Dexmedetomidine Concentration Research Articles

Possible Involvement of Protein Binding Inhibition in Changes in Dexmedetomidine Concentration in Extracorporeal Circuits during Midazolam Use.

It was recently reported that the dexmedetomidine concentration within the extracorporeal circuit decreases with co-administration of midazolam. In this study, we investigated whether displacement of dexmedetomidine by midazolam from the binding site of major plasma proteins, human serum albumin (HSA) and α1-acid glycoprotein (AAG), would increase levels of free dexmedetomidine that could be adsorbed to the circuit. Equilibrium dialysis experiments indicated that dexmedetomidine binds to a single site on both HSA and AAG with four times greater affinity than midazolam. Midazolam-mediated inhibition of the binding of dexmedetomidine to HSA and AAG was also examined. The binding of dexmedetomidine to these proteins decreased in the presence of midazolam. Competitive binding experiments suggested that the inhibition of binding by midazolam was due to competitive displacement at site II of HSA and due to non-competitive displacement at the site of AAG. Thus, our present data indicate that free dexmedetomidine displaced by midazolam from site II of HSA or from AAG is adsorbed onto extracorporeal circuits, resulting in a change in the dexmedetomidine concentration within the circuit.

The motor effects of 0.25% bupivacaine vs 0.19 bupivacaine in ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus block in pediatrics undergoing below-elbow orthopedic surgeries: A randomized controlled study

ABSTRACT Background The standard dose of bupivacaine used in axillary brachial plexus block (ABPB) in pediatrics is 0.5 ml/kg of bupivacaine 0.25%. However, bupivacaine (0.19%) is still to be investigated for peripheral nerve block in pediatrics regarding the efficacy and adequacy of intra- and postoperative analgesia and degree of motor affection. We aimed to compare different concentrations (0.25%, 0.19%) of bupivacaine plus dexmedetomidine mixture to perform US-ABPB in pediatrics undergoing upper limb surgery distal to the elbow regarding affecting the postoperative motor power and adequacy of intra- and postoperative analgesia. Methods This prospective, randomised-controlled, double-blinded work was performed on 60 pediatric individuals presenting for upper limb orthopedic surgeries in the wrist, hand, and elbow distal to cubital fossa with surgical time planned to not exceed 1 h. 0.25% bupivacaine plus 1 µg/kg dexmedetomidine (Group A) or 0.19% bupivacaine in addition to 1 µg/kg dexmedetomidine (Group B) were given at random to participants. Motor power and pain were assessed using the Modified Bromage scale, Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, and Consolability (FLACC) score, respectively. Results A highly substantial variation was recorded between the two groups in Bromage 0 till Bromage 60 with higher values in group (B), and no substantial variation was found in Bromage 90 till Bromage 180 existed between the two groups. No substantial variation existed among the two groups with regard to FLACC score in FLACC0 (immediately after recovery), 1st hour after recovery, and 12th hour after recovery, and FLACC was significantly more (p < 0.05) in group B contrasted to group A in the 4th hour after recovery and 8th hour after recovery. Conclusion Using a lower concentration of bupivacaine (0.19%) plus dexmedetomidine (1 µg/kg) was associated with regain of postoperative motor power with the same postoperative analgesic efficacy compared to the standard concentration (0.25%) bupivacaine plus dexmedetomidine (1 µg/kg) in the early postoperative period in US-ABPB.

EEG response of dexmedetomidine during drug induced sleep endoscopy.

Dexmedetomidine is one of the anesthetics of choice for drug induced sleep endoscopy (DISE), with advantages including limited respiratory depression, analgesia, and decreased incidence of emergence delirium. However, challenges with determining sedation levels and prolonged recovery have limited its usage. An improved understanding of the effect of dexmedetomidine on the level of sedation and the corresponding electroencephalographic (EEG) changes could help overcome these barriers. Fifty-one patients received dexmedetomidine sedation with Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) score assessment and continuous EEG monitoring via SedLine for DISE. We constructed a pharmacokinetic model to determine continuous dexmedetomidine blood concentration. From the SedLine, we extracted the patient state index (PSI), and from the EEG we calculated the spectral edge frequency 95% (SEF95) and the correlation dimension (CD), a type of fractal dimension used to assess the complexity of a system. These metrics were subsequently compared against one another and with the dexmedetomidine concentration. Our pharmacokinetic model yielded a two-compartment model with volumes of 51.8 L and 106.2 L, with clearances of 69.5 and 168.9 L/h, respectively, and a time to effect of 9 min, similar to prior studies. Based on this model, decreasing RASS score, SEF95, CD, and PSI were all significantly associated with increasing dexmedetomidine concentration (p < 0.001, p = 0.006, p < 0.001 respectively). The CD, SEF95, and PSI better captured the effects of increasing dexmedetomidine concentration as compared to the RASS score. Simulating dexmedetomidine concentration based on titration to target levels derived from CD and PSI confirmed commonly used dexmedetomidine infusion dosages. Dexmedetomidine use for DISE confirmed previous pharmacokinetic models seen with dexmedetomidine. Complex EEG metrics such as PSI and CD, as compared to RASS score and SEF95, better captured changes in brain state from dexmedetomidine and have potential to improve the monitoring of dexmedetomidine sedation.

