maximum intercuspal record. The protrusive record was then transferred to the articulator for programming. ResultsThe right and left sagittal condylar guidance values obtained from both the protrusive interocclusal record and cone beam computed tomography method were comparable, with no significant differences (P>.05). The difference in condylar inclination values for both sexes obtained from both methods for both sides were not statistically different (P>.05). With increasing age, condylar inclination values obtained from both methods tended to decrease. The values for sagittal condylar guidance obtained from both methods (protrusive interocclusal record and cone beam computed tomography) were comparable and correlated. ConclusionsCone beam computed tomography measurement involves stable bony landmarks and can be standardized, whereas clinical methods are time consuming and can provide inaccurate results because of the instability of the materials used to register the maxillomandibular relationship. Thus, cone beam computed tomography can be used to obtain the sagittal horizontal guidance for programming semiadjustable and fully adjustable articulators for patients requiring a cone beam computed tomography scan.

Comparison of Sagittal Condylar Guidance Determined by Panoramic Radiographs to the One Determined by Conventional Methods Using Lateral Interocclusal Records in the Saudi Arabian Population.

Objectives:The objectives of this study were to determine the condylar guidance by the conventional method using interocclusal records and by panoramic radiographs in healthy dentate patients and to compare the values obtained from panoramic radiographs with the values obtained by a conventional method.Materials and Methods:Thirty healthy dentulous subjects of either sex with an age range of 20–40 years visiting Jazan University, College of Dentistry, Dental Clinics for replacement of missing teeth or crowns, were selected according to the inclusion criteria. Maxillary and mandibular casts were obtained and mounted on Whipmix 2240 articulator. Right and left lateral interocclusal records were then made in patients by base plate wax (Dentsply truwax baseplate). This record was transferred to articulator, and condylar values were determined. In all the cases, articulator was programmed. Left and right condylar values were also measured on digital radiographs and readings were recorded. Condylar guidance readings obtained from interocclusal records and those obtained from panoramic radiographic images were compared and analyzed statistically using the t-test.Results:The condylar guidance values obtained from the interocclusal record method for both left and right sides were less when compared to the values obtained from tracing the panoramic radiographs (radiographic method). The difference in values of both the methods was highly significant.Conclusion:Although a significant amount of correlation was found between the two methods, better radiographic techniques should be further investigated.

Comparative analysis of sagittal condylar guidance by protrusive interocclusal records with panoramic and lateral cephalogram radiographs in dentulous population: A clinico-radiographic study.

Aim:To evaluate and compare the correlation between sagittal condylar guidance obtained by protrusive interocclusal records mounted on semi-adjustable articulator with panoramic and Lateral cephalogram radiograph tracings in dentulous population.Materials and Methods:One-hundred twenty dentulous subjects between age group of 20–40 years, free of signs and symptoms of any temporomandibular diseases were selected. The sagittal condylar guidance was determined by protrusive interocclusal records and transferred to a semi-adjustable articulator through a face bow. The condylar guidance angles obtained were tabulated. The sagittal outline of the articular eminence and glenoid fossa were traced on panoramic and lateral cephalogram radiographs. The sagittal condylar path inclination was constructed. This was related to the Frankfurt's horizontal plane on radiograph to determine the radiographic angle of sagittal condylar guidance. The comparison of protrusive interocclusal records was done with the angles obtained by panoramic and lateral cephalogram radiograph tracings.Results:The mean difference between the condylar guidance values obtained using panoramic and lateral cephalogram radiographs was 0.13° and 0.67° on right side and 1.0° and 1.54° on left side with the radiographic values being higher. A Significant positive correlation was observed with P values 0.001 and 0.005 in left and right respectively.Conclusion:This study highlighted on the correlation between protrusive interocclusal records and the lateral cephalogram radiograph tracings which were more positively related than the panoramic radiograph. The values of lateral cephalogram radiograph tracings are closer as separate radiographs for left and right side were taken, causing the amount and quality of image distortion less. Lateral cephalogram radiograph may be taken as an important tool to rely on for recording the Sagittal condylar guidance angle.

