Complication Of Hip Replacement Surgery Research Articles

Prognosis for Peripheral Nerve Injuries after Hip Joint Arthroplasty.

Peripheral nerve damage is a rare complication of hip replacement surgery that severely impairs the therapeutic outcome. The aim of the present study was to determine the time needed for nerve recovery and re-storation of activity following iatrogenic damage during a primary or revision hip arthroplasty from an anterolateral approach and its relationship with the severity of damage. A prospectively collected database of 1107 patients treated with primary arthroplasty and 303 patients following revision arthroplasty (mean age 63 years, range 53 to 72 years) was analysed. This included 15 cases of palsy of the peroneal branch of the sciatic nerve and 7 of the femoral nerve. The mean follow-up was 3.6 years (minimum two years). The following risk factors were identified: dysplastic osteoarthritis, limb elongation, revision arthroplasty, female sex and post-traumatic osteoarthritis. All five patients demonstrating light palsy (Lovett score 3-5), and 9 out of the 17 with severe palsy (Lovett score 0-2) achieved full recovery. Of all patients, 63.6% regained nerve function after 4 weeks to 24 months (mean 17 months), with nine demonstrating complete recovery and five partial. Also, 66.6% patients regained femoral nerve function and 61.5%, sciatic nerve function. 1. The femoral nerve and the peroneal branch of the sciatic nerve demonstrate a similar pattern of functional recovery following damage. 2. All patients recovered from light palsy, and almost 2/3 of cases of severe palsy demonstrated partial or complete recovery. 3. Female sex is a significant risk factor.

Post-surgery and recovery experiences following one- and two-stage revision for prosthetic joint infection-A qualitative study of patients' experiences.

Deep prosthetic hip infection is a devastating complication of hip replacement surgery, and treatment often involves multiple revision surgeries with antibiotic chemotherapy to control the infection. The aim of this study was to explore patients’ experiences of early and longer-term recovery after one-stage or two-stage revision with an excised hip, a temporary cement spacer or a custom-made articulating spacer. We interviewed 32 participants taking part in a surgical trial at two time points (2–4 months and 18 months) following one- or two-stage revision surgery. The analytic approach was inductive using the constant comparative method to generate themes from the data. Participants’ early recovery after revision was characterised by a long hospital stay with burdensome antibiotics and limited physiotherapy provision. Participants undergoing two-stage revision with an excised hip or a cement spacer described severe mobility restrictions which affected all aspects of their lives, while those undergoing one-stage revision, or two-stage revision with an articulating spacer were more mobile and independent, with some limitations. Participants with a cement spacer also reported more pain than other treatment groups, while those with an articulating spacer appeared to perceive that their recovery was slow. At 18 months, participants in all groups described both improvements and losses in mobility and functional ability. Participants in all treatment groups expressed considerable emotional resilience during recovery from revision, which may be linked to opportunities to talk with the trial personnel. Participants identified the need for better information and psychological and physical support. Experience of recovery differs after one- and two-stage revision, and further in relation to the use of spacers. Mobility, function, independence and pain are important aspects of recovery which affect all aspects of day-to-day life. Increased information and more opportunities to talk and share experiences may provide psychological support during recovery.

Developments in imaging methods used in hip arthroplasty: A diagnostic algorithm.

Several imaging modalities can be used to diagnose complications of hip prosthesis placement. Despite progress in these imaging techniques, there are, as yet, no guidelines as to their respective indications. We formed a panel of experts in fields related to prosthesis imaging (radiology, nuclear medicine, orthopedic surgery) and conducted a review of the literature to determine the value of each modality for diagnosing complications following hip replacement. Few recent studies have investigated the benefits related to the use of the latest technical developments, and studies comparing different methods are extremely rare. We have developed a diagnostic tree based on the characteristics of each imaging technique and recommend its use. Computed topography was found to be the most versatile and cost-effective imaging solution and therefore a key tool for diagnosing the complications of hip replacement surgery.

Indomethacin induces differential effects on in vitro endochondral ossification depending on the chondrocyte's differentiation stage.

