Concurrent Medication Use Research Articles

Screening for Atrial Fibrillation (AF) by handheld single-lead ECG and risk of all-cause mortality stratified by non-AF cardiovascular disease

Abstract Purpose Screening for Atrial fibrillation (AF) has been suggested as a strategy to increase early detection of silent AF. We aimed to evaluate all-cause mortality between patients with screen-detected and clinically-diagnosed AF, and the effect of oral anticoagulation therapy (OAC) on mortality. Methods We prospectively enrolled and performed AF screening using handheld single-lead ECG(AliveCor) on consecutive patients who attended medical outpatient clinics during December 2014 and December 2017. Repeat screening was performed among patients who had >1 clinic visits. All participants were divided into 5 cohorts: (i) previously known AF at baseline (kAF); (ii) initial screen-detected AF (S1-AF); (iii) subsequent screen-detected AF (FU-sAF); (iv) clinically-diagnosed AF during follow-up (FU-cAF); and (v) no AF. Risk of all-cause mortality was estimated by adjusted hazard ratio (HR) using COX proportional hazards regression, adjusting for age, gender, co-morbidities, concurrent chronic use of medications including OAC, with AF detection or clinical diagnosis and OAC therapy handled as time-varying variable. Subgroup analysis was conducted to identify heterogeneity of effect across with or without non-AF cardiovascular disease (CVD). Results Of 11,972 subjects (mean age 76.6±7.8, female 49.2%), 18.7% (n=2,236) had previously kAF, 1.9% (n=223) S1-AF, 0.6% (n=71) FU-sAF, 7.3% (n=867) FU-cAF, and 71.6% (n=8,559) no AF. During a median FU duration of 6.8(IQR: 5.2-8.1) years, patients with kAF (HR=1.8(1.6-2.0)), S1-AF (HR=1.6(1.3-1.9)) and FU-cAF (HR=1.6(1.4-1.8)) were at higher risk of all-cause mortality, compared to individuals without AF, whereas FU-sAF (HR=1.0(0.7-1.4)) had similar low risk of death as no AF. Heterogeneity of effect was detected in subgroup analysis. Among patients without non-AF CVD, FU-sAF (HR=6.0(1.8-19.8)) and FU-cAF (HR=4.7(3.3-6.7)) were at markedly higher risk of all-cause mortality. DOAC (HR=0.57(0.38-0.87)) but not VKA (HR=0.72(0.43-1.15) reduced mortality. However, in patients with CVD other than AF, risk of FU-sAF (HR=1.1(0.8-1.6)) decreased to as low as individuals without AF (P for interaction =0.0039).Both DOAC (HR=0.51(0.46-0.58)) and VKA (HR=0.87(0.78-0.98) were beneficial. Conclusion Likely delayed AF detection suggested by groups of FU-cAF and FU-sAF may be associated with significant rise in risk of mortality among patients without non-AF CVD. The effect diminished when non-AF CVD as potential competing risk existed. The role of VKA in reducing all-cause mortality warrants more studies.

The trajectory of serum salicylate concentrations after ingestion of medicinal oil containing methyl salicylate

Introduction The toxicokinetics of methyl salicylate after unintentional or intentional ingestion of medicinal oil containing methyl salicylate has not been well studied. We aimed to characterize the trajectory of serum salicylate concentrations and to evaluate factors associated with the peak serum salicylate concentration and the time from ingestion to peak concentration. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients reported to the Hong Kong Poison Control Centre for laboratory-confirmed methyl salicylate poisoning by all local public emergency departments between 1 July 2008 and 30 June 2023. We analyzed cases with at least three serum salicylate concentrations. Multivariable generalized linear regression was used to identify factors significantly associated with the peak serum concentration and the time from ingestion to peak concentration. Results We included 41 patients (median age 81.0 years; 32 women and nine men). The median time from ingestion to the first peak serum salicylate concentration was 5.6 h (IQR: 3.2–10.8 h). Multiple regression showed that gastric aspiration (adjusted regression coefficient [β] − 2.50; 95% CI: −3.93 to −1.08; P = 0.001) and single-dose activated charcoal (adjusted β − 1.22; 95% CI: −2.02 to −0.42; P = 0.003) were significantly associated with a lower peak concentration, after adjusting for patient age, sex, exposure due to intentional self-harm, reported ingested dose, time from ingestion to emergency department presentation, vomiting, concurrent use of aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid) and other medications that affect gastric emptying or gastric acid secretion, blood pH, serum albumin concentration, and creatinine clearance. Discussion The serum salicylate concentration did not peak as quickly as generally believed, highlighting the importance of continued monitoring. Gastric aspiration and single-dose activated charcoal may help reduce gastrointestinal absorption, but their impact on clinical outcomes remains unclear. Conclusions Given the median time of 5.6 h (IQR: 3.2–10.8 h) from ingestion to the peak salicylate concentration, gastric aspiration and single-dose activated charcoal can be considered in patients up to a few hours after medicinal oil ingestion when the airway is protected.

