Complex Elbow Injuries Research Articles

Uncementing the status quo: systematic review of a loose-fit, polished stem radial head prosthesis shows stable clinical results in complex elbow injuries with a concomitant radial head fracture.

Selecting the optimal radial head prosthesis to treat radial head fractures, especially in the context of complex elbow injuries like terrible triad, Monteggia, and Essex Lopresti, can be challenging, as there is currently no consensus in the field that favors a particular design. This study investigated the safety and performance of a Polished Stem Radial Head Prosthesis (PS RHP) compared to other modern RHP designs. A systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines to capture data on a Polished Stem Radial Head Prosthesis (PS RHP) and other Radial Head Prostheses (RHPs). Functional scores, range of motion, complications, and revisions were extracted from published literature and analyzed in parallel with the percentage of complex injuries. Comparison of functional outcomes between groups were based on minimum clinically important differences (MCIDs). There were 16 articles reporting on 711 cases of the PS RHP and 23 articles reporting on 605 cases of other RHPs included in the systematic literature review. Functional scores and range of motion were similar amongst the groups. The PS RHP design achieved a comparable revision rate as other RHPs despite a higher number of terrible triad injuries. Notably, the PS RHP group showed a significantly lower rate of instability (1.0%) than other RHPs (3.4%) (p < 0.05). Other complication rates were similar amongst the two groups. The PS RHP group had higher rates of terrible triads at baseline compared to the other RHPs group. Regardless of greater injury complexity, the clinical outcomes of the PS RHP group were favorable and resulted in a significantly lower rate of postoperative instability as compared to other RHPs.

Three-dimensional quantitative study and functional outcome analysis of coronoid fracture in different elbow injury patterns

BackgroundCoronoid fractures are often part of a complex fracture-dislocation of the elbow. For an optimum prognosis, it is important to understand the characteristics of coronoid fractures in different elbow injury patterns. Significant differences in these characteristics have been observed in various studies, but these previous studies have suffered from limitations, such as insufficient quantification and unknown prognostic differences among different injury patterns. Therefore, we aimed to quantitatively analyze coronoid fracture characteristics and functional outcomes in different elbow injury patterns using 3D-CT. MethodsAll patients with coronoid fractures surgically treated at our hospital between January and December 2017 were categorized into three groups according to elbow injury pattern: PLRI, VPMRI and OFD. 3D models were reconstructed using Mimics 17.0, and the total volume (TV) and number of coronoid fragments (NCF) were measured. The coronoid process edge was classified into different anatomical regions, and each region was assigned a number to quantify the distribution of fracture lines. At the last follow-up, the ROM, VAS, MEPS, complications and reoperations were recorded. ResultsThe ninety-two patients enrolled had an average age of 42±15 years and a male-to-female ratio of 66:26. The median TV in PLRI patients was less than that in VPMRI patients [431 (132, 818)mm3 vs. 1125 (746,1421)mm3,adjusted P<0.001] and OFD patients [431 (132, 818) mm3 vs. 2565 (381, 4076)mm3, adjusted P =0.001]. The median NCF in PLRI patients was also less than that in VPMRI patients [1 (1, 2) vs. 2 (1, 3), adjusted P=0.043]. Most of the PCFL-Rs (79%) were located around the volar edge of the lesser sigmoid notch. Compared with that of PLRI, the PCFL-Us of the VPMRI and OFD tended to be located on the more ulnodorsal side of the coronoid process edge. The median ROM [110 (90, 133), P=0.001] and the median MEPS [85 (68, 95), P=0.038] of patients with OFD were significantly less than those of patients with the other two patterns. The incidence of elbow stiffness (56%, 5/9, P=0.001) and implant-related irritation (44%, 4/9, P<0.001) in the OFD group was significantly higher than that in the other two groups. ConclusionCoronoid fractures differ significantly in fragment volume, comminution severity and fracture line distribution among different elbow injury patterns. OFD has the worst functional outcomes among complex elbow injury patterns.

