Complex Spine Surgery Research Articles

A safe, novel and ingenious method for autogenous bone graft storage in spine surgery with constrained resources - operative site as the bone bank.

The aim of our study is to establish whether the bone graft harvested and stored in the surgical wound by our novel technique is safe, reproducible and preserves the viability of the graft. In doing so, it promises successful bony fusion in spine and orthopaedic surgeries. A prospective clinical case series was conducted for autogenous bone graft storage in complex spine surgeries requiring staged procedures, in resource constrained settings. The bone graft harvested was morselized, wrapped in moist sterile gauze and stored in the paraspinal gutter within the operative site. Thereafter, the surgical wound was easily closed without tension. During the second stage surgery, the stored bone was retrieved and mixed with more autologous/allogenic bone (if necessary) and appropriately laid at fusion sites. Bacterial samples were sent before implantation. 16 complex spinal deformity patients who underwent surgery in a resource constrained hospital over a period of 5 years were included. Duration between both stages was within 2 weeks. All patients showed successful fusion, with mean follow-up of 2.6 years. There were no cases of deep or systemic infection in our series. Surgeons found harvesting, storing and retrieval of graft to be straightforward. The operative site provides an ideal, safe and reproducible location for bone graft storage for staged surgeries conducted in resource constrained situations. The osteogenic potential of the autogenous bone graft is retained. This technique can be extrapolated to other orthopaedic surgeries conducted under resource limited environments like in surgical camps or combat medical facilities.

Development of the scoliosis research society spinal deformity surgery safety checklist.

Spine deformity surgery is a complex multi-step procedure that has a relatively high complication rate. The use of surgical safety checklists has been shown to reduce perioperative adverse events, but existing lists are varied and non-specific for spinal deformity surgery. Thus, the purpose of this study was to develop a comprehensive surgical checklist for complex spinal corrective surgery. An electronic survey consisting of 187 surgical checklist items that had been developed and used by a group of SRS members over a 5-year period was distributed to the Scoliosis Research Society Safety and Value Committee membership. The survey sections included: (1) pre-operative area, (2) initial operating room visit, (3) before turning, (4) positioning, (5) prepare and drape, (6) pre-incision timeout, (7) intraoperative, (8) finishing implant placement and confirming imaging, (9) final rods and locking, (10) prior to closure, (11) closure, (12) turn to supine, and (13) checkout/debriefing. Respondents graded each item on a five-point Likert scale based on their perceived importance and feasibility for inclusion in the checklist. Features graded as "moderately important" or "very important" to include by at least 70% of respondents were considered to meet the cutoff for inclusion-based standard Delphi practices. Study data were collated using REDCap. A total of 25 surgeons completed the survey in its entirety. The overall checklist "package" was shortened to 9 individual checklist modules, with 2 to 16 items per checklist. In terms of individual checklist items, 40% of items (74 of 187) met the cutoff for inclusion; 17 of these items were graded as "very important," which included verifying the presence of implantable devices, reviewing the surgical plan and positioning with the surgical staff, securing the endotracheal tube, bite block confirmation, prone and lateral positioning, neuromonitoring baseline readings, double-checking that the implant screw caps were locked prior to closure, and confirming that the patient was moving bilateral lower extremities before leaving the operating room when possible. This study has led to the development of a specific spinal deformity surgical checklist of 74 (many specific to spine surgery) items that were considered important for inclusion; 17 were considered "very important".

54. Potential benefit of staging surgery for complex spinal surgery: taking advantage of the opportunity to change the operative plan between stages

54. Potential benefit of staging surgery for complex spinal surgery: taking advantage of the opportunity to change the operative plan between stages

Surgical Treatment Strategies for Severe and Neglected Spinal Deformities in Children and Adolescents without the Use of Radical Three-Column Osteotomies.

