Sulfadoxine Concentrations Research Articles

Drug-Drug Interaction Between Dihydroartemisinin-Piperaquine and Sulfadoxine-Pyrimethamine During Malaria Chemoprevention in Pregnant Women.

Co-administration of dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DP) and sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) for intermittent preventive treatment of malaria in pregnancy (IPTp) may be superior in preventing adverse birth outcomes compared with either therapy alone, but potential drug-drug interactions require investigation. We conducted intensive and sparse pharmacokinetic (PK) studies in a subset of Ugandan women participating in a randomized controlled trial of monthly IPTp with SP vs. DP vs. DP + SP. Intensive PK sampling was performed from day 0 to 23 after dosing at 28 weeks gestation in 87 participants across treatment arms. Sparse sampling was performed on day 28 (trough) after dosing at 20 and 28 gestational weeks in additional 196 participants receiving SP vs. DP + SP. Intensive PK analysis demonstrated that compared with SP alone, co-administration of DP + SP was associated with lower maximal concentrations, the area under the concentration-time curves (AUC), and day 23 concentrations of sulfadoxine (25%, 25%, and 27%) and pyrimethamine (26%, 34%, and 32%) (P < 0.05 for all comparisons). Sparse PK results demonstrated participants co-administered DP + SP had lower trough concentrations after dosing at 20 and 28 gestational weeks for sulfadoxine (6%, P = 0.68 and 31%, P = 0.023, respectively) and pyrimethamine (18%, P = 0.032 and 33%, P < 0.001, respectively) compared with SP alone. Co-administration of DP + SP was associated with a 19% reduction in piperaquine AUC (P = 0.046), but no significant difference in other PK parameters compared with DP alone. In summary, co-administration of DP + SP was associated with significantly reduced SP exposure, with a greater magnitude during the third vs. second trimester. The clinical consequences of this interaction are yet unknown.

Effect of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine doses for prevention of malaria during pregnancy in hypoendemic area in Tanzania

BackgroundMalaria in pregnancy increases the risk of deleterious maternal and birth outcomes. The use of ≥ 3 doses of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) for intermittent preventive treatment of malaria (IPTp-SP) is recommended for preventing the consequences of malaria during pregnancy. This study assessed the effect of IPTp-SP for prevention of malaria during pregnancy in low transmission settings.MethodsA cross-sectional study that involved consecutively selected 1161 pregnant women was conducted at Mwananyamala regional referral hospital in Dar es Salaam. Assessment of the uptake of IPTp-SP was done by extracting information from antenatal clinic cards. Maternal venous blood, cord blood, placental blood and placental biopsy were collected for assessment of anaemia and malaria. High performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection (HPLC-UV) was used to detect and quantify sulfadoxine (SDX). Dried blood spots (DBS) of placental blood were collected for determination of sub-microscopic malaria using polymerase chain reaction (PCR).ResultsIn total, 397 (34.2%) pregnant women reported to have used sub-optimal doses (≤ 2) while 764 (65.8%) used optimal doses (≥ 3) of IPTp-SP at the time of delivery. The prevalence of placental malaria as determined by histology was 3.6%. Submicroscopic placental malaria was detected in 1.4% of the study participants. Women with peripheral malaria had six times risk of maternal anaemia than those who were malaria negative (aOR, 5.83; 95% CI 1.10–30.92; p = 0.04). The geometric mean plasma SDX concentration was 10.76 ± 2.51 μg/mL. Sub-optimal IPTp-SP dose was not associated with placental malaria, premature delivery and fetal anaemia. The use of ≤ 2 doses of IPTp-SP increased the risk of maternal anaemia by 1.36-fold compared to ≥ 3 doses (aOR, 1.36; 95% CI 1.04–1.79; p = 0.02).ConclusionThe use of < 2 doses of IPTp-SP increased the risk of maternal anaemia. However, sub-optimal doses (≤ 2 doses) were not associated with increased the risk of malaria parasitaemia, fetal anaemia and preterm delivery among pregnant women in low malaria transmission setting. The use of optimal doses (≥ 3 doses) of IPTp-SP and complementary interventions should continue even in areas with low malaria transmission.

