Neutralizing Antibody Concentrations Research Articles

A phase 2b, Randomized, double blinded comparison of the safety and efficacy of the monoclonal antibody mixture SYN023 and human rabies immune globulin in patients exposed to rabies

BackgroundSYN023 is an anti-rabies monoclonal antibody mixture administered as part of post-exposure prophylaxis regimens. The rabies virus neutralizing antibody (RVNA) concentration generally accepted as an adequate immune response to vaccination is ≥ 0.5 IU/mL. MethodsWithin 54 h of potential rabies exposure, 448 patients in two risk substrata of WHO Category III exposure were randomized to receive either 0.3 mg/kg SYN023 or 0.133 mL/kg human rabies immunoglobulin (HRIG) injected in and around the wound site(s) plus a course of rabies vaccination. Patients were followed for safety and absence of rabies for ≥ 365 days. ResultsGMT RVNA was higher with SYN023 throughout the 2-week post-treatment period. In the primary analysis group (n = 368), 99.4 % of SYN023 recipients versus 4.5 % of HRIG recipients had protective RVNA levels on Day 4. On Day 8, 98.1 % SYN023 versus 12.2 % HRIG recipients were protected. The SYN023:HRIG ratio of geometric mean titer of RVNA (RVNA GMTs) on Day 8 (19.42) exceeded the 10 % superiority margin (P < 0.0001) indicating higher Day 8 RVNA with SYN023. On Day 99, the SYN023:HRIG RVNA GMT ratio (0.66) was below the non-inferiority margin of 20 % (P = 0.9485) suggesting some moderation of vaccine immune response by SYN023 relative to HRIG. The ratio of percent SYN023:HRIG recipients achieving RVNA ≥ 0.5 IU/mL on Day 99 (0.98) met the non-inferiority margin of 20 % (P = 0.013) indicating anti-rabies immune response with SYN023 was non-inferior to HRIG despite this effect. There were no probable/confirmed rabies cases in any patient. Study regimens were well tolerated. ConclusionsSYN023 provided higher RVNA than HRIG soon after rabies exposure. By Day 99 post-treatment, GM RVNA with SYN023 was lower than HRIG, however, the percent of SYN023 recipients with a protective response was not inferior at this time point. No rabies cases were reported in the study. The SYN023 safety profile was acceptable.ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT03961555.

Experimental Validation a Method for Assessing Neutralizing Antibodies of Romiplostim in Human Plasma

Introduction. Romiplostim is an analogue of the fusion protein peptide of thrombopoietin (TPO), which increases platelet count by binding and activating the human thrombopoietin receptor (TPO-R). It is used to treat thrombocytopenia associated with chronic immune thrombocytopenia. For romiplostim, one of the possible adverse reactions from the immune system is immunogenicity: the production of anti-drug antibodies to the medicinal product, including neutralising antibodies, which may affect the efficacy and safety profile of the medicinal product.Aim. Validate the procedure for determining neutralising antibodies to romiplostim in human plasma for further clinical studies of immunogenicity.Materials and methods. The study used rabbit polyclonal antibodies to romiplostim, Nplate® produced by Amgen Europe as a standard sample; a placebo produced by LLC "GEROPHARM", a cell line 32D-hTPOR clone 63 with stable expression of human TPO receptor and a chemiluminescence assay kit CellTiter-Glo® Luminescent Cell Viability Assay produced by Promega to assess specificity. The experiment was carried out on cell line 32D-hTPOR clone 63, which was seeded on the first day and the neutralizing antibody concentrations were titrated with a constant concentration of romiplostim, then the chemiluminescence was detected on the second day. Statistical processing of the results was carried out using Prism 9 software.Result and discussion. The specificity of the procedure was demonstrated; at maximum concentration, the medicinal product differs from placebo by 309 times in the residual level of cell viability. The linearity of the procedure in terms of the coefficient determination is 0.9969. The precision of the procedure was determined: the repeatability was 1–9 %, the intermediate precision was 3–18 %. The coefficient of variation in selectivity of the procedure was 22 %. For the accuracy parameter, the values for recovery/spike were determined as 90–101 %. It was proven that there was no matrix effect.Conclusion. It can be stated that the procedure is linear, specific, highly precise, correct, selective and with a proven absence of matrix effect, which allows it to be used to determine the immunogenicity of romiplostim medicinal products in clinical studies.