Background: Severe spinal deformity manifests as a pronounced deviation from the normal curvature of the spine in the frontal, sagittal, and horizontal planes, where the coronal plane curvature exceeds 90 degrees and may coincide with hyperkyphotic deformity. The most severe deformities exhibit rigidity, with flexibility below 30%. If left untreated or improperly treated, these deformities can result in serious complications associated with progression of the curvature. A combination of surgical techniques is frequently employed to attain optimal outcomes and minimize the risk of complications. The overall medical condition of the patient, their capacity to endure extensive procedures, the expertise of the surgeon, and the resources available all play significant roles in determining the course of management. A systematic and thorough review of the relevant literature was conducted utilizing a variety of electronic databases. The primary objective of this study was to scrutinize the surgical techniques commonly employed in complex spine surgeries for the management of severe scoliosis without resection vertebral body techniques, with higher potential risk of major complications, including permanent neurological deficit. Conclusions: Halo-gravity traction, halo femoral traction, and all techniques for releases of the spine (anterior, posterior, or combine), as well as thoracoplasty, have demonstrated significant effectiveness in managing severe and rigid idiopathic scoliosis. The combination of several of these methods can lead to optimal alignment correction without the need to perform high-risk techniques involving three-column osteotomies. Surgeons must customize the indications based on factors such as available resources, characteristics of the deformity, and the patient's individual profile. Surgical correction of severe scoliosis without vertebral body resection surgeries decreases the potential risks related to neurological and pulmonary complications while providing significant clinical improvement outcomes. The powerful Ponte osteotomy is indicated for severe scoliosis, curves with poor flexibility, for better restoration of hypokyphosis, and decrease of hyperkyphosis. These corrective techniques combined with HGT or temporary internal distraction rods are recommended as viable options for managing individuals with severe rigid spine deformity characteristics. Therefore, they also should be considered and performed by a proficient surgical team. The presence of neuromonitoring is crucial throughout these procedures.

Brief history and application prospect of robotic spine surgery

Spinal robotics has rounded out twenty years in clinical, is mainly used for pedicle screw placement at present, can significantly increase the accuracy of screw placement and reduce radiation exposure to the patient and the surgeon. In the future, haptic feedback, automatic collision avoidance, and other technologies will further expand its application to complete precise operations such as decompression and correction, providing safety guarantee for the implementation of complex spinal surgery.

Perioperative Benefits of a 3D Printed Spine Biomodel in the Setting of Congenital Scoliosis Surgery

The spine community is continuously adding to its armamentarium of intraoperative techniques for visualization and instrumentation of the spine. Recently, three-dimensional printed spine models were introduced for use in preoperative planning, surgical simulation, and intraoperative guidance. We present a 14-year old African male with congenital kyphoscoliosis, small stature, an obvious gibbus deformity and coronal imbalance, who underwent a three-staged posterior surgical correction procedure, during which a 3D-printed spine biomodel was utilized for better appreciation of his complex spinal deformity patho-anatomy. During the first stage of the procedure, he developed diminished lower extremity motor strength bilaterally and bowel/bladder control, but, following his third stage procedure and with focused rehabilitation efforts, he has regained full control of his bowel and bladder function, and is able to ambulate and perform activities of daily living independently, albeit still requiring intermittent walking support with a single forearm crutch due to residual left leg weakness. The 3D spine biomodel functioned successfully as a valuable tool and surrogate anatomic blueprint for the surgeons, enabling adequate appreciation of the complex bony anatomy which could not be easily resolved on the conventionally available imaging modalities, intraoperative navigation or robotic platform. Theoretically, up to $2900 USD in savings, translated from the mean estimated time saved per procedure with the use 3D-printed spine models has been proposed in some studies. Therefore, 3D-printed spine models have utility in complex spinal deformity correction surgery.

What Are We Transfusing? Evaluating the Quality and Clinical Utility of Intraoperatively Salvaged Red Blood Cells in Spinal Deformity Surgery: A Nonrandomized Controlled Trial.

Intraoperative red blood cell (RBC) salvage is frequently used in contemporary spine surgery, despite clinical concern in its efficacy as a surrogate for blood-banked allogeneic packed RBCs (pRBCs). During spine surgery, salvaged RBCs (sRBCs) are exposed to injurious high-heat electrocautery, prolonged stasis, and abrasive pharmaceuticals, potentially making sRBCs a poor blood substitute. We therefore sought to scientifically and objectively define the quality of sRBCs in the context of complex spine surgery. This is a single-center, prospective, nonrandomized controlled trial of patients undergoing posterior-based multilevel thoracolumbar instrumented fusion for spinal deformity with planned use of intraoperative RBC salvage between June 2022 and July 2023. Surgeries were performed by fellowship-trained spinal neurosurgeons and orthopedic surgeons. The participants were split based on transfusion of sRBCs (given sufficient yield) vs no sRBC transfusion. Primary outcomes were RBC electrolyte composition, indices, deformability, and integrity, which were evaluated in comparison blood samples: Baseline, pRBC, and sRBC. Secondary outcomes were related to clinical effects of sRBC transfusion. Morphological assessment used Stimulated Raman Histology and machine learning. Deformability was assessed using ektacytometry. A total of 174 patients were included. The mean age was 50.2years ±25.4, 58.6% was female, the mean level fused was 10.0 ± 3.9, and 58.0% received sRBCs (median 207.0 mL). sRBCs differed significantly on standard laboratory measures, had a high proportion (30.7%) of shrunken and irregularly spiculated morphologies, and demonstrated abnormal deformability and relaxation kinetics. The hemolysis index was significantly elevated in sRBCs (2.9 ± 1.8) compared with Baseline samples and pRBCs (P < .01). Transfusion of sRBCs was associated with suboptimal resuscitation and provided no practical clinical benefit. RBCs salvaged during posterior thoracolumbar spine surgery are irreversibly injured, with hemolysis index exceeding Food and Drug Administration and Council of Europe transfusion standards in all samples, questioning their efficacy and safety as a blood substitute.

