Concomitant Systematic Biopsy Research Articles

Füzyon Biyopsi Sonrası Prostat Kanseri Saptanan Hastalarda Biyopsi Sonrası Patoloji ile Radikal Prostatektomi Sonrası Patolojinin Karşılaştırılması

Aims: To compare the post-radical prostatectomy (RP) final pathologies and post-biopsy pathologies of the patients diagnosed with prostate cancer (PCa) after fusion biopsy according to the International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grading system. Material and Methods: In this retrospective study, data of 182 patients who underwent fusion biopsy and concomitant systematic biopsy between January 2020 and August 2022 was reviewed. All these patients were biopsy naive with PIRADS-3 lesions according to the multiparametric MRI (mp-MRI) imaging. A total of 89 patients with PCa detected by biopsy were included in the study. Age, PSA, PSA density, and lesion grades according to PI-RADS were analysed. The post-biopsy (fusion and systematic biopsy) pathology results of 60 patients who underwent RP were compared with the final pathology results after RP. Results: Pathological results after fusion biopsy and RP were compared. The individual agreement between RP and fusion biopsy for each ISUP grade was moderate to almost excellent (0.558 to 0.848). When the overall agreement between RP and fusion biopsy was evaluated, the weighted kappa was calculated as 0.721 (95% CI: 0.577 to 0.865), which was determined as substantial significant agreement. On the other hand, the overall agreement between systematic biopsy and pathology results after RP was calculated as weighted kappa 0.544 (95% CI: 0.405 to 0.683) and this agreement was determined as moderate agreement. Conclusion: Our study showed that the concordance between the pathology result after fusion biopsy and the final pathology after RP was higher than the standard TRUS prostate biopsy. We think this compliance is crucial in the regulation and follow-up of the treatment of the patients.

Do Concomitant Systematic Biopsies Add to Fusion Targeted Biopsies in the Diagnosis and Management of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer?

Magnetic resonance imaging targeted biopsy clearly detects more clinically significant prostate cancer than systematic biopsy. Whether concomitant systematic biopsy adds to targeted biopsy in the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer remains uncertain. The primary outcome measure of this study was to ascertain the percentage of clinically significant prostate cancer on systematic biopsy missed by targeted biopsy. Furthermore, we sought to determine whether systematic biopsy results influenced the clinical management of patients. This prospective observational study included all men undergoing Fusion targeted biopsy in our Health Board. All men had PI-RADS scores of 3-5 on magnetic resonance imaging. Histology from targeted biopsy and systematic biopsy was reviewed to determine any additional benefit of performing systematic biopsy. Clinical outcomes were also reviewed. Clinically significant prostate cancer was defined by (i) International Society of Urological Pathology ≥ 2 and (ii) UCL criteria of any primary Gleason 4 or core length ≥ 6 mm. A total of 104 men were included in the study of whom 18 patients were biopsy naïve, 65 had at least 1 previous negative biopsy, and 20 had previous biopsies that showed clinically insignificant cancer. The percentage of clinically significant prostate cancer missed on targeted biopsy was between 9.1% and 11.1%. Moreover, 17.1% of patients with clinically significant prostate cancer would not have proceeded to radical treatment if the systematic biopsy had not been performed. Our data support a growing field of evidence that although magnetic resonance imaging targeted biopsy is more sensitive than systematic biopsy at detecting clinically significant prostate cancer, systematic biopsy adds to the number of patients diagnosed with clinically significant prostate cancer in those already undergoing prostate biopsy.

MP67-06 OUTCOMES OF PROSTATE CANCER PATIENTS WITH SEMINAL VESICLE INVASION AT MULTIPARAMETRIC MRI MANAGED WITH RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY. DO ALL PATIENTS REALLY NEED A MULTI-MODAL APPROACH?

MP67-06 OUTCOMES OF PROSTATE CANCER PATIENTS WITH SEMINAL VESICLE INVASION AT MULTIPARAMETRIC MRI MANAGED WITH RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY. DO ALL PATIENTS REALLY NEED A MULTI-MODAL APPROACH?

