Complete Virological Response Research Articles

Switching to Tenofovir Therapy Versus Continuation of Entecavir for Patients With Hepatitis B Virus Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

ABSTRACTBackgroundHepatitis B virus (HBV) infection causes liver disease, including hepatocellular carcinoma. Controlling viral activity is crucial to reducing complications. Tenofovir may offer benefits over entecavir, but it is unclear if switching from entecavir to tenofovir improves outcomes. This study assesses the clinical impact of switching to tenofovir therapy for chronic HBV infection.MethodsFollowing the PRISMA guidelines, we conducted a literature search within the Cochrane Library, PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus for studies of patients with HBV infection who were switched to tenofovir from entecavir or were maintained on entecavir. Both formulations of tenofovir, that is, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and tenofovir alafenamide were included and analyzed in subgroup analysis. Meta‐analyses were performed with RevMan 5.4 using a random‐effects model, with statistical significance set at p < 0.05.ResultsA total of eight studies, comprising 833 patients, were included in the meta‐analysis. Tenofovir showed a significantly higher likelihood of achieving complete virological response (RR 5.60; 95% CI 3.51–8.94; p < 0.00001) and a greater reduction in HBV DNA levels (MD −1.03 log IU/mL; 95% CI −1.69 to −0.36; p = 0.002) compared to entecavir. However, there was no significant difference in HBsAg reduction or HBeAg seroconversion between the two groups. ALT reductions were not statistically significant overall, although entecavir showed better outcomes in subgroup analysis.ConclusionSwitching from entecavir to tenofovir improves virological response and reduces HBV DNA levels, but shows no significant advantage in HBsAg reduction, HBeAg seroconversion, or overall, ALT reduction.

Efficacy and Safety of Tenofovir Amibufenamide and Tenofovir Alafenamide for First-Time HBV-Related Decompensated Cirrhosis.

Clinical studies of tenofovir amibufenamide (TMF) and tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) treatment in patients with HBV-related decompensated cirrhosis (HBV-DC) are limited. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of TMF versus TAF in naive-treated patients with first-time HBV-DC. Based on the antiviral drug used, patients were categorised into the TMF group and the TAF group. Virological and serological responses, hepatic and renal functions and blood lipid changes in both groups were evaluated during 48 weeks of treatment. A total of 98 patients were enrolled, 45 in the TMF group and 53 in the TAF group. At 48 weeks of treatment, the proportions of patients who achieved complete virological response (CVR) were 85.7% and 90.7%, respectively (p = 0.791). Improvement of at least 2 points in Child-Turcotte-Pugh scores was observed in 64.3% versus 79.1% (p = 0.169) of the patients. There were no significant changes in serum creatinine, estimated glomerular filtration rate or total cholesterol from baseline to week 48 between the two groups. Cystatin C remained stable in the TMF group but increased over time in the TAF group (p < 0.001). Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol remained stable in the TMF group but increased significantly in the TAF group at week 48 (p = 0.015). These results suggest that both TMF and TAF can rapidly suppress HBV replication, improve hepatic function and have no negative effects on renal function among patients with HBV-DC. Regarding lipid metabolism, both showed a better safety, while regular monitoring of blood lipid levels is recommended.

Efficacy and safety of tenofovir amibufenamide in the treatment of patients over 65 years of age with chronic hepatitis B

Objective: To investigate the efficacy and safety of tenofovir amibufenamide in patients over 65 years old with chronic hepatitis B and liver cirrhosis. Methods: We recruited 45 patients in Linyi People's Hospital with chronic hepatitis B and liver cirrhosis who were treated with TMF antiviral therapy for 48 weeks, compared the virologic response rate and HBV DNA decrease level at 12, 24 and 48 weeks, and the changes in hepatitis B surface antigen, alanine aminotransferase, glomerular filtration rate, creatinine, triglycerides, total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, serum phosphorus and blood lipids, and the changes in ALT normalization rate at 48 weeks. P<0.05 was statistically significant. Results: The age of the enrolled patients was 69.0 (67.0, 72.5) years. At 12, 24, and 48 weeks of treatment, the complete virological response rates were 32.4% (12/37), 70.0% (28/40), and 84.6% (33/39) respectively, and the level of HBV DNA decreased from baseline (P＜0.05). After 48 weeks of treatment, the level of HBsAg decreased (P<0.05), and there was no negative HBsAg conversion and seroconversion. After 48 weeks of treatment, the level of ALT decreased (P<0.05). At 48 weeks of treatment, the rates of ALT reverted to normality were 88.9% (16/18) and 70.4% (19/27), respectively. There was no significant difference in the levels of glomerular filtration rate, creatinine, phosphorus, triglycerides, total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol estimated at baseline before and after treatment (P＞0.05), and no serious adverse events were observed. Conclusions: For patients over 65 years old with chronic hepatitis B and liver cirrhosis, TMF can significantly inhibit HBV DNA replication, and the ALT normalization rate is high and well tolerated.

