Most patients initiating anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapy for CLL have a disruptive infusion reaction that can cause serious complications and be fatal. A better understanding of the risk factors and etiology of infusion reactions is required to improve preventative measures and management. We report a study to test the hypothesis that IV rituximab induces an inflammatory cytokines response with differences in individual cytokine concentrations correlating with infusion reactions. We designed a clinical trial (NCT03788291) for initial treatment of patients with progressive CLL that provided clinical data and blood specimens from 37 patients treated with 50 mg of IV rituximab infused at 25 mg/h. Blood specimens were collected immediately prior to initiation of rituximab (baseline), one hour later (1h), at the end of the infusion (post-infusion) and at 48 h after initiation of therapy (48h). Infusion reactions (CTCAE grade ≥2 events) were managed by interrupting the infusion and initiating symptomatic treatment. We measured circulating CLL cell counts and CD20 levels, and serum rituximab concentration, complement levels, and cytokine concentrations of IFN-γ, IL-10, IL-18, IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, IP-10, MCP-1, MIP-1α, MIP-1β, and TNF-α using standard methods. Twenty-four (65%) patients had 25 infusion reactions (all CTCAE grade 2) at a median of 78 minutes (range 35-128) after initiation of rituximab therapy (median dose 32 mg, range 15-50). All patients completed the 50 mg rituximab infusion (median time 150 minutes, range 119-195). Patient and CLL characteristics including baseline CLL cell counts did not predict the risk of infusion reactions. Median CLL counts at 1h decreased to 14.7% of baseline with no further changes post-infusion and no significant difference between patients with or without infusion reactions (60x109/L vs. 45x109/L, p=0.61). Median CLL cell membrane CD20 levels (x103 molecules/cell) decreased from 4.77 at baseline to 3.10 at 1h (p=0.002) and 1.59 post-infusion (p<0.0001 vs. baseline and 1h) with no significant differences between patients with or without an infusion reaction. The median estimated number of circulating CLL cell membrane CD20 molecules (x1012 molecules/L) decreased from 325.8 at baseline to 34.1 at 1h (p<0.0001) and 14.5 post-infusion (p<0.0001 vs. baseline, p<0.03 vs. 1h) with no significant differences between patients with or without an infusion reaction. There was no correlation between risk of infusion reaction and serum levels of rituximab or serum complement. Thirty-five (95%) patients had a ≥4 fold increase in serum concentration of ≥1 cytokine with resolution of the cytokine response at 48h. All patients with an infusion reaction had significantly higher median post-infusion serum concentrations of IP-10, IL-6 and IL-8. All 17 patients with IP-10 serum concentrations above the limit of detection (40,000 pg/ml) post-infusion had an infusion reaction, and all 24 patients with an infusion reaction had a ≥4 fold increase in serum IP-10 concentrations. Of 13 patients without an infusion reaction, the highest measured serum IP-10 concentration was 22,013 pg/ml and only 3 (23%) had ≥4 fold increases in serum IP-10 concentrations. Slow infusion of a reduced dose of rituximab induced a cytokine response in 95% of patients and therapy disrupting infusion reactions occurred at a comparable rate (65%) to standard rituximab therapy. Infusion reactions were associated with increased levels of IP-10, IL-6 and IL-8. IP-10 levels were increased by ≥4 fold in all patients with an infusion reaction compared to 23% without an infusion reaction. These data suggest that rituximab infusion reactions are caused by inflammatory cytokines produced by cytotoxic effector cells activated by rituximab independent of the pre-treatment amount of circulating CLL cells or CD20 levels, or efficacy of rituximab in reducing the circulating CLL cell count. Infusion reactions occurred after at least 35 minutes of therapy concurrent with a rapid decrease in circulating CLL cells. This observation suggests that cytokine release could be a result of activation of effector cells responsible for CLL cell elimination. Our data provides novel insights into the potential mechanism of infusion reactions and could form the basis of further research to determine methods to control this clinically important and therapy limiting complication.