Concomitant Use Of Proton Pump Inhibitors Research Articles

Impact of proton pump inhibitors on the efficacy of androgen receptor signaling inhibitors in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients.

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are widely used due to their affordability and minimal severe side effects. However, their influence on the efficacy of cancer treatments, particularly androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSIs), remains unclear. This study investigates the impact of PPI usage on the treatment outcomes in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). A total of 117 mCRPC patients were retrospectively analyzed and divided into two groups based on the concomitant use of PPI at the initiation of ARSI treatment: PPI+ (n = 38) and PPI- (n = 79). Patient characteristics, including age at ARSI treatment administered, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) value at ARSI treatment administered, International Society of Urological Pathology grade group at prostate biopsy, metastatic site at ARSI treatment administered, prior docetaxel (DTX) treatment, and type of ARSI (abiraterone acetate or enzalutamide) were recorded. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and PSA response rates were compared between the two groups. Patients were further stratified by clinical background to compare PFS and OS between the two groups. The PPI- group exhibited significantly extended PFS and a trend toward improved OS. For PSA response (reduction of 50% or more from baseline), the rates were 62.3% and 45.9% in the PPI- group and the PPI+ group, respectively. For deep PSA response (reductions of 90% or more from baseline), the rates were 36.4% and 24.3% in the PPI- group and the PPI+ group, respectively. The effects were consistent across subgroups divided by prior DTX treatment and type of ARSI administered. The administration of PPIs appears to diminish the therapeutic efficacy of ARSIs in mCRPC patients. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings and explore the biological mechanisms involved.

Abstract PO1-01-08: The impact of drug-drug interactions between palbociclib and proton pump inhibitors on clinical outcomes of patients with hormone receptor positive, HER2-negative, early breast cancer: an exploratory analysis of the PALLAS study

Abstract Background: Data suggest that concomitant intake of proton pump inhibitors (PPI) may create drug-drug interactions, potentially impacting efficacy of agents including palbociclib, which is widely used in the treatment of metastatic hormone-receptor-positive/HER2-negative (HR+/HER2-) breast cancer. In the open label, randomized, phase 3 PALLAS trial, the addition of palbociclib for two years to standard adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) in patients with HR+/HER2- early breast cancer (EBC) did not improve invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) compared to adjuvant ET alone. We explored whether concomitant use of PPIs could have affected clinical outcomes in patients treated with palbociclib in PALLAS. Methods: This is an exploratory, unplanned analysis of the PALLAS trial (AFT-05/ABCSG-42/PrE0109/BIG-14-13, NCT02513394), which enrolled 5796 patients with stage II-III HR+/HER2- EBC. Patients were randomized to receive either 2 years of palbociclib (125 mg oral capsules once daily on days 1-21 of a 28-day cycle) with adjuvant ET or ET alone. Primary endpoint was IDFS in the intention-to-treat population. The present exploratory analysis included patients who received at least one dose of palbociclib. Definitions of IDFS, distant relapse-free survival (DRFS) and overall survival (OS) were according to the PALLAS protocol (STEEP criteria), using first day of palbociclib intake as start date. Only PPI concomitant intake during palbociclib treatment was considered. To determine the association of concomitant PPI use with IDFS, DRFS, and OS, uni- and multivariable Cox models with time-dependent PPI (the latter adjusted for age, prior chemotherapy, progesterone receptor, grade, tumor stage, nodal stage, body mass index (BMI)) were used. Also, the association between PPI use and neutropenia was investigated in patients initiating PPI prior to randomization vs never. Odds ratios (OR) unadjusted and adjusted for age and BMI estimated with logistic regression models are reported. Results: Of 2840 patients treated with palbociclib + ET, 533 (18.8%) had concomitant PPI and palbociclib intake. Median duration of PPI intake was 10.8 months (interquartile range 2.3-22.3). Most patients received omeprazole as PPI (n=265, 49.7%). PPI intake was significantly associated with older age, post-menopausal status, use of aromatase inhibitors as ET, higher BMI, and worse ECOG status (all p< 0.001). Concomitant PPI intake was not significantly associated with survival outcomes (Table 1). Unadjusted all grade neutropenia rates were slightly lower in patients who initiated PPI prior study start vs patients never initiating (79% vs 85%, unadjusted OR 0.66, 95%CI 0.50-0.88). After adjustment for BMI and age, the difference between the groups decreased (adjusted OR = 0.77, 95%CI 0.57-1.04). Similar effect sizes were found for grade 3/4 neutropenia rates (54% vs 64%, unadjusted OR 0.66, 95%CI 0.52-0.83, adjusted OR 0.81, 95%CI 0.64-1.03). Conclusions: Our exploratory analysis did not demonstrate a statistically significant relationship between concomitant use of PPIs and palbociclib and survival outcomes of patients in the PALLAS trial. Nonetheless, careful consideration of concomitant medications and of drug-drug interactions is important when studying novel agents in the adjuvant breast cancer setting. Support: AFT, Pfizer; https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org Table 1. Association between PPI intake and survival outcomes. Citation Format: Elisa Agostinetto, Georg Pfeiler, Dominik Hlauschek, Erica Mayer, Matteo Lambertini, Evandro de Azambuja, Meritxell Bellet- Ezquerra, Jane Meisel, Gabor Rubovszky, Nicholas Zdenkowski, Yelena Novik, Manuel Ruíz - Borrego, Karen Gelmon, Eleftherios Mamounas, Hiroji Iwata, Dongrui Lu, Lidija Sölkner, Christian Fesl, Michael Gnant, Angela DeMichele. The impact of drug-drug interactions between palbociclib and proton pump inhibitors on clinical outcomes of patients with hormone receptor positive, HER2-negative, early breast cancer: an exploratory analysis of the PALLAS study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO1-01-08.

