Completion Of Parenteral Therapy Research Articles

Improved Neurodevelopmental Outcomes following Long-Term High-Dose Oral Acyclovir Therapy in Infants with Central Nervous System and Disseminated Herpes Simplex Disease

Infants with neonatal herpes, classified as central nervous system or disseminated disease, have a high incidence of moderate and severe neurologic deficits despite standard acute therapy. Following completion of parenteral therapy, infants with central nervous system and/or disseminated disease received 2 years of continuous oral acyclovir therapy. Target minimum peak serum acyclovir concentrations were >2 microg/ml for the first three patients, and >3 microg/ml for the subsequent 13 patients. Safety assessments were made every 3 months. We evaluated neurodevelopmental outcomes with Bayley Scales of Infant Development. A total of 16 consecutive herpes simplex virus-infected infants born during 1990 to 2003 received the treatment plan; 13/16 infants had central nervous system disease; 3 had disseminated disease without central nervous system involvement. A total of 69% (11/16) had Bayley scores in the normal range for mental development and 79% (11/14) had motor scores in the normal range. At the final assessment, five children had developmental delays. One child had severe mental delay with normal motor development. Four children had mild mental delays, with severe motor delays in three. All children were independently mobile, without seizure disorder, had normal vision, and had speech development. During the 2-year course of treatment, five children had brief recurrences of dermal lesions, and none had evidence of neurologic deterioration. There were no serious or sustained adverse drug reactions. This pilot study reports improved outcomes in a small cohort of infants with a prolonged course of oral acyclovir. A minority of these children exhibited mild or significant developmental delays. Further investigation of this approach to treatment is warranted.

A prospective, randomized, double-blind multicenter comparison of parenteral ertapenem and ceftriaxone for the treatment of hospitalized adults with community-acquired pneumonia

Background: Ertapenem is a once-daily parenteral beta-lactam licensed in the United States in November 2001 and in Europe in May 2002. Objective: This study compared the efficacy and safety profiles of ertapenem with those of ceftriaxone for the treatment of hospitalized adult patients with serious community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) requiring parenteral therapy. Methods: In this prospective, double-blind (with sponsor blinding), multicenter study, adult patients with CAP were stratified by Pneumonia Severity Index (≤3 or >3) and age (≤65 or >65 years) and randomized (2:1) to receive IV or intramuscular (IM) ertapenem 1 g once daily or IV or IM ceftriaxone 1 g once daily. Investigators could switch patients to an oral antimicrobial agent if clinical improvement was shown after at least 3 days of parenteral therapy. Results: A total of 364 patients were randomized to treatment: 239 to the ertapenem group and 125 to the ceftriaxone group. Three patients in the ertapenem group and 2 in the ceftriaxone group did not receive study therapy. Of the treated patients, 77.1% (182/236) of patients in the ertapenem group and 75.6% (93/123) in the ceftriaxone group were clinically evaluable. Among clinically evaluable patients, the mean (SD) durations of parenteral and total (parenteral plus optional oral) therapy were 5.5 (2.6) and 11.5 (2.7) days for ertapenem and 5.6 (2.8) and 11.7 (3.0) days for ceftriaxone, respectively. Streptoccocus pneumoniae was the most frequently isolated pathogen in both treatment groups. Cure rates were 92.2% for clinically evaluable patients in the ertapenem group and 93.6% for those in the ceftriaxone group (95% CI for the difference, adjusted for stratum, −8.6 to 5.7), fulfilling the criteria for statistical equivalence. At completion of parenteral therapy, 94.7% of patients in the ertapenem group and 95.8% in the ceftriaxone group showed clinical improvement. Infused vein complications (ertapenem, 3.4% [8/236]; ceftriaxone, 7.3% [9/123]) and elevated transaminase levels (ertapenem, 6.3% [13/207]; ceftriaxone, 7.1% [8/113]) were the most common adverse events in both groups. Conclusions: In this study of hospitalized adult patients, ertapenem therapy, with an oral switch option, was as effective as ceftriaxone with the same oral switch option for treatment of CAP requiring initial parenteral therapy. The overall safety profiles of the 2 drugs were comparable.