Bridge plating is an effective adjunct treatment for complex elbow instability

Managing persistent elbow instability and chronic dislocations presents challenges despite traditional treatments. Supplementary methods like immobilization and various fixations, though common, can carry high complication rates. This study assesses the efficacy of bridge plating in treating complex elbow instability through a retrospective review of patients. Data on characteristics, treatment duration, range of motion, complications, and evaluation scores were analyzed, providing insights into outcomes complications associated with bridge plating. Eleven patients were reviewed at a mean follow-up of 80±68 weeks postoperatively. The mean age was 53±14 years and there were 5 females and 6 males. The mean body mass index was 38. Bridge plating was used for a spectrum of complex elbow injuries. The mean time from injury to bridge plating in acute cases was 29±19 days and 344±381 days in chronic cases. The mean duration of bridge plating was 121±72 days. At the time of plate removal, mean intraoperative elbow motion was extension 58°±12°, flexion 107°±14°, supination 66°±23° and pronation 60°±26°. At the latest follow-up visit, mean elbow motion was extension 37°±22°, flexion 127°±17°, supination 72°±15°, and pronation 63°±18°. There were 6 complications (55%): heterotopic ossification, ulnar neuropathy, wound failure over the plate in a thin patient, an ulnar shaft periprosthetic fracture due to a seizure-induced fall, and persistent elbow subluxation despite bridge plate fixation. Finally, 1 patient sustained a fracture of a 3.5-mm locking bridge plate. One patient required a contracture release for persistent stiffness. Four of these complications can be directly attributed to the use of the bridge plate (36%). At final follow-up, the mean patient-rated elbow evaluation score was 34, with 0 indicating no pain and disability. The mean Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation score was 66% for the 8 patients who had this available, with 100% being the best possible attainable score. Bridge plating effectively maintains joint reduction in selected complex elbow instability cases. However, patients with bridge plates often require a second surgery for removal and experience high rates of general complications because of the complexity of their condition.

Elbow dislocation approach for complex elbow fractures: a cadaveric study

BackgroundApproach need to be considered when surgeons dealt with complex elbow injuries and the choice of the approach is a challenge for surgeons due to the complex anatomy. On the basis of releasing the lateral collateral ligament, we modified the dislocation technique to pursue the superior exposure including not only the distal humeral surface but also the anterior facet of the coronoid process.MethodsA total of 4 cadaver specimens and 8 elbows were included in the study. Each cadaver provided one elbow for either the elbow dislocation approach or the posterior olecranon approach. The exposed distal articular surface of humerus, humeral capitulum, humeral trochlea, anterior trochlea of distal humerus, posterior trochlea of distal humerus and the ulnar coronoid process surface were marked by image J software and calculated for a comparison for each surgical approach.ResultsThe total distal humeral surface was exposed as a median of 98.2 (97.6, 99.6)% and 62.0 (58.3, 64.5)% for the elbow dislocation approach and the olecranon osteotomy approach (P < 0.001), the capitulum 100% and 32.4 (28.0, 39.2)% (P < 0.001), the trochlea 93.2(90.1, 96.9)% and 72.5 (65.2, 78.8)% (P < 0.001), the anterior trochlear articular surface 96.0(93.0, 97.4)% and 50.3 (43.6, 59.1)% (P < 0.001), the posterior trochlear articular surface 95.4 (93, 100)% and 100% (P = 0.76) and the articular surface of the coronoid process of ulna 71.3 (66.0, 74.2)% and 0% (P < 0.001).ConclusionFor complex elbow fractures, the technique of elbow dislocation provides complete exposure of the distal humerus surface and a significant portion of the coronoid process surface, facilitating direct visualization for reduction and fixation.Level of evidence Anatomy Study; Cadaver Dissection.

The Boyd approach: a valuable alternative to treating simple to complex elbow fractures and dislocations.

