Concomitant Proton Pump Inhibitors Research Articles

No Impact of Concomitant Medications on Efficacy and Safety of Biologics and Small Molecules for Ulcerative Colitis

While participants with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) in clinical trials of biologics and small molecule drugs (henceforth, advanced therapies) frequently receive several medications concomitantly, it is unclear how they modify treatment effect. Through an individual patient data pooled analysis of ten clinical trials of advanced therapies for moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis (UC), we assessed whether concomitant exposure to corticosteroids, immunomodulators, 5-aminosalicylates, proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), histamine receptor antagonists (H2RA), opiates, antidepressants, and antibiotics modified the effect of the intervention on treatment efficacy and safety outcomes, using modified Poisson regression model. Of 6044 patients (4280 receiving intervention, 1764 receiving placebo), several received concomitant corticosteroids (47%), immunomodulators (28%), 5-aminosalicylates (68%), PPIs (14%), H2RAs (2%), opiates (7%), antidepressants (6%), and/or antibiotics (5%). After adjusting for confounders and examining treatment efficacy of intervention vs. placebo, we observed no impact of concomitant exposure to corticosteroids (ratio of relative risk of drug vs. placebo with vs. without concomitant exposure: RRR, 0.81 [95% CI,0.63-1.06], 5-aminosalicylates (RRR, 1.04[0.78-1.39]), PPIs (RRR, 0.87 [0.61-1.22]), H2RAs (RRR, 1.72[0.97-14.29]), opiates (RRR, 0.90[0.54-1.49]), antidepressants (RRR, 1.02[0.57-1.83]), and antibiotics (RRR, 0.72[0.44-1.16]) on likelihood of clinical remission. Concomitant exposure to immunomodulators was associated with lower likelihood of achieving clinical remission (RRR, 0.73[0.55-0.97]), particularly with non-TNF antagonists. In clinical trials of advanced therapies for UC, baseline concomitant exposure to multiple commonly used class of medications does not impact treatment efficacy or safety. These findings directly inform design of regulatory clinical trials with respect to managing concomitant medications at baseline.

Prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection among patients with esophageal carcinoma.

Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) is a widespread microorganism related to gastric adenocarcinoma (AC). In contrast, it has been reported that an inverse association exists between H. pylori infection and esophageal carcinoma. The mechanisms underlying this supposedly protective effect remain controversial. To determine the prevalence of H. pylori infection in esophageal carcinoma patients, we performed a retrospective observational study of esophageal tumors diagnosed in our hospital. We retrospectively reviewed the prevalence of H. pylori infection in a cohort of patients diagnosed with esophageal carcinoma. Concomitant or previous proton pump inhibitor (PPI) usage was also recorded. A total of 89 patients with esophageal carcinoma (69 males, 77.5%), with a mean age of 66 years (range, 26-93 years) were included. AC was the most frequent pathological variant (n = 47, 52.8%), followed by squamous cell carcinoma (n = 37, 41.6%). Fourteen ACs (29.8%) originated in the gastroesophageal junction and 33 (70.2%) in the esophageal body. Overall, 54 patients (60.7%) presented at stages III and IV. Previous H. pylori infection occurred only in 4 patients (4.5%), 3 with AC (6.3% of all ACs) and 1 with squamous cell carcinoma (2.7% of all squamous cell tumors). All patients with previous H. pylori infection had stage III-IV. Only one patient had received prior H. pylori eradication therapy, whereas 86 (96.6%) had received previous or concomitant PPI treatment. In our cohort of patients, and after histologic evaluation of paraffin-embedded primary tumors, we found a very low prevalence of previous H. pylori infection. We also reviewed the medical history of the patients, concluding that the majority had received or were on PPI treatment. The minimal prevalence of H. pylori infection found in this cohort of patients with esophageal carcinoma suggests a protective role.

