Compare Health Care Utilization Research Articles

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Pediatric Atopic Dermatitis.

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is one of the most common chronic childhood conditions. Disparities in treatment and access to care can result in poor disease control and decreased quality of life. The aim of this study was to determine whether race and ethnicity affect treatment and healthcare utilization for pediatric atopic dermatitis in central Florida. This study of 4008 children with AD compared healthcare utilization and management using the numbers of AD-related healthcare visits, prescriptions, testing, and subspecialty referrals. Multivariable models were used to compare racial and ethnic groups (Black, Hispanic, Asian, and Other) with the reference group of non-Hispanic White, while adjusting for common confounders. The mean number of urgent care visits for the Hispanic group was 1.61 times that of the non-Hispanic White group, and the mean number of emergency department visits was 3.71 (P < 0.001) times the reference group. Black or African American patients had a mean number of emergency department visits that was 1.52 times that of non-Hispanic White patients (P = 0.021). The mean count of primary care visits was lower among Hispanic patients and higher among Asian patients (P = 0.012). Visits to subspecialty clinics and hospitalizations did not differ significantly. There were no consistent patterns in differences of AD-related prescriptions, testing, or subspecialty referrals. This study indicates that racial and ethnic disparities exist in healthcare utilization in pediatric AD. The underlying factors contributing to these disparities need to be further studied and addressed to reach health equity within pediatric AD.

Health care utilization up to 11years after diagnosis among patients with a hematologic malignancy and its association with socioeconomic position.

To investigate health care utilization among patients with hematologic malignancies and its association with socioeconomic position (SEP) and compare health care utilization with a cancer-free population. Patients with aggressive lymphoma, indolent lymphoma, or multiple myeloma (MM), diagnosed between 1999-2010 and 2015-2019, participated in longitudinal patient-reported outcome research, up to 11years post-diagnosis. Questionnaires assessed health care utilization at the general practitioner (GP), medical specialist, and additional health care. SEP was based on education and income, categorized as low, medium, or high. Sociodemographic and clinical data were obtained from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Mixed models and logistic regression analyses were performed. The study included 2319 patients (71% response rate), who completed on average five measurements. Patients with MM reported the highest health care utilization, both at the GP and medical specialist. Low SEP was associated with higher utilization at the GP (medium education β = - 0.72, p = 0.01; high education β = - 1.15, p < 0.001) and lower utilization of additional physical (OR = 1.7, p = 0.01) and psychosocial (OR = 1.5, p < 0.05) care, among all patients. For patients with MM, high SEP was also associated with higher utilization of health care at the medical specialist (high education β = 2.56, p < 0.05). Hematologic malignancy-related and SEP-related disparities in health care utilization were observed. To ensure equal access to health consumption, attention is needed for patients with a low SEP to provide better guidance in their cancer (survivorship) care. Improving health literacy and involving informal caregivers and nurse-led patient navigation may help reduce disparities in access to (additional) health care.

Health Services Use for SARS-CoV-2-Infected Children With Croup or Bronchiolitis.

Croup and bronchiolitis are common reasons for hospitalization in children, and the role of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection on utilization outcomes for these conditions is not well understood. To compare health care utilization including the rates of hospitalization, readmission, length of stay, and ICU admission for croup and bronchiolitis in children with and without evidence of concurrent SARS-CoV-2 infection over the pandemic period. This retrospective cohort study used inpatient and outpatient electronic health record data from PEDSnet institutions to examine health services use for children aged 30 days to 14 years with SARS-CoV-2 infection and diagnosed with croup or bronchiolitis. The time frame (March 2020-May 2022) was divided into predelta, delta, and omicron variant periods. Multivariable mixed effects logistic and log gamma regression models were used to calculate adjusted odds ratios for factors linked to utilization outcomes for children with versus without SARS-CoV-2 infections. Disease burden was described by variant time period. Across all time periods, among subjects with croup and bronchiolitis, 9.65% of croup patients and 3.92% of bronchiolitis patients were SARS-CoV-2-positive. The omicron variant period had the highest number of SARS-CoV-2 cases for both croup and bronchiolitis. After controlling for patient-level variables and hospital variability, we found no statistically significant differences in utilization outcomes comparing children with and without SARS-CoV-2. Pediatric patients with croup and bronchiolitis and positive SARS-CoV-2 polymerase chain reaction testing did not exhibit a significant increase in hospital and ICU admissions, which may have implications for future staffing models and public health recommendations.