Tenofovir alafenamide versus entecavir in treating patients with chronic hepatitis B: A meta-analysis

BackgroundThe superiority between TAF and ETV remains unclear. Which is the best choice for patients with CHB? Thus, this meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TAF and ETV for patients with CHB. MethodsMEDLINE/PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Web of Science and CNKI were searched for eligible studies from inception to January 2024 and a meta-analysis was done. Results24 trials with a total of 6753 subjects were screened. TAF significantly improved 12- and 24-week complete virological response (CVR), 12-week biochemical response (BR) and 24-week HBeAg loss, but could not improve 48- and 96-week CVR, 24-, 48- and 96-week BR, 96-week HBeAg loss, adverse events, 48-week HBsAg decline and loss, 12-, 24- and 48-week HBeAg seroconversion, 96-week HCC incidence compared to ETV. Subgroup analysis was conducted according to race, research type and switching. Different results were obtained from different subgroups. ConclusionsTAF was superior to ETV at 12- and 24-week CVR, 12-week BR and 24-week HBeAg loss. Race and switching might affect the efficacy of TAF and ETV.

Risk factors related to low-level viraemia in chronic hepatitis B patients receiving entecavir treatment.

About 20% of on-treatment patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) experienced low-level viraemia (LLV), which is associated with persistent low-grade inflammation, fibrosis progression, and increased risk of hepatocellular carcinoma. We aimed to investigate the high-risk factors related to LLV. In this retrospective study, patients receiving entecavir (ETV) treatment from January 2018 to January 2023 were enrolled, and were divided into a LLV (HBV DNA 20-2000 IU/mL) cohort and a complete virological response (CVR) (HBV DNA < 20 IU/mL) cohort according to the virological response at week 48 posttreatment. Treatment baseline characteristics were retrieved from electronic medical records. Multivariate logistic regression was performed. Totally, 1653 patients were enrolled, male patients accounted for 73.0%; the median age was 44 years; the mean HBV DNA level was 5.9 Log10 IU/ml. Among them, 472 (28.6%) experienced LLV. Multivariate analysis showed that HBeAg positivity (OR = 2.650, 95% CI: 2.000-3.511, p < 0.001), HBV DNA ≥ 6.0 Log10 IU/mL (OR = 1.370, 95% CI: 1.054-1.780, p = 0.019), qHBsAg ≥ 9000 IU/mL (OR = 4.472, 95% CI: 3.410-5.866, p < 0.001), cirrhosis (OR = 1.650, 95% CI: 1.234-2.207, P = 0.001), LSM ≥ 13.0 kPa (OR = 1.644, 95% CI: 1.203-2.246, p = 0.002), and PLT < 100×109/L (OR = 1.450, 95% CI: 1.094-1.922, p = 0.010) at baseline were related to the development of LLV. High HBV DNA/HBsAg quantification/LSM, low PLT, HBeAg positivity, and liver cirrhosis were high-risk factors associated with LLV in patients receiving entecavir treatment.

Evaluation of the risk of developing hepatocellular carcinoma in chronic Hepatitis C patients receiving antiviral treatment.

Chronic HC leads to the development of liver cirrhosis (LC) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The treatment of chronic HC with DAAs reduces mortality from LC and HCC.The study aimed to investigate the serological markers specific to HCC (PIVKA-II and AFP) in patients with chronic HC before and after DAA treatment. The study involved 35 HCV patients (mean age: 56.23 ± 1.45) divided into two groups. Group 1 included 15 HCV + HCC patients and Group 2 included 20 HCV non-HCC patients. At the end of treatment all the patients were HCV RNA negative. Three months after the end of antiviral treatment, HCV RNA was undetectable in all patients, while a complete biochemical and virological response was observed in 66.7% of HCV + HCC patients and 85.0% of HCV non-HCC patients. PIVKA-II levels before the initiation of antiviral treatment were high in all patients. At the end of the treatment, in the HCV non-HCC group, normalization of PIVKA-II levels was observed only in 20.0% cases, and in 60.0% of cases 3 months after the treatment. Meanwhile, in patients with HCC and chronic HCV, PIVKA-II levels were within the normal range 3 months after treatment in only 13.3% of patients. It is necessary to monitor HCV patients with cirrhosis (F4) and severe fibrosis (F3) without HCC, who have high PIVKA-II and AFP levels and/or ALT activity despite obtaining sustained virologic response 3 months after treatment with DAAs.