Heterotopic ossification (HO) is the abnormal formation of bone in soft tissues and is a frequent complication of hip replacement surgery. Heterotopic ossifications are described to develop via endochondral ossification and standard treatment is administration of indomethacin. It is currently unknown how indomethacin influences heterotopic ossification on a molecular level; therefore, we aimed to determine whether indomethacin might influence heterotopic ossification via impairing the chondrogenic phase of endochondral ossification. Progenitor cell models differentiating in the chondrogenic lineage (ATDC5, primary human bone marrow stem cells and ex vivo periosteal agarose cultures) were treated with increasing concentrations of indomethacin and a decrease in gene- and protein expression of chondrogenic and hypertrophic markers (measured by RT-qPCR and immunoblotting) as well as decreased glycosamino-glycan content (by alcian blue histochemistry) was observed. Even when hypertrophic differentiation was provoked, the addition of indomethacin resulted in decreased hypertrophic marker expression. Interestingly, when mature chondrocytes were treated with indomethacin, a clear increase in collagen type 2 expression was observed. Similarly, when ATDC5 cells and bone marrow stem cells were pre-differentiated to obtain a chondrocyte phenotype and indomethacin was added from this time point onward, low concentrations of indomethacin also resulted in increased chondrogenic differentiation. Indomethacin induces differential effects on in vitro endochondral ossification, depending on the chondrocyte's differentiation stage, with complete inhibition of chondrogenic differentiation as the most pronounced action. This observation may provide a rational behind the elusive mode of action of indomethacin in the treatment of heterotopic ossifications. © 2016 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 35:847-857, 2017.

Perioperative Morbidity and Mortality of Total Hip Replacement in Liver Transplant Recipients

This study aims to evaluate perioperative mortality and morbidity after total hip replacement in liver transplant recipients and suggesting safety guidelines. Hip replacement surgery is one of the most common elective surgeries even for organ transplant recipients. However, there is a paucity of literature addressing the morbidity and complications of hip replacement surgery for liver transplant recipients. We analyzed retrospectively 33 arthroplasty cases in 20 liver transplant recipients carried out in a single center from 2005 to 2011. All perioperative clinical and laboratory data were evaluated together with early and late morbidity and mortality. Of 2253 liver transplant recipients, 20 (0.9%) patients underwent 33 total hip arthroplasties. Thirty-two arthroplasties were performed for avascular necrosis of the femoral head, whereas only one was performed for osteoarthritis. There was no death, liver failure, or infection within 30 days after surgery. Three patients showed elevated liver enzyme more than 5 times the normal value, but it eventually decreased to normal within 1 week. Of 33 cases of arthroplasty, postoperative blood transfusion was needed in 14 cases with 1 case receiving more than 4 U. On long-term follow-up, no patients have developed periprosthetic fracture, implant loosening, or liver failure. All patients showed good to excellent postoperative Harris hip score. In this series, we can infer that hip replacement surgery in liver transplantation patients is safe and gives a reliably good result. Some preoperative conditions should be obtained to reduce postoperative morbidity.

Etiology, diagnosis and therapy of aseptic hip prosthesis loosening--a status assessment

Aseptic loosening of prostheses implants is the most common complication of hip replacement surgery and represents an increasing problem because of still rising numbers of primary arthroplasties. This study reviews the current scientific status of causes, diagnosis and therapeutical concepts on this theme in literature. We analyzed 6,386 cases on aseptic hip revision arthroplasties published in the international literature and separated the results for cup and femoral components. On this basis we deduced some recommendations for the operative procedure in aseptic hip revision surgery. The mean follow-up time of all studies was 6.8 years in the case of cemented and 4.0 years in the case of uncemented hip revision arthroplasty. As an average rate of rerevision, 15.1% was calculated for cemented cup revisions, 4.3% for uncemented cup revisions. Rates of aseptic loosening were 23.1% for cemented procedure, 8.8% for uncemented cup implants. Femoral revision implants showed an average aseptic loosening rate of 21.2% for cemented procedures and an average rate of rerevisions of 12.7%; uncemented procedures showed aseptic loosening in 4.4% of the cases and rerevision in 5.5%. For old, relatively immobile patients with reduced physical constitution, cemented reimplantation has still to be regarded as the method of choice. In young patients uncemented revision arthroplasty is to prefer both on the acetabular and the femoral side to achieve superior results with good long-term prognosis. Regarding the bony defects induced by loosening, bone grafting is recommended for cemented and uncemented reimplantation technique. In the case of aseptic hip revision arthroplasty, the therapeutical procedure has to be adapted especially to the age and general constitution of the patient as well as to the bony defects induced by prosthetic loosening. For the future, controlled studies should respect the initial condition of primary as well as revision arthroplasty in reporting the results.