Proton Pump Inhibitors and Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4/6 Inhibitors in Patients With Breast Cancer.

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) reduce the bioavailability of several anticancer drugs. The impact of PPIs co-administered with cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitors is controversial. We aimed to clarify whether the concomitant use of PPIs impacts palbociclib and abemaciclib effectiveness in breast cancer treatment. This multicenter, retrospective, observational study, conducted across 4 medical institutions in Japan, consecutively included patients with endocrine-resistant metastatic breast cancer, receiving palbociclib or abemaciclib between December 2017 and August 2022. Propensity score-matched analyses were performed. Treatment efficacy and safety with and without PPIs were compared. Progression-free survival and overall survival were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using a log-rank test. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate the hazard ratio. The study included 240 patients. After 1:1 matching, 112 patients were treated with and without PPIs. The median progression-free survival period was 1.2 years in the PPI group and 1.3 years in the non-PPI group (hazard ratio, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.70-2.02). The median overall survival period was 3.6 years in the PPI group, whereas it was not reached in the non-PPI group (hazard ratio, 1.23; 95% CI, 0.61-2.47). Consistent results were obtained for subgroups receiving palbociclib (n = 177) and abemaciclib (n = 63) without propensity score matching. Adverse event incidence and severity were similar in both groups. The effectiveness of cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors is unlikely to be affected by concomitant PPI use. Future prospective pharmacokinetic studies are warranted.

Proton Pump Inhibitors Ameliorate Oxaliplatin-induced Peripheral Neuropathy: Retrospective Analysis of Two Real-world Clinical Databases.

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) due to oxaliplatin (L-OHP) is a major clinical problem. Effective and safe preventive strategies for CIPN are urgently needed. Although proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) have various off-target effects, their clinical impact on L-OHP-induced CIPN remains unclear. In the present study, we investigated the effects of PPIs on L-OHP-induced CIPN in patients using two real-world clinical databases. We retrospectively analyzed the electronic medical records of Osaka University Hospital to examine the effect of PPIs on CIPN development in 217 patients who received XELOX (L-OHP plus capecitabine) therapy for colorectal cancer. In addition, the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report (JADER) database was used to validate the effects of PPIs on L-OHP-induced CIPN. The incidences of CIPN (grade ≥2) and discontinuation of L-OHP were significantly lower in patients with PPIs than in those without PPIs. Multivariate analysis showed that concomitant PPIs use was an independent factor that significantly contributed to the prevention of grade ≥2 CIPN (odds ratio=0.054, p<0.001). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the time to onset of grade ≥2 CIPN was significantly prolonged in patients with PPIs without affecting the therapeutic efficacy of L-OHP (p=0.004). Moreover, JADER database analyses revealed that the reporting odds ratio of any PPI for L-OHP-induced CIPN was 0.485. Concomitant PPI use ameliorated L-OHP-induced CIPN in patients with colorectal cancer.