Pharmacokinetics of dexmedetomidine in pediatric patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass.

Cardiopulmonary bypass can affect the pharmacokinetics of anesthetic agents. We aimed to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of dexmedetomidine for infants and small children undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass based on population pharmacokinetics. We enrolled 30 pediatric cardiac surgical patients in this study. After anesthetic induction with atropine (0.02 mg/kg), thiopental sodium (5mg/kg), and fentanyl (2-3μg/kg), we administered 1μg/kg of dexmedetomidine for 10min, followed by administration of 0.5μg/kg of dexmedetomidine per hour during surgery. At the initiation of cardiopulmonary bypass, 1μg/kg of dexmedetomidine was infused over 5min. Arterial blood was obtained at predefined time points. A pharmacokinetic model was developed using NONMEM. Theory-based allometric scaling with fixed exponents was applied. Weight, age, post-menstrual age, fat-free mass, whether to implement cardiopulmonary bypass and temperature were explored as covariates. A total of 376 blood samples were obtained from 29 children (age: 20.3 ± 19.3months, weight: 9.7 ± 4.1kg). A two-compartment mammillary model with third compartment associated cardiopulmonary bypass procedure best explained the pharmacokinetics of dexmedetomidine. The pharmacokinetic parameter estimates (95% CI) standardized to a 70-kg person were as follows: V1 (L)=31.6 (17.9-39.5), V2 (L)=90.1 (44.0-330), Cl (L/min)=1.08 (0.70-1.25), Q (L/min)=2.0 (1.05-3.46). Volume for third compartment associated cardiopulmonary bypass procedure (L)=39.4 (19.3-50.9). Clearance was not influenced by the presence of cardiopulmonary bypass in this model. When cardiopulmonary bypass is applied, the plasma concentration of dexmedetomidine decreases due to an increase in the volume of distribution, so a loading dose is required to maintain the previous concentration.

Justification Of Empiric Methodology to Determine Dexmedetomidine Dose for the TREX Study.

Dexmedetomidine is the sedative agent administered in combination with remifentanil and low dose of sevoflurane in the interventional arm of the ongoing TREX trial (Trial Remifentanil DExmedetomidine). The TREX pilot study (published in Paediatr Anaesth 2019;29:59-67) established infusion rates higher than those initially proposed. This could be attributed to an inappropriate target concentration for sedation or incorrect initial pharmacokinetic parameter estimates. The TREX study is a Phase III, randomized, active controlled, parallel group, blinded evaluator, multicentre, superiority trial comparing neurological outcome after standard sevoflurane anaesthesia with dexmedetomidine/remifentanil and low dose sevoflurane anaesthesia in children aged less than 2 years undergoing anaesthesia of 2 hours or longer. In this report, dexmedetomidine pharmacokinetics were analysed in the interventional arm of the Italian population. There were 162 blood samples from 32 infants (22 male and 10 female). The median (IQR) age was 12 (5.2-15.5) months, weight 9.9 (7.3-10.8) kg. Duration of anaesthesia ranged from 2-6 hours. None of the children were born premature (median postnatal age 39 weeks, IQR 38-40 weeks). A 3-compartment PK model that incorporated allometric scaling and a maturation function demonstrated plasma concentration observations from the current Italian arm of the TREX study were consistent with those predicted by a "universal" model using pooled data obtained from neonates to adults. This current PK analysis from the Italian arm of the TREX study confirms that plasma concentration of dexmedetomidine is predictable using known covariates such as age and size. The initial target concentration (0.6 μg.L-1 ) used to sedate children cared for in the intensive care after cardiac surgery was inadequate for infants in the current TREX study. A target concentration 1 mcg.L-1 , corresponding to a loading dose of 1 mcg.kg-1 followed by an infusion of 1 mcg.kg-1 .hour-1 , provided adequate sedation.

Dose Escalation Pharmacokinetic Study of Intranasal Atomized Dexmedetomidine in Pediatric Patients With Congenital Heart Disease.

