Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment Tools Research Articles

FRAILTY ASSESSMENT FROM PAPER TO ONLINE: THE E-FI-CGA WEB APP

Abstract Background Early frailty assessment is crucial for improving care for older adults through enhancing frailty-informed care planning and execution. To increase the access and use of the established electronic Frailty Index based on the Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment tool, we developed an online software application: the web-based eFI-CGA. Methods End-user requirements primarily adapted the standalone version of the eFI-CGA and covered assessment competency, interface familiarity, accessibility and convenient use by front-line health professionals. Web app-bounded features included user-account authentication and authorization, user-space management, record-search and retrieval, and functions for data management, analysis and display. The web app development used the Microsoft Azure web server with the ASP.NET framework, combined Webforms and Model-View-Controller architecture, and C# programming language with standard client-side libraries incorporating scripting and mark-up languages. Results The web-based eFI-CGA was technically released and accessible online (efi-cga). Tests on the web pages for all the web pages (e.g., Home, Signup Login, Assessment, Search, and Analysis) using large sizes of systematically designed test data and mocked patient cohorts showed that the web software functions meet the requirements with 100% accuracy. Conclusion The web-based eFI-CGA provides a valuable remote frailty assessment and information retrieval method for healthcare professionals, promoting effective multidisciplinary integrated care of older adults. Further work is needed to allow the safe use of the web app. We are also planning a patient-oriented frailty assessment tool for community-dwelling older adults.

Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment and Geriatric Intervention in Older Patients with Newly Diagnosed Lymphoma: A Prospective Study

Introduction: Aggressive and indolent non-Hodgkin lymphomas have a median age at diagnosis of 70 years. Above this age, this population is very heterogeneous and clinical outcomes may be worsened due to patient's frailty phenotype. Very few studies of comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) guided approach to care have been published. Methods: A prospective follow-up with baseline CGA were performed in a cohort of consecutive patients older than 70 years with newly diagnosed Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma as standard of care. CGA tools are described in Table 1. Clinical outcome has been analyzed in patients diagnosed between May 2016 and March 2021. Results: Ninety-three consecutive patients (55.9% of them were women) were included in this analysis, with a median age of 81.1 years (+/- 5.7). 23 patients (24.7%) were classified as robust (type I), 30 patients (32.3%) as pre-frail (type II) with potentially reversable impairments, 38 patients (40.9%) as frail (type III), and only 2 patients (2.2%) as unfit (type IV). Patients' characteristics are shown in Table 1. All patients received antineoplastic therapy. Treatment modifications were carried out in 64.5% of patients based on CGA results. In the follow-up, with a median follow-up 27.3 months (range 18-74 months), the relapse rate was of 25.8%, with no differences between groups. Overall survival was around 2-fold higher among the fit patients (type I) (42.5 ±19.6 months) than in the disabled patient's group (types III-IV) (23.7 ±20.5 months) (p 0.002) Statistically significant differences in overall survival (p 0.002), response to treatment (p<0.001) and likelihood of increased frailty at the end of treatment (p 0.024) were observed among groups, with type III-IV patients showing worse overall survival (Figure 1), lower response rates, and higher incidence of frailty. Conclusion: Systematic CGA allows physicians to address the functional reserve or resilience in older patients with lymphoma in the need of antineoplastic treatment. A frailty-guide approach to care may allow to improve clinical outcomes in this group of high-risk patients.

Characterization of patients admitted to specialized geriatric acute care hospital units with the German version of the Standardized Evaluation and Intervention for Seniors at Risk (SEISAR) screening-instrument: a cross-sectional study

