Concomitant Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Research Articles

B-55 | Trends and Outcomes of Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump Use in Patients with Concomitant Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement and Coronary Artery Bypass Graft: A 5-Year Cohort Study

B-55 | Trends and Outcomes of Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump Use in Patients with Concomitant Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement and Coronary Artery Bypass Graft: A 5-Year Cohort Study

Myocardial bridging in obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a risk factor for myocardial fibrosis.

Myocardial bridging (MB) is common in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). There are sparse data on the impact of MB on myocardial fibrosis in HCM. This study was designed to evaluate the relationship between MB and myocardial fibrosis in patients with obstructive HCM. In this cohort study, retrospective data were collected from a high-volume HCM center. Patients with obstructive HCM who underwent septal myectomy and preoperative cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) were screened from 2011 to 2018. Finally, 492 patients were included in this study, with an average age of 45.7years. Of these patients, 76 patients had MB. MB occurred mostly in the left anterior descending artery (73/76). The global extent of late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) was correlated with the degree of systolic compression (r = 0.33, p = 0.003). Multivariable linear regression analysis revealed that the degree of systolic compression was an independent risk factor for LGE (β = 0.292, p = 0.007). The LGE fraction of basal and mid anteroseptal segments in patients with severe MB (compression ratio ≥ 80%) was significantly greater than that in patients with mild to moderate MB (compression ratio < 80%). During a median follow-up of 28 (IQR: 15-52) months, 15 patients died. Kaplan-Meier analysis did not identify differences in all-cause death (log-rank p = 0.63) or cardiovascular death (log-rank p = 0.72) between patients undergoing MB-related surgery and those without MB. MB with severe systolic compression was significantly associated with a high extent of fibrosis in patients with obstructive HCM. Concomitant myotomy or coronary artery bypass grafting might provide excellent survival similar to that of patients without MB. Identification of patients with severe MB and providing comprehensive management might help improve the prognosis of patients with HCM.

Effects of Concomitant CABG on Outcomes in Veterans Who Require Surgery for Endocarditis.

Infective Endocarditis (IE) is a complicated disease frequently accompanied by coronary artery disease (CAD) though no clear guidelines exist for when concomitant revascularization should be undertaken once valve surgery is indicated. Data on this topic within the United States (US) Veteran population, who have unique healthcare needs when compared to the civilian population, is sparse. We investigated the impact of concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) on morbidity and mortality in US Veterans requiring surgical management of IE. We identified 489 patients who underwent surgical management of IE between January 1 2010 and December 31 2020 at any of 43 Veterans Affairs (VA) cardiac surgery centers in the US. Patients were stratified based on who underwent concomitant CABG at the time of operation. Primary outcomes included the occurrence of postoperative myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, or mortality. Continuous variables were compared using independent t-tests or Mann Whitney U tests, and categorical variables were compared using the Chi square test. Cox proportional-hazard models were used to calculate risk for primary outcomes based on group. 61 patients (12.5%) underwent concomitant CABG for CAD. After adjusting for significant covariates, patients who underwent CABG had a higher long-term risk of MI (adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) 2.37, 95% CI: 1.29-4.35, p = 0.005) and higher risk of MI at 30-days (aHR 2.34, 95% CI: 1.06-5.19, p = 0.035). Concomitant CABG was not associated with long-term stroke or death, 30-day stroke or death, or perioperative complications. On sub-analysis of patients with moderate to severe CAD, rates of MI were higher in the CABG group at 30 days (25.9 vs. 3.4%, p = 0.016) and 1 year (33.3 vs. 3.4%, p = 0.004), though not long-term. The mean number of grafts was 1.51 ± 0.76, with only one graft performed in 65.6% (40/61) of patients. Concomitant CABG at the time of operation for IE was associated with increased risk of MI at 30-day and long-term, though most CABGs involved a low number of grafts. It was not associated with 30-day stroke or death, long term stroke or death, or perioperative complications. The optimal treatment of CAD noted during preoperative evaluation for veterans undergoing surgery for IE remains unclear.

The Effect of Gender on Triple Heart Valve Surgery Outcomes; Reinforcing Women's Health.