Naif Kronik Hepatit B Tedavisinde Tenofovir Alafenamid: Tek Merkezli Retrospektif Çalışma

Kronik hepatit B (KHB), dünya çapında yaklaşık 257 milyon insanı etkileyen önemli bir küresel sağlık sorunudur. Tenofovir alafenamid (TAF), kronik hepatit B tedavisinde kullanılan yeni ve etkili bir antiviral ilaç olmakla birlikte tedaviye naif hastalarda TAF etkinliğine ilişkin gerçek dünya verileri sınırlıdır. Bu çalışmanın amacı, tedaviye naif KHB hastalarında TAF'ın etkinliğini değerlendirmektir. Virolojik yanıt ve alanin aminotransferaz (ALT) normalizasyonu ile ilişkili faktörler de çalışmada analiz edilmiştir. Çalışmaya Ocak 2021-Aralık 2022 tarihleri arasında TAF başlanan 41 tedavi naif KHB hastası dahil edilmiştir. Demografik, klinik ve laboratuvar verileri başlangıçta ve 48. haftada toplanmıştır. Birincil sonlanım noktaları tam virolojik yanıt (TVY) ve 48. haftada ALT normalizasyonu idi. 48. haftada ALT ve hepatit B virüsü-deoksiribonükleik asit (HBV DNA) düzeyleri istatiksel açıdan anlamlı olacak şekilde azalmıştır (her ikisi de p

The co-existence of NAFLD and CHB is associated with suboptimal viral and biochemical response to CHB antiviral therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background and aimsChronic hepatitis B (CHB) and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) are leading causes of liver-related morbidity and mortality. The interaction between these two disease processes is poorly defined and the impact of NAFLD on HBV-related cirrhosis and HCC remains unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of NAFLD on response to antiviral CHB therapy to inform the debate on changing CHB treatment thresholds for these comorbid patients.MethodsStudies with a minimum of 50 adult CHB patients on nucleoside analogue therapy with or without concurrent NAFLD were identified from PubMed/Medline and EMBASE to February 21, 2023. Data extraction from each study included HBeAg and treatment status, diagnostic method of NAFLD, frequency of monitoring intervals, patient age, gender, grade of hepatic steatosis, BMI and metabolic comorbidities. The outcomes of interest, complete virological response (CVR), biochemical response (BR) and HBeAg loss/seroconversion, were recorded at each available monitoring interval. Comparing CHB-NAFLD and CHB-only groups, pooled odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using random- or fixed-effects models depending on heterogeneity.ResultsFrom a search of 470 citations, we identified 32 potentially relevant papers. Overall, 11 studies, comprising 2580 unique patients, met the inclusion criteria of the meta-analysis. CHB-NAFLD patients exhibited significantly lower rates of CVR compared to CHB-only patients. This was demonstrated by an OR of 0.59 (0.38-0.93, p=0.001, I2 = 72%) at 12 months, which tapered off to an OR of 0.67 (0.48-0.95, p=0.02) at 60 months. CHB-NAFLD patients also exhibited significantly lower rates of BR compared to CHB-only patients, as demonstrated by ORs of 0.39 (0.24-0.62, p&amp;lt;0.0001, I2 = 53%) at 12 months and 0.33 (0.17-0.63, p=0.0008) at 24 months.ConclusionPatients with concurrent CHB and NAFLD experience delayed CVR to antiviral therapy and more persistent biochemical abnormalities in comparison to patients with CHB only. This supports the argument for earlier antiviral therapy in order to avert CHB complications in these multi-morbid patients, as the global disease burden of NAFLD continues to increase.

