Complications Of Central Venous Catheters Research Articles

Fatal Superior Vena Cava Obstruction With High-Output Chylothorax in a Preterm Infant: A Complication of Central Venous Catheterization

Fatal Superior Vena Cava Obstruction With High-Output Chylothorax in a Preterm Infant: A Complication of Central Venous Catheterization

Knowledge and Practices Regarding Prevention of Central Venous Catheter Removal-Associated Air Embolism: A Survey of Nonintensive Care Unit Medical and Nursing Staff.

Air embolism is a potentially serious complication of central venous catheter (CVC) use. While CVC insertion is usually performed by a trained specialist, extraction is frequently the responsibility of junior staff members. This complication can be easily prevented by following several simple measures described in common guidelines. We conducted a single-center survey to assess knowledge and practices concerning the prevention of air embolism associated with CVC removal among healthcare workers from nonintensive care units. The correct answers to the questionnaire were determined according to best-practice recommendations for CVC removal. Based on a comparison of the total sum of correct answers between the categories of groups, factors that predicted the level of knowledge were identified using an independent sample t test. Of the 156 respondents, one-third were unfamiliar with air embolism as a complication of CVC extraction. Almost 80% were unaware of the existence of a CVC removal protocol. Almost half of respondents did not follow guidelines regarding patient position when removing a CVC, 72% did not ask the patient to perform the Valsalva maneuver during the procedure, and 54% did not ask the patient to remain supine after the procedure. Adherence to the protocol was correlated with professional experience, with a lower level among those with experience of less than 1 year and, particularly, among interns. Our survey revealed inappropriately low awareness of CVC removal-associated air embolism risk and low familiarity with CVC removal best-practice recommendations among nonintensive care unit healthcare workers. Staff members with experience of less than 1 year, including interns, were found to have a lower level of knowledge. These findings emphasize the importance of development and distribution an internal hospital protocol and the integration of educational intervention into a preliminary internship program.

Central venous catheter-related infection: does insertion site still matter? A French multicentric cohort study.

We aim to evaluate the association between central venous catheter (CVC) insertion site and microbiological CVC complications in a nationwide cohort. This study was conducted using the healthcare-associated infection surveillance cohort "REA-REZO" involving 193 intensive care units (ICUs). All CVC inserted and removed during the same ICU stay between January 1st 2018 and December 31st 2022 were eligible but only those whose tips were sent for microbiological analysis were included. Primary objective was to describe CVC insertion sites and subsequent catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI). Out of 126,997 CVCs, 71,314 were not sent for tip culture, and only 55,663 CVCs were included, (30,548 in internal jugular [IJ], 14,423 in femoral and 10,692 in subclavian [SC] sites). The incidence of CRBSI was 0.7 [0.6-0.8] in the IJ site, 0.7 [0.6-0.9] in the femoral site, and 0.6 [0.4-0.7] CRBSI per 1000 CVC days in the SC site (p = 0.248). The multivariable Poisson regression model showed no differences of CRBSI incidence rates between the three insertion sites. Microorganisms observed in CRBSI were coagulase-negative Staphylococci (27.9%), Enterobacterales (27.5%), non-fermenting Gram-negative Bacilli (10.4%), Candida sp. (16.9%), and Staphylococcus aureus (16.9%). Low CRBSI incidence rates were reported. CRBSI incidences rates were similar in the three insertion sites. Uncertainty remains due to potential selection bias since many CVCs had to be excluded.