Comparison of Healthcare Utilization in Patients with Multiple Myeloma (MM) and Lymphoma Undergoing Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT)

Comparison of Healthcare Utilization in Patients with Multiple Myeloma (MM) and Lymphoma Undergoing Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT)

A Comparison of Parent-Reported Severe Autism With Mild/Moderate Autism Among US Children.

An expert commission has proposed the term "profound" autism for children on the spectrum who are minimally verbal or nonverbal and have intellectual disability (ID), behavioral challenges, and co-occurring conditions. It is unknown whether parents' rating of "severe" autism aligns with the definition of "profound" autism. Using the National Survey of Children's Health, we sought to (1) estimate the prevalence of parent-reported severe autism, (2) identify child characteristics that are associated with severe autism, (3) compare health care utilization, and (4) compare caregiver stress and resilience between families of children with severe versus mild/moderate autism. Parent responses on the 2018 to 2019 NSCH were used to compare school-age children with parent-reported severe autism and those with mild/moderate autism. Descriptive statistics, χ 2 tests, and logistic regression were used for statistical analysis. Among parents of 1,368 US children with autism, 10.1% characterized their child's autism as severe, a prevalence of 1 in 333. Parents of children with severe autism were more likely to report ID (45% vs 12.1%, p < 0.001), language delay (88% vs 58.7%, p < 0.001), and difficulties in dressing and bathing (67% vs 19.2%, p < 0.001). Children with severe autism had more behavioral problems and co-occurring conditions but were no more likely to see specialists or receive autism-specific behavioral therapy. Their caregivers reported more stress and less resilience. The characteristics of "profound" autism and parent-reported "severe" autism significantly overlap, allowing the use of the NSCH for studies of this vulnerable population. Children with profound/severe autism could benefit from more behavioral therapy, specialty care, and family support.

Quality of care for dual eligible beneficiaries in the oncology care model.

Dual eligible beneficiaries are a vulnerable population who often experience inferior access to care and outcomes compared to non-dual eligible beneficiaries. The Oncology Care Model (OCM) is an alternative payment model that aims to improve coordination and quality of care in beneficiaries receiving chemotherapy and thus may improve care for dual eligible beneficiaries with cancer. We used 100% Medicare claims data from 2014 through 2019 and included beneficiaries with bladder, breast, esophageal, colorectal, kidney, lung, pancreatic, or prostate cancer receiving chemotherapy. We constructed multivariable difference-in-differences regression models to evaluate the effect of OCM participation on healthcare utilization and quality of care at the end-of-life among dual eligible beneficiaries. We also compared healthcare utilization and quality of care outcomes to non-dual eligible beneficiaries. We identified 3,043,944 episodes of care among 1,260,892 unique Medicare beneficiaries. Ten percent of all beneficiaries (n = 126,758) were dual eligible and 64,087 (22%) of episodes among dual eligible patients were in an OCM participating practice. We noted no effect of OCM participation on healthcare utilization or end-of-life quality of care for dual eligible beneficiaries. However, we observed higher rates of hospitalization, emergency department visits, intensive care unit stays, and a lower number of office visits among dual eligible beneficiaries compared to non-dual eligible beneficiaries. Participation in OCM was not associated with improvements in quality of care or healthcare utilization for dual eligible beneficiaries. Dual eligible beneficiaries experience lower quality of care across several measures compared to non-dual eligible beneficiaries. Focused policies and incentives may be necessary to address disparities within emerging health reforms.