VIROLOGICAL RESPONSE AND EFFECTIVENESS OF CHEMORADIATION THERAPY FOR ANAL CANCER: RELATIONSHIP AND PREDICTIVE CAPABILITIES

The effectiveness of chemoradiation therapy (CRT) is conventionally assessed in terms of achieving clinical complete response (CCR), overall and event-free survival. Anal cancer (AR) is considered as one of the cancer diseases with a proven etiological agent: the human papillomavirus (HPV). The search for biomarkers to predict the effectiveness of CRT is always relevant, and an assessment of virological response (VR) may be useful for this purpose. Aim: To compare rates of clinical complete response (CCR) and virological response (VR) to CRT for anal cancer.

Sequential or Combination Treatments as Rescue Therapies in Immunocompromised Patients with Persistent SARS-CoV-2 Infection in the Omicron Era: A Case Series.

Prolonged SARS-CoV-2 infections are widely described in immunosuppressed patients, but safe and effective treatment strategies are lacking. We aimed to outline our approach to treating persistent COVID-19 in patients with immunosuppression from different causes. In this case series, we retrospectively enrolled all immunosuppressed patients with persistent SARS-CoV-2 infections treated at our centers between March 2022 and February 2023. Patients received different sequential or combination regimens, including antivirals (remdesivir, nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, or molnupiravir) and/or monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) (tixagevimab/cilgavimab or sotrovimab). The main outcome was a complete virological response (negative SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR on nasopharyngeal swabs) at the end of treatment. Fifteen patients were included as follows: eleven (11/15; 73%) with hematological disease and four (4/15; 27%) with recently diagnosed HIV/AIDS infection. Six patients (6/15; 40%) received a single antiviral course, four patients (4/15; 27%) received an antiviral and mAbs sequentially, and two patients (13%) received three lines of treatment (a sequence of three antivirals or two antivirals and mAbs). A combination of two antivirals or one antiviral plus mAbs was administered in three cases (3/15, 20%). One patient died while still positive for SARS-CoV-2, while fourteen (14/15; 93%) tested negative within 16 days after the end of treatment. The median time to negativization since the last treatment was 2.5 days. Both sequential and combination regimens used in this study demonstrated high efficacy and safety in the high-risk group of immunosuppressed patients.

Real-world study on the efficacy and safety of first-line antiviral therapy for chronic hepatitis B

Objective: To clarify the clinical efficacy of first-line oral antiviral drugs tenofovir alafenamide (TAF), tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF), and entecavir (ETV) in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) and their safety profiles with lipid, bone, and kidney metabolism. Methods: 458 CHB cases diagnosed and treated at the Department of Hepatology of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine of the Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University from February 2010 to November 2022 were selected. TAF (175 cases), TDF (124 cases), and ETV (159 cases) were used as therapies. At 24 and 48 weeks, the virology, biochemical response, changes in liver stiffness measurement (LSM), and bone, kidney, and blood lipid metabolism safety profiles were compared and analyzed. Results: After 24 and 48 weeks of TAF, TDF, and ETV therapy, HBV DNA load decreased by 3.28, 2.69, and 3.14 log10 IU/ml and 3.28, 2.83, and 3.65 log10 IU/ml, respectively, compared with the baseline, and the differences between the three groups were statistically significant, P < 0.001. The complete virological response rates were 73.95%, 66.09%, 67.19%, and 82.22%, 72.48%, and 70.49%, respectively. The incidence rates of low-level viremia were 16.67%, 21.70%, and 23.08%, while poor response rates were 1.11%, 3.67%, and 4.10%. ALT normalization rates were 64.00%, 63.89%, 67.96%, and 85.33%, 80.56%, 78.64%, respectively, and there was no statistically significant difference among the groups. LSM was significantly improved in patients treated with TAF for 48 weeks, P = 0.022. Serum phosphorus level gradually decreased with the prolongation of TDF treatment. The TAF treatment group had a good safety profile for kidney, bone, and phosphorus metabolism, with no dyslipidemia or related occurrences of risk. Conclusion: There are some differences in the therapeutic effects of first-line anti-HBV drugs. TAF has the lowest incidence of low-level viremia after 48 weeks of treatment and has a good safety profile in kidney, bone, and blood lipid metabolism.

Switching from entecavir to tenofovir alafenamide for maintaining complete virological response in chronic hepatitis B.

