Completion Of Neoadjuvant Therapy Research Articles

Circulating Neoplastic-Immune Hybrid Cells Are Biomarkers of Occult Metastasis and Treatment Response in Pancreatic Cancer.

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) presents significant diagnostic and prognostic challenges, as current biomarkers frequently fail to accurately stage disease, predict rapid metastatic recurrence (rPDAC), or assess response to neoadjuvant therapy (NAT). We investigated the potential for circulating neoplastic-immune hybrid cells (CHCs) as a non-invasive, multifunctional biomarker for PDAC. Peripheral blood specimens were obtained from patients diagnosed with PDAC. CHCs were detected by co-expression of pan-cytokeratin and CD45, normalized to 50,000 peripheral blood mononuclear cells. rPDAC was defined as metastatic recurrence within six months of margin-negative pancreatectomy. Cyclic immunofluorescence (CyCIF) analyses compared hybrid phenotypes in blood and tumors. Blood samples were collected from 42 patients with PDAC prior to resection. Those with radiographically occult metastatic disease and rPDAC had higher preoperative CHC numbers compared to patients who did not (65.0 and 74.4, vs. 11.52 CHCs; p < 0.001). Patients with complete or near-complete pathologic responses to NAT had lower preoperative CHC numbers than partial and/or non-responders (1.7 vs. 13.1 CHCs; p = 0.008). When assessed longitudinally, those with partial pathologic response saw CHC levels become undetectable while on treatment but increase in the interval between NAT completion and resection. In contrast, patients with poor responses or development of metastatic disease experienced persistent CHC detection during therapy or rising levels prior to radiographic evidence of metastases. Further, in metastatic PDAC patients, treatment-induced phenotypic changes in hybrid cells mirrored those in paired metastatic tumor samples. CHC enumeration and phenotyping display promise as a real-time indicator of disease burden, recurrence risk, and treatment response in PDAC. CHCs have great potential as tumor-derived biomarkers to optimize therapeutic strategies and improve survival in patients with PDAC.

Neoadjuvant camrelizumab followed by concurrent camrelizumab plus chemotherapy for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a single-arm, phase II study.

Neoadjuvant therapy combining camrelizumab with chemotherapy has emerged as a promising approach for treating locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). However, the optimal strategy for integrating immunotherapy with chemotherapy remains to be fully defined. This single-arm phase II study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant therapy with camrelizumab induction followed by camrelizumab plus chemotherapy in locally advanced ESCC. Patients with clinical stage cT2-4N0M0 or cTxN1-3M0 ESCC were enrolled in the study. Patients received one dose of camrelizumab (200 mg) followed by docetaxel (75 mg/m2) and nedaplatin (75 mg/m2) plus camrelizumab (200 mg) every 3 weeks for two cycles, and then underwent surgery within 3-4 weeks. The primary endpoint was the major pathological response (MPR) rate. The secondary endpoints included the pathological complete response (pCR) rate, R0 resection rate, downstaging rate, disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. In total, 55 patients were enrolled in the study between 16 April 2020 and 30 October 2021. Of these 55 patients, 53 (96.4%) completed neoadjuvant therapy, and 48 (87.3%) underwent surgery. The MPR rate was 77.1% [37/48, 95% confidence interval (CI): 62.7-88.0%]. The pCR (ypT0N0) rate was 39.6% (19/48, 95% CI: 25.8-54.7%). All the patients had R0 resections. Primary tumor downstaging occurred in 44 (91.7%) patients, and nodal downstaging occurred in 19 (39.6%) patients. The 2-year DFS rate was 68.9% (95% CI: 53.0-80.4%), and the 2-year OS rate was 74.7% (95% CI: 60.2-84.6%). Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were observed in 7 (12.7%) patients. In conclusion, neoadjuvant camrelizumab followed by camrelizumab plus chemotherapy showed promising efficacy in treating locally advanced ESCC and had a manageable safety profile.

The predicting value of post neoadjuvant treatment magnetic resonance imaging: a meta-analysis.

Neoadjuvant therapy has become standard of care for locally advanced rectal cancer patients. It is correlated with improved clinical and pathological outcomes, including significant tumor downstaging and organ preservation in certain patients. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which has become the standard for pre-operative staging, is also used for clinical and pre-operative restaging following pre-operative treatment. In this meta-analysis, we aimed to evaluate the concordance between restaging MRI (following the completion of neoadjuvant therapy) and postoperative pathology result. We conducted a meta-analysis following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Two independent reviewers searched PubMed and Google Scholar for studies reporting restaging MRI results compared to pathological outcomes. Outcomes included tumor and nodal staging, circumferential resection margin (CRM) and pathological complete response (pCR). Out of 25,000 studies found on the initial search; 33 studies were included. The studies were published between 2005 and 2023 and included 4100 patients (57.14% males). The median age was 62.45 years. The median interval between the conclusion of neoadjuvant treatment and the subsequent restaging MRI was 6 weeks (range 4.14-8.8 weeks). The pooled concordance rates between the restaging MRI and the pathological outcomes for ypT stage and ypN stage were 63.9% (54.5%-73.3%, I2 = 96.02%) and 60.9% (42.9%-78.9%, I2 = 98.96%), respectively. The pooled concordance for predicting pathological complete response was 70.4% (53.6%-87.1%, I2 = 98.21%). As for the circumferential resection margin (CRM), the pooled concordance was 78.2.% (71.6%-84.8%, I2 = 83.76%). Our findings suggest that the concordance rates between restaging MRI and pathological outcomes in rectal cancer patients following neoadjuvant therapy are limited. Caregivers should take these results into consideration when making clinical decisions about these patients. More data should be gathered about the predictive value of MRI after total neoadjuvant therapy as well as immunotherapy in rectal cancer patients.