Health care resource utilization in Medicare beneficiaries obtaining medication synchronization

BackgroundAn appointment-based medication synchronization (ABMS) is a service whuch aligns patients’ chronic medications to a predetermined routine pickup date and includes a comprehensive medication review or other clinical appointment at the pharmacy. Objective(s)We compared healthcare utilization outcomes (outpatient, inpatient, emergency department visits, and pharmacy utilization) of Medicare beneficiaries enrolled in a med-sync program to beneficiaries not enrolled in such a program. MethodsThis retrospective cohort study included Medicare beneficiaries obtaining medications from pharmacies providing ABMS. All Medicare inpatient, outpatient, emergency, and pharmacy claims data from 2014 to 2016 obtained from the Research Data Assistance Center. These pharmacy claims were used to create med-sync (n = 13,193) and non–med-sync cohorts (n = 156,987). All patients were followed longitudinally for 12 months before and after a 2015 index or enrollment date. Baseline characteristics were used to create a logistic regression model for propensity score matching. A 1:1 greedy nearest neighbor matching algorithm was adapted for sequentially matching both cohorts. Difference in differences (DID) was used to compare mean changes in health care utilization outcomes (outpatient, inpatient, ED visits, and pharmacy utilization) between cohorts. ResultsAfter matching, 13,193 beneficiaries in each cohort were used for analysis. DIDs for mean of health care utilizations were statistically significantly lower in the med-sync cohort than the non–med-sync cohort for outpatient visits (DID 0.012, P = 0.0073) and pharmacy utilization (DID 0.013, P < 0.0001). There was not a statistically significant DID for inpatient and ED visits between cohorts. ConclusionOutpatient and pharmacy utilization changes were statistically significantly lower in the med-sync cohort than the non–med-sync cohort in the 12 months after enrollment. Lower pharmacy utilization could be caused by reducing duplicate prescriptions during synchronized refills or optimization of therapy during medication reviews if patients are enrolled in appointment-based model med-sync.

A comparison of healthcare utilization and outcomes following skin vs. serum-specific IgE allergy testing

Objective To compare the cost, healthcare utilization, and outcomes between skin and serum-specific IgE (sIgE) allergy testing. Methods This retrospective cohort study used IBM® MarketScan claims data, from which commercially insured individuals who initiated allergy testing between January 1 and December 31, 2018 with at least 12 months of enrollment data before and after index testing date were included. Cost of allergy testing per patient was estimated by testing pattern: skin only, sIgE only, or both. Multivariable linear regression was used to compare healthcare utilization and outcomes, including office visits, allergy and asthma-related prescriptions, and emergency department (ED) and urgent care (UC) visits between skin and sIgE testing at 1-year post testing (α = 0.05). Results The cohort included 168,862 patients, with a mean (SD) age of 30.8 (19.5) years; 100,666 (59.7%) were female. Over half of patients (56.4%, n = 95,179) had skin only testing, followed by 57,291 patients with sIgE only testing and 16,212 patients with both testing. The average cost of allergy testing per person in the first year was $430 (95% CI $426–433) in patients with skin only testing, $187 (95% CI $183–190) in patients with sIgE only testing, and $532 (95% CI $522–542) in patients with both testing. At 1-year follow-up post testing, there were slight increases in allergy and asthma-related prescriptions, and notable decreases in ED visits by 17.0–17.4% and in UC visits by 10.9–12.6% for all groups (all p < 0.01). Patients with sIgE-only testing had 3.2 fewer allergist/immunologist visits than patients with skin-only testing at 1-year follow-up (p < 0.001). Their healthcare utilization and outcomes were otherwise comparable. Conclusions Allergy testing, regardless of the testing method used, is associated with decreases in ED and UC visits at 1-year follow-up. sIgE allergy testing is associated with lower testing cost and fewer allergist/immunologist visits, compared to skin testing.

