Conditioned Rewarding Effects Of Morphine Research Articles

Morphine-induced conditioned place preference and effects of morphine pre-exposure in adolescent and adult male C57BL/6J mice.

Given the increasing abuse of prescription opioids, particularly in adolescents, surprisingly few preclinical studies have explored effects of opioids in adolescents (versus adults). This study compared the conditioned rewarding effects of morphine, without (experiment 1) and with morphine pre-exposure (experiment 2), in adolescent and adult male mice. Experiment 1: On each of three consecutive days, one of the two conditioning sessions was preceded by an injection of a particular dose of morphine (0.1, 0.32, 1, 3.2, 10, 32, or 100mg/kg, intraperitoneal) and the other by saline; place preference was tested on day 4. Experiment 2: Mice received once daily injections of saline or a particular dose of morphine (17.8 or 56mg/kg) for 4days, and 3days later, place conditioning with morphine (0.32, 1, 3.2, or 10mg/kg) began. In both experiments, morphine induced conditioned place preference along similar inverted U-shaped dose-response curves in adolescent and adult mice, with maximal effects between 0.32 and 10mg/kg. Morphine pre-exposure did not sensitize morphine-induced conditioned place preference; instead, tolerance occurred, but only in adults. Adolescents were more sensitive than adults to morphine-induced locomotor stimulation. Response to novelty predicted the locomotor stimulating effects of morphine in adolescents, but not its rewarding effects. The rewarding effects of morphine were similar in adolescent and adult mice but showed differential tolerance after morphine pre-exposure. Adolescents were more sensitive than adults to the acute locomotor stimulating effects of morphine, consistent with dopamine systems involved in locomotor activity being overactive during adolescence.

Conditioned rewarding effects of morphine and methadone in mice pre-exposed to cocaine

BackgroundMethadone is widely accepted as the most effective treatment of opioid dependence. However, clinical observations indicate that the medication is less effective in individuals abusing cocaine. Diminished therapeutic efficacy of methadone in cocaine users is intriguing, but its mechanism has not been studied. MethodsHere, the conditioned place preference (CPP) procedure was used to examine the effects of the dose, number of conditioning sessions and pre-exposure to cocaine on the rewarding effects of morphine and methadone. Vehicle-pre-exposed and cocainesensitized mice (five injections of 10mg/kg over 16 days) were conditioned using methadone (0, 0.1, 0.5, 3, and 5mg/kg) or morphine (0, 1, and 10mg/kg). Place preference was measured after one and again after two additional conditioning sessions. ResultsAs expected, morphine at 10mg/kg produced CPP following just one conditioning session. While a single conditioning session with 1mg/kg of morphine produced no CPP, the rewarding effect became apparent following two additional conditioning sessions as well as in mice pre-exposed to cocaine. Methadone produced CPP following one conditioning session at doses of 0.5, 3 and 5mg/kg. However, unlike with morphine, methadone's rewarding effect was not enhanced by two additional conditioning sessions or by pre-exposure with cocaine. ConclusionsPrior exposure to cocaine increases unconditioned motivational effects of morphine but not of methadone.

Effects of CNQX and MPEP on sensitization to the rewarding effects of morphine

The present study was conducted to evaluate the influence of the glutamatergic receptors α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA) and metabotropic glutamate 5 (mGlu5) receptors on sensitization to the rewarding effects of morphine. The effects of pre-treatment with saline or 20mg/kg morphine plus the AMPA receptor antagonist 6-cyano-7-nitroquinoxaline-2,3-dione (CNQX) (5 or 10mg/kg) or the metabotropic Glu5 receptor antagonist 6-methyl-2-(phenylethynyl)-pyridine (MPEP) (5 or 10mg/kg) on the place conditioning induced by a low dose of morphine (2mg/kg) were assessed. The 2mg/kg dose of morphine was ineffective in animals pre-treated with saline but induced a clear conditioned place preference (CPP) in mice pre-treated with morphine alone and morphine plus any of the MPEP doses or the lowest dose of CNQX. Conversely, animals pre-treated with morphine plus 10mg/kg of CNQX did not acquire CPP. Our results suggest that AMPA glutamate receptors are involved in the development of sensitization to the conditioned rewarding effects of morphine.