Prostate tumor volume is a significant predictor to identify patients with no need for concomitant systematic biopsy in men undergoing transrectal ultrasound- MRI fusion guided biopsy of the prostate

Prostate tumor volume is a significant predictor to identify patients with no need for concomitant systematic biopsy in men undergoing transrectal ultrasound- MRI fusion guided biopsy of the prostate

Risk and predictors of adverse pathology after radical prostatectomy in patients diagnosed with IUSP 1–2 prostate cancer at MRI-targeted biopsy: a multicenter analysis

PurposeAlthough active surveillance (AS) is recommended for low- to favorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer (PCa), risk of upgrading at radical prostatectomy (RP) is not negligible. Available studies based on systematic transrectal ultrasound biopsy might not be applicable to contemporary cohorts diagnosed with MRI-targeted biopsy (TB). The aim of the present study is to explore rates and risk factors for adverse outcomes (AO) at RP in patients with ISUP ≤ 2 PCa detected at TB with concomitant systematic biopsy (SB).MethodsMulticenter, retrospective analysis of 475 consecutive patients with ISUP ≤ 2 PCa at MRI-TB + SB is treated with RP. AO were defined as ISUP upgrading, adverse pathology (upgrading to ISUP ≥ 3 and/or ≥ pT3 at RP, and/or pN1) (AP) or biochemical recurrence (BCR) in men with follow-up (n = 327).ResultsThe rate of ISUP upgrading, upgrading ≥ 3, and AP were 39%, 21%, and 43%. Compared to ISUP2, men with ISUP1 PCa had a higher rate of overall upgrading (27 vs. 67%, p < 0.001), but less upgrading to ≥ 3 (27 vs. 10%, p < 0.001). AP was more common when ISUP2 was detected with a combined MRI-TB + SB approach compared to considering TB (p = 0.02) or SB (p = 0.01) alone. PSA, PSA density, PI-RADS, ISUP at TB, overall biopsy ISUP and EAU classification were predictors of upgrading to ISUP ≥ 3 and AP. The 1 year BCR-free survival was 94% with no differences in BCR rates between subgroups.ConclusionUpgrading in ISUP ≤ 2 PCa remains prevalent even in men diagnosed in the MRI era. The use of MRI-TB with concomitant SB allows for the accurate identification of ISUP2 PCa and predicts the risk of AO at RP.

Does previous prostate surgery affect multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging accuracy in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer? Results from a single institution series.

Multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) has demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy for clinically significant PCa (csPCa). However, the accuracy of this test in men that received a previous prostatic surgery is still controversial. We aimed at assessing the effect of previous prostatic surgery on the detection of csPCa in a tertiary referral center. We relied on a cohort of 311 men with a positive mpMRI (prostate imaging - reporting and data system [PI-RADS] ≥ 3) who underwent a targeted (TBx) plus concomitant systematic random biopsy (SBx) at a single tertiary referral center between 2017 and 2020. The study outcome was to compare the detection of csPCa (Gleason score ≥ 3 + 4) between the two groups (no previous prostate surgery [Group 1] vs. previous prostate surgery [Group 2]). Multivariable logistic regression analysis (MVA) was used to assess the relationship between previous prostate surgery and the detection of csPCa at TBx, after taking into account potential clinical confounders. Overall, 24 (8%) patients received a previous prostate surgery before undergoing mpMRI. Median prostate-specific antigen density was 0.15 versus 0.08 ng/ml/cc, in Group 1 versus 2, respectively. The most frequent finding at mpMRI was in Group 1 versus 2, PI-RADS 4 (55%) versus PI-RADS 3 and 4 (42% each). The majority of patients were biopsy naïve in both Groups 1 (66%) and 2 (71%). The overall detection of csPCa in Group 1 versus 2 was 83% versus 75%, respectively. Differently, the detection of csPCa at TBx in Groups 1 versus 2 was 76% versus 71%, respectively. At MVA, previous prostate surgery (odds ratio: 0.65; p = 0.02) was significantly associated with lower csPCa detection at TBx, after accounting for potential confounders. The presence of previous prostate surgery significantly decreases the accuracy of mpMRI in detecting csPCa. These results should be taken into account when assessing patients with a history of prostatic surgery and a suspicious lesion at mpMRI, to better select those who might avoid an unnecessary biopsy.