Pharmacokinetic Properties and Bioequivalence of Two Sulfadoxine/Pyrimethamine Fixed-Dose Combination Tablets: A Parallel-Design Study in Healthy Chinese Male Volunteers

BackgroundSulfadoxine/pyrimethamine fixed-dose combination (FDC) tablet is the long-acting portion of the antimalaria product Artecospe®, coblister containing artesunate tablets plus sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine FDC tablets. This study was conducted to support the efficacy and tolerability of the sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine FDC tablet in the World Health Organization's (WHO) Prequalification of Medicines Programme, as well as to obtain marketing authorization in China. ObjectiveThe aim of the present study was to compare the pharmacokinetic profiles between a new generic and the branded reference formulation of sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine FDC tablets, and to assess the bioequivalence of the 2 products in healthy Chinese volunteers. MethodsThis single-dose, open-label, randomized, parallel-group study was conducted in healthy Chinese male volunteers who were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive a single 1500/75-mg dose (3 × 500/25-mg tablets) of either the test or reference formulation after a 12-hour overnight fast. Seventeen blood samples were obtained over a 168-hour interval, and plasma concentrations of sulfadoxine and pyrimethamine were determined by 2 separate validated liquid chromatography–isotopic dilution mass spectrometry methods. Pharmacokinetic properties (Cmax, AUC0–72, AUC0–168, and Tmax) were calculated and analyzed statistically. The 2 formulations were to be considered bioequivalent if 90% CIs for the log-transformed ratios of Cmax and AUC0–72 were within the predetermined bioequivalence range of 80% to 125%, in accordance with the guidelines of WHO and China's Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Tolerability was evaluated throughout the study by vital signs, physical examinations, clinical laboratory tests, 12-lead ECGs, and subject interviews on adverse events (AEs). ResultsForty-six healthy subjects completed the study. The mean values of sulfadoxine Cmax (183.07 and 165.15 mg/L), AUC0–72 (11,036.52 and 10,536.78 mg/L/h), and AUC0–168 (22,247.05 and 21,761.02 mg/L/h) were not significantly different between the test and reference formulations, respectively. The same was true for pyrimethamine (0.55 and 0.58 mg/L, 29.85 and 31.44 mg/L/h, and 56.18 and 59.27 mg/L/h, respectively). The 90% CIs for the log-transformed ratios of Cmax, AUC0–72, and AUC0–168 of both sulfadoxine (105.4%–116.6%, 99.3%–110.6%, and 96.4%–108.1%) and pyrimethamine (88.8%–100.9%, 89.5%–101.0%, and 88.3%–101.6%) were within the acceptance limits for bioequivalence. A total of 7 mild AEs were reported in 7 subjects (15.2%). ConclusionsThe findings from this single-dose (1500/75-mg) study suggest that the test and reference formulations of sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine FDC 500/25-mg tablet have similar pharmacokinetic profiles both in terms of rate and extent of absorption. The formulations met WHO's and China's FDA regulatory criteria for bioequivalence in these healthy Chinese volunteers under fasting conditions. Both formulations were generally well-tolerated.

Pharmacokinetic Disposition of Sulfadoxine in Children with Acute Uncomplicated Falciparum Malaria Treated with Sulfadoxine–Pyrimethamine in South West Nigeria