Involvement of nitric oxide synthesis in sensitization to the rewarding effects of morphine

Knowledge about the specific brain changes and neural plasticity processes produced by repeated exposure to a drug is essential to progress in the field of neurobiology of addiction and the development of effective medication. In the present study, the influence of nitric oxide synthesis on sensitization to the rewarding effects of morphine has been evaluated. The effects of pre-treatment of mice with saline or 20 mg/kg of morphine plus the nitric oxide synthase inhibitor 7-nitroindazole (7NI) (12.5 or 25 mg/kg) on the place conditioning induced by a low dose of morphine (2 mg/kg) were assessed. The dose of 2 mg/kg of morphine was ineffective in animals pre-treated with saline but induced a clear conditioned place preference (CPP) in those pre-treated with morphine. Conversely, animals pre-treated with morphine plus 7NI did not acquire CPP. Our results demonstrate that the nitric oxide pathway is implicated in the development of sensitization to the conditioned rewarding effects of morphine.

Memantine blocks sensitization to the rewarding effects of morphine

Knowledge regarding the specific brain changes and neural plasticity processes produced by repeated drug exposure may be used to advance the understanding of the neurobiology of addiction in order to design appropriate medications. In the present study, the influence of N-methyl- d-aspartate (NMDA) glutamatergic receptors on sensitization to the motor and rewarding effects of morphine was evaluated. The effects of pre-exposure to saline or 20 mg/kg morphine plus the NMDA receptor antagonist memantine (10 or 20 mg/kg) on motor activity and place conditioning induced by a low dose of morphine (2 mg/kg) were assessed. The dose of 2 mg/kg of morphine was ineffective in mice pre-exposed to saline but induced a clear conditioned place preference (CPP) in those pre-exposed to morphine. Conversely, animals pre-exposed to morphine plus memantine did not acquire CPP. Only those pre-exposed to morphine presented an increased motor response to morphine 2 mg/kg. Our results demonstrate that NMDA glutamatergic receptors are implicated in the development of sensitization to the conditioned rewarding effects of morphine.

Delta-Opioid Receptor Antagonists Prevent Sensitization to the Conditioned Rewarding Effects of Morphine

Functional interactions between mu- and delta-opioid receptors (MOPr and DOPr, respectively) are implicated in morphine tolerance and dependence. The contribution of DOPr to the conditioned rewarding effects of morphine and the enhanced conditioned response that occurs after repeated morphine administration is unknown. This issue was addressed with the conditioned place preference procedure (CPP). Rats received home cage injections of saline or morphine (5.0 mg/kg/day x 5 days) before conditioning. For sensitization studies, DOPr antagonists (DOPr1/2: naltrindole, DOPr2: naltriben, DOPr1: 7-benzylidenenaltrexone) were administered before morphine injections. Conditioning sessions (2 morphine; 2 saline) commenced 3 days later. To assess the influence of acute DOPr blockade on the conditioning of morphine reward in naïve animals, 3 morphine and 3 saline conditioning sessions were employed. Antagonists were administered before morphine conditioning sessions. Morphine was ineffective as a conditioning stimulus after two conditioning sessions in naïve rats. However, doses > or = 3.0 mg/kg produced significant CPP in morphine pre-exposed rats, confirming that sensitization develops to the conditioned rewarding effects of morphine. In animals that received morphine pre-exposure with naltrindole or naltriben but not 7-benzylidenenaltrexone, sensitization was prevented. No attenuation of morphine CPP was observed in animals that received DOPr antagonists acutely, before conditioning sessions. These data indicate a critical role of DOPr systems in mediating sensitization to the conditioned rewarding effects of morphine. The efficacy of naltrindole and naltriben in preventing the enhanced response to morphine suggest the specific involvement of DOPr2 in the sensitization process.

Augmentation of Morphine-Induced Sensitization but Reduction in Morphine Tolerance and Reward in Delta-Opioid Receptor Knockout Mice

Studies in experimental animals have shown that individuals exhibiting enhanced sensitivity to the locomotor-activating and rewarding properties of drugs of abuse are at increased risk for the development of compulsive drug-seeking behavior. The purpose of the present study was to assess the effect of constitutive deletion of delta-opioid receptors (DOPr) on the rewarding properties of morphine as well as on the development of sensitization and tolerance to the locomotor-activating effects of morphine. Locomotor activity testing revealed that mice lacking DOPr exhibit an augmentation of context-dependent sensitization following repeated, alternate injections of morphine (20 mg/kg; s.c.; 5 days). In contrast, the development of tolerance to the locomotor-activating effects of morphine following chronic morphine administration (morphine pellet: 25 mg: 3 days) is reduced relative to WT mice. The conditioned rewarding effects of morphine were reduced significantly in DOPrKO mice as compared to WT controls. Similar findings were obtained in response to pharmacological inactivation of DOPr in WT mice, indicating that observed effects are not due to developmental adaptations that occur as a consequence of constitutive deletion of DOPr. Together, these findings indicate that the endogenous DOPr system is recruited in response to both repeated and chronic morphine administration and that this recruitment serves an essential function in the development of tolerance, behavioral sensitization, and the conditioning of opiate reward. Importantly, they demonstrate that DOPr has a distinct role in the development of each of these drug-induced adaptations. The anti-rewarding and tolerance-reducing properties of DOPr antagonists may offer new opportunities for the treatment and prevention of opioid dependence as well as for the development of effective analgesics with reduced abuse liability.