The Boyd approach is a single-incision posterior approach to the proximal radius and ulna based on a lateral anconeus muscle reflection and release of the lateral collateral ligamentous complex. This approach remains a lesser-used technique following early reports of proximal radioulnar synostosis and postoperative elbow instability. Although limited by small case series, recent literature does not support these early reported complications. This study presents a single surgeon's outcomes using the Boyd approach for the treatment of simple to complex elbow injuries. Following institutional review board approval, a retrospective review of all patients with simple to complex elbow injuries treated consecutively using a Boyd approach by a shoulder and elbow surgeon was conducted from 2016 to 2020. All patients with at least 1 postoperative clinic visit were included. Data collected included patient demographics, injury description, postoperative complications, elbow range of motion, and radiographic findings including heterotopic ossification and proximal radioulnar synostosis. Categorical and continuous variables were reported using descriptive statistics. A total of 44 patients were included with an average age of 49 years (range 13-82 years). The most commonly treated injuries were Monteggia fracture-dislocations (32%) and terrible triad injuries (18%). Average follow-up was 8 months (range 1-24 months). Final average elbow active arc of motion was from 20° (range 0°-70°) of extension to 124° (range 75°-150°) of flexion. Final supination and pronation were 53° (range 0°-80°) and 66° (range 0°-90°), respectively. There were no cases of proximal radioulnar synostosis. Heterotopic ossification contributing to less than functional elbow range of motion occurred in 2 (5%) patients who elected conservative management. There was 1 (2%) case of early postoperative posterolateral instability due to repair failure of injured ligaments that required revision using a ligament augmentation procedure. Five (11%) patients experienced postoperative neuropathy, including 4 (9%) with ulnar neuropathy. Of these, 1 underwent ulnar nerve transposition, 2 were improving, and 1 had persistent symptoms at final follow-up. This is the largest case series available demonstrating the safe utilization of the Boyd approach for the treatment of simple to complex elbow injuries. Postoperative complications including synostosis and elbow instability may not be as common as previously understood.

Midterm outcomes of a short-cemented bipolar radial head arthroplasty, in a cohort of 56 cases with minimum 2-years follow-up

BackgroundRadial head prostheses are used in comminuted radial head fractures for elbow stabilisation when reduction and internal fixation is not possible. Several implant designs exist, but no large series exist about a short-cemented and bipolar implant. HypothesisThe hypothesis was that this prosthesis design shows good clinical, functional, and radiological results, with acceptable rate of complications. Study designThis retrospective study included the prostheses with bipolar design and short-cemented stem (Evolutive™), with a minimum 2-years follow-up. Materials and methodsAll prosthesis implanted in our Traumatology Center were included, with minimum 2-years follow-up. The evaluation consisted of a clinical and functional evaluation, associated with an independent radiographic assessment. All complications were listed, as long as rate and reasons for implant removal. ResultsFifty-six implants were studied with a mean follow-up of 64.9months (24 to 119). Fifty-three cases were acute injuries with 16% isolated radial head fractures and 76% complex elbow injury such as ulno-humeral, radio-ulnar or longitudinal forearm instability. Fifty (89%) implants were still in place at last follow-up. The main reason for implant removal was during arthrolysis procedure. Ranges of motion were: 126° in flexion, 9° of extension loss, 76° of pronation and 79° of supination. Mean Mayo Elbow Performance Index was 84.1 with 72% of excellent or good results, and the median quick-DASH was rated 18.2. Radiographic evaluation found 12% significant ulno-humeral arthtitis, 64% capitellar osteopenia and 12% loosening. We recorded 5% of implant-related complications. DiscussionThe short-cemented stem bipolar radial head prosthesis presents clinical and functional results similar to other radial head prosthesis with low incidence of elbow arthritis, when treating both isolated radial head fracture or complexes elbow injury. This implant should therefore be valid for treating comminuted radial head fractures in all types of traumatological injuries. Level of evidenceIV; Retrospective cohort study.