Dose dense versus 3 weekly AC during neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy for triple negative breast cancer

Neoadjuvant pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy (P + CT) has emerged as a standard of care for stage II-III triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). However, the best anthracycline-cyclophosphamide (AC) schedule remains to be determined. While the KEYNOTE-522 regimen employs AC every 3 weeks (q3w AC), previous studies have shown overall survival benefits of dose-dense regimens for early-stage breast cancer. The Neo-Real study (GBECAM-0123) is a real-world data effort evaluating patients with TNBC treated with neoadjuvant P + CT in ten cancer centers since July 2020. The objective of this analysis was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of dose-dense AC (ddAC) versus q3w AC. Among 333 patients included until November 2023, 311 completed neoadjuvant therapy and 279 underwent surgery with pathology reports available; ddAC was used in 58.2% and q3w AC in 41.8% of the cases. Most patients (69.1%) had stage II TNBC. A pCR was observed in 65.4% with ddAC and 58.7% with q3w AC (P = 0.260), while RCB 0-1 occurred in 82.4% and 73.5%, respectively (P = 0.115). Patients with stage III disease had a numerically higher pCR with ddAC (59% vs 40%, P = 0.155), while pCR rates were similar regardless of AC regimen in stage II disease (66.6% vs 64.5%; P = 0.760). While no significant disparities in drug discontinuation was noted, ddAC showed a trend towards higher rates of grade ≥3 AE (40.5% vs. 30.7%, P = 0.092). The Neo-Real study could not rule out a difference between ddAC and q3w AC during neoadjuvant P + CT. The observation of a potentially higher pCR with ddAC in stage III disease warrants further investigation.

Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy was associated with better short-term survival of patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma compared to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

The chemotherapy and immunotherapy combination is currently the primary strategy to treat metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy (NCIT) is being intensively investigated for treating locally advanced ESCC. We compared the efficacy and safety of NCIT and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) to treat locally advanced ESCC. We included 214 locally advanced ESCC patients who were administered neoadjuvant therapy from May 2014 to April 2022. The patients were grouped according to two neoadjuvant protocols (NCIT and NCRT) routinely used at our institution. Perioperative findings, pathological results, and survival data were compared between the two groups by conducting unmatched and 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) analyses. Following 1:1 PSM analysis of the confounders, 66 patients were allocated to each of the two groups. Time span between neoadjuvant therapy completion and esophagectomy was significantly longer after NCRT than that after NCIT (47.1 ± 13.2 days vs. 34.7 ± 8.8 days; p < 0.001). The NCIT group exhibited significantly greater number of harvested lymph nodes than the NCRT group (33.6 ± 12.7 vs. 21.7 ± 10.2; p < 0.001). The pathological complete response and major pathological response rates were similar between the two groups [NCIT group: 25.8% (17/66) and 62.1% (41/66), respectively; NCRT group: 27.3% (18/66) and 56.1% (37/66), respectively (p > 0.05)]. The overall incidence of pneumonia, anastomotic leakage, or postoperative complications did not differ significantly between the two groups. The 2-year cumulative overall survival rates and the 2-year disease-free survival rates of the NCIT and NCRT groups were 80.2% and 62.2%, respectively (p = 0.029) and 70.0% and 50.8%, respectively (p = 0.023). In locally advanced ESCC patients, short-term survival after NCIT is superior to that after NCRT, with similar perioperative and pathological outcomes.

Treatment abandonment in children with Wilms tumor at a national referral hospital in Uganda

IntroductionThe incidence of pediatric Wilms’ tumor (WT) is high in Africa, though patients abandon treatment after initial diagnosis. We sought to identify factors associated with WT treatment abandonment in Uganda.MethodsA cohort study of patients < 18 years with WT in a Ugandan national referral hospital examined clinical and treatment outcomes data, comparing children whose families adhered to and abandoned treatment. Abandonment was defined as the inability to complete neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery for patients with unilateral WT and definitive chemotherapy for patients with bilateral WT. Patient factors were assessed via bivariate logistic regression.Results137 WT patients were included from 2012 to 2017. The mean age was 3.9 years, 71% (n = 98) were stage III or higher. After diagnosis, 86% (n = 118) started neoadjuvant chemotherapy, 59% (n = 82) completed neoadjuvant therapy, and 55% (n = 75) adhered to treatment through surgery. Treatment abandonment was associated with poor chemotherapy response (odds ratio [OR] 4.70, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.30–17.0) and tumor size > 25 cm (OR 2.67, 95% CI 1.05–6.81).ConclusionsChildren with WT in Uganda frequently abandon care during neoadjuvant therapy, particularly those with large tumors with poor response. Further investigation into the factors that influence treatment abandonment and a deeper understanding of tumor biology are needed to improve treatment adherence of children with WT in Uganda.

Discontinuation of neoadjuvant therapy does not influence postoperative short-term outcomes in elderly patients (≥ 70 years) with resectable gastric cancer: a population-based study from the dutch upper gastrointestinal cancer audit (DUCA) data

BackgroundFor the elderly patients with gastric cancer, it may be more challenging to tolerate complete neoadjuvant therapy (NAT). The impact of discontinued NAT on the surgical safety and pathological outcomes of elderly patients with poor tolerance remains poorly understood.MethodsGastric cancer patients received gastrectomy with curative intent from the Dutch upper GI cancer audit (DUCA) database were included in this study. The independent association of age with not initiating and discontinuation of NAT was assessed with restricted cubic splines (RCS). According to the RCS results, age ≥ 70 years was defined as elderly. Short-term postoperative outcomes and pathological results were compared between elderly patients who completed and discontinued NAT.ResultsBetween 2011- 2021, total of 3049 patients were included. The risk of not initiating NAT increased from 70 years. In 1954 (64%) patients receiving NAT, the risk of discontinuation increased from 55 years, reaching the peak around 74 years. In the elderly, discontinued NAT was not independently associated with worse 30-day mortality, overall complications, anastomotic leakage, re-intervention, and pathologic complete response, but was associated with a higher risk of R1/2 resection (p-value = 0.001), higher ypT stage (p-value = 0.004), ypN + (p-value = 0.008), and non-response ( p-value = 0.012).ConclusionA decreased utilization of NAT has been observed in Dutch gastric cancer patients from 70 years due to old age considerations, possibly because of their high risk of discontinuation. Increasing the utilization of NAT may not adversely impact the surgical safety of gastric cancer population ≥ 70 years and may contribute to better pathological results.