Differences in healthcare utilization between enrollees of fully integrated dual eligible special needs plans versus non-fully integrated plans.

Policymakers advocate care integration models to enhance Medicare and Medicaid service coordination for dually eligible individuals. One rapidly expanding model is the fully integrated dual eligible (FIDE) plan, a sub-type of the dual eligible special needs plan (D-SNP) in which a parent insurer manages Medicare and Medicaid spending for dually eligible individuals. We examined healthcare utilization differences among dually eligible individuals aged 65 years or older enrolled in D-SNPs by plan type (FIDE vs non-FIDE). Using 2018 Medicare Advantage encounters and Medicaid claims of FIDE and non-FIDE enrollees in six states (AZ, CA, FL, NY, TN, WI), we compared healthcare utilization between plan types, adjusting for enrollee characteristics and county indicators. We applied propensity score weighting to address differences between FIDE and non-FIDE plan enrollees. In our main analysis, which included all dually eligible individuals in our sample, we observed no significant difference in healthcare utilization between FIDE and non-FIDE plan enrollees. However, we identified some differences in healthcare utilization between FIDE and non-FIDE plan enrollees in subgroup analyses. For example, among home and community-based service (HCBS) users, FIDE plan enrollees had 6.0 fewer hospitalizations per 1000 person-months (95% CI: -7.9, -4.0) and were 7.0 percentage points more likely to be discharged to home (95% CI: 2.6, 11.5) after hospitalization, compared to non-FIDE plan enrollees. While we found no differences in healthcare utilization between FIDE and non-FIDE plan enrollees when considering all dually eligible individuals in our sample, some differences emerged when focusing on subgroups. For example, HCBS users with FIDE plans had fewer hospitalizations and were more likely to be discharged to their home following hospitalization, compared to HCBS users with non-FIDE plans. These findings suggest that FIDE plans may improve care coordination for specific subsets of dually eligible individuals.

Risk Factors and Outcomes Associated with Gaps in Care in Children with Congenital Heart Disease.

Adults with congenital heart disease (CHD) benefit from cardiology follow-up at recommended intervals of ≤ 2years. However, benefit for children is less clear given limited studies and unclear current guidelines. We hypothesize there are identifiable risks for gaps in cardiology follow-up in children with CHD and that gaps in follow-up are associated with differences in healthcare utilization. Our cohort included children < 10years old with CHD and a healthcare encounter from 2008 to 2013 at one of four North Carolina (NC) hospitals. We assessed associations between cardiology follow-up and demographics, lesion severity, healthcare access, and educational isolation (EI). We compared healthcare utilization based on follow-up. Overall, 60.4% of 6,969 children received cardiology follow-up within 2years of initial encounter, including 53.1%, 58.1%, and 79.0% of those with valve, shunt, and severe lesions, respectively. Factors associated with gaps in care included increased drive time to a cardiology clinic (Hazard Ratio (HR) 0.92/15-min increase), EI (HR 0.94/0.2-unit increase), lesion severity (HR 0.48 for shunt/valve vs severe), and older age (HR 0.95/month if < 1year old and 0.94/year if > 1year old; p < 0.05). Children with a care gap subsequently had more emergency department (ED) visits (Rate Ratio (RR) 1.59) and fewer inpatient encounters and procedures (RR 0.51, 0.35; p < 0.05). We found novel factors associated with gaps in care for cardiology follow-up in children with CHD and altered health care utilization with a gap. Our findings demonstrate a need to mitigate healthcare barriers and generate clear cardiology follow-up guidelines for children with CHD.