ANALYSIS OF TRANEXAMIC ACID USAGE IN ADULT SPINAL DEFORMITY PATIENTS WITH RELATIVE CONTRAINDICATIONS IN PAKISTAN

Patients who require complex spinal surgery require a huge amount of blood transfusion perioperatively. The anemia, the formation of hematoma, and increased coagulation properties, which are consequences of massive blood loss itself can negatively affect the postoperative clinical results.Objectives: The main objective of the study is to find the tranexamic acid usage in adult spinal deformity patients with relative contraindications in Pakistan. Methodology of the study: This prospective observational study was conducted at Pakistan institute of medical sciences from 2016-2020. Data were collected from 185 patients of spine deformity.Data were collected through a combination of medical record reviews and direct patient interviews. Demographic details, including age, gender, weight, and height, were recorded for each of the 185 patients. Comprehensive medical histories were obtained to identify comorbid conditions and relative contraindications for tranexamic acid (TXA) use, such as a history of thromboembolic events, renal impairment, and concurrent anticoagulant therapy. Results: Data were collected from 185 patients according to criteria of the study. Mean age of the patients were 58.4 ± 12.3 years. Out of 185, there were 112 (60.5%) females and 73 (39.5%) male patients. Mean BMI was 28.1 ± 5.4 kg/m2. 49.7% were also suffering from hypertension, 24.3% from DM and 20% from osteoporosis.The regression coefficient (β) for total blood loss was -250 mL, with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of [-300, -200], and a p-value of &lt; 0.001. Similarly, the regression coefficient for the number of blood transfusions was -1.2 units, with a 95% confidence interval of [-1.5, -0.9], and a p-value of &lt; 0.001.Conclusion: Tranexamic acid effectively reduces blood loss and transfusion requirements in adult spinal deformity surgeries, even among patients with relative contraindications. The associated complication rates are manageable with careful patient selection and monitoring.

Evaluation of ERAS protocol implementation on complex spine surgery complications and length of stay: a single institution study

BACKGROUND CONTEXTWith the goal of improving patient outcomes, the Integrated Spine Center at UT Southwestern Medical Center implemented an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol which includes pre- and postsurgery guidelines. Numerous studies have shown benefit of implementation of ERAS protocols to standardize perioperative care in line with best practices; however, the literature on complication rates, LOS, and readmissions shows mixed results. PURPOSEThe goal of this study was to investigate the impact of the ERAS protocol implementation on complication rates in the perioperative period, as well as hospital and ICU length of stay and hospital re-admission rates. STUDY DESIGN/SETTINGA retrospective cohort study was performed on all patients who underwent spine surgery between September 2016 and September 2021 at a single institution. Patients who met inclusion criteria were divided into non-ERAS and ERAS groups, and comparative statistics were used to evaluate ERAS protocol effectiveness. PATIENT SAMPLEAll patients who underwent spine surgery at UT Southwestern between September 2016 and September 2021 were evaluated for inclusion in the study. The patient sample was further refined to include only complex patient cases which were able to receive the full ERAS protocol (nonemergent admissions). OUTCOME MEASURESPresence of absence of postoperative complications including surgical site infection, AKI, DVT, MI, sepsis, pneumonia, PE, stroke, shock, and other complications were compared between groups, as were hospital and ICU length of stay, and 7, 30, and 90 day readmissions. Self-reported or functional measures were not used in outcome evaluation. METHODSA database of patient and surgery characteristics was built using an EMR query tool with spot checks performed by the authors. Control and treatment groups were matched for gender, age, BMI, ASA score, and surgery type. Total number of complication rates was compared between ERAS and non-ERAS groups, and comparative statistics were used to determine significance. RESULTSSignificant differences between ERAS versus non-ERAS groups were found in rates of UTI (6.8% vs 3.1%, respectively; p=.031), constipation (20.6% vs 11.4%, respectively; p=.001), and any complications (31.4% vs 19.4%, respectively; p<.001). There was no significant difference in the rates of other complications, in length of hospital or ICU stay, or readmissions at 7, 30, and 90 days. CONCLUSIONSImplementation of the ERAS protocol did not decrease complication rates or length of stay, and ERAS patients had significantly higher rates of UTI, constipation, and any complications. There may have been confounding factors due to the impact of COVID-19 on delivery of care, as well as misalignment between ERAS goals and outcome measures.