Prediction of pathological complete response and prognosis in locally advanced rectal cancer.

Colorectal cancer is currently the third most common malignant tumor and the second leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) is standard for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). Except for pathological examination after resection, it is not known exactly whether LARC patients have achieved pathological complete response (pCR) before surgery. To date, there are no clear clinical indicators that can predict the efficacy of nCRT and patient outcomes. To investigate the indicators that can predict pCR and long-term outcomes following nCRT in patients with LARC. Clinical data of 128 LARC patients admitted to our hospital between September 2013 and November 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were categorized into pCR and non-pCR groups. Univariate analysis (using the χ 2 test or Fisher's exact test) and logistic multivariate regression analysis were used to study clinical predictors affecting pCR. The 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were calculated using Kaplan-Meier analysis, and differences in survival curves were assessed with the log-rank test. Univariate analysis showed that pretreatment carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level, lymphocyte-monocyte ratio (LMR), time interval between neoadjuvant therapy completion and total mesorectal excision, and tumor size were correlated with pCR. Multivariate results showed that CEA ≤ 5 ng/mL (P = 0.039), LMR > 2.73 (P = 0.023), and time interval > 10 wk (P = 0.039) were independent predictors for pCR. Survival analysis demonstrated that patients in the pCR group had significantly higher 5-year DFS rates (94.7% vs 59.7%, P = 0.002) and 5-year OS rates (95.8% vs 80.1%, P = 0.019) compared to the non-pCR group. Tumor deposits (TDs) were significantly correlated with shorter DFS (P = 0.002) and OS (P < 0.001). Pretreatment CEA, LMR, and time interval contribute to predicting nCRT efficacy in LARC patients. Achieving pCR demonstrates longer DFS and OS. TDs correlate with poor prognosis.

An open, prospective, single arm, phase II study of cadonilimab (PD-1/CTLA-4 bispecific antibody) with neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with advanced ovarian cancer: Interim analysis from the AK104-IIT-003 study.

e17552 Background: There is an unmet need to improve neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) to decrease postoperative residual disease (R0 rate: 50%) and improve prognosis in ovarian cancer (OC). R0 rate and histopathological response of interval cytoreductive surgery (IDS) after NAC combined with immune checkpoint blockades were reported to be encouraging. Cadonilimab (AK104) is a tetravalent bispecific antibody targeting PD-1 and CTLA-4. In this study, we report the efficacy and safety of AK104 with NAC in patients with advanced-stage ovarian cancer (NCT05430906). Methods: This study is an open-label, prospective, single arm, phase II study of evaluating the efficacy and safety of cadonilimab combined with chemotherapy as neoadjuvant treatment for advanced ovarian cancer. Patients received neoadjuvant therapy of cadonilimab plus platinum-taxane chemotherapy (3 to 4 cycles) followed by surgery. Surgery would be performed within 30 days of completion of neoadjuvant therapy. The primary endpoint was the R0 rate. The secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), chemotherapy response score (CRS), pathologic complete response(pCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and safety. A sample size of 35 achieves 80% power to detect a difference of 0.2 using a two-sided Z-test to estimate the standard deviation with a significance level (alpha) of 0.1. And the sample size was expected to be 40 cases to ensure that the FAS set contains 35 cases for analysis. Results: 17 patients were enrolled from Dec 12, 2022, to Dec 6, 2023. The median patient age was 57 years (range 45–70 years), and most patients presented with high-grade serous carcinoma (94.1%) and stage IVa (5.9%), IVb disease (76.5%). 15 (88.2%) patients had undergone IDS, with an R0 resection rate of 66.7%. ORR was 94.1%, with 1patient achieved CR and 15 patients achieved PR. 11.8% achieved pathological complete response, and 17.6% had a chemotherapy response score (CRS) of 3. PFS or OS data are not mature by cut-off date. Safety and adverse event (AE) were analyzed after completion of neoadjuvant therapy. Treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) of any grade were evaluated for all study populations. TRAEs of any grade occurred in 13 (76.5%) patients. Grade ≥3 TRAEs occurred in 3 (17.6%) patients. The most common TRAEs were thyroid dysfunction (23.5%) and bone marrow suppression (17.6%). Grade ≥ 3 irAE (immune⁃mediated colitis) occurred in 1 (5.9%) patient. All of the TRAEs, including severe AEs, were manageable, with no new safety concerns in this study. Conclusions: This study showed promising activity with a durable clinical response, supporting the potential of NAC with bispecific antibody AK104 in advanced-stage ovarian cancer. Meanwhile, long-term efficacy evaluation still needs following up. Clinical trial information: NCT05430906 .