Effect of Concomitant Use of Proton Pump Inhibitors on Immunotherapy Clinical Response in Advanced Cancer Patients: Real-Life Setting.

The alteration of the gut microbiota mediated by proton pump inhibitor (PPI) drugs could be involved in the clinical response associated with immunotherapy [immunocheckpoint inhibitors (ICIs)] in cancer patients. Due to the current controversy in the scientific evidence, it has been proposed to evaluate the correlation between the concomitant use of PPIs and the effectiveness of immunotherapy in a real clinical practice setting. Single-center retrospective cohort study that included patients treated with anti-PD-1 or anti-CTLA4, including nivolumab, pembrolizumab, atezolizumab, or the combination ipilimumab-nivolumab in metastatic neoplastic disease. The clinical effectiveness of ICI, measured in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), was compared between the PPI-use versus PPI-no-use group. PPI-use group was associated with lower PFS [hazard ratio (HR):1.89 (1.38-2.59), P<0.001] and OS [HR: 2.02 (1.45-2.82), P<0.001] versus PPI-no-use group. However, this difference was not observed for pembrolizumab PFS [HR: 1.38 (0.93-2.39), P=0.160] and OS [HR: 1.41 (0.81-2.44), P=0.187]. The study showed significantly lower PFS and OS in the chronic PPI-use group (P<0.001), recent PPI-use group (P<0.001) and concomitant PPI-use group (P=0.001, 0.007) versus PPI-no-use group. However, late PPI use >30 days after the onset of ICI has no significant effect on the efficacy of treatment [HR: 0.92 (0.49-1.70), P=0.791; HR: 1.10 (0.59-2.05), P=0.756]. The concomitant use of PPIs in immunotherapy is associated with worse clinical outcomes compared with the group without PPI use. In addition, the study shows how the late use of PPIs does not have a significant effect on clinical benefit.

The Association between Proton Pump Inhibitors and the Effectiveness of CDK Inhibitors in HR+/HER- Advanced Breast Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

There have been many clinical questions regarding whether the use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) could deteriorate the effects of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors (CDKIs) in HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer patients. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of this clinical question, including studies enrolling HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer patients treated with CDKIs (Palbociclib or Ribociclib) and reporting at least one comparative survival outcome, either overall survival (OS) or progression-free survival (PFS), between concomitant PPI users and non-users. Eight studies met the eligibility criteria, with a total of 2584 patients included (PPI users: 830, PPI non-users: 1754), demonstrating that concomitant PPI use was associated with significantly higher risks of all-cause mortality (HR = 2.03; 95% CI, 1.49 to 2.77; I2 = 0%) and disease progression (HR = 1.75; 95% CI, 1.26 to 2.43; I2 = 59%) in breast cancer patients taking Palbociclib. In contrast, there were no significant survival impacts of PPIs on Ribociclib (HR = 1.46; 95% CI, 0.91 to 2.34; I2 = 36%). Additionally, there was no significant difference in the risk associated with CDKI dose reduction due to drug toxicity (RR = 1.12; 95% CI, 0.97 to 1.29). Therefore, when HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer patients require the use of PPIs, it may be reasonable to consider using Ribociclib.

Use of concomitant proton pump inhibitors, statins or metformin in patients treated with pembrolizumab for metastatic urothelial carcinoma: data from the ARON-2 retrospective study.

Concomitant medications may potentially affect the outcome of cancer patients. In this sub-analysis of the ARON-2 real-world study (NCT05290038), we aimed to assess the impact of concomitant use of proton pump inhibitors (PPI), statins, or metformin on outcome of patients with metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC) receiving second-line pembrolizumab. We collected data from the hospital medical records of patients with mUC treated with pembrolizumab as second-line therapy at 87 institutions from 22 countries. Patients were assessed for overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall response rate. We carried out a survival analysis by a Cox regression model. A total of 802 patients were eligible for this retrospective study; the median follow-up time was 15.3months. PPI users compared to non-users showed inferior PFS (4.5 vs. 7.2months, p = 0.002) and OS (8.7 vs. 14.1months, p < 0.001). Concomitant PPI use remained a significant predictor of PFS and OS after multivariate Cox analysis. The use of statins or metformin was not associated with response or survival. Our study results suggest a significant prognostic impact of concomitant PPI use in mUC patients receiving pembrolizumab in the real-world context. The mechanism of this interaction warrants further elucidation.