Diagnosing Prostate Cancer: The Role of Intravesical Prostatic Gland Protrusion on Accuracy of Prostate Biopsies.

We evaluated the association between intravesical prostate protrusion (IPP) and the detection rate of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) fusion targeted biopsy (TB). A total of 538 consecutive men who underwent MRI-TRUS fusion TB and concomitant systematic biopsy were evaluated. IPP on MRI was independently measured by 4 blinded reviewers. The primary outcome was per-lesion detection of csPCa on TB. We assessed the association between IPP and csPCa detection on TB, controlling for age, prostate specific antigen, Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System® (PI-RADS®) score, prostate volume, targeted cores sampled and previous biopsy experience. A total of 847 PI-RADS 3 or greater lesions were targeted across 570 biopsies. Intra- and interrater reliability for measuring IPP was strong. A total of 81 (14.2%), 127 (22.3%), 237 (41.6%) and 125 (21.9%) men had 0, small, medium and large IPP, respectively. A total of 230, 392 and 196 lesions were PI-RADS 3, 4 and 5, respectively. Of the lesions 198 (34.7%) had csPCa on TB. The overall relationship between IPP size and csPCa found on TB was not significant; however, large IPP is associated with a significantly lower rate of csPCa detection than 0 IPP (p=0.007). Every mm increase in IPP is associated with a 5.6% decrease in the odds of csPCa detection on TB (p=0.004) and a 66.5% decrease in odds of detection in large IPP compared to 0 IPP (p=0.003). As the size of the IPP and volume increase, there is a decrease in the detection rate of csPCa on MRI-guided TB. These findings may be driven by poor MRI-TRUS co-registration and prostate asymmetry.

MP05-12 SHOULD WE ROUTINELY RECOMMEND A CENTRAL REVIEW OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING OF THE PROSTATE IN MEN WITH POSITIVE MP-MRI? IMPLICATION FOR TARGETED BIOPSIES

MP05-12 SHOULD WE ROUTINELY RECOMMEND A CENTRAL REVIEW OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING OF THE PROSTATE IN MEN WITH POSITIVE MP-MRI? IMPLICATION FOR TARGETED BIOPSIES

The prognostic value of high-grade prostate cancer pattern on MRI-targeted biopsies: predictors for downgrading and importance of concomitant systematic biopsies

To assess the proportion and risk factors for downgrading and reclassification to favorable disease in patients having high-grade (HG) prostate cancer (PCa) pattern on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-targeted-biopsy (TB). From a radical prostatectomy (RP) cohort, we included patients with pre-biopsy positive MRI and HG [defined by Grade Group (GG) ≥ 3] PCa on MRI-TB. All patients also underwent concomitant systematic biopsy (SB). The main endpoints were the rates of downgrading to GG2, overall downgrading, favorable disease (pT2 and GG2) on RP specimens, and biochemical recurrence-free-survival (RFS). We studied the correlations between HG on concomitant SB, final pathological outcomes and biochemical RFS curves. Overall downgrading, downgrading to GG2 disease and favorable disease were noted in 36.2%, 24.1%, and 15.4% respectively. HG on concomitant SB was correlated with pT3-4 disease (p < 0.001), pN1 disease (p < 0.001), positive surgical margins (p = 0.043), PSA recurrence (p = 0.003). In multivariable analysis, the presence of GG4-5 on TB (p = 0.013; OR 0.263) and the presence of HG on concomitant SB (p = 0.010; OR 0.269) were negatively and independently correlated with the risk of downgrading to GG2. The presence of HG on concomitant SB independently predicted RFS with a hazard ratio of 2.173 (p = 0.049; 95% CI 1.005-4.697). Our data shows that a limited HG restricted to TB can often be associated with a favorable grade in almost a quarter of the cases and downgraded in almost half of the cases. Detailed SB features, mainly the presence of HG on concomitant SB, was associated with a more accurate pathology and oncologic outcomes prediction, pleading for the maintenance of SB in MRI-positive patients.