Concomitant Administration of VEGFR Tyrosine Kinase and Proton Pump Inhibitors May Impair Clinical Outcome of Patients With Metastatic Renal Cancer

IntroductionThe administration of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) is a common practice to reduce gastro-esophageal adverse events associated with drug treatments but may impair absorption and exposure to oncology drugs. This study investigated the effect of concomitant administration of PPIs and pazopanib, sunitinib and cabozantinib on survival of patients with metastatic clear cell renal carcinoma (mRCC). Patients and MethodsTotal 451 patients receiving pazopanib, sunitinib and cabozantinib as first line treatment were enrolled in this retrospective study. Patients were defined as “no concomitant PPIs (PPI−)” if no PPIs were administered during TKIs, and as “concomitant PPIs (PPI+)” if the administration of PPIs was at least 75% of the time during which TKIs were given. ResultsEighty patients administered pazopanib were PPI− and 86 PPI+; no difference in PFS was observed (10.7 vs. 11.9 months, P = .79). If patients were stratified as short (n = 89) and long (n = 77) responders, there was a significant difference in terms of PFS in PPI+ (n = 47) versus PPI− (n = 30) in long responders, being 24.7 versus 38 months (P = .04), respectively. In the sunitinib cohort, no significant difference of PFS in PPI+ (n = 102) versus PPI− (n = 131) was found, being 11.3 versus 18.1 months, respectively (P=0.15). In the cabozantinib cohort, there was a statistically significant difference in PFS of PPI+ versus PPI− (6 months vs. not reached, P = .04). No correlation with adverse events was found. ConclusionsThis study demonstrates an association between PPIs and impaired PFS in mRCC patients given pazopanib and cabozantinib and recommends caution on their concomitant use.

Frequency of comedication of proton pump inhibitors with crystalline dasatinib in chronic myeloid leukemia and effects on TKI-bioavailability.

6561 Background: Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI), including dasatinib, have profoundly improved clinical outcome in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). However, solubility, bioavailability and systematic exposure of the crystalline formulation of dasatinib (Sprycel) is reduced at higher gastric pH levels. This is problematic for comedication with acid reducing agents as lower bioavailability may reduce clinical response. Methods: We investigated proton pump inhibitor (PPI) and TKI comedication, including dasatinib, in a large real world CML cohort. Furthermore, we assessed the influence of timing of PPI comedication on the absorption and bioavailability of dasatinib. Results: Using the Swedish CML- and Prescribed Drug-Registries, we identified 1,328 chronic phase CML patients, diagnosed 2002-2018. 1,261 (95%) had received specified/known TKI treatment and 685 of those (54%) were prescribed a PPI (ATC-code: “A02BC”) at some point after CML diagnosis. TKIs and PPIs prescribed within 12 months of CML diagnosis were prescribed by different HCPs in 66% of cases (284/432). Of the 388 patients treated with dasatinib, 91 (23.5%) received a concomitant PPI. The PPI prescription rate increased to 53% (204/388) in the dasatinib cohort after dasatinib treatment had ended. Further, we assessed the drug-drug interaction (DDI) in 18 healthy volunteers given crystalline dasatinib (100mg) alone or together with omeprazole (40mg, at steady state) administered 9 hours apart; a time point when a high effect on bioavailability is expected. Compared to dosing with crystalline dasatinib alone, Cmax and AUC0-24 were reduced by 96% and 88% by omeprazole comedication (Table). Conclusions: Despite warnings, comedication with PPI is common among dasatinib treated CML patients. Further, an even larger proportion of patients need PPI co-treatment, which however, cannot fully be administered due to its negative impact on dasatinib pharmacokinetics. Moreover, with an optimized study design, we observed a higher than previously reported negative interaction of PPI comedication on crystalline dasatinib bioavailability. This may compromise clinical efficacy and risk CML disease progression. For patients in need of PPI, selection of a non-crystalline, less pH-sensitive formulation of dasatinib therefore appears more appropriate. Clinical trial information: NCT06145217 . [Table: see text]

Evaluation of Aspirin Prescribing and Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Adults 60 Years of Age and Older in a Large, Academic Health System.

Background National guidelines no longer recommend adults 60 years of age and older to begin treatment with low-dose daily aspirin for primary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (CVD) due to a lack of proven net benefit and a higher risk of bleeding. Objective The objective of this cross-sectional retrospective analysis was to evaluate the appropriateness of low-dose aspirin prescribing and subsequent gastrointestinal bleeding in older persons receiving primary care in a large academic health system. Setting Large, academic health system within Colorado. Patients Patients with an active order for daily low-dose aspirin as of July 1, 2021, were assessed for appropriateness based on indication (primary vs secondary prevention) and use of a concomitant proton-pump inhibitor (PPI). Incident gastrointestinal bleeds (GIBs) in the subsequent 12 months and GIB risk factors were also evaluated. Results A total of 19,525 patients were included in the analysis. Eighty-nine percent of patients identified as White and 54% identified as male. Of the total cohort, 44% had CVD and 19% were co-prescribed a PPI. GIB occurred in 247 patients (1.27%) within the subsequent year. Risk factors significantly associated with a GIB within 1 year included: history of GIB, history of peptic ulcer disease, other esophageal issue (esophagitis, Barrett's esophagus, Mallory Weiss tears, etc.), 75 years of age or older, and history of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Conclusion This evaluation found that many older persons at this institution may be inappropriately prescribed aspirin, providing opportunities for pharmacists to improve medication safety by deprescribing aspirin among primary prevention patients or potentially co-prescribing a PPI in secondary prevention patients.