Impact of Concomitant Use of Proton Pump Inhibitors and Clopidogrel on Recurrent Stroke and Myocardial Infarction.

Conflicting results have been reported regarding the interaction between proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and clopidogrel. We investigated whether concomitant PPI use influenced the risk of recurrence in patients with stroke and myocardial infarction (MI). This study used two databases for two different designs, the Korean National Health Insurance Service (NHIS) database for a self-controlled case series design, and the national sample cohort of the NHIS data base converted to the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership-Common Data Model version for a cohort study based on large-scale propensity score matching. In the PPI co-prescription group, recurrent hospitalization with stroke occurred in 17.6% of the 8201 patients with history of stroke, and recurrent MI occurred in 17.1% of the 1216 patients with history of MI within1 year. According to the self-controlled case series, the overall relative risk (RR) of recurrent stroke was 2.09 (95% confidence interval (CI); 1.83-2.38); the RR showed an increasing trend parallel to the time from the beginning of PPI co-prescription. In the cohort study, there was a higher incidence of recurrent stroke in the PPI co-prescription group (Hazard ratio (HR): 1.34, 95% CI: 1.01-1.76, p = 0.04). The overall RR of recurrent MI was 1.47 (95% CI; 1.02-2.11) in the self-controlled case series; however, there was no statistically significant difference in recurrent MI in the cohort study (HR:1.42, 95% CI:0.79-2.49, p = 0.23). The impact of individual PPIs on stroke and MI showed different patterns. A PPI co-prescription >4 weeks with clopidogrel was associated with hospitalization of recurrent stroke within 1 year of initial diagnosis; however, its association with recurrent MI remains inconclusive. The influence of individual PPIs should be clarified in the future.

Concomitant Use of Proton Pump Inhibitors and Palbociclib Among Patients With Breast Cancer

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are commonly used drugs to relieve gastrointestinal tract symptoms, but their acid-inhibitory action negatively affects the bioavailability and clinical outcomes of orally administered concomitant drugs. To identify the clinical outcomes of patients with advanced breast cancer who concomitantly use PPIs and palbociclib. This retrospective cohort study used nationwide claims data between November 1, 2016, and July 31, 2021, in South Korea. Patients with breast cancer receiving palbociclib between November 1, 2017, and July 31, 2020, were identified. Patients whose prescriptions for palbociclib and PPI overlapped by at least 33% were classified into a concomitant PPI group. Patients who never received PPI during the palbociclib treatment period were classified into a nonconcomitant PPI group. Patients were selected through 1:3 propensity score matching for analyses. Concomitant use of PPIs with palbociclib. Time to progression and death. These outcomes were presented as progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) and were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) of concomitant PPI use associated with clinical PFS and/or OS. A total of 344 women were included in the concomitant PPI group and 966 in the nonconcomitant PPI group. Among 1310 patients identified after matching, 1108 (84.6%) were older than 50 years; 1111 (84.8%) were treated with letrozole and anastrozole (endocrine sensitive); and 199 (15.2%) were treated with fulvestrant (endocrine resistant). The median clinical PFS in the concomitant PPI group was shorter than that of the nonconcomitant PPI group (25.3 [95% CI, 19.6-33.0] vs 39.8 [95% CI, 34.9 to not applicable] months; P < .001), and the HR was 1.76 (95% CI, 1.46-2.13). Concomitant use of PPI was also associated with shorter OS (HR, 2.71 [95% CI, 2.07-3.53]). Both clinical PFS and OS in the concomitant PPI group were consistently poor in patients receiving endocrine-sensitive and endocrine-resistant treatment. These findings suggest that concomitant use of PPIs with palbociclib may hinder the complete therapeutic benefits of palbociclib in patients with breast cancer.

Association between concomitant proton pump inhibitor use and survival of patients with metastatic prostate cancer receiving abiraterone acetate: a post-hoc analysis of pooled data from three randomized controlled trials.