Comparing the Complications in Central Venous Catheterization by Ultrasound Guidance vs Anatomical Landmark Technique in Critical Ill ICU Patients

Objective: To compare the complication rates during central venous catheterization using ultrasound guidance versus the anatomical landmark technique in critical ill ICU patients. Methodology: A prospective comparative study was conducted in intensive care unit (ICU) of Farooq Teaching Hospital, Rawalpindi from December 2023 to June 2024. Total 127 critically ill ICU patients with acute surgical or medical conditions requiring central venous catheterization (CVC), such as hypotension, dehydration, or required blood resuscitation, where periphery approach was not feasible, underwent CVC insertion. Patients were randomly divided into two groups: one group underwent ultrasound-guided CVC insertion, while the other group used anatomical landmark technique. The rate of complications was measured between the groups. Results: Mean age of the patients was 46.5±11.2 years. The mean time from skin puncture to blood flashback was 104±172 sec in ultrasound group compared to 401±587 sec in landmark group. Among 127 patients, 61 underwent catheterization using ultrasound guidance, while 66 underwent catheterization using the anatomical landmark technique. The complication rates between the two groups were compared. The complications experienced by patients included multiple attempts (>1 puncture), pneumothorax, improper cannulation, hematoma, arterial punctures, incisional bleeding, and ecchymosis. In ultrasound group, 11.5% of patients experienced complications, compared to 28.8% in anatomical landmark group (p = 0.016). Conclusion: Ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization was associated with fewer complications and a higher success rate (correct placement of the CVC), making it easier to perform. This procedure simplicity is linked to enhanced safety and patient comfort.

Administration of 4% tetrasodium EDTA lock solution and central venous catheter complications in high-risk pediatric patients with intestinal failure: A retrospective cohort study.

Selection of central venous catheter (CVC) lock solution impacts catheter mechanical complications and central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) in pediatric patients with intestinal failure. Disadvantages of the current clinical standards, heparin and ethanol lock therapy (ELT), led to the discovery of new lock solutions. High-risk pediatric patients with intestinal failure who lost access to ELT during a recent shortage were offered enrollment in a compassionate use trial with 4% tetrasodium EDTA (T-EDTA), a lock solution with antimicrobial, antibiofilm, and antithrombotic properties. We performed a descriptive cohort study including 14 high-risk pediatric patients with intestinal failure receiving 4% T-EDTA as a daily catheter lock solution. CVC complications were documented (repairs, occlusions, replacements, and CLABSIs). Complication rates on 4% T-EDTA were compared with baseline rates, during which patients were receiving either heparin or ELT (designated as heparin/ELT). Patients initiated 4% T-EDTA at the time they were enrolled in the compassionate use protocol. Use of 4% T-EDTA resulted in a 50% reduction in CVC complications, compared with baseline rates on heparin/ELT (incidence rate ratio: 0.50; 95% CI, 0.25-1.004; P = 0.051). In a compassionate use protocol for high-risk pediatric patients with intestinal failure, the use of 4% T-EDTA reduced composite catheter complications, including those leading to emergency department visits, hospital admissions, additional procedures, and mortality. This outcome suggests 4% T-EDTA has benefits over currently available lock solutions.

Improved long-term outcome of children with congenital diarrhea followed by an intestinal rehabilitation program.

Long-term outcomes of congenital diarrheas and enteropathies (CODE) are poorly described. We evaluated the morbidity and mortality of children with CODE followed by an intestinal rehabilitation program (IRP) compared to children with short bowel syndrome (SBS). Matched case-control study of children with intestinal failure (IF) due to CODE (diagnosed between 2006 and 2020; N = 15) and SBS (N = 42), matched 1:3, based on age at diagnosis and duration of parenteral nutrition (PN). Nutritional status, growth, and IF-related complications were compared. Survival and enteral autonomy were compared to a nonmatched SBS cohort (N = 177). Fifteen CODE patients (five males, median age 3.2years) were followed for a median of 2.9years. Eleven children were alive at the end of the follow-up, and two achieved enteral autonomy. The CODE group had higher median PN fluid and calorie requirements than their matched SBS controls at the end of the follow-up (83 vs. 45 mL/kg/day, p = 0.01; 54 vs. 30.5 kcal/kg/day, p < 0.01), but had similar rates of growth parameters, intestinal failure associated liver disease, central venous catheter complications and nephrocalcinosis. Kaplan-Meier analyses of 10-year survival and enteral autonomy were significantly lower in CODE patients compared to the nonmatched SBS population (60% vs. 89% and 30% vs. 87%, respectively; log-rank p < 0.008). Despite higher PN needs in CODE, rates of IF complications were similar to matched children with SBS. Enteral autonomy and survival rates were lower in CODE patients. Treatment by IRP can mitigate IF-relatedcomplications and improve CODE patient's outcome.

