Complete Virological Response Rate Research Articles

The co-existence of NAFLD and CHB is associated with suboptimal viral and biochemical response to CHB antiviral therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background and aimsChronic hepatitis B (CHB) and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) are leading causes of liver-related morbidity and mortality. The interaction between these two disease processes is poorly defined and the impact of NAFLD on HBV-related cirrhosis and HCC remains unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of NAFLD on response to antiviral CHB therapy to inform the debate on changing CHB treatment thresholds for these comorbid patients.MethodsStudies with a minimum of 50 adult CHB patients on nucleoside analogue therapy with or without concurrent NAFLD were identified from PubMed/Medline and EMBASE to February 21, 2023. Data extraction from each study included HBeAg and treatment status, diagnostic method of NAFLD, frequency of monitoring intervals, patient age, gender, grade of hepatic steatosis, BMI and metabolic comorbidities. The outcomes of interest, complete virological response (CVR), biochemical response (BR) and HBeAg loss/seroconversion, were recorded at each available monitoring interval. Comparing CHB-NAFLD and CHB-only groups, pooled odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using random- or fixed-effects models depending on heterogeneity.ResultsFrom a search of 470 citations, we identified 32 potentially relevant papers. Overall, 11 studies, comprising 2580 unique patients, met the inclusion criteria of the meta-analysis. CHB-NAFLD patients exhibited significantly lower rates of CVR compared to CHB-only patients. This was demonstrated by an OR of 0.59 (0.38-0.93, p=0.001, I2 = 72%) at 12 months, which tapered off to an OR of 0.67 (0.48-0.95, p=0.02) at 60 months. CHB-NAFLD patients also exhibited significantly lower rates of BR compared to CHB-only patients, as demonstrated by ORs of 0.39 (0.24-0.62, p<0.0001, I2 = 53%) at 12 months and 0.33 (0.17-0.63, p=0.0008) at 24 months.ConclusionPatients with concurrent CHB and NAFLD experience delayed CVR to antiviral therapy and more persistent biochemical abnormalities in comparison to patients with CHB only. This supports the argument for earlier antiviral therapy in order to avert CHB complications in these multi-morbid patients, as the global disease burden of NAFLD continues to increase.

Real-world study on the efficacy and safety of first-line antiviral therapy for chronic hepatitis B

Objective: To clarify the clinical efficacy of first-line oral antiviral drugs tenofovir alafenamide (TAF), tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF), and entecavir (ETV) in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) and their safety profiles with lipid, bone, and kidney metabolism. Methods: 458 CHB cases diagnosed and treated at the Department of Hepatology of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine of the Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University from February 2010 to November 2022 were selected. TAF (175 cases), TDF (124 cases), and ETV (159 cases) were used as therapies. At 24 and 48 weeks, the virology, biochemical response, changes in liver stiffness measurement (LSM), and bone, kidney, and blood lipid metabolism safety profiles were compared and analyzed. Results: After 24 and 48 weeks of TAF, TDF, and ETV therapy, HBV DNA load decreased by 3.28, 2.69, and 3.14 log10 IU/ml and 3.28, 2.83, and 3.65 log10 IU/ml, respectively, compared with the baseline, and the differences between the three groups were statistically significant, P < 0.001. The complete virological response rates were 73.95%, 66.09%, 67.19%, and 82.22%, 72.48%, and 70.49%, respectively. The incidence rates of low-level viremia were 16.67%, 21.70%, and 23.08%, while poor response rates were 1.11%, 3.67%, and 4.10%. ALT normalization rates were 64.00%, 63.89%, 67.96%, and 85.33%, 80.56%, 78.64%, respectively, and there was no statistically significant difference among the groups. LSM was significantly improved in patients treated with TAF for 48 weeks, P = 0.022. Serum phosphorus level gradually decreased with the prolongation of TDF treatment. The TAF treatment group had a good safety profile for kidney, bone, and phosphorus metabolism, with no dyslipidemia or related occurrences of risk. Conclusion: There are some differences in the therapeutic effects of first-line anti-HBV drugs. TAF has the lowest incidence of low-level viremia after 48 weeks of treatment and has a good safety profile in kidney, bone, and blood lipid metabolism.

Switching from entecavir to tenofovir alafenamide for maintaining complete virological response in chronic hepatitis B.