Efficacy and safety of disitamab vedotin (RC48) combined with camrelizumab and S-1 for neoadjuvant therapy of locally advanced gastric cancer with HER2 overexpression: Preliminary results of a prospective, single-arm, phase II study.

e16100 Background: A combination of HER2-targeted therapy, immunotherapy and chemotherapy is being explored in the perioperative treatment of gastric/gastric junction (GC/GEJ) adenocarcinoma.Disitamab vedotin (RC48), a HER2-directed antibody-drug conjugate (ADC), demonstrated significant anti-tumor activity. Moreover, data suggest that the combination of RC48 with immunotherapy exhibits a synergistic effect. Therefore, we conducted the study to investigate the effects of combining RC48 with camrelizumab and S-1 in the neoadjuvant setting for locally advanced, resectable GC/GEJC with HER2 overexpression. Methods: In this prospective, phase II, single-arm study, we included patients with histologically confirmed, resectable gastric/gastric junction adenocarcinoma (GC/GEJ) staged as cT3-4aN1-3M0 according to the TNM 8th edition, and demonstrating HER2 overexpression (IHC 3+ or IHC 2+). Participants received three cycles of treatment on a three-weekly basis (Q3W). Surgical resection was scheduled to occur 3-4 weeks following the completion of neoadjuvant therapy. The primary endpoint was the pathological complete response (pCR) rate; the secondary endpoints included the major pathological response (MPR) rate, clinical downgrading rate, disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Results: Between Sep 18, 2022 and Feb 2, 2024, a total of 23 patients were enrolled. Seven patients had not completed neoadjuvant treatment.Two patients refused surgery due to organ preservation. Two patients refused study therapy after 2 cycles of neoadjuvant treatment. 12 patients who experienced D2 resection, 6 (50%) achieved MPR, including 4 (33.3%) with pCR (ypT0N0M0).The R0 resection rate was 100%. Median DFS and OS have not been reached. The most common reported AEs (grade≥3) were decreased neutrophil count (10%), bowel obstruction (5%), ALT increased (5%) and AST increased (5%). There have been no treatment-related mortalities documented. Conclusions: The preliminary findings suggest that the neoadjuvant combination of RC48, camrelizumab and S-1 presents a promising and safe treatment option for locally advanced resectable GC/GEJ adenocarcinoma with HER2 overexpression. Clinical trial information: ChiCTR2300075446.

An open-label, single-center phase II trial of cadonilimab (an anti-PD-1/CTLA-4 bispecific antibody) in combination with platinum-based dual-drug neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced, resectable head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

6044 Background: Consensus on neoadjuvant treatment strategies for resectable head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is not proposed currently. Preclinical and clinical findings suggested that PD-1/CTLA-4 bispecific antibodies may have synergistic anti-tumor activity. This study aimed to explore the safety and activity of cadonilimab in combination with platinum-based dual-drug neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced, resectable HNSCC. Methods: In this open-label phase II trial, eligible patients with untreated locally advanced, resectable HNSCC (T2N2-3M0、T3-4N0-3M0; stage III-IV, AJCC 8th Edition) were enrolled to receive cadonilimab (10 mg/kg) and platinum-based dual-drug [docetaxel (75 mg/m2) plus cisplatin (60 mg/m2)] on day 1 of each 21-day cycle for three cycles, followed by surgery and postoperative adjuvant therapy. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST1.1. Secondary endpoints included pathologic complete response (pCR), safety, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS). Results: Between July 2023 and December 2023, 24 patients were enrolled (median age, 55 years [range 34–69]; 21 men [87.5%]), tumors were located in the oral cavity (10/24, 41.7%), hypopharynx (8/24, 33.3%) and larynx (6/24, 25.0%), 20 (83.3%) patients were clinical T3/4 while 10 patients (41.7%) ≥N2 . After completion of neoadjuvant therapy, the ORR was 87.5% (21/24). Of the 24 patients, 12 (50.0%) patients reached pCR. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 14 (58.3%) patients. Grade 3-4 TRAEs were reported in 4 (16.7%) patients, including rash (12.5%), pruritus (12.5%) and Guillain-Barre syndrome (4.2%). DFS and OS data were not yet mature as of the cutoff date (January 1,2024). Conclusions: Cadonilimab plus platinum-based dual-drug neoadjuvant chemotherapy achieved favorable ORR and pCR with manageable toxicities in patients with HNSCC. Follow-up is still underway to obtain long-term survival data. Clinical trial information: NCT06023875 .

Assessment of breast cancer optimal care timeframes in a regional and rural real-world setting: A regional cancer centre experience in Australia.

e12614 Background: The Breast Cancer Optimal Care Pathway (Cancer Australia) is a national patient-centred guideline that seeks to standardise the management pathway for breast cancer patients and spans from early diagnosis through to survivorship. The guideline provides suggested optimal management-based timeframes including the time from general practitioner (GP) referral to specialist review (&lt;2 weeks), time from specialist review to completion of investigations and multidisciplinary discussion (MDT) (&lt;2 weeks), time to initiation of neoadjuvant therapy from MDT (&lt;4 weeks) and time to surgery following completion of neoadjuvant therapy (&lt;6 weeks). Methods: Retrospective data was obtained for patients undergoing neoadjuvant systemic therapy for newly diagnosed breast cancer between 2021 and 2023 at a regional tertiary cancer centre in Australia (Townsville University Hospital). Data included baseline patient demographics, tumour characteristics, staging, key optimal care pathway timepoints, treatment regimen and outcomes. Median and interquartile range were calculated for key timepoints. Results: Overall, 53 patients (100% female) were identified for inclusion. 10% of patients identified as Indigenous (n=5), 36% lived rurally (n=19) and 13% were treated using a tele-chemotherapy model (n=7). Receptor status was triple-negative in 20 patients (38%), hormone-positive in 17 patients (32%) and HER2-positive in 16 patients (30%). 15% of patients had stage I disease (n=8), 58% had stage II disease (n=31), 21% had stage III disease (n=11), while 6% of patients had oligometastatic stage IV disease at diagnosis (n=3). 24 patients (50%) were seen by a specialist within 2 weeks of GP referral (median: 15 days; IQR 9-19). 46 patients (87%) had a definitive management plan formulated at MDT within 2 weeks of specialist review (median: 5 days; IQR 4-9), with delays most commonly due to pending investigations (n=5; 9%). 48 patients (91%) proceeded with neoadjuvant therapy within 4 weeks of MDT (median: 14 days; IQR 11-22), with delays most commonly due to concurrent infections including COVID. 90% of patients (n=46) were ultimately commenced on neoadjuvant treatment within the 8-week optimal care timeframe from initial GP referral (median: 34 days; IQR 27-47). In comparison to patients living locally, patients residing in rural areas were less likely to achieve this target (79% v 97%, p=0.05). 83% of patients (n=43) underwent surgery within 6-weeks of completion of neoadjuvant treatment (median: 30 days; IQR 27-34). Conclusions: The neoadjuvant breast cancer optimal care timeframes were feasible to achieve in a regional and rural setting. However, further targeted research is needed to improve adherence to optimal care standards for patients from rural areas, such as the timeframe from initial referral to completion of investigations and MDT.