The impact of erector spinae plane (ESP) block on neurophysiological monitoring in patients undergoing scoliosis repair

ABSTRACT Background Preventive analgesia is designed to ensure perioperative pain control. The erector spinae plane (ESP) block may abolish the neuroendocrine stress response and augments controlled hypotensive anesthesia. But to what extent does it interfere with spinal cord function. Methods The patient’s population is divided into Group N (control) and Group E (ESP Group). A baseline for the amplitude and/or latency of either somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) or motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were collected (30 min after induction of anesthesia and after full reverse of muscle relaxant before performing ESP block) in group E, the change from the baseline was recorded as a percent decrease. The total dose of anesthetics, the adjuvant analgesics and the postoperative complications were recorded. Results The change in the latency and the amplitude of SSEPs and MEPs among the two groups showed a non-significant change from the baseline. The intra-operative fentanyl consumption was significantly lower in group E than in C. The mean was 21.5 ± 25 vs 178.2 ± 46 mg respectively. The total doses of propofol and dexmedetomidine were lower in group E than in C. 18% of the patients in group E requested a rescue analgesic at a median of 70 (65) min postoperatively vs 55% of those in group C that requested analgesics earlier at a median 16(6) min. Conclusion The ESP block can be safely used without interfering with the monitoring of the somatosensory and MEPs during complex spinal surgery.

Perioperative Methadone for Spine Surgery: A Scoping Review.

Complex spine surgery is associated with significant acute postoperative pain. Methadone possesses pharmacological properties that make it an attractive analgesic modality for major surgeries. This scoping review aimed to summarize the evidence for the perioperative use of methadone in adults undergoing complex spine surgery. The review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). A search was performed using MEDLINE, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Embase, and Joanna Briggs between January 1946 and April 2023. The initial search identified 317 citations, of which 12 met the criteria for inclusion in the review. There was significant heterogeneity in the doses, routes of administration, and timing of perioperative methadone administration in the included studies. On the basis of the available literature, methadone has been associated with reduced postoperative pain scores and reduced postoperative opioid consumption. Though safety concerns have been raised by observational studies, these have not been confirmed by prospective randomized studies. Further research is required to explore optimal methadone dosing regimens, the potential synergistic relationships between methadone and other pharmacological adjuncts, as well as the potential long-term antinociceptive benefits of perioperative methadone administration.

475 Molybdenum-Rhenium Rods in Complex Adult Spine Surgery Without Rod Fractures: A Multicenter Retrospective Case Series

INTRODUCTION: In complex spine surgery, current pedicle screw systems with 5.5 mm titanium, cobalt chromium or stainless steel rods have rod failure rates of approximately 9% with a minimum of 1-year follow-up. The fracture rate with these alloys increases to approximately 22% in PSO cases.1 Molybdenum-rhenium has demonstrated superior yield strength and fatigue endurance limit compared to Ti-6Al-4V and CoCr. METHODS: Retrospective, multicenter, case series. Inclusion criteria were = 4 levels posterior instrumented fusion with 4.5 mm molybdenum-rhenium rods, age = 18 yrs and 6 months or longer radiographic and followup. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty-nine (159) consecutive patients from ten different medical centers that had spinal surgery from August 2019 until April 2022 met inclusion criteria. Mean age was 63 ± 11.8 years; 50% women; 31% smokers; 19% diabetic and the mean BMI was 30 ± 7.3. The mean number of levels fused was 5.9 ± 2.7; 22.6% 4 levels, 64.2% 5-9 levels and 13.2% 10 levels or greater. Approximately half were thoracolumbar (27.7%) or thoracolumbar to pelvis (24.5%) and approximately half were lumbar-sacral (47.2%). Thirty-eight patients (24%) had a PSO and 59 patients (39%) had a SPO. All cases were done with molybdenum-rhenium 4.5 mm diameter rods. There were no RFs reported in the 159 cases (0/159; 0.0%) at 22.36 months mean follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: There was no incidence of RF in the 159 consecutive patients who underwent complex spine surgery involving multiple levels and osteotomies. A pedicle screw system based upon molybdenum-rhenium 4.5 mm rods provides superior fracture resistance particularly in complex spine procedures. 1 Smith JS, et al., Prospective multicenter assessment of risk factors for rod fracture following surgery for adult spinal deformity. J Neurosurg Spine. 2014 Dec; 21(6): 994-1003.