BackgroundThe Standardized Evaluation and Intervention for Seniors at Risk (SEISAR) screening tool records major geriatric problems, originally applied in the emergency department. Particularly, the distinction of compensated and uncompensated problems is an interesting and new approach. Therefore, we translated the SEISAR in German language and used it to characterize patients in specialized geriatric hospital wards in Germany and to gather initial experience regarding its usability and practicability.MethodsThe tool was translated by three independent specialists in geriatric medicine and backtranslated for quality-assurance by a non-medical English native speaker. In a second step, 8 acute care geriatric hospital departments used the translated version to characterize all consecutive patients admitted over a period of one month between December 2019 and May 2020 at time of admission.ResultsMost of the 756 patients (78%) lived in an own apartment or house prior to hospital admission. Participants had on average 4 compensated and 6 uncompensated problems, a Barthel-Index of 40 pts. on admission with a median increase of 15 points during hospital stay, and a median length of stay of 16 days in the geriatric hospital department.ConclusionSEISAR is an interesting standardized brief comprehensive geriatric assessment tool for the identification of compensated and uncompensated health problems in older persons. The data of this study highlights the number, variability, and complexity of geriatric problems in patients treated in specialized acute care geriatric hospital wards in Germany.Trial registrationGerman Clinical trial register (DRKS-ID: DRKS00031354 on 27.02.2023).

Development and initial validation of the Comprehensive Geriatric Oral Health Assessment Tool.

Improving the oral health of the elderly is crucial to improving their general health and quality of life. To reach this goal, it is necessary to start with a comprehensive oral health assessment and a detailed treatment plan. The aim of this study was, therefore, to develop a comprehensive Oral Health Assessment Tool for the geriatric population. Following a panel of experts' consultation, a clinical form and a self-assessment questionnaire were developed, encompassing eight domains: dental caries, periodontal diseases, partial and complete edentulism, oral soft tissue lesions, occlusion, xerostomia, temporomandibular joints, and oral or oral prostheses hygiene. Subsequently, a pilot study was conducted to appraise the clinical form and questionnaire involving 84 residents of an Iranian nursing home. After securing ethics approval, both the qualitative and quantitative aspects of the self-assessment questions' validity and reliability were assessed, and specificity and sensitivity were calculated. The mean age of the participants was 69.8 (±4.1) years, and 86% had less than 12 years of education. The questions regarding the number of remaining teeth and the number of decayed teeth had the highest sensitivity (97% and 88%), respectively. Questions regarding the presence of periodontitis and gingivitis had the highest specificity (both 100%). A Comprehensive Geriatric Oral Health Assessment Toolhas been developed and its validity and reliability evaluated in a pilot study. It should now be further evaluated in larger studies.

Exploring the completeness of comprehensive geriatric assessment in relation to care outcomes in hospitalized older patients

Exploring the completeness of comprehensive geriatric assessment in relation to care outcomes in hospitalized older patients

Prevalence of geriatric syndromes and associated risk factors among older adults

A descriptive study was done to assess the prevalence of geriatric syndromes and associated factors among 200 older adults admitted in general medical and geriatric wards in a tertiary hospital. A cross sectional study design with simple random sampling technique was used to select the participants. A comprehensive geriatric assessment tool and investigator prepared questionnaire on associated risk factors which were validated by experts were used. Descriptive statistics like frequency, percentage and inferential statistics like chi-square, ANOVA, student T-test were used. Nearly 56.5% of them were male and 67% of them were married. About 61% of them were unemployed, 46.5% of them had both diabetes mellitus and hypertension. Among the participants 55% had depressive symptoms, 70% of them had lower urinary tract symptoms, 59% had GI disturbances, 61.5% had mobility impairment, 74.5% had sleep disturbance, 57% had visual impairment, 34.5% had hearing impairment, 39.5% of them had muscle weakness, 51% had memory disturbances, 46.5% of them had functional decline, 55% had malnutrition. Average number of prevalence geriatric syndromes was 6. There was a significant relationship between geriatric syndromes and associated factors (p value< 0.05). A significant association was found between geriatric syndromes and age, BMI, previous hospitalization. (p value< 0.05).

The Association Between Medication Use in Older Women with Early-Stage Operable Primary Breast Cancer and Decision Regarding Primary Treatment.

