Concentration Of Banking System Research Articles

CONCENTRATION OF THE UKRAINIAN BANKING SYSTEM: PROBLEMS AND PROSPECTS

The article examines the relevance of the issue of concentration of the banking system of Ukraine and identifies the main prospects for reducing the share of the state in the banking services market. The period from 2009-2022 inclusive was chosen for analysis and evaluation, which made it possible to identify the main trends and factors that influenced the growth and decline of such concentration indices as Herfindahl–Hirschman Index and CR in terms of the following indicators: assets, corporate loans, retail deposits, authorised capital, commission income, and interest income. The obtained calculations helped to determine the level of concentration of the domestic banking system. The purpose of the article is to allocate scientific approaches and carry out practical calculations to determine the degree of concentration of the banking system and to determine the need for its deconcentration. The results of the analysis demonstrate the growing scientific interest of both domestic and foreign economic schools in the problem of concentration in the banking system. However, it is worth noting that the peak of publication activity was observed in 2018-2020, with the top three countries being the United States of America, the United Kingdom, and Malaysia. The results of the calculations showed that the number of banks in Ukraine does not have a significant impact on the level of concentration. With a fairly large number of banks in 2013, namely 180 institutions, there was a sharp increase in concentration, but a larger share of the market was controlled by private capital, but since 2017, a larger share of the banking sector has been owned by the state. The author notes that the concentration of market power by state-owned banks has led to the emergence of a monopoly, but transformational measures to reduce the concentration of the banking system should be carried out taking into account the existing financial and economic feasibility. Of course, there is a risk of ineffective management decisions by bank management, but it is the largest state-owned banks that demonstrate the sustainability and profitability of their activities.

EFFICIENCY OF THE ACTIVITIES OF BANKING INSTITUTIONS IN UKRAINE

Introduction. The article examines statistical data on the number of banks that have a banking license, banks with foreign capital and the dynamics of the influence of foreign capital on the Ukrainian banking system in 2010–2021. The analysis of the dynamics of bank assets and liabilities and the share of bank assets in the gross domestic product is carried out of Ukraine in 2010–2021. The structure of ownership of the assets of the banking system, the dynamics of income, expenses, financial results, return on assets (ROA) and return on capital (ROE) of banks of Ukraine were studied. The conclusions regarding the current state and efficiency of operations were substantiated banks in 2010–2021. The purpose of the article is to analyze the efficiency of banking institutions in Ukraine in 2010–2021, to assess the capital concentration of the Ukrainian banking system and to substantiate the directions for increasing the efficiency of the functioning of the Ukrainian banking sector in modern conditions. Methods. Statistical methods, methods of techno-economic and financial analysis and observation are used to study development trends, the current state of functioning of the banking system of Ukraine. Statistical and graphic methods are used for processing and generalization of statistical data and their display in tables and figures. On the basis of the dialectical method of cognition, the ownership structure of the banking system, the dynamics of income, expenses, financial results, return on assets (ROA) and return on capital (ROE) of Ukrainian banks are summarized. The system method was used when studying the level of concentration of the banking system. Results. The study of trends in the development of the main indicators of banks' activity in Ukraine shows that during the analyzed period the number of commercial banks systematically decreased. At the same time, during the same period, the value of assets and liabilities of the banking sector increased. Banks occupy the leading place in the financial services market of Ukraine. However, for the modern banking system, there is a noticeable tendency towards a gradual decrease in the share of bank assets in GDP. In the analyzed period, the ownership structure of the banking system underwent significant regrouping in the groups of banks with a state share, banks of foreign banking groups, and banks with private capital. As a result of the transfer in 2016 of the system JSC CB “Pryvatbank” to 100% ownership of the state, the share of state banks in the structure of assets of the banking system has increased significantly. The banking market of Ukraine is concentrated, as evidenced by the values of the share of the largest bank in net assets (CR1), the five largest banks in net assets (CR5), the ten largest banks in net assets (CR10), the largest twenty banks in net assets ( CR20) and the Herfindahl-Hirschman index (HHI). The volume of non-performing loans (NPL) in Ukrainian banks was considered. Conclusions. Today, the banking sector has successfully adapted to work in the conditions of a pandemic and martial law and is properly performing its functions, supporting the economy. According to the results of recent years, the banking sector has been making profits. The profitability of assets and capital of the banking sector is growing. Increasing the efficiency of Ukrainian banks through cost reduction, the search for new sources of income, mainly commissions, through expanding the areas of interaction between banks and clients, in particular remote banking services, the use of modern innovations, financial technologies requires further scientific research.

