Compensatory Cognitive Training Intervention Research Articles

84 Preferred Compensatory Cognitive Training Strategies Among Older Adults with Mild Cognitive Difficulties

Objective:Older adults experiencing mild cognitive difficulties (MCD) may benefit from compensatory cognitive training (CCT) to address cognitive changes. CCT can be delivered over various lengths of time and can focus on a specific cognitive domain (e.g., memory) or multiple domains. Identifying the most relevant and impactful portions of a CCT intervention could allow for more effective and streamlined delivery of compensatory strategies, perhaps allowing this type of training to be included in feedback sessions or brief interventions. This study sought to investigate which factors older adults with MCD found to be most beneficial and applicable to their daily lives after completion of a brief telehealth CCT program.Participants and Methods:Adults age 55+ with documented MCD (n=28) and an optional care partner (CP; n=18) were recruited for video-chat delivery of a 6-week, motivationally-enhanced CCT program adapted from CogSMART. The six weeks included content addressing: Education and Lifestyle Strategies (Session 1); Organization, Prioritization, and Prospective Memory (Session 2); Attention, Concentration, and Working Memory (Session 3); Learning and Memory (Session 4); Executive Functions: Decision-Making, Problem-Solving, and Planning (Session 5); and Skills Integration and Next Steps (Session 6). After completing the course, participants (n=25) provided open-ended feedback on course content, including the areas they found most helpful. They were also asked which strategies from the course they had successfully applied in their daily lives, and which they expected to continue using following the course. Qualitative data were coded and analyzed by two researchers.Results:Participants most often endorsed strategies from Session 2 (44% of participants) and Session 3 (44%) as being helpful and applicable in daily life. Session 1 content was also frequently endorsed (36%). Content from Session 5 was noted to have been helpful/applicable least often (12%). Participants also reported having found common factors of the program to be helpful (35%), such as interaction with the clinician, education on relevant resources, or greater self-reflection and self-awareness through the program. A minority of participants reported “all” (22%) or “none” (24%) of the content to be helpful.Conclusions:Among older adults with MCD, strategies related to prospective memory (e.g., calendar training) and attention (e.g., mindfulness) were most frequently reported as being helpful and applicable in daily life. Participants reported confidence in their ability to continue using these strategies after the program, along with continued implementation of lifestyle factors to promote healthy brain aging (e.g., exercise). Clinicians interested in providing CCT to older adults with MCD may find the most benefit from emphasizing and prioritizing strategies within these domains. Future research could use ecological momentary assessment techniques to gather real-time measures of how these learned strategies are employed in daily life. Continued exploration of the most salient and effective compensatory strategies for older adults with MCD will support effective intervention and promote independence among aging patients.

P516. Compensatory Cognitive Training (CCT) Among Latinx Youth at Clinical High-Risk (CHR) for Psychosis: An Analysis of the Feasibility of a Collaborative United States and Mexico Randomized Controlled Trial (Progresar)

Individuals at clinical high-risk (CHR) for psychosis experience significant neurocognitive and functional deficits. Compensatory Cognitive Training (CCT), a manualized treatment, targets these deficits by teaching cognitive strategies to compensate for deficits associated with psychosis. Importantly, there is a dearth of psychosocial treatments for CHR minority youth. Latinx populations comprise the largest minority group in California, indicating a need to explore the feasibility and cultural adaptability of a CCT intervention in both the United States and Mexico.

Reducing negative symptoms in schizophrenia: Feasibility and acceptability of a combined cognitive-behavioral social skills training and compensatory cognitive training intervention

The current study examined the feasibility and acceptability of an integrated Cognitive-Behavioral Social Skills Training and Compensatory Cognitive Training (CBSST-CCT) intervention compared with Goal-Focused Supportive Contact (SC) in a pilot randomized controlled trial for people with schizophrenia with high negative symptom severity. The sample included 55 participants from five community settings; masters-level study clinicians delivered interventions on-site. Participants completed assessments of cognitive, functional, and psychiatric symptoms at baseline, mid-treatment, post-treatment (12.5 weeks), and 6-month follow-up. Enrollment goals were not initially met, necessitating the addition of a fifth site; however, all groups and assessments were completed on-site. Study procedures were acceptable, as evidenced by 100% enrollment and completion of baseline assessments following informed consent; however, over 1/3rd of participants dropped out. No modifications were necessary to the intervention procedures and CBSST-CCT fidelity ratings were acceptable. The intervention was deemed acceptable among participants who attended ≥1 session, as evidenced by similar attendance rates in CBSST-CCT compared to SC. Among CBSST-CCT participants, lower positive symptoms were significantly associated with better attendance. Overall, we found mixed evidence for the feasibility and acceptability of the CBSST-CCT protocol in people with schizophrenia with high negative symptoms. Challenges are highlighted and recommendations for future investigations are provided.