Safety and Efficacy of Inactivated SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine in Patients with Rheumatic Diseases and Serum Antibody Changes Post-Omicron Variant Infection.

The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the inactivated severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccine has a similar effectiveness and safety profile in patients with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs) and healthy controls (HCs). Between August 10, 2021 and September 30, 2021, 134 HCs and 269 patients with RMDs were recruited. All participants who tested negative for COVID-19 were vaccinated with SARS-CoV-2 inactivated vaccine. Next, 150 patients with RMDs and 30 HCs infected with the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant within the previous 12weeks were recruited between February 20, 2023 and March 1, 2023. Serum samples were collected from each participant, and the serum immunoglobulin G (IgG) and immunoglobulin M (IgM) antibody titers against SARS-CoV-2 were determined using a chemiluminescence assay. No statistically significant difference was found in the titer of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG and IgM antibodies, or in the incidence of vaccination-related adverse events between the RMD and HC groups (P = 0.183, P = 0.903, and P = 0.27, respectively). Serum IgG titers of SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies were significantly higher in patients who received two or more doses of inactivated vaccine than in patients who were unvaccinated or had received one dose of vaccine (244.36 ± 109.79 vs. 66.20 ± 82.50; P < 0.001). SARS-CoV-2 inactivated vaccines have similar protective effects in HCs and patients with RMDs, with an appreciable safety profile. Fully vaccinated patients with RMDs infected with the Omicron variant were able to produce effective neutralizing antibody concentrations.

Immunogenicity and clinical effectiveness of mRNA vaccine booster against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron in patients with haematological malignancies: A national prospective cohort study.

Information regarding the protective anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels and the effectiveness of the mRNA vaccines against the Omicron variant in patients with haematological malignancies is limited. We prospectively followed two times BNT162b2 vaccinated oncohaematological patients (n = 1010) without prior COVID-19 for PCR-confirmed breakthrough infections during the Alpha/Delta and the Omicron phases of the pandemic. Anti-S1-IgG levels were longitudinally monitored in patients who had received the third (booster) vaccine dose. Patients with anti-S1-IgG levels <50 BAU/mL 1 month after the booster had a higher risk of Omicron infections (RR 1.91; 95% CI 1.39-2.63; p = 0.0001) and severe infections (RR 8.74; 95% CI 3.99-19.1; p < 0.0001). Conversely, the risk of severe COVID-19 was <1% with anti-S1-IgG levels >500 BAU/mL and neutralizing antibody concentrations >50 U/mL. The risks of breakthrough Omicron infections (HR 0.55; 95% CI 0.32-0.96; p = 0.034) and severe COVID-19 (HR 0.27; 95% 0.11-0.7; p = 0.0074) were lower among patients who had received the booster dose. In conclusion, low antibody levels are associated with significantly increased risk of both the breakthrough Omicron infections and severe COVID-19. The third mRNA vaccine dose improved the protection against the Omicron and reduced the risk of severe disease.

Immune Response Kinetics Following a Third Heterologous BNT162b2 Booster Dose After Primary 2-Dose ChAdOx1 Vaccination in Relation to Omicron Breakthrough Infection: A Prospective Nationwide Cohort Study in South Korea.