Life on the line - Incidence and management of central venous catheter complications in intestinal failure

Background & AimsLoss of venous access is threatening for patients with intestinal failure (IF) under long-term parenteral nutrition (PN). We aimed to identify the incidence of central venous catheter (CVC) complications, compare different devices, and analyze interventional recanalizing procedures to restore the patency of occluded CVCs. MethodsFor this retrospective cohort study, patient data from a prospective IF database spanning 16 years was analyzed at a tertiary referral center. Catheter dwell times (CDT) were distinguished by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and subgroup analyses were performed for different CVC types (tunneled/ port catheters). Specific complications (occlusion, catheter-related infection (CRI), displacement, and material defect) were analyzed. Explantation rates and CDT were compared. ResultsOverall, 193 CVCs in 77 patients with IF under PN could be enrolled (62.524 “CVC-days”). Broviac type “B” was found to be significantly superior to type “A” regarding occlusion, CRI, and material defects (log-rank test: p=0.05; p=0.026; p=0.005 respectively). Port catheters were displaying the highest incidence of CRI (2.13 events/1000 catheter days). Interventional catheter recanalization was performed 91 times and significantly increased the CDT from a median of 131 days (IQR: 62; 258) to 388.5 days (IQR: 262; 731) (Mann-Whitney-U-test: p= <0.001) without increasing complications. ConclusionsDifferent complication rates and CDT were seen depending on CVC type. Tunneled catheters were significantly superior concerning CRI. Interventional catheter recanalization is a viable alternative to fibrinolytics to restore CVC patency, but long-term patency data is scarce.

Results of a long-term, prospective study on complications of central venous catheter in pediatric patients with hematologic-oncologic diseases.

Central venous catheter (CVC)-related complications remain a significant cause of morbidity in pediatric hematology-oncology. We prospectively surveyed the incidence of CVC-related complications in children with hematologic-oncologic diseases. Five-hundred-eighty-one CVCs were inserted in 421 patients from January 2010 to June 2022 (153,731 CVC days observation; follow-up data up to December 31, 2022). Overall, 671 complications were recorded (4.365/1000 CVC days): 49.7% malfunctions (1.88/1000 CVC days, 4.8% of CVC early removals), 23.9% bacteremia (0.90/1000, 15.1%), 19.6% mechanical complications (0.74/1000, 70.2%), 20.1% localized infections (0.76/1000, 17.1%), 0.5% thrombosis (0.02/1000, 33.3%). At multivariate analysis, risk factors for malfunction were Broviac-Hickman type of CVC (hazard ratio [HR] 2.5) or Port-a-cath (HR 3.4) or Proline (HR 4.3), p<.0001; for bacteremia double-lumen CVC (HR 3.2, p<.0001); for mechanical complications age at CVC insertion under median (HR 4.5, p<.0001) and Broviac-Hickman (HR 1.6) or Proline (HR 2.7), p=.01; finally for localized infections Broviac-Hickman (HR 2.9) or Proline (HR 4.4), p=.0001. The 2-year cumulative incidence of premature removal was 23.5%, and risk factors were age at CVC insertion under median (HR 2.4, p<.0001), Broviac-Hickman (HR 2.3) or Proline (HR 4.2), p<.0001. Premature removal occurs in approximately 20%-25% of long-term CVCs. A surveillance program has a fundamental role in identifying the risk factors for CVC complications and the areas of intervention to improve CVC management.