The Interrelationship Among Efficiency and Concentration of Banking System and its Stability: Evidence from Poland

The Interrelationship Among Efficiency and Concentration of Banking System and its Stability: Evidence from Poland

The impact of the banking system concentration level and the pandemic on the Georgian banking sector

Introduction. The importance of the banking sector is vital for the economic development of any country, since it is the main structural unit of monetary use, which plays the greatest role in the development of the state. As in all markets, we are faced with competition in the banking market, which is characterized by certain specifics, since the main product is money that cannot be replaced by other goods, and the main purpose of competition is to gain an advantage among agents operating in the same market, which is reflected in the final profit. The more the banking market develops and the more diversified the services offered to clients, the more the role of competition in the banking sector increases. The spread of the pandemic not only impeded the development of healthy competition, but also called into question the normal functioning and development of the banking sector.
 Aim and tasks. The aim of the study is to determine the level of competition in the Georgian banking sector by the method of identifying total assets and net loans, which aims to identify the causes of the market concentration level and find solutions, as well as to determine and assess the shock effects of the pandemic, because The pandemic period has become an even bigger challenge for the Georgian banking sector, where most of the market players occupy a small volume of the market, the National Bank of Georgia is actively trying to keep up with the challenges, and in order to mitigate the negative impact caused by the pandemic
 Results. The results of the study showed the monopoly functioning of the market, which is an obstacle to the development of a competitive market, resulting in unhealthy functioning of the market and the development of a flexible banking system, which ultimately negatively affects the stability of the country's economic development. As for the post-pandemic situation, it has been dealt with quite positively in Georgia, with the management of loan and deposit portfolios successfully managed through a temporary supervisory plan developed by the government, which has not been followed by outflow of funds from banks and loan portfolio mismanagement.
 Conclusions. In conclusion, it should be noted that in a highly concentrated market, small banks should be promoted with various legislative benefits, which will lead to competition, it is possible to impose a so-called "Capital tax", which implies high demands on capital, it will allow small banks to develop in a healthy competitive environment. Despite the fact that no bank was disrupted during the virus shock in Georgia, the financial result was so unfavorable, it was damaged, the main reason for which was the provision of possible losses on loans, which amounted to a total of 1.22 billion GEL, the National Bank of Georgia is actively trying to keep up with the challenges.

Post‐financial crisis changes in financial system structure: An examination of the J.P. Morgan & Co. Syndicates after the 1907 Panic

AbstractIn the post‐2008 crisis period, policy makers debate the implications of banking system concentration. To shed light on this debate, we study a postcrisis period in which less banking regulation existed than in the present period, reasoning that an examination of a less regulated market might reveal useful insights about present day market agents' postcrisis actions. The years immediately following the Panic of 1907 merit study because the period shares important features with the post‐2008 crisis financial system: increasing interconnectedness, the growing complexity accompanying the rise of new industries, the rapid deployment of new communications technologies, and substantial innovation in financial instruments. Because the 1907 crisis preceded the Clayton Anti‐Trust Act of 1914, it also provides a window into studying market agents' behavior before legislation was enacted to discourage banking system concentration. We find evidence that the market share of corporate bond underwritings at J.P. Morgan & Co. increased in the post‐1907 crisis period. We suggest a mechanism by which market share increased: a more concentrated configuration of corporate bond underwriting syndicates. We also indicate that Morgan's increased share may have been a proxy for increased certification value of underwriter reputation because of systemic knowledge Morgan gained during the resolution of the Panic of 1907 rather than for increasing bargaining power. We do not find evidence that Morgan used market power to extract rents from issuers despite increased market share and more concentrated syndicate organization. While our results must be interpreted cautiously due to data limitations, possible lessons for present‐day policy makers are that consolidations in the financial system after a financial crisis are complex. Some consolidations may come about from information and reputational gains produced during the crisis. Others may be moves by some firms to concentrate market power and still others from efforts to improve efficiencies in intermediation.