DECREASED HEALTHCARE UTILIZATION IN UNINSURED PATIENTS WITH PERIANAL CROHN’S DISEASE UNDERGOING PROCTECTOMY

Abstract INTRODUCTION Perianal Crohn's disease (CD) is a debilitating subtype affecting nearly 20% of CD patients, primarily characterized by the presence of perianal fistulas. It is associated with poor health outcomes, significantly decreased quality of life, and is an independent predictor of work disability. Proctectomy is generally reserved for patients with severe, refractory disease. Social determinants of health, including health insurance status, can impact the progression and outcomes of chronic diseases. Here we examine healthcare utilization and clinical characteristics of patients with perianal CD who undergo proctectomy for those with and without health insurance. METHODS This retrospective study follows perianal CD patients who underwent a proctectomy from 2008 to 2021 at Mount Sinai Hospital. We collected demographic, insurance status, and clinical data, such as diagnosis-to-surgery time, hospitalization rates, number of MRIs utilized, and number of medications utilized (Tables 1 and 2). Univariate analysis comparing patients with and without insurance was performed using Chi-Square or Fisher's Exact Tests. RESULTS Our study included 130 patients (50.8% female) with a mean age of 52.0 ± 14.9 years. The majority were insured (n = 106, 81.5%). Results were significant for a shorter diagnosis-to-surgery time in the uninsured group (6.9 vs. 11.1 years, p = 0.050), fewer hospitalizations (p = 0.002), MRIs (p = 0.008), clinic visits (p = 0.007), as well as reduced use of antibiotics (p = 0.016), and biologics (p =0.001) in the uninsured group (Tables 1 and 2). Data trended towards a later mean age at the time of diagnosis in the uninsured group (37.8 vs. 33.1 years, p=0.241). There was no statistical difference between the groups regarding race, comorbidities, extraintestinal manifestations, presence of skin tags, strictures, and fissures, presence of proctitis or abscess at proctectomy, age at proctectomy, surgical approach, number of lifetime GI surgeries, endoscopies, or corticosteroid treatments. DISCUSSION Our findings suggest that the uninsured patients with perianal CD have decreased utilization of healthcare resources compared to the insured group. This disparity, combined with the observed trend of older age at, and therefore likely delay of, CD diagnosis and treatment may contribute to a more rapid and severe CD course, ultimately leading to a shorter diagnosis-to-surgery interval. This study was limited by a small, single-center population sample, as well as other confounding factors associated with lack of insurance. Future research will include multivariate analysis to identify specific discrepancies in annual healthcare utilization between these populations, evaluate the contribution of race and language to this issue, and investigate the role that a decreased delay in diagnosis could play in preventing last resort proctectomy. Table 1 Patient Characteristics Table 2 Comparison of Healthcare Utilization by Insurance Status

Comparison of Health Care Utilization in Different Usual Sources of Care Among Older People With Cardiovascular Disease in China: Evidence From the Study on Global Ageing and Adult Health.

Objectives: To compare the health care utilization in different usual sources of care (USCs) among the elderly population with cardiovascular disease in China. Methods: Cross-sectional data for 3,340 participants aged ≥50years with cardiovascular disease from Global AGEing and Adult Health (2010)-China were used. Using the inverse probability of treatment weighting on the propensity score with survey weighting, combined with negative binomial regression and logistic regression models, the correlation between USCs and health care utilization was assessed. Results: Patients using primary care facilities as their USC had fewer hospital admissions (IRR = 0.507, 95% CI = 0.413, 0.623) but more unmet health needs (OR = 1.657, 95% CI = 1.108, 2.478) than those using public hospitals. Patients using public clinics as their USC had higher outpatient visits (IRR = 2.188, 95% CI = 1.630, 2.939) than the private clinics' group. Conclusion: The difference in inpatient care utilization and unmet health care needs between public hospitals and primary care facilities, and the difference in outpatient care utilization between public and private clinics were significant. Using primary care facilities as USCs, particularly public ones, appeared to increase care accessibility, but it still should be strengthened to better address patients' health care needs.