Predictors of Intervention Adherence in Compensatory Cognitive Training for Veterans With a History of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.

The purpose of this study was to determine modifiable predictors of intervention adherence in a study of group-based Compensatory Cognitive Training (CCT) for Iraq/Afghanistan War veterans with a history of mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). One hundred twenty-three veterans enrolled in a randomized controlled trial of a 10-week CCT intervention (54 assigned to CCT) and were evaluated at baseline, 5 weeks, 10 weeks, and 15 weeks. CCT adherence was determined by the number of CCT sessions attended, with more sessions indicative of greater adherence. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics, and subjective and objective neuropsychological performance, were examined in relation to CCT session attendance. Older age and worse attention performance at baseline were associated with higher CCT attendance rates. This study generates preliminary evidence for potential modifiable neuropsychological factors that may improve engagement in CCT interventions.

Effects of compensatory cognitive training intervention for breast cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy: a pilot study.

Numerous breast cancer patients experience cognitive changes during and after chemotherapy. Chemotherapy-related cognitive impairment can significantly affect quality of life. This pilot study attempted to determine the effects of a compensatory cognitive training on the objective and subjective cognitive functioning of breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy. Fifty-four patients were assigned to either a compensatory cognitive training or waitlist condition. They were assessed at baseline (T1), the completion of the 12-week intervention (T2), and 6months after intervention completion (T3). Outcomes were assessed using the standardized neuropsychological tests and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Cognitive Function (FACT-Cog), version 3. Raw data were converted to T-scores based on baseline scores, and a repeated-measures ANCOVA, adjusting for age, intelligence, depression, and treatment, was used for analysis. The effect sizes for differences in means were calculated. The intervention group improved significantly over time compared to the waitlist group on objective cognitive function. Among ten individual neuropsychological measures, immediate memory, delayed memory, verbal fluency in category, and verbal fluency in letter showed significant group × time interaction. In subjective cognitive function, scores of the waitlist group significantly decrease over time on perceived cognitive impairments, in contrast to those of the intervention group. The 12-week compensatory cognitive training significantly improved the objective and subjective cognitive functioning of breast cancer patients. Because this was a pilot study, further research using a larger sample and longer follow-up durations is necessary.

Cognitive Symptom Management and Rehabilitation Therapy (CogSMART) for veterans with traumatic brain injury: pilot randomized controlled trial.

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) can result in cognitive impairments and persistent postconcussive symptoms that limit functional recovery, including return to work. We evaluated a 12 wk compensatory cognitive training intervention (Cognitive Symptom Management and Rehabilitation Therapy [CogSMART]) in the context of supported employment for Veterans with mild to moderate TBI. Participants were randomly assigned to receive 12 wk of supported employment plus CogSMART or enhanced supported employment that controlled for therapist attention (control). CogSMART sessions were delivered by the employment specialist and included psychoeducation regarding TBI; strategies to improve sleep, fatigue, headaches, and tension; and compensatory cognitive strategies in the domains of prospective memory, attention, learning and memory, and executive functioning. Compared with controls, those assigned to supported employment plus CogSMART demonstrated significant reductions in postconcussive symptoms (Cohen d = 0.97) and improvements in prospective memory functioning (Cohen d = 0.72). Effect sizes favoring CogSMART for posttraumatic stress disorder symptom severity, depressive symptom severity, and attainment of competitive work within 14 wk were in the small to medium range (Cohen d = 0.35-0.49). Those who received CogSMART rated the intervention highly. Results suggest that adding CogSMART to supported employment may improve postconcussive symptoms and prospective memory. These effects, as well as smaller effects on psychiatric symptoms and ability to return to work, warrant replication in a larger trial.

