To provide a biomechanical comparison between human dermal (HD) allograft and long head of biceps tendon (LHBT) autograft with and without posterior side-to-side suturing for superior capsule reconstruction. Eight fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulder specimens were tested in 5 conditions: (1) intact, (2) complete supraspinatus tear, (3) LHBT, (4) LHBT with side-to-side suturing, and (5) HD allograft with side-to-side suturing. Functional abduction force, superior translation of humeral head, translational range of motion, and rotational range of motion were tested at 0°, 30°, 60°, and 90° of abduction within each condition. Data were analyzed using analysis of variance with post-hoc Tukey testing for pairwise comparison, with a significance value set at .05. Functional abduction force in the LHBT, LHBT+ suture, and HD+ suture conditions was significantly increased compared with the supraspinatus tear condition at abduction angles of 30° (P= .011, .001, and .017, respectively), 60° (P= .004, .001, and .002, respectively), and 90° (P= .013, .001, and .038, respectively). In addition, superior translation of the humeral head in the LHBT, LHBT+ suture, and HD+ suture conditions was significantly decreased compared with the tear condition at abduction angles of 30° (P= .03, .049, .03, respectively) and 60° (P= .02, .04, .03, respectively). All 3 reconstructive techniques were statistically identical to the intact rotator cuff condition in regard to translational and rotational range of motion. Superior capsule reconstruction with LHBT autograft without side-to-side suturing, LHBT with posterior side-to-side suturing, and HD allograft with posterior side-to-side suturing all equivalently restore functional abduction force and decrease superior translation of the humeral head after a complete supraspinatus tear. Superior capsule reconstruction with long head of the biceps tendon autograft and human dermal allograft both restore functional abduction force and decrease superior translation of the humeral head, while displaying no losses in the range of motion in a cadaveric model.
Read full abstract