External Validation of a Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging–based Nomogram for the Prediction of Extracapsular Extension and Seminal Vesicle Invasion in Prostate Cancer Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy

The nomogram reported by Gandaglia et al (The key combined value of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging, and magnetic resonance imaging-targeted and concomitant systematic biopsies for the prediction of adverse pathological features in prostate cancer patients undergoing radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2020;77:733–41) predicting extracapsular extension (ECE) or seminal vesicle invasion (SVI) has been developed using multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) parameters and MRI-targeted biopsy. We aimed to validate this nomogram externally by analyzing 566 patients harboring prostate cancer diagnosed on MRI-targeted biopsy followed by radical prostatectomy. At final pathology, 37% and 12% patients had ECE and SVI, respectively. Performance of the nomogram, in comparison with the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) model and Partin tables, was evaluated using discrimination, calibration, and decision curve analysis. Regarding ECE prediction, the nomogram showed higher discrimination (71.8% vs 69.8%, p = 0.3 and 71.8% vs 61.3%, p < 0.001), and similar miscalibration and net benefit for probability threshold above 30% when compared with MSKCC model and Partin tables, respectively. Performance of the nomogram with regard to SVI was comparable in terms of discrimination (68.5% vs 70.4% vs 67.8%, p ≥ 0.6), presenting a slight overestimation on calibration plots and a net benefit for probability threshold above 7.5%. This is the first multicentric study that externally validates a nomogram predicting ECE and SVI in patients diagnosed with MRI-targeted biopsy. Its performance was less optimistic than expected, and implementation of MRI in this setting was not associated with a clear improvement in patient selection and clinical usefulness when compared with available models. We proposed an updated version of the nomogram predicting ECE using the recalibration method, which leads to an improvement in its performance and needs to be validated in another external set. Patient summaryWe validate a prediction tool based on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) parameters and MRI-targeted biopsy predicting extracapsular extension and seminal vesicle invasion at radical prostatectomy. An improvement of patient selection was not clearly demonstrated when compared with available models based on clinical parameters, and implementation of MRI in this setting still needs to be clarified.

SC63 - The added value of concomitant systematic biopsy in predicting biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy in patients with prostate cancer diagnosed by MRI-targeted biopsy

SC63 - The added value of concomitant systematic biopsy in predicting biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy in patients with prostate cancer diagnosed by MRI-targeted biopsy

Prognostic Implications of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Concomitant Systematic Biopsy in Predicting Biochemical Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy in Prostate Cancer Patients Diagnosed with Magnetic Resonance Imaging–targeted Biopsy

BackgroundThe prognostic role of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and systematic biopsy in predicting biochemical recurrence (BCR) after radical prostatectomy (RP) in prostate cancer (PCa) patients has not been addressed yet. ObjectiveTo develop a risk tool predicting BCR after RP in patients diagnosed with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-targeted biopsy. Design, setting, and participantsA total of 804 patients with a clinical suspicion of PCa and positive mpMRI diagnosed with MRI-targeted plus concomitant systematic biopsy treated with RP were identified. Outcome measurements and statistical analysesThe outcome was represented by BCR defined as two prostate-specific antigen (PSA) values ≥0.2ng/ml after surgery. Multivariable Cox regression analyses assessed the predictors of BCR. A risk tool model based on imaging and biopsy parameters was developed and validated internally. The c-index, calibration plot, and decision curve analyses were used to assess discrimination, calibration, and the net benefit associated with its use in predicting BCR at 36 mo. Results and limitationsMedian (interquartile range) follow-up was 28 (25–29) mo, and 89 patients experienced BCR. The 36-mo BCR-free survival rate was 89%. The maximum diameter of the index lesion and seminal vesicle invasion (SVI) at mpMRI as well as the presence of clinically significant PCa at systematic biopsy (defined as a grade group of >2) were associated with BCR (all p≤0.03). A model based on PSA, Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System score, SVI at mpMRI, diameter of the index lesion, grade group at MRI-targeted biopsy, and clinically significant PCa at systematic biopsy achieved the highest discrimination (77%) among all clinical models, as well as the European Association of Urology risk groups (62%) and the Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment (CAPRA) score (60%). This tool was characterized by excellent calibration at internal validation and the highest net benefit when predicting BCR for the threshold risk between 0% and 30%. ConclusionsThe adoption of predictive models accounting for mpMRI and MRI-targeted biopsy-derived variables and concomitant systematic biopsy would improve clinicians’ ability to identify patients at a higher risk of early recurrence after surgery. Patient summaryThe use of information obtained at multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI), and MRI-targeted and concomitant systematic biopsy would improve clinicians’ ability to identify prostate cancer patients at a higher risk of experiencing early biochemical recurrence after surgery.