Polypharmacy is one factor contributing to increased mortality, hospitalization, and adverse drug reactions in older adults. The aim of this study was to measure the prevalence of polypharmacy in a cohort of older women with early-stage operable primary breast cancer and the relationship of polypharmacy to primary treatment decision and functional status. A total of 139 patients with a new diagnosis of early-stage operable primary breast cancer proven histologically were recruited as part of a prospective study. The average age was 77 years. Assessment using a cancer-specific Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) tool was conducted within 6 weeks of diagnosis of breast cancer. Association was determined between number of medications and treatment decision and physical status as measured by the CGA outcomes. Additional analysis was performed to determine the associations above with polypharmacy defined by ≥5 daily medications, and if cardiovascular-related diseases have a role in the treatment decision. Polypharmacy was present in 48% of patients (n = 139). CGA determined that polypharmacy was associated with greater comorbidity (P < .001), reduced physical status rated by physicians (P = .009) and patients (P = .019), and reduced ability to perform activities of instrumental ADLs (P = .008). Similar findings were present in the analysis of cardiovascular-related diseases. This work suggests that patients with polypharmacy are more likely to be frail. The number of medications could help us screen patients who should go on to receive full CGA.

94 WORKING TOWARDS AN AGE-FRIENDLY HEALTH SYSTEM IN AN IRISH MODEL FOUR TERTIARY REFERRAL HOSPITAL

Abstract Background Traditional consult services represent an area where the evidence-based 4Ms framework might be applied. A 4M framework Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) consult form may help standardise the assessment of older persons outside of geriatric medicine. We aimed to incorporate a concise CGA tool based on the 4Ms within a geriatric medicine consult form. Methods Data from 100 geriatric medicine consult forms was entered onto an excel database. Each component was analysed, using descriptive statistics, for accuracy in completion, ability to contribute to referrers knowledge and a modified Delphi consensus model was used to inform the creation of a 4M framework-based concise CGA within the consult referral form. Time to completion was monitored. Results The median age of referred patients was 79 with a male:female ratio of 1:1. The average number of co-morbidities was 6, with 75% of patients having a significant vascular history, 30% a history of falls, and 16% diagnosed with delirium. 72% were on 5 or more medications. 53% had a complete Barthel index, with a median score of 12/20. What matters to the patient, clinical frailty score, mood and mental health were not well captured by the existing consult. These were incorporated, following consensus, into a ‘little g’, which takes between 4 and 15 minutes depending on user experience and patient complexity. Conclusion An evidence-based consult form, based on 4Ms, has been developed. Next steps are to introduce it to the next cohort of interns and assess efficiency and outcomes.

Japan Geriatrics Society "Statement for the use of telemedicine in geriatric care: Telemedicine as a complement to in-person medical practice": Geriatric Medical Practice Committee consensus statement.

Telemedicine has changed from a way to treat patients with limited access to hospitals to a necessary method of treatment for non-urgent conditions during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. There are two styles of telemedicine, namely "hybrid medical care" and "gateway medical care," which take advantage of the characteristics of online medical care and might become important in the near future. During hybrid medical care, a patient and their primary care physician have face-to-face medical care while simultaneously being examined by a specialist physician through telemedicine, leading to an overall improvement in the level of local medical care and expansion in the number of treatable diseases. Gateway medical practice is a form of telemedicine used for patients who would otherwise refuse or not receive in-person medical care to engage in consultation with a physician. Telemedicine allows physicians to determine disease severity and triage patients, while reducing unnecessary home visits, emergency hospitalizations and the spread of infection. Telemedicine is less intense than in-person medical care, and allows for easier collaboration with other healthcare providers. However, telemedicine is not optimal for conditions requiring a definitive diagnosis and a comprehensive understanding of the patient's medical history. It is limited by the patient's ability to use telemedicine devices, and the risk of accidental treatments and fraud. The use of telemedicine might result in the development of new, online comprehensive geriatric assessment tools and technologies. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2022; 22: 913-916.