Hepatocellular carcinoma development can be decreased by achieving and maintaining complete virological response (CVR) in chronic hepatitis B. However, it is unclear whether switching from entecavir (ETV) to tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) could achieve and maintain CVR in patients with low-level viremia (LLV; HBV DNA ≤ 3.3 log IU/mL) or occasional detectable HBV DNA during ETV treatment. Therefore, we aimed to examine whether the switching from ETV to TAF is effective in achieving CVR in patients with LLV or occasional detectable HBV DNA. This study comprised 45 patients who switched from ETV to TAF. All patients received ETV and TAF for >2 years, and the HBV DNA levels were measured every 3 months. Maintaining undetectable HBV DNA during 2-year period is defined as CVR. The primary endpoint is the CVR rate during ETV and TAF treatment. The CVR rate for each of the 2 years of ETV and TAF therapy was 33.3% (15/45) and 68.9% (31/45, P < 0.01), respectively, and the CVR rate increased by switching from ETV to TAF. In patients with occasional detectable HBV DNA during ETV treatment (22 patients), 15 achieved CVR and 7 maintained occasional detectable HBV DNA. In patients with LLV during ETV treatment (eight patients), three achieved CVR and five had occasional detectable HBV DNA. Switching from ETV to TAF increases the CVR rate in patients with LLV or occasional detectable HBV DNA and could be an alternative treatment option.

Long-term health and economic benefits of switching to tenofovir alafenamide versus continuing on entecavir in chronic hepatitis B patients with low-level viremia in Saudi Arabia.

Despite the success of current treatments, many chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients still live with low-level viremia [LLV] resulting in liver disease progression. This study evaluated the long-term health and economic impact of switching to tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) from entecavir (ETV) in Saudi Arabia (SA) in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) LLV patients. A hybrid decision tree Markov state-transition model was developed to simulate a cohort of patients with CHB LLV treated with ETV and switched to TAF over a lifetime horizon in SA. While on treatment, patients either achieved complete virologic response (CVR) or maintained LLV. CVR patients experienced slower progression to advanced liver disease stages as compared to LLV patients. Demographic data, transition probabilities, treatment efficacy, health state costs, and utilities were sourced from published literature. Treatment costs were sourced from publicly available databases. Base case analysis found that over a lifetime horizon, switching to TAF versus remaining on ETV increased the proportion of patients achieving CVR (76% versus 14%, respectively). Switching to TAF versus remaining on ETV resulted in a reduction in cases of compensated cirrhosis (-52%), decompensated cirrhosis (-5%), hepatocellular carcinoma (-22%), liver transplants (-12%), and a 37% reduction in liver-related deaths. Switching to TAF was cost-effective with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $57,222, assuming a willingness-to-pay threshold of three times gross national income per capita [$65,790/QALY]. This model found that switching to TAF versus remaining on ETV in SA CHB LLV patients substantially reduced long-term CHB-related morbidity and mortality and was a cost-effective treatment strategy.

Factors associated with persistent positive in HBV DNA level in patients with chronic Hepatitis B receiving entecavir treatment.

The clinical significance of persistent positive in Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) DNA level in patients receiving antiviral therapy is not well known. We investigated factors associated with persistent viremia (PV) in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) given 78-week entecavir. A total of 394 treatment-naïve CHB patients who had undergone liver biopsy at baseline and week 78 of treatment were analyzed in this prospective multicentre study. We identified patients with PV (above the lower limit of quantification, 20 IU/ml) after 78 weeks of entecavir therapy. Stepwise, forward, multivariate regression analyses of specified baseline parameters were apllied to identify factors associated with PV. Futhermore, we assessed the incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in all patients using models of the risk of HCC development. Of the 394 patients, 90 (22.8%) still with PV after 78-week antiviral treatment. Factors associated significantly with PV (vs complete virological response, CVR) were HBV DNA level ≥8 log10 IU/mL (OR, 3.727; 95% CI, 1.851-7.505; P < 0.001), Anti-HBc level < 3 log10 IU/mL (OR, 2.384; 95% CI, 1.223-4.645; P=0.011), and HBeAg seropositivity (OR, 2.871; 95% CI, 1.563-5.272; P < 0.001). Patients with PV were less likely to have fibrosis progression and HCC development than those with the CVR. Of the 11 HBeAg-positive patients with HBV DNA level ≥8 log10 IU/mL and Anti-HBc level < 3 log10 IU/mL at baseline, 9 (81.8%) had persistent positivity in HBV DNA level and 0 had fibrosis progression at week 78 of treatment. In conclusion, HBV DNA level ≥8 log10 IU/mL, Anti-HBc level < 3 log10 IU/mL and HBeAg seropositivity at baseline contribute to PV in patients with CHB receiving 78-week antiviral treatment. In addition, the rate of fibrosis progression and the risk of HCC development in patients with PV were kept low. The complete protocol for the clinical trial has been registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01962155 and NCT03568578).

