Complete Avoidance Of Exposure Research Articles

Monitoring Electromagnetic Radiation Emissions in Buildings and Developing Strategies for Improved Indoor Environmental Quality.

Electronic devices have become ubiquitous in daily life, but they emit electromagnetic radiation, which may have negative health impacts at excessive levels. Little is known regarding the impact of radiation emissions on building occupants or strategies for reducing its intensity. This study applied a novel approach using system analysis to quantify radiation exposure in building spaces, examine building material responses to radiation propagation, and investigate risks to human health in the country of Qatar. Radiation intensity levels varied based on the location and type of building space. Different types of construction materials showed varied responses to electromagnetic field wave propagation. Drywall exhibited the best blocking effect, whereas glass and lumber walls exhibited poor blocking effects. The field strengths quantified in this study are less than the corresponding reference values specified by some jurisdictions, but they are still significantly higher than the safety levels defined in many other countries, which could result in significant health risks. The key strategies for improving indoor environmental quality include the use of shielding materials, spatial design, reduction of exposure time, increased exposure distance, and complete avoidance of exposure in sensitive areas.

Occupational dermatoses from colophony exposure

Colophony is a resin, obtained from pine trees. It has many applications in industry as well as in products for everyday life and exposure is virtually impossible to avoid. In article, we concentrate on occupational exposure, which is frequent in workers in electronics, furniture and paper industry, production of adhesives, plastics, printing ink and synthetic rubber as well as in everyone, daily in contact with products, which contain colophony, or pine wood, like carpenters and woodworkers. Main allergens are oxidation products of abietic-type acids, but cross-reactivity with fragrances, wood resins, Balsam of Peru, wood tar and oil of turpentine is also possible. Exposure to colophony manifests itself on skin in allergic patients mainly as allergic contact dermatitis. The diagnosis is based on history of exposure, clinical presentation and epicutaneous testing. Although the only effective treatment is complete avoidance of exposure, it is difficult to avoid colophony. Consequently, prophylaxis is essential and concentrates on safe working practices, personal hygiene and protection.

Poklicne dermatoze pri izpostavljenosti kolofoniji

Colophony is a resin, obtained from pine trees. It has many applications in industry as well as in products for everyday life and exposure is virtually impossible to avoid. In article, we concentrate on occupational exposure, which is frequent in workers in electronics, furniture and paper industry, production of adhesives, plastics, printing ink and synthetic rubber as well as in everyone, daily in contact with products, which contain colophony, or pine wood, like carpenters and woodworkers. Main allergens are oxidation products of abietic-type acids, but cross-reactivity with fragrances, wood resins, Balsam of Peru, wood tar and oil of turpentine is also possible. Exposure to colophony manifests itself on skin in allergic patients mainly as allergic contact dermatitis. The diagnosis is based on history of exposure, clinical presentation and epicutaneous testing. Although the only effective treatment is complete avoidance of exposure, it is difficult to avoid colophony. Consequently, prophylaxis is essential and concentrates on safe working practices, personal hygiene and protection.

Therapeutic relevance of HRCT findings from a pneumological viewpoint

The high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) technique is an essential component in diagnosing interstitial lung disease (ILD) as it provides important and specialized information and a much greater accuracy than chest X-rays. It contributes to a narrowing down of the differential diagnoses and is also important for planning further invasive investigations, e.g. bronchoscopy, bronchoalveolar lavage, transbronchial lung biopsy and surgical lung biopsy, if needed. An accurate diagnosis of ILD is based on a multidisciplinary discussion involving pulmonologists, radiologists and pathologists experienced in the diagnosis of ILD.The therapy approaches of five different entities of ILD are shown as examples. In hypersensitivity pneumonitis the mainstay of treatment is complete avoidance of exposure to the provoking antigen. In cryptogenic organizing pneumonia most patients recover with corticosteroid therapy with prednisolone over a period of 6 months to 1 year. In cases of sarcoidosis therapy depends on organ involvement and functional impairment but there is no durable benefit to routine treatment of patients with acute pulmonary sarcoidosis, even among those with stage II or III chest radiographs. In general, patients with severe or progressive disease will require treatment.In idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) a confident radiological diagnosis of definitive usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) obviates the need for surgical lung biopsy. Other etiologies of a HRCT pattern of UIP, such as domestic and occupational environmental exposure, connective tissue disease and drug toxicity must be ruled out. In IPF antifibrotic therapy with pirfenidone (approval since 2011) or the triple tyrosine kinase inhibitor nintendanib (pending approval in 2015) can reduce disease progression but therapy with acetylcysteine alone or in combination with prednisolone and azathioprine failed to meet efficacy endpoints. In the management of scleroderma associated ILD rapid semiquantitative evaluation of the extent of the disease on HRCT > 20% is useful for identifying patients who require treatment.

