이 연구의 목적은 학생부종합전형 평가에서 서류평가 자료 중 평가위원이 중점적으로 고려하는 전형자료를 확인하여 학생부종합전형의 정성적 평가 경향성을 분석하는데 있다. 이를 위해 전임사정관과 위촉사정관을 대상으로 AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process) 방법으로 조사하고 자료를 분석하였다. 연구 결과 모든 분석에서 평가위원별, 경력별, 대학유형별로 세부적으로 분석하였을 때는 순위가 다른 경우가 있었지만, 전반적으로 일정한 평가경향성을 확인할 수 있었다. 전반적으로 평가 경향성이 다르다고 보기는 어려웠지만 세부적으로는 다른 경우가 있어서 평가 경향 분석 결과가 입학사정관 교육에 활용되기를 기대한다. 조사 대상 입학사정관들의 소속 대학이 다양함에도 불구하고 평가경향성이 전반적으로 비슷하였다는 점에서 입학사정관의 자의에 따라 평가하기보다는 대체로 일관된 평가기준에 따라 정성적 평가가 이루어지고 있다고 볼 수 있었다. 이는 일부 언론에서 학생부종합전형을 ‘깜깜이 전형’으로 평하며 공정성에 대해 지적하는 데 대한 반박증거로도 활용될 수 있을 것이다. 본 연구에서 학생부종합전형 서류평가의 정성적 평가 과정에서 평가위원들의 평가 경향성에 대한 현상을 파악함으로써 학생부종합전형의 공정성 제고에 이바지할 수 있는 하나의 방안을 모색할 수 있었다. 평가 경향성 분석은 향후 학생부종합전형 평가 결과 공개에 활용할 수 있고 평가경향성 확인을 활용해 지속적으로 입학사정관 교육이 실시된다면 학생부종합전형의 공정성 확보에 기여할 수 있을 것이다.The purpose of this study is to analyze the assessor s tendency to evaluate document in the holistic admission system of student school life records and to provide suggestions on the fairness of in the holistic admission system. To achieve this objective, the survey was conducted on admissions officers using Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP) method. According to the study, in the first tier, school records and self-introduction books were shown in order. In the area of the school records section of the second tier, it was shown in order of academic grades, club activities, behavioral characteristics, and general opinions. In the self-introduction letter section of the second tier, it was shown in order of academic studies, school activities, and consideration and sharing. In the third tier s award-winning career, it was in order of the content of the award, the number of awards received, and within the course of career exploration and effort, and in the course of career desire uniformity. Within the self-regulated activities, the list was based on the activity contents and the role of the position, and within the club activities, the details of the application department and activities were followed. Within the volunteer work, it was shown in order of volunteer activities, service hours, and within the development situation of teaching and learning, achievement, detailed ability and speciality were shown in order. In the reading activity, the content of the reading and the volume of the reading were shown in order. As the result of this study, Overall, it was difficult to say that the evaluation trend was different, but there were cases in which each member of the survey was different, by experience, and by type of university. In particular, the qualitative assessment is well-evaluated based on a certain standard of assessment and the fairness of the assessment is ensured, given that the survey participants have a similar tendency toward overall evaluation, even though they are admissions officers belonging to various universities. Evaluation trend analysis can be used to disclose the results of a comprehensive student assessment in the future, and will further contribute to ensuring fairness in the assessment.
Read full abstract