Immune responses to each vaccine must be investigated to establish effective vaccination strategies for the ongoing coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic. We investigated the long-term kinetics of immune responses after heterologous booster vaccination in relation to Omicron breakthrough infection (BI). Our study included 373 healthcare workers who received primary ChAdOx1 vaccine doses and a third BNT162b2 vaccine dose. BIs that occurred after the third vaccine were investigated. Blood specimens were collected before and 3 months after the booster dose from participants without BI and 1, 4, and 6 months after BI from participants who experienced BI. Spike-specific binding and neutralizing antibody levels against the wild-type virus, Omicron BA.1, and Omicron BA.5, as well as cellular responses, were analyzed. A total of 346 participants (82 in the no BI group; 192 in the BI group during the BA.1/BA.2 period; 72 in the BI group during the BA.5 period) were included in the analysis. Participants without BI exhibited the highest binding and neutralizing antibody concentrations and greatest cellular response 1 month after the third vaccination, which reached a nadir by the ninth month. Antibody and cellular responses in participants who experienced BI substantially increased postinfection. Neutralizing antibody titers in individuals who experienced BI during the BA.1/BA.2 period showed more robust increase against wild-type virus than against BA.1 and BA.5. Our findings provide evidence of antigenic imprinting in participants who received a heterologous booster vaccination, thereby serving as a foundation for further studies on the impact of BIs on immune responses.

Assay development considerations to improve drug tolerance in direct competitive ligand binding neutralizing antibody assays, pretreatment strategies

Neutralizing anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) may affect safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetic profile of a biotherapeutic drug and thus their assessment is of particular importance during immunogenicity testing. Neutralizing antibody (NAb) assays typically rely on NAbs ability to block the drug-target interaction. Higher NAb concentration and/or higher binding affinity of NAb to the drug, lowers the drug-target binding interaction. However, in the presence of high concentrations of residual circulating drug, as often seen for drugs with longer half-lives or in repeat-dose studies, NAbs may exist as drug bound complexes. In direct NAb assay formats, the NAb-drug complexes present in the sample could result in the NAb being unable to block the drug-target interaction eventually leading to a false negative response. The residual free circulating drug present in the sample may bind to the target in the NAb assay thereby competing with the drug used in the assay and inhibiting the assay signal, leading to a false positive response. For traditional ADA assays, multiple approaches involving acid treatment have been described to mitigate circulating drug interference issue. Here, we report two acid-treatment approaches that utilize the Dynabeads extraction with acid dissociation and Affinity Capture Elution (ACE) principle to improve drug tolerance in NAb assays.

Safety and immunogenicity of inactivated COVID-19 vaccine CoronaVac and the RBD-dimer-based COVID-19 vaccine ZF2001 in chronic hepatitis B patients.

Although COVID-19 vaccination is recommended for the patients with chronic liver disease, the clinical outcomes of COVID-19 vaccinated in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) has not been well characterized. The study aimed to explore the safety and specific antibody responses following COVID-19 vaccination among CHB patients. Patients with CHB were included. All patients were vaccinated with two doses of inactivated vaccine (CoronaVac) or three doses of adjuvanted protein subunit vaccine (ZF2001). The adverse events were recorded and neutralizing antibody (NAb) were determined 14 days following the whole-course vaccination. A total of 200 patients with CHB were included. Specific NAb against SARS-CoV-2 were positive in 170 (84.6%) patients. The median (IQR) concentrations of NAb were 16.32 (8.44-34.10) AU/ml. Comparison of immune responses between CoronaVac and ZF2001 vaccines showed no significant differences in neither the concentrations of NAb nor the seropositive rates (84.4 vs. 85.7%). Moreover, we observed lower immunogenicity in older patients and in patients with cirrhosis or underlying comorbidities. The incidences of adverse events were 37 (18.5%) with the most common adverse event as injection side pain [25 (12.5%)], followed by fatigue [15 (7.5%)]. There were no differences in the frequencies of adverse between CoronaVac and ZF2001 (19.3% vs. 17.6%). Almost all of the adverse reactions were mild and self-resolved within a few days after vaccination. Severe adverse events were not observed. COVID-19 vaccines, CoronaVac and ZF2001 had a favorable safety profile and induced efficient immune response in patients with CHB.