Inverse Propensity Score-Weighted Analysis of Entecavir and Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B: A Large-Scale Multicenter Study.

Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) is reportedly superior or at least comparable to entecavir (ETV) in preventing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) among chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients; however, it remains controversial. This study aimed to conduct comprehensive comparisons between the two antivirals. CHB patients initially treated with ETV or TDF between 2012 and 2015 at 20 referral centers in Korea were included. The primary outcome was the cumulative incidence of HCC. The secondary outcomes included death or liver transplantation, liver-related outcome, extrahepatic malignancy, development of cirrhosis, decompensation events, complete virologic response (CVR), seroconversion rate, and safety. Baseline characteristics were balanced using the inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). Overall, 4210 patients were enrolled: 1019 received ETV and 3191 received TDF. During the median follow-ups of 5.6 and 5.5 years, 86 and 232 cases of HCC were confirmed in the ETV and TDF groups, respectively. There was no difference in HCC incidence between the groups both before (p = 0.36) and after IPTW was applied (p = 0.81). Although the incidence of extrahepatic malignancy was significantly higher in the ETV group than in the TDF group before weighting (p = 0.02), no difference was confirmed after IPTW (p = 0.29). The cumulative incidence rates of death or liver transplantation, liver-related outcome, new cirrhosis development, and decompensation events were also comparable in the crude population (p = 0.24-0.91) and in the IPTW-adjusted population (p = 0.39-0.80). Both groups exhibited similar rates of CVR (ETV vs. TDF: 95.1% vs. 95.8%, p = 0.38), and negative conversion of hepatitis B e antigen (41.6% vs. 37.2%, p = 0.09) or surface antigen (2.8% vs. 1.9%, p = 0.10). Compared to the ETV group, more patients in the TDF group changed initial antivirals due to side effects, including decreased kidney function (n = 17), hypophosphatemia (n = 20), and osteoporosis (n = 18). In this large-scale multicenter study, ETV and TDF demonstrated comparable effectiveness across a broad range of outcomes in patients with treatment-naïve CHB during similar follow-up periods.

Ledipasvir/Sofosbuvir Is Effective as Sole Treatment of Porphyria Cutanea Tarda with Chronic Hepatitis C.

Chronic hepatitis C [CHC] is a risk factor for porphyria cutanea tarda [PCT]. To assess whether ledipasvir/sofosbuvir is effective for treating both PCT and CHC, we treated patients with CHC + PCT solely with ledipasvir/sofosbuvir and followed them for at least 1year to assess cure of CHC and remission of PCT. Between September 2017 and May 2020, 15 of 23 screened PCT + CHC patients were eligible and enrolled. All were treated with ledipasvir/sofosbuvir at recommended doses and durations, according to their stage of liver disease. We measured plasma and urinary porphyrins at baseline and monthly for the first 12months and at 16, 20, and 24 mos. We measured serum HCV RNA at baseline, 8-12, and 20-24 mos. Cure of HCV was defined as no detectable serum HCV RNA ≥ 12weeks after the end of treatment (EOT). Remission of PCT was defined clinically as no new blisters or bullae and biochemically as urinary uro- plus hepta-carboxyl porphyrins ≤ 100 mcg/g creatinine. All 15 patients, 13 of whom were men, were infected with HCV genotype 1. 2/15 withdrew or were lost to follow-up. Of the remaining 13, 12 achieved cure of CHC; 1 had complete virological response, followed by relapse of HCV after ledipasvir/sofosbuvir but was subsequently cured by treatment with sofosbuvir/velpatasvir. Of the 12 cured of CHC, all achieved sustained clinical remission of PCT. Ledipasvir/sofosbuvir [and likely other direct-acting antivirals] is an effective treatment for HCV in the presence of PCT and leads to clinical remission of PCT without additional phlebotomy or low-dose hydroxychloroquine treatment. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03118674.