Female gender is a risk factor in several cardiac surgery risk stratification systems. This study explored the differences in the outcomes following triple heart valve surgery in men vs women. The study included 250 patients (males n = 101; females n = 149) who underwent triple valve surgery from 2009 to 2020. BMI (body mass index) was higher in females (29.6 vs 26.5kg/m2, P < .001), and diabetes was more common in males (44 vs 42%, P = .012). The ejection fraction was higher in females (55 vs 50%, P < .001). The severity of mitral valve stenosis and tricuspid valve regurgitation was significantly greater in females (33.11 vs 27.72%, P = .003 and 44.30 vs 19.8%, P < .001, respectively). Mitral valve replacement was more common in females (P < .001), and they had lower concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting (P = .001). Bleeding and renal failure were lower in females (P = .021 and <0.001, respectively). Hospital mortality, readmission, and reintervention were not significantly different between genders. By multivariable analysis, male gender was a risk factor for lower survival [HR (hazard ratio): 2.18; P = .024]. Triple valve surgery can be performed safely in both genders, with better long-term survival in females. Female gender was not a risk factor in patients undergoing triple valve surgery.

New approach for combined aortic valve and coronary procedures through the left anterior minithoracotomy.

We have developed a novel technique for accessing the aortic valve (AoV) through the left anterior minithoracotomy (LAmT). This approach has been used in patients requiring both AoV surgery and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). From April 2023 to July 2023, we performed 6 concomitant AoV procedures and CABG through the LAmT. The mean age was 71.5 [standard deviation (SD): 5.8; 64; 82] years, and the mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 53% (SD: 12.1; 30; 60). Surgical technique includes LAmT in the fourth intercostal space, peripheral cardiopulmonary bypass, aortic cross-clamping using transthoracic clamp, cold blood cardioplegia, conventional oblique aortotomy and special surgical exposure manoeuvres, aimed to position the ascending aorta and AoV close to the surgical incision. AoV was effectively visualized and the procedure was performed as planned in all 6 patients. No conversion to sternotomy was required. AoV replacement with biological prosthesis was performed in 6 (100%) patients. Conventional surgical instruments were used in all cases. The long-shafted instruments were not required. Knot-pusher was used in 4 (67%)cases. Concomitant complete revascularization was achieved in all cases. The mean number of distal anastomosis was 2.0 (SD: 0.6; 1; 3). Total operation time was 371 (SD: 43; 300; 420) min, cardiopulmonary bypass time was 253 (SD: 36; 193; 284) min and cross-clamp time was - 162 (SD: 29; 128; 214) min. intensive care unit stay was-1.5 (SD: 0.55; 1; 2) days, total hospital stay was-7.3 (SD: 1; 6; 9) days. There were no revisions for bleeding, no strokes or other major complications, and no hospital or 30-days mortality. The simultaneous performance of AoV replacement and multivessel CABG through a single left anterior thoracotomy is technically feasible and can be carried out by experienced surgeons. However, a larger number of cases are required to fully comprehend the potential limitations of this procedure.

The Clinical Significance of Unplanned Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Aortic Root Replacement

ObjectivesUnexpected coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is occasionally required during aortic root replacement (ARR). However, the impact of unplanned CABG remains unknown. DesignSingle center, retrospective observational study. SettingA university-affiliated tertiary hospitals. ParticipantsAll patients who underwent ARR from 2011 through 2022 InterventionsARR with or without unplanned CABG Measurements and Main ResultsA total of 795 patients underwent ARR. Among them, 131 (16.5%) underwent planned concomitant CABG and 34 (4.3%) required unplanned CABG. The most common indication of unplanned CABG was ventricular dysfunction (33.3%), followed by disease pathology (25.6%), anatomy (15.4%), and surgical complications (10.3%). A vein graft to the right coronary artery was the most commonly performed bypass. Infective endocarditis and aortic dissection were observed in 27.8% and 12.8%, respectively. Prior cardiac surgery was seen in 40.3%. The median follow-up period was 4.3 years. Unplanned CABG was not associated with operative mortality (OR 1.54, 95% CI 0.33-7.16, P = .58) or long-term mortality (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.44-1.89, P = .81). Body surface area smaller than 1.7 was independently associated with an increased risk of unplanned CABG (OR 4.51, 95% CI 1.85-11.0, P < .001). ConclusionsUnplanned CABG occurred in 4.3% during ARR but was not associated with operative mortality or long-term mortality. A small body surface area was a factor associated with unplanned CABG.

Concomitant Valve Replacement and Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Surgery: Lessons from the Past, Guidance for the Future? A Mortality Analysis in 294 Patients.