Primary Hinged External Fixator for Complex Fracture Dislocations of the Elbow (Systematic Review/Meta-Analysis)

Background High-energy and fracture dislocations with compromise of the medial and lateral ligamentous complex, the joint capsule, and potentially the tertiary stabilizers (i.e., the flexor pronator, extensor supinator masses, and brachialis) often demonstrate residual instability after osseous and ligamentous stabilization. The optimal management of a complex elbow injury should results in restoring joint stability and its full range of motion. However, this is often difficult to achieve by surgical means and a marked restriction of movement remains a frequent con- sequence of severe elbow injury. Aim of the Study The aim of this study is to discuss the results of using a lateral hinged external fixator as an adjunct stabilizer in the treatment of a variety of acute destabilizing elbow injuries as a primary method of fixation not only in chronic or complicated cases. Patients and Methods Types of studies: Randomized controlled trials, including cluster RCTs, controlled (non-randomized) clinical trials or cluster trials, prospective and retrospective comparative cohort studies, and case-control or nested case-control studies. Types of participants: Only studies on human subjects with acute complex elbow fracture dislocation treated by hinged elbow external fixator. Types of interventions: Surgical treatment of acute complex elbow fracture dislocation with hinged external fixation of elbow. Types of outcome measures: Operative details, intra and postoperative complications and final clinical outcome. Literature searches will be conducted using the following databases:” PubMed, Ovid, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, Medline” using the following Keywords: acute complex elbow fracture dislocation, hinged external fixator, unstable elbow, terrible triad and long term for published studies from 2010-2021. Results Regarding studies done on the use of a lateral hinged external fixator on the elbow for complex fracture dislocation which are numerous in the last 11 years, we have reviewed the most applicable studies in our review. Regarding the mean flexion-extension arc and pronation-supination arc, the results were 121.5 º and 81 º respectively. Regarding the complications, wound infection was found in 10 patients out of 69 cases (14.4%) including pin tract infection and ORIF wound infection. Secondary humeral and ulnar shaft fractures were found in 3 patients out of 69 cases (4.3%) as a recognized complication of the shanz screws application in both humerus and ulna. Another complication founded was elbow joint incongruity in 5 patients among 69 cases (7.2%) which leads to series consequences like arthritis, progressive pain and instability. Instability as a postoperative complication was found in 1 patient out of 69 cases (1.4%) which shows the huge effect of adding a hinged external fixator to the ORIF construct. In fact, this was the only reason to add a hinged external fixator in the past where it was used in cases of recurrent and chronic instability. Non union was found in 2 patients out of 69 patients (2.8%) while heterotrophic calcification was found in 8 patients out of 69 cases (11.5%). Iordens et al in 2015 was the only paper to calculate the quick-dash score where among 27 patients the score were 30 at 6 weeks and 7 at 1 year. Regarding the mayo elbow performance score (MEPS), among the 69 patients 21 patients (30.4%) were not affiliated while the score was poor in 1 patient (1.4%), fair in 7 patients (10.1%), good in 18 patients (26%) and excellent in 22 patients (31.8%) which shows that above 50% of cases where good to excellent showing the effect of early protected range of motion gained by the addition of a hinged external fixator. Conclusion The best management for complex elbow fracture dislocations is still controversy but the additional use of a hinged external fixator to the ORIF repair shows better outcomes as described.

Outcomes of the Posterior Approach for the Treatment of Radial Head Fractures and Associated Elbow Injuries: A Retrospective Observational Study.