Hepatocellular carcinoma development can be decreased by achieving and maintaining complete virological response (CVR) in chronic hepatitis B. However, it is unclear whether switching from entecavir (ETV) to tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) could achieve and maintain CVR in patients with low-level viremia (LLV; HBV DNA ≤ 3.3 log IU/mL) or occasional detectable HBV DNA during ETV treatment. Therefore, we aimed to examine whether the switching from ETV to TAF is effective in achieving CVR in patients with LLV or occasional detectable HBV DNA. This study comprised 45 patients who switched from ETV to TAF. All patients received ETV and TAF for >2 years, and the HBV DNA levels were measured every 3 months. Maintaining undetectable HBV DNA during 2-year period is defined as CVR. The primary endpoint is the CVR rate during ETV and TAF treatment. The CVR rate for each of the 2 years of ETV and TAF therapy was 33.3% (15/45) and 68.9% (31/45, P < 0.01), respectively, and the CVR rate increased by switching from ETV to TAF. In patients with occasional detectable HBV DNA during ETV treatment (22 patients), 15 achieved CVR and 7 maintained occasional detectable HBV DNA. In patients with LLV during ETV treatment (eight patients), three achieved CVR and five had occasional detectable HBV DNA. Switching from ETV to TAF increases the CVR rate in patients with LLV or occasional detectable HBV DNA and could be an alternative treatment option.

Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of antiviral regimens for entecavir-resistant hepatitis B: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

BackgroundChronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients who had exposed to lamivudine (LAM) and telbivudine (LdT) had high risk of developing entecavir (ETV)-resistance after long-term treatment. We aimed to conduct a systematic review and a network meta-analysis on the efficacy and cost-effectiveness on antiviral regimens in CHB patients with ETV-resistance. Data sourcesWe searched PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science for studies on nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs) treatment [including tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF)-based rescue therapies, adefovir (ADV)-based rescue therapies and double-dose ETV therapy] in CHB patients with ETV-resistance. The network meta-analysis was conducted for 1-year complete virological response (CVR) and biological response (BR) rates using GeMTC and ADDIS. A cost-effective analysis was conducted to select an economic and effective treatment regimen based on the 1-year CVR rate. ResultsA total of 6 studies were finally included in this analysis. The antiviral efficacy was estimated. On network meta-analysis, the 1-year CVR rate in ETV-TDF [odds ratio (OR) = 22.30; 95 % confidence interval (CI): 2.78-241.93], LAM-TDF (OR = 70.67; 95 % CI: 5.16-1307.45) and TDF (OR = 16.90; 95 % CI: 2.28-186.30) groups were significantly higher than that in the ETV double-dose group; the 1-year CVR rate in the LAM-TDF group (OR = 14.82; 95 % CI: 1.03-220.31) was significantly higher than that in the LAM/LdT-ADV group. The 1-year BR rate of ETV-TDF (OR = 28.68; 95 % CI: 1.70-1505.08) and TDF (OR = 21.79; 95 % CI: 1.43-1070.09) therapies were significantly higher than that of ETV double-dose therapy. TDF-based therapies had the highest possibility to achieve the CVR and BR at 1 year, in which LAM-TDF combined therapy was the most effective regimen. The ratio of cost/effectiveness for 1-year treatment was 8 526, 17 649, 20 651 Yuan in the TDF group, TDF-ETV group, and ETV-ADV group, respectively. ConclusionsTDF-based combined therapies such as ETV-TDF and LAM-TDF therapies were the first-line treatment if financial condition is allowed.

Efficacy of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate therapy in nucleoside-analogue naive Iranian patients treated for chronic hepatitis B.

Background:Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) is a new effective treatment option for patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB).Objectives:To evaluate TDF efficacy in nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs)-naive Iranian patients with CHB.Patients and Methods:The NA-naive patients received TDF for at least six months. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving a complete virological response (CVR) during the treatment. Multivariate Cox regression analysis determined predictive factors independently associated with the time to CVR. The secondary endpoints were biochemical and serological responses, frequency of virological breakthrough, genotypic resistance development, safety and tolerability.Results:In all, 93 patients (64.5% hepatitis B e antigen [HBeAg]-negative) were eligible. Of these, 70 patients completed 24 months of treatment. The cumulative CVR rates in HBeAg-negative and HBeAg-positive patients were 87% versus 53% at 24 months, respectively. The multivariate Cox regression model showed only HBeAg positivity at baseline and a high baseline HBV DNA level were independent factors predicting a CVR. No patient achieved hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and HBeAg loss or seroconversion and no virologic breakthrough occurred. A new amino acid substitution (rtD263E) was observed to develop in 60% of patients with viremia.Conclusions:The cumulative CVR rates showed that patients with HBeAg-negative have better virologic respond than those with HBeAg-positive during the same period. The rtD263E mutation might be associated with partial resistance to TDF.

Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate has a substantial efficacy against multidrug-resistant strains of hepatitis B virus.

To evaluate the efficacy of tenofovir in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients with adefovir resistance (ADF-R) and suboptimal response to adefovir (ADF-S). Nucleos(t)ide analogue (NA)-naïve patients and patients with previous adefovir failure receiving tenofovir therapy for at least 6 months were included in the study. Biochemical and virological tests were obtained at baseline and 3-month intervals in the first year and every 6 months thereafter. The primary outcome measure was complete virological response (CVR) (HBVDNA < 20 IU/ml). CVR rates were calculated by Kaplan-Meier analysis, and a multivariate Cox proportional hazard model was generated to find out factors independently associated with CVR. A total of 165 patients (118 men, mean age 42 ± 12, 64 HBeAg(+) ) were included in the study. There were 105 patients in NA-naïve, 32 patients in ADF-S and 28 patients in ADF-R groups. All patients in the ADF-R group had multidrug resistance patterns. Mean duration of tenofovir treatment was 29 ± 14 months. CVR rates in NA-naïve, ADF-S and ADF-R groups were 65% vs. 75% vs. 58% at 12th month, 77% vs. 87% vs. 79% at 24th month and 83% vs. 94% vs. 79% at 36th month respectively. According to multivariate Cox regression model, HBeAg positivity (HR = 0.56, 95%CI 0.36-0.86, P = 0.008), high baseline HBVDNA level (HR = 0.64, 95%CI 0.55-0.74, P < 0.001) and ADF-R (HR = 0.47, 95%CI 0.28-0.81, P = 0.006) were independent predictors for CVR. Seven patients encountered mild renal dysfunction and were managed by dose adjustments. CVR rates during the follow-up show that tenofovir has a decreased, yet still potent in vivo efficacy against multidrug-resistant strains of HBV.

Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate monotherapy for nucleos(t)ide analogue-naïve and nucleos(t)ide analogue-experienced chronic hepatitis B patients.

Background/AimsThis study investigated the antiviral effects of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) monotherapy in nucleos(t)ide analogue (NA)-naive and NA-experienced chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients.MethodsCHB patients treated with TDF monotherapy (300 mg/day) for ≥12 weeks between December 2012 and July 2014 at a single center were retrospectively enrolled. Clinical, biochemical, and virological parameters were assessed every 12 weeks.ResultsIn total, 136 patients (median age 49 years, 96 males, 94 HBeAg positive, and 51 with liver cirrhosis) were included. Sixty-two patients were nucleos(t)ide (NA)-naïve, and 74 patients had prior NA therapy (NA-exp group), and 31 patients in the NA-exp group had lamivudine (LAM)-resistance (LAM-R group). The baseline serum hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA level was 4.9±2.3 log IU/mL (mean±SD), and was higher in the NA-naïve group than in the NA-exp and LAM-R groups (5.9±2.0 log IU/mL vs 3.9±2.0 log IU/mL vs 4.2±1.7 log IU/mL, P<0.01). The complete virological response (CVR) rate at week 48 in the NA-naïve group (71.4%) did not differ significantly from those in the NA-exp (71.3%) and LAM-R (66.1%) groups. In multivariate analysis, baseline serum HBV DNA was the only predictive factor for a CVR at week 48 (hazard ratio, 0.809; 95% confidence interval, 0.729-0.898), while the CVR rate did not differ with the NA experience.ConclusionsTDF monotherapy was effective for CHB treatment irrespective of prior NA treatment or LAM resistance. Baseline serum HBV DNA was the independent predictive factor for a CVR.