Evidence suggests proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use may attenuate the effect of abiraterone acetate plus prednisone (AAP) in metastatic prostate cancer via the modification of gut microbiota. This study aimed to examine whether concomitant PPI use is associated with survival in patients with metastatic prostate cancer treated with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and AAP. Post-hoc analysis was conducted in patients with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) and metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) treated in the LATITUDE, COU-AA-301, and COU-AA-302 trials (ADT vs. ADT plus AAP). PPI users and non-users were compared for restricted mean overall survival time (RMOST) and restricted mean progression-free survival time (RMPFST) based on inverse probability of treatment weight (IPTW)-adjusted Kaplan-Meier curves. IPTW-adjusted Cox regression models were used to assess heterogeneity of treatment effect. In patients treated with AAP, PPI use was associated with inferior RMOST [difference (95% confidence interval): -4.2 (-7.0 to -1.4)] and RMPFST [-3.5 (-6.6 to -0.4)] compared with non-users. However, RMOST and RMPFST were similar between PPI users and non-users in patients treated with ADT alone [RMOST, -2.6 (-5.8 to 0.6); RMPFST, -1.7 (-4.8 to 1.4)]. Interaction term analyses did not show evidence of heterogeneity in treatment effect between AAP and ADT, despite the prominent treatment effect shown in mCSPC vs. mCRPC. PPI use may be associated with inferior survival in patients with metastatic prostate cancer who receive ADT plus AAP. Discontinuing unnecessary PPI use might improve those outcomes.

Model Based Estimation of Posaconazole Tablet and Suspension Bioavailability in Hospitalized Children Using Real-World Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Data in Patients Receiving Intravenous and Oral Dosing.

Invasive fungal infections are a major cause of morbidity and mortality for immunocompromised patients. Posaconazole is approved for treatment and prophylaxis of invasive fungal infection in adult patients, with intravenous, oral suspension, and gastroresistant/delayed-released tablet formulations available. In Europe, until very recently, posaconazole was used off-label in children, although a new delayed-release suspension approved for pediatric use is expected to become available soon. A population pharmacokinetic model was developed which uses posaconazole therapeutic drug monitoring data following intravenous and oral dosing in hospitalized children, thus enabling estimation of pediatric suspension and tablet oral bioavailability. In total, 297 therapeutic drug monitoring plasma levels from 104 children were included in this analysis. The final model was a one-compartment model with first-order absorption and nonlinear elimination. Allometric scaling on clearance and volume of distribution was included a priori. Tablet bioavailability was estimated to be 66%. Suspension bioavailability was estimated to decrease with increasing doses, ranging from 3.8% to 32.2% in this study population. Additionally, concomitant use of proton pump-inhibitors was detected as a significant covariate, reducing suspension bioavailability by 41.0%. This is the first population pharmacokinetic study to model posaconazole data from hospitalized children following intravenous, tablet, and suspension dosing simultaneously. The incorporation of saturable posaconazole clearance into the model has been key to the credible joint estimation of tablet and suspension bioavailability. To aid rational posaconazole dosing in children, this model was used alongside published pharmacodynamic targets to predict the probability of target attainment using typical pediatric dosing regimen.

The effect of concomitant proton pump inhibitor use on survival outcomes of Nivolumab-treated renal cell carcinoma patients: a multicenter study.

We aimed to evaluate the effect of concomitant proton pump inhibitors (PPI) use with nivolumab on survival outcomes in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) in second-line setting. The study was designed as a multicenter and retrospective involving patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma receiving second-line nivolumab therapy. One hundred and nine patients with mRCC were divided into two groups based on whether they use PPI concomitantly with nivolumab: concomitant PPI users and non-users. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were compared between the groups with and without concurrent PPIs. Of 109 patients in our study, 59 were not using PPI concomitantly with nivolumab and 50 were using PPI concomitantly. The median PFS was 6.37 (5.2-7.5) months in the concomitant PPI group and 9.7 (4.5-15) months in the non-users (p = 0.03). The median OS was 14.6 (7.1-22.1) months in patients on PPI concurrently with nivolumab and 29.9 (17.1-42.7) months in the non-users (p = 0.01). Accordingly, PPI use for PFS (Non-use vs. Use = HR: 0.44, 95%Cl 0.28-0.96, p = 0.014) and PPI use for OS (Non-use vs. Use = HR: 0.68, 95%Cl 0.22-0.88, p = 0.01) were found to be as independent risk factors. Concomitant use of PPIs is associated with worse survival outcomes in patients with mRCC treated with nivolumab. Clinicians should carefully consider the concomitant use of PPIs in such patients.