A sex-biased imbalance between Tfr, Tph, and atypical B cells determines antibody responses in COVID-19 patients

Sex-biased humoral immune responses to COVID-19 patients have been observed, but the cellular basis for this is not understood. Using single-cell proteomics by mass cytometry, we find disrupted regulation of humoral immunity in COVID-19 patients, with a sex-biased loss of circulating follicular regulatory T cells (cTfr) at a significantly greater rate in male patients. In addition, a male sex-associated cellular network of T-peripheral helper, plasma blasts, proliferating and extrafollicular/atypical CD11c+ memory B cells was strongly positively correlated with neutralizing antibody concentrations and negatively correlated with cTfr frequency. These results suggest that sex-specific differences to the balance of cTfr and a network of extrafollicular antibody production-associated cell types may be a key factor in the altered humoral immune responses between male and female COVID-19 patients.

Tissue-resident memory T cells trigger rapid exudation and local antibody accumulation

Adaptive immunity is didactically partitioned into humoral and cell-mediated effector mechanisms, which may imply that each arm is separate and does not function together. Here, we report that the activation of CD8+ resident memory T cells (TRM) in nonlymphoid tissues triggers vascular permeability, which facilitates rapid distribution of serum antibodies into local tissues. TRM reactivation was associated with transcriptional upregulation of antiviral signaling pathways as well as Fc receptors and components of the complement cascade. Effects were local, but evidence is presented that TRM in brain and reproductive mucosa are both competent to induce rapid antibody exudation. TRM reactivation in the mouse female genital tract increased local concentrations of virus-specific neutralizing antibodies, including anti-vesicular stomatitis virus, and passively transferred anti-HIV antibodies. We showed that this response was sufficient to increase the efficacy of ex vivo vesicular stomatitis virus neutralization. These results indicate that CD8+ TRM antigen recognition can enhance local humoral immunity.

Impedance-Based Neutralizing Antibody Detection Biosensor with Application in SARS-CoV-2 Infection.

Although safe and efficacious coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) vaccines are available, real protective immunity is revealed by the serum COVID-19 neutralizing antibody (NAb) concentration. NAbs deactivate the virus by attaching to the viral receptor-binding domain (RBD), which interacts with angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) on the human cell. This paper introduces inexpensive, rapid, sensitive, and quantifiable impedance-based immunosensors to evaluate the NAb. The sensor limit of detection is experimentally determined in different buffer dilutions using bovine IgG-anti-bovine IgG interaction. The dominance of AC electrokinetic transport and molecular diffusion in the sensor is investigated using scaling analysis and numerical simulations. The results demonstrated that the sensor detection mechanism is mainly based on the diffusion of the biomolecules onto the electrode surface. After evaluating the sensor working principles, viral RBD buffers, including different NAb concentrations, are applied to the sensor, immobilized with the human ACE2 (hACE2). Results demonstrate that the sensor is capable of NAb detection in the analytical measuring interval between 45 ng/mL and 185 ng/mL. Since the present sensor provides fast test results with lower costs, it can be used to assess the NAb in people's blood serum before receiving further COVID vaccine doses.

Efficacy and safety of inactivated novel coronavirus vaccine inoculation in patients with chronic hepatitis B

Objective: To explore the safety of inactivated novel coronavirus vaccine inoculation and the fluctuating neutralizing antibody in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB). Methods: Retrospective and prospective epidemiological research methods were employed. 153 CHB patients who visited the Department of Infectious Diseases at the First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University from September 2021 to February 2022 were selected as the research subjects. Information on vaccination-related adverse reactions was collected. Colloidal gold immunochromatography was used to identify neutralizing antibodies in the body after 3-6 months of vaccination. Statistical analysis was performed using the χ2-test or Fisher's exact test. Results: The positive rates of neutralizing antibodies after inactivated novel coronavirus vaccine inoculation in 153 patients with CHB were 45.50%, 44.70%, 40.00% and 16.20%, respectively, at 3, 4, 5, and 6 months. The neutralizing antibody concentrations were 10.00 (2.95, 30.01) U/ml, 6.08 (3.41, 24.50) U/ml, 5.90 (3.93, 14.68) U/ml, and 1.25 (0.92, 3.75) U/ml, respectively. The difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05) when the neutralizing antibody positivity rates in hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA-negative and positive patients and HBeAg-negative and positive patients at different time points were compared. The overall incidence of adverse reactions following vaccination was 18.30%. Pain at the site of inoculation and fatigue were the main presentations, and no serious adverse reactions occurred. Conclusion: CHB patients, when inoculated with an inactivated novel coronavirus vaccine, can produce neutralizing antibodies, which can stay at certain levels for 3, 4, and 5 months. However, the neutralizing antibody level gradually decreases over time, and the decrease is remarkable at 6 months. So, it is recommended to boost vaccinations at an appropriate time. Additionally, the results of the study suggest that HBV replication status has little effect on the production of neutralizing antibodies in CHB patients with relatively stable liver function, which means the inactivated novel coronavirus vaccine has a good safety profile.