What is the optimal management option for occupational asthma?

The optimal management of occupational asthma remains uncertain in clinical practice. The aim of this review was to analyse the published information pertaining to the management of occupational asthma in order to produce evidence-based statements and recommendations. A systematic literature search was conducted up to March 2010 to identify original studies addressing the following different treatment options: 1) persistence of exposure; 2) pharmacological treatment; 3) complete avoidance of exposure; 4) reduction of exposure; and 5) the use of personal protective equipment. After full text evaluation of 83 potentially relevant articles, 52 studies were retained for analysis. The conclusions from this systematic review are limited by the methodological weaknesses of most published studies. Critical analysis of available evidence indicates that: 1) persistent exposure to the causal agent is more likely to result in asthma worsening than complete avoidance; 2) there is insufficient evidence to determine whether pharmacological treatment can alter the course of asthma in subjects who remain exposed; 3) avoidance of exposure leads to recovery of asthma in less than one-third of affected workers; 4) reduction of exposure seems to be less beneficial than complete avoidance of exposure; and 5) personal respiratory equipment does not provide complete protection.

Management of occupational asthma: cessation or reduction of exposure? A systematic review of available evidence

Reduction of exposure to sensitising agents causing occupational asthma has been proposed as an alternative to total avoidance in order to minimise the adverse socio-economic impact of the condition. The aim of this systematic review was to compare the effects of these two management options on asthma and socio-economic outcomes. A bibliographic search was conducted to identify studies examining the outcome of workers with occupational asthma after reduction or cessation of exposure to the causal agent. The changes in asthma symptoms and nonspecific bronchial hyperresponsiveness after reduction or cessation of exposure were described in nine and five studies, respectively. The meta-analysis of pooled data showed that a reduction of exposure was associated with a lower likelihood of improvement (OR 0.16, 95% CI 0.03-0.91) and recovery (OR 0.30, 95% CI 0.11-0.84) of asthma symptoms and a higher risk of worsening of the symptoms (OR 10.23, 95% CI 2.97-35.28) and nonspecific bronchial hyperresponsiveness (OR 5.65, 95% CI 1.11-28.82), compared with complete avoidance of exposure. This systematic review indicates that reduction of exposure cannot be routinely recommended as an alternative to cessation of exposure in the management of occupational asthma. However, further investigations are required before drawing evidence-based conclusions on the cost-effectiveness of this approach.

L’asthme aggravé par le travail : est-ce un asthme professionnel ?

Work-aggravated asthma is a common disease. Like occupational asthma, it reflects inadequate work conditions and requires preventive measures. Both work-aggravated asthma and occupational asthma share the same severe socioeconomic outcomes. On an individual level, however, efforts should be made to distinguish work-aggravated asthma from occupational asthma, for medicolegal reasons but also for medical reasons. Whereas complete avoidance of exposure is the best treatment for occupational asthma, it seems less imperious for work-aggravated asthma. Specific inhalation challenge is the best diagnostic tool to differentiate occupational asthma from work-aggravated asthma, but this test is available in only a few specialized centres. Analysis of induced sputum together with peak expiratory flow monitoring is an interesting alternative.