Outcomes for central venous catheter repair in patients receiving long-term home parenteral support: A descriptive cohort study.

Central venous catheter (CVC) complications are frequently reported in patients receiving home parenteral support (HPS). Compromised CVC integrity or breakage is one such issue. Repairing such breakages can potentially avoid costly and risky catheter replacements. We completed a retrospective descriptive cohort study using a prospectively maintained data set, in a national UK intestinal failure reference center. Repair success, CVC longevity, and catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI) rates after repair were the primary outcome measures. A total of 763 patients received HPS. There were 137 CVC repairs: 115 (84%) tunneled CVCs and 22 peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) attempted in 72 patients. Of the 137 attempts at CVC repair, 120 (88%) were deemed to be successful, allowing a median duration of subsequent CVC use of 336 days following repair (range 3-1696 days), which equates to 99,602 catheter days of HPS infusion. Three patients had a CRBSI within 90 days of repair, and patients required admission to the hospital for refeeding on 14 occasions following repair, such that hospitalization was avoided in 103/120 (86%) occasions following successful CVC repair. There was no increase in the recorded rate of CRBSIs in patients undergoing CVC repair compared with the CRBSI rates of all HPS-dependent patients under our care during the study period (0.03 vs 0.344/1000 catheter days, respectively). This is the largest single-center experience to demonstrate that CVCs, including PICCs, used for the administration of HPS can be safely repaired, prolonging CVC longevity without leading to an increased risk of CRBSI.

A 4-year tunneled hemodialysis catheter malpositioned into the azygos vein and how to remedy the hemodialysis circuit.

Mispositioning in the azygos vein is a rare but hazardous complication of central venous catheterization. A patient was admitted for a dysfunctional hemodialysis tunneled cuffed catheter (TCC) placed in the azygos vein for 4 years. Computed tomography angiography revealed multiple sites of occlusion, including the superior vena cava (SVC), right and left innominate veins (IVs), and right femoral vein. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and a TCC replacement based on a segment-by-segment recanalizing strategy were performed. First, an 8-Fr sheath was inserted through the left femoral vein approach to retrogradely traverse the occlusive SVC followed by a guidewire extending to the occlusive left IV. A left transjugular 15-cm snare was inserted to capture the transfemoral guidewire and achieve recanalization from the left IV to the SVC. Second, a transjugular guidewire was advanced through the dysfunctional TCC yet shunted into the left IV due to the inability to cross the SVC. A left transfemoral 15-cm snare was inserted to capture the guidewire and achieve complete recanalization from the right internal jugular vein to the SVC. Balloons were passed over the guidewires to dilate the obstructive lesions sequentially, and a new TCC was inserted successfully with the tip positioned in the right atrium.

Central Venous Catheter Complications in the Poisoning Emergency Center: A 5-Year Cross-Sectional Study.

Central venous catheters (CVCs) are used widely in emergency centers, which may be associated with complications. There is a paucity of literature focusing on CVC complications, specifically in the poisoning emergency centers. In this study, we determined the frequency of CVC complications in patients with acute poisoning. This was a cross-sectional study performed in the poisoning referral center. We reviewed the medical records of patients with acute poisoning who underwent CVC at the time of admission/during hospitalization in the poisoning intensive care unit or poisoning ward and were hospitalized between 2014 and 2019. During the study period, 33, l37 patients with acute poisoning had been admitted and CVC was placed for 400 patients (1.20% of total patients). Most of the CVCs had been placed via femoral (51%) (204 cases). The frequency of CVC complications was 13.75%. The CVC in the internal jugular (IJ) vein was associated with a higher complication (20.7%) (P value 0.02). Infection (9.2%) and pneumothorax (9.2%) were more observed with the IJ approach, while arterial puncture was more observed with subclavian (3.7%) (P value < 0.0001). The frequency of CVC placement in acute poisoning patients was not noticeable. Although the femoral vein was the most commonly used approach in our institution, overall complications were more observed with the IJ vein approach.

