Comparison Of Grip Strength Research Articles

Comparison of grip strength between professional spin and pace bowlers

Comparison of grip strength between professional spin and pace bowlers

Comparison of Grip Strength, Forearm Muscle Activity, and Shock Transmission between the Forehand Stroke Technique of Experienced and Recreational Tennis Players Using a Novel Wearable Device.

Upper limb tennis injuries are primarily chronic, resulting from repetitive overuse. We developed a wearable device which simultaneously measures risk factors (grip strength, forearm muscle activity, and vibrational data) associated with elbow tendinopathy development resulting from tennis players' technique. We tested the device on experienced (n = 18) and recreational (n = 22) tennis players hitting forehand cross-court at both flat and topspin spin levels under realistic playing conditions. Using statistical parametric mapping analysis, our results showed that all players showed a similar level of grip strength at impact, regardless of spin level, and the grip strength at impact did not influence the percentage of impact shock transfer to the wrist and elbow. Experienced players hitting with topspin exhibited the highest ball spin rotation, low-to-high swing path brushing action, and shock transfer to the wrist and elbow compared to the results obtained while hitting the ball flat, or when compared to the results obtained from recreational players. Recreational players exhibited significantly higher extensor activity during most of the follow through phase compared to the experienced players for both spin levels, potentially putting them at greater risk for developing lateral elbow tendinopathy. We successfully demonstrated that wearable technologies can be used to measure risk factors associated with elbow injury development in tennis players under realistic playing conditions.

Assessment of Rheumatoid Hand Function as a Characteristic Feature of Rheumatoid Arthritis in Patients Treated with Methotrexate or Methotrexate with Biological Agents with or without Deformation of Hands.

The hand is an excellent work tool that provides the functional ability to mechanical work. The hand is affected in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients, it is a significant problem in the functional sphere as a result of deformities, the grasping function limitation and muscle strength. The aim of the study was the assessment of grip strength, endurance and manipulation abilities of rheumatoid hands with or without deformities treated with methotrexate (MTX) or MTX plus biologics (MTX+BIO). The study involved 80 RA women, (40 received MTX+BIO, 40 MTX), treated at the Rheumatology Department of the Central Clinical Hospital of Interior Affairs in Warsaw. VASpain, DAS28, SDAI, HAQ, HAQ hands, estimation of hand grip strength, endurance, and manipulation ability were analyzed. In group MTX+BIO, values of DAS28 (3.7±1.3 vs. 4.3±1.2, p=0.019), HAQ (0.72 ± 0.57 vs. 1.08± 0.87, p=0.011) and HAQ-hand (0.85±0.65 vs. 1.19±0.68, p=0.024) were statistically lower than in MTX group. Hand deformations were recorded in 35 (43.7%) cases, 16 (40%) in MTX group, 19 (47.5%) in MTX+BIO. Comparison of grip strength, endurance, and manipulation ability showed better results in MTX+BIO group with deformities (significance level from 0.013 to 0.046) than in MTX group. Relative differences in hand function in MTX + BIO group ranged from 10.8% (maximal power grip strength) to 127.6% (minimal hand endurance), after disease duration adjustment - from 28.2% (maximal power grip strength) to 148.4% (minimal hand endurance). Measuring grip strength, hand endurance, manipulation abilities are useful in RA patients with hand deformities.

Comparison of Grip Strength, Gait Speed, and Quality of Life Among Obese, Overweight, and Nonobese Older Adults

Introduction: Obesity is related to a high risk of chronic diseases and increased rate of morbidity. This study was performed to compare grip strength, gait speed, and quality of life among obese, overweight, and nonobese older adult women. Methods: The study population consisted of 62 older adult women older than 65 years. The subjects were classified according to body mass index (BMI) as obese (BMI ≥25 kg/m2; n = 25), overweight (BMI 23-24.9 kg/m2; n = 13), or nonobese (BMI 18.5-22.9 kg/m2; n = 24). Grip strength and gait speed were measured, and quality of life was determined according to the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) questionnaire. One-way analysis of variance with Bonferroni's post hoc analysis was used to analyze the differences in grip strength, gait speed, and SF-36 score among the 3 groups. Results: There were significant differences in grip strength (F = 8.053, P = .001) and gait speed (F = 4.850, P = .011), but not in the physical (F = 2.194, P = .121) and mental (F = 1.247, P = .295) composite of the SF-36, among the 3 groups. The obese group showed significantly lower grip strength and slow gait speed compared with the overweight and nonobese groups. Conclusions: Obesity in older women has a negative impact on grip strength and gait speed. Grip strength and gait speed reflect health status in older adults, and the findings presented here suggest that grip strength and gait speed should be considered for obesity management in older women.