A phase Ib, window-of-opportunity study of neoadjuvant avelumab and hypofractionated proton beam therapy for recurrent radiation-relapsed meningioma.

2015 Background: Effective treatments for recurrent meningiomas following radiation therapy (RT) are limited. Inhibitors of the programmed-death-1 (PD-1) or programmed-death ligand-1 (PD-L1) pathway have shown modest activity for these tumors in single-arm phase 2 studies. This study aims to evaluate the immunological effects of combining anti-PD-L1 (avelumab) with proton beam therapy (PBT) for recurrent radiation-relapsed meningiomas. Methods: Recurrent grade 1-3 meningiomas that failed prior surgery and RT were treated with neoadjuvant avelumab (10 mg/kg IV biweekly for 6 doses) plus hypofractionated PBT (20 Gy over 5 fractions), followed by surgery and additional adjuvant avelumab (up to 6 doses). Blood samples were collected pre-avelumab, at week 4, and before surgery. Eligibility criteria include age ≥ 18 years, KPS ≥ 60, surgery suitability, dexamethasone dose ≤ 4mg daily, normal organ function; no prior anti-PD1/PDL1 therapy, and absence of autoimmunity. RNA-sequencing (RNAseq) and multiplex immunofluorescence (MxIF) were performed on pre- and post-avelumab tumor tissues; blood samples underwent multiplex flow cytometry (MxFC). Results: Between March 2018 to March 2023, 9 patients (22% grade 1, 56% grade 2, and 22% grade 3) were enrolled in the study. All completed neoadjuvant therapy, one forwent surgery due to dramatic radiological response, and two did not complete adjuvant avelumab (due to patient preference and infusion reaction). There was no dose-limiting toxicity or unexpected toxicity. After a median follow-up of 43.0 month and a minimum follow-up of 21.7 months, 8 patients have progressed, and 2 patients with progression have died. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 19.1 months (95% CI: 15.2-23.0), with the median overall survival not yet reached. Three patients demonstrated notably prolonged PFS (37.7, 58.5 months, and ongoing). RNAseq showed significant increase in T-cell and macrophage gene expression in post-treatment tissues compared to pre-treatment. MxIF revealed a marked increase in T-cell and CD68+ macrophage infiltration in the long-PFS patients’ post-treatment tissues, a pattern not observed in the short-PFS patients. Particularly, the long-PFS patients’ post-treatment tissues displayed increased infiltration of CD68+HLADR+ macrophages, likely of M1-phenotype. In contrast, the pre- and post-treatment tissues from the short-PFS patients predominantly featured CD206+ macrophages, likely of M2-phenotype. A trend towards increased number of primed T cells in the peripheral blood was observed in the long-PFS patients at week 4. Conclusions: Avelumab combined with RT may induce an immunological response in some radiation-relapsed meningioma patients, leading to prolonged remission. Further investigations with larger prospective studies and predictive biomarkers are warranted. Clinical trial information: NCT03267836 .

Neoadjuvant toripalimab plus chemotherapy for resectable stage II-IIIB non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer with EGFR mutations: A multi-center, multi-cohort, exploratory study.

TPS8120 Background: Neoadjuvant immunotherapy has been widely applied in the treatment of resectable stage II-IIIB NSCLC patients without driver gene mutation. However, as for the EGFR-positive patients, the therapeutic effect of neoadjuvant treatment, either TKI or chemotherapy, is far from satisfied and the outcome of neoadjuvant immunotherapy plus chemotherapy in these patients remains an unanswered but crucial question. Herein, we conducted a phase 2 prospective trial (NCT05962021). Methods: This is a multicenter, multi-cohort prospective phase 2 study in the treatment-naïve patients with resectable stage II-IIIB (N2) (AJCC 8th edition) non-squamous NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations (19DEL or L858R). Enrolled patients will be divided into two cohorts according to EGFR status and receive neoadjuvant toripalimab (240mg, q3w) plus platinum-based doublet chemotherapy (pemetrexed 500mg/m2 plus carboplatin AUC 5, q3w) for 3 cycles. Surgery will be performed after completion of neoadjuvant therapy based on the multidisciplinary discussion, while local radiotherapy will be considered if the patient cannot undergo surgery due to disease progression. Key inclusion criteria: non-squamous NSCLC, resectable stage II-IIIB (N2), EGFR mutations (19DEL or L858R), age≥18 years, ECOG PS 0-1 and adequate cardiopulmonary function. Exclusion criteria: prior systemic anticancer treatment, contraindication to immunotherapy, active autoimmune disease. Adequate pre-treatment tissue samples are required for RT-PCR or next-generation sequencing to determine the EGFR mutation status and PD-L1 expression immunohistochemical detection. The primary study endpoint is complete pathological response (pCR) rate, per blinded independent pathologist review. Simon's optimal two-stage design will be used to test the null hypothesis of pCR rate ≤5% and alternative hypothesis of pCR rate ≥15%, and 5 or more pCRs among 56 patients per arm are needed for the primary endpoint to be met. Secondary endpoints include major pathological response (MPR) rate, pCR/MPR rate in different EGFR mutation subgroups (19DEL or L858R) and different PD-L1 expression subgroups (TPS &lt; 1% and ≥ 1%), event-free survival and safety and tolerability. Peripheral blood, stool and tissue samples will be obtained longitudinally at baseline, during perioperation and at follow-ups for exploratory analysis. Clinical trial information: NCT05962021 .