Re: The Key Combined Value of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging–targeted and Concomitant Systematic Biopsies for the Prediction of Adverse Pathological Features in Prostate Cancer Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy

Re: The Key Combined Value of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging–targeted and Concomitant Systematic Biopsies for the Prediction of Adverse Pathological Features in Prostate Cancer Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy

PT143 - The added value of concomitant systematic biopsy in predicting biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy in patients with prostate cancer diagnosed by MRI-targeted biopsy

PT143 - The added value of concomitant systematic biopsy in predicting biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy in patients with prostate cancer diagnosed by MRI-targeted biopsy

External Validation of the 2019 Briganti Nomogram for the Identification of Prostate Cancer Patients Who Should Be Considered for an Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection

The 2019 Briganti nomogram was developed to calculate the risk of lymph node invasion (LNI) and identify prostate cancer (PCa) patients diagnosed with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-targeted biopsy who should be considered for an extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND). Since its implementation is still limited by lack of a formal external validation, we aimed to validate this tool in a large contemporary cohort. We identified 487 patients diagnosed using MRI-targeted with concomitant systematic biopsy who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) and an anatomically defined ePLND at six centers. The external validity of the 2019 Briganti nomogram for estimating LNI risk was assessed via calibration, discrimination, and decision curve analyses (DCAs). A total of 38 (8%) patients had LNI at final pathology. The median number of nodes removed was 18 (interquartile range 14–24). On external validation, the 2019 Briganti nomogram had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 79%. Although there was some miscalibration, this was at predicted probabilities >35% and therefore outside the clinically relevant range. DCA demonstrated that the 2019 Briganti nomogram improved clinical risk prediction against LNI threshold probabilities of ≤30%. For a 7% cutoff, 273 (56%) ePLNDs would be spared and only 2.6% LNIs would be missed. The 2019 Briganti nomogram was characterized by higher AUC compared to the 2012 and 2017 Briganti nomograms and the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center risk calculator (79% vs 75% vs 65% vs 74%) and demonstrated the highest net benefit on DCA. This first multi-institutional validation of the 2019 Briganti nomogram in predicting LNI in PCa patients diagnosed with MRI-targeted biopsy confirms the highest AUC, better calibration and the highest net benefit compared with available tools and should be adopted to identify candidates for ePLND among men diagnosed with MRI-targeted biopsy. Patient summaryWe performed the first multi-institutional validation of the first nomogram predicting lymph node invasion specifically developed using data from prostate cancer patients diagnosed with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-targeted biopsy. This nomogram exhibited excellent characteristics on external validation compared with available tools and should be adopted to identify candidates for extended pelvic lymph node dissection among men diagnosed with MRI-targeted biopsy.

PD57-02 WHEN IS MP-MRI RELIABLE IN PREDICTING EXTRA-PROSTATIC EXTENSION IN PROSTATE CANCER PATIENTS TREATED WITH RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY? RESULTS FROM A LARGE, MULTI-INSTITUTIONAL SERIES

PD57-02 WHEN IS MP-MRI RELIABLE IN PREDICTING EXTRA-PROSTATIC EXTENSION IN PROSTATE CANCER PATIENTS TREATED WITH RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY? RESULTS FROM A LARGE, MULTI-INSTITUTIONAL SERIES

SC236 - There is no way to avoid concomitant systematic prostate biopsies in addition to MP-MRI targeted sampling in men with positive imaging

SC236 - There is no way to avoid concomitant systematic prostate biopsies in addition to MP-MRI targeted sampling in men with positive imaging

SC238 - Added value of concomitant systematic biopsies in predicting upgrading in patients with localized prostate cancer diagnosed by MRI-targeted biopsy: Implications for patient selection

SC238 - Added value of concomitant systematic biopsies in predicting upgrading in patients with localized prostate cancer diagnosed by MRI-targeted biopsy: Implications for patient selection