Abstract PO1-01-08: The impact of drug-drug interactions between palbociclib and proton pump inhibitors on clinical outcomes of patients with hormone receptor positive, HER2-negative, early breast cancer: an exploratory analysis of the PALLAS study

Abstract Background: Data suggest that concomitant intake of proton pump inhibitors (PPI) may create drug-drug interactions, potentially impacting efficacy of agents including palbociclib, which is widely used in the treatment of metastatic hormone-receptor-positive/HER2-negative (HR+/HER2-) breast cancer. In the open label, randomized, phase 3 PALLAS trial, the addition of palbociclib for two years to standard adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) in patients with HR+/HER2- early breast cancer (EBC) did not improve invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) compared to adjuvant ET alone. We explored whether concomitant use of PPIs could have affected clinical outcomes in patients treated with palbociclib in PALLAS. Methods: This is an exploratory, unplanned analysis of the PALLAS trial (AFT-05/ABCSG-42/PrE0109/BIG-14-13, NCT02513394), which enrolled 5796 patients with stage II-III HR+/HER2- EBC. Patients were randomized to receive either 2 years of palbociclib (125 mg oral capsules once daily on days 1-21 of a 28-day cycle) with adjuvant ET or ET alone. Primary endpoint was IDFS in the intention-to-treat population. The present exploratory analysis included patients who received at least one dose of palbociclib. Definitions of IDFS, distant relapse-free survival (DRFS) and overall survival (OS) were according to the PALLAS protocol (STEEP criteria), using first day of palbociclib intake as start date. Only PPI concomitant intake during palbociclib treatment was considered. To determine the association of concomitant PPI use with IDFS, DRFS, and OS, uni- and multivariable Cox models with time-dependent PPI (the latter adjusted for age, prior chemotherapy, progesterone receptor, grade, tumor stage, nodal stage, body mass index (BMI)) were used. Also, the association between PPI use and neutropenia was investigated in patients initiating PPI prior to randomization vs never. Odds ratios (OR) unadjusted and adjusted for age and BMI estimated with logistic regression models are reported. Results: Of 2840 patients treated with palbociclib + ET, 533 (18.8%) had concomitant PPI and palbociclib intake. Median duration of PPI intake was 10.8 months (interquartile range 2.3-22.3). Most patients received omeprazole as PPI (n=265, 49.7%). PPI intake was significantly associated with older age, post-menopausal status, use of aromatase inhibitors as ET, higher BMI, and worse ECOG status (all p< 0.001). Concomitant PPI intake was not significantly associated with survival outcomes (Table 1). Unadjusted all grade neutropenia rates were slightly lower in patients who initiated PPI prior study start vs patients never initiating (79% vs 85%, unadjusted OR 0.66, 95%CI 0.50-0.88). After adjustment for BMI and age, the difference between the groups decreased (adjusted OR = 0.77, 95%CI 0.57-1.04). Similar effect sizes were found for grade 3/4 neutropenia rates (54% vs 64%, unadjusted OR 0.66, 95%CI 0.52-0.83, adjusted OR 0.81, 95%CI 0.64-1.03). Conclusions: Our exploratory analysis did not demonstrate a statistically significant relationship between concomitant use of PPIs and palbociclib and survival outcomes of patients in the PALLAS trial. Nonetheless, careful consideration of concomitant medications and of drug-drug interactions is important when studying novel agents in the adjuvant breast cancer setting. Support: AFT, Pfizer; https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org Table 1. Association between PPI intake and survival outcomes. Citation Format: Elisa Agostinetto, Georg Pfeiler, Dominik Hlauschek, Erica Mayer, Matteo Lambertini, Evandro de Azambuja, Meritxell Bellet- Ezquerra, Jane Meisel, Gabor Rubovszky, Nicholas Zdenkowski, Yelena Novik, Manuel Ruíz - Borrego, Karen Gelmon, Eleftherios Mamounas, Hiroji Iwata, Dongrui Lu, Lidija Sölkner, Christian Fesl, Michael Gnant, Angela DeMichele. The impact of drug-drug interactions between palbociclib and proton pump inhibitors on clinical outcomes of patients with hormone receptor positive, HER2-negative, early breast cancer: an exploratory analysis of the PALLAS study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO1-01-08.