Baseline heterogeneity of myeloid and stroma cells to predict pCR, baseline lymph node (LN) metastasis, and 1-year EFS in locally advanced ESCC with neoadjuvant immunotherapy: Final results from a single-arm, phase II clinical trial (SEEK-01).

e14661 Background: Response of neoadjuvant immunotherapy can vary among patients in locally advanced ESCC, with the lack of a promising biomarker which need fully capture the heterogeneity of TME. Now, based on final results of the SEEK-01 study (2023 ASCO, P#4047), we have, for the first time, established a precise correlation from baseline TME to pathological response, baseline LN status, and 1-year EFS. Methods: In SEEK-01 study, 22 locally advanced ESCC patients (cT2-4NxM0) were enrolled. Following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (paclitaxel-albumin+carboplatin) combined with tislelizumab, patients underwent minimal invasive esophagectomy (MIE). Fresh tumor tissues were obtained via endoscopy prior to neoadjuvant therapy for scRNAseq analysis. Pathological response was evaluated using the irRVT score, leading to classification into pCR (irRVT=0%), MPR (0&lt;irRVT&lt;10%), and non-responder (irRVT&gt;60%). Baseline LN status was determined based on pathological diagnosis after surgery. We identified subclusters of tumor-associated myeloid cells and stroma cells that significantly predicted pathological response, baseline LN metastasis and recurrence within 1 year. Prediction model of efficacy for neoadjuvant immunotherapy was developed using baseline expression ratios of differential subclusters. Results: Among 22 enrolled patients, 18 completed neoadjuvant therapy and MIE. 4 achieved pCR, 2 got MPR and 6 were non-responder. 12 of 18 proved baseline LN metastasis. 5 of 18 suffered recurrence within 1 year. Myeloid cells, cancer-associated fibroblast (Caf) and endothelium (Endo) shew heterogeneity that can predict pathological response, baseline LN metastasis or recurrence within 1 year. Upgrade of CXCL9+ tumor-associated-macrophage (TAM), LAMP3+mregDC3 was a strong predictor of pCR, while the upgrade of STAT1+TAM, C1q+TAM, IL1b+TAM, IL1b+ Neutrophil, C1q+ Neutrophil was a solid biomarker of non-responder. Besides, presence of PTGS1+Caf, RGS5+Caf, S100B+Caf, RND1+Endo and S100+Endo highly correlated with baseline LN metastasis and recurrence within 1 year, which was better than PET-CT. On this basis, we constructed predictive models for pathological response. With further validated by public scRNAseq and TCGA database, it showed excellent predictive ability and robustness. Conclusions: The final results of the SEEK-01 study demonstrate the differential baseline infiltration of myeloid cells that can predict pathological response of neoadjuvant immunotherapy. The characteristic changes in Caf and Endo in TME can predict occult LN metastasis and 1-year EFS. A predictive model for efficacy of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in locally advanced ESCC was developed to facilitate individualized and precise neoadjuvant therapy before treatment. Clinical trial information: NCT05807542 .

Abstract PO4-19-05: OptimICE-pCR: De-escalation of therapy in early-stage TNBC patients who achieve pCR after neoadjuvant chemotherapy with checkpoint inhibitor therapy (Alliance A012103)