Tenofovir in the treatment of naïve and refractory chronic Hepatitis B: A single center experience in Saudi Arabia

Background/Aims:Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) is a nucleotide analog used in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) infection. This study evaluated the efficacy of TDF in achieving undetectable HBV DNA after 48 weeks of treatment in a Saudi cohort of CHB patients.Patients and Methods:This retrospective study included patients treated at a tertiary care center in Saudi Arabia from January 2009 to December 2012. Of the 68 eligible patients, 51 were treatment naïve and 17 were treatment-refractory. Twenty-three patients tested positive for HBeAg. The remaining 45 patients were HBeAg-negative.Results:The mean HBV DNA viral load decreased from 95 million IU/mL at baseline to 263 IU/mL after 48 weeks of treatment (P < 0.001). Overall, 62% of patients achieved a complete virological response (CVR) and 37% a partial virological response (PVR). Respective CVR and PVR rates according to subgroup were: HBeAg-positive (21.7% and 78.3%) and HBeAg-negative (84.4% and 15.6%). At 48 weeks, HBV DNA was undetectable in 66.7% of treatment-naïve and 53% of treatment-refractory patients (P = 0.3). Seroconversion occurred in 13 (57%) of HBeAg-positive patients. Two (3%) of the HBeAg-negative patients lost HBsAg at follow up. Mean alanine aminotransferase decreased significantly from 134 U/L before treatment to 37 U/L at 48 weeks (P < 0.001). Significant adverse events were not encountered during the study period.Conclusion:Forty-eight weeks of treatment with TDF reduced HBV DNA to undetectable levels in more than half of our patients regardless of whether they were treatment-naïve or refractory. HBeAg-negative (vs positive) patients experienced a better response rate.

Long-term efficacy of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate therapy after multiple nucleos(t)ide analogue failure in chronic hepatitis B patients.

Background/AimsThe efficacy of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients following prior treatment failure with multiple nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs) is not well defined, especially in Asian populations. In this study we investigated the efficacy and safety of TDF rescue therapy in CHB patients after multiple NA treatment failure.MethodsThe study retrospectively analyzed 52 CHB patients who experienced failure with two or more NAs and who were switched to regimens containing TDF. The efficacy and safety assessments included hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA undetectability, hepatitis B envelop antigen (HBeAg) seroclearance, alanine transaminase (ALT) normalization and changes in serum creatinine and phosphorus levels.ResultsThe mean HBV DNA level at baseline was 5.4 ± 1.76 log10 IU/mL. At a median duration of 34.5 months of TDF treatment, the cumulative probabilities of achieving complete virological response (CVR) were 25.0%, 51.8%, 74.2%, and 96.7% at 6, 12, 24, and 48 months, respectively. HBeAg seroclearance occurred in seven of 48 patients (14.6%). ALT levels were normalized in 27 of 31 patients (87.1%) with elevated ALT at baseline. Lower levels of HBV DNA at baseline were significantly associated with increased CVR rates (p < 0.001). However, CVR rates did not differ between TDF monotherapy or combination therapy with other NAs, and were not affected by mutations associated with resistance to NAs. No significant adverse events were observed.ConclusionsTDF is an efficient and safe rescue therapy for CHB patients after treatment failure with multiple NAs.

Effective antiviral therapy with entecavir in chronic hepatitis B virus carriers

To evaluate the short-term effect and safety of entecavir for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) virus carriers. Ninety-three cases of CHB virus infection (hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-positive, hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive, hepatitis B core antibody (HBcAb)-positive, HBV DNA≥1x10(5) copies/mL) were divided into two groups: CHB virus carrier (47 cases) and CHB (46 cases). All of the 93 cases were given 0.5 mg entecavir orally once a day for 48 weeks. Virology, serology and biochemistry tests were perrmed at treatment weeks 0, 4, 12, 24 and 48. Side effects of entecavir and the incidence of liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma were recorded. The CHB virus carrier and CHB group had complete virological response rates of 14.9% and 17.4% at week 4, 51.1% and 63.0% at week 12, 76.6% and 89.1% at week 24, and 97.9% and 100% at week 48, respectively; there was no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). The CHB virus carrier and CHB group had partial virological response rates of 42.6% and 47.8% at week 4, 57.44% and 65.2% at week 12, 85.0% and 89.1% at week 24, and 100% and 100% at week 48, respectively; there was no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). No cases in either group experienced virologic breakthrough during the treatment course. The CHB virus carrier and CHB group had serological response (HBeAg-negative) rates of 0 and 4.3% at week 4, 2.1% and 8.7% at week 12, 4.3% and 13.0% at week 24, and 8.5% and 21.7% at week 48, respectively; there was no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). The CHB virus carrier and CHB group had HBeAg seroconversion rates of 0 and 0 at week 4, 0 and 4.4% at week 12, 2.1% and 10.9% at week 24, and 6.4% and 17.4% at week 48, respectively; there was no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). No case in either group showed HBsAg-negativity and seroconversion during the treatment course. The CHB group had a biochemical response (alanine aminotransferase normalization) rate of 26.1% at week 4, 65.2% at week 12, 91.3% at week 24, and 97.8% at week 48.No case in either group showed biochemical breakthrough during the treatment course. There were no cases of liver cirrhosis or hepatocellular carcinoma in either group. There were no side effects of the entecavir treatment experienced in either group. Antiviral therapy with entecavir is effective, safe and well tolerated in CHB virus carriers.