A218 TRADING ONE PROBLEM FOR ANOTHER? THE EMERGENCE OF LYMPHOCYTIC ESOPHAGITIS IN A PEDIATRIC PATIENT WITH EOSINOPHILIC ESOPHAGITIS AFTER TREATMENT WITH DUPILUMAB

Abstract Background Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a Th2 driven chronic, inflammatory disorder defined by esophageal dysfunction and a peak eosinophil count (PEC) ≧ 15 eosinophils/high-power field on biopsy. Dupilumab, a human monoclonal antibody that inhibits IL-4 and IL-13 signaling was recently approved for use in Canada in children with EoE. There is limited data on the histologic abnormalities found with reintroduction of dietary triggers on dupilumab. Aims To describe emergence of lymphocytic esophagitis without eosinophilia observed during food reintroduction in a pediatric patient with EoE on dupilumab. Methods Case report and literature review. Results We present a 14-year-old boy with extensive food allergies, eczema, asthma and treatment refractory EoE. After failing to improve with proton-pump inhibitor (PPI), food elimination diet and topical steroids, he was started on an elemental formula with concomitant PPI. This resulted in symptomatic and histologic remission, however food restriction led to poor quality of life. The patient was started on dupilumab 200 mg every 2 weeks and had a dramatic improvement in his disease course. Over 2 years on treatment, several allergic foods were reintroduced with normal histologic biopsies. However, two dietary challenges led to the emergence of lymphocytic esophagitis with basal zone hyperplasia (BZH) and dilated intercellular spaces (DIS), but no eosinophilia. Subsequent removal of the dietary antigen and endoscopic reassessment led to normal biopsies, without lymphocytic or eosinophilic infiltration. Lymphocytic esophagitis is rare in children and the etiology is unknown; it is characterized by increased intraepithelial lymphocytes without eosinophils or neutrophils, and associated spongiosis. The emergence of lymphocytic esophagitis was unexpected and subsequent normalization of histology with removal of an antigen suggests that the lymphocytic pattern observed was driven by the allergic food. This may indicate that IL-4/IL-13 antagonism by dupilumab affects other immune signaling pathways, resulting in a lymphocytic-predominant inflammatory response upon exposure to allergic food antigens. Conclusions Dupilumab is a promising new medication in the management of pediatric EoE, particularly in the extremely atopic patient. In our case, the use of dupilumab led to improved antigen tolerance and quality of life. However, the emergence of lymphocytic esophagitis was unexpected, and the natural history and prognosis of this condition is not well defined. This is the first case to describe the emergence of lymphocytic esophagitis in a patient treated for eosinophilic esophagitis with dupilumab, and its subsequent resolution with dietary exclusion. Funding Agencies None

Proton Pump Inhibitors and Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4/6 Inhibitors in Patients With Breast Cancer.

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) reduce the bioavailability of several anticancer drugs. The impact of PPIs co-administered with cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitors is controversial. We aimed to clarify whether the concomitant use of PPIs impacts palbociclib and abemaciclib effectiveness in breast cancer treatment. This multicenter, retrospective, observational study, conducted across 4 medical institutions in Japan, consecutively included patients with endocrine-resistant metastatic breast cancer, receiving palbociclib or abemaciclib between December 2017 and August 2022. Propensity score-matched analyses were performed. Treatment efficacy and safety with and without PPIs were compared. Progression-free survival and overall survival were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using a log-rank test. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate the hazard ratio. The study included 240 patients. After 1:1 matching, 112 patients were treated with and without PPIs. The median progression-free survival period was 1.2 years in the PPI group and 1.3 years in the non-PPI group (hazard ratio, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.70-2.02). The median overall survival period was 3.6 years in the PPI group, whereas it was not reached in the non-PPI group (hazard ratio, 1.23; 95% CI, 0.61-2.47). Consistent results were obtained for subgroups receiving palbociclib (n = 177) and abemaciclib (n = 63) without propensity score matching. Adverse event incidence and severity were similar in both groups. The effectiveness of cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors is unlikely to be affected by concomitant PPI use. Future prospective pharmacokinetic studies are warranted.

Proton Pump Inhibitors Ameliorate Oxaliplatin-induced Peripheral Neuropathy: Retrospective Analysis of Two Real-world Clinical Databases.