Sulfadoxine (SDX)-pyrimethamine is currently recommended as a partner drug with artesunate in the chemotherapy of malaria. However, information on pharmacokinetic disposition of SDX-pyrimethamine in children is limited. Efforts in this study were thus devoted to evaluation of pharmacokinetic disposition of SDX using high-pressure liquid chromatographic techniques and effects of pharmacokinetic variability on treatment outcome in Nigerian children with falciparum malaria. The blood concentration profile of SDX was similar in patients whose infection responded to treatment and those who failed treatment; mean SDX concentration values were similar for day 3 (179 vs 157 μg/mL, P = 0.734), day 7 (84 vs 51 μg/mL, P = 0.365), and day 14 (50 vs 14 μg/mL, P = 0.151). Extent of exposure (area under the curve) to SDX was also similar in the patients (1196 vs 1013 μg d/mL, P = 0.561). Pearson's correlation, showed significant correlation between area under the curve and D3 or D7 concentration of SDX (P = 0.001, r = 0.702 or P = 0.001, r = 0.835, respectively). Age-stratified analysis showed that SDX concentrations were significantly higher in older children (older than 5 years); the mean maximum concentration (125 vs 295 μg/mL, P = 0.001), extent of exposure (812 vs 1562 μg d/mL, P = 0.001), day 3 concentration (98 vs 250 μg/mL, P = 0.001), and day 7 concentration (54 vs 128 μg/mL, P = 0.007) were higher. The study revealed no differences in posttreatment blood SDX concentrations in patients who responded to treatment and those who failed to respond to treatment. Furthermore, there was an age-related pharmacokinetic variability of SDX in the group of children studied with potential impact on treatment outcome.

Isolation and characterization of Pseudomonas sp. DX7 capable of degrading sulfadoxine

Given that the intensive application of sulfonamides in aquaculture, animal husbandry and malaria treatment has lead to an increase in sulfonamide discharge into the environment, there is an increasing need to find a way to remediate sulfonamide-contaminated sites. The bacterial strain DX7 was isolated from a marine environment and is capable of degrading sulfadoxine. DX7 was identified as a Pseudomonas sp. based on 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Approximately 30% of sulfadoxine was degraded after Pseudomonas sp. DX7 was inoculated into mineral salt plus tryptone media containing 10mgl(-1) sulfadoxine for 2 days. The degradation efficiency under different environmental conditions was characterized using HPLC. The optimal temperature and pH for sulfadoxine biodegradation were around 30°C and 6.0, respectively. The optimal concentrations of sulfadoxine and tryptone for sulfadoxine biodegradation were determined to be approximately 30mgl(-1) and between 2.0 and 8.0gl(-1), respectively. Cytotoxicity analysis indicated that the metabolites of sulfadoxine generated by Pseudomonas sp. DX7 showed significantly reduced cytotoxicity to Hela cells. These results suggest that Pseudomonas sp. DX7 is a new bacterial resource for degrading sulfadoxine and indicate the potential of the isolated strain in the bioremediation of sulfadoxine-contaminated environments.

Population Pharmacokinetics of Sulfadoxine and Pyrimethamine in Malawian Children With Malaria

In addition to parasite resistance, inadequate levels of exposure to antimalarial drugs may contribute to treatment failure. We developed population pharmacokinetic (PK) models to describe the distribution of sulfadoxine (SDX) and pyrimethamine (PYM) in children with uncomplicated malaria in Malawi. The concentration levels of antimalarial drugs in whole blood were determined using high-performance liquid chromatography. We found no evidence of underdosing in children as compared with adults; the children had drug exposure levels similar to those described in adults. Treatment failure was more likely in children with lower PYM concentrations on day 14 (P = 0.024), and there was a trend for lower SDX concentrations on day 14 (P = 0.061). SDX and PYM concentrations at levels predictive of treatment failure have been identified at day 14. Less than one-third of the children displayed drug concentration levels above these thresholds after receiving the recommended SDX-pyrimethamine (SP) dose. Our findings suggest that PK factors contributed to the observed high rate of treatment failure, and we therefore recommend a higher SP dose for children under the age of 5 years.