Prevalence and factors associated with advance health directives in frail older inpatients

Advance health directives (AHD) can be used to explore and document patient preferences for treatment and are therefore an important aspect of care planning. To investigate the prevalence and factors associated with AHD among older inpatients. This retrospective study included 6449 patients, aged ≥65 years referred for specialist geriatric consultation between 2007 and 2018 in Queensland, Australia. The interRAI-Acute Care Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment tool was used to calculate a frailty index (FI), range 0-1, based on 52 possible deficits, and categorised into intervals of 0.1 for analysis. FI was also grouped according to previously reported cut points: fit (FI ≤0.25), moderately frail (FI >0.25-0.4), frail (FI >0.4-0.6) and severely frail (FI >0.6). An AHD was present in 1032 (16.0%) of 6449 patients. Those with an AHD were significantly frailer than those without an AHD (mean FI 0.52 vs 0.45; P < 0.001). Higher frailty (odds ratio (OR): 1.34 (1.27-1.40)), older age (OR: 1.04 (1.03-1.05)), living in an institution (OR: 1.33 (1.01-1.73)) and recent hospitalisation (OR: 1.42 (1.23-1.62)) were significantly associated with higher prevalence of AHD. Prevalence of AHD increased over time, from 7.6% (n = 66) in 2008 to 35.4% (n = 99) in 2017. The presence of AHD is associated with sociodemographic factors, as well as higher frailty levels. Prevalence of AHD among inpatients has increased over the past decade but remains modest.

Antibody response with SARS-CoV-2 inactivated vaccine (CoronaVac) in Turkish geriatric population

BackgroundSars-CoV-2 infection influences older individuals at the forefront, and there is still limited data on the COVID-19 vaccine response in the geriatric population. This study aimed to assess antibody response after vaccination with SARS-CoV-2 inactivated vaccine and examine possible factors affecting this response in a geriatric population.Methodsindividuals who have been on at least the 28th day after the second dose of the COVID-19 vaccine were included. Comprehensive geriatric assessment tools and the Clinical Frailty Scale were performed. SARS-CoV-2 spike-specific IgG antibodies were detected and, levels ≥1 U/ml were defined as seropositive, <1 U/ml were defined as seronegative.Resultsa total of 497 patients were included and divided into three groups according to the days past after the second dose of the vaccine (Group 1: 28–59 days, Group 2: 60–89 days and Group 3: 90 days and more). Groups included 188, 148 and 171 patients, respectively. Seropositivity rate in each group was 80.9,73.2 and 57.3%, respectively. In Groups 1 and 2, Charlson Comorbidity Index score was higher in the seronegative group (P = 0.023 and P = 0.011, respectively). In Group 3, the prevalence of frailty was significantly higher in the seronegative group (P = 0.002).Conclusionto the best of our knowledge, this is the first study assessing the antibody response after vaccination with Sars-CoV 2 inactivated vaccine in the Turkish geriatric population. Moreover, this is the first study revealing the relationship between antibody response and frailty. Larger studies are needed to confirm the antibody response duration and the association between frailty and COVID-19 vaccine response.

Validation of Abbreviated Form of the Multidimensional Prognostic Index (MPI): The BRIEF-MPI Project.

PurposeTo screen multidimensional frailty in older people, using a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) tool such as the multidimensional prognostic index (MPI), is a public health priority. Unfortunately, the screening tools available are not able to capture multidimensional frailty. In this work, we aimed to evaluate in a population of hospitalized and ambulatory older patients, the agreement between an abbreviated form of the MPI (ie, BRIEF-MPI) and the standard/full version.Participants and MethodsAll participants included in the study completed both versions of the MPI, brief and full, which share the following domains: 1) basic and 2) instrumental activities of daily living, 3) mobility/risk of pressure sores, 4) cognition, 5) nutrition, 6) comorbidity, 7) social and 8) number of medications. The agreement between the two instruments was reported using either the mean comparisons with a t-test matched sample, a simple correlation analysis and the Bland–Altman methodology.ResultsThe study sample included 110 participants (mean age=83.2 years, 51.8% women). The mean difference was statistically and clinically irrelevant (mean difference=0.01±0.10; p=0.27). The correlation between brief and full MPI versions was optimal (R=0.82, p<0.0001). Using the Bland–Altman methodology, we observed that only three participants over 110 (=2.73%) were outside the limits of agreement. The accuracy of BRIEF-MPI in predicting multidimensional frailty, as full MPI>0.66, was optimal (area under the curve=0.92, p<0.0001). A BRIEF-MPI value of 0.59 yielded the highest sensitivity and specificity in predicting multidimensional frailty.ConclusionBRIEF-MPI had a good agreement with the full/standard version of the MPI, making this tool as ideal for the screening of multidimensional frailty in older people.