The aims of this study were to analyze parameters influencing early and late mortality after concomitant valve replacement and coronary artery bypass grafting surgery, using early and long-term information from an institutionally available data registry, and to discuss the results in relation to the current treatment strategies and perspectives. The study population consisted of 294 patients after combined valve replacement with mechanical prosthesis and CABG surgery. There were 201 men (68.4%) and 93 women (31.6%). Concurrent to the coronary artery bypass grafting, 238 patients (80.9%) underwent aortic-, 46 patients (15.6%) mitral- and 10 patients (3.4%) doublevalve replacement. Cumulative duration of follow up was 1007 patient-years (py) with a maximum of 94 months and was completed in 92.2% (271 cases). Overall hospital mortality (30 days) rate was 6.5% (n = 19). It was significantly higher in patients of female gender, older than 70 y, in those suffering preoperative myocardial infarction, presenting with an additive EuroScore > 8 and being hemodynamically unstable after the operation. Cumulative survival rate at 7.6 y was 78.6%. Determinants of prolonged survival were male gender, age at operation < 70 y, preoperative sinus rhythm, normal renal function, additive EuroScore < 8 and the use of internal thoracic artery for grafting. Subsequent multivariate analysis revealed preoperative atrial fibrillation (HR: 2.1, 95% CI: 0.82-5.44, p: 0.01) and risk group of ES > 8 (HR: 3.63, 95% CI: 1.45-9.07, p < 0.01) as independent predictors for lower long-term survival. Hospital mortality (30 d) was nearly 2.5-fold higher in female and/or older than 70 y patients. Preoperative atrial fibrillation and/ or a calculated ES > 8 were independent predisposing factors of late mortality for combined VR and CABG surgery. Tailoring the approach, with the employment of the newest techniques and hybrid procedures, to the individual patient clinical profile enables favorable outcomes for concomitant valvular disease and CAD, especially in high-risk patients.

Minimally Invasive Trans-Axillary versus Full Sternotomy Mitral Valve Repair: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis on Mid-Term Outcomes.

Background and Objectives: Minimally invasive cardiac surgery is an established approach for the treatment of heart valve pathologies and is associated with excellent technical and early postoperative outcomes. Data from medium- and long-term longitudinal evaluation of patients who underwent mitral valve repair (MVr) through transaxillary approach (TAxA) are still lacking. The aim of this study is to investigate mid-term results in patients who underwent TAxA MVr. Materials and Methods: Prospectively collected data of patients who underwent first-time MVr for MV regurgitation between 2017 and 2022, were reviewed. A total of 308 patients received TAxA, while in 220 cases, traditional full sternotomy (FS) was performed. Concomitant aortic and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) procedures, infective endocarditis or urgent operations were excluded. A propensity match (PS) analysis was used to overcome preoperative differences between the populations. Follow-up data were retrieved from outpatients' clinic, telephone calls and municipal administration records. Results: After PS-matching, two well-balanced cohorts of 171 patients were analysed. The overall 30-day mortality rate was 0.6% in both cohorts. No statistical difference in postoperative complications was reported. TAxA cohort experienced earlier postoperative extubation (p < 0.001) with a higher rate of extubation performed in the operating theatre (p < 0.001), shorter intensive care unit (ICU) stay (p < 0.001), and reduced hospitalization with 51% of patients discharged home (p < 0.001). Estimated survival at 5 years was 98.8% in TAxA vs. 93.6% in FS cohort (Log rank p = 0.15). The cumulative incidence of reoperation was 2.6% and 4.4% at 5 years, respectively, in TAxA and FS cohorts (Gray test p = 0.49). Conclusions: TAxA approach for MVr was associated with low rates of in-hospital mortality and major postoperative complications being furthermore associated with shorter mechanical ventilation time, shorter ICU stay and reduced hospitalization with a higher rate of patients able to be discharged home. At mid-term, TAxA was associated with excellent survival and low rate of MV reoperation.

New approach to the mitral valve through the left anterior minithoracotomy for combined valve and coronary surgical procedures