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) due to oxaliplatin (L-OHP) is a major clinical problem. Effective and safe preventive strategies for CIPN are urgently needed. Although proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) have various off-target effects, their clinical impact on L-OHP-induced CIPN remains unclear. In the present study, we investigated the effects of PPIs on L-OHP-induced CIPN in patients using two real-world clinical databases. We retrospectively analyzed the electronic medical records of Osaka University Hospital to examine the effect of PPIs on CIPN development in 217 patients who received XELOX (L-OHP plus capecitabine) therapy for colorectal cancer. In addition, the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report (JADER) database was used to validate the effects of PPIs on L-OHP-induced CIPN. The incidences of CIPN (grade ≥2) and discontinuation of L-OHP were significantly lower in patients with PPIs than in those without PPIs. Multivariate analysis showed that concomitant PPIs use was an independent factor that significantly contributed to the prevention of grade ≥2 CIPN (odds ratio=0.054, p<0.001). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the time to onset of grade ≥2 CIPN was significantly prolonged in patients with PPIs without affecting the therapeutic efficacy of L-OHP (p=0.004). Moreover, JADER database analyses revealed that the reporting odds ratio of any PPI for L-OHP-induced CIPN was 0.485. Concomitant PPI use ameliorated L-OHP-induced CIPN in patients with colorectal cancer.

PPIs therapy has a negative impact on the clinical outcomes of advanced SCLC patients treated with PD-L1 inhibitors

BackgroundProgrammed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors has emerged as a first-line therapeutic strategy for advanced small cell lung cancer (SCLC), which can stimulate T-cell activation, thereby preventing tumor avoidance of immunologic surveillance, whereas, proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) can play an important role in regulating immune function. This study assessed whether the concomitantly use of PPIs affected outcomes of immunotherapy in advanced SCLC.MethodsData from advanced SCLC patients who firstly treated with PD-L1 inhibitors between July 2018 and February 2021 was retrospectively analyzed. The impact of concomitant medications (especially PPIs) on objective response rate, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated.ResultsOf 208 patients, 101 received immunotherapy concomitant PPIs. The median PFS of patients receiving PPIs (6.6 months) were significantly shorter than those without PPIs (10.6 months), and so was OS. There was associated with a 74.9% increased risk of progression and 58.3% increased risk of death. Both first-line and post-first-line immunotherapy, patients treated PPIs had poorer PFS.ConclusionPPIs therapy has a negative impact on the clinical outcomes of advanced SCLC patients treated with PD-L1 inhibitors.

Interplay among proton pump inhibitors, platelet reactivity and CYP2C19 genotyping in clopidogrel-treated patients after drug-eluting stent implantation

Abstract Background Several published data suggested that concomitant use of clopidogrel and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) is associated with reduced antiplatelet efficacy of clopidogrel and increased adverse clinical outcomes. We sought to evaluate the interplay between PPI and clopidogrel on platelet reactivity and long-term clinical outcomes in patients after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation. Methods The PTRG-DES (Platelet function and genoType-Related long-term proGnosis in DES-treated patients) registry is a multi-center, real-world registry of patients who underwent PCI with DES and received dual antiplatelet therapy of aspirin and clopidogrel in South Korea. Patients prescribed with PPI were compared to those without the use of PPI (the control group). The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, and stroke at 5 years. Secondary outcomes included cardiac death, major bleeding, and gastrointestinal bleeding. Adjusted outcomes were compared after 1:2 propensity score (PS) matching analysis. Results Among 13,160 patients, 2235 (17.0%) were prescribed with concomitant PPI at the time of clopidogrel loading. Average age was 64.4 years, 67.2% were men, and 35.1% had diabetes. The PPI group demonstrated a higher on-treatment P2Y12 reaction unit than the control group (p&amp;lt;0.001). The 5-year cumulative incidence of the composite primary outcome was higher in the PPI group (12.1% vs. 9.8%, log-rank p&amp;lt;0.001). After PS matching, the primary outcome was similar between the two groups (12.9% vs. 12.1%, log-rank p=0.24). However, the PPI group with CYP2C19 poor metabolizers showed an increased adjusted risk of the primary outcome (hazard ratio 2.69, p&amp;lt;0.001). Conclusions PPI use in patients with clopidogrel administration after DES implantation was associated with increased platelet reactivity, but similar cardiovascular outcomes in real-world practice. Physicians should be careful when administering PPI with clopidogrel in patients with CYP2C19 poor metabolizers.Distribution of P2Y12 reaction unitCumulative Incidence of outcomes

Australian data on the utilisation and duration on treatment of ibrutinib with a proton pump inhibitor in patients with relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukaemia.