Compensatory Cognitive Training for Psychosis

Treatments for the cognitive impairments of schizophrenia are urgently needed. We developed and tested a 12-week, group-based, manualized, compensatory cognitive training intervention targeting prospective memory, attention, learning/memory, and executive functioning. The intervention focused on compensatory strategies, such as calendar use, self-talk, note taking, and a 6-step problem-solving method, and did not require computers. In a randomized controlled trial, 69 outpatients with DSM-IV primary psychotic disorders were assigned to receive standard pharmacotherapy alone or compensatory cognitive training + standard pharmacotherapy for 12 weeks. Assessments of neuropsychological performance and functional capacity (primary outcomes) and psychiatric symptom severity, quality of life, social skills performance, cognitive insight, and self-reported everyday functioning (secondary outcomes) were administered at baseline, posttreatment, and 3-month follow-up. Data were collected between September 2003 and August 2009. Hierarchical linear modeling analyses demonstrated significant compensatory cognitive training-associated effects on attention at follow-up (P = .049), verbal memory at posttreatment and follow-up (P values ≤ .039), and functional capacity (University of California, San Diego Performance-based Skills Assessment) at follow-up (P = .004). The compensatory cognitive training group also differentially improved in negative symptom severity at posttreatment and follow-up (P values ≤ .025) and subjective quality of life at follow-up (P = .002). Compensatory cognitive training, a low-tech, brief intervention, has the potential to improve not only cognitive performance but also functional skills, negative symptoms, and self-rated quality of life in people with psychosis. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01521026.

Clinical and Cognitive Insight in a Compensatory Cognitive Training Intervention

The impact of limited insight is a crucial consideration in the treatment of individuals with psychiatric illness. In the context of psychosis, both clinical and cognitive insight have been described. This study aimed to evaluate the relationships between clinical and cognitive insight and neuropsychological functioning, psychiatric symptom severity, and everyday functioning in patients with a primary psychotic disorder participating in a compensatory cognitive training (CT) intervention. Sixty-nine individuals diagnosed with a primary psychotic disorder were randomized to a 3-month CT intervention or to standard pharmacotherapy, and they completed a comprehensive neuropsychological, clinical, and functional battery at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months. The CT intervention focused on habit formation and compensatory strategy learning in four domains: prospective memory, attention and vigilance, learning and memory, and problem-solving/cognitive flexibility. At baseline, better clinical insight was significantly related to better executive functioning and less severe negative symptoms. There was no significant association between cognitive insight and cognitive functioning, symptom severity, or everyday functioning ability. The CT intervention did not have an effect on clinical or cognitive insight, but better cognitive insight prior to participation in CT significantly predicted decreased positive and depressive symptom severity posttreatment, and better clinical insight predicted improved self-reported quality of life. Although clinical insight is related to executive functioning, the correlates of cognitive insight remain elusive. Intact insight appears to be beneficial in ameliorating clinical symptomatology like positive symptoms and depression, rather than augmenting cognition. It may be valuable to develop brief interventions aimed at improving clinical and cognitive insight prior to other psychosocial rehabilitation in order to maximize the benefit of treatment.

Development and Pilot Testing of a Novel Compensatory Cognitive Training Intervention for People with Psychosis

The cognitive deficits of schizophrenia have a profound impact on everyday functioning and level of community integration for affected individuals. Cognitive training (CT) interventions may help improve these impairments. We developed and pilot tested a 12-week, group based CT intervention that focused on compensatory strategies and habit learning. Participants were randomly assigned to CT plus standard pharmacotherapy or standard pharmacotherapy (SP) alone and were assessed at baseline, three months (i.e., post-intervention), and at six months. Effect sizes were calculated comparing change in the CT group with change in the SP group. CT had medium to large positive effects on attention, learning, memory, executive functioning, functional capacity, negative symptoms, and subjective quality of life. Most effects became stronger at follow-up, but the effect on negative symptoms was not maintained. Immediately post-treatment, compared with SP subjects, CT participants reported fewer cognitive problems and greater use of cognitive strategies; many of these effects were maintained, but were generally weaker, at six-month follow-up. The initial effect sizes for this compensatory CT intervention suggest that it holds promise for improving cognitive performance, functional capacity, negative symptoms, and quality of life. It is proposed that CT emphasizing habit learning may result in long term changes in ability to function independently in the community.