Behavioral effects of morphine and cocaine in M1 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor-deficient mice

Muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (M1-M5) modulate the activity of the central nervous system and an array of physiological functions. Recent evidence has also implicated muscarinic receptors in behavioral effects of drugs of abuse such as morphine and cocaine. However, the genetic similarity between muscarinic receptors and the coexpression of multiple subtypes in most cells has impeded the development of selective antagonists and the determination of the role of each muscarinic receptor subtype in morphine's and cocaine's behavioral effects. The present studies employ mice deficient in the M1 receptor subtype (M1 KO) to assess morphine antinociception (2.5, 5.0, 10, or 20 mg/kg) and the conditioned rewarding effects of morphine and cocaine (2.5, 5.0, or 10 mg/kg). M1 KO and their wild-type (WT) littermates were tested using a 56 degrees C hotplate assay and a conditioned place preference procedure. Parallel studies using the M1 receptor antagonist, pirenzepine, were also conducted in the background strain C57BL6 mice. The results demonstrate that M1 KO mice display a greater antinociceptive effect of morphine in the hotplate assay; however, the effects of morphine as well as cocaine were attenuated in the conditioned place preference procedure. Comparable results were obtained with the pharmacological antagonism of the M1 receptor by pirenzepine. These results suggest a modulatory role of the M1 muscarinic receptor in opioid antinociception and conditioned drug reward, and demonstrate the utility of M1 receptor knockout models for the determination of the role of the M1 subtype in the behavioral effects of morphine and cocaine.

Sensitization to the conditioned rewarding effects of morphine modulates gene expression in rat hippocampus

Opiates addiction is characterized by its long-term persistence. In order to study the enduring changes in long-term memory in hippocampus, a pivotal region for this process, we used suppression subtractive hybridization to compare hippocampal gene expression in morphine and saline-treated rats. Animals were subjected to an extended place preference paradigm consisting of four conditioning phases. Sensitization to the reinforcing effects of the drug occurred after three conditioning phases. After 25 days of treatment rats were euthanized and the complementary DNA (cDNA) from the hippocampus of morphine-dependent and saline-treated animals were then screened for differentially expressed cDNAs. The selected 177 clones were then subjected to a microarray procedure and 20 clones were found differentially regulated. The pattern of regulated genes suggests impairments in neurotransmitter release and the activation of neuroprotective pathways.

Effect of MS-153, a glutamate transporter activator, on the conditioned rewarding effects of morphine, methamphetamine and cocaine in mice

There is a body of evidence implying the involvement of the glutamatergic system in the conditioned rewarding effects of drugs of abuse. It is recognized that the release of extracellular glutamate from nerve terminals is counterbalanced by the functions of neuronal and glial glutamate transporters. In the present study, we investigated the effects of ( R)-(−)-5-methyl-1-nicotinoyl-2-pyrazoline (MS-153), a glutamate transporter activator, on the induction of the conditioned place preference to morphine, methamphetamine and cocaine in mice. In the conditioned place preference paradigm, mice were conditioned with repeated subcutaneous injections of morphine (5 mg/kg), methamphetamine (2 mg/kg) or cocaine (8 mg/kg) in combination with or without MS-153 (3 and 10 mg/kg). Co-administration of MS-153 at a dose of 10 mg/kg, but not 3 mg/kg, significantly attenuated the induction of conditioned place preference to morphine, methamphetamine and cocaine. However, MS-153 itself produced neither conditioned place preference nor aversion. On the other hand, co-administration of MS-153 (10 mg/kg) did not alter the acute locomotor activation elicited by a single injection of morphine, methamphetamine and cocaine. These results suggest that MS-153, a glutamate transporter activator, has an inhibitory effect on the conditioned rewarding effects of morphine, methamphetamine and cocaine without affecting their acute locomotor responses.