Sulfadoxine–pyrimethamine impairs Plasmodium falciparum gametocyte infectivity and Anopheles mosquito survival

Sulfadoxine–pyrimethamine (SP) is currently the drug of choice for intermittent preventive treatment of Plasmodium falciparum both in pregnancy and infancy. A prolonged parasite clearance time conferred by dhfr and dhps mutations is believed to be responsible for increased gametocyte prevalence in SP treated individuals. However, using a direct feeding assay in Mali, we showed that gametocytes present in peripheral venous blood post-SP treatment had reduced infectivity for Anopheles gambiae sensu stricto (ss) mosquitoes. We investigated the potential mechanisms involved in the dhfr and dhps quintuple mutant NF-135 and the single dhps 437 mutant NF-54. Concentrations of sulfadoxine (S) and pyrimethamine (P) equivalent to the serum levels of the respective drugs on day 3 (S = 61 μg/ml, P = 154.7 ng/ml) day 7 (S = 33.8 μg/ml, P = 66.6 ng/ml) and day 14 (S = 14.2 μg/ml, P = 15.7 ng/ml) post-SP treatment were used to study the effect on gametocytogenesis, gametocyte maturation and infectivity to Anopheles stephensi mosquitoes fed through an artificial membrane. The drugs readily induced gametocytogenesis in the mutant NF-135 strain but effectively killed the wild-type NF-54. However, both drugs impaired gametocyte maturation yielding odd-shaped non-exflagellating mature gametocytes. The concomitant ingestion of both S and P together with gametocytemic blood-meal significantly reduced the prevalence of oocyst positivity as well as oocyst density when compared to controls ( P < 0.001). In addition, day 3 concentrations of SP decreased mosquito survival by up to 65% ( P < 0.001). This study demonstrates that SP is deleterious in vitro for gametocyte infectivity as well as mosquito survival.

Population pharmacokinetics of chloroquine and sulfadoxine and treatment response in children with malaria: suggestions for an improved dose regimen

* Both chloroquine (CQ) and sulfadoxine/ pyrimethamine (SDx/PYR) remain important drugs in the control of malaria. * The available data on CQ, SDx and PYR are summary pharmacokinetic parameters based on classical/traditional methods, mostly in adults. * No study has described the population pharmacokinetics of a fixed-dose CQ + SDx/PYR combination in children with falciparum malaria. * This study presents population pharmacokinetic data on CQ and SDx in children with uncomplicated falciparum malaria. * The study demonstrates that in age-based fixed-dose regimens with CQ and SDx, drug exposures and outcomes may be correctly predicted, although correlation with body weight is poor. * The study proposes dose modification to improve response with the CQ + SDx/PYR combination. To describe the pharmacokinetics of chloroquine (CQ) and sulfadoxine (SDx), and to identify predictors of treatment response in children with malaria given the CQ + SDx and pyrimethamine (PYR) combination. Eighty-six Ugandan children with uncomplicated falciparum malaria, 6 months to 5 years old, were randomly treated with prepacked fixed-dose CQ + SDx/PYR. The youngest children (<24 months) received half strength and the older (>24 months) full strength treatment. The reported day 14 failure rates were 48% and 18%, respectively. Capillary blood (100 microl) applied on to filter paper was collected on eight occasions during 28 days of follow up. Concentrations of CQ and SDx were determined. A population approach was used for the pharmacokinetic analysis. A two-compartment model adequately described the data for both CQ and SDx. For CQ, the typical apparent clearance (CL/F) and volume of distribution (V(C)/F) values were estimated to be 2.84 l h(-1) and 230 l. The typical CL/F for SDx was 0.023 l h(-1), while the factor relating its V(C)/F to normalized body weight was 1.6 l kg(-1). Post hoc parameter estimates for both drugs showed lower maximum concentrations (C(max)) and concentration-time curve areas (AUC(0,336 h)) in younger children. The AUC(0,336 h) for SDx and CQ were independently significant factors for prediction of cure. Simulations suggest that giving the higher dose to the youngest children would result in higher CQ and SDx concentrations and improved outcome. The study results suggest that full-strength combination to all children would improve the cure rate.

