Conditioned Fear Stress Model Research Articles

Asenapine reduces anxiety-related behaviours in rat conditioned fear stress model.

Asenapine is an atypical antipsychotic that is currently available for the treatment of schizophrenia and bipolar I disorder. Although the atypical antipsychotics clozapine and olanzapine are effective for depression and anxiety in schizophrenia, as demonstrated by animal model studies, this has not been clarified for asenapine. Therefore, we compared the effects of asenapine in the conditioned fear stress model with those of clozapine and olanzapine. Rats were individually fear conditioned using electrical foot shock in a Skinner box. Approximately 24 h later, individual animals were returned to the same Skinner box (without electrical shock) and their freezing behaviour was observed for 5 min. Animals were treated with asenapine, clozapine, olanzapine, the 5-HT1A receptor partial agonist buspirone, or the 5-HT2C receptor antagonist SB242084 at 30 min before freezing behaviour assessment. The 5-HT1A receptor antagonist WAY100635 or the 5-HT2C receptor agonist Ro60-0175 was also used concomitantly with asenapine. The effects of asenapine, clozapine, and olanzapine on serotonin release in the rat hippocampus were also measured using in vivo microdialysis. Asenapine reduced freezing behaviour, while neither clozapine nor olanzapine reduced freezing behaviour. Buspirone and SB242084 also reduced freezing behaviour. The effect of asenapine in reducing freezing behaviour was not altered by the concomitant administration of WAY100635 or Ro60-0175. Both asenapine and clozapine, but not olanzapine, increased serotonin release in the rat hippocampus. Asenapine may have superior therapeutic effect on anxiety symptoms than other agents, although the underlying mechanism of its anxiolytic activity remains unknown.

Fluoxetine reduces periodontal disease progression in a conditioned fear stress model in rats

Recent evidence suggests that the use of fluoxetine could reduce periodontal disease severity. However, the effect of fluoxetine on periodontal disease has not been tested in the context of conditioned fear stress (CFS). We hypothesized that inhibition of chronic stress by fluoxetine might decrease the levels of bone loss in periodontal disease. The aim of the present study was to analyze the effect of fluoxetine on bone loss in chronic periodontitis. Fourteen Wistar rats were submitted to ligature-induced periodontal disease and divided into four groups (A-D). Groups A (n=3) and B (n=4) were not stressed, while Groups C (n=3) and D (n=4) were submitted to a CFS paradigm for 38d. Daily fluoxetine (20mg/kg) was administered to Groups B and D from day 20 to day 39, at which point the rats were submitted to an open field test and killed on day 40. Mandibles were removed for histological and immunohistochemical analyses. Stress was associated with a higher level of bone loss in Group C compared with Group A. Additionally, no differences in bone loss were observed among Groups A, B and D. We showed that stress is associated with the progression of bone loss in a CFS model in rats and that fluoxetine treatment reduces the bone loss.

5-HT depletion, but not 5-HT1A antagonist, prevents the anxiolytic-like effect of citalopram in rat contextual conditioned fear stress model.

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) have been widely used in the treatment of most anxiety disorders. In this study, to clarify the mechanism of the anxiolytic effect, we investigated the mechanism underlying the effect of the SSRI citalopram on rat contextual conditioned fear stress (CFS), an animal model of anxiety. Rats individually received footshocks in a shock chamber. More than 1 day later, they were given citalopram and/or dl-p-chlorophenylalanine (PCPA), various subtype-selective serotonin (5-HT) receptor antagonists: the 5-HT1A receptor antagonist WAY 100635, the 5-HT2A receptor antagonist MDL 100907, the 5-HT2C receptor antagonist SB 242084, the 5-HT3 receptor antagonist tropisetron, the 5-HT4 receptor antagonist GR 125487, the 5-HT6 receptor antagonist SB 258585 or the 5-HT7 receptor antagonist SB 269970. After drug administration, freezing behaviour, which was used as an index of anxiety, was analysed in the same shock chamber without shocks. Citalopram dose dependently reduced conditioned freezing behaviour. The anxiolytic-like effect of citalopram was prevented completely by pretreatment with the 5-HT-depleting agent PCPA, but not by the 5-HT1A receptor antagonist WAY 100635. Furthermore, none of the subtype-selective 5-HT receptor antagonists significantly affected conditioned freezing or affected the anxiolytic-like effect of citalopram. The anxiolytic-like effect of citalopram in contextual CFS model depends on 5-HT availability. In addition, contextual CFS model is suggested to be completely different from conventional anxiety models in neural mechanism or manners of serotonergic involvement. However, further studies are needed to identify the pharmacological mechanisms responsible for the anxiolytic-like effect of citalopram.