243P Concomitant administration of palbociclib and proton pump inhibitors affects clinical outcomes in metastatic breast cancer patients

Cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors are usually combined with fulvestrant or aromatase inhibitors for the treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer (mBC). Drug-drug interactions may affect absorption by different mechanims, for instance, modification of digestive pH. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are known to reduce the oral bioavailability of some anticancer drugs. Palbociclib is a weak base with pH-dependent solubility, therefore variations in gastric pH could affect its absorption. The objective of this study was to evaluate the interaction between PPIs and palbociclib by analizing progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with mBC. This is a retrospective study approved by the local Ethics Committee. Patients had received palbociclib between January 2016 and December 2021. The following variables were collected: age, menopausal status, performance status, hormonal treatment (fulvestrant or aromatase inhibitors), visceral or non-visceral disease, first-line vs second-line treatment, ki67, and concomitant use of PPIs. PFS was defined as the time from starting treatment to progression of the disease. Survival was estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method, whereas Cox Regression models were used to estimate hazard ratios and the chi-square test for categorical variables. A total of 169 patients were enrolled in the study: 80 received a PPI and 86 did not, without significant differences in clinical characteristics in both groups. The median PFS was 17.3 months (95% CI: 13.83-20.76), 36 months in first-line and 13 months in second and subsequent lines. Patients taking PPIs had a shorter median PFS (14.30 versus 42.6 months, p<0.001; HR 4.18: 95% CI 2.57-6.80; p<0.0001). Median PFS was 44 vs. 14 months in first-line ans 17 vs 9 months in second or subsequent lines. The line of treatment (first vs second or beyond) and ki67 had a significant influence on DFS, whereas the remaining clinical variables did not. Patients with mBC treated with hormonal therapy plus palbociclib had poor PFS when receving a concomitant PPI. Although further studies are needed in the field, caution is recommended with the long-term use of PPIs in this population.

Proton pump inhibitors increase the risk of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-related small bowel injury: A Systematic Review with Meta-analysis.

Conflicting results exist on the association between proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID)-related small bowel damage. Aims: To determine whether PPIs increased the risk of NSAID-related small bowel damage by meta-analysis. Methods: A systematic electronic search in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science was conducted from the time the database was created until 31 March 2022 for studies reporting associations between PPI use and outcomes, including the endoscopy-verified prevalence of small bowel injury, mean number of small bowel injuries per patient, change in hemoglobin level, and risk of small bowel bleeding in subjects taking NSAIDs. Meta-analytical calculations for odds ratio (OR) and mean difference (MD) were performed with the random-effects model and interpreted with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: Fourteen studies comprising 1996 subjects were included. Pooled analysis demonstrated that concomitant use of PPIs significantly increased the prevalence and number of endoscopy-verified small bowel injuries (prevalence: OR=3.00; 95% CI: 1.74-5.16; number: MD=2.30; 95% CI: 0.61-3.99) and decreased hemoglobin levels (MD=-0.50 g/dL; 95% CI: -0.88 to -0.12) in NSAID users but did not change the risk of small bowel bleeding (OR=1.24; 95% CI: 0.80-1.92). Subgroup analysis demonstrated that PPIs significantly increased the prevalence of small bowel injury in subjects taking nonselective NSAIDs (OR=7.05; 95% CI: 4.70-10.59, 4 studies, I2=0) and COX-2 inhibitors (OR=4.00; 95% CI: 1.18-13.60, 1 study, no calculated I2) when compared to COX-2 inhibitors alone.Conclusion: PPIs increased the risk of NSAID-related small bowel damage, and the clinical significance of higher prevalence of small bowel injuries should be studied in future.

Clinical impact of tetracyclines and/or proton pump inhibitors on the efficacy of epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer: a retrospective cohort study

BackgroundThis retrospective cohort study examined the impact of tetracyclines (TCs) and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) alone or in combination on the efficacy of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).MethodsPatients with NSCLC treated with gefitinib or erlotinib for at least 1 week between January 2009 and October 2021 were enrolled and divided into four groups based on the presence/absence of TC and/or PPI in the therapeutic regimen: TC-/PPI-, TC + /PPI-, TC-/PPI + , TC + /PPI + . Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were the primary and secondary endpoints, respectively.ResultsThe estimated median PFS and OS of 347 included patients with NSCLC were 8.57 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 7.66–9.48) months and 13.10 (95% CI: 11.03–15.17) months, respectively. Co-administration of EGFR-TKIs with PPIs decreased the PFS and OS, while that with TCs improved the PFS and OS. However, the concomitant use of EGFR-TKIs, TCs, and PPIs yielded survival rates similar to that of EGFR-TKI therapy alone.ConclusionsThe administration of EGFR-TKIs with other drugs poses a challenge in managing patients with NSCLC. Therefore, reassessing the indications and necessity of TC or PPI therapy is essential for patients receiving erlotinib or gefitinib. The benefits and risks of possible discontinuation due to the clinical relevance of this interaction should be considered.