An in vivo study to compare and correlate sagittal condylar guidance obtained by radiographic and extraoral gothic arch tracing method in edentulous patients

Purpose: To compare the sagittal condylar guidance angle obtained by extra oral gothic arch tracing and orthopantomogram in completely edentulous subjects. Material and Methods: Ten completely edentulous subjects were selected by the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Conventional steps in the fabrication of complete denture with balanced occlusion were carried out. Extra oral gothic arch tracing records were obtained for every patient. Protrusive interocclusal records were used to program the Hanau wide vue semiadjustable articulator, thus obtaining the sagittal condylar guidance angle by clinical method. On the orthopantomogram obtained for every patient in the study, orbitale and porion were located and the Frankfurts horizontal reference line was drawn. The most superior and the inferior points on the glenoid fossa curvature were located and a mean curvature line was obtained. A third reference line passing through the most superior and the inferior points on the glenoid fossa was extended to intersect the Frankfurts horizontal plane, thus obtaining the radiographic sagittal condylar guidance. These values were tabulated and subjected to Wilcoxon Signed Ranks test. Results: There is statistically significant difference between the sagittal condylar guidance values obtained between right and left sides with extra oral gothic arch tracing and orthopantomographic method (p value is 0.014 and 0.007 respectively). Conclusions: The use of orthopantomogram to set the condylar guidance on the semi adjustable articulator for complete denture therapy is questionable.

A Comparative Study of Condylar Guidance Setting Obtained From Interocclusal Records and Panoramic Radiographs in Both Dentulous and Edentulous Subjects

AbstractTo compare the condylar guidance values obtained from interocclusal records and the panoramic radiographs in both dentulous and edentulous subjects. Materials &amp; methods: 20 dentulous and 20 edentulous subjects having specific criteria were selected for the cross-sectional descriptive in-vivo study. In the first method, the sagittal condylar guidance values for both the groups were recorded after obtaining protrusive records using HANAU articulator model Wide-Vue, U.S.A. In the second method panoramic radiographs were made of all the edentulous and dentulous subjects in the natural head position and tracings were done of the outline of glenoid fossa and the articular eminence. The angles formed by the lines drawn were measured and the values obtained were compared with those from the inter-occlusal record method. The condylar guidance readings of both dentulous and edentulous subjects obtained from the interocclusal records and those by tracing panoramic radiographic images were compared by Mann Whitney U test and Karl Pearson’s coefficient of correlation test. Results: The condylar guidance values obtained from the interocclusal records were less when compared to the values obtained from tracing the panoramic radiographs. Significant correlation (r=0.9) between the condylar guidance values obtained for left and right sides in interocclusal record group and a moderate correlation (r=0.65) between the condylar guidance values obtained for left and right sides from panoramic radiographs. Conclusion: The results from this study showed that measurement of condylar inclination angles using panoramic radiographs gave higher values, as compared to the inter-occlusal record method. Also, panoramic radiographic method revealed less difference between the condylar guidance values obtained for left and right sides as compared to the articulator method. Although, significant amount of correlation was found between the two methods, variations due to different operators and better radiographic techniques should be further investigated.

Evaluation of Hanau's formula in determination of lateral condylar guidance: A clinical research study.

Statement of Problem:The accuracy and reliability of the methods used for programming the semi-adjustable articulators determine the accuracy in occlusion. The current recommended average settings using the Hanau's formula commonly used by clinicians is questionable, and thus reassessment is needed. This study was carried out to evaluate and compare the lateral condylar guidance: (1) Using the Hanau's formula and the computerized jaw tracking device (Kinesiograph). (2) On the right and left sides using both these methods.Materials and Methods:A total of 20 completely edentulous patients (14 male and 6 females) within 40–60 years of age were selected. Jaw relation was recorded followed by face bow transfer. Extraoral Gothic arch tracing was recorded; three protrusive records were obtained and condylar guidance was calculated. Lateral condylar guidance was then calculated using Hanau's formula, followed by the computerized jaw tracking device. A comparative evaluation was done of the obtained values. The same investigator worked with each of the study participants for the purpose of standardization.Results:The lateral condylar guidance values obtained using the Hanau's formula ranged from 14 to 17° while those obtained using the computerized K7 jaw tracking device ranged from 8 to 40°. Bennett angle values, obtained using the jaw tracking device and Hanau's formula showed statistically significant differences (P < 0.05) using paired t-test (at 95% confidence interval). Bennett angle values of the right and left sides found using the Hanau's formula were almost similar. Difference in the Bennett angle values of the right and left sides were found using the jaw tracking device. However, this difference was not statistically significant (P > 0.05).Conclusion:Based on the results, dentist and dental technicians should consider reassessing the current recommended average settings and use of the Hanau's formula for programming the semi-adjustable articulators.