Hemolysis-Inspired, Highly Sensitive, Label-Free IgM Detection Using Erythrocyte Membrane-Functionalized Nanomechanical Resonators

Immunoglobulin detection is important for immunoassays, such as diagnosing infectious diseases, evaluating immune status, and determining neutralizing antibody concentrations. However, since most immunoassays rely on labeling methods, there are limitations on determining the limit of detection (LOD) of biosensors. In addition, although the antigen must be immobilized via complex chemical treatment, it is difficult to precisely control the immobilization concentration. This reduces the reproducibility of the biosensor. In this study, we propose a label-free method for antibody detection using microcantilever-based nanomechanical resonators functionalized with erythrocyte membrane (EM). This label-free method focuses on the phenomenon of antibody binding to oligosaccharides (blood type antigen) on the surface of the erythrocyte. We established a method for extracting the EM from erythrocytes and fabricated an EM-functionalized microcantilever (MC), termed EMMC, by surface-coating EM layers on the MC. When the EMMC was treated with immunoglobulin M (IgM), the bioassay was successfully performed in the linear range from 2.2 pM to 22 nM, and the LOD was 2.0 pM. The EMMC also exhibited excellent selectivity compared to other biomolecules such as serum albumin, γ-globulin, and IgM with different paratopes. These results demonstrate that EMMC-based nanotechnology may be utilized in criminal investigations to identify blood types with minimal amounts of blood or to evaluate individual immunity through virus-neutralizing antibody detection.

Current immunoassays and detection of antibodies elicited by Omicron SARS-CoV-2 infection.

The present study aimed to determine whether current commercial immunoassays are adequate for detecting anti-Omicron antibodies. We analyzed the anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody response of 23 unvaccinated individuals 1-2 months after an Omicron infection. All blood samples were tested with a live virus neutralization assay using a clinical Omicron BA.1 strain and four commercial SARS-CoV-2 immunoassays. We assessed three anti-Spike immunoassays (SARS-CoV-2 IgG II Quant [Abbott S], Wantaï anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody ELISA [Wantaï], Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 S assay [Roche]) and one anti-Nucleocapsid immunoassay (Abbott SARS-CoV-2 IgG assay [Abbott N]). Omicron neutralizing antibodies were detected in all samples with the live virus neutralization assay. The detection rate of the Abbott S, Wantai, Roche, and Abbott N immunoassays were 65.2%, 69.6%, 86.9%, and 91.3%, respectively. The sensitivities of Abbott S and Wantai immunoassays were significantly lower than that of the live virus neutralization assay (p = 0.004, p = 0.009; Fisher's exact test). Antibody concentrations obtained with anti-S immunoassays were correlated with Omicron neutralizing antibody concentrations. These data provide clinical evidence of the loss of performance of some commercial immunoassays to detect antibodies elicited by Omicron infections. It highlights the need to optimize these assays by adapting antigens to the circulating SARS-CoV-2 strains.