The Key Combined Value of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging–targeted and Concomitant Systematic Biopsies for the Prediction of Adverse Pathological Features in Prostate Cancer Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy

BackgroundThe combined role of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mp-MRI), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-targeted and concomitant systematic biopsies in the identification of prostate cancer (PCa) patients at a higher risk of adverse pathology at radical prostatectomy (RP) is still unclear. ObjectiveTo develop novel models to predict extracapsular extension (ECE), seminal vesicle invasion (SVI), or upgrading in patients diagnosed with MRI-targeted and concomitant systematic biopsies. Design, setting, and participantsWe included 614 men with clinical stage≤T2 at digital rectal examination who underwent MRI-targeted biopsy with concomitant systematic biopsy. Outcome measurements and statistical analysesLogistic regression analyses predicting ECE, SVI, and upgrading (ie, a shift from biopsy International Society of Urological Pathology grade group to any higher grade at RP) based on clinical variables with or without mp-MRI features and systematic biopsy information (the percentage of cores with grade group ≥2 PCa) were developed and internally validated. The area under the curve (AUC) was used to identify the models with the highest discrimination. Decision-curve analyses (DCAs) determined the net benefit associated with their use. Results and limitationsOverall, 333 (54%), 88 (14%), and 169 (27%) patients had ECE, SVI, and upgrading at RP, respectively. The inclusion of mp-MRI data improved the discrimination of clinical models for ECE (67% vs 70%) and SVI (74% vs 76%). Models including mp-MRI, and MRI-targeted and concomitant systematic biopsy information achieved the highest AUC at internal validation for ECE (73%), SVI (81%), and upgrading (73%) and represented the basis for three risk calculators that yield the highest net benefit at DCA. ConclusionsNot only mp-MRI and MRI-targeted sampling, but also concomitant systematic biopsies provide significant information to identify patients at a higher risk of adverse pathology. Although omitting systematic prostate sampling at the time of MRI-targeted biopsy might be associated with a reduced risk of detecting insignificant PCa and lower patient discomfort, it reduces the ability to accurately predict pathological features. Patient summaryThe combination of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mp-MRI) with accurate biopsy information on MRI-targeted and systematic biopsies improves the accuracy of multivariable models based on clinical and mp-MRI data alone. Correct mp-MRI interpretation and proper extensive prostate sampling are both needed to predict adverse pathology accurately at radical prostatectomy.

Added Value of Concomitant Systematic and Fusion Targeted Biopsies for Grade Group Prediction Based on Radical Prostatectomy Final Pathology on Positive Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

We assessed the added value of concomitant systematic biopsy for final grade group prediction in patients with positive magnetic resonance imaging who were undergoing targeted biopsy. Included in study were 478 consecutive patients with prebiopsy positive multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and a greater than 10-core systematic biopsy combined with fusion targeted biopsy who underwent radical prostatectomy. The primary end point was the grade group concordance between biopsy and radical prostatectomy pathology according to the biopsy technique. Clinical and biological factors associated with the performance of systematic biopsy were analyzed. Adding systematic biopsy to targeted biopsy modified the d'Amico risk classification toward more intermediate and high risk in 7.8% of cases, mainly from low to intermediate risk with low risk prostate cancer on targeted biopsy in 44.3%. This reclassification was significantly higher in patients with lower prostate specific antigen and with prostate specific antigen density less than 0.20 ng/ml/gm (11.7% vs 2.4%, p <0.001). The concordance rate between biopsy pathology and radical prostatectomy pathology significantly differed between targeted biopsy and targeted biopsy plus systematic biopsy (45.2% and 51.7%, respectively). The upgrading rate in radical prostatectomy specimens decreased by 22% when systematic biopsy was added to targeted biopsy. Patients in whom systematic biopsy did not modify grading were more likely to have pT3-4 and/or pN1 disease on final pathology (56.9% vs 38.3%, p=0.007). Grading concordance between biopsy pathology and radical prostatectomy pathology was improved by adding systematic biopsy in all patient subgroups. Patients with prostate specific antigen density less than 0.20 ng/ml/gm benefited the most from this combined biopsy strategy. Systematic biopsy reclassified a nonnegligible number of cases toward a higher risk category, mainly the low risk cases. Thus, systematic biopsy could modify treatment decision making.