Differences in Health Care Utilization of High-Need and High-Cost Patients of Federally Funded Health Centers Versus Other Primary Care Providers.

Primary care providers (PCP) differ in their ability to address the needs and reduce use of costly services among complex Medicaid beneficiaries. Among PCPs, Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA)-funded health centers (HCs) are shown to provide high-value care. We compared health care utilization of complex Medicaid managed care beneficiaries whose PCPs were HCs versus 3 other groups. Cross-sectional study using propensity score matching comparing health care use by provider type, controlling for demographics, health status, and other covariates. California Medicaid administrative data for complex adult managed care beneficiaries with at least 1 primary care visit in 2018. Primary and specialty care evaluation & management visits and services; emergency department (ED) visits; and hospitalizations. PCPs included HCs, clinics not funded by HRSA, solo, and group practice providers. HRSA-funded HCs had lower predicted rates of specialty evaluation & management and other services than all others; lower predicted probability of any ED visits than clinics not funded by HRSA [54% (95% CI: 53%-55%) vs. 56% (95% CI: 55%-57%)] and group practice providers [51% (95% CI: 51%-52%) vs. 52% (95% CI: 52%-53%)]; and lower PP of any hospitalizations than solo [20% (95% CI: 19%-20%) vs. 23% (95% CI: 22%-24%)] and group practice providers [21% (95% CI: 20%-21%) vs. 24% (95% CI: 23%-24%)]. Differences in HC care delivery and practices were associated with lower use of specialty, ED, and hospitalization visits compared with other PCPs for complex Medicaid managed care beneficiaries. Understanding the underlying reasons for these utilization differences may promote better outcomes among these patients.

Comparison of Healthcare Utilization Among Dermatology Patients with Delusional Parasitosis, Psychotic Disorders, and Mood Disorders: An Analysis based on Western NY Multi-Payer Claims Data

Comparison of Healthcare Utilization Among Dermatology Patients with Delusional Parasitosis, Psychotic Disorders, and Mood Disorders: An Analysis based on Western NY Multi-Payer Claims Data

Impact and value of olanzapine as part of a 4-drug regimen in patients receiving high emetic risk chemotherapy.

293 Background: The Michigan Oncology Quality Consortium, MOQC, has increased the use of olanzapine as part of a 4-drug antiemetic regimen for high emetic risk chemotherapy in many of its 50 practices across Michigan. The purpose of this project was to estimate the impact of olanzapine prescribing on health care utilization and subsequent savings in healthcare utilization payments in patients with breast cancer on (neo)adjuvant doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC) for breast cancer. Methods: Multipayer claims data were used from the Michigan Value Collaborative (MVC), a collaborative quality initiative of over 100 hospitals and 40 physician organizations with the goal of improving healthcare value. We identified a cohort of female patients with a 90-day episode of care for breast cancer resection between 2016-2021 who received chemotherapy with AC as (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy. Patients were covered by Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan insurance plans or Medicare. Each patient was attributed to one practice using National Provider Identifiers on professional claims. Facility claims were used to identify inpatient admissions and emergency department (ED) visits across the patient’s course of chemotherapy, up to 21 days following final chemotherapy. Practice-level use of olanzapine abstracted by MOQC as part of ASCO’s Quality Oncology Practice Initiative (QOPI™) data collection was used to determine whether each patient's chemotherapy treatment began when the practice had “high” (≥25%) or “low” (&lt;25%) rates of olanzapine use for high emetic risk chemotherapy. We compared healthcare utilization among patients treated by high- vs. low-prescriber practices and calculated the estimated differences in price-standardized payments attributed to olanzapine use. Results: We identified 1,891 total patients attributed to 45 MOQC practices; 922 patients were attributed to 15 practices that eventually became high prescribers. Patients treated by a high olanzapine prescribing practice had significantly lower hospitalization rates (10%) during chemotherapy compared to patients treated when their attributed practice was a low olanzapine prescriber (15%, p=0.02). There was no difference in the proportion of patients visiting the ED. The mean per-patient price-standardized insurance payment for inpatient hospitalization for this cohort was $12,007. Increased use of olanzapine led to an estimated payment savings of $334,095 in prevented hospitalizations among 525 patients treated when their attributed practice had a high olanzapine prescribing rate. Conclusions: In this patient sample, practice use of olanzapine in ≥ 25% of patients on high emetic risk chemotherapy was associated with significant reductions in the risk of hospitalization. As the proportion of patients receiving olanzapine increases, we expect even greater reductions in the risk of hospitalization and greater cost savings.