ObjectiveWe have developed a new technique for accessing the mitral valve through the left anterior minithoracotomy. This approach has been used in patients requiring both mitral valve surgery and coronary artery bypass grafting. MethodsFrom October 2020 to September 2022, we performed 24 concomitant mitral valve procedures and coronary artery bypass grafting through the left anterior minithoracotomy. The average age of the patients was 65.5 years, and the mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 44.5%. Computed tomography angiography was routinely performed preoperatively. The surgical technique included a left anterior minithoracotomy in the fourth intercostal space, peripheral cardiopulmonary bypass, aortic crossclamping using a transthoracic clamp through the additional port in the left second intercostal space, the administration of cold blood cardioplegia, a right atrial transseptal approach to the mitral valve, and special surgical exposure maneuvers. These maneuvers were designed to displace the heart into the left pleural space by pulling the inferior vena cava tape and the ascending aorta tape to the left. Conventional mitral valve surgical techniques were used. The mitral valve repair or replacement was performed after the distal anastomoses to the right and circumflex coronary system were completed. Subsequently, after the mitral valve procedure, coronary anastomosis to the left anterior descending artery was performed. ResultsThe mitral valve was effectively visualized, and a planned procedure was successfully completed in all patients. There was no need for conversion to a sternotomy. mitral valve repair was performed in 22 patients (91.7%), and mitral valve replacement was performed in 2 patients (8.3%). Conventional surgical instruments were used in 10 cases (41%), and long-shafted instruments were used in 14 cases (59%). A knot-pusher was required in 9 cases (37.5%). A computed tomography distance from the skin level to the mitral valve posterior annulus of more than 14 cm was identified as a technical difficulty marker, necessitating the use of long-shafted instruments. Concomitant complete revascularization was achieved in all cases. The mean number of distal anastomoses was 2.54 ± 0.7 (1; 4). Total operation time was 341 ± 41 (285; 420) minutes, cardiopulmonary bypass time was 231 ± 38 (172; 316) minutes, and the crossclamp time was 127 ± 23 (80; 169) minutes. Patients had a mean intensive care unit stay of 1.87 ± 0.69 (1; 4) days, and their total hospital stay averaged 6.54 ± 1.86 (4; 10) days. There were no reoperations due to bleeding, no occurrences of strokes, and no other major complications. There were no instances of hospital mortality or mortality within 30 days after the procedures. ConclusionsMitral valve repair or replacement through the left anterior thoracotomy and transseptal approach is a valuable and effective technique that can be used for concomitant procedures performed through a single minithoracotomy incision in selected patients.

Multifocal disease progression and subsequent intervention in patients with actin alpha-2 variants: A single-center experience

ObjectivesTo describe patient characteristics and indications for surgical intervention, reoperation, and outcomes in patients with actin alpha-2 (ACTA2) variants. MethodsA single-center retrospective cohort study with prospective follow-up was performed for 38 patients with an ACTA2 variant. ResultsFrom 1999 to 2020, 26 (70%) patients underwent surgery; 11 remain under surveillance (mean follow-up, 7.5 ± 5 years). Median age at index operation was 42 (range, 10-69) years, with 4 pediatric cases. Thoracic aortic aneurysm was present in 19 (73%) patients (mean adult max diameter, 5.2 ± 0.8 cm; pediatric z score, 10.7 ± 5.4). Aortic dissection was present in 13 (50%) patients, with 4 (15%) having type A dissection. Operations included replacement of the aortic root in 16 (17%), ascending aorta in 20 (77%), and aortic arch in 14 (54%) patients. Four (15%) patients had coronary artery disease, and 2 (7.7%) underwent concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting. There was no operative mortality, stroke, reoperation for bleeding, or dialysis-dependent renal failure; One (3.8%) patient developed acute on chronic kidney injury. Three patients (12%) required prolonged ventilation. Eleven (42%) patients underwent 26 reoperations, median time 45 (range, 4-147) months, including 5 open thoracoabdominal aneurysm repairs. ConclusionsPatients with ACTA2 variants frequently develop aortic aneurysm and are at risk of aortic dissection and coronary artery disease. However, age at diagnosis and symptoms at presentation are highly variable. Multiple operations are often required for disease management, particularly after dissection. Close monitoring and timely intervention are important in mitigating disease progression and improving outcomes.

Midterm follow-up of composite graft replacement of the aortic root (30-year experience)—remarkably safe, effective, and durable