Predictors of central line-associated bloodstream infections in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy through implanted venous access ports: a retrospective, observational study.

Central venous catheters (CVCs) are sometimes superior to peripheral vascular access for chemotherapy. Central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) are an important complication of CVCs in chemotherapy. A retrospective, observational study was conducted to investigate patients with implanted venous access ports (PORTs) from July 2010 to June 2021 in a teaching hospital. General conditions of the PORTs, backgrounds, and characteristics of patients were compared between CLABSI cases and uninfected cases to identify predictors of CLABSI. A total of 566 patients with PORTs who underwent chemotherapy were enrolled in this study, with CLABSI identified in 41 patients, for a total of 436,597 catheter-days. The median duration of PORT use was 26 vs. 494 days (P<0.001) in the CLABSI and uninfected groups, respectively. There were no significant differences in tumor classification, staging, white blood cell (WBC) count, neutrophil proportion, lymphocyte proportion, albumin, C-reactive protein (CRP), and performance status between the CLABSI and uninfected groups. Multivariable analysis showed that antibiotic usage within the previous week, total protein (TP), and immediate PORT use were independently associated with CLABSI, and their odds ratios (ORs) were 4.89 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.67, 14.35], 1.95 (95% CI: 1.14, 3.53), and 3.13 (95% CI: 1.18, 8.30), respectively. The area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver-operating characteristic curve for TP was 0.63, and the cutoff value was 5.9 g/dL. PORT implantation should be avoided in patients who had antibiotic treatment episodes within 1 week, especially for those with low serum TP levels.

A Survey of Clinician Perspectives on the Management of Catheter-Related Upper Extremity Deep Vein Thrombosis in Patients with Cancer

Background: Central venous catheters (CVCs) are commonly used in cancer patients to facilitate blood draws, administration of chemotherapy or other supportive care treatment. Catheter-related upper extremity deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is a major complication of CVCs, with studies reporting a rate of symptomatic venous thromboembolism (VTE) of 7% over 3 months in patients with active cancer and a new CVC. Despite the frequent occurrence, the optimal management in patients with cancer and catheter-related upper extremity DVT is unclear, given the lack of high-quality data. Objective: We conducted a survey aiming to characterize practice patterns and perceptions of clinicians who treat patients with cancer and catheter-related upper extremity DVT. Methods: An online survey was distributed to international clinicians who manage patients with cancer and catheter-related upper extremity DVT. The survey explored the type and duration of anticoagulation, focusing on the management after the initial 3 months of anticoagulation, as well as treatment strategies upon catheter removal and interests in future clinical studies. Descriptive statistics was used to summarize survey responses. Results: The survey was generated on LimeSurvey ® in English and publicized by Twitter ® and email communications via multiple international organizations of hematologists, oncologists, and/or thrombosis specialists, including the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH), Thrombosis Canada, the Canadian Venous Thromboembolism Research Network (CanVECTOR), and more. As of July 30, 2023, 115 clinicians from 26 countries had completed the survey. The majority of the respondents specialized in thrombosis (N=72, 62.6%) and/or hematology (N=60, 52.2%), followed by internal medicine (N=38, 33.0%) and oncology (N=14, 12.2%) (multiple selection was permitted for this question). For the initial management of a patient without unresected gastrointestinal (GI) or genitourinary (GU) cancer, thrombocytopenia, or relevant drug-drug interactions, 75% of clinicians would prescribe a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) and 25% would give low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH). On the other hand, in patients with unresected GI/GU cancer, the majority (N=105, 91.3%) of respondents chose to initiate LMWH. After the initial 3 months of anticoagulation, if the CVC remains in place in a patient with active cancer, the majority (N=112/114, 98.2%) of clinicians would continue anticoagulation, but with variable doses (57% and 43% chose therapeutic and prophylactic dosing, respectively). If the CVC remains in place but the cancer is in remission, fewer (70%) respondents would continue anticoagulation, and more would continue prophylactic as compared to therapeutic dosing (73% vs. 27%) in this setting. Practice variation further increases upon catheter removal, especially in the presence of active cancer (Figures 1 and 2). The majority of respondents (N=111, 96.5%) agree that there is a need for prospective studies to evaluate the management of patients with cancer and catheter-related upper extremity DVT, and over 91% (N=105) would consider enrolling their patients in a study to evaluate prophylactic dosing of anticoagulation for secondary prevention of VTE in patients with cancer and catheter-related upper extremity DVT. To help plan such a study, we evaluated respondents' perception on the maximal “tolerable” recurrent VTE rate between 3 and 6 months (as the main interest is in the management strategy after the initial 3 months), and 2% and 3% were the most common responses (41.2% and 31.6% of the respondents, respectively). Conclusions: Our survey demonstrates that current practice in managing patients with cancer and catheter-related upper extremity DVT is heterogenous, especially after the initial 3 months of anticoagulation and upon catheter removal. Well-conducted prospective studies in this population are needed, which is supported by most clinicians.