Efficacy of Tenofovir in Patients with Lamivudine Failure Is Not Different from That in Nucleoside/Nucleotide Analogue-Naïve Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B

We evaluated the efficacy of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) in patients with lamivudine failure (LAM-F) in comparison with that in nucleoside/nucleotide analogue (NA)-naïve patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB). The criteria for inclusion were being NA naïve or having previous LAM-F and receiving TDF therapy for at least 6 months. Biochemical and virological tests were performed at the baseline, at 3-month intervals in the first year, and every 6 months thereafter. The primary outcome measure for efficacy was a complete virological response (CVR), defined as an HBV DNA level of <20 IU/ml. CVR rates were calculated by Kaplan-Meier analysis, and a multivariate Cox proportional-hazard model was generated in order to find predictive factors independently associated with the time to a CVR. We included 197 patients in the study (136 males; mean age, 43 ± 12 years; 105 patients were NA naïve). Sixty-five patients had hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive CHB. The median duration of TDF treatment was 29 (range, 6 to 52) months. Seventy-one patients (77%) in the LAM-F group were treated with TDF add-on therapy. The CVR rates of the NA-naïve and LAM-F groups were comparable in HBeAg-negative (94% versus 96% at month 36, P = 0.10) and HBeAg-positive patients (67% versus 83% at month 36, P = 0.48). According to the multivariate Cox regression model, only HBeAg positivity (hazard ratio [HR], 0.39; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.26 to 0.59; P < 0.001) and a high baseline HBV DNA level (HR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.29 to 0.67; P < 0.001) had a significant influence on the time to a CVR. The similar cumulative CVR rates during the follow-up show that TDF has comparable efficacy in lamivudine-experienced and NA-naïve patients, and the presence of resistance mutations did not alter the response rates.

Efficacy of lamivudine on acute-on-chronic liver failure in patients with chronic hepatitis B

To observe the therapeutic effects of lamivudine treatment in patients with early- to mid-stage hepatitis B virus-related acute-on-chronic liver failure (HBV-ACLF). Clinical data of 73 hospitalized patients with HBV-ACLF were retrospectively analyzed. Prothrombin time (PT, active coagulation), HBV DNA, and model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score data from treatment weeks 4, 8, 24, and 48 were collected and analyzed using the statistical t-test. During the treatment duration, the complete virologic response rates were 57.5% (42/73) at 4 weeks, 71.0% (44/62) at 8 weeks, 83.1% (49/59) at 24 weeks, and 86.5% (45/52) at 48 weeks. The partial virologic response rates were 30.1% (22/73) at 4 weeks, 25.8% (16/62) at 8 weeks, 17.0% (10/59) at 24 weeks, and 13.5% (7/52) at 48 weeks. At week 48, the survival rate was 71.2% (52/73) and the probability of survival was higher in the complete virological response rate (VRR) group than in the partial VRR group [45/73 (61.6%) vs. 7/73 (30.1%), respectively; P = 0.000]. In addition, there were significant improvements in the serum normalization rate of HBV DNA, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, albumin, total bilirubin, PT and MELD score in surviving patients compared to baseline (P less than 0.05) and in the complete VRR group compared to the partial VRR group (P less than 0.05). Antiviral therapy using lamivudine may be an effective therapeutic option for patients with HBV-ACLF.