High-performance liquid chromatographic assay for the determination of sulfadoxine and N-acetyl sulfadoxine in plasma from patients infected with sensitive and resistant Plasmodium falciparum malaria

A reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatographic method using a mobile phase of acetonitrile–methanol–trifluoroacetic acid–water (16.1:7.2:0.1:76.6, v/v/v/v) at a flow rate of 1.0 ml min −1 on a LiChrospher™ RP-18 column with UV (254 nm) detection has been developed for the separation of sulfadoxine and its metabolite N-acetyl sulfadoxine in plasma. No interferences due to endogenous compounds or common antimalarial drugs were noticed. The limit of detection for sulfadoxine and N-acetyl sulfadoxine was 0.01 μg ml −1 with a signal-to-noise ratio of 5:1 while the limit of quantification was 2.5 μg ml −1. Intra-day mean relative standard deviations (RSD's) for sulfadoxine and N-acetyl sulfadoxine were 2.6 and 2.8%, respectively, while mean inter-day RSD's for sulfadoxine and N-acetyl sulfadoxine were 2.4 and 2.8%, respectively. Extraction recoveries averaged 90.6% for sulfadoxine and 86.9% for N-acetyl sulfadoxine. The method was applied for the assay of sulfadoxine and its metabolite N-acetyl sulfadoxine in plasma from Plasmodium falciparum malaria patients. Mean plasma sulfadoxine concentrations on day 2 (51 h) from samples collected from sensitive and resistant P. falciparum patients treated with three tablets of Fansidar™ were 62.8 and 60.5 μg ml −1, respectively. Mean ratio of N-acetyl sulfadoxine to sulfadoxine was 9.1% for responders and 13.9% for non-responders which revealed that higher amounts of the metabolite N-acetyl sulfadoxine were present in non-responders. The method described should find an application in the therapeutic monitoring of malaria patients.

Continued efficacy of sulfadoxine–pyrimethamine as second line treatment for malaria in children in Guinea-Bissau

BackgroundSulfadoxine–pyrimethamine (S/P) is widely used for treatment of failures following the first line treatment for malaria in Africa. In Guinea-Bissau, it has been recommended as second line therapy by the National Malaria Programme since 1996. In order to monitor any change of the in vivo sensitivity, the efficacy of S/P was studied immediately before the introduction of the drug and 6–9 years later. MethodsChildren participating in clinical in vivo studies were given S/P if having late clinical treatment failure following the treatment with quinine, chloroquine, or amodiaquine. Parasitological and clinical failures were evaluated during a 35-day follow-up. During the first study period whole blood sulfadoxine concentrations were measured on day 7. ResultsAltogether, 56 children failed the initial treatment and were included in 1995/1996 as well as 55 children in 2002/2004. The PCR-uncorrected adequate clinical and parasitological response rates on day 28 were 94% and 91%, and on day 35 they were 89% and 91%, respectively, in the two periods. No difference between median blood drug concentration in children with and without treatment failure was observed. InterpretationThe efficacy of S/P as second line treatment for uncomplicated malaria has remained unchanged in spite of a relatively high level of genetic markers associated with Plasmodium falciparum resistance to S/P previously found in the area.

Concentrations of sulfadoxine and trimethoprim in plasma, lymph fluids and some tissues 24 h after intramuscular administration to angora goats

Summary This study was carried out to determine the concentrations of sulfadoxine and trimethoprim in plasma, lymph, and some tissues in goats after administration of a single recommended therapeutic dose. Five healthy, adult Angora goats were used. The drug combination, containing 200 mg sulfadoxine and 40 mg trimethoprim per millilitre, was given as a single IM injection at the recommended dose level, 15 mg/kg body weight for sulfadoxine and 3 mg/kg body weight for trimethoprim. The goats were slaughtered 24 hours after drug administration and samples were taken from liver, bone marrow, pelvic limb muscles, hepatic, thoracic duct, and the pelvic limb lymph fluids for analysis of drug concentrations by HPLC. The concentrations of trimethoprim in bone marrow, liver, pelvic limb muscles, hepatic lymph, the pelvic limb lymph, and thoracic duct lymph were found to be 6, 5, 4, 2, 5 and 15 times higher than those of plasma, respectively. Although the sulfadoxine concentrations in bone marrow, pelvic limb muscles, and liver were 2, 3 and 2 times higher than the plasm concentrations, respectively, the sulfadoxine concentrations in hepatic lymph, the pelvic limb lymph, and thoracic duct lymph were lower than those of plasma. The results show that the trimethoprim concentrations in lymph fluids were quite similar to those in tissues. However, the sulfadoxine concentrations in lymph fluids were different in each tissue.