Atomized intranasal dexmedetomidine is an attractive option when sedation is required for pediatric patients as either premedication or the sole agent for noninvasive, nonpainful procedures. While intranasal dexmedetomidine is used frequently in this population, it is still unclear what dose and time of administration relative to the procedure will result in the optimal effect. Knowledge regarding the maximum concentration (C max ) and time to reach maximum concentration (T max ) of intranasally administered dexmedetomidine is the first step toward this. The risk of hemodynamic instability caused by increasing doses of dexmedetomidine necessitates a greater understanding of the pharmacokinetics in children. Sixteen pediatric patients 2 to 6 years of age undergoing elective cardiac catheterization received 2 or 4 μg/kg dexmedetomidine intranasally. Plasma concentrations were determined by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry with a validated assay. Descriptive noncompartmental analysis provided estimates of peak concentrations and time to reach peak concentrations. A population pharmacokinetic model was developed using nonlinear mixed-effects modeling. Simulations were performed using the final model to assess dose concentrations with an alternative dosing regimen of 3 µg/kg. A median peak plasma concentration of 413 pg/mL was achieved 91 minutes after 2 μg/kg dosing, and a median peak plasma concentration of 1000 pg/mL was achieved 54 minutes after 4 μg/kg dosing. A 1-compartment pharmacokinetic model adequately described the data. Three subjects in the 4 μg/kg dosing cohort achieved a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), defined as a plasma dexmedetomidine concentration >1000 pg/mL. None of these subjects had any significant hemodynamic consequences. Simulations showed that no subjects would experience a level >1000 pg/mL when using a dose of 3 µg/kg. Concentrations associated with adequate sedation can be achieved with intranasal dexmedetomidine doses of 2 to 4 µg/kg in children 2 to 6 years of age. However, 50% of our evaluable subjects in this cohort reached a plasma concentration >1000 pg/mL. Doses of 3 µg/kg may be optimal in this population, with simulated concentrations remaining below this previously established toxicity threshold. Further studies correlating concentrations with efficacy and adverse effects are needed.

Perioperative Low Dose Dexmedetomidine and Its Effect on the Visibility of the Surgical Field for Middle Ear Microsurgery: A Randomised Controlled Trial.

Background and Purpose: There are many benefits of administering dexmedetomidine perioperatively. The pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of intravenous, intranasal and oral dexmedetomidine that was administered before anesthesia were compared in this study, and the effects of dexmedetomidine on the surgical field visibility in tympanoplasty was evaluated. Methods: A single-blind, randomized controlled trial was conducted in a university-affiliated hospital where 45 patients who underwent tympanoplasty under general anesthesia were randomly allocated into three groups. Dexmedetomidine was administered by intravenous infusion at 0.8 μg.kg−1 for 10 min, intranasal instillation at a drop rate of 1 μg.kg−1 and oral intake at 4 μg.kg−1 ten minutes before the induction of anesthesia. The PK and PD of dexmedetomidine after a single low dose administration and its effect on the surgical field in tympanoplasty were analysed. Results: A plasma concentration of dexmedetomidine of 220 pg/ml was achieved immediately after intravenous infusion and at 13.2 and 70.3 min for intranasal and oral administration, respectively. Dexmedetomidine decreased the heart rate (HR) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) in all three groups, although these values remained higher in the oral dexmedetomidine group at all eight time points. Intravenous dexmedetomidine provided the best visualization of the surgical field for opening of the tympanic sinus, 30 min after the start of the infusion (p < 0.05). Intranasal dexmedetomidine provided a significantly better visual field than oral dexmedetomidine for the repair of a tympanic membrane perforation using the fascia temporal muscle (p < 0.05). Conclusion: A single low dose of dexmedetomidine administered intravenously or intranasally could decrease HR and MAP, improve surgical field visibility and be appropriate for deliberate hypotension for surgical procedures of 1–2 h in length. Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT03800641.

Dexmedetomidine promotes apoptosis and suppresses proliferation of hepatocellular carcinoma cells via microRNA-130a/EGR1 axis

Accumulating evidence has revealed the role of microRNAs (miRs) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Dexmedetomidine, a highly selective α2-adrenergic agonist, is widely used in perioperative settings for analgesia and sedation. Herein, we aimed to determine whether dexmedetomidine might directly regulate miR-130a/early growth response 1 (EGR1) axis in HCC and explore the related mechanisms. miR-130a and EGR1 expression were determined in HCC tissues and their correlation was evaluated. Human HCC cell line HCCLM3 was selected. Upon the determination of the optimal concentration of dexmedetomidine, HCCLM3 cells were treated with dexmedetomidine, miR-130a- or EGR1-related oligonucleotides or plasmids were transfected into cells to explore their functions in cell biological behaviors. miR-130a and EGR1 levels in cells were tested. The targeting relationship between miR-130a and EGR1 was verified. miR-130a was inhibited while EGR1 was elevated in HCC tissues and they were negatively correlated. EGR1 was targeted by miR-130a. With the increase of dexmedetomidine concentration, HCCLM3 cell viability was correspondingly inhibited, miR-130a expression was elevated and EGR1 expression was decreased. Dexmedetomidine, upregulating miR-130a or downregulating EGR1 inhibited proliferation, invasion and migration, and promoted apoptosis of HCCLM3 cells. MiR-130a upregulation/downregulation enhanced/impaired the effect of dexmedetomidine on cell biological behaviors. Our study provides evidence that raising miR-130a enhances the inhibitory effects of dexmedetomidine on HCC cellular growth via inhibiting EGR1. Thus, miR-130a may be a potential candidate for the treatment of HCC.

Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Dexmedetomidine Administered as an Adjunct to Bupivacaine for Transversus Abdominis Plane Block in Patients Undergoing Lower Abdominal Cancer Surgery.

BackgroundDespite the growing interest in dexmedetomidine as an adjunct to truncal blocks, little is known about the systemic absorption of dexmedetomidine after these blocks and its role in analgesia and in hemodynamics.ObjectiveWe investigated the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of dexmedetomidine as an adjunct to transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block in patients undergoing lower abdominal cancer surgery.MethodsTwenty-four adult patients were randomized to receive a bilateral single-injection TAP block before surgery with 20 mL of bupivacaine 0.5% (TAP group, n = 12) or combined with 1 µg/kg dexmedetomidine (TAP-DEX group, n = 12) and diluted with saline to a volume of 40 mL (20 mL on each side). Plasma concentrations of dexmedetomidine and its pharmacokinetics were investigated using non-compartmental methods, postoperative analgesia, hemodynamics, and adverse events (nausea, vomiting, itching, hypotension, bradycardia, and respiratory depression).ResultsDexmedetomidine was detected in the plasma of 11 patients in the TAP-DEX group. The mean dexmedetomidine peak plasma concentration (Cmax) was 0.158 ± 0.085 (range, 0.045–0.31) ng/mL. The median time to reach peak plasma concentration of dexmedetomidine (Tmax) was 15 (15–45) min. From 2 to 8 h postoperatively, visual analog pain scale (VAS) scores at rest and during movement were significantly lower in the TAP-DEX group. Analgesia time was (11.3 ± 3.12 vs 9.0 ± 4.69 h; P = 0.213) and postoperative morphine consumption was (7.4 ± 3.24 vs 11.5 ± 4.46 mg; P = 0.033) in TAP-DEX and TAP groups, respectively. Lower mean heart rate and mean blood pressure were recorded in the TAP-DEX group intraoperatively and 2 h postoperatively (P < 0.05). Except for mild nausea and vomiting, no adverse events were recorded in either group.ConclusionSystemic absorption of dexmedetomidine administered in a TAP block is common. Direct central effects on the locus coeruleus caused by this systemic absorption may play a role in the analgesia and hemodynamic effects produced by TAP-dexmedetomidine in addition to local mechanisms.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrial.gov (identifier: NCT03328299).

Effects of dopamine, norepinephrine or phenylephrine on the prevention of hypotension in isoflurane-anesthetized cats administered vatinoxan or vatinoxan and dexmedetomidine

ObjectiveTo determine the dose of phenylephrine, norepinephrine and dopamine necessary to maintain mean arterial pressure (MAP) within 70–80 mmHg during administration of isoflurane, isoflurane and vatinoxan and isoflurane, vatinoxan and dexmedetomidine at three plasma concentrations. Study designRandomized crossover experimental study. AnimalsA group of five adult healthy neutered male cats. MethodsInstrumentation occurred during anesthesia with isoflurane in oxygen. Isoflurane end-tidal concentration was set to 1.25 × minimum alveolar concentration (MAC). Phenylephrine, norepinephrine or dopamine was administered to maintain MAP 70–80 mmHg. A target-controlled infusion system was used to administer vatinoxan at a target plasma concentration of 1 μg mL–1 and three dexmedetomidine concentrations (5, 10 and 20 ng mL–1). Isoflurane concentration was altered to maintain an equivalent 1.25 MAC. Heart rate, arterial blood pressure, central venous pressure, pulmonary artery pressure, pulmonary artery occlusion pressure, body temperature, arterial and mixed venous blood gas, cardiac output and drug concentrations were measured at baseline (isoflurane alone), during vatinoxan administration, and during administration of vatinoxan and dexmedetomidine at the three target concentrations. ResultsMAP < 70 mmHg was observed with vatinoxan alone and in the dopamine treatment with dexmedetomidine concentrations ≤ 10 ng mL–1. Norepinephrine and phenylephrine maintained MAP 70–80 mmHg during vatinoxan and dexmedetomidine ≤ 10 ng mL–1. As the target dexmedetomidine concentration increased, the dose of norepinephrine and phenylephrine needed to maintain MAP 70–80 mmHg decreased; no treatment was necessary to maintain MAP > 70 mmHg at the 20 ng mL–1 target dexmedetomidine concentration in most cats. Conclusions and clinical relevanceNorepinephrine and phenylephrine, but not dopamine, are effective to prevent hypotension in isoflurane-anesthetized cats administered dexmedetomidine and vatinoxan.