ObjectivesContemporary operative choices for aortic root disease include aortic root replacement (ARR) and a variety of valve-sparing and aortic root-repair procedures. We evaluate ultra-long-term outcomes of ARR, focusing on survival, freedom from late reoperation, and adverse events. MethodsProspectively kept records were used to accomplish long-term follow-up of patients who underwent ARR (4-pronged Yale survival assessment paradigm). ResultsBetween 1990 and 2020, 564 patients underwent ARR (mean 56 years, 84% male). A modified Cabrol procedure (Dacron coronary graft) was employed in 9.0% (51/564) and concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting in 9.4% (53/564). There were 12.8% (72/564) urgent/emergent and 7.4% (42/564) redo procedures. Operative mortality occurred in 12 patients (2.1%) overall, or 1.4% (8/554) of nondissection and 1.3% (6/468) of elective first-time operations. Six of the 12 deaths presented with acute type A dissection, urgent operation, or reoperative states. Operative mortality dropped to 0.6% during the past 10 years. In total, 11 patients developed endocarditis. Stroke occurred in 11 of 564 patients (2.0%), 4 of whom had presented with type A dissection. Late events included bleeding in 2.8% (16/564), thromboembolism in 1.4% (8/564), and reoperation of the root in 5 of 564 (0.9%) at 15 years and more distal aortic segments in 16/564 (2.8%). Survival was no different from age/sex-matched controls. ConclusionsThis ultra-long-term experience finds ARR to be extraordinarily safe, effective, and durable, with minimal long-term bleeding, thromboembolism, or graft failure. This experience provides a standard of durability for ARR against which ultra-long-term outcomes with alternate procedures (valve-sparing, Ross, other) may be compared.

Surgical repair of post myocardial infarction ventricular septal defect: a retrospective analysis of a single institution experience

IntroductionVentricular septal defect (VSD) is a mechanical complication of acute myocardial infarction (MI) with a very high mortality, despite advances in surgical and circulatory support. The tremendous hemodynamic disturbance and the severely fragile myocardium render surgical repair a great challenge. The optimal time of surgical repair with or without circulatory support is still controversial.ObjectiveThe aim of this study is to review our experience with early surgical repair of post-MI VSD in a single major cardiac institution in China.MethodsFrom January 2013 to October 2020, 9consecutive patients presented to our emergency department with a diagnosis of post-MI VSD. Among them, 8 were male, and the mean age was 58 ± 7years. The mean VSD size was 22.5 ± 5.7 mm. In all patients, an intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP)was inserted immediately after admission to cardiac surgery service. All patients were operated at a mean of 3.3 ± 2.9 days, and 4 within 24 h of the rupture (range 1 to 9 days post-VSD). In 5 cases, the VSD was located superiorly, and 4 cases in the posterior septum.ResultsThe overall 30-day mortality was 11% (1/9). Coronary angiography was performed in all nine patients, four with single vessel disease had coronary stents implanted, and the other five received concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting during VSD repair surgery. There was no death in all 5 patients with anterior septal perforation. One patient with posterior septal perforation died in the operating room due to bleeding from the ventriculotomy site. Three survived patients were diagnosed with a small residual defect and mild left to right shunt post-repair. However, no further intervention was required, and patients remained asymptomatic (Killip II in 1 and III in 2).ConclusionIn our experience, immediate insertion of IABP and hemodynamic stabilization with early surgical intervention of VSD repair and concomitant coronary revascularization provided an 89% survival rate.

Outcomes of Concomitant Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Patients With Infective Endocarditis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

It is current practice to perform concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in patients with infective endocarditis who have relevant coronary artery disease. However, CABG may add complexity to the operation. We performed a systematic review and a meta-analysis of studies that presented outcomes from patients who underwent valve surgery because of infective endocarditis with or without concomitant CABG. Three databases were assessed. Perioperative mortality was the primary outcome. Long-term mortality and postoperative stroke were the secondary outcomes. Inverse variance method and random model were performed. Five studies with a total of 5,408 patients were included. Mean follow-up was 8.2years. Just 1 study addressed exclusively patients with documented coronary artery disease. Perioperative mortality did not differ between patients with or without concomitant CABG (odds ratio 1.53, 95% confidence interval 0.52 to 4.48, p=0.44). Long-term mortality did not differ between patients who received and those who did not receive concomitant CABG (odds ratio 1.79, confidence interval 0.88 to 3.65, p=0.11). Only 1 study from a multicenter registry reported data on the occurrence of postoperative stroke, which demonstrated that its incidence after adjustment was 26% in patients with concomitant CABG versus 21% in patients without concomitant CABG (p=0.003). The results suggest that in endocarditis patients, adding CABG to valve surgery does not affect perioperative or long-term mortality. Data available on the impact of concomitant CABG on neurologic outcomes are limited to a retrospective multicenter registry and suggest that concomitant CABG may be associated with higher postoperative stroke.

Aortic Valve Replacement with Single-Strip Autologous Pericardium.