In Australia, over half of patients with relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukaemia treated with ibrutinib use concomitant proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). High gastric pH reduces the bioavailability of some Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors. There was no difference in duration on ibrutinib with or without concomitant PPI (unadjusted P = 0.61; adjusted hazard ratio: 1.23, 95% confidence interval: 0.75-2.02, P = 0.411). PPI use does not affect ibrutinib treatment persistence.

The Association between Proton Pump Inhibitors and the Effectiveness of CDK Inhibitors in HR+/HER- Advanced Breast Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

There have been many clinical questions regarding whether the use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) could deteriorate the effects of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors (CDKIs) in HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer patients. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of this clinical question, including studies enrolling HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer patients treated with CDKIs (Palbociclib or Ribociclib) and reporting at least one comparative survival outcome, either overall survival (OS) or progression-free survival (PFS), between concomitant PPI users and non-users. Eight studies met the eligibility criteria, with a total of 2584 patients included (PPI users: 830, PPI non-users: 1754), demonstrating that concomitant PPI use was associated with significantly higher risks of all-cause mortality (HR = 2.03; 95% CI, 1.49 to 2.77; I2 = 0%) and disease progression (HR = 1.75; 95% CI, 1.26 to 2.43; I2 = 59%) in breast cancer patients taking Palbociclib. In contrast, there were no significant survival impacts of PPIs on Ribociclib (HR = 1.46; 95% CI, 0.91 to 2.34; I2 = 36%). Additionally, there was no significant difference in the risk associated with CDKI dose reduction due to drug toxicity (RR = 1.12; 95% CI, 0.97 to 1.29). Therefore, when HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer patients require the use of PPIs, it may be reasonable to consider using Ribociclib.

Use of concomitant proton pump inhibitors, statins or metformin in patients treated with pembrolizumab for metastatic urothelial carcinoma: data from the ARON-2 retrospective study.

Concomitant medications may potentially affect the outcome of cancer patients. In this sub-analysis of the ARON-2 real-world study (NCT05290038), we aimed to assess the impact of concomitant use of proton pump inhibitors (PPI), statins, or metformin on outcome of patients with metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC) receiving second-line pembrolizumab. We collected data from the hospital medical records of patients with mUC treated with pembrolizumab as second-line therapy at 87 institutions from 22 countries. Patients were assessed for overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall response rate. We carried out a survival analysis by a Cox regression model. A total of 802 patients were eligible for this retrospective study; the median follow-up time was 15.3months. PPI users compared to non-users showed inferior PFS (4.5 vs. 7.2months, p = 0.002) and OS (8.7 vs. 14.1months, p < 0.001). Concomitant PPI use remained a significant predictor of PFS and OS after multivariate Cox analysis. The use of statins or metformin was not associated with response or survival. Our study results suggest a significant prognostic impact of concomitant PPI use in mUC patients receiving pembrolizumab in the real-world context. The mechanism of this interaction warrants further elucidation.

Impact of Concomitant Use of Proton Pump Inhibitors and Clopidogrel on Recurrent Stroke and Myocardial Infarction.

Conflicting results have been reported regarding the interaction between proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and clopidogrel. We investigated whether concomitant PPI use influenced the risk of recurrence in patients with stroke and myocardial infarction (MI). This study used two databases for two different designs, the Korean National Health Insurance Service (NHIS) database for a self-controlled case series design, and the national sample cohort of the NHIS data base converted to the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership-Common Data Model version for a cohort study based on large-scale propensity score matching. In the PPI co-prescription group, recurrent hospitalization with stroke occurred in 17.6% of the 8201 patients with history of stroke, and recurrent MI occurred in 17.1% of the 1216 patients with history of MI within1 year. According to the self-controlled case series, the overall relative risk (RR) of recurrent stroke was 2.09 (95% confidence interval (CI); 1.83-2.38); the RR showed an increasing trend parallel to the time from the beginning of PPI co-prescription. In the cohort study, there was a higher incidence of recurrent stroke in the PPI co-prescription group (Hazard ratio (HR): 1.34, 95% CI: 1.01-1.76, p = 0.04). The overall RR of recurrent MI was 1.47 (95% CI; 1.02-2.11) in the self-controlled case series; however, there was no statistically significant difference in recurrent MI in the cohort study (HR:1.42, 95% CI:0.79-2.49, p = 0.23). The impact of individual PPIs on stroke and MI showed different patterns. A PPI co-prescription >4 weeks with clopidogrel was associated with hospitalization of recurrent stroke within 1 year of initial diagnosis; however, its association with recurrent MI remains inconclusive. The influence of individual PPIs should be clarified in the future.