Cardiopulmonary function and intestinal blood flow in anaesthetised, experimentally endotoxaemic horses given a constant rate infusion of dexmedetomidine.

Endotoxaemia causes untoward inflammatory-mediated effects that might be attenuated by dexmedetomidine. To evaluate the effects of a dexmedetomidine intravenous (IV) infusion on systemic and intestinal haemodynamics and arterial blood gas values in sevoflurane-anaesthetised horses administered Escherichia coli O55:B5 lipopolysaccharides (LPS). Randomised controlled in vivo experiment. A total of 13 horses weighing 456±86kg (mean±standard deviation) and aged 13.9±9.0years donated for euthanasia underwent ventral midline celiotomy using sevoflurane anaesthesia. Baseline physiological variables were recorded after a 90-minute equilibration period. All horses were given 0.1mcg/kgbwt LPS IV. Horses were randomly assigned to no further treatment (group LPS; seven horses) or IV administration of dexmedetomidine (loading dose 1.75mcg/kgbwt followed by 1.75mcg/kgbwt/h; group LPS-Dex; six horses) with concurrent target sevoflurane dose reduction of 50%. Cardiac index (CI; thermodilution), intestinal blood flow, arterial blood parameters and plasma dexmedetomidine concentration measurements were recorded every 30minutes until euthanasia at 390minutes. Data were compared between and within groups to baseline using a mixed model analysis (significance P<.05). In LPS-Dex horses, intestinal blood flow and CI were transiently decreased after the dexmedetomidine loading dose, but no significant differences were found compared with baseline during the infusion. Sevoflurane dose was reliably reduced by approximately 40%. Significant differences were identified in creatinine (115 umol/L LPS-Dex; 195umol/L LPS), bicarbonate (29.7mmol/L LPS-Dex; 23mmol/L LPS) and base excess (2.0mmol/L LPS-Dex; -5.3mmol/L LPS). Dexmedetomidine plasma concentrations were highest after the loading dose and stable during infusion dosing. Experimental conditions are not reflective of clinical colic management. A dexmedetomidine infusion with sevoflurane dose reduction attenuated some deleterious changes in anaesthetised horses administered LPS without sustained negative cardiovascular effects and may be beneficial during colic surgery.

Sequestration of Dexmedetomidine in Ex Vivo Cardiopulmonary Bypass Circuits.

Dexmedetomidine (DEX) is a sedative used in combination with other drugs in neonates and infants undergoing cardiac surgery using cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). This study aimed to evaluate the disposition of DEX after administration to the ex vivo CPB circuits following different bolus doses and continuous infusion of DEX, including the effect of circuit coating, temperature, and modified ultrafiltration (MUF). Cardiopulmonary bypass circuits were setup ex vivo and primed with reconstituted blood. Dexmedetomidine was administered to the circuit (as a single bolus or single bolus along with continuous infusion). The circuit was allowed to equilibrate during the first 5 minutes, blood samples were collected at multiple time points (5-240 minutes). Blood samples were processed to collect plasma and analyzed for DEX with a validated assay. The majority of DEX sequestration in ex vivo CPB circuits occurred within the first 15 minutes. The percent of DEX remained in plasma pre-MUF (16-71%) and post-MUF (22-92%) varied depending on the dose and dosing scheme. Modified ultrafiltration significantly increased the plasma concentration of DEX in 19 of 23 circuits by an average of 12.1 ± 4.25% (p < 0.05). The percent sequestration of DEX was lower in CPB circuits at lower DEX doses compared to higher doses. A combination of DEX initial loading dose and continuous infusion resulted in steady concentrations of DEX over 4 hours. At therapeutically relevant concentrations of DEX (485-1,013 pg/ml), lower sequestration was observed in ex vivo CPB circuits compared to higher doses. The sequestration of DEX to circuits should be considered to achieve the optimal concentration of DEX during CPB surgery.

Effects of perineural administration of ropivacaine combined with perineural or intravenous administration of dexmedetomidine for sciatic and saphenous nerve blocks in dogs.