The Determinants of Bond Market Development: Further Evidence from Emerging and Developed Countries

The objective of this paper is to empirically investigate the structural, financial, developmental, institutional, and macroeconomic determinants of bond market development for a sample of 22 emerging and developing countries over the period 1990–2013. We employ both the Prais-Winston and system GMM procedures to tackle the problems of endogeneity among the explanatory variables and our measure of bond market development, group-wise heteroscedasticity, and contemporaneous cross-sectional and serial correlations in the residuals. Our results suggest that a combination of structural, financial and institutional factors seem to exert a significant effect on bond markets. Indeed, economic size, trade openness, investment profile, GDP per Capita, bureaucratic quality, and size and concentration of banking system are positively related to bond market development, while interest rate volatility and fiscal balance are negatively associated with the development of bond markets. Those results are robust to the inclusion of developed countries' bond markets, international bonds issuers, and to possible structural breaks.

What Drives Interest Rate Spreads in Pacific Island Countries? An Empirical Investigation

Growth has been sluggish in Pacific island countries (PICs). High cost of credit is likely one of the reasons. While the small scale, geographic dispersion, and vulnerability to shocks increase the cost and risk of credit in this country group, there is considerable variability in interest rate spreads both across countries and over time. This paper examines the determinants of lending rates and interest rate spreads in a panel of six PICs, extending the literature that was largely descriptive in nature or focused on a single country. Our results are in line with economic theory. We find that the size of the economy is negatively correlated with spreads, confirming the importance of scale. Inflation appears to have only marginal impact on spreads. High loan loss provisions and nonperforming loans increase the cost of credit. So does banking system concentration. Higher institutional quality is associated with lower spreads.

What Drives Interest Rate Spreads in Pacific Island Countries? An Empirical Investigation

Growth has been sluggish in Pacific island countries (PICs). High cost of credit is likely one of the reasons. While the small scale, geographic dispersion, and vulnerability to shocks increase the cost and risk of credit in this country group, there is considerable variability in interest rate spreads both across countries and over time. This paper examines the determinants of lending rates and interest rate spreads in a panel of six PICs, extending the literature that was largely descriptive in nature or focused on a single country. Our results are in line with economic theory. We find that the size of the economy is negatively correlated with spreads, confirming the importance of scale. Inflation appears to have only marginal impact on spreads. High loan loss provisions and nonperforming loans increase the cost of credit. So does banking system concentration. Higher institutional quality is associated with lower spreads.

Banking system concentration and unemployment in developing countries

This paper studies the effect of banking system concentration on unemployment in developing countries. Using data on 42 developing countries, it finds that more concentration increased unemployment over the period 1987–2007. The magnitude of the effect is substantial. The result is robust to both endogeneity of the bank concentration variable and numerous variations in specification. It is important because many developing countries are characterized by high levels of both banking system concentration and unemployment.

BANKING SYSTEM CONCENTRATION AND LABOR MARKET PERFORMANCE IN INDUSTRIAL COUNTRIES

Using data on 21 industrial countries from the period 1987 to 2009 and a large number of controls, this paper finds that a more concentrated banking sector is likely to raise the unemployment rate and reduce the employment rate. The magnitude of these effects appears to be moderate. The results are robust to potential endogeneity of the bank concentration variable as well as to numerous variations in specification. They are important because, as a consequence of the recent global financial crisis, many industrial countries have experienced both an increase in banking system concentration and a deterioration in labor market performance. (JEL E24, G21, J64, L16)

Does Bank Concentration Increase Credit Risk-Taking Behaviour? Evidence from SADC

In this study, we assess whether banking system concentration is strongly linked to banks credit risk exposure. We use a sample of 138 commercial banks drawn from SADC countries between 1999 and 2005. The results exhibit no significant influence of concentration on four measures of credit risk-taking behavior using three different estimation methods. Furthermore, the study concludes that the SADC banking sector was relatively stable during the second phase of banking reforms. The research also identifies two categories of factors that impact on credit risk in the SADC banking system. The first category relates to bank specific factors mainly cost-to-income ratio (COIR) and prices for bank lending and deposit products. In general, we find that of the bank-specific factors NIM, COIR and prices for loans and deposits to be significantly related to credit risk-taking behaviour. The second category relates to the macro environment and the result identify inflation and credit demand as having a positive and significant influence on bank credit risk.

Are Competitive Banking Systems More Stable?