Antibody response to COVID-19 vaccines among workers with a wide range of exposure to per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are a broad class of synthetic chemicals; some are present in most humans in developed countries. Several studies have shown associations between certain PFAS, such as perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS), and reduced antibody concentration after vaccination against diseases such as Tetanus. Recent studies have reported associations between COVID-19 occurrence and exposure to certain types of PFAS. However, studies of antibody concentration after COVID-19 vaccination in relation to PFAS serum concentrations have not been reported. We examined COVID-19 antibody responses to vaccines and PFAS serum concentrations among employees and retirees from two 3M facilities, one of which historically manufactured PFOS, PFOA, and perfluorohexane sulfonic acid (PFHxS).Participants completed enrollment and follow-up study visits in the Spring of 2021, when vaccines were widely available. In total 415 participants with 757 observations were included in repeated measures analyses. Log-transformed concentrations of anti-spike IgG and neutralizing antibodies were modeled in relation to concentration of PFAS at enrollment after adjusting for antigenic stimulus group (9 groups determined by COVID-19 history and number and type of vaccination) and other variables. The fully adjusted IgG concentration was 3.45 percent lower (95% CI −7.03, 0.26) per 14.5 ng/mL (interquartile range) increase in PFOS; results for neutralizing antibody and PFOS were similar. For PFOA, PFHxS, and perfluorononanoic acid (PFNA), the results were comparable to those for PFOS, though of smaller magnitude. In our study data, the fully adjusted coefficients relating concentration of vaccine-induced antibodies to COVID-19 and interquartile range difference in serum concentration of PFOS, PFOA, PFHxS, and PFNA were inverse but small with confidence intervals that included zero. Our analysis showed that the coefficient for the four PFAS examined in detail was considerably affected by adjustment for antigenic stimulus group.

Clinical Trial Subgroup Analyses to Investigate Clinical and Immunological Outcomes of Convalescent Plasma Therapy in Severe COVID-19.

ObjectiveTo assess clinical and immunological benefits of passive immunization using convalescent plasma therapy (CPT) we performed sub-group analyses on a completed randomised control trial (RCT) on CPT in severe COVID-19.PatientsA series of subclass analyses were performed on the previously published outcome data and accompanying clinical metadata from a completed RCT (Clinical Trial Registry of India, No. CTRI/2020/05/025209).MethodsThe subclass analyses were performed on the outcome data and accompanying clinical metadata from a completed randomized control trial. Data on the plasma abundance of a large panel of cytokines from the same cohort of patients were also utilised to characterize the heterogeneity of the putative anti-inflammatory function of convalescent plasma (CP) in addition to passively providing neutralizing antibodies.ResultsWhile across all age-groups primary clinical outcomes were not significantly different in the RCT, significant immediate mitigation of hypoxia, reduction in hospital stay as well as significant survival benefit were registered in younger (<67 years in our cohort) severe COVID-19 patients with ARDS on receiving CPT. In addition to neutralizing antibody content of convalescent plasma, its anti-inflammatory proteome on attenuation of systemic cytokine deluge, significantly contributed to the clinical benefits of CPT.ConclusionThe sub-group analyses revealed that clinical benefit of CPT in severe COVID-19 is linked to the anti-inflammatory protein content of CP, apart from the anti-SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibody content.

Immunologic and Protective Properties of Subunit- vs. Whole Toxoid-Derived Anti-Botulinum Equine Antitoxin.

Botulism is a paralytic disease caused by botulinum neurotoxins (BoNTs). Equine antitoxin is currently the standard therapy for botulism in human. The preparation of equine antitoxin relies on the immunization of horses with botulinum toxoid, which suffers from low yield and safety limitations. The Hc fragment of BoNTs was suggested to be a potent antibotulinum subunit vaccine. The current study presents a comparative evaluation of equine-based toxoid-derived antitoxin (TDA) and subunit-derived antitoxin (SDA). The potency of recombinant Hc/A, Hc/B, and Hc/E in mice was similar to that of toxoids of the corresponding serotypes. A single boost with Hc/E administered to a toxoid E-hyperimmune horse increased the neutralizing antibody concentration (NAC) from 250 to 850 IU/mL. Immunization of naïve horses with the recombinant subunits induced a NAC comparable to that of horses immunized with the toxoid. SDA and TDA bound common epitopes on BoNTs, as demonstrated by an in vitro competition binding assay. In vivo, SDA and TDA showed similar efficacy when administered to guinea pigs postexposure to a lethal dose of botulinum toxins. Collectively, the results of the current study suggest that recombinant BoNT subunits may replace botulinum toxoids as efficient and safe antigens for the preparation of pharmaceutical anti-botulinum equine antitoxins.