To evaluate the effects of using ropivacaine combined with dexmedetomidine for sciatic and saphenous nerve blocks in dogs. 7 healthy adult Beagles. In phase 1, dogs received each of the following 3 treatments in random order: perineural sciatic and saphenous nerve injections of 0.5% ropivacaine (0.4 mL/kg) mixed with saline (0.9% NaCl) solution (0.04 mL/kg; DEX0PN), 0.5% ropivacaine mixed with dexmedetomidine (1 μg/kg; DEX1PN), and 0.5% ropivacaine mixed with dexmedetomidine (2 μg/kg; DEX2PN). In phase 2, dogs received perineural sciatic and saphenous nerve injections of 0.5% ropivacaine and an IV injection of diluted dexmedetomidine (1 μg/kg; DEX1IV). For perineural injections, the dose was divided equally between the 2 sites. Duration of sensory blockade was evaluated, and plasma dexmedetomidine concentrations were measured. Duration of sensory blockade was significantly longer with DEX1PN and DEX2PN, compared with DEX0PN; DEX1IV did not prolong duration of sensory blockade, compared with DEX0PN. Peak plasma dexmedetomidine concentrations were reached after 15 minutes with DEX1PN (mean ± SD, 348 ± 200 pg/mL) and after 30 minutes DEX2PN (816 ± 607 pg/mL), and bioavailability was 54 ± 40% and 73 ± 43%, respectively. The highest plasma dexmedetomidine concentration was measured with DEX1IV (1,032 ± 415 pg/mL) 5 minutes after injection. Results suggested that perineural injection of 0.5% ropivacaine in combination with dexmedetomidine (1 μg/kg) for locoregional anesthesia in dogs seemed to balance the benefit of prolonging sensory nerve blockade while minimizing adverse effects.

Age-Specific Dose Regimens of Dexmedetomidine for Pediatric Patients in Intensive Care Following Elective Surgery: A Phase 3, Multicenter, Open-Label Clinical Trial in Japan.

To demonstrate the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of dexmedetomidine as a potential sedative for pediatric surgery patients in the ICU. Phase 3, multicenter, open-label study. This study included 61 patients at 13 tertiary hospitals in Japan. Pediatric patients (≥ 45 wk corrected gestational age to < 17 yr) undergoing intensive care treatment with mechanical ventilation requiring greater than 6 hours estimated duration of sedation following elective cardiac surgery. Dexmedetomidine was IV administered without a loading dose at age-specific dose regimens 0.2-1.4 (< 6 yr) and 0.2-1.0 µg/kg/hr (≥ 6 yr). The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients who did not require a rescue sedative (midazolam) infusion during mechanical ventilation or for the first 24 hours of a greater than 24 hours ventilation following the commencement of dexmedetomidine administration. Overall, 47 of the 61 patients (77.0%) did not require rescue midazolam. Adverse events were reported in 53 patients (86.9%). Frequently observed adverse events were hypotension (47.5%), bradycardia (31.1%), and respiratory depression (26.2%). Most of these adverse events were mild, a few moderate, and none severe. Although serious adverse events occurred in four patients, including one cardiac tamponade resulting in the withdrawal of dexmedetomidine, none of the adverse events resulted in mortality or were directly related to dexmedetomidine. The plasma dexmedetomidine concentration generally reached the target concentration of 0.3-1.25 ng/mL at 1-2 hours prior to completion of administration or immediately prior to the commencement of tapering. The age-specific dose regimens of dexmedetomidine without an initial loading dose achieved an adequate sedation level during mechanical ventilation and caused no clinically significant adverse events in the intensive care pediatric patients. These effects were achieved within the therapeutic range of dexmedetomidine plasma concentration and were accompanied by minimal effects on hemodynamics and respiration.

Lipid Emulsion Enhances Vasoconstriction Induced by Dexmedetomidine in the Isolated Endothelium-Intact Aorta.

This study aimed to examine the effect of lipid emulsion (LE) on the vasoconstriction induced by dexmedetomidine (DMT) in the isolated rat aorta and elucidate the associated cellular mechanism. The effect of LE, NW-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME), and methyl-β-cyclodextrin (MβCD) on the DMT-induced contraction was examined. We investigated the effect of LE on the DMT-induced cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) formation and DMT concentration. The effect of DMT, LE, 4-Amino-3-(4-chlorophenyl)-1-(t-butyl)-1H-pyrazolo[3,4-d]pyrimidine,4-Amino-5-(4-chlorophenyl)-7-(t-butyl)pyrazolo[3,4-d]pyrimidine (PP2), and rauwolscine on the phosphorylation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS), caveolin-1, and Src kinase was examined in the human umbilical vein endothelial cells. L-NAME, MβCD, and LE (1%, standardized mean difference (SMD): 2.517) increased the DMT-induced contraction in the endothelium-intact rat aorta. LE (1%) decreased the DMT (10−6 M) concentration (SMD: −6.795) and DMT-induced cGMP formation (SMD: −2.132). LE (1%) reversed the DMT-induced eNOS (Ser1177 and Thr496) phosphorylation. PP2 inhibited caveolin-1 and eNOS phosphorylation induced by DMT. DMT increased the Src kinase phosphorylation. Thus, LE (1%) enhanced the DMT-induced contraction by inhibition of NO synthesis, which may be caused by the decreased DMT concentration. DMT-induced NO synthesis may be caused by the increased eNOS (Ser1177) phosphorylation and decreased eNOS (Thr495) phosphorylation potentially mediated by Src kinase-induced caveolin-1 phosphorylation.

Changes in Plasma Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein in Children Receiving Sevoflurane Anesthesia: A Preliminary Randomized Trial.