Complications associated with central venous catheterization in pediatric ICU of a tertiary care hospital of Pakistan.

Objective: To determine the frequency of complications of central venous line insertion among children admitted in Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU). Study Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting: PICU of Shifa International Hospital, Islamabad, Pakistan. Period: March 2022 to February 2023. Material &amp; Methods: Children of either gender aged between 2 months to 16 years admitted in PICU during study period and underwent central venous catheterization(CVC) during admission were analysed. The patients were observed for immediate and late complications of CVC. Results: In a total of 160 children, 89 (55.6%) were boys. The mean age at the time of admission was 6.00±4.87 years. Immediate complications occurred among 9 (5.6%) children including catheter malposition, pneumothorax, hematoma, and arterial puncture observed in 4 (2.5%), 2 (1.3%), 2 (1.3%) and 1 (0.6%) children respectively. The CLABSI rate was 16.8 per 1,000 catheter days. The most common micro-organisms causing CLABSI were Methicillin Resistant Staph Epidermidis (MRSE), and Klebsiella, reported in 3 (21.4%) cases each. Younger age (p&lt;0.001), relatively low body weight (p&lt;0.001), and increased duration of central venous line placed (p&lt;0.001) were found to be significantly associated with CLABSI. Conclusion: In this study, CLABSI rate was found to be 16.8 per 1,000 catheter days which is comparable to the regional data. Common immediate complications of CVC were catheter malposition, pneumothorax, hematoma, and arterial puncture. Younger age and increased duration of CVC were associated with CLABSI.

Ultrasound-guided placement of Midline catheters performed by Neurosurgery resident as a substitute for conventional central venous catheter placement in Neurosurgical Intensive Care Unit patients

Background: Midline catheters (MCs) and peripherally inserted central venous catheters (PICCs) are placed by a specialist or trained nurse to avoid the complications of conventional central venous catheters (CCVCs). The safety of MC placements by residents has not been evaluated. We investigated the safety of ultrasound-guided MC placement by neurosurgery residents as a substitute for CCVC placement in patients in the neurosurgical intensive care unit (ICU) requiring intravenous (IV) therapy ≤14 days.Methods: Between July 2022 and June 2023, 57 MCs for 44 patients, 36 CCVCs for 35 patients, and 32 PICCs for 32 patients were placed during their ICU stay. One resident performed all MC placements under ultrasound guidance. The baseline and procedure-related parameters of the three catheter groups (MC, CCVC, and PICC) were analyzed, with focus on the comparison of complications between MC and CCVC.Results: The first-attempt success rate was significantly higher (p=0.003) in the MC group (96.5%) than in the CCVC group (80%). Insertional injuries occurred more frequently in the CCVC group than in the MC group (13.3% vs 0%, p=0.012). The rate of completion of therapy was significantly higher (p=0.002) in the MC group (86.0%) than in the CCVC group (53.3%). The incidence of bloodstream infections did not differ significantly between the MC and CCVC groups (p=0.605). Conclusion: MCs placed under ultrasound guidance by neurosurgery residents for neurosurgical ICU patients is safe and may be a substitute for CCVC indicated for IV therapy ≤14 days.