The lateral approach to the radial head remains the routinely used approach for surgical fixation or replacement despite the risk of injury to lateral soft tissue structures. Multiple approaches are required when dealing with complex elbow injuries involving other bony and soft tissue structures which lead to greater soft tissue dissection, prolonged immobilization, and a higher rate of elbow stiffness. This article utilizesa single posterior approach involving the Boyd interval in the surgical management of radial head fractures with an associated elbow injury. Thirteen patients with radial head fractures and related elbow injuries treated with the posterior approach to the elbow were retrospectively analyzed. All patients were operated on by a single surgeon and followed up for a minimum of 18 months postoperatively. Functional evaluation of the patients was performed at the final follow-up which comprised a range of movements of the elbow, visual analogue scale (VAS), Disability of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH), and the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS). The mean VAS score was 2.16, QuickDASH score, and Mayo elbow score were 7.15 ± 2.96 and 78.46 ± 8.26 respectively. The flexion-extension arc of the elbow was 128.46 ± 4.27 degrees and the supination-pronation arc was 133.92 ± 4.04 degrees at one-year follow-up. Two patients developed early postoperative complications (elbow stiffness and ulnar nerve neuropraxia) and recovered spontaneously. No patients developed neuropraxia of the posterior interosseous nerve (PIN). The single incision posterior (Boyd) approach to the elbow offers complete access to the radial head, olecranon, coronoid, and lateral ligamentous structures in complex elbow injuries and provides good functional outcomes in our small observational study.

Mid-term functional outcome assessment of early surgical intervention in complex elbow fracture dislocation in adults

Aim: The aim of the present study was to study mid-term functional outcome assessment of early surgical intervention in complex elbow fracture dislocation in adults.Methods: The study was conducted in the Department of Orthopaedics, trauma centre, Institute of Medical Science, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, after getting clearance from the ethics committee. Patients with a complex elbow injury (instability or dislocation associated with fracture), age 18 years to 60 years, who were treated surgically between May 2016 and May 2021, who agreed to participate in the study and signed the free and informed consent with a minimum follow-up of 6 months.Results: 34 cases made up the study group. There were 23 male and 11 female patients, aged between 18 years and 60 years, who were followed up for an average of 38.56 months (range 6 months to 5 years) and were clinically and radiologically, retro prospectively, and prospectively evaluated. The dominant side was involved in 24 patients and the non-dominant in the other 10 patients. According to Mason's classification, 44.1% were type 3 followed by type 2 (32.4%) and type 1 (14.7%). According to Regan- Moore's classification, 23.5% were in type 1 and 3. Mean flexion-extension arc and mean supination-pronation arc in excised were 115.63 degrees and 101.25 degrees in radical group and mean flexion-extension arc and mean supination-pronation arc in excised were 132.75 degrees and 121.2 degrees in coronoid group. Mean flexion-extension arc and mean supination-pronation arc in 26-35 age group were 116.5 degrees and 97.5 degrees and mean flexion-extension arc and mean supination-pronation arc in dominant were 120.42 degrees and 107.92 degrees in coronoid group. There were no malunion, infection, ulnar neuropathy and neural deficit were observed. Mild pain was present in 47.1% cases.Conclusion: Although our number of patients and mean duration of follow-up are less than many other studies, we have achieved comparable results in view of both subjective and objective parameters of follow-up such as the mean arc of flexion-extension, supination-pronation, mean Q-DASH score, MEPI score.

Case report: Case of complex elbow injury in young lady

The radial head plays a critical role in the stability of the elbow joint and its range of motion. Injuries may occur across a spectrum of severity, ranging from low energy non-displaced fractures to high energy comminuted fractures. Multiple classification systems exist to help characterize radial head fractures and their associated injuries, as well as to guide treatment strategies. Depending on the type of fracture, non-operative management may be possible along with early range of motion is initiated. Other options include open reduction and internal fixation or excision followed by arthroplasty. A lateral approach is typically used for adequate surgical exposure. Controversy still remains regarding operative management of more severe fractures, but studies have shown good outcomes after radial head replacement for these fractures. We will review the current treatments available for radial head fractures, highlighting gaps in knowledge, as well as providing recommendations for the care of these injuries.

Long-Term Outcomes of Radial Head Arthroplasty in Complex Elbow Fracture Dislocation.