Proton pump inhibitors and gastroprotection in patients treated with antithrombotic drugs: A cardiologic point of view.

Aspirin, other antiplatelet agents, and anticoagulant drugs are used across a wide spectrum of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases. A concomitant proton pump inhibitor (PPI) treatment is often prescribed in these patients, as gastrointestinal complications are relatively frequent. On the other hand, a potential increased risk of cardiovascular events has been suggested in patients treated with PPIs; in particular, it has been discussed whether these drugs may reduce the cardiovascular protection of clopidogrel, due to pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic interactions through hepatic metabolism. Previously, the concomitant use of clopidogrel and omeprazole or esomeprazole has been discouraged. In contrast, it remains less known whether PPI use may affect the clinical efficacy of ticagrelor and prasugrel, new P2Y12 receptor antagonists. Current guidelines recommend PPI use in combination with antiplatelet treatment in patients with risk factors for gastrointestinal bleeding, including advanced age, concurrent use of anticoagulants, steroids, or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection. In patients taking oral anticoagulant with risk factors for gastrointestinal bleeding, PPIs could be recommended, even if their usefulness deserves further data. H. pylori infection should always be investigated and treated in patients with a history of peptic ulcer disease (with or without complication) treated with antithrombotic drugs. The present review summarizes the current knowledge regarding the widespread combined use of platelet inhibitors, anticoagulants, and PPIs, discussing consequent clinical implications.

Concomitant Use of Proton Pump Inhibitors and Palbociclib Among Patients With Breast Cancer

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are commonly used drugs to relieve gastrointestinal tract symptoms, but their acid-inhibitory action negatively affects the bioavailability and clinical outcomes of orally administered concomitant drugs. To identify the clinical outcomes of patients with advanced breast cancer who concomitantly use PPIs and palbociclib. This retrospective cohort study used nationwide claims data between November 1, 2016, and July 31, 2021, in South Korea. Patients with breast cancer receiving palbociclib between November 1, 2017, and July 31, 2020, were identified. Patients whose prescriptions for palbociclib and PPI overlapped by at least 33% were classified into a concomitant PPI group. Patients who never received PPI during the palbociclib treatment period were classified into a nonconcomitant PPI group. Patients were selected through 1:3 propensity score matching for analyses. Concomitant use of PPIs with palbociclib. Time to progression and death. These outcomes were presented as progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) and were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) of concomitant PPI use associated with clinical PFS and/or OS. A total of 344 women were included in the concomitant PPI group and 966 in the nonconcomitant PPI group. Among 1310 patients identified after matching, 1108 (84.6%) were older than 50 years; 1111 (84.8%) were treated with letrozole and anastrozole (endocrine sensitive); and 199 (15.2%) were treated with fulvestrant (endocrine resistant). The median clinical PFS in the concomitant PPI group was shorter than that of the nonconcomitant PPI group (25.3 [95% CI, 19.6-33.0] vs 39.8 [95% CI, 34.9 to not applicable] months; P < .001), and the HR was 1.76 (95% CI, 1.46-2.13). Concomitant use of PPI was also associated with shorter OS (HR, 2.71 [95% CI, 2.07-3.53]). Both clinical PFS and OS in the concomitant PPI group were consistently poor in patients receiving endocrine-sensitive and endocrine-resistant treatment. These findings suggest that concomitant use of PPIs with palbociclib may hinder the complete therapeutic benefits of palbociclib in patients with breast cancer.

Association between concomitant proton pump inhibitor use and survival of patients with metastatic prostate cancer receiving abiraterone acetate: a post-hoc analysis of pooled data from three randomized controlled trials.