Aortic valve replacement with mechanical valves is the standard treatment for aortic valve disease in Indonesia. Its usage is associated with high cost, risk of endocarditis and thromboembolic event, and lifetime consumption of anticoagulants. We performed a novel replacement technique of the aortic valve using an autologous pericardium and evaluated the short-term outcomes. From April 2017 to April 2020, 16 patients underwent aortic valve replacement with a single-strip autologous pericardium. Outcomes of the left ventricular reverse remodeling (LVRR), 6-minute walk test (6MWT), and soluble suppression of tumorigenicity-2 (sST-2) were measured at 6 months postoperation. A total of 16 surgeries were performed using aortic valve replacement with single-strip pericardium without conversion to mechanical valve replacement. The patients included eight males and eight females, and the mean age was 49.63 ± 12.54 years. The most common diagnosis was mixed aortic valve stenosis and regurgitation (9 cases). Five patients underwent a concomitant coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) procedure and 12 patients underwent either mitral or tricuspid valve repair. The mean aortic cross-clamp time was 139.88 ± 23.21 minutes and cardiopulmonary bypass time was 174.37 ± 33.53 minutes. At 6 months postoperation, there was an increase in the distance walked at the 6MWT (p = 0.006) and a decrease of the sST-2 level (p = 0.098). Echocardiogram showed two patients had LVRR. Survival and freedom from reoperation are 100% at 1 year of follow-up. Aortic valve replacement with a single strip of pericardium is a good alternative to aortic valve replacement with a mechanical valve. Short-term evaluation at 6 months postoperation showed improvement in clinical status and echocardiographic parameters compared to baseline.

Long-Term Survival among Octogenarians Undergoing Aortic Valve Replacement with or without Simultaneous Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A 22-Year Tertiary Single-Center Experience.

The impact of concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) on aortic valve replacement (AVR) in octogenarians is still debated. We analyzed the characteristics and long-term survival of octogenarians undergoing isolated AVR and AVR + CABG. All octogenarians who consecutively underwent AVR with or without concomitant CABG at our tertiary cardiac center between 2000 and 2022 were included. Patients with redo, emergent, or any other concomitant procedures were excluded. The primary endpoints were 30-day and long-term survival. The secondary endpoints were early postoperative outcomes and determinants of long-term survival. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify independent predictors of 30-day mortality, and Cox regression analysis was performed for predictors of adverse long-term survival. A total of 1011 patients who underwent AVR (83.0 [81.0-85.0] years, 42.0% males) and 1055 with AVR + CABG (83.0 [81.2-85.4] years, 66.1% males) were included in our study. Survival at 30 days and at 1, 3, and 5 years in the AVR group was 97.9%, 91.5%, 80.5%, and 66.2%, respectively, while in the AVR + CABG group it was 96.2%, 89.6%, 77.7%, and 64.7%, respectively. There was no significant difference in median postoperative survival between the AVR and AVR + CABG groups (7.1 years [IQR: 6.7-7.5] vs. 6.6 years [IQR: 6.3-7.2], respectively, p = 0.21). Significant predictors of adverse long-term survival in the AVR group included age (hazard ratio (HR): 1.09; 95% CI: 1.06-1.12, p < 0.001), previous MI (HR: 2.08; 95% CI: 1.32-3.28, p = 0.002), and chronic kidney disease (HR 2.07; 95% CI: 1.33-3.23, p = 0.001), while in the AVR + CABG group they included age (HR: 1.06; 95% CI: 1.04-1.10, p < 0.001) and diabetes mellitus (HR: 1.48; 95% CI: 1.15-1.89, p = 0.002). Concomitant CABG was not an independent risk factor for adverse long-term survival (HR: 0.89; 95% CI: 0.77-1.02, p = 0.09). The long-term survival of octogenarians who underwent AVR or AVR + CABG was similar and was not affected by adding concomitant CABG. However, octogenarians who underwent concomitant CABG with AVR had significantly higher in-hospital mortality. Each decision should be discussed within the heart team.

Totally endoscopic trans-mitral removal of a left ventricular apical thrombus through right thoracotomy in a patient with subacute anterior myocardial infarction: a case report