Barriers to overlapping complex and general spine surgery at a tertiary academic hospital.

Policy concern and debate surround the concept of overlapping spine surgery. Overlapping surgery specifically refers to nonessential portions of the case or noncutting time overlap. This differs from concurrent surgery, in which critical portions of the procedure overlap. Here the authors explore the barriers for safe and efficient overlapping surgery in academic spinal deformity practice. Over a 24-month period, cases of spinal deformity, degenerative cases, anterior cervical discectomy and fusions (ACDFs), and laminectomy were reviewed for duration in operating room (OR) prior to surgery, duration of cutting time, duration in OR after surgery, turnover duration, and time delay from initial start time. Standard degenerative cases were referenced as 1-2 ACDFs as well as 1- to 2-level laminectomy surgery. The blocks of time between two consecutive cutting periods were investigated to determine the feasibility of overlapping an additional surgery. Specifically, the authors compared the blocks of time that include the postsurgery period, the turnover period, and the presurgery period to cutting periods. One hundred twenty-six complex spinal deformity procedures and 85 degenerative cases (including 49 ACDFs and 36 laminectomies) from one center and one neurosurgeon were reviewed. These procedures were performed between September 2019 and December 2021 with a 3-month gap in military deployment. On average, the procedure's duration for cases of deformity was 236.5 minutes, for cases of ACDFs it was 84 minutes, and for cases of laminectomies it was 105.5 minutes. The block of noncutting time while the patient was in the OR showed no difference from the surgical cut time. The turnover time between cases was 52.35 minutes. Of 100 cases scheduled as the first case of the day, 94 had a delay to the OR averaging 18.2 minutes. The data in this study indicate that estimates for pre- and postsurgical times alone are not sufficient to allow for overlapping surgery. The average cut-time duration of ACDF was 84 minutes; the average presurgical time for deformity was 68 minutes. This highlights the critical analysis for further examination of optimal scheduling, on-time first start, turnover periods, and the orchestration of all members of the providing team to optimize the cutting time for safe and consistent implementation of overlapping spine surgery.

Paraspinous Muscle Flaps in Complex Pediatric Spine Surgeries: A 12-Year Single Institution Experience.

The benefits of paraspinous flaps in adult complex spine surgery patients are established in the literature; however, their use in pediatric patients has not been well described. This study compares clinical outcomes with and without paraspinous muscle flap closure in pediatric patients who have undergone spine surgery. We conducted a retrospective review of all pediatric spine surgeries at the University of California, San Francisco from 2011 to 2022. Patients were divided into 2 cohorts based on whether the plastic surgery service closed or did not close the wound with paraspinous muscle flaps. We matched patients by age, American Society of Anesthesiology classification, prior spinal surgical history, and diagnosis. Surgical outcomes were compared between the 2 cohorts. We identified 226 pediatric patients who underwent at least one spinal surgery, 14 of whom received paraspinous flap closure by plastic surgery. They were matched in a 1:4 ratio with controls (n = 56) that did not have plastic surgery closure. The most common indication for plastic surgery involvement was perceived complexity of disease by the spine surgeon with concern for inadequate healthy tissue coverage (78.6%), followed by infection (21.4%). Postoperative complications were similar between the two groups. The plastic surgery cohort had a higher rate of patients who were underweight (57.1% vs 14.3%, P < 0.01) and had positive preoperative wound cultures (28.6% vs 8.9%, P = 0.05), as well as a higher rate of postoperative antibiotic usage (78.6 vs 17.9%, P < 0.01). There was no difference in recorded postoperative outcomes. Spine surgeons requested paraspinous flap closure for patients with more complex disease, preoperative infections, history of chemotherapy, or if they were underweight. Patients with paraspinous flap coverage did not have increased postoperative complications despite their elevated risk profile. Our findings suggest that paraspinous muscle flaps should be considered in high-risk pediatric patients who undergo spine surgery.

