Comparison Of Enalapril Research Articles

Section 14: Managing Patients With Hypertension and Heart Failure

Section 14: Managing Patients With Hypertension and Heart Failure

Section 13: Evaluation and Therapy for Heart Failure in the Setting of Ischemic Heart Disease

Section 13: Evaluation and Therapy for Heart Failure in the Setting of Ischemic Heart Disease

International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: Practice guidelines for management of heart failure in children

Heart failure (HF) in the United States is well recognized as a major public health problem, with over 900,000 hospital admissions annually in the United States, and greater than 250,000 deaths per year. The great majority of heart failure occurs in adults. In children, the scope of the problem is less well defined, but recent data from the Pediatric Cardiomyopathy Registry suggest an annual incidence of 1.13 cases of cardiomyopathy per 100,000 children. 1 While some of this represents asymptomatic disease, the burden of disease overall is nonetheless quite high. In the Pediatric Cardiomyopathy Registry, the majority of children with cardiomyopathy also had HF, with mortality rates of 13.6% at 2 years in dilated forms of cardiomyopathy. The etiology of heart failure differs greatly between children and adults. Children in the Pediatric Cardiomyopathy Registry had a recognizable syndrome or genetic diagnosis in 27% of cases, with an additional 5% of cases due to myocarditis. Furthermore, a large percentage of children with end-stage HF (between 25% and 75%, depending upon the age group) have an underlying diagnosis of congenital heart disease. 2 In contrast to adult patients, ischemic heart disease is rare in children. There is a large, and rapidly growing literature addressing HF treatment for adult patients, with a much smaller literature concerning HF therapy in children. Excellent guidelines for adult patients have recently been published, but given the significant differences between adult and pediatric patients with HF, there is little reason to believe that these guidelines are directly applicable to children. 3 Accordingly, in this document we have attempted to summarize the relevant literature and synthesize management guidelines for children with HF. The document that follows has been prepared in a consensus fashion, with input from pediatric cardiologists at multiple sites throughout the United States and Canada.

Double-blind comparison of enalapril (E), diltiazem ER (D) and their combination (E/D) in stage 1-3 essential hypertension.

Double-blind comparison of enalapril (E), diltiazem ER (D) and their combination (E/D) in stage 1-3 essential hypertension.

Improved survival at 2 years in mild-to-moderate heart failure for enalapril as compared with hydralazine-isosorbide dinitrate

Source Citation Cohn JN, Johnson G, Ziesche S, et al. A comparison of enalapril with hydralazine-isosorbide dinitrate in the treatment of chronic congestive heart failure. N Engl J Med. 1991 Aug 1;...

A Comparison of Enalapril with Hydralazine–Isosorbide Dinitrate in the Treatment of Chronic Congestive Heart Failure

To define better the efficacy of vasodilator therapy in the treatment of chronic congestive heart failure, we compared the effects of hydralazine and isosorbide dinitrate with those of enalapril in 804 men receiving digoxin and diuretic therapy for heart failure. The patients were randomly assigned in a double-blind manner to receive 20 mg of enalapril daily or 300 mg of hydralazine plus 160 mg of isosorbide dinitrate daily. The latter regimen was identical to that used with a similar patient population in the effective-treatment arm of our previous Vasodilator-Heart Failure Trial. Mortality after two years was significantly lower in the enalapril arm (18 percent) than in the hydralazine-isosorbide dinitrate arm (25 percent) (P = 0.016; reduction in mortality, 28.0 percent), and overall mortality tended to be lower (P = 0.08). The lower mortality in the enalapril arm was attributable to a reduction in the incidence of sudden death, and this beneficial effect was more prominent in patients with less severe symptoms (New York Heart Association class I or II). In contrast, body oxygen consumption at peak exercise was increased only by hydralazine-isosorbide dinitrate treatment (P less than 0.05), and left ventricular ejection fraction, which increased with both regimens during the 2 years after randomization, increased more (P less than 0.05) during the first 13 weeks in the hydralazine-isosorbide dinitrate group. The similar two-year mortality in the hydralazine-isosorbide dinitrate arms in our previous Vasodilator-Heart Failure Trial (26 percent) and in the present trial (25 percent), as compared with that in the placebo arm in the previous trial, (34 percent) and the further survival benefit with enalapril in the present trial (18 percent) strengthen the conclusion that vasodilator therapy should be included in the standard treatment for heart failure. The different effects of the two regimens (enalapril and hydralazine-isosorbide dinitrate) on mortality and physiologic end points suggest that the profile of effects might be enhanced if the regimens were used in combination.