Differential impact of proton pump inhibitor on survival outcomes of patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma treated with chemotherapy versus pembrolizumab.

We clarified the effect of concomitant proton pump inhibitor use on oncological outcomes in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma treated either with chemotherapy or immune checkpoint inhibitor. We retrospectively reviewed patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma who received paclitaxel-gemcitabine therapy or pembrolizumab after platinum-based chemotherapy. The patients were divided into four groups based on the treatment regimen and the concomitant use of proton pump inhibitor. We compared survival outcomes between the groups and determined which factors predicted overall survival. Among the 60 and 75 patients treated with paclitaxel-gemcitabine and pembrolizumab, 15 and 29 used a concomitant proton pump inhibitor. Progression-free and overall survival was significantly shorter in patients who were administered pembrolizumab with concomitant proton pump inhibitor compared to those without. The use of a concomitant proton pump inhibitor had no effect on survival outcomes in patients who received paclitaxel-gemcitabine therapy. Furthermore, progression-free and overall survival were significantly shorter in patients treated with paclitaxel-gemcitabine therapy compared to those treated with pembrolizumab among patients without concomitant proton pump inhibitor. In contrast, there was no difference in survival outcomes between the two regimens among patients with concomitant proton pump inhibitor. Concomitant proton pump inhibitor use was associated with poor overall survival only in patients treated with pembrolizumab. The use of a concomitant proton pump inhibitor use had no impact on oncological outcomes in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma treated with paclitaxel-gemcitabine therapy, different from those treated with pembrolizumab.

The Impact of Concomitant Proton Pump Inhibitors on Immunotherapy Efficacy among Patients with Urothelial Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis.

Background. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have recently represented a breakthrough in urothelial carcinoma (UC). Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are routinely used for extended time periods in UC patients, with these agents having potentially and frequently undervalued effects on ICIs efficacy. Methods. We performed a meta-analysis aimed at investigating the impact of concomitant PPI administration on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) among patients receiving immunotherapy for metastatic UC. Results. Two studies encompassing a total of 1015 patients were included. The pooled Hazard Ratios (HRs) for OS and PFS were 1.55 (95% CI, 1.31–1.84) and 1.43 (95% CI, 1.23–1.66), respectively, suggesting that the administration of PPIs was negatively associated with PFS and with OS in UC patients treated with ICIs. Conclusions. The current meta-analysis represents the first study to provide a systematic evaluation of the impact of concomitant PPI use in UC patients treated with ICIs. Further studies are warranted on this topic to clarify the relationship between gut microbiome, antiacid exposure, and cancer immunotherapy. In the current era of medical oncology, progress in this setting will require the collaboration of basic science and clinical research to optimize systemic treatment and to improve the outcomes of UC patients receiving ICIs.

Impact of proton pump inhibitors on sustained virologic response in veterans treated with sofosbuvir/velpatasvir for chronic hepatitis C virus: A retrospective cohort study.

The objective of this study was to determine the clinical relationship between proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use and sustained virologic response (SVR) in patients treated with sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (SOF/VEL) for chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. This was a multicenter retrospective cohort study. Data was collected on patients from 128 Veterans Affairs Medical Centers throughout the United States. This study included veterans aged 18-89 years with viremic HCV who received a full course of SOF/VEL treatment from June 2016 - July 2017. Sustained viral response was compared in patients taking SOF/VEL with or without concurrent PPI prescriptions. Analysis of the primary outcome was completed utilizing logistic regression. The relationship between SVR and PPI use was adjusted for African-American race, presence of cirrhosis, prior treatment, BMI greater than 30 kg/m2, and HCV genotype. The final analysis included 4,008 veterans, 830 with concomitant PPI use and 3,178 without PPI use. After adjustment for other variables in the logistic model, there was no statistically significant association between PPI use and lower SVR (odds ratio 0.67; 95%CI: 0.42, 1.06; p=0.087). Concomitant PPI treatment adjusted for other variables did not significantly impact success or failure of SOF/VEL treatment of chronic HCV. Despite the lack of significant association identified in this study, in efforts to provide the best care possible, it remains prudent to proceed with caution in patients desiring to use PPI therapy while receiving SOF/VEL, and ensure prescribing instructions are closely followed in regard to concomitant PPI use, especially in patients with other risk factors for decreased SVR.