Multimodality Imaging for 3D Printing and Surgical Rehearsal in Complex Spine Surgery.

Surgery is the mainstay treatment of symptomatic spinal tumors. It aids in restoring functionality, managing pain and tumor growth, and improving overall quality of life. Over the past decade, advancements in medical imaging techniques combined with the use of three-dimensional (3D) printing technology have enabled improvements in the surgical management of spine tumors by significantly increasing the precision, accuracy, and safety of the surgical procedures. For complex spine surgical cases, the use of multimodality imaging is necessary to fully visualize the extent of disease, including both soft-tissue and bone involvement. Integrating the information provided by these examinations in a cohesive manner to facilitate surgical planning can be challenging, particularly when multiple surgical specialties work in concert. The digital 3-dimensional (3D) model or 3D rendering and the 3D printed model created from imaging examinations such as CT and MRI not only facilitate surgical planning but also allow the placement of virtual and physical surgical or osteotomy planes, further enhancing surgical planning and rehearsal. The authors provide practical information about the 3D printing workflow, from image acquisition to postprocessing of a 3D printed model, as well as optimal material selection and incorporation of quality management systems, to help surgeons utilize 3D printing for surgical planning. The authors also highlight the process of surgical rehearsal, how to prescribe digital osteotomy planes, and integration with intraoperative surgical navigation systems through a case-based discussion. ©RSNA, 2024 Test Your Knowledge questions for this article are available in the supplemental material.

Analysis of tranexamic acid usage in adult spinal deformity patients with relative contraindications: does it increase the risk of complications?

Complex spinal deformity surgeries may involve significant blood loss. The use of antifibrinolytic agents such as tranexamic acid (TXA) has been proven to reduce perioperative blood loss. However, for patients with a history of thromboembolic events, there is concern of increased risk when TXA is used during these surgeries. This study aimed to assess whether TXA use in patients undergoing complex spinal deformity correction surgeries increases the risk of thromboembolic complications based on preexisting thromboembolic risk factors. Data were analyzed for adult patients who received TXA during surgical correction for spinal deformity at 21 North American centers between August 2018 and October 2022. Patients with preexisting thromboembolic events and other risk factors (history of deep venous thrombosis [DVT], pulmonary embolism [PE], myocardial infarction [MI], stroke, peripheral vascular disease, or cancer) were identified. Thromboembolic complication rates were assessed during the postoperative 90 days. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to assess thromboembolic outcomes in high-risk and low-risk patients who received intravenous TXA. Among 411 consecutive patients who underwent complex spinal deformity surgery and received TXA intraoperatively, 130 (31.6%) were considered high-risk patients. There was no significant difference in thromboembolic complications between patients with and those without preexisting thromboembolic risk factors in univariate analysis (high-risk group vs low-risk group: 8.5% vs 2.8%, p = 0.45). Specifically, there were no significant differences between groups regarding the 90-day postoperative rates of DVT (high-risk group vs low-risk group: 1.5% vs 1.4%, p = 0.98), PE (2.3% vs 1.8%, p = 0.71), acute MI (1.5% vs 0%, p = 0.19), or stroke (0.8% vs 1.1%, p > 0.99). On multivariate analysis, high-risk status was not a significant independent predictor for any of the thromboembolic complications. Administration of intravenous TXA during the correction procedure did not change rates of thromboembolic events, acute MI, or stroke in this cohort of adult spinal deformity surgery patients.