The purpose of the current study was to investigate the long-term outcomes of radial head arthroplasty in complex elbow injuries through radiographic analysis and functional correlation. We evaluated 24 radial head arthroplasties in 24 consecutive patients with complex elbow fracture dislocation. All patients were treated with a single type of modular monopolar prosthesis containing smooth stem in press-fit implantation. Clinical survey using the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), self-reported scales of shortened Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) and the visual analog scale (VAS) at more than 10-year follow-up were reported and compared to 2-year outcomes. Periprosthetic osteolysis was measured in the 10 zones of prosthesis-cortical interface with a modified radiolucency score, which was calibrated by each prosthesis size. Pearson correlation analysis was performed to detect the association between periprosthetic radiolucency and clinical assessment. At the final follow-up, MEPS, QuickDASH score and VAS score averaged 82.5 ± 15, 14.1 ± 14.3 and 1.6 ± 1.2 respectively. A decline in functional status was noted, with decreased mean MEPS and increased mean QuickDASH and VAS scores as compared to the 2-year results while the difference was insignificant. Periprosthetic osteolysis was more prevalent around stem tip of zone 3 and zone 8. The final and 2-year radiolucency scores averaged 7.4 ± 4.2 and 2.6 ± 2.3 respectively with significant difference. Pearson correlation analysis indicated that the difference between radiolucency scores and clinical outcomes in MEPS/QuickDASH/VAS was −0.836, 0.517 and 0.464. Progression of periprosthetic osteolysis after postoperative 10 years is more prevalent around the stem tip with moderate to high correlation to clinical outcomes. Sustained follow-up is warranted to justify subsequent surgery for revision or implant removal.

A Peculiar Case of Open Complex Elbow Injury with Critical Bone Loss, Triceps Reinsertion, and Scar Tissue might Provide for Elbow Stability?

BackgroundComplex elbow injuries (CEIs) are severe and rare lesions, difficult to treat correctly due to the different patterns of clinical presentations. Standard methods cannot often be applied. The main goals of the treatment are performing a stable osteosynthesis of all fractures, obtaining a concentric and stable reduction of the elbow by repairing the soft tissue constraint lesions, and allowing early motion. Since the introduction of virtual reality (VR) approaches in clinical practice, three-dimensional (3D) computed tomography (CT) and 3D printing have revolutionised orthopaedic surgeries, thus helping to understand the anatomy and the pathology of complex cases.Case descriptionWe discussed a case of CEI, characterised by an extended soft tissue (IIIB Gustilo classification) and neurovascular lesions associated with bone loss in a young female patient. Olecranon fracture was type IIIB according to Mayo classification. We outlined the steps of a pluri-tissue reconstructive approach and stressed the importance of 3D printing in the preoperative planning for such cases. Finally, peculiar final functional patient outcomes were reported.ConclusionIn this case, we found out that triceps reinsertion and scar process may provide for the joint stability in a low-demanding patient. 3D printing and VR approaches in clinical practice can be useful in the management of CEIs associated with an important bone and soft tissue loss.How to cite this articleFacco G, Politano R, Marchesini A, et al. A Peculiar Case of Open Complex Elbow Injury with Critical Bone Loss, Triceps Reinsertion, and Scar Tissue might Provide for Elbow Stability? Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2021;16(1):53–59.

Sideswipe Injury to the Leg – A Hefty Price for an Autorickshaw Ride: A Case Report

Introduction: Sideswipe injury is often described as a complex elbow injury occurring when the elbow rests on a side bar of the window of a vehicle and is then impacted by another vehicle travelling in the same or opposite direction. Side swipe injury to the leg is uncommon. Although the term side swipe is mostly used for elbow injuries, we came across a case of open comminuted fibular fracture of right leg resulting from side swipe while travelling in a tricycle. Case Presentation: A 27-year-old male presented to us after sustaining an injury to his right leg while he was travelling in a tricycle with his right leg protruding out. There was an open wound of size 20 cm x 10 cm on lateral aspect of the middle one-third of his right leg and x-rays revealed a comminuted fracture of mid shaft of fibula. He was managed with debridement, vacuum assisted closure (VAC) dressing, split thickness skin grafting and plaster immobilization. At one year follow-up, the patient had excellent function in the leg with no activity limitation and just a minor loss of power in eversion. Conclusion: Sideswipe injury of the leg is an infrequently reported entity and can occur if the leg is protruding out while riding in a tricycle (autorickshaw). Keywords: Leg, Sideswipe injury, Tricycle related injury.