Long-term opioid prescribing and the incidence of opioid-related hospitalizations or emergency department visits among patients with metastatic cancer.

200 Background: Many patients with metastatic cancer experience cancer-related pain which is commonly managed using opioids. Although opioids are an effective tool for cancer pain management, their use can result in adverse effects which may be related to long-term use and are understudied in this population. Therefore, we aimed to describe long-term opioid prescribing (LTOP) practices among patients with metastatic cancer and investigate the incidence of opioid-related hospitalizations and emergency department (ED) visits among recipients of long-term prescribing. Methods: This retrospective cohort study used population-based data from Alberta, Canada to identify patients diagnosed with stage IV cancers between 2004-2017 who had at least 1-year of follow-up and were opioid naïve at diagnosis. LTOP was defined as receipt of a ≥90-day supply of opioids with less than a 30-day gap in supply within a 180-day period. Prescribing practices were characterized according to timing (early vs. end-of-life [EoL] onset), morphine equivalent dose, duration, and concurrent medication use. The EoL phase of disease was defined as the year preceding death. The incidence rate of opioid-related encounters was compared between different characteristics of LTOP. Results: The study included a total of 10927 patients, 2521 (23%) of whom received long-term opioid prescribing after diagnosis. LTOP became more common as patients approached EoL, with most patients (53%) having LTOP initiated only within their last year of life. 85 patients (3.4%) experienced an opioid-related hospitalization or ED visit after initiation of LTOP, with an incidence rate of 2.36 (95% CI 1.92, 2.86) encounters per 100 person-years. Higher opioid dosage and concurrent prescribing of anxiolytics, benzodiazepines, antidepressants, and neuroleptic medications were significantly associated with a higher incidence of opioid-related encounters. Conclusions: Long-term opioid prescribing is commonly experienced by patients living with metastatic cancer as a chronic disease. The concurrent use of psychoactive drugs during LTOP was associated with experiencing opioid-related hospitalizations/ED visits.

Impact of Age and Concurrent Antiseizure Medication Use on Lacosamide Dose to Concentration Ratio and Dosing in Pediatric Patients.

To evaluate age, adjunctive antiseizure medication (ASM), and specific ASMs on lacosamide (LCM) weight normalized dose-to-concentration ratio (DCR) and US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) dosing guidelines in pediatric patients. Patients 1 mo to ≤18 years with a LCM serum concentration between October 2009 and June 2017 were considered. Demographics, LCM DCR, and adjunctive ASM were recorded. LCM DCR/hr was used as a surrogate for clearance. Data were stratified by age (1 mo-< 2 yr; ≥ 2-6 yr; ≥ 6-12 yr; and ≥12-≤18 yr), FDA dosing weights, and ASM potential to interaction with LCM. There were 646 sera (380 patients) with median dose 8.36 mg/kg/day (IQR, 5.92-11.16). 50.2% of doses were within FDA-weight guidelines; however, 40.4% exceeded recommendations. Most (81.3%) LCM concentrations were between 2 and 12 mg/L. A difference existed in DCR between ages, with those <2 years having the highest DCR (p < 0.001). Moving across age groups, the DCR decreases by 30.7%, 50.5%, and 63.4%. There was a weak (r2 = 0.073) but significant (p < 0.001) negative correlation between DCR and age. 84.8% received adjunctive ASM consisting of at least one of 31 different ASMs. DCR was higher with adjunctive ASMs compared with monotherapy [0.061 (0.039-0.095) vs 0.043 (0.030-0.062)], respectively (p < 0.001) and was greatest with inducers. Phenobarbital increased DCR by 2.6-fold, topiramate by 72.1%, and clobazam by 32.6%. Inhibitors had no effect. The correlation between age and DCR was weak, accounting for 6% of variability. Strong inducers significantly increased DCR. Synergy may exist when multiple inducers are given. Weak inhibitors did not affect DCR. Those ≥6 to 11 kg, ≥30 to 50 kg, and those given strong inducers may require larger -initial LCM doses. Serum concentrations should be used to individualize dosing, especially in those receiving strong inducers.

Effect of sleep quality on repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation outcomes in depression.

While repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is effective for 50-60% of those treatment-resistant depression, it is critical to identify predictors of response for optimal patient selection to improve therapy. Insomnia is a known symptom of depression that is both correlated with depression severity and associated with poor antidepressant response. Therefore, understanding this relationship may open new opportunities for the optimization of rTMS treatment. We aimed to explore whether baseline sleep quality, specifically insomnia, is associated with rTMS outcomes in a naturalistic sample of 975 patients (age 18-90; 63.9% F) receiving a standard course of rTMS treatment from two outpatient TMS clinics located within psychiatric hospitals in the United States. One site additionally collected information on concurrent medication use on 350 patients; among these, we examined whether pharmacological treatment of insomnia affected TMS treatment response. Depression was measured using the 30-item Inventory of Depressive Symptomology Self Report (IDS-SR) in site one and an abbreviated 16-item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomology (QIDS) derived from the IDS-SR in site two. Sleep disturbances were measured using three insomnia-related questions. Multilevel logistic regression was used to determine whether baseline insomnia scores were associated with TMS treatment outcome. Upon dichotomous categorization of the sample by insomnia and sleep-medication use, depression and sleep scores were analyzed across time using mixed repeated measures ANOVA. We found that sleep quality improves after TMS (p<.001) and correlates with improvement in non-insomnia related depression symptoms (r= .318, p<.001). We found that among those who had significant insomnia at baseline, those not using sleep medications had significantly worse post-treatment IDS-SR scores compared to those using sleep medications (p=. 021) despite no difference in final insomnia score. Together, our results suggest that while baseline insomnia is not associated with TMS effectiveness, treating insomnia may affect the trajectory of TMS therapy. Future prospective studies are needed to examine the effect of insomnia treatment alongside TMS for depression.

The medication usage pattern and prevalence of polypharmacy among patients with sickle cell disease: a population-based study in southern Iran

ABSTRACT Background Due to the numerous complications associated with sickle cell disease (SCD), patients often receive a variety of medications alongside their SCD treatment. However, a notable gap exists in the current literature regarding medication use patterns among them. This study aimed to investigate medication usage patterns in patients with SCD. Research design and methods This cross-sectional study, conducted in Bushehr Province, employed a stratified random sampling method to select eligible participants with SCD. A thorough interview gathered various information, including details about the medications. The Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical classification system was utilized for drug classification. Polypharmacy was defined as the concurrent use of at least five medications. Results A total of 300 individuals with SCD were included in this study. Polypharmacy was observed in 26.3% (95% CI: 20.8%-32.8%) of the study population. The analyses revealed positive associations between the use of more concurrent medication use and higher age groups and having multimorbidity. Antianemic preparations (86.7%), antineoplastic agents (58.3%), and vitamins (41.0%) were the most frequent medication classes used by the study participants. Conclusions Our study revealed notable underutilization of hydroxyurea and a high rate of polypharmacy, associated with age and multimorbidity, among patients with SCD in southern Iran.

A Systematic Review of Healthcare Providers Awareness of Medication Switching for Polypharmacy Patients in Saudi Arabia

Background: Polypharmacy, the concurrent use of multiple medications by an individual, presents challenges in medication management, patient safety, and healthcare outcomes, particularly among older adults. In Saudi Arabia, the prevalence of polypharmacy is increasing due to the aging population and the burden of chronic diseases. Understanding healthcare providers' awareness and practices regarding medication switching is crucial for optimizing medication use and improving patient outcomes. Study Aim: This systematic review aims to synthesize and analyze existing literature on healthcare providers' awareness of medication switching for polypharmacy patients in Saudi Arabia. The study focuses on pharmacists and physicians, exploring their knowledge, attitudes, and practices related to medication management, deprescribing, pharmacovigilance, and Medication Therapy Management (MTM) services. Methodology: A systematic search was conducted across major databases, including PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar, using predefined search terms related to polypharmacy, medication switching, healthcare providers' awareness, and Saudi Arabia. Eligible studies were selected based on inclusion criteria, including study design, setting, participants, and relevance to the study aim. Data extraction and synthesis were performed to analyze key findings and themes related to healthcare providers' awareness of medication switching. Results: Six eligible studies were included in the systematic review, encompassing survey-based investigations, cross-sectional studies, and qualitative studies conducted in various healthcare settings across Saudi Arabia. The findings revealed gaps in pharmacists' and physicians' knowledge regarding Potentially Inappropriate Medications (PIMs), Drug-Drug Interactions (DDIs), pharmacovigilance practices, and deprescribing strategies. Recommendations for improving pharmacists' education, enhancing pharmacovigilance practices, and promoting collaborative care models were highlighted. Conclusion: Healthcare providers in Saudi Arabia demonstrate varying levels of awareness and practices regarding medication switching for polypharmacy patients. There is a need for targeted educational interventions, standardized pharmacovigilance practices, and collaborative efforts among healthcare providers to optimize medication use, reduce polypharmacy-related risks, and improve patient outcomes.

Paternal Use of Metformin During the Sperm Development Period Preceding Conception and Risk for Major Congenital Malformations in Newborns.