Comparison of enalapril and captopril in the management of self-induced water intoxication

A case of severe water intoxication was recently treated with the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, enalapril and captopril. The results of this open drug trial are being reported here

Comparison of enalapril and bendrofluazide for treatment of systemic hypertension

The antihypertensive and biochemical effects of the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor enalapril were compared with those of the thiazide diuretic bendrofluazide. Patients with untreated mild to moderate essential hypertension were entered into a randomized, double-blind; double-dummy, parallel-group study. Blood pressure (BP) decreased significantly (p < 0.001) with either drug therapy: from 172/103 to 147/87 mm Hg (n = 18) with enalapril and from 179/104 to 165/95 mm Hg (n = 22) with bendrofluazide; thus, enalapril produced a greater reduction (p < 0.05) than bendrofluazide. The median dose of enalapril was 20 mg/day (range 10 to 40) and that of bendrofluazide was 5 mg/day (range 2.5 to 10). Both drugs reduced serum sodium levels by small amounts. This was significant only for enalapril (decrease of 1.3 mmol/liter, p < 0.05). Hyponatremia was not seen in any patient. Three patients were withdrawn from each treatment group due to adverse effects, although both drugs were generally well tolerated.

Therapeutic implications of hypertension-induced glomerular injury: Comparison of enalapril and a combination of hydralazine, reserpine, and hydrochlorothiazide in an experimental model

Systemic hypertension does not always reflect concomitant glomerular hypertension. At similar levels of systemic hypertension, glomerular injury occurs only in kidneys that lack protective preglomerular vasoconstriction, which results in glomerular hypertension. indeed, glomerular hypertension and glomerular injury do not develop in rats with spontaneous hypertension that have effective preglomerular vasoconstriction. In the experiments reported herein, the normal adaptive response (afferent arteriolar dilation) to a reduction of one and five-sixths of the renal mass in rats with spontaneous hypertension was examined to ascertain whether that response would expose the remaining nehprons to the injurious effects of high perfusion pressure. In addition, the efficacies of two different antihypertensive regimens were compared. Rats with spontaneous hypertension received either no therapy, or a combination of hydralazine, reserpine, and hydrochlorothiazide, or the angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor enalapril. Three weeks after ablation of one and five-sixths of the renal mass, blood pressure, glomerular filtration rate, urinary protein excretion, and histologic injury scores for mesangial expansion and glomerulosclerosis were determined. Untreated rats with hypertension had severe glomerulosclerosis and mesangial expansion. Both antihypertensive regimens normalized systemic blood pressure and reduced glomerulosclerosis. However, enalapril was more effective than the combination of hydralazine, reserpine, and hydrochlorothiazide in reducing the exaggerated glomerular filtration rate (0.52 ± 0.40 versus 0.82 ± 0.10 ml perminute; p <0.05), the injury score for mesangial expansion (79 versus 103; p <0.05), and the degree of proteinuria (32 ± 4 versus 42 ± 3 mg per 24 hours; p <0.05). Persistence of hyperfiltration accompanied by increased mesangial expansion, may lead to progression of glomerular damage despite “adequate” control of systemic hypertension, as observed in rats treated with a combination of hydralazine, reserpine, and hydrochlorothiazide.