Analysis of efficacy and factors influencing sequential combination therapy with tenofovir alafenamide fumarate after treatment with entecavir in chronic hepatitis B patients with low-level viremia

Objective: To observe the efficacy and factors influencing sequential or combined tenofovir alafenamide fumarate (TAF) after treatment with entecavir (ETV) in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) with low-level viremia (LLV). Methods: 126 CHB cases treated with ETV antiviral therapy in the Department of Infectious Diseases of the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University from January 2020-September 2022 were retrospectively collected. Patients were divided into a complete virologic response (CVR) group (n = 84) and a low-level viremia (LLV) group (n = 42) according to the HBV DNA level during treatment. Clinical characteristics and laboratory indicators of the two groups at baseline and 48 weeks were analyzed by univariate analysis. Patients in the LLV group were divided into three groups according to their continued antiviral treatment regimen until 96 weeks: continued use of ETV as a control group; replacement of TAF as a sequential group; and combination of ETV and TAF as a combined group. The data of the three groups of patients were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance for 48 weeks. HBV DNA negative conversion rate, HBeAg negative conversion rate, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), creatinine (Cr), and liver stiffness test (LSM) were compared among the three groups after 96 weeks of antiviral treatment. Multivariate logistic regression was used to analyze the independent factors influencing the occurrence of HBV DNA non-negative conversion in LLV patients at 96 weeks. Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) was used to evaluate the effectiveness of predicting the occurrence of HBV DNA non-negative conversion in LLV patients at 96 weeks. Kaplan-Meier was used to analyze the cumulative negative rate of DNA in LLV patients, and the Log-Rank test was used for comparison. HBV DNA and HBV DNA negative conversion rates during treatment were observed dynamically. Results: Univariate analysis showed statistically significant differences in age, BMI, HBeAg positivity rate, HBV DNA, HBsAg, ALT, AST, and LSM at baseline between the CVR group and the LLV group (P < 0.05). Univariate analysis of variance revealed no statistically significant difference among the three groups of LLV patients at 48 weeks (P > 0.05). HBV-DNA negative conversion rate in the sequential group and the combination group was significantly higher than that in the control group after 96 weeks of treatment (88.89% vs. 41.18%, 85.71% vs. 41.18%, χ (2) = 10.404, P = 0.006). HBeAg negative conversion rate was higher than that of the control group, with no statistically significant difference (P > 0.05).Compared with the control group, ALT, Cr, and LSM in the sequential group and the combined group were equally improved to varying degrees, with a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05). Subsequent use of ETV and HBV DNA at 48 weeks were independent risk factors for HBV DNA positivity at 96 weeks in LLV patients (P < 0.05). The AUC of HBV DNA at 48 weeks was 0.735 (95%CI: 0.578 ~ 0.891), the cut-off value was 2.63 log(10) IU/ml, and the sensitivity and specificity were 76.90% and 72.40%, respectively. DNA conversion rate was significantly lower in LLV patients receiving 48-week ETV and 48-week HBV DNA≥2.63 log10 IU/mL than in patients receiving sequential or combined TAF and 48-week HBV DNA < 2.63 log(10) IU/mL. HBV DNA negative conversion rates in the sequential group and combined group at 72 weeks, 84 weeks, and 96 weeks were higher than those in the control group during the period from 48 weeks to 96 weeks of continuous treatment, and the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Sequential or combined TAF antiviral therapy could more effectively improve the 96-week CVR rate, as well as hepatic and renal function, and alleviate the degree of hepatic fibrosis in CHB patients with LLV following ETV treatment. Subsequent use of ETV and HBV DNA load at 48 weeks were independent predictors of HBV DNA positivity at 96 weeks in LLV patients.

Prevalence and Associated Factors of Low-Level Viremia in Chronic Hepatitis B Patients After Long-Term Therapy with Nucleos(t)ide Analogs.

Low-level viremia is usually defined as a detectable but lower than 2000 IU/mL hepatitis B virus DNA level after 12 months or longer duration of antiviral therapy in chronic hepatitis B patients. In this study, we aimed to clarify the factors associated with lowlevel viremia in patients during long-term monotherapy with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate or entecavir. Chronic hepatitis B patients having received entecavir or tenofovir disoproxil fumarate treatment for 12 months or more were enrolled from October 2019 to October 2021 at a tertiary hospital in Shanghai, China. In accordance with their hepatitis B virus DNA levels, chronic hepatitis B patients were grouped into 3 categories, hepatitis B virus DNA > 2000 IU/mL, low-level viremia, and complete virological response (hepatitis B virus DNA < 10 IU/mL). Compared with complete virological response patients, factors related to lowlevel viremia were evaluated. This study enrolled a total of 160 chronic hepatitis B patients, whose duration of treatment ranged from 12 to 144 months. In total, 107 patients achieved complete virological response, 51 showed low-level viremia, and 2 showed hepatitis B virus DNA > 2000 IU/mL. After multivariate logistic regression analysis, hepatitis e antigen-positivity (odds ratio = 6.479, 95% CI: 2.480-16.922, P = .000), entecavir treatment (odds ratio = 4.742, 95% CI: 1.855-12.118, P = .001), and duration of therapy (odds ratio = 0.168, 95% CI: 0.072-0.388, P = .000) were independently associated with low-level viremia. Having received long-term antiviral treatment, low-level viremia still occurred in 31.9% of patients. Longer duration of therapy was a protective factor, and HBeAg-positivity and entecavir treatment were risk factors for low-level viremia.