Metformin is the most used oral antidiabetic medication. Despite its established safety profile, it has known antiandrogenic and epigenetic modifying effects. This raised concerns about possible adverse developmental effects caused by genomic alterations related to paternal use of metformin during the spermatogenesis period preceding conception. To assess the potential adverse intergenerational effect of metformin by examining the association between paternal metformin use during spermatogenesis and major congenital malformations (MCMs) in newborns. Nationally representative cohort study. A large Israeli health fund. 383 851 live births linked to fathers and mothers that occurred in 1999 to 2020. MCMs and parental cardiometabolic conditions were ascertained using clinical diagnoses, medication dispensing information, and laboratory test results. The effect of metformin use on MCMs was estimated using general estimating equations, accounting for concurrent use of other antidiabetic medications and parental cardiometabolic morbidity. Compared with unexposed fathers, the prevalence of cardiometabolic morbidity was substantially higher among fathers who used metformin during spermatogenesis, and their spouses. Whereas the crude odds ratio (OR) for paternal metformin exposure in all formulations and MCMs was 1.28 (95% CI, 1.01 to 1.64), the adjusted OR was 1.00 (CI, 0.76 to 1.31). Within specific treatment regimens, the adjusted OR was 0.86 (CI, 0.60 to 1.23) for metformin in monotherapy and 1.36 (CI, 1.00 to 1.85) for metformin in polytherapy, a treatment that was more common in patients with more poorly controlled diabetes. Laboratory test results for hemoglobin A1c to assess underlying diabetes severity were available only for a subset of the cohort. Paternal use of metformin in monotherapy does not increase the risk for MCMs. Association for metformin in polytherapy could potentially be explained by worse underlying parental cardiometabolic risk profile. None.

The interactions between psychotropic medication and drugs used in the treatment of cardiovascular diseases

The coexistence of psychiatric disorders and cardiovascular diseases represents a complex clinical challenge, often necessitating the concurrent use of medications from both therapeutic categories. While these medications are essential for managing their respective pathologies, their combined use can lead to interactions that may affect treatment outcomes and patient safety. Understanding the interactions between psychotropic drugs and those used in cardiovascular diseases is crucial for healthcare professionals to optimize therapeutic regimens and minimize potential adverse effects. This article aims to explore the various types of interactions between psychotropic and cardiovascular medications, analyze their underlying mechanisms, evaluate the clinical implications, and propose strategies to reduce risks and optimize treatment outcomes. By understanding these interactions, healthcare professionals can enhance clinical decision-making and provide safer and more effective pharmacotherapy for patients with complex medical needs.

Adverse event signal mining and serious adverse event influencing factor analysis of fulvestrant based on FAERS database

Fulvestrant, as the first selective estrogen receptor degrader, is widely used in the endocrine treatment of breast cancer. However, in the real world, there is a lack of relevant reports on adverse reaction data mining for fulvestrant. To perform data mining on adverse events (AEs) associated with fulvestrant and explore the risk factors contributing to severe AEs, providing a reference for the rational use of fulvestrant in clinical practice. Retrieved adverse event report information associated with fulvestrant from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database, covering the period from market introduction to September 30, 2023. Suspicious AEs were screened using the reporting odds ratio (ROR) and proportional reporting ratio methods based on disproportionality analysis. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted on severe AEs to explore the risk factors associated with fulvestrant-induced severe AEs. A total of 6947 reports related to AEs associated with fulvestrant were obtained, including 5924 reports of severe AEs and 1023 reports of non-severe AEs. Using the disproportionality analysis method, a total of 210 valid AEs were identified for fulvestrant, with 45 AEs (21.43%) not listed in the product labeling, involving 11 systems and organs. The AEs associated with fulvestrant were sorted by frequency of occurrence, with neutropenia (325 cases) having the highest number of reports. By signal strength, injection site pruritus showed the strongest signal (ROR = 658.43). The results of the logistic regression analysis showed that concurrent use of medications with extremely high protein binding (≥ 98%) is an independent risk factor for severe AEs associated with fulvestrant. Age served as a protective factor for fulvestrant-related AEs. The co-administration of fulvestrant with CYP3A4 enzyme inhibitors did not show statistically significant correlation with the occurrence of severe AEs. Co-administration of drugs with extremely high protein binding (≥ 98%) may increase the risk of severe adverse reactions of fulvestrant. Meanwhile, age (60–74 years) may reduce the risk of severe AEs of fulvestrant. However, further clinical research is still needed to explore and verify whether there is interaction between fulvestrant and drugs with high protein binding through more clinical studies.

Abstract PO5-11-08: Assessing practice patterns of antidepressant medication and tamoxifen use among patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer

Abstract Background: Treatment with endocrine therapy such as tamoxifen has been identified as one of the most important variables linked with survival among women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer (BC). There is significant risk reduction of BC recurrence and BC mortality at 15 years among patients treated with tamoxifen for 5 years compared to no endocrine therapy. Tamoxifen is metabolized in the liver via multiple cytochrome P (CYP) isoforms. To ensure optimal efficacy of tamoxifen, consideration must be given to concomitant use of other commonly prescribed drugs such as antidepressants. Some selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are potent inhibitors of CYP2D6, an enzyme that metabolizes tamoxifen into its active metabolite, endoxifen, which has anti-tumor effect. Such inhibition can reduce the plasma concentration of endoxifen which could lead to higher rates of BC recurrence. This resulted in an FDA black box warning discouraging concurrent prescriptions of tamoxifen and SSRIs, yet clinical data to support this warning is lacking. Our aim is to describe the practice patterns of concomitant use of tamoxifen and antidepressant medication at our institution. Methods: This is a single institution retrospective study that included adult women, ages 18-99, with stage I-IV BC, who received adjuvant tamoxifen and were taking an antidepressant medication between years 2016-2021. Patients were identified from a tumor registry database. Patient demographics and tumor characteristics were collected via electronic medical record. Results: A total of 419 patients met the inclusion criteria. At the start of tamoxifen therapy, 348 women were on at least one antidepressant, mostly for Major Depressive Disorder (86%). Of those women, 22% were prescribed a strong/moderately potent CYP inhibitor (paroxetine, fluoxetine, duloxetine, or bupropion) and 43% were prescribed weak or non-CYP inhibiting SSRIs (citalopram, escitalopram, fluvoxamine, and sertraline). The most commonly prescribed antidepressants at the start of tamoxifen, alone or in combination with a second antidepressant, were: venlafaxine (30%), escitalopram (17%), sertraline (13%), citalopram (12%) and duloxetine (10%). Main prescribers of antidepressants were primary care physicians (70%), psychiatrists (10%) followed by academic medical oncologists (7%) and regional medical oncologists (6%). Interestingly, the majority of women continued taking the same antidepressant after starting tamoxifen (76%) while, at least 10% of patients changed anti-depressant classes prior to starting tamoxifen, due to concern for drug-drug interaction. When a different class of antidepressant was chosen after starting tamoxifen (22%), serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) were the most frequent class (48%), followed by a different SSRI (42%). The time in which the antidepressant change occurred was variable, but most commonly prior to initiating tamoxifen. Conclusion: Concurrent use of tamoxifen and antidepressant medications is common. Theoretical risk of reduced efficacy of tamoxifen with inhibitors of CYP leads to medication changes for some but not all patients requiring tamoxifen and an antidepressant medication. This can have clinical implications as stability on a specific antidepressant is important for patients and adjustment may impact control of their mood disorder. In some cases, even if a drug-drug interaction was identified, some patients chose to continue their current antidepressant due to concerns of mood de-stabilization, and in other cases, aromatase inhibitors were started as an alternative. These findings highlight differences in practice patterns for which additional guidance may be helpful in bringing awareness and standardization to care. Citation Format: Mariah Ondeck, Bennett Osantowski, Nerea Lopetegui-Lia, Wei Wei, Alexandra Murray, Amanda Maggiotto, Halle Moore, Erin Roesch. Assessing practice patterns of antidepressant medication and tamoxifen use among patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO5-11-08.

Cost-effectiveness of diabetic retinopathy screening for newly diagnosed type 2 diabetic patients: A nationwide population-based propensity score-matched cohort study

AimsThis study investigated the association between the frequency of screening for diabetic retinopathy (DR) versus the development of DR and corresponding medical expenses among patients newly diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). MethodsThis longitudinal, population-based study used the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database (2004 to 2020) as a data source. Propensity score matching (PSM) (sex, age, comorbidities and concurrent medication use) was employed in the grouping of T2DM patients according to different frequency of DR screening. Outcome measures included the proportion of patients who developed DR, who received DR treatment, and the associated medical expenses and hospitalizations. ResultsThe 17-year cohort included 337,046 patients. After PSM, three groups each containing 35,739 patients were assembled and analyzed. Compared to low-frequency screening, high-frequency screening was more effective in detecting patients requiring treatment; however, the net cost for treatment was significantly lower. Standard-frequency screening appears to provide the best balance in terms of DR detection, diagnosis interval, the risk of DR-related hospitalization, and DR treatment costs. ConclusionsIn this real-world cohort study covering all levels of the healthcare system, infrequent screening was associated with delayed diagnosis and elevated treatment costs, while a fundus screening interval of 1–2 years proved optimal in terms of detection and medical expenditures.

Polypharmacy and associated factors in South Korean elderly patients with dementia: An analysis using National Health Insurance claims data.