A Comparative Evaluation to Measure the Sagittal Condylar Guidance Values between the Semiadjustable Articulators and Radiographic Images

A Comparative Evaluation to Measure the Sagittal Condylar Guidance Values between the Semiadjustable Articulators and Radiographic Images

Effect of direct and indirect face-bow transfer on the horizontal condylar guidance values: A pilot study

Aims and Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of direct and indirect face-bow transfer on the horizontal condylar guidance (HCG) values obtained on the semi-adjustable articulator. Materials and Methods: A total of 15 subjects of age 20-30 years, of either sex were selected. Two sets of maxillary and mandibular casts were obtained. A single arbitrary face-bow record was used for mounting the maxillary casts by direct and indirect transfer for each subject. The mandibular casts were mounted using maximum intercuspation record. Protrusive records were made in Alu wax and used to program the directly and indirectly transferred casts. HCG values obtained from cephalometric records were taken as control. The data was subjected to ANOVA and Bonferroni post hoc test. Results: Mean values of HCG obtained in direct face-bow transfer were 24.93°, indirect transfer −27.66°, and cephalometric analysis −32.73°. One-way ANOVA test indicated that there was a significant difference between all the groups (P < 0.05). Tukey's test with Bonferroni's correction (P < 0.01) was significant for direct and indirect transfer (P = 0.008), and direct transfer and cephalometric readings (P = 0.0046). A nonsignificant difference was found between indirect transfer and cephalometric readings (P = 0.047). Conclusion : There is a statistically significant difference in HCG values obtained from direct and indirect face-bow transfer records. Lateral cephalograms gave higher mean HCG values than those obtained from protrusive records. Mean HCG values obtained from indirect face-bow transfers are significantly more than those obtained from direct transfers and are also closer to the values obtained from the lateral cephalograms.

A Comparative Evaluation of Condylar Guidance Value from Radiograph with Interocclusal Records made During Jaw Relation and Try-in: A Pilot Study.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reliability of programming the articulator using the radiographs and the interocclusal records made during Jaw relation (Arrow point tracing) and Try-in stage. The study comprised of 15 edentulous subjects with well formed maxillary and mandibular ridges, with no signs and symptoms of temporomandibular joint disorders and neuromuscular disorders. Digital Orthopantomograph was taken for all the subjects. The condylar guidance angles were traced on Orthopantomograph for right and left sides and the values were recorded. The protrusive interocclusal records were made at jaw relation stage and at try-in stage using bite registration paste (Bitrex- vinyl polysiloxane) for all subjects. These interocclusal records were used to programme the Semi-adjustable articulator (Hanau Wide Vue) and the condylar guidance values on the right and left sides were recorded. The condylar guidance values so obtained were compared with the values obtained by Orthopantomograph. The condylar guidance values obtained by the various procedures were subjected to statistical analysis. The results showed statistically significant difference between the condylar guidance values obtained from Orthopantomograph (Radiograph) and the condylar guidance values obtained at the stage of jaw relation and also between Orthopantomograph and condylar guidance values obtained at the stage of Try-in. Condylar guidance values obtained from the Radiographs were higher than those obtained at the stage of Jaw relation and at the stage of Try-in. However, we notice that the mean condylar guidance values obtained at the stage of Try-in were nearer to the mean condylar guidance values obtained on the Radiographs.