Using the Panzar and Rosse H‐statistic as a measure of competition in 45 countries, we find that more competitive banking systems are less prone to experience a systemic crisis and exhibit increased time to crisis. This result holds even when we control for banking system concentration, which is associated with higher probability of a crisis and shorter time to crisis. Our results indicate that competition and concentration capture different characteristics of banking systems, meaning that concentration is an inappropriate proxy for competition. The findings suggest that policies promoting competition among banks, if well executed, have the potential to improve systemic stability.

Does the Banking Sector Affect Sovereign Risk

We examine the effects of liquidity in the banking system (proxy for financial sector sophistication) and the degree of competition in the banking sector within a nation on sovereign risk. We hypothesize that more competitive and sophisticated financial systems will be less prone to panics or bank runs, and, consequently, be associated with superior sovereign credit ratings. Using Ordered Probit with Aggregate Time Effects methodology, our results show that financial system variables such as Concentration in Banking System, Size of Financial System, and Liquidity of Banking Assets are significantly related to sovereign credit ratings. Since the use of these sovereign ratings is ubiquitous in international finance in varied applications such as determination of the cost of international borrowing by governments, international cost of capital for FDI, and others, the relationships identified in this paper have important public policy implications.

A global analysis of culture and imperfect competition in banking systems

The high concentration of the banking sector is a cross-border phenomenon that has a strong impact on local and global economies. The primary goal of this paper is to analyse the factors that affect concentration in banking systems around the world. The innovation of this paper is that it combines economic, 'economic environment' and cultural variables as explanatory factors in this analysis. Among other things, it was found that regulation in the banking system helps ensure that it remains competitive. It was also found that cultural dimensions, such as power distance, have an impact on the level of concentration in the banking industry.

On measuring concentration in banking systems

Assuming a Pareto-type distribution of bank sizes, we investigate the effect of changes in Zipf's exponent ( α) and the sample size on the behavior of different concentration indices, such as the 3-bank concentration ratio, the Herfindahl–Hirschman index and the top 5%-concentration ratio. We derive analytical relations between these concentration indices and investigate the elasticity of these indices to changes in α and in the sample size N. We show different regimes under which each index can be used most appropriately. Our results are highly relevant for policymakers who rely on such concentration measures to derive public policy recommendations in banking.

Banking Competition and Capital Ratios

We use data for more than 2,600 European banks to test whether increased competition causes banks to hold higher capital ratios. Employing panel data techniques, and distinguishing between the competitive conduct of small and large banks, we show that banks tend to hold higher capital ratios when operating in a more competitive environment. This result holds when controlling for the degree of concentration in banking systems, inter-industry competition, characteristics of the wider financial system, and the regulatory and institutional environment.

Banking Competition and Capital Ratios

We use data for more than 2,600 European banks to test whether increased competition causes banks to hold higher capital ratios. Employing panel data techniques, and distinguishing between the competitive conduct of small and large banks, we show that banks tend to hold higher capital ratios when operating in a more competitive environment. This result holds when controlling for the degree of concentration in banking systems, inter-industry competition, characteristics of the wider financial system, and the regulatory and institutional environment.

On Measuring Concentration in Banking Systems

By assuming a Pareto-type distribution of bank sizes within banking systems, we investigate the effect of changes to Zipf's slope parameter (a) and the sample size to the behaviour of different concentration indexes, such as the 3-bank concentration ratio, the Herfindahl-Hirschman index and the 5%-concentration ratio. Analytical relations between these concentration indices are derived and the elasticity of these indexes to changes in a and the sample size N is also investigated. We show different regimes under which each index can be used most appropriately. Our results are relevant to researchers and policymakers who extensively employ these summary measures of concentration.

What Drives Bank Competition? Some International Evidence

Using bank-level data, Claessens and Laeven apply the Panzar and Rosse (1987) methodology to estimate the extent to which changes in input prices are reflected in revenues earned by specific banks in 50 countries' banking systems. They then relate this competitiveness measure to indicators of countries' banking system structures and regulatory regimes. The authors find systems with greater foreign bank entry and fewer entry and activity restrictions to be more competitive. They find no evidence that the competitiveness measure negatively relates to banking system concentration. Their findings confirm that contestability determines effective competition, especially by allowing (foreign) bank entry and reducing activity restrictions on banks. This paper - a product of the Financial Sector Operations and Policy Department - is part of a larger effort in the department to study competition in the financial sector.