Complex elbow injuries

: Operative treatment for complex elbow injuries has evolved. The elbow is prone to stiffness, as such operative stabilization of complex injuries is imperative to allow for early mobilization. The four injuries that will be discussed include Monteggia fracture-dislocation, distal humerus fracture, terrible triad, and transolecranon fracture. A case presentation with surgical technique is presented for each. Surgical management of these injuries is then discussed by combining current literature and author experience.

Prolonged dislocation and delay to surgery are associated with higher rates of heterotopic ossification in operatively treated terrible triad injuries

BackgroundHeterotopic ossification (HO) formation after complex elbow injuries can significantly impact function. Prior studies have reported a 3%-45% incidence of HO following elbow trauma in a heterogeneous cohort of fracture patterns. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the prevalence of and identify risk factors for HO specifically in patients with terrible triad injuries. MethodsA total of 61 patients (64 elbows) underwent operative treatment for terrible triad injuries with an average follow-up period of 19.8 months (range, 3-138 months). The medical records were reviewed for demographic data, duration of dislocation, number of reduction attempts, time to surgery, presence of radiographic HO, elbow motion at final follow-up, functional limitations, and need for secondary procedures. ResultsRadiographic HO developed in 77% of patients, and 63% had some level of functional restriction. Thirteen patients (26%) underwent a secondary procedure for HO excision. Patients with HO had a longer time to surgery (4.9 days vs. 2.8 days, P = .02), longer duration of dislocation (21 hours vs. 6 hours, P = .04), and reduced flexion-extension (94° vs. 112°, P = .04) and pronation-supination (109° vs. 163°, P = .002) arcs of motion compared with patients without HO. HO was also more likely to develop in patients who required closed reduction than in those with spontaneous reduction prior to presentation. ConclusionThe prevalence of radiographic and clinically relevant HO after terrible triad injuries was higher than previously reported. Persistent dislocation necessitating a closed reduction, a longer duration of dislocation, and a delay to surgery were associated with the development of HO. Providers should consider earlier surgical stabilization or urgent referral to a specialist for patients with unstable injuries.

Risk Factors for the Development of Heterotopic Ossification in Operatively Treated Terrible Triad Injuries

Heterotopic ossification (HO) formation after complex elbow injuries can significantly impact function. Prior studies report a 2-56% incidence of HO following elbow trauma however these findings represent a heterogenous cohort of fracture patterns. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the prevalence of HO in patients with isolated terrible triad injuries and identify risk factors associated with the formation of HO. We hypothesized that prolonged dislocation, multiple reduction attempts, and delay in definitive surgical stabilization are associated with more significant radiographic and functionally limiting HO.

Monteggia-like lesions: preliminary reports and mid-term results of a single center.