Comparison of Grip Strength in Recreational Climbers and Non-Climbing Athletes-A Cross-Sectional Study.

In recent years, climbing sports is on the rise making its Olympic debut in 2021. Physiological traits of professional rock climbers have been intensively studied, while recreational indoor climbers are less investigated, especially regarding grip strength and upper extremity proportions. In this cross-sectional study, we aimed to understand what discerns the recreational climber from disparate recreational athletes. Therefore, we analyzed 50 recreational climbing (30.3 ± 12.7 years, 1.76 ± 0.09 m and 67.0 ± 14.0 kg) and 50 non-climbing athletes (26.4 ± 9.1 years, 1.78 ± 0.09 m and 73.2 ± 12.6 kg) to detect differences in their finger grip strength of seven different pinches. In addition, the upper extremity proportions were measured. Even in recreational climbers, almost all analyzed grips were stronger compared to other athletes (p < 0.05 in all but non-dominant fist, small to moderate effect sizes). Only the grip strength of the whole non-dominant hand was not significantly different (p = 0.17). Interestingly, differences between the dominant and non-dominant hand appeared to be larger in the non-climbing (all p < 0.05, all but one with small effect size) compared to the climbing cohort (pinch I/IV and pinch I/II+III+IV not different and mostly trivial). Circumference measurements showed that 10 cm below the lateral epicondyle, climbers exhibited significantly greater perimeter compared to non-climbing athletes (p < 0.05, small effect size). Our results show that recreational climbers have higher measured grip strength, but less profound differences between the dominant and non-dominant hand.

Comparison of Grip Strength with Elbow Taping and Elbow Brace in Asymtomatic Computer Users

Comparison of Grip Strength with Elbow Taping and Elbow Brace in Asymtomatic Computer Users

Comparison of Grip Strength Among 6 Grip Methods

To measure grip strengths using several methods by serially excluding 1 or 2 phalanges using a flexion-block orthosis and comparing those with standard grip posture in order to facilitate prediction of clinical or functional outcomes that relate to the contribution of each finger to grip strength. Two hundred healthy men aged 25 to 30 years were included in the survey. Demographic variables were collected, and anthropometric measurements of the forearm and hand were obtained. Grip strength was measured using all fingers, all fingers except the thumb, all fingers except the index finger, all fingers except the middle finger, all fingers except the ring and little fingers, and all fingers except the little finger. The contribution of each finger to the total grip strength was estimated using the weight value concept. Grip strength using all 5 fingers was greatest, and the grip strength without the thumb was the second greatest. Grip strengths without the middle finger and without the ring and little fingers were the lowest. Various degrees of positive correlations between each grip method and 8 anthropometric parameters were found. Contributions of the thumb, index, middle, and ring and little fingers to the grip strength were 17%, 22%, 31%, and 29%, respectively. The middle finger was the most important contributor to grip strength. The next most important was the combination of the ring and little fingers. The present estimated contributions of each finger to grip strength may facilitate prediction of the clinical or functional outcomes of various pathological conditions.

Simulated Distal Interphalangeal Joint Fusion of the Index and Middle Fingers in 0° and 20° of Flexion: A Comparison of Grip Strength and Dexterity

To evaluate dexterity and grip strength after simulated distal interphalangeal (DIP) joint fusion of the index and middle fingers in varying degrees of flexion. Forty-six right-handed subjects performed grip and dexterity testing using the Grooved Pegboard Test in positions of index finger 20° flexion or full extension, middle finger 20° flexion or full extension, and unrestricted index and middle finger DIP joint motion (control). Simulated fusion was performed with the use of custom-molded thermoplastic orthoses. Index finger dexterity scores were improved when the DIP joint was splinted in 20° compared with full extension. There was no significant difference in the middle finger dexterity when comparing 20° flexion with full extension. In either position, dexterity scores were higher (lower performance) for the index finger than for the middle finger, showing a greater interference to dexterity with splinting the index finger DIP joint. Mean grip strength was unaffected by middle finger DIP joint position, whereas splinting of the index finger in full extension resulted in reduced grip strength. Because positioning the middle finger DIP joint in either extension or 20° of flexion did not significantly affect grip strength or dexterity, other considerations such as appearance can be given priority. For the index finger, however, positioning the DIP joint in 20° of flexion may improve grip strength and dexterity over positioning it in neutral. Prognostic I.