SARS-CoV-2 Convalescent Sera Binding and Neutralizing Antibody Concentrations Compared with COVID-19 Vaccine Efficacy Estimates against Symptomatic Infection.

Previous COVID-19 vaccine efficacy (VE) studies have estimated neutralizing and binding antibody concentrations that correlate with protection from symptomatic infection; how these estimates compare to those generated in response to SARS-CoV-2 infection is unclear. Here, we assessed quantitative neutralizing and binding antibody concentrations using standardized SARS-CoV-2 assays on 3,067 serum specimens collected during 27 July 2020 to 27 August 2020 from COVID-19-unvaccinated persons with detectable anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. Neutralizing and binding antibody concentrations were severalfold lower in the unvaccinated study population compared to published concentrations at 28 days postvaccination. In this convenience sample, ~88% of neutralizing and ~63 to 86% of binding antibody concentrations met or exceeded concentrations associated with 70% COVID-19 VE against symptomatic infection; ~30% of neutralizing and 1 to 14% of binding antibody concentrations met or exceeded concentrations associated with 90% COVID-19 VE. Our study not only supports observations of infection-induced immunity and current recommendations for vaccination postinfection to maximize protection against COVID-19, but also provides a large data set of pre-COVID-19 vaccination anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody concentrations that will serve as an important comparator in the current setting of vaccine-induced and hybrid immunity. As new SARS-CoV-2 variants emerge and displace circulating virus strains, we recommend that standardized binding antibody assays that include spike protein-based antigens be utilized to estimate antibody concentrations correlated with protection from COVID-19. These estimates will be helpful in informing public health guidance, such as the need for additional COVID-19 vaccine booster doses to prevent symptomatic infection. IMPORTANCE Although COVID-19 vaccine efficacy (VE) studies have estimated antibody concentrations that correlate with protection from COVID-19, how these estimates compare to those generated in response to SARS-CoV-2 infection is unclear. We assessed quantitative neutralizing and binding antibody concentrations using standardized assays on serum specimens collected from COVID-19-unvaccinated persons with detectable antibodies. We found that most unvaccinated persons with qualitative antibody evidence of prior infection had quantitative antibody concentrations that met or exceeded concentrations associated with 70% VE against COVID-19. However, only a small proportion had antibody concentrations that met or exceeded concentrations associated with 90% VE, suggesting that persons with prior COVID-19 would benefit from vaccination to maximize protective antibody concentrations against COVID-19.

Immunogenicity of BNT162b2 Vaccine Booster Dose in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease Receiving Infliximab Combination Therapy: A Prospective Observational Study.

IntroductionFew data exist regarding the immunogenicity of the third dose of BNT162b2 relative to the second dose in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) on different immunosuppressive therapies. We investigated the immunogenicity of BNT162b2 vaccine booster dose in patients with IBD on infliximab combination therapy.MethodThis is a prospective single-center observational study conducted from January 1, 2022 to February 28, 2022. Patients were recruited at the time of attendance at the infusion center. Eligibility criteria included patients with a confirmed diagnosis of IBD who are receiving infliximab with azathioprine or 6-mercaptopurine. Patients who received two doses of BNT162b2 vaccine (second dose group) were compared to patients who had received three doses of BNT162b2 vaccine [third dose (booster) group]. Patients were excluded if they were infected or had symptoms of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) previously since the start of the pandemic or received other vaccines than the BNT162b2. Our primary outcome was the concentrations of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies Immunoglobulin G (IgG) and neutralizing antibodies 40–45 weeks from the first dose of BNT162b2 vaccine in patients with IBD receiving infliximab combination therapy. Medians with interquartile range (IQR) were calculated.ResultsIn total, 162 patients with IBD and receiving infliximab combination therapy were recruited, and the number of patients in both the second dose group and third dose (booster) group was 81. Mean age was 35 years old in both groups. Median (IQR) SARS-CoV-2 IgG levels were significantly lower after the second dose [125 BAU/ml (43, 192)] compared to patients who received the third booster dose [207 BAU/ml (181, 234)] (P = 0.003). Neutralizing antibody levels were also lower after the second dose [80% (21, 95)] compared to patients who received the third booster dose [96% (93, 99)] (P ≤ 0.001). The percentage of patients who achieved positive SARS-CoV-2 IgG levels in the third (booster) dose group was 96.3%, whereas it was 86.4% in the second dose group. The percentage of participants who received the third (booster) dose and achieved a positive SARS-CoV-2-neutralizing antibody level was 100%, whereas it was 88.9% in the participants who received the second dose only.ConclusionMost patients with IBD on infliximab combination therapy had positive SARS-CoV-2 IgG and neutralizing antibody concentrations 40–45 weeks post BNT162b2 vaccination. However, SARS-CoV-2 IgG and neutralizing antibody concentrations were lower in patients who received two doses only compared to patients who received a third dose. A longer follow-up study is needed to evaluate decay in antibodies over time.