Dementia is accompanied by several symptoms, including cognitive function decline, as well as behavioral and psychological symptoms. Elderly patients with dementia often experience polypharmacy, the concurrent use of multiple medications, due to chronic comorbidities. However, research on polypharmacy in patients with dementia is limited. This study aimed to characterize polypharmacy and associated factors among elderly patients with dementia in South Korea, and compare the characteristics of patients with and without dementia patients. From the National Health Insurance Service (NHIS)-Senior cohort database, we extracted data on patients aged≥60 years who received outpatient treatment in 2019. Polypharmacy was defined as the concurrent use of five or more different oral medications for ≥90 days; excessive polypharmacy referred to the concurrent use of ten or more different oral medications for ≥90 days. We compared the prevalence of polypharmacy between patients with and without and identified the associated factors using a logistic regression model. About 70.3% and 23.7% of patients with dementia exhibited polypharmacy and excessive polypharmacy, respectively. After adjusting for conditions such as age and Charlson's comorbidity index, the likelihood of polypharmacy and excessive polypharmacy significantly increased over time after the diagnosis of dementia. Additionally, under the same conditions, Medical Aid beneficiaries with dementia were more likely to experience polypharmacy and excessive polypharmacy compared to patients with dementia covered by National Health Insurance (NHI). This study reports the latest evidence on the status and risk factors of polypharmacy in elderly patients with dementia. We proposed that careful monitoring and management are required for patients at high risk for polypharmacy.

Potential Applications of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Managing Polypharmacy in Saudi Arabia: A Narrative Review.

Prescribing medications is a fundamental practice in the management of illnesses that necessitates in-depth knowledge of clinical pharmacology. Polypharmacy, or the concurrent use of multiple medications by individuals with complex health conditions, poses significant challenges, including an increased risk of drug interactions and adverse reactions. The Saudi Vision 2030 prioritises enhancing healthcare quality and safety, including addressing polypharmacy. Artificial intelligence (AI) offers promising tools to optimise medication plans, predict adverse drug reactions and ensure drug safety. This review explores AI's potential to revolutionise polypharmacy management in Saudi Arabia, highlighting practical applications, challenges and the path forward for the integration of AI solutions into healthcare practices.

IJCM_104A: Polypharmacy and medication adherence among elderly population in a rural area of Ernakulam district, Kerala.

Background: Polypharmacy is the concurrent use of multiple medications. Although there is no standard definition, polypharmacy is often defined as the routine use of five or more medications. This includes over-the-counter, prescription and/or traditional and complementary medicines used by a patient Objective: The aim of the study was to assess the prevalence of polypharmacy, describe the number and types of drugs used, and to determine medication adherence in elderly population Methodology: A cross sectional study was conducted among 364 elderly population residing in Vypin Block of Ernakulam district, Kerala by probability-proportional-to-size sampling. A semi structured questionnaire was administered by face-to-face interview to collect details on sociodemographic profile, regular medications and Morisky Medication-Taking Adherence Scale- MMAS (4-item) to assess medication adherence. The study participants were categorized into poor and good adherence based on MMAS score Results: More than half (53%) of the elderly were females, with a mean age of 69 ± 7 years. The prevalence of polypharmacy among the study population was 14.6% [95% CI, 11-18.2]. The most commonly used medications (35%) were oral blood glucose-lowering agents, followed by antihypertensive drugs and lipid-modifying agents. The vast majority (86.5%) had good medication adherence according to MMAS score. The independent determinants of medication adherence in our study were males (aOR=2.53 CI 1.09-5.08; p= 0.03) Christian religion (aOR=3.84 CI 1.43-10.34; p=0.008), staying along with family (aOR=8.15 CI 2.04-32.5; p=0.003), having polypharmacy (aOR=3.69 CI 1.54-2.82; p=0.003) and not having to pay for medications (aOR=3.4 CI 1.51- 7.64; p=0.003) were found statistically significant with medication adherence Conclusion: In order to improve medication adherence, the health care system should focus on women, those who stay alone and those who have to pay for medications

Using Haptic Technology for Pain Reduction and Functional Improvement

Advancements to reduce pain severity and improve functionality are generally lacking. Chronic or recurrent pain is the most common reason patients consult primary care clinicians. Adverse events associated with existing pharmacological pain treatments have incentivized researchers to identify effective pain treatment strategies that have limited side effects, including non-invasive and non-pharmacologic options. Research has shown that a clearer understanding of the pain neuromatrix may assist in identifying alternative approaches and improving patient outcomes. A network consisting of neuronal pathways and circuits responding to sensory (nociceptive) stimulation makes up the neuromatrix of pain. Research provides strong support that these pathways and areas of the brain have elicited change in response to external stimuli. Advancements in the understanding of how external tactile stimuli, specifically “haptic vibrotactile trigger technology (VTT)” disrupts the neuromatrix of pain, has led to the development of technology that shows promise in targeting the nociceptive pathways. Through ongoing research, the technology has been incorporated into non-invasive, non-pharmacological topical patches and other routes of delivery to evaluate response as it relates to different health concerns and conditions. The purpose of this IRB-approved, minimal risk, randomized, and blinded study was to evaluate patients’ experiences and/or perceptions and patient response for those who received a haptic vibrotactile trigger technology (VTT) embedded non-pharmacologic, non-invasive, over-the-counter pain patch (FREEDOM Super Patch with VTT; Srysty Holding CO, Toronto, Canada) and those who received a placebo patch without the embedded technology. This final outcome data from the HARMONI Study adds to previously published interim data. Methods: Baseline, 7- and 14-day data were recorded in one hundred sixty-eight (168) adult subjects (107 females and 61 males) in a Treatment Group (n=148) or Control Group (n=20) with a mean age of 53 years who presented with mild, moderate and even severe musculoskeletal, arthritic and neurological pain. The study evaluated changes in overall severity and interference scores via a validated scale (Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)), changes in the use of prescription and OTC medications, patient satisfaction, and any side effects reported while using an active or placebo patch. Results: For the Treatment Group, results showed statistically significant decreases in mean BPI severity and interference scores after using the VTT embedded pain patch. After 14 days, the vast majority of patients reported “less” or “a lot less” usage of oral medications and were very/extremely satisfied with the patch. Results also showed statistically significant and positive outcomes in all measured Quality of Life (QoL) components with improvements in general activity, mood, relations with other people, sleep, normal work, walking ability, and enjoyment of life. In the Control Group, there were no significant changes in pain severity, interference levels, usage of medications, and patient satisfaction was poor during the 14 day study period. Conclusions: Study results indicate that this non-pharmacologic, non-invasive, haptic vibrotactile trigger technology (VTT) embedded topical patch reduces pain severity and interference scores and may reduce the use of concurrent medications, including prescribed anti-inflammatory and other oral medication for adult patients with arthritic, neuropathic, and musculoskeletal pain. Results reported suggest that the non-pharmacological topical pain patch should be added to the current arsenal of noninvasive and nonpharmacological pain therapies.