The effects of the co-administration of the α1-adrenoreceptor antagonist prazosin on the anxiolytic effect of citalopram in conditioned fear stress in the rat

Several studies have shown that the α₁-adrenoreceptor is involved in controlling extracellular serotonin levels. The administration of the α₁-adrenoreceptor antagonist prazosin was shown to decrease extracellular serotonin levels in the hippocampus, the prefrontal cortex and the raphe nucleus, while the administration of the α₁-adrenoreceptor agonist cirazoline was shown to increase serotonin levels. Furthermore, the elevation of serotonin levels induced by the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) citalopram was attenuated by prazosin. Thus, α₁-adrenoreceptor antagonists may affect SSRI-induced increases in extracellular serotonin levels and their antidepressive and anxiolytic effects. However, little is known about the influence of α₁-adrenoreceptor antagonists on the behavioral pharmacological effects of SSRIs. The conditioned fear stress-induced freezing behavior is an animal model of anxiety and can detect the anxiolytic effect of SSRIs. To clarify whether an α₁-adrenoreceptor antagonist affects the anxiolytic action of SSRIs, we examined the effects of the co-administration of the α₁-adrenoreceptor antagonist prazosin and the SSRI citalopram using the contextual conditioned fear stress model. Low-dose prazosin (0.03 mg/kg) significantly attenuated the citalopram (3 mg/kg)-induced decrease in conditioned freezing. Moreover, high-dose (0.5 mg/kg), but not low-dose (0.03 mg/kg), prazosin significantly attenuated citalopram (10 mg/kg)-induced decreases in conditioned freezing. These drugs did not affect the spontaneous motor activity of the rats. Therefore, these results suggest that blocking the α₁-adrenoreceptor decreases the anxiolytic effect of citalopram.

Anxiolytic-like profile of mirtazapine in rat conditioned fear stress model: Functional significance of 5-hydroxytryptamine 1A receptor and α1-adrenergic receptor

Mirtazapine is an antidepressant with a unique mechanism of action and has been categorized as a Noradrenergic and Specific Serotonergic Antidepressant (NaSSA). Although numerous clinical trials suggested the usefulness of mirtazapine for not only major depressive disorders but also a variety of anxiety disorders, efficacy studies in animal anxiety models have been rarely reported. The present study investigated a potential anxiolytic-like profile of mirtazapine in rat conditioned fear stress model. A 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) 1A receptor partial agonist, buspirone (1–5 mg/kg) exhibited a significant reduction in freezing time, and its maximal effect was reversed by a selective 5-HT 1A antagonist, WAY-100635 (1 mg/kg). Mirtazapine (1–10 mg/kg) also reduced the freezing time in a dose-related fashion, a substantial proportion (approx. 50%) of which was likewise antagonized by WAY-100635 (1 mg/kg). Mianserin (1–30 mg/kg), a structural analogue for mirtazapine, was ineffective. Furthermore, co-administration of α1 adrenoceptor antagonist, prazosin (0.03 mg/kg) completely reversed mirtazapine (10 mg/kg)-induced reduction of freezing time. These findings represent the first demonstration that the anxiolytic-like action of mirtazapine involves activation of 5-HT 1A receptor and α1 adrenoceptor to different extents, and are compatible with one aspect of mirtazapine's pharmacological profile as NaSSA.

Pharmacokinetic interaction between tandospirone and fluvoxamine in the rat contextual conditioned fear stress model and its functional consequence: Involvement of cytochrome P450 3A4

In a previous study it was demonstrated that the anxiolytic action of tandospirone, a 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT)(1A) receptor agonist, is facilitated by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 inhibitors, such as ketoconazole and cimetidine. It is also known that fluvoxamine, a selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitor (SSRI), inhibits CYP3A4. The purpose of the present study was to clarify the pharmacokinetic interaction between tandospirone and fluvoxamine and to evaluate their combined effect in the rat anxiety model. The anxiolytic action of co-administration of tandospirone and fluvoxamine was examined using the rat contextual conditioned fear stress model. After testing the conditioned fear, plasma concentrations of tandospirone and its major metabolite 1-(2-pyrimidyl) piperazine were determined. One day after fear conditioning, both tandospirone (60 mg/kg, p.o.) and fluvoxamine (60 mg/kg, p.o.) significantly inhibited conditioned freezing and their combination effect was additive. In addition, plasma concentration of tandospirone was increased by fluvoxamine. There is a CYP3A4-related drug-drug interaction between tandospirone and fluvoxamine. Therefore, fluvoxamine may facilitate the anxiolytic effect of tandospirone via CYP3A4 inhibition.