BackgroundLeft ventricular thrombosis confers a life-threatening risk of systemic embolism; therefore, it requires prompt intervention. Although anticoagulation is the primary treatment, surgery is indicated in instances of large or/and mobile thrombus or when there is potential for recovery of ventricular contraction. However, standard left ventriculoplasty with thrombectomy carries risks of cardiac dysfunction due to left ventriculotomy.Case presentationA 70-year-old man developed chest pain and vomiting 3 weeks before presenting to our hospital. A chest radiograph showed substantial cardiomegaly and mild pulmonary congestion; N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (5698 ng/L) was substantially increased, and troponin T (56 ng/L) levels were slightly above reference values. Transthoracic echocardiography showed akinesis of the anteroseptal and apical segments with an ejection fraction reduced to approximately 20%. We diagnosed subacute myocardial infarction and initiated pharmacotherapy. On hospital day 7, coronary angiography revealed a left anterior descending artery lesion with 99% stenosis; percutaneous coronary intervention was successfully performed the next day. That same day, transthoracic echocardiography revealed a large mobile left ventricular apical thrombus without any left ventricular aneurysm, and heparin therapy was initiated. On hospital day 10, three-dimensional computed tomography confirmed the location of an apical thrombus, and we planned a fourth intercostal approach. A thrombectomy was performed on hospital day 11 using an endoscopic trans-mitral approach with a right thoracotomy to avoid a left ventriculotomy. The patient was discharged from intensive care on postoperative day 2 under heparin and warfarin therapy. The subsequent postoperative course was uneventful, and he was discharged on postoperative day 14 with a vitamin K antagonist. At the 6-month follow-up, there was no recurrence of thrombus in the left ventricle and Ejection Fraction had improved to 46%.ConclusionsTotally endoscopic thrombectomy via a trans-mitral approach through right thoracotomy was effective for a left ventricular thrombus. When concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting or left ventriculoplasty are not required, this procedure can be an effective option.

Trends and outcomes of concomitant aortic valve replacement and coronary artery bypass grafting in the UK and a survey of practices.

Concomitant revascularization of coronary artery disease at the same time as treatment for aortic valvopathy favourably impacts survival. However, combined surgery may be associated with increased adverse outcomes compared to aortic valve replacement (AVR) or coronary artery bypass grafting in isolation. We retrospectively analyzed all patients who underwent AVR with bypass grafting between February 1996 and March 2019 using data from the National Adult Cardiac Surgery Audit. We used a generalized mixed-effects model to assess the effect of the number and type of bypass grafts associated with surgical AVR on in-hospital mortality, postoperative stroke, and the need for renal dialysis. Furthermore, we conducted an international cross-sectional survey of cardiac surgeons to explore their views about concomitant AVR with coronary bypass grafting interventions. Fifty-one thousand two hundred and seventy-two patients were included in the study. Patients receiving 2 or more bypass grafts demonstrated more significant preoperative comorbidity and disease severity. Patients undergoing 2 and >2 grafts in addition to AVR had increased mortality as compared to patients undergoing AVR and only 1 graft [odds ratio (OR) 1.17, 95% confidence interval (CI) [1.05-1.30], P = 0.005 and OR 1.15, 95% CI [1.02-1.30], P = 0.024 respectively]. A single arterial conduit was associated with a reduction in mortality (OR 0.75, 95% CI [0.68-0.82], P < 0.001) and postoperative dialysis (OR 0.87, 95% CI [0.78-0.96], P = 0.006), but this association was lost with >1 arterial conduit. One hundred and three surgeons responded to our survey, with only a small majority believing that the number of bypass grafts can influence short- or long-term postoperative outcomes in these patients, and an almost equal split in responders supporting the use of staged or hybrid interventions for patients with concomitant pathology. The number of grafts performed during combined AVR and coronary artery bypass grafting is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. The use of an arterial graft was also associated with reduced mortality. Future studies are needed to assess the effect of incomplete revascularization and measure long-term outcomes. Based on our data, current published evidence, and the collective expert opinion we gathered, we endorse future work to investigate the short and long-term efficacy and safety of hybrid intervention for patients with concomitant advanced coronary and aortic valve disease.

Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation After Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: Amiodarone and Warfarin Use

IntroductionThe association between amiodarone treatment for postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) after surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) and both the return to normal sinus rhythm (NSR) and anticoagulation use at discharge has not been extensively studied. MethodsWe retrospectively identified all patients who underwent biological SAVR with or without concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) at a Veterans Affairs Medical Center (2005-2015). We reviewed new-onset POAF, amiodarone use, return to NSR, and anticoagulation use with warfarin. Discharge rhythm and warfarin administration were compared among patients with POAF who were treated with amiodarone and patients who did not receive amiodarone. ResultsOf the 395 patients (186 AVR/coronary artery bypass grafting; 209 AVR) studied, POAF developed in 191 patients (48.0%); 80.1% (153/191) of these patients received amiodarone. Among patients treated with amiodarone, 70.6% (108/153) were in SR at the time of discharge versus 65.8% (25/38) of POAF patients who were not treated with amiodarone (P = 0.57). Among amiodarone-treated patients, 30.7% (47/153) were discharged with warfarin; among patients not treated with amiodarone, 31.6% (12/38) were discharged with warfarin (P = 0.92). Among amiodarone-treated patients discharged in NSR, 89.9% (97/108 patients) were not discharged with warfarin; among patients not treated with amiodarone who were discharged in NSR, 92% (23/25) were not discharged with warfarin (P = 0.74). ConclusionsPOAF after SAVR appears common. Although amiodarone is often used for POAF patients, its use does not appear to be associated with surgeons' decision to anticoagulate patients. Surgeons’ preferences for using rhythm control and antithrombotic therapy for POAF after SAVR warrant further exploration.

