ObjectiveThis study assesses the utility of jitter analysis with concentric needles to evaluate disease severity in myasthenia gravis (MG), correlate changes in jitter with clinical status as well as identify reasons for any discordance. MethodsWe performed a retrospective chart review of 82 MG patients and extracted data on demographics, MG subtype, antibody status, clinical scales, electrophysiology, and interventions at baseline and follow-up. ResultsBaseline MGII scores correlated with jitter (r = 0.25, p = 0.024) and abnormal pairs (r = 0.24, p = 0.03). After 28 months, MGII scores correlated with jitter (r = 0.31, p = 0.006), abnormal pairs (r = 0.29, p = 0.009), and pairs with blocks (r = 0.35, p = 0.001). Changes in MGII scores correlated with changes in jitter (r = 0.35, p = 0.002), abnormal pairs (r = 0.27, p = 0.014), and pairs with blocks (r = 0.36, p = 0.001). ConclusionsConcentric needle jitter analysis may have the potential to evaluate baseline and sequential disease severity in MG. SignificanceThis study highlights the potential for improved MG patient care through precise assessment and management using concentric needle jitter analysis to improve the accuracy of MG diagnosis and monitoring of disease activity.