An mGluR2/3 antagonist, MGS0039, exerts antidepressant and anxiolytic effects in behavioral models in rats

Abnormalities of glutamatergic neurotransmission have been reportedly observed in psychiatric disorders. Previously, we demonstrated that (1R, 2R, 3R, 5R, 6R)-2-Amino-3-(3,4-dichlorobenzyloxy)-6-fluorobicyclo[3.1.0]hexane-2,6-dicarboxylic acid (MGS0039) is a selective antagonist for group II metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluR2/3), and that it exerted antidepressant effects in some animal behavioral tests. In the present study, we provide additional evidence that MGS0039 exhibits antidepressant and anxiolytic effects in experimental rodent models, which are predictive of clinical efficacy. The learned helplessness (LH) paradigm, which is a common model used to examine the depressive state, was used to assess antidepressant effects of MGS0039. Moreover, anxiolytic effects of MGS0039 were investigated in the conditioned fear stress (CFS) model, which represents emotional abnormality, including anxiety. Intraperitoneal administration of MGS0039 (10 mg/kg) to rats for 7 days elicited a significant reduction in escape failures in the LH paradigm. In addition, rats treated with MGS0039 (2 mg/kg) showed significantly attenuated freezing behavior in a CFS model, indicating the anxiolytic-like potential of MGS0039. These results suggest that the blockade of mGluR2/3 with MGS0039 may be effective in the treatment of depressive and anxiety disorders.

P.1.086 R-citalopram counteracts the effect of escitalopram in a rat conditioned fear stress model of anxiety

P.1.086 R-citalopram counteracts the effect of escitalopram in a rat conditioned fear stress model of anxiety

R-citalopram counteracts the effect of escitalopram in a rat conditioned fear stress model of anxiety

S-citalopram (escitalopram) mediates the serotonin reuptake inhibitory effect of the racemate, R, S-citalopram. The effect of escitalopram (0.5–3.9 mg/kg) was investigated in a rat conditioned fear stress model of anxiety and compared to the effects of R-citalopram (1.0–7.8 mg/kg), R, S-citalopram (4.0 and 8.0 mg/kg), and escitalopram (2.0 mg/kg)+ R-citalopram (7.8 mg/kg). Diazepam (0.95 mg/kg) and buspirone (4.6 mg/kg) were included as positive controls. During an acquisition session, rats were allowed to freely explore a novel cage for 9 min. During that time, they received two inescapable footshocks through an electrifiable grid floor. Groups of nonshocked control rats were run in parallel. During an expression session on the next day, rats were treated with drug or vehicle 30 min before they were reintroduced into the test cage for a 9-min period this time without receiving footshocks and the total distance travelled was recorded. The distance travelled by vehicle-treated rats was markedly suppressed compared to a vehicle-treated group of nonshocked controls. Escitalopram produced a dose-dependent inhibition of the conditioned suppression of exploratory behaviour (minimal effective dose 1.0 mg/kg). Interestingly R, S-citalopram 4.0 and 8.0 mg/kg produced significantly smaller effect than escitalopram 2.0 and 4.0 mg/kg, receptively. R-citalopram, 7.8 mg/kg, produced a significant effect. However, in spite of this, R-citalopram (7.8 mg/kg) significantly inhibited the effect of escitalopram (2.0 mg/kg). The activity in drug-treated nonshocked groups was similar to the vehicle-treated group, except for the buspirone-treated group where a significant reduction was observed. The finding that R-citalopram inhibits the effect of escitalopram may be relevant to the improved clinical efficacy seen with escitalopram compared to R, S-citalopram in the treatment of anxiety and depression.

The psychological stress model using motor suppression

Psychological stress is believed to be implicated in the etiology of affective disorders such as anxiety and depression. To date, a wide range of behavioral responses including analgesia and motor suppression induced by various physiological stressors such as footshock, forced swimming and immobilization have been investigated in animals. However, there is little information concerning behavioral changes in psychological stress. This article describes the experimental procedures and the characteristics of motor suppression in psychological stress, defined as conditioned fear stress (CFS). Mice exhibit a marked suppression of motility when they are re-placed in the same environment in which they had previously received an electric footshock. This motor suppression is regarded as a conditioned emotional response to the environment associated with previous footshock. The motor suppression in CFS is attenuated by sigma receptor agonists such as (+)-N-allylnormetazocine and dextromethorphan, whereas typical anxiolytics (diazepam and chlordiazepoxide) and antidepressants (imipramine and fluoxetine) have no effect. These findings suggest that the CFS model may be useful for investigating the pathogenesis of affective disorders, particularly those considered to be treatment resistant, and for developing their novel therapeutic drugs.

S12-1 - Anxiolytic effect of serotonergic drugs in the conditioned fear stress model

S12-1 - Anxiolytic effect of serotonergic drugs in the conditioned fear stress model