Position of the prosthesis and the incidence of dislocation following total hip replacement

Dislocation is the second most common complication of hip replacement surgery, and impact of the prosthesis is believed to be the fundamental reason. The present study employed Solidworks 2003 and MSC-Nastran software to analyze the three dimensional variables in order to investigate how to prevent dislocation following hip replacement surgery. Computed tomography (CT) imaging was used to collect femoral outline data and Solidworks 2003 software was used to construct the cup model with variabilities. Nastran software was used to evaluate dislocation at different prosthesis positions and different geometrical shapes. Three dimensional movement and results from finite element method were analyzed and the values of dislocation resistance index (DRI), range of motion to impingement (ROM-I), range of motion to dislocation (ROM-D) and peak resisting moment (PRM) were determined. Computer simulation was used to evaluate the range of motion of the hip joint at different prosthesis positions. Finite element analysis showed: (1) Increasing the ratio of head/neck increased the ROM-I values and moderately increased ROM-D and PRM values. Increasing the head size significantly increased PRM and to some extent ROM-I and ROM-D values, which suggested that there would be a greater likelihood of dislocation. (2) Increasing the anteversion angle increased the ROM-I, ROM-D, PRM, energy required for dislocation (ENERGY-D) and DRI values, which would increase the stability of the joint. (3) As the chamber angle was increased, ROM-I, ROM-D, PRM, Energy-D and DRI values were increased, resulting in improved joint stability. Chamber angles exceeding 55 degrees resulted in increases in ROM-I and ROM-D values, but decreases in PRM, Energy-D, and DRI values, which, in turn, increased the likelihood of dislocation. (4) The cup, which was reduced posteriorly, reduced ROM-I values (2.1 -- 5.3 degrees ) and increased the DRI value (0.073). This suggested that the posterior high side had the effect of 10 degrees anteversion angle. Increasing the head/neck ratio increases joint stability. Posterior high side reduced the range of motion of the joint but increased joint stability; Increasing the anteversion angle increases DRI values and thus improve joint stability; Increasing the chamber angle increases DRI values and improves joint stability. However, at angles exceeding 55 degrees , further increases in the chamber angle result in decreased DRI values and reduce the stability of the joint.

Fracture of the greater trochanter after hip replacement.

Fracture of the femur is one of the common complications of hip replacement surgery. Five percent of femur fractures involve just the greater trochanter. This series consisted of 21 women and nine men with fractures of just the greater trochanter after total or partial hip replacement. The fracture was displaced 2.5 cm or less in 90% of patients. Only three (10%) patients had an increase in the amount of displacement more than 2 months after the fracture was recognized. The direction of displacement was always medially and superiorly toward the femoral head, rather than directly superiorly as in an ununited trochanteric osteotomy. For 18 (60%) patients, the fracture was asymptomatic. For 12 patients, the fracture was painful or there was a significant limp. In six of the 12 patients, the pain and limp improved over several months. There were no dislocations or subluxations in this series. Three patients continued to have pain or limp but thought it was not severe and declined surgical repair and experienced progressive improvement. In three patients, the pain, a limp, or both persisted at 1 year and the displacement was 2 cm or more. These three patients underwent operative repair of the trochanter. Two patients experienced improvement after repair of the trochanter. The conclusion was that fractures of the greater trochanter generally are stable and usually do not require additional treatment.