Entecavir plus Adefovir Combination Treatment for Chronic Hepatitis B Patients after Failure of Nucleoside/Nucleotide Analogues

The combination of entecavir, a nucleoside analogue, and adefovir, a nucleotide analogue, would be a promising salvage treatment for chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients who fail nucleoside/nucleotide analogue (NA) regimens. A total of 89 CHB patients who had failed NA regimens and were treated with entecavir plus adefovir combination for at least 12 months were included. Mean baseline HBV DNA of patients was 6.16 ±1.44 log(10) IU/ml. Patients were classed by the number of previously failed NAs; 1 NA (lamivudine; n=15; Group 1), 2 NAs (lamivudine and either adefovir or entecavir; n=39; Group 2) and 3 NAs (lamivudine, adefovir and entecavir; n=35; Group 3). After 12 months of treatment, the mean reduction in HBV DNA was greater in Group 1 than in Group 2 or 3 (-5.81 ±1.71, -3.20 ±1.36 and -2.93 ±1.56 log(10) IU/ml, respectively; P<0.01). The rates of virological response (HBV DNA<2,000 IU/ml) were 100%, 79.5% and 34.3% (P<0.01), and the rates of complete virological response (HBV DNA<60 IU/ml) were 53.3%, 25.6% and 14.3% in Group 1, 2 and 3, respectively (P<0.01) at 12 months. Higher baseline HBV DNA (odds ratio =0.59; P=0.02) and increasing number of previously failed NAs (P<0.01) were independently associated with a lower rate of complete virological response at 12 months. Entecavir plus adefovir combination treatment was effective in achieving virological response in CHB patients after failure of NAs. However, its effect progressively decreased as the number of previously failed NAs increased.

Overlap/Switch to Adefovir Monotherapy for Lamivudine-resistant Patients Who Responded to Combination Therapy: A Pilot Controlled Study

The aim of this study was to investigate the outcome of overlap/switch to adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) monotherapy for chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients with lamivudine (LAM)-resistant HBV, who responded to LAM plus ADV combination therapy. In 29 of 35 LAM-resistant CHB patients, serum HBV-DNA levels decreased to <3.7 log genome equivalent (LGE)/mL at 12 months after LAM plus ADV combination therapy, defined as complete virological response (CVR). The 29 CVR patients were randomly allocated to continuation of combination therapy or switch to ADV monotherapy within 12 months. The cumulative rates of sustained CVR were compared between the two groups. The follow-up duration after randomization was 19.3-36.7 months (median, 28.2 months) for the combination group and 21.0-36.4 months (29.0 months) for the overlap/switch group. The cumulative rate of sustained CVR during the follow-up period was 100% in all patients of both groups. The total medical expenses during follow-up after randomization were median US$20,949 for the combination group and US$16,107 for the overlap/switch group (p=0.012). Overlap/switch to ADV monotherapy sufficiently repressed the replication of LAM-resistant mutants without the development of ADV-resistant mutants. The rate of sustained CVR was not influenced by treatment regimen (continuation of combination therapy or switching to ADV monotherapy), the duration of the overlap period, or patient and virological characteristics. In LAM-resistant CHB patients who achieved CVR to LAM plus ADV combination therapy, CVR was maintained after overlap/switch to ADV monotherapy, suggesting that it could be a useful regimen for such patients.

Clinical usefulness of sequential hepatitis B virus DNA measurement (the roadmap concept) during adefovir treatment in lamivudine-resistant patients

Sequential on-treatment monitoring of hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA levels, known as the roadmap concept, might predict the efficacy of oral therapy with nucleoside/nucleotide analogues among patients naive to this treatment. The goal of this study was to verify the usefulness of the roadmap concept to predict clinical outcomes of adefovir dipivoxil monotherapy in hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive patients with lamivudine resistance. In 231 patients, serum HBeAg, antibody against HBeAg and HBV DNA levels were measured at weeks 12, 24 and 48 of treatment and every 3 months thereafter. Complete (HBV DNA<60 IU/ml by PCR), partial (HBV DNA 60-<2,000 IU/ml) and inadequate (HBV DNA> or =2,000 IU/ml) virological responses at week 24 were observed in 49 (21.2%), 66 (28.6%) and 116 (50.2%) lamivudine-resistant patients, respectively, who were treated with adefovir dipivoxil monotherapy. At final assessment, rates of complete virological response in these groups were 100%, 71.2%, and 22.4%. Of the total 42 virological breakthroughs, 33 (78.6%) and 8 (19.1%) developed in the inadequate and partial response groups, respectively. Among the 91 patients who had HBV DNA<200 IU/ml at week 48, complete virological response and HBeAg seroconversion were finally achieved in 87 (95.6%) and 39 (42.9%) patients, respectively. Of these 91 patients, virological breakthrough and genotype mutations developed in only 4 (4.4%) and 3 (3.3%) patients. The roadmap concept predicted virological response, HBeAg seroconversion and breakthrough (odds ratios 3.68, 9.67 and 0.15, respectively). The roadmap concept is useful for choosing between continuation of adefovir dipivoxil monotherapy or early switching to another therapy, or to suggest additional therapy in patients showing lamivudine resistance.