Assessing the immediate impact of Twin-block appliance insertion on adolescents' sleep using a wearable device.

This prospective clinical study aimed to evaluate the immediate impact of Twin-block appliance insertion on the sleep of adolescents using a wearable device. A total of 24 girls, aged 11-13 years, with Class II division 1 molar relationship, skeletal class 2 malocclusion (ANB ≥5) and overjet measuring ≥5 mm were selected. Exclusion criteria included a history of previous orthodontic treatment, systemic disease, irregular sleep pattern, obstructive sleep apnea, medical history of breathing disorders, or concurrent use of medications. Participants wore a wearable device to measure sleep parameters, including deep sleep, light sleep, minutes awake during sleep, wake-up times, bedtimes and total sleep times. The participants wore the device for 10 days prior to Twin-block insertion and sleep data were collected for another 10 days after insertion. Following the insertion of the Twin-block appliance, there was a highly statistically significant shift in bedtime and wake-up time to later hours (P < .001). All participants experienced a highly significant delay in bedtime compared to the recommended 10 pm time (P < .001). Additionally, there was a significant increase in the duration of light sleep (P < .05). However, the effect on deep sleep, minutes awake during sleep and sleep duration was not statistically significant. None of the sleep parameters tested showed statistically significant changes between the first 5 days after Twin-block insertion with the subsequent 5 days. The immediate insertion of the Twin-block appliance disrupts sleep onset, wake-up time and light sleep during the specified period of 10 days.

Risk Factors for Acute Kidney Injury in Patients Receiving Intravenous Colistin

Background: Colistin use is primarily associated with nephrotoxicity, which has been shown to be reversible with a low incidence of long-term kidney impairment. This study aimed to investigate the risk factors for acute kidney injury (AKI) in patients receiving intravenous colistin. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at Nakornping Hospital in northern Thailand from 2015 to 2020. Adult patients who received intravenous colistin were included, while those with chronic kidney disease or prior renal replacement therapy were excluded. The study assessed potential AKI risk factors, including demographics, comorbidities, and concurrent use of medications. Cases of AKI are identified among the cohort, while the control group includes individuals not experiencing AKI during the follow-up but similar to the cases in terms of the exposure. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify risk factors associated with AKI. Results: Among the 206 patients included in the study, a majority were admitted to the intensive care unit, required mechanical ventilation, and experienced septic shock. Univariate analysis revealed diabetes (odd ratio (OR)=2.82, 95% CI: 1.21–6.59, p=0.016), malignancy (OR=2.06, 95% CI:1.12–3.77, p=0.020), and baseline Scr (OR=0.71, 95% CI: 0.51–0.99, p=0.048) as significant risk factors for AKI. Multivariate analysis confirmed the association of diabetes (adjusted odd ratio(aOR)= 3.09, 95% CI: 1.20–7.96, p=0.019), malignancy (aOR= 2.31, 95% CI: 1.18–4.52, p=0.015), septic shock (aOR = 2.80, 95% CI: 1.02–7.69, p=0.045), and vasopressor use (aOR = 2.85, 95% CI: 1.12–7.23, p=0.028) with an increased risk of AKI. Conversely, baseline Scr (aOR = 0.54, 95% CI: 0.36–0.82, p=0.004) were associated with a decreased risk of AKI. Other factors, including concomitant use of aminoglycosides, vancomycin, rifampin, combination therapy, nephrotoxins, hypertension, and intensive care unit admission, did not show significant associations. Conclusion: This study identified diabetes, malignancy, septic shock, and vasopressor use as significant risk factors for AKI in patients receiving colistin. Baseline Scr levels were found to be inversely associated with the risk of AKI. These findings contribute to a better understanding of colistin-related nephrotoxicity and can guide clinical management to mitigate the risk of AKI in this patient population.