Background and aim of the work:Monteggia-like lesions are complex and rare elbow injuries. A detailed classification and a proper surgical treatment can provide quite good functional and radiological outcomes. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the mid-term results of Monteggia-like lesions surgical treatment. The other purpose was to investigate whether the complexity of ulna and radius fractures could be prognostic factors of insufficient functional results.Methods:Seven women and five men, with a mean age of 59,25 years who had sustained a Monteggia-like lesion were followed up clinically and radiologically after surgical treatment. The Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) and the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QUICK-DASH) score were used for evaluation at a mean of 17,5 months postoperatively (12-26). The range of movement (ROM), patients’ satisfaction and neurological symptoms were also investigated. Osteolysis, implant loosening and heterotopic ossification were graded. Pearson’s test was used to correlate the different classification systems used (AO/OTA, Bado and Jupiter, PURCCS, Mason) with MEPS and QUICK-DASH score.Results:The mean MEPS was 84,92 (65 to 100). The mean QUICK-DASH score was 18,75 (0 to 34,1). The mean active pronation and supination was 72,5° and 59,17°, respectively. The mean active ROM of the elbow was 101,43°. Heterotopic ossifications were absent in six cases but were found in six. No statistically significant correlation was found between the analyzed variables.Conclusions:Quite good functional results can be obtained in Monteggia-like lesions if injury pattern is recognized and each component of the injury is addressed. Further studies are needed to determine any prognostic factors. (www.actabiomedica.it)

The management of a complex elbow injury with transaction of the brachial artery

&lt;p class="abstract"&gt;&lt;span lang="EN-IN"&gt;Elbow dislocations are commonly encountered cases by orthopaedic surgeon. Vascular injury accompanying an elbow dislocation is a surgical challenge. The authors report a rare complication of complete transaction of the brachial artery following a posterior dislocation of the elbow joint. A fifty-year old male suffered a road traffic accident during which he injured his left elbow. Radiographs confirmed a posterior dislocation of the elbow joint. However the radial and ulnar pulse very not palpable. Arterial doppler confirmed injury to brachial artery. The patient was successfully treated and regained full functional use of his left upper limb. The aim of this report is to help readers understand why a vascular injury occurs following an elbow dislocations. A successful management of such injuries revolves around a prompt clinical diagnosis and early repair.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

Radial Head Fractures.

Background:Radial head fractures are common elbow injuries in adults and are frequently associated with additional soft tissue and bone injuries.Methods:A literature search was performed and the authors’ personal experiences are reported.Results:Mason type I fractures are treated non-operatively with splinting and early mobilisation. The management of Mason type II injuries is less clear with evidence supporting both non-operative treatment and internal fixation. The degree of intra-articular displacement and angulation acceptable for non-operative management has yet to be conclusively defined. Similarly the treatment of type III and IV fractures remain controversial. Traditional radial head excision is associated with valgus instability and should be considered only for patients with low functional demands. Comparative studies have shown improved results from internal fixation over excision. Internal fixation should only be attempted when anatomic reduction and initiation of early motion can be achieved. Authors have reported that results from fixation are poorer and complication rates are higher if more than three fragments are present. Radial head arthroplasty aims to reconstruct the native head and is indicated when internal fixation is not feasible and in the presence of complex elbow injuries. Overstuffing of the radiocapitellar joint is a frequent technical fault and has significant adverse effects on elbow biomechanics. Modular design improves the surgeon’s ability to reconstruct the native joint. Two randomised controlled trials have shown improved clinical outcomes and lower complication rate following arthroplasty when compared to internal fixation.Conclusion:We have presented details regarding the treatment of various types of radial head fractures - further evidence, however, is still required to provide clarity over the role of these different management strategies.

Double-locking precontoured plating system for malunited fractures of the distal end of humerus.

Distal humeral malunions are uncommon injuries, often associated with limited elbow motion, pain, instability, weakness, and sometimes ulnar neuritis. The complex anatomy of the elbow joint makes this condition one of the most complex elbow injuries to treat. Four patients were treated by the same surgeon between 2011 and 2013 using a double-locking precontoured plating system for malunited intra-articular or extra-articular fractures of the distal end of the humerus. At a mean 3years of follow-up, a significant improvement in the elbow motion and functional outcome, evaluated with the Mayo Elbow Performance Index and the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand, were observed. Articular reduction obtained after the surgery was maintained in all patients without evidence of avascular necrosis. No other complications (i.e., infection, nervous iatrogenic lesions) were reported. Corrective osteotomy using double-locking precontoured plating system preceded by preoperative planning using a CT scan allowed an improvement in the functional outcome and elbow motion, without complications.