Evidence suggests proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use may attenuate the effect of abiraterone acetate plus prednisone (AAP) in metastatic prostate cancer via the modification of gut microbiota. This study aimed to examine whether concomitant PPI use is associated with survival in patients with metastatic prostate cancer treated with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and AAP. Post-hoc analysis was conducted in patients with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) and metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) treated in the LATITUDE, COU-AA-301, and COU-AA-302 trials (ADT vs. ADT plus AAP). PPI users and non-users were compared for restricted mean overall survival time (RMOST) and restricted mean progression-free survival time (RMPFST) based on inverse probability of treatment weight (IPTW)-adjusted Kaplan-Meier curves. IPTW-adjusted Cox regression models were used to assess heterogeneity of treatment effect. In patients treated with AAP, PPI use was associated with inferior RMOST [difference (95% confidence interval): -4.2 (-7.0 to -1.4)] and RMPFST [-3.5 (-6.6 to -0.4)] compared with non-users. However, RMOST and RMPFST were similar between PPI users and non-users in patients treated with ADT alone [RMOST, -2.6 (-5.8 to 0.6); RMPFST, -1.7 (-4.8 to 1.4)]. Interaction term analyses did not show evidence of heterogeneity in treatment effect between AAP and ADT, despite the prominent treatment effect shown in mCSPC vs. mCRPC. PPI use may be associated with inferior survival in patients with metastatic prostate cancer who receive ADT plus AAP. Discontinuing unnecessary PPI use might improve those outcomes.

Associated Factors to Efficacy and Tolerance of Immunotherapy in Older Patients with Cancer Aged 70 Years and Over: Impact of Coprescriptions.

Immunotherapy with immune checkpoint blockers (ICB) significantly improves the prognosis for an increasing number of cancers. However, data on geriatric populations taking ICB are rare. This study aimed to identify factors associated with the efficacy and tolerance of ICB in an older population. This retrospective monocentric study included consecutive patients aged ≥70 years with solid cancer who received ICB between January 2018 and December 2019. Efficacy was assessed by progression-free survival (PFS) and tolerance was defined as cessation of immunotherapy due to the occurrence of any adverse event. One hundred and five patients (65.7% men) were included, mainly at the metastatic stage (95.2%); 50.5% had lung cancer. Most (80%) patients were treated with anti-PD1 (nivolumab, pembrolizumab), 19.1% with anti-PD-L1 (atezolizumab, durvalumab, and avelumab) and 0.9% with anti-CTLA4 ICB (ipilimumab). Median PFS was 3.7 months [95% confidence interval (CI) (2.75-5.70)]. PFS was shorter in univariate analysis when ICB was taken concomitantly with an antiplatelet agent (AP) [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.93; 95% CI (1.22-3.04); p=0.005]. Tolerance was lower in univariate analysis for lung cancer [odds ratio (OR)=3.03; 95% CI (1.07-8.56), p < 0.05] and in patients taking proton pump inhibitors (PPI) [OR=5.50; 95% CI (1.96-15.42), p < 0.001]. There was a trend toward poorer tolerance among patients living alone [OR=2.26; 95% CI (0.76-6.72); p=0.14]. In older patients taking ICB for solid cancers, concomitant AP may influence efficacy and concomitant PPI may influence tolerance. Further studies are needed to confirm these results.

Impact of concomitant proton pump inhibitor during oral anticoagulant treatment

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background/Introduction Proton pump inhibitor is commonly used for gastroprotective effect in patients with a combination of antiplatelets and anticoagulants. However, data quantifying the concomitant proton pump inhibitor for clinical adverse outcomes other than gastrointestinal bleedings of oral anticoagulant is lacking. Purpose We aimed to explore the effect of concomitant proton pump inhibitor on the effectiveness and safety of oral anticoagulant in patients with atrial fibrillation. Methods The medical records were retrospectively reviewed from four tertiary referral hospitals between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2020. Concomitant use of drug was quantified as the overlapping proportion over the duration of oral anticoagulant therapy. Primary endpoint was the time to occurrence of ischemic stroke, systemic embolism, intracardiac thrombus, major bleeding events, or death. Results Data were analyzed for 20,750 episodes with oral anticoagulant and atrial fibrillation (median [IQR] age, 71 [63-78] years; female, 42.5%; warfarin, 37.3%; median [IQR] CHA2DS2-VASc score, 3 [2-5]). The risk of primary endpoint was greatest in the group of persistent use (80% or more of overlapping proportion) of proton pump inhibitor among the other groups with less overlapping proportion (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.88; 95% confidence interval, 1.63–2.16; P for groups, &amp;lt;0.001). Concomitant proton pump inhibitor was not associated with the risk of major bleeding from the gastrointestinal tract. Conclusion Among patients with atrial fibrillation receiving oral anticoagulant, concomitant use of proton pump inhibitor increased the rate of thromboembolism, major bleeding, or death in proportion of overlapping period.