Multidimensional Frailty and Vaccinations in Older People: A Cross-Sectional Study.

It is known that influenza, herpes zoster, pneumococcal and pertussis infections may increase morbidity and mortality in older people. Vaccinations against these pathogens are effective in older adults. Frailty seems to be an important determinant of vaccination rates, yet data supporting this association are still missing. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the prevalence of four recommended vaccinations (influenza, herpes zoster, pneumococcal and diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis) and the association with multidimensional frailty assessed using a self-reported comprehensive geriatric assessment tool, i.e., the multidimensional prognostic index (SELFY-MPI). Older participants visiting the outpatient clinic of Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria, Palermo, Italy were included. The SELFY-MPI questionnaire score was calculated based on eight different domains, while the vaccination status was determined using self-reported information. We included 319 participants from the 500 initially considered (63.8%). Vaccination against influenza was observed in 70.5% of the cases, whilst only 1.3% received the vaccination against diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis. Participants with higher SELFY-MPI scores were more likely to report vaccination against pneumococcus (45.6 vs. 28.3%, p = 0.01), whilst no significant differences were observed for the other vaccinations. In conclusion, the coverage of recommended vaccinations is low. Higher SELFY-MPI scores and vaccination status, particularly anti-pneumococcus, appear to be associated, but future studies are urgently needed for confirming that frailty is associated with vaccination status in older people.

Multidimensional frailty in older people in general practitioners’ clinical practice: the SELFY-MPI SIGOT project

The multidimensional prognostic index (MPI) is a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) tool exploring the multiple domains of older subject. The knowledge and the diffusion of self-assessment tools for identifying frailty in general medicine is still limited. The aim of our study is to determine the prevalence of frailty using a multidimensional frailty screening tool (SELFY-MPI) in a cohort of older adults, belonging to the general practitioner’s (GPs) experience. In the frame of a national educational program organized by the Italian Geriatric Hospital and Community Society (SIGOT), expert geriatricians carried-out local courses addressed to GPs, focused on multidimensional approach in primary care. A cross-sectional study of the SELFY-MPI, based on eight different domains, in the general practitioners’ outpatient clinic was performed among 50 GPs. SELFY-MPI risk score was used for dividing the participants in robust, pre-frail, or frail. A total of 526 participants (mean age: 77.7 years; females=55.3%) fulfilled the SELFY-MPI. The participants were, on average, independent in the activities of daily living, had a good mobility, but they reported some cognitive difficulties, and they can be considered at risk of malnutrition. A high prevalence of comorbidities and polypharmacotherapy was also present. The 20.2% of the sample lived alone, suggesting a potential social frailty. The mean SELFY-MPI score was 0.26 0.17: therefore, 21.67% of the participants were categorized as pre-frail, and 3.99% as frail. Pre-frailty and frailty are common in GPs experience. SELFY-MPI is a feasible screening tool for multidimensional frailty in the GPs clinical practice.

The Use and Knowledge of Validated Geriatric Assessment Instruments Among US Community Oncologists.

The use of a standardized geriatric assessment (GA) to inform treatment decisions in older adults with cancer improves quality of life, reduces treatment-related toxicity, and is guideline-recommended. This study aimed to assess community oncologists' knowledge and utilization of GAs. Between September 2019 and February 2020, practicing US-based oncologists were invited to attend live meetings and complete web-based surveys designed to collect information on treatment decision making and various practice-based challenges in oncology care. Among the 349 oncologists surveyed, 74% practiced in a community setting. Sixty percent did not use a formal GA to inform treatment decisions for any of their older patients; the most common reasons for not using a GA were "Too cumbersome to incorporate into routine practice" (44%) and "Adds no value beyond the comprehensive history and physical exam" (36%). Validated GA instruments used in routine clinical practice included: Mini-Mental State Exam (54%), Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (23%), Cancer and Aging Research Group toxicity tool (12%), and Chemotherapy Risk Assessment Scale for High-Age Patients tool (9%). Nineteen percent of oncologists were not aware of any validated GA instruments. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status and comorbidities were the most frequently used assessment factors to inform treatment decisions (88% and 73%, respectively). Many oncologists have not incorporated GA tools because of perceptions that GAs are difficult to implement or do not add any value. Increasing education of the benefits of GA-directed therapy could help to increase GA utilization among community oncologists.