Efficacy of thymosin ?1 in patients with chronic hepatitis B: A randomized, controlled trial

Thymosin alpha1 (Talpha) is an immune modifier that has been shown in a pilot study to be effective for chronic hepatitis B; this requires confirmation. Ninety-eight patients with clinicopathologically proven chronic hepatitis B were randomly allocated to 3 groups: 1) group A received a 26-week course of Talpha with a 1.6-mg subcutaneous injection two times a week (T6 group); 2) group B received the same regimen as group A, but Talpha therapy extended for 52 weeks (T12 group); and 3) group C served as a control group and was followed up for 18 months without specific treatment (T0 group). The three groups were comparable in clinicohistological features at entry. The complete virological response rate (clearance of serum hepatitis B virus [HBV] DNA and hepatitis B e antigen [HBeAg]) was higher in group A (40.6%) and group B (26.5%) than in group C (9.4%) (group A vs. group C: P=.004; group B vs. group C: P=.068) when assessed 18 months after entry, although complete response rates among these three groups were similar when first assessed at the end of therapy. There was a trend for complete virological response to increase or accumulate gradually after the end of Talpha therapy. None of the responders lost hepatitis B surface antigen. Blinded histological assessment showed a significant improvement in treated patients, particularly in lobular necroinflammation and scores excluding fibrosis. No significant side effects were observed. These results suggest that a 26-week course of Talpha therapy is effective and safe in patients with chronic hepatitis B.

Interferon-??-n1

Interferon-alpha-n1 (lymphoblastoid interferon-alpha) is a nonrecombinant 'natural' interferon derived from lymphoblastoid cells exposed to Sendai virus. In common with endogenous and recombinant interferon-alpha molecules, interferon-alpha-n1 has antiviral, immunomodulatory and antiproliferative properties. Interferon-alpha-n1 shows some efficacy in immunocompetent adults with well-compensated chronic viral hepatitis B. Rates of complete virological response (defined as an absence of detectable hepatitis B virus-DNA in the serum) ranged from 5 to 79% of adults who received various dosage regimens of interferon-alpha-n1 in monotherapy trials. Clearance of hepatitis B 'e' antigen was reported in 5 to 70% of patients treated with the drug. Spontaneous virological responses occurred in 0 to 48% of untreated patients. The clinical efficacy of interferon-alpha-n1 in patients with chronic hepatitis B is not improved by concomitantly administered deflazacort, zidovudine or levamisole, but may be increased by a course of corticosteroid pretreatment in some patients. Interferon-alpha-n1 also shows therapeutic benefit in adults with chronic hepatitis C. Complete biochemical responses (defined as normalisation of serum ALT levels) were achieved in 27 to 60% of adult patients treated with the drug, whereas spontaneous normalisation of serum ALT levels occurred in up to 11% of untreated patients. Responses to interferon-alpha-n1 were temporary in 27 to 78% of treatment responders but were sustained in 6 to 40% of patients. Emerging data delineating baseline factors predictive of a positive response to interferon-alpha-n1 treatment may aid in the selection of patients with hepatitis B or C most likely to benefit from treatment with this drug. Most patients receiving interferon-alpha-n1 experience a transient 'influenza-like' syndrome during the first week of treatment. The syndrome, which is dose related and alleviated by paracetamol (acetaminophen), is characterised by fever, chills, and arthralgia. Dose-limiting adverse effects occurring during longer term interferon-alpha-n1 therapy include fatigue, myalgia, headache, depression, pruritus and seizures. Neutropenia and thrombocytopenia may also occur during interferon-alpha-n1 treatment. Autoimmune thyroid disease may develop in up to 9% of patients treated with interferon-alpha-n1 for >or=6 months. At present, interferon-alpha-n1 and the recombinant forms of interferon-alpha are the only drugs available for the treatment of adults with well-compensated hepatitis B or C. Interferon-alpha-n1 produces moderate response rates in adults with well-compensated chronic hepatitis B or C. Thus, it is positioned alongside recombinant interferon-alpha products as a useful first-line treatment option for patients with chronic hepatitis B or C.