We investigated changes in plasma glial fibrillary acidic protein concentration during sevoflurane anesthesia induction in children < 3 years old and determined the effect of co-administering dexmedetomidine. This preliminary randomized trial included 60 pediatric patients who received sevoflurane anesthesia for >3 h. Patients were assigned to dexmedetomidine or control groups at a 1:1 ratio. The primary outcome was changes in plasma glial fibrillary acidic protein concentration of dexmedetomidine and control groups over time. Fifty-five patients were included in the final analysis. The median (interquartile range (IQR)) of the plasma glial fibrillary acidic protein level was 387.7 (298.9–510.8) pg·mL−1 immediately after anesthetic induction, 302.6 (250.9–412.5) pg·mL−1 at 30 min, and 321.9 (233.8–576.2) pg·mL−1 at 180 min after the first sample. These values did not change over time (p = 0.759). However, plasma glial fibrillary acidic protein increased after 180 min of infusion of dexmedetomidine compared with values at 30 min infusion (p = 0.04, mean difference and 95% confidence interval of 221.6 and 2.2 to 441.0 pg·mL−1). In conclusion, three hours of sevoflurane anesthesia in pediatric patients < 3 years old did not provoke neuronal injury assessed by the plasma biomarker. Further studies regarding the effect of prolonged dexmedetomidine infusion on anesthetic neuronal injury are required.

Dose dependent reduction in median effective concentration (EC50) of ropivacaine with adjuvant dexmedetomidine in labor epidural analgesia: An up-down sequential allocation study

Study objectiveAdjuvant dexmedetomidine can be used to reduce the required concentration of ropivacaine for labor epidural analgesia. However, the potency of dexmedetomidine has not been fully studied. The purpose of this study was to determine the median effective concentration (EC50) of ropivacaine with adjuvant dexmedetomidine. DesignProspective, double-blind, up-down sequential allocation study. SettingAcademic medical center specializing in the care of women and children. PatientsOne hundred and fifty healthy, term parturients requesting labor epidural analgesia were randomly assigned to 1 of 5 different concentrations of dexmedetomidine: 0 μg/ml, 0.3 μg/ml, 0.4 μg/ml, 0.5 μg/ml, or 0.6 μg/ml. InterventionsThe study solution for the first patient in each group included the randomly assigned concentration of dexmedetomidine in 0.1% ropivacaine. Subsequent patients in each randomization group received the assigned concentration of dexmedetomidine in a new concentration of ropivacaine as determined by the up-down allocation methodology. Effective analgesia was defined as pain on the visual analogue scale of<3 at30 min after administration of local anesthetic. The up-down sequential allocation method and probit regression were used to calculate the EC50 of epidural ropivacaine. MeasurementsThe primary outcome was pain 30 min after administration of local anesthetic via epidural catheter. Exploratory outcomes included side effects, neonatal outcomes, and obstetric outcomes. Main resultsThe EC50 values for ropivacaine in dexmedetomidine 0.4 μg/ml, 0.5 μg/ml, and 0.6 μg/ml (0.044% [95% CI 0.036% to 0.045%], 0.035% [95% CI 0.031% to 0.041%], and 0.039% [95% CI 0.034% to 0.045%], respectively) were lower compared to ropivacaine in dexmedetomidine 0 μg/ml and 0.3 μg/ml (0.086% [95% CI 0.081% to 0.092%], and, 0.069% [95% CI 0.056% to 0.076%], respectively). Differences between EC50 values for ropivacaine in dexmedetomidine 0.4 μg/ml, 0.5 μg/ml, and 0.6 μg/ml were not statistically significant. Results of our exploratory analyses did not reveal differences in side effects, neonatal outcomes, or obstetric outcomes. ConclusionsIn this study, the lowest concentration of dexmedetomidine in ropivacaine with the greatest clinical effect was 0.4 μg/ml, which is important because there may be no additional analgesic benefit of dexmedetomidine greater than 0.4 μg/ml.

Comparison of different concentration of dexmedetomidine added to ropivacaine in ultrasound guided supraclavicular block for orthopedic forearm surgery-a prospective, randomized, comparative clinical study