Operative treatment and outcome of unstable distal radial fractures using a palmar T-miniplate at a non-specialized institution.

Treatment options for displaced distal radial fractures are still a controversial topic of discussion. Although good results for the palmar plating of high-volume centers have been published, evidence of its successful use in smaller institutions is still lacking. We report the clinical and radiological results of the treatment for 84 distal radial fractures with a single 2.4-mm T-miniplate in an institution performing <30 procedures per year. According to the AO classification system, there were 30 A, 5 B, and 49 C fractures with a patients mean age of 64 years. After a minimum of 12-month follow-up, we found very good and good results according to the Gardland and Sarmiento scores and a DASH of 5.6. Only five patients were classified as having a moderate outcome. A remaining intra-articular step-off of more than 1 mm was seen in 15 patients. In a comparison of grip strength between the injured and uninjured hands, we saw a difference of 6.8 % less on the injured side. We saw two instances of tendon rupture and one of tendon irritation due to prominent dorsal screws and necessitating revision surgery. Flexor tendon irritation was noted in one patient, requiring a second operation. Modern treatment for distal radial fractures can be performed successfully and with good clinical outcome in smaller institutions. Based on the high and increasing incidence of distal radial fractures, there is no need to transfer these patients into high-volume centers.Level of evidence Case study, Level IV.

Comparison of grip strength and isomeric endurance between the right and left hands of men and their relationship with age and other physical parameters.

Maximum handgrip strength and endurance of fatiguing isometric handgrip muscle contraction at 40% of maximum voluntary contraction of the dominant hand were assessed separately for both right and left hands of 99 right-handed men aged 7-73 years. Subjects below 10 years (n = 6) could not follow up the endurance test methods and were excluded. The relationship of handgrip strength and endurance with age and other physical parameters was also assessed. Maximum grip strength and endurance of fatiguing submaximal contraction of the right hand were significantly greater than that of the left hand for most age groups. Grip strength was positively correlated with age from 7-19 years (r = 0.94 for right and r = 0.89 for left) and was negatively correlated with age from 20-73 years (r = -0.74 right and r = -0.69 left). Grip strength was positively correlated with the weight (r = 0.86 right and r = 0.87 left), height (r = 0.88 right and r = 0.87 left) and body surface area (r = 0.9 for both) of the subjects. Endurance of contraction of both hands did not show any relationship with age, different physical parameters or grip strength of the subjects.

A Comparison of Grip Strength and Selected Psychomotor Performance Measures in Healthy and Frail Elderly Females

Researchers have examined the relationships between strength and psychomotor skills among healthy male subjects far more thoroughly than among female subjects, especially elderly females. The purpose of the present investigation was to compare healthy and frail elderly females on grip strength and psychomotor performance measures. Nineteen healthy elderly females (M = 75.7 years of age) and 20 frail elderly females (M = 80.5 years of age) performed simple aiming movements in order for the investigators to obtain psychomotor measures (e.g., reaction time, movement time, kinematic movement characteristics). In addition, strength measures were obtained in the dominant and nondominant hands. Significant differences were found between elderly females on grip strength and psychomotor performance measures. In general, healthy subjects were stronger and exhibited superior control of movements (e.g., greater impulse, fewer movement adjustments).

Fitness in a U. K. Screening Sample – A Comparison with the Canadian Population

Fitness measurements were compared from approximately 12,000 men and 5,000 women attending the BUPA Health Screening Centre, London, with published Canadian levels. The mean (+/- SD) predicted VO2-max values in the BUPA group were 35.1 (+/- 9.2) and 30.0 (+/- 8.4) ml/kg/min for men and women aged 15-64 years, respectively. These compare with means of 44.1 and 34.3 in men and women of the same age in Canada. A comparison of flexibility measurements showed that in all age groups the BUPA subjects were less flexible than their Canadian counterparts, on average 28.7% and 25.1% lower for men and women, respectively. Comparison of grip strength showed BUPA values to be on average 8.1% lower in men and 9.5% lower in women than the Canadian levels. Analysis of variance showed that the fitness measurements reflect the recorded physical activity in the BUPA sample, and in particular the predicted VO2-max and flexibility exhibit linear relationships with age and exercise levels.