Humoral and Cellular Immune Response After a 3-Dose Heterologous SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination Using the mRNA-BNT162b2 and Viral Vector Ad26COVS1 Vaccine in Hemodialysis Patients.

BackgroundDue to the waning humoral response after a two-dose SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination, a third booster was recommended in hemodialyis patients. Data on a heterologous mRNA-vector regimen, which might improve immunogenicity, are very limited.MethodsIn this observational study 36 chronic hemodialysis patients (mean (SD) age 66.9 (15.9) years, 33.3% females) were followed up for 13 months. All patients were vaccinated twice using the mRNA-BNT162b2 vaccine, followed by a 3rd dose of the vector vaccine Ad26COVS1 eight months later. We assessed the humoral response by quantifying the anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike IgG antibody and neutralizing antibody concentrations. The cellular immune response was evaluated via SARS-CoV-2 spike protein-specific interferon-γ release assay.ResultsThe seroconversion rate was 47.2%, 100%, 69.4% and 100% one month after the 1st dose, one and six months after the 2nd dose and four months after the heterologous 3rd dose. The median (Q1, Q3) anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike IgG concentrations at the same time were 28.7 (13.2, 69.4) BAU/ml, 1130.0 (594.5, 1735.0) BAU/ml, 89.7 (26.4, 203.8) BAU/ml, and 2080.0 (1062.5, 2080.0) BAU/ml. The percentage of patients with neutralizing antibodies was 58.3% after the 2nd dose and improved to 100% after the 3rd dose (P <0.001). A positive T-cell response was found in 50% of patients after the 3rd dose.ConclusionsA third heterologous booster dose helped to sustain humoral immunity in almost all hemodialysis patients and induced a significant T-cellular response in half of them. Stimulating the immune response against SARS-CoV-2 by two different vaccine platforms seems to be a promising approach.

Anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and neutralizing antibodies at 1 and 3 months after three doses of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in a large cohort of solid organ transplant patients

The immunogenicity of the severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccine was improved by the administration of a third dose. The aim of our retrospective study was to assess the evolution of binding and neutralizing antibody concentration until 3months after the third dose in a large cohort of solid organ transplant (SOT) patients (n=872). At 1month after the third dose, anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies were detected by means of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay tests in 578 patients (66.3%). In a subgroup of patients, 70% (180 out of 257) had anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody concentrations ranging from 1.2 to 18411 binding antibody units (BAU)/ml and 48.5% (115 out of 239) had a neutralizing antibodies titer that can confer clinical protection against SARS-CoV-2. Three-hundred ninety-three patients out of the 416 (94.5%) who were seropositive at month 1 and were tested at 3months after vaccination remained seropositive. Between months 1 and 3 after vaccination, binding and neutralizing antibodies concentrations decreased significantly. The proportion of protected patients against the SARS-CoV-2 also slightly decreased. In conclusion, this study shows that although two-third of SOT develop anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies after three doses, one-third of them remain weak or non-protected. It is important to measure anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies to define the strategy that can optimize SOT protection against SARS-CoV-2.