There is no fix and ideal dose is known for dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant in brachial plexus block. So this study was performed to evaluate different doses of dexmedetomidine added to 0.5% ropivacaine, with the primary outcome of the duration of analgesia. Secondary outcomes included the effect on block characteristics, sedation, hemodynamics and adverse effects.Totally 60 adult patients were randomly allocated to two equal groups (n = 30) using computer generated randomization. Patients in Group RD50 received 24 ml 0.5% ropivacaine + 50 µg of dexmedetomidine and Group RD100 received 24 ml 0.5% ropivacaine + 100 µg of dexmedetomidine in ultrasonography guided supraclavicular block.The primary aim was the duration of analgesia and secondary aim were onset and duration of the sensorimotor blockade, hemodynamic variables, sedation score, and adverse effects The data were interpreted with the help of t-test and Chi-square test.In group RD50, the onset of both sensory and motor block was 8.18 ± 1.49 min and 14.11 ± 2.09 min, respectively, while in group RD100 it was 8.23 ± 1.41 min and 14.06 ± 2.44 min, respectively. The duration of analgesia was similar in both groups (862.32 ± 45.51 vs. 864.43 ± 44.02 min; P &amp;#62;.05). The occurrence of bradycardia was observed significantly greater in RD100 group patients.The addition of 100 µg dexmedetomidine to ropivacaine has similar effects on block characteristics and duration analgesia with a higher incidence of bradycardia as compare to 50 µg.

The efficacy and safety of intrathecal dexmedetomidine for parturients undergoing cesarean section: a double-blind randomized controlled trial

BackgroundThe efficacy and safety of spinal anesthesia by intrathecal dexmedetomidine (DEX) for parturients undergoing cesarean section are still lack of evidence. This aim of our study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intrathecal DEX for parturients undergoing cesarean section to provide more data evidence for intrathecal applications.MethodsThree hundred parturients undergoing cesarean section under spinal anesthesia were randomly assigned into three groups: group B: 9.0 mg (1.2 ml) of 0.75% bupivacaine with saline (1 ml); group FB: 9.0 mg (1.2 ml) of 0.75% bupivacaine with 20 μg of fentanyl (1 ml); group DB: 9.0 mg (1.2 ml) of 0.75% bupivacaine with 5 μg of DEX (1 ml). Intraoperative block characteristics, parturients’ postoperative quality of recovery, maternal and neonatal outcomes and the plasma concentration of DEX were measured. All parturients were followed up for 30 days to determine whether nerve injury occurred.ResultsCompared with group B, the duration of sensory block in group FB and group DB were significantly prolonged (108.4 min [95% Confidence Interval (CI) = 104.6–112.3] in group B, and 122.0 min [95% CI = 116.8–127.3] in group FB, 148.2 min [95% CI = 145.3–151.1] in group DB). The overall score of quality recovery in group DB (71.6 [95% CI = 71.0–72.2]) was significantly higher than that in group FB (61.5 [95% CI = 60.8–62.2]) and group B (61.7 [95% CI = 61.0–62.4]). There was no statistically significant difference among the three groups for PH, PaO2, and PaCO2 of newborn. The plasma concentration of DEX in umbilical artery and umbilical vein was low and cannot be detected. The 30-days follow-up of parturients did not show any new onset of back, buttock or leg pain or paresthesia.ConclusionsDEX is a potential local anesthetic adjuvant that the intrathecal combination of 5 μg DEX can safely exhibit a facilitatory block effect and improve parturients’ recovery quality.Trial registrationChinese Clinical Trial Registry (Registration number # ChiCTR1900022019; Date of Registration on March 20th, 2019).

Dexmedetomidine protects PC12cells from ropivacaine injury through miR-381/LRRC4 /SDF-1/CXCR4 signaling pathway.

IntroductionRopivacaine has been regularly used because of its good anesthetic and analgesic effects, but it may exert neurotoxic effects on neurocyte. Dexmedetomidine has presented special advantages in the fields of neuroprotection, and it also could improve peripheral nerve block combining with ropivacaine. However, if dexmedetomidine could repair neurocyte injury induced by ropivacaine, and the specific mechanism remain unclear.MethodsWestern blotting and qRT-PCR were applied for measuring expression of protein and mRNA, respectively. Flow cytometry was used for assessing apoptosis. Cell proliferation was detected using Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8) and colony formation assays. Transwell assay was applied to measure the migration and invasion of cells. Dual luciferase reporter assay was applied for confirming the binding site between microRNA-381 (miR-381) and Leucine-rich repeat C4 protein (LRRC4).ResultsThe viability of PC12 cells increased with raising the concentration of dexmedetomidine (0 μM, 10 μM, 50 μM, 100 μM). Dexmedetomidine reversed role of ropivacaine (0 mM, 0.1 mM, 0.5 mM, 1 mM) by upragulating the expression of miR-381 and suppressing the expression of LRRC4 in PC12 cells. miR-381 can directly interact with target gene LRRC4 and negatively regulate its expression. Dexmedetomidine promoted the proliferation, migration, and invasion and inhibited apoptosis of PC12 cells by suppressing LRRC4 via up-regulating the expressions of miR-381 and further activated SDF-1/CXCR4 signaling pathway.ConclusionsDexmedetomidine could protect PC12 cells from ropivacaine injury through miR-381/LRRC4/SDF-1/CXCR4 signaling pathway. This study may provide new therapeutic strategy targeting miR-381/LRRC4/SDF-1/CXCR4 signaling pathway about the prevention of ropivacaine induced neurocyte injury.