Evaluation of the Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) tool as a predictor of postoperative complications following major oncological abdominal surgery in geriatric patients.

IntroductionThe concept of frailty extends beyond chronological age. Identifying frailty using a two-step approach, starting with the use of a screening tool (G8) followed by comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA), may be useful in guiding treatment decisions and follow-up. This study evaluated the association between G8 and CGA, and the risk of 90-day postoperative complications risk, in oncogeriatric patients.MethodsData on geriatric patients with major oncological abdominal surgery was retrospectively collected from our hospital records between 2016 and 2019. Patients with an impaired G8 screening score, who subsequently underwent CGA geriatric screening, were included. Postoperative complications were classified using the Clavien-Dindo classification (CD), and the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI). The association between the individual components of the geriatric assessment tools and the 90-day postoperative complications risk was analyzed.ResultsOne hundred and twelve patients, aged ≥ 70 years, operated for an intra-abdominal tumor with curative intent, were included. Seventy-six patients (67.9%) presented with an impaired G8, out of whom sixty-six (58.9%) had a CGA performed. On univariate analysis, altered nutritional status assessed by the Mini-Nutritional Assessment-Short Form was the only variable associated with higher postoperative total complication rate (p = 0.01). Patients with an impaired G8 had significantly more postoperative complications and higher 1-year mortality rates than patients with normal G8. Fifteen patients (13.4%) had grade III-IVb complications. A CCI > 50 was recorded in 16 patients (14.3%). All-cause 90-day postoperative mortality was 10.7%.ConclusionIdentifying an altered preoperative nutritional status, as part of the CGA, in patients screening positive for frailty, is a potentially modifiable risk factor that can enhance preoperative management and optimize treatment decision making. G8 may be a predictive factor for postoperative complications in oncogeriatric patients.

188 IMPROVING THE ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT OF FALLS IN OLDER PEOPLE BY THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT IN THE HOME

Abstract Background Falls among older adults are the injury pattern that causes the most morbidity and mortality. Assessing and managing these in the patients’ homes is challenging; it requires a comprehensive, systematic approach. This quality Improvement Project used a Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment for older adults who have suffered fall, carried out by an Emergency Department in the Home (EDITH) practitioner in the patient’s home. Aim: To improve the evaluation and management of older people who have fallen and are attended to by the Emergency Department in the Home. Methods This OD project was carried out using the HSE People’s Needs Defining Change model. A new, streamlined version of the Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment tool was developed and introduced, and this was implemented and altered over two PDSA cycles. Results Documentation of falls improved dramatically, from a median of three out of 12 domains included to a median of 11 domains included. Users’ feedback helped the CGA evolve and was incredibly positive about the change. Conclusion This project shows that a CGA can be used successfully in patients’ own homes to assess risk factors for falling. The HSE’s People’s Needs Defining Change can be used to implement community-based projects. The community CGA tool could be explored by other areas and organisations in the future.

100 SCREENING FOR SLEEP DISTURBANCE AS PART OF THE COMPREHENSIVE GERIATRIC ASSESSMENT

Abstract Background Sleep disturbance is common in the older patient, and has been associated with many common comorbidities, falls, impaired quality of life, and mortality. Sleep disturbance screening and management are important elements of the comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA). There are few sleep disturbance assessment tools, however, that have been validated for use in older patients, or in those with cognitive impairment. We sought to review the assessment and management of sleep disturbance within a regional integrated care outreach programme (ICOP), where the RU-SATED tool had been used. Methods From March–June’21 the notes of 30 consecutive patients, presenting to ICOP with cognitive complaints, were reviewed. Demographic and sleep disturbance data were collected, in addition to whether advice, treatment or further assessment for sleep disturbance was documented. Feedback from staff on the utility of the RU-SATED tool was also sought. Results Of those reviewed, the mean age was 80.3 (SD = 7.8), and the mean Montreal Cognitive Assessment score (MOCA) was 17.7 (SD = 5.9). Where data was available, the mean RU-SATED score was 7.6 (SD = 1.9), and 42% were frail (n = 11). The most commonly endorsed sleep symptom was sleep onset latency/sleep maintenance issues (n = 16). RU-SATED score did not significantly predict age, MOCA or frailty (p &amp;gt; 0.1 for all). Advice, treatment or further assessment of sleep disturbance was offered to 23% of patients (n = 7), and this was not predicted by overall RU-SATED score or by individual question responses (p &amp;gt; 0.1 for all). Staff also stated that they found elements of the tool difficult to explain and interpret. Conclusion Although the numbers are small, we have not found the RU-SATED tool to be helpful in guiding the management of sleep disturbance in our cohort. A more practical CGA tool is currently in development by the ICOP service.