Central venous catheterization-related complications in a cohort of 100 hospitalized patients: An observational study

Objective: To evaluate the complications of central venous catheterization (CVC). Methods: A prospective, observational study was conducted at a tertiary care center in India from December 2018 to September 2020. Critically ill patients (aged ≥18 years) in the intensive care unit undergoing CVC procedures were included in the study. Baseline demographics and detailed medical history were recorded. Chest X-rays and electrocardiography were performed on all the patients. Complications associated with CVC were recorded. Results: A total of 100 patients with the indication for centralvenous catheter insertion were included. The majority (81%) of the patients were inserted with CVC at the right internal jugular vein. Complications such as arterial puncture (2%), hematoma (4%), blood clot formation (4%), catheter kinking (3%), thoracic injury(1%), thrombophlebitis (6%), sepsis (9%) and nerve injury (1%)were reported. Conclusions: Though central venous access is preferred in management of critically ill patients, it has its risks. However, early recognition and prompt management of complications may reduce mortality and morbidity. Physicians and intensive care unit intensivists should be vigilant for central venous catheter-related complications. Suitable site selection, operator experience, and proper catheter maintenance are associated with optimal outcomes.

Use of Basilic vein in arteriovenous fistulas construction for hemodialysis access. Is it a good option alternative to prosthetic arteriovenous grafts?

For patients with a failed forearm autogenous fistula (AF) and an exhausted cephalic vein, there is controversy about whether a brachial basilic AF with transposition or an arteriovenous prosthetic bridging graft (BG) must be the second vascular access option. This work measured and compared these two modalities according to patency rates, complications, and revisions. A retrospective study of 104 cases that had either a brachial basilic AF (72) or an Arteriovenous BG (32). Technical success, operative complications, procedurerelated mortality, maturation time, functional primary, secondary, and overall patency rates were all assessed. Technical success was obtained in all participants. No procedure-linked mortality. Maturation time for BGs was significantly shorter than AFs. The complication rate was significantly higher in BGs than in AFs. The most prevalent complication was access thrombosis. The functional primary patency rate was significantly higher in AF than in BG at 12-month followup: 77.7% vs 53.1% (p < 0.012). secondary patency rate was higher in AF than in BG at 1-year follow-up 62.5% vs 42.8% (p = 0.063), respectively. In addition, BGs required more interventions to preserve patency. AF had higher primary, secondary and overall functional patency rates and needed fewer procedures to keep patency than BGs. Cases that need early vascular access as a result of central venous catheter complications or who have a reduced life expectancy may benefit from BGs.

Central venous Catheters Indications and Complications: Review Article

Central venous Catheters Indications and Complications: Review Article

10: Incidence and management of mechanical and infectiologic complications of different central venous catheters in use for home parenteral nutrition

10: Incidence and management of mechanical and infectiologic complications of different central venous catheters in use for home parenteral nutrition

Case report: Central venous catheter thrombosis complicated by chronic thromboembolic disease/pulmonary hypertension in two children requiring parenteral nutrition

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension is a rare but life-threatening complication of long-term central venous catheters (CVC) in children. However, evidence in terms of potential treatment strategies and outcome data remains scarce. We describe two cases of CVC-related thrombosis (Hickman-catheter) complicated by recurrent pulmonary emboli. One patient experienced a complete thromboembolic obstruction of the right pulmonary artery with normal pulmonary pressures and the second patient suffered from a central thromboembolic obstruction of both pulmonary arteries associated with severe pulmonary hypertension. Both patients successfully underwent surgical thromboendarterectomy with deep hypothermic circulatory arrest.