Point-of-care ultrasound is a useful adjunct tool to a clinician's assessment in the evaluation of severe hyponatraemia.

Hyponatraemia is the most common electrolyte disorder in inpatients resulting mainly from an imbalance in water homeostasis. Intravascular fluid status assessment is pivotal but is often challenging given multimorbidity, polypharmacy and diuretics use. We evaluated the utility of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) as an adjunct tool to standard practice for fluid assessment in severe hyponatraemia patients. Patients presenting with severe hyponatremia (Serum Sodium [Na] < 120 mmol/L; Normal range: 135-145 mol/L), managed by standard care were included. Hyponatraemia biochemistry work-up and POCUS examination were undertaken. Both clinician and POCUS independently assigned one of the three fluid status groups of hypovolaemia, hypervolaemia or euvolaemia. The final diagnosis of three fluid status groups at admission was made at the time of discharge by retrospective case review. Clinician's (standard of care) and POCUS fluid assessments were compared to that of the final diagnosis at the time of discharge. n = 19 patients were included. Median Na on admission was 113 mmol/L (109-116), improved to 129 ± 3 mmol/L on discharge. POCUS showed the higher degree of agreement with the final diagnosis (84%; n = 16/19), followed by the clinician (63%; n = 12/19). A trend towards higher accuracy of POCUS compared to clinician assessment of fluid status was noted (84% vs. 63%, p = 0.1611). Biochemistry was unreliable in 58% (n = 11/19) likely due to renal failure, polypharmacy or diuretic use. Inappropriate emergency fluid management was undertaken in 37% (n = 7/19) of cases based on initial clinician assessment. Thirst symptom correlated to hypovolaemia in 80% (4/5) cases. As subjective clinical and biochemistry assessments of fluid status are often unreliable due to co-morbidities and concurrent use of medications, POCUS can be a rapid objective diagnostic tool to assess fluid status in patients with severe hyponatraemia, to guide accurate emergency fluid management.

Disentangling drug contributions: anticholinergic burden in older adults linked to individual medications: a cross-sectional population-based study

BackgroundMedications with potent anticholinergic properties have well-documented adverse effects. A high cumulative anticholinergic burden may arise from the concurrent use of multiple medications with weaker anticholinergic effects. We sought to identify patterns of high anticholinergic burden and associated patient characteristics.MethodsWe identified patients aged ≥ 65 who filled ≥ 1 medication with anticholinergic adverse effects in 2019 and had a cumulative Anticholinergic Burden score (ACB) ≥ 4 (i.e., high anticholinergic burden) in a large US health insurer. We classified patients based on how they attained high burden, as follows: 1) only filling strong or moderate anticholinergic medications (i.e., ACB = 2 or 3, “moderate/strong”), 2) only filling lightly anticholinergic medications (i.e., ACB = 1, “light/possible”), and 3) filling any combination (“mix”). We used multinomial logistic regression to assess the association between measured patient characteristics and membership in the three anticholinergic burden classifications, using the moderate/strong group as the referent.ResultsIn total, 83,286 eligible patients with high anticholinergic burden were identified (mean age: 74.3 years (SD:7.1), 72.9% female). Of these, 4.5% filled only strong/moderate anticholinergics, 4.3% filled only light/possible anticholinergics, and the rest filled a mix (91.2%). Within patients in the mixed group, 64.3% of medication fills were for light/possible anticholinergics, while 35.7% were for moderate/strong anticholinergics. Compared with patients in the moderate/strong anticholinergics group, patients filling only light/possible anticholinergics were more likely to be older (adjusted Odds Ratio [aOR] per 1-unit of age: 1.06, 95%CI: 1.05–1.07), less likely to be female (aOR: 0.56, 95%CI: 0.50–0.62 vs. male), more likely to have comorbidities (e.g., heart failure aOR: 3.18, 95%CI: 2.70–3.74 or depression aOR: 1.20, 95%CI: 1.09–1.33 vs. no comorbidity), and visited fewer physicians (aOR per 1-unit of change: 0.98, 95%CI: 0.97–0.98). Patients in the mixed group were older (aOR per 1-unit of age: 1.02, 95%CI: 1.02–1.03) and less likely to be female (aOR: 0.89, 95%CI: 0.82–0.97 vs. male) compared with those filling moderate/strong anticholinergics.ConclusionMost older adults accumulated high anticholinergic burden through a combination of light/possible and moderate/strong anticholinergics rather than moderate/strong anticholinergics, with light/possible anticholinergics being the major drivers of overall anticholinergic burden. These insights may inform interventions to improve prescribing in older adults.