Abstract Background: For patients with stage II-III triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), standard of care systemic therapy consists of neoadjuvant pembrolizumab with chemotherapy, followed by 27 weeks of adjuvant pembrolizumab based on the results of the phase III KEYNOTE-522 trial. This trial demonstrated that pathologic complete response (pCR) rates and event-free survival (EFS) were significantly better among patients who received neoadjuvant followed by adjuvant pembrolizumab in addition to chemotherapy compared to chemotherapy alone. An exploratory analysis from this study demonstrated better EFS among patients who experienced a pathologic complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant therapy compared to those with residual disease. Additionally, other studies, including GeparNuevo, which did not include adjuvant checkpoint inhibition, demonstrated EFS benefit from the addition of preoperative checkpoint inhibitor therapy to chemotherapy. It is therefore unclear if adjuvant pembrolizumab improves outcomes for patients with early-stage TNBC who achieve a pCR after neoadjuvant pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy. OptimICE-pCR trial utilizes response to preoperative therapy to tailor adjuvant therapy, and the goal is to determine whether patients who achieve pCR to pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy can achieve a similar recurrence-free survival (RFS) with observation compared to adjuvant pembrolizumab monotherapy Methods: OptimICE-pCR is an open-label, multicenter, randomized phase III trial that is enrolling patients with stage T1cN1-2 or T2-4N0-2 TNBC. To be eligible, patients must have experienced a pCR after the completion of neoadjuvant therapy containing a minimum of six cycles of chemotherapy in combination with pembrolizumab. Participants are randomized 1:1 to receive either 27 weeks of adjuvant pembrolizumab or to observation. Participants on the pembrolizumab arm receive pembrolizumab 200 mg IV on day 1 of each 21-day cycle for 9 cycles, or 400 mg IV on day 1 of each 42-day cycle for 4 cycles, followed by one dose of 200 mg IV every 21 days. The primary objective is to evaluate whether observation results in non-inferior RFS compared to adjuvant pembrolizumab. Non-inferiority is defined as an estimated 3-year RFS of 91% or higher in the observation arm compared to 94% in the pembrolizumab arm. The total sample size will be 1,295 patients, which will provide 80% power at one-sided significance level of 0.05 to detect this difference, which corresponds to a non-inferiority hazard ratio of 1.52. Key secondary endpoints include overall survival, locoregional recurrence, quality of life, financial toxicity, work productivity impairment, cost-effectiveness, and safety and tolerability. Key correlative objectives include detection of ctDNA at baseline and association with RFS and association of key biomarkers (TILs, PDL1, immune gene expression) from the primary tumor with RFS. The trial is currently open and enrolling patients. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882; U24 CA196171; U10CA180820 (ECOG-ACRIN); U10CA180863 (CCTG); https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05812807 Citation Format: Sara Tolaney, Karla Ballman, Charles M Perou, David Cescon, Margaret Gatti-Mays, Victoria Blinder, Shoshana Rosenberg, Elizabeth Mittendorf, Anna Weiss, Hope Rugo, Alice Ho, Dana Casey, Baljit Singh, Fabrice Smieliauskas, Yara Abdou, Vijay Damarla, Jane Meisel, Lisa Carey, Ann Partridge. OptimICE-pCR: De-escalation of therapy in early-stage TNBC patients who achieve pCR after neoadjuvant chemotherapy with checkpoint inhibitor therapy (Alliance A012103) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO4-19-05.

Abstract PO1-20-11: Delay in Diagnosis of Locally Advanced Breast Cancer during Lactation “Case Report”

Abstract A 38-year-old breastfeeding female with no family history of breast or gynecological cancer presented to her PCP with a 4-month history of galactorrhea and enlarged left-sided breast mass. On physical exam, a 4-inch round complex, nonmobile, non-tender mass in the left breast and bloody-to-pink discharge from the nipple was present on the exam. Diagnostic mammogram and US revealed BIRADS 5, microcalcifications consistent with DCIS, 4-cm mass, with a positive lymph node (LN), and needle core biopsy of both breast and LN, showed DCIS and metastatic carcinoma, respectively. Further workup did not show distant or skeletal metastatic disease. Therefore, a diagnosis was made, and the patient was provided a clinical-stage cT3, cN2, cM0, ER+, PR-, and HER2+. The patient completed neoadjuvant therapy with TCHP and underwent a left lumpectomy with sentinel LN biopsy. Additionally, pathology diagnosis showed scant residual DCIS (10mm) and no metastatic disease in the LN. After that, the patient completed adjuvant radiotherapy and was placed on adjuvant therapy with trastuzumab and pertuzumab. In conclusion, any breast abnormality reported by a pregnant or breastfeeding woman should not be neglected and assumed that it is a regular and physiological change until proven otherwise. Future proposals include guidelines for managing abnormal breast findings during pregnancy. Citation Format: Jesus Flores Banda, Kavitha Donthireddy. Delay in Diagnosis of Locally Advanced Breast Cancer during Lactation “Case Report” [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO1-20-11.

Phase Ⅱ clinical trial of PD-1 inhibitor combined with chemotherapy for locally advanced resectable oral squamous cell carcinoma

Objective: To explore the effectiveness and safety of programmed death 1(PD-1) inhibitory combined with chemotherapy as a neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced resectable oral squamous cell carcinoma. Methods: This study was a randomized controlled phase Ⅱ trial. Patients recruited from Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital from July 2021 to February 2023 were randomly divided into two groups in a 1∶1 ratio: the experimental group (Toripalimab combined with albumin paclitaxel and cisplatin) and the control group (albumin paclitaxel and cisplatin); patients in both groups underwent three cycles of neoadjuvant therapy. After completion of neoadjuvant therapy, patients were evaluated and subsequent surgical treatment was performed. According to the completion of treatment, the analysis was conducted on both the full analysis set and the protocol set. The effectiveness and safety of treatments were evaluated. SPSS 20.0 software was used for statistical analysis. Results: A total of 41 cases with oral cancer were enrolled, including 26 males and 15 females, aged between 34 and 74 years old. There were 23 cases in the experimental group and 18 cases in the control group. A total of 23 cases completed neoadjuvant therapy and surgery according to the protocol. Experimental group and control group showed respectively the complete response rates of 1/19 and 0/17, the partial response rates of 13/19 and 8/17, the stage-down rates of 4/19 and 3/17, the pathologic complete response rate of 8/14 and 2/9, with no statistically significant differences in individual rates between two groups (P>0.05). The major pathological response rate of 13/14 in experimental group was higher than that of 2/9 in control group (P<0.05). The incidence of grade 3-4 adverse reactions related to treatment was low in both groups (4/23 vs. 3/18, χ2=0.13, P=0.72), and the most common serious adverse reactions in the experimental group were granulocyte deficiency and electrolyte disorder. There were no adverse reactions that affected subsequent surgical treatment or caused death, and the safety and tolerability were good. The median follow-up time was 15 months, and the one-year disease-free survival rate of the experimental group was higher than that of control group (92.86% vs. 77.78%, χ2=0.62, P=0.42), with a relative decrease of 87% in the risk of disease progression or death (P=0.029). For patients with programmed death-ligand 1(PD-L1) protein expression combined positive score≥20, the experimental group showed higher major pathological response rate than control group (5/5 vs. 0/4, P=0.03). Conclusion: The neoadjuvant therapy of immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy can improve the pathological remission of oral squamous cell carcinoma and the long-term survival benefits and the prognosis of patients.