Malnutrition and depression as predictors for 30-day unplanned readmission in older patient: a prospective cohort study to develop 7-point scoring system

BackgroundReadmission is related to high cost, high burden, and high risk for mortality in geriatric patients. A scoring system can be developed to predict the readmission of older inpatients to perform earlier interventions and prevent readmission.Methods We followed prospectively inpatients aged 60 years and older for 30 days, with initial comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) on admission in a tertiary referral centre. Patients were assessed with CGA tools consisting of FRAIL scale (fatigue, resistance, ambulation, illness, loss of weight), the 15-item Geriatric Depression Scale, Mini Nutritional Assessment short-form (MNA-SF), the Barthel index for activities of daily living (ADL), Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), caregiver burden based on 4-item Zarit Burden Index (ZBI), and cognitive problem with Abbreviated Mental Test (AMT). Demographic data, malignancy diagnosis, and number of drugs were also recorded. We excluded data of deceased patients and patients transferred to other hospitals. We conducted stepwise multivariate regression analysis to develop the scoring system.ResultsThirty-day unplanned readmission rate was 37.6 %. Among 266 patients, 64.7 % of them were malnourished, and 46.5 % of them were readmitted. About 24 % were at risk for depression or having depressed mood, and 53.1 % of them were readmitted. In multivariate analysis, nutritional status (OR 2.152, 95 %CI 1.151–4.024), depression status (OR 1.884, 95 %CI 1.071–3.314), malignancy (OR 1.863 95 %CI 1.005–3.451), and functional status (OR 1.584, 95 %CI 0.885–2.835) were included in derivation of 7 score system. The scoring system had maximum score of 7 and incorporated malnutrition (2 points), depression (2 points), malignancy (2 points), and dependent functional status (1 point). A score of 3 or higher suggested 82 % probability of readmission within 30 days following discharge. Area under the curve (AUC) was 0.694 (p = 0.001).ConclusionsMalnutrition, depression, malignancy and functional problem are predictors for 30-day readmission. A practical CGA-based 7 scoring system had moderate accuracy and strong calibration in predicting 30-day unplanned readmission for older patients.

Approaches and Challenges in the Management of Multiple Myeloma in the Very Old: Future Treatment Prospects.

The increasing incidence of geriatric patients with multiple myeloma has elevated concerns in clinical practice. While the introduction of novel therapeutic agents has substantially improved outcomes in younger patients with myeloma, poorer outcomes remain in older patients. Managing older patients requires a multidisciplinary team approach to consider factors that may influence both treatment selection and outcomes. Aging is associated with remodeling of vital organs, physiological downregulations of basal metabolism, susceptibility to multiple comorbidities with ultimate frailty, thereby contributing to the underrepresentation and exclusion of very old patients from clinical trials. Therefore, timely confirmation of a precise diagnosis is crucial for prompt initiation of treatment if the desired outcome is to be achieved. Adequate and judicious assessment using comprehensive geriatric assessment tools minimizes toxicities and treatment discontinuation. Initiating treatment with combinational therapy requires knowledge of indications and anticipated outcomes, as well as individualized therapy with appropriate dose-adjustment. Individualized therapy based on good clinical acumen and best practices obverts unwanted polypharmacy, preventing iatrogenic harm. This review will therefore address the approaches and challenges faced in managing myeloma in geriatric patients aged 80 years and older, highlighting recommended therapeutic strategies and future prospective regimens.