Novel concept of less invasive concomitant surgical aortic valve replacement and coronary artery bypass grafting avoiding full median sternotomy.

In the last decades, minimally invasive procedures have been developed in the therapy of aortic valve disorders. Recently, a novel concept of minimally invasive coronary revascularization in multivessel disease via left anterior mini-thoracotomy demonstrated promising results. Full median sternotomy, as a very invasive procedure, is the standard approach in concomitant surgical aortic valve replacement (sAVR) and coronary bypass grafting (CABG). The aim of our study was to show that the combination of minimal invasive aortic valve replacement via upper mini-sternotomy and coronary artery bypass grafting via left anterior mini-thoracotomy is feasible to avoid full median sternotomy. From 07/2022 to 09/2022, concomitant sAVR via upper partial sternotomy and CABG via left anterior mini-thoractomy on cardiopulmonary bypass and cardioplegic arrest was successfully performed in six consecutive patients (6 males; 69.8 ± 7.4 [60-79] years). All patients had severe aortic stenosis (MPG 45.5 ± 17.3mmHg) and a significant coronary artery disease (three-vessel: 33%, two-vessel: 33%, one-vessel: 33%) with indication to cardiac surgery. Mean EuroScore2 was 3.2. All patients underwent successful less invasive concomitant biological sAVR and CABG. 67% of patients received a 25mm, 33% received a 23mm biological aortic valve replacement (Edwards Lifesciences Perimount). A total of 11 distal anastomoses (1.8 ± 1.0 [1-3] per patient) were performed by using left internal artery mammary (50%), radial artery (17%) and saphenous venous graft (67%) for grafting the left anterior descending (83%), circumflex (67%) and right (33%) coronary artery. Hospital mortality was 0%, stroke rate was 0%, myocardial infarction was 0% and repeat revascularization rate was 0%, ICU stay was 1day in 83% of all patients and 50% left hospital within 8days after surgery. Less invasive concomitant surgical aortic valve replacement and coronary artery bypass grafting using upper mini-sternotomy and left anterior mini-thoracotomy is feasible without compromises in surgical principles and complete coronary revascularization while maintaining thoracic stability by avoiding full median sternotomy.

Comparison of Repair vs Replacement in Calcific and Rheumatic Mitral Disease

BackgroundThe benefit of repair over replacement of rheumatic or calcified mitral valve (MV) is debatable. MethodsPatients who underwent MV repair or replacement for rheumatic or calcified MV disease between 2006 and 2020 were identified in the Polish National Registry of Cardiac Surgery Procedures. Patients who underwent additional procedures other than coronary artery bypass grafting or tricuspid valve surgery, as well as redo or emergency cases, were excluded. The long-term survival was verified based on National Health Fund registry data. The survival was compared between MV repair and replacement in the whole cohort and after propensity score matching. ResultsWe included 4338 patients: 1859 (43%) with pure mitral regurgitation and 2479 (57%) with mitral stenosis. MV was repaired in 543 patients (29%) with pure regurgitation and 126 (5.1%) with stenosis (P < .001). In total, 984 (23%) patients underwent concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting and 1358 (32%) tricuspid valve surgery. MV repair improved survival (hazard ratio 0.81; 95% CI 0.68-0.97; P = .022) in patients with no mitral stenosis, and had no effect in mitral stenosis (hazard ratio 1.17; 95% CI 0.85-1.59; P = .332). The results were confirmed in propensity-matched cohorts. The freedom from MV reoperation at 10 years was 95.5% ± 1.2% after repair and 96.0% ± 0.7% after MV replacement (P = .416) in the absence of stenosis and 91.8% ± 3.4% after repair vs 95.9% ± 0.5% after replacement in patients with mitral stenosis (P = .065). ConclusionsRepair of rheumatic/calcified mitral valve should be a preferred option in patients with no mitral stenosis, but confers no benefit if mitral stenosis is present.