Abstract CT209: Camrelizumab plus chemotherapy as neoadjuvant treatment for resectable locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (LA-ESCC): A single-center, randomized, phase II trial

Abstract Background:Neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery poses the standard treatment for resectable LA-ESCC. However, post-surgery recurrence remains a concern. The phase III ESCORT-1st trial demonstrated improved survival outcomes on the addition of camrelizumab to first-line chemotherapy over chemotherapy alone. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant camrelizumab plus chemotherapy followed by surgery in resectable LA-ESCC. Methods:In this single-center, open-label, randomized, two-arm, phase II trial, patients with resectable thoracic LA-ESCC (T3-4a or TxN+M0, except T4b) were 1:1 randomized to two groups for 3 cycles of neoadjuvant therapy, each lasting 3 weeks. Group A was treated with a combination of camrelizumab (200 mg, day 1), paclitaxel (80 mg/m², days 1 and 8), and cisplatin (75 mg/m², day 1). Group B received the same dose of camrelizumab and cisplatin, with albumin-bound paclitaxel (130 mg/m², days 1 and 8) instead. Surgery was scheduled within 3-10 weeks after the completion of neoadjuvant therapy. Adjuvant treatment was determined by the investigators, based on postoperative pathological findings. For biomarker analysis, blood and tissue samples were collected at baseline, after 2 cycles of neoadjuvant therapy, and postoperatively. The primary endpoint was the correlation between biomarkers and pathologic complete response (pCR, defined as ypT0N0). The second endpoints included event-free survival, overall survival, and safety. Clinical trial information: NCT04937673 Results:From June 2021 to April 2023, a total of 40 patients were enrolled: 20 patients in each group. By data cutoff on July 31st 2023, 19 patients in group A had completed 3 cycles of neoadjuvant therapy; 17 underwent surgery, with 2 refusals and 1 COVID-19-related delay. In group B, 17 patients completed neoadjuvant therapy, and surgery was performed on 14 patients with 5 refusals and 1 exclusion by investigators. R0 resection was achieved in 16 (94.1%) patients from group A and 14 (100.0%) from group B. In intention-to-treatment (ITT) analysis set, the pCR rate was numerically higher in groups A (30.0% [95%CI: 11.9- 54.3%]) compared to group B (10.0% [95%CI: 1.2-31.7%]). Similarly, a major pathologic response (tumor residual ≤10%) was observed in 50.0% (95% CI: 27.2-72.8%) of group A and 35.0% (95% CI: 15.4-59.2%) of group B patients. Postoperative complications were reported in 5 (29.4%) and 4 (28.6%) patients in groups A and B, respectively. Notably, 1 patient from group A developed grade ≥3 acute renal failure and 1 from group B experienced grade ≥3 pleural effusion requiring drainage. Grade ≥3 TEAEs occurred in 25.0% patients from group A and 40.0% from group B. Conclusions:In resectable LA-ESCC patients, neoadjuvant camrelizumab and cisplatin combined with paclitaxel or albumin-bound paclitaxel was well tolerated and showed promising anti-tumor activity. Citation Format: Zhihao Lu, Yanshuo Cao, Liang Dai, Fengxiao Dong, Lin Shen. Camrelizumab plus chemotherapy as neoadjuvant treatment for resectable locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (LA-ESCC): A single-center, randomized, phase II trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 2 (Late-Breaking, Clinical Trial, and Invited Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(7_Suppl):Abstract nr CT209.

Perioperative Chemotherapy for Gastro-Esophageal or Gastric Cancer: Anthracyclin Triplets versus FLOT.

Background: The FLOT4-AIO trial (2019) showed improved survival with perioperative fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel (FLOT) compared to anthracyclin triplets in gastric cancer treatment. It is unclear whether these results extend to real-world scenarios in the Netherlands. This study aimed to compare outcomes of perioperative FLOT to anthracyclin triplets in a real-world Dutch gastric cancer population. Methods: Patients diagnosed with resectable (cT2-4a/cTxN0-3/NxM0) gastric or gastro-esophageal junction carcinoma between 2015-2021 who received neoadjuvant FLOT or anthracyclin triplets were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS), analyzed through multivariable Cox regression. Secondary outcomes included pathological complete response (pCR), neoadjuvant chemotherapy cycle completion, surgical resection rates, and adjuvant therapy. Results: Adjusted OS showed no significant survival benefit (HR = 0.88, 95% CI 0.77-1.01, p = 0.07), even though the median OS was numerically improved by 8 months with FLOT compared to anthracyclin triplets (48.1 vs. 39.9 months, p = 0.16). FLOT patients were more likely to undergo diagnostic staging laparoscopies (74.2% vs. 44.1%, p < 0.001), had higher rates of completing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (OR = 1.35, 95% CI 1.09-1.68, p = 0.007), receiving adjuvant therapy (OR = 1.34, 95% CI 1.08-1.66, p = 0.08), and achieving pCR (OR = 1.52, 95% CI 1.05-2.20, p = 0.03). No significant differences were observed in (radical) resection rates. Conclusion(s): Real-world data showed no significant OS improvement for FLOT-treated patients compared to anthracyclin triplets, despite more staging laparoscopies. However, FLOT patients demonstrated higher rates of neoadjuvant therapy completion, proceeding to adjuvant therapy, and increased pCR rates. Therefore, we recommend the continued use of neoadjuvant FLOT therapy in the current clinical setting.