Patient-specific automated cerebrospinal fluid pressure control to augment spinal wound closure: a case series using the LiquoGuard®

Objective Spinal cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks are common, and their management is heterogeneous. For high-flow leaks, numerous studies advocate for primary dural repair and CSF diversion. The LiquoGuard7® allows automated and precise pressure and volume control, and calculation of patient-specific CSF production rate (prCSF), which is hypothesized to be increased in the context of durotomies and CSF leaks. Methods This single-centre illustrative case series included patients undergoing complex spinal surgery where: 1) a high flow intra-operative and/or post-operative CSF leak was expected and 2) lumbar CSF drainage was performed using a LiquoGuard7®. CSF diversion was tailored to prCSF for each patient, combined with layered spinal wound closure. Results Three patients were included, with a variety of pathologies: T7/T8 disc prolapse, T8-T9 meningioma, and T4-T5 metastatic spinal cord compression. The first two patients underwent CSF diversion to prevent post-op CSF leak, whilst the third required this in response to post-op CSF leak. CSF hyperproduction was evident in all cases (mean >/=140ml/hr). With patient-specific CSF diversion regimes, no cases required further intervention for CSF fistulae repair (including for pleural CSF effusion), wound breakdown or infection. Conclusions Patient-specific cerebrospinal fluid drainage may be a useful tool in the management of high-flow intra-operative and post-operative CSF leaks during complex spinal surgery. These systems may reduce post-operative CSF leakage from the wound or into adjacent body cavities. Further larger studies are needed to evaluate the comparative benefits and cost-effectiveness of this approach.

Postoperative urinary retention (POUR) in the setting of complex spine surgery - A risk factor analysis

Postoperative urinary retention (POUR) in the setting of complex spine surgery - A risk factor analysis

Learning effectiveness of clinical anatomy and practical spine surgery skills using a new VR-based training platform

IntroductionAs medical education becomes more complex, the demand for advanced teaching and training methods has grown. Technological advancements have opened up new possibilities, particularly in the realm of virtual reality (VR) simulations for training. Research QuestionOur prospective, randomized pilot study aims to assess whether a novel VR-based 3D training platform can effectively teach the knowledge and skills needed for complex spinal surgery, specifically pedicle screw placement. Material and MethodsWe enrolled 25 participants who received either a traditional lecture (control group, n=11) or a VR lecture with identical content featuring 3D/VR anatomical models (VR group, n=14). The VR group also underwent VR simulation for pedicle screw placement. We evaluated their learning through a quiz, a practical skills test, and selfassessment questionnaires. ResultsIn the theory multiple-choice test, the contral group scored an average of 69% (range 53-87%, SD 0.10), while the VR group scored 66% (range 47-87%, SD 0.11) (p=0.692, independent sample t-test).For the practical DOPS test (pedicle screw placement), the average score was 2.4 points (n=25; range 1-4). The VR group on average scored 2.9 points compared to the control (2 points) (p=0.134). Discussion and Conclusion Our study indicates that teaching with a new 3D VR training tool yields results comparable to traditional methods in terms of knowledge retention. This research supports the platform's effectiveness as an educational resource. Importantly, trainees can apply VR-acquired knowledge to real surgical procedures, which are well-received.

Cost-effectiveness of a second opinion program on spine surgeries: an economic analysis

BackgroundIn this study we proposed a new strategy to measure cost-effectiveness of second opinion program on spine surgery, using as measure of effectiveness the minimal important change (MIC) in the quality of life reported by patients, including the satisfaction questionnaire regarding the treatment and direct medical costs.MethodsRetrospective analysis of patients with prior indication for spine surgery included in a second opinion program during May 2011 to May 2019. Treatment costs and outcomes were compared considering each patients’ recommended treatment before and after the second opinion. Costs were measured under the perspective of the hospital, including hospital stay, surgical room, physician and staff fees and other costs related to hospitalization when surgery was performed and physiotherapy or injection costs when a conservative treatment was recommended. Reoperation costs were also included. For comparison analysis, we used data based on our clinical practice, using data from patients who underwent the same type of surgical procedure as recommended by the first referral. The measure of effectiveness was the percentage of patients who achieved the MIC in quality of life measured by the EQ-5D-3 L 2 years after starting treatment. An incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated.ResultsBased upon the assessment of 1,088 patients that completed the entire second opinion process, conservative management was recommended for 662 (60.8%) patients; 49 (4.5%) were recommended to injection and 377 (34.7%) to surgery. Complex spine surgery, as arthrodesis, was recommended by second opinion in only 3.7% of cases. The program resulted in financial savings of -$6,705 per patient associated with appropriate treatment indication, with an incremental effectiveness of 0.077 patients achieving MIC when compared to the first referral, resulting in an ICER of $-87,066 per additional patient achieving the MIC, ranging between $-273,016 and $-41,832.ConclusionAfter 2 years of treatment, the second opinion program demonstrated the potential for cost-offsets associated with improved quality of life.