Standard and reduced doses of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine for treatment of Plasmodium falciparum in Tanzania, with determination of drug concentrations and susceptibility in vitro

88 asymptomatic Tanzanian schoolchildren with Plasmodium falciparum parasitaemia were given all, half or quarter of the recommended standard therapeutic dose of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (Fansidar ®). All children cleared the parasites by day 3 and all remained negative during 28–42 days of follow-up. All 32 successful in vitro micro-tests showed full sensitivity. High performance liquid Chromatographic methods were applied for drug determinations. Using 100 μ1 capillary blood dried on filter paper for sulfadoxine determination the interindividual variation during follow-up of the standard dose group was 2–4 fold and the median half life was 8·9 d. Sulfadoxine concentrations in the half and quarter dose groups were roughly proportional to those in the standard dose group. The median whole blood to plasma concentration ratio for sulfadoxine was 0·72 and the correlation coefficient 0·95. There was only a weak correlation ( r = 0·46) between plasma concentrations of sulfadoxine and pyrimethamine. The uniform efficacy of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine in vivo, even when reduced doses were used, makes this combination a good alternative for treatment of P. falciparum in Tanzania.

Plasma concentrations of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine and of mefloquine during regular long term malaria prophylaxis

The plasma concentrations of sulfadoxine, pyrimethamine, mefloquine and its major metabolite were determined in 18 healthy male volunteers who had regularly taken either 500 mg of sulfadoxine and 25 mg of pyrimethamine (Fansidar ®) weekly or 250 mg mefloquine regularly every 14 d during 6 months for malaria prophylaxis. The mean trough concentrations of sulfadoxine, pyrimethamine and mefloquine were 194, 0·28 and 1·48 μmol/litre and the mean half lives were 7·7, 4·2 and 25 d respectively. The variation in area under the curve for the 3 drugs was only 2–3 fold. The findings do not indicate that drug accumulation or induction of metabolism occurred during long-term usage.

Sulfadoxine assay using capillary blood samples dried on filter paper--suitable for monitoring of blood concentrations in the field.

A high performance liquid chromatographic method for determination of sulfadoxine in whole blood obtained by finger prick and dried on filter paper is presented. The technique was validated by comparing the sulfadoxine concentration of simultaneously collected capillary blood dried on filter paper and conventional venous whole blood samples. Agreement between capillary blood dried on filter paper and venous whole blood was satisfactory. Limit of determination using 100 microliter of capillary blood was found to be 25 mumol/L (7.8 micrograms/ml). Sulfadoxine was stable in the dried filter papers for at least 15 weeks at +37 degrees C. The concentration ratio between plasma and whole blood of sulfadoxine was found to be approximately 1.8. The sampling technique on filter paper offers a convenient method for overcoming many of the practical problems of blood sampling in the field.

Pharmacokinetic rationale for a malarial suppressant administered once monthly.

Serum was collected from six adults participating in a field trial of sulfadoxine and pyrimethamine in combination which was being administered once monthly for malaria suppression. Samples were drawn during each of two consecutive months three hours, and 7, 14 and 28 days following a dose of 1 500 mg sulfadoxine. Serum sulfadoxine concentration was measured using the method of Bratton and Marshall (1939). Initial serum concentrations averaged 19-9 plus or minus 2-4 (SD) mg/100 ml and decayed to 6-2 plus or minus 2-8 mg/100 ml at 14 days. Serum sulfadoxine concentrations were still detectable at 28 days following a dose (2-1 plus or minus 1-5 mg/100 ml). Elimination half-time averaged 195 plus or minus 44 hours. The presistent serum concentrations of sulfadoxine following monthly doses documented here during field-use of this drug are in agreement with the successful clinical results reported for such a regimen (Lewis and Ponnampalam, 1974; O'Holohan and Hugoe-Mathews, 1971; Wolfensberger, 1971).