Effects of dopamine antagonists with different receptor blockade profiles on morphine-induced place preference in male mice

The effects of dopamine (DA) antagonists with different selectivity for the DA receptors (SCH 23390, 0.5, 0.25, 0.125 mg/kg; haloperidol, 0.2, 0.1 mg/kg; raclopride, 1.2, 0.6, 0.3 mg/kg; risperidone, 0.4, 0.2, 0.1 mg/kg; U-99194A maleate, 40, 20 mg/kg; clozapine, 2.5, 1.25, 0.625 mg/kg) on the acquisition of place conditioning and morphine-induced conditioned place preference (CPP) were explored in male mice. Morphine (40 mg/kg) produced CPP while SCH 23390, haloperidol and clozapine (highest dose) and risperidone (lowest dose) produced conditioned place aversion (CPA). Raclopride and U-99194A maleate did not produce CPP or CPA. Morphine-induced CPP was reversed by the administration of SCH 23390 and risperidone (all doses), haloperidol (highest dose) and raclopride and clozapine (intermediate and lowest doses). U-99194A maleate did not reverse morphine-induced CPP. These results suggest that the conditioned rewarding effects of morphine are mediated by the different subtypes of DA receptors.

Sensitization to the conditioned rewarding effects of morphine and cocaine: differential effects of the kappa-opioid receptor agonist U69593.

The ability of the kappa-opioid receptor agonist U69593 to attenuate the sensitization and cross-sensitization which develops to the conditioned rewarding effects of morphine and cocaine was examined using an unbiased place-preference conditioning procedure. The influence of U69593 treatment upon sensitization and cross-sensitization to cocaine was also assessed. Doses of morphine (1.0-5.0 mg kg(-1)) which failed to produce a conditioned response in drug-naive rats produced marked preferences for the drug-paired place in animals which had previously received once daily injections of morphine (5.0 mg kg(-1); s.c.) or cocaine (10.0 mg kg(-1); i.p.) for 5 days. Morphine-induced place preferences also occurred in animals which had received morphine in combination with U69593 (0.04-0.32 mg kg(-1); s.c.) on either days 3-5 or 1-5 of the morphine treatment regimen. In contrast, morphine failed to produce significant conditioning in animals which had received U69593 with cocaine for 5 days. Doses of cocaine (1.0-5.0 mg kg(-1)) which did not produce a conditioned response in naive rats produced preferences for the drug-paired place in animals which had received once daily injections of cocaine (10.0 mg kg(-1) day(-1) x 5 days; i.p.) or morphine (5.0 mg kg(-1) day(-1) x 5 days; s.c.). No enhancement of cocaine-induced conditioning occurred in animals which had received U69593 on days 3-5 or on days 1-5 of the five-day cocaine treatment. In animals, however, which had received U69593 with morphine for 5 days, an enhanced response to cocaine was still seen. These findings confirm that sensitization and cross-sensitization develop to the conditioned rewarding effects of cocaine and morphine. They also indicate that the ability of a kappa-opioid receptor agonist to prevent the development of these sensitized responses depends on the sensitizing agent employed. U69593 prevents sensitization and cross-sensitization induced by cocaine, but does not modify morphine-induced sensitization or the cross-sensitization which develops to cocaine after morphine administration.

Sensitization to the conditioned rewarding effects of morphine: pharmacology and temporal characteristics

An unbiased place preference conditioning procedure was used to determine whether the repeated administration of morphine results in sensitization to its conditioned rewarding effects. Rats received once daily injections of saline or morphine (5.0 mg/kg; i.p.) for 5 days in a room distinct from that where conditioning would occur. Place preference conditioning commenced 72 h later. A minimum of three drug conditioning sessions was necessary for the establishment of morphine-induced conditioned place preferences in saline-pretreated rats. The minimum dose producing this effect was 5.0 mg/kg. In animals pre-exposed to morphine, significant place preferences occurred after only two drug conditioning sessions and in response to doses of 3.0 mg/kg and greater. The augmented response to morphine was apparent when conditioning commenced 3, 10 or 21 days after the cessation of morphine pretreatment. It was not apparent when conditioning commenced 1 day after treatment cessation. An enhanced response to morphine was also observed in rats which had previously received either fentanyl (0.016 mg/kg/day) or nicotine (0.4 mg/kg/day) for 5 days. Animals which received morphine or fentanyl in combination with naloxone (0.5 mg/kg; s.c.) for 5 days failed to exhibit a conditioned response to morphine. When, however, naloxone was administered in combination with nicotine, significant morphine-induced place preferences were still seen. These data demonstrate that both sensitization and cross-sensitization develop to the conditioned rewarding effects of morphine. Furthermore, they indicate that the sensitization induced by morphine and fentanyl, but not nicotine, is opioid-receptor mediated.