Comparison Of Proton Pump Inhibitors Research Articles

The Role of Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress in Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Symptoms and Treatment.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease is a common condition worldwide. There is no curative treatment for gastroesophageal reflux disease. Endoplasmic reticulum stress leads to the activation of the unfolded protein response and has an important role in inflammation. The aim is to determine the role of endoplasmic reticulum stress in the follow-up of individuals with gastroesophageal reflux disease and the temporal changes of endoplasmic reticulum stress markers with treatment. Twenty-four subjects in total were recruited prospectively, of whom 15 had nonerosive reflux disease. Two biopsies from 2 cm above the esophagogastric junction, 2 biopsies from gastric antrum mucosa, and 2 biopsies from gastric corpus mucosa were taken. Simultaneously, 2 tubes of venous blood samples were drawn from each individual (1 tube for studying the genetic markers and 1 tube for analyzing the CYP2C19 polymorphism). The mean age was 42.3 ± 17.6 for women and 34.66 ± 11.2 for men. Pantoprazole, esomeprazole, rabeprazole, and lansoprazole preparations were used for treatment. There was no significant difference between tissue and blood samples for panel genes ATF-6, XBP-1, DDIT-3, DNAJC-10, and EIF-2-AK before treatment. There was a significant decrease in the level of ATF-6, XBP-1, DNAJC-9, EIF2-AK, and NF-2L-2 genes in blood after treatment. In the comparison of proton pump inhibitors, significant decreases in the expression of the ATF-6, XBP-1, and DNAJC-9 mRNAs were detected in blood from individuals after treatment. Endoplasmic reticulum stress can be for evaluating the clinical improvement and the effectiveness of treatment in gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Comparison of proton pump inhibitors and histamine 2 receptor antagonists for stress ulcer prophylaxis in the intensive care unit

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), followed by histamine 2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs), are the most commonly used drugs to prevent gastrointestinal bleeding in critically ill patients through stress ulcer prophylaxis. The relative efficacy and drug-related adverse events of PPIs and H2RAs remain unclear. In this retrospective, observational, comparative cohort study, PPIs and H2RAs for stress ulcer prophylaxis in critically ill patients were compared using a common data model. After propensity matching, 935 patients from each treatment group (PPI or H2RA) were selected. The PPI group had a significantly higher 90-day mortality than the H2RA group (relative risk: 1.28; P = 0.01). However, no significant inter-group differences in the risk of clinically important gastrointestinal bleeding were observed. Moreover, there were no significant differences between the groups concerning the risk of pneumonia or Clostridioides difficile infection, which are known potential adverse events related to these drugs. Subgroup analysis of patients with high disease severity were consistent with those of the total propensity score-matched population. These findings do not support the current recommendations, which prefer PPIs for gastrointestinal bleeding prophylaxis in the intensive care unit.

Enantioselective disposition of omeprazole, pantoprazole, and lansoprazole in a same Brazilian subjects group

This work reports the result of the enantioselective disposition of pantoprazole, omeprazole, and lansoprazole in a same group of Brazilian health subjects. Ten nongenotyped healthy subjects were used for this study. Each subject received a single oral dose of 80 mg of pantoprazole, 40 mg of omeprazole, and 30 mg of lansoprazole, and the plasma concentrations of the enantiomers were measured for 8 h postdose. For pantoprazole and omeprazole, among the 10 volunteers investigated, only one volunteer (Subject # 4) presented higher plasma concentrations of the (+)-enantiomer than those of (-)-enantiomer. Nevertheless, the area under the concentration-time curve of the (+)-lansoprazole was higher than those the (-)-lansoprazole for all subjects. The comparison of proton pump inhibitors' enantiomers disposition from a single group volunteer demonstrated that pantoprazole and omeprazole can be used to differentiate extensive from poor CYP2C19 metabolizer while lansoprazole cannot do it.

Pharmacokinetic comparison of proton pump inhibitors

Pharmacokinetic comparison of proton pump inhibitors

Pathogenesis and treatment of acid peptic disorders: comparison of proton pump inhibitors with other antiulcer agents

Acid peptic disorders, including gastric ulcers, duodenal ulcers, and gastro-esophageal reflux disease, are commonly occurring conditions with high direct and indirect costs. The pathogenesis of these disorders involves an imbalance between acid secretion and gastric mucosal defenses. Pharmacologic treatment of acid peptic disorders has focused on correcting this imbalance by either improving mucosal defenses with drugs such as sucralfate, bismuth, and prostaglandin analogs, neutralizing acid with antacids, or decreasing acid secretion with histamine 2 (H 2)-receptor antagonists, or, more recently, proton pump inhibitors. Proton pump inhibitors are more potent inhibitors of acid secretion than H 2-receptor antagonis ts. In clinical comparisons, proton pump inhibitors were shown to be more effective in the treatment of acid peptic disorders than H 2-receptor antagonists. Helicobacter pylori infection is a factor in 85% to 100% of duodenal ulcers and 70% to 90% of gastric ulcers; eradicating this organism results in a considerable decrease in the recurrence of ulcers. Current management of peptic ulcer disease includes the use of combination antisecretory and antibiotic therapy for acute treatment of H pylori-associated disease. Patient self-medication with over-the-counter products, including H 2-receptor antagonists, may have an impact on the potential for reducing the recurrence of peptic ulcer disease in patients with H pylori infection. Patients with recurrent disease should be informed of the need to seek medical treatment through aggressive education at the point of sale for over-the-counter drugs.