Dynamic changes of cytokine profiles and virological markers during 48 weeks of entecavir treatment for HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B.

ObjectiveThe aims of this study were to investigate the kinetic changes of serum, virological, and immunological markers during entecavir (ETV) antiviral therapy and to explore whether these indicators can predict the antiviral efficacy of ETV in hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients.MethodsHBeAg-positive CHB patients were enrolled and treated with ETV 0.5 mg/day. Clinical biochemical, virological, and serological tests were performed at baseline and every 12 weeks during the 48-week treatment. Plasma levels of cytokines (Flt-3L, IFN-α2, IFN-γ, IL-10, IL-17A, IL-6, TGF-β1, TGF-β2, TGF-β3, and TNF-α) were measured at baseline and at 12 and 24 weeks after treatment. Analysis of the trends of these clinical indicators in ETV antiviral therapy was performed.ResultsA total of 105 HBeAg-positive CHB patients were enrolled, and 100 of them completed 48 weeks of ETV treatment and follow-up. After 48 weeks of treatment, hepatitis B s antigen (HBsAg) decline ≥ 1 log10 was found in seven patients, but no patient achieved HBsAg disappearance. serological HBeAg disappeared in 13 patients, and serological HBeAg transformed in 3 patients. The baseline HBsAg and HBeAg levels, HBV DNA load, IL-10, and TGF-β1 levels in the complete virological response group were lower than those in the incomplete virological response group, while the ALT level in the complete virological response group was higher than that in the incomplete virological response group. Both univariate analysis and multivariate analysis showed that baseline biochemical indexes, virological indexes, and cytokine levels had no correlation with the complete virological response at 48 weeks. In multivariate analysis, low baseline HBV DNA load, and HBeAg and IL-10 levels were significantly associated with ALT normalization after 48 weeks of ETV treatment (HBeAg OR = 1.003, 95% CI 1.001–1.006, p = 0.007; HBV DNA OR = 0.184, 95% CI 0.046–0.739, p = 0.017; IL-10 OR = 0.040, 95% CI 0.972–0.999, p = 0.040).ConclusionCytokine levels changed dynamically during ETV antiviral therapy. Low baseline HBV DNA load, and HBeAg and IL-10 levels were significantly associated with ALT normalization after 48 weeks of ETV treatment.

Does Hepatic Steatosis Influence the Virological Response with Chronic Hepatitis B Patients Treated with Entecavir or Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate?

The effect of hepatic steatosis on the response to antiviral therapy administered in chronic hepatitis B patients is yet to be clarified. In this study, our aim was to determine the effect of hepatic steatosis on the virological response in chronic hepatitis B patients who were treated with entecavir or tenofovir disoproxil fumarate. This retrospective cohort study was performed using the data of liver biopsy-proven chronic hepatitis B patients with or without hepatic steatosis, who received entecavir or tenofovir disoproxil fumarate treatment between 2012 and 2017. The undetectable serum hepatitis B virus deoxyribonucleic acid level under treatment was defined as the complete virological response. The predictors of virological response were determined, and it was checked whether the virological response was affected by hepatic steatosis in chronic hepatitis B patients who have undergone entecavir or tenofovir disoproxil fumarate treatment. A total of 324 chronic hepatitis B patients, of which 203 (63%) were males, were included in the study. The median age of the patients was 42 years (range: 35-51 years). Hepatic steatosis was observed in 25% of the patients, and steatohepatitis in 4%. The median time to complete virological response was found to be 6 months (range: 3-9 months). In the full analysis model, the log hepatitis B virus deoxyribonucleic acid was determined as the factor most associated with virological response (P < .001). No statistically signifi- cant relationship was detected between hepatic steatosis and virological response (P = .409). Concomitant hepatic steatosis has no significant impact on the virological response in chronic hepatitis B patients who have undergone entecavir or tenofovir disoproxil fumarate treatment.