Proton Pump Inhibitors Ameliorate Capecitabine-induced Hand-Foot Syndrome in Patients With Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Study

Hand-foot syndrome (HFS) is the most common adverse event associated with capecitabine, and its pathogenesis is known to be associated with inflammation. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) reportedly exert anti-inflammatory effects; however, the impact of PPIs on capecitabine-induced HFS needs to be clarified in the clinical setting. In the present study, we retrospectively investigated the efficacy and safety of PPIs in patients with breast cancer receiving capecitabine. We analyzed the effects of PPIs on the development of severe HFS (grade ≥2), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) in 195 patients who received capecitabine chemotherapy for breast cancer. In total, 50 patients (26%) were treated with PPIs, while 145 patients (74%) did not receive PPIs. The incidence of severe HFS was significantly lower in patients who received PPIs (18%) than in patients who did not receive PPIs (43%, p=0.001), and the discontinuation rate of capecitabine therapy due to HFS was also lower in patients receiving PPIs than in those who did not receive PPIs (p=0.003). Multivariate analysis revealed that concomitant PPIs use was an independent factor that significantly contributed to the prevention of severe HFS (odds ratio (OR)=0.265, p=0.003). Meanwhile, no significant difference in median PFS and OS values was observed between patients treated with and without PPIs. Concomitant use of PPIs could ameliorate capecitabine-induced HFS in patients with breast cancer.

Clinical outcomes of concomitant use of proton pump inhibitors and regorafenib in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: A multicenter study.

130 Background: Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) are the most common oral drugs in cancer patients. Similarly, proton pump inhibitors (PPI) are commonly used to relieve dyspeptic symptoms in patients with cancer. However, gastric pH levels may affect the absorption of TKI through the gastrointestinal system. However, all TKIs do not have the same chemical structure, and the absorption rate of each TKI depends on their solubility in different gastric pH levels. Limited data is available about the clinical outcomes of concomitant use of PPI and regorafenib in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). We present here the results of the multicenter study following the initial results of our single-center experience. Methods: Patients with mCRC treated with regorafenib were included in this multicenter and retrospective study. Patients prescribed PPI after initiation of regorafenib were assigned to the PPI user group, and the remaining patients were assigned to the PPI non-user group. To exclude immortal time bias, the log-rank test was performed between PPI non-user and all patients. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS), and secondary outcomes were time to treatment failure (TTF) and adverse events (AEs) profile. Results: Two hundred and seventy-two patients from eight cancer centers were included in this study. Most patients were male (59.9%), had liver metastasis (62.1%), and received regorafenib in the third line (52.2%). The median age at the initiation of regorafenib was 60 years (interquartile range (IQR): 51-66)). Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score was 0 or 1 in approximately three out of four patients. The rate of patients with K-RAS mutation was 46.7%. There were 131 (48.2%) and 141 (51.8%) in the PPI user and non-user groups, respectively. The most prescribed PPI was pantoprazole (40.4%). At a median 34.2 months follow-up, the median OS was 6.9 months (95% Confidence Interval (CI): 5.3-8.5) and 7.7 months (95% CI:6.6-8.8) in the PPI non-user and all patients, respectively. No statistical significance was observed between the groups (p = 0.913). The median TTF was 3.3 months (95% CI: 2.6-3.9) and 3.4 months (95% CI:2.9-4.0) in the PPI non-user and all patients, respectively. No statistical significance was observed between the groups (p = 0.651). In the time-dependent covariate Cox regression model, there was no difference between PPI user and non-user groups in OS and TTF (adjusted Hazard Ratio (aHR):0.96, 95% CI:0.74-1.24, p = 0.735 for OS; aHR:0.88, 0.68-1.14, p = 0.354 for TTF). The rates of all AEs were also similar in the PPI user and non-user groups (p = 0.628). Conclusions: To our knowledge, this was the first study evaluating the effect of concomitant use of PPI and regorafenib in patients with mCRC, and no adverse survival and safety outcome was observed with the concomitant use of PPI and regorafenib in those patients.