SAT109 Diabetic Ketoacidosis Due To Non-medical Switching

Abstract Disclosure: A.S. Can: None. Z. Zhang: None. F. Yeakley: None. Background/Objective: Non-medical switching is a change in treatment regimen for reasons other than efficacy, side effects, or adherence. Non-medical switching aims to decrease health care costs and is initiated by patient’s health insurance company. Case Report: A 20-year-old female with type 1 diabetes mellitus presented with diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA). She was having issues between her health insurance and pharmacy in filling her prescriptions. Both her standing prescription for long-acting (Basaglar, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA) and rapid-acting (Admelog, sanofi-aventis U.S. LLC, Bridgewater, NJ, USA) insulin were no longer covered. The insulin treatment was switched as requested by her health insurance and Semglee (Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc., a Viatris Company, Morgantown, WV, USA) as long-acting and Humalog (Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA) as rapid-acting insulin prescriptions were transmitted to the pharmacy electronically. The patient was confused on what she should be taking. This led to her thinking that her new long-acting insulin (Semglee) was her rapid-acting due to a name that she did not recognize from her past diabetes self-management education. The patient endorsed taking long-acting insulin Semglee three times daily before meals in place of rapid-acting insulin along with previously prescribed long-acting insulin Basaglar twice daily before breakfast and at bedtime. To make things worse, she could not fill her prescription for Semglee due to a Semglee shortage in the preceding three weeks before her admission. Patients with similar health plan were switched to the same insulin at the same time, causing a shortage in our service area. Even if Admelog was prescribed, she was under the impression that she was getting her rapid-acting insulin needs from Semglee. She did not fill her prescription for Admelog. After her discharge, her insurance covered her original regimen (Basaglar and Admelog) that she was on before her non-medical switching. Around the time of admission, wholesale acquisition cost of 5-pack of 3 ml (1500 Units) of Basaglar was $326.36 and unbranded Semglee $147.98 allowing a saving of $0.12 for one unit of insulin. Our patient takes 40 units of long-acting insulin daily, totaling 14600 units per year. Non-medical switching would achieve $1736 savings per year. But inpatient bill for this DKA was $17078. Discussion: In our case, non-medical switching defeated its purpose and increased health care spending. With the switches, patient became confused about her medical regimen. Non-medical switching did not only place additional financial burden but jeopardized patient safety by significantly contributing to an acute complication of diabetes. Further studies that compare health care utilization, not just drug prices are needed to find out if non-medical switching really saves money and is cost-effective. Presentation: Saturday, June 17, 2023

Chronic kidney disease increases cost of care and readmission risk after shoulder arthroplasty

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is associated with adverse outcomes and higher costs after lower extremity arthroplasty from higher rates of infection, aseptic loosening, and transfusion and longer hospital length of stay (LOS). The purpose of this study was to compare health care utilization and 90-day encounter charges after SA in patients with and without renal disease. A secondary aim was to define patient characteristics of patients with renal disease. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all patients who underwent primary shoulder arthroplasty from January 2015 to December 2019 by a single surgeon at a single institution. Patients without a baseline glomerular filtration rate (GFR) were excluded. We evaluated results for patients with CKD (GFR ≤59) and without CKD (GFR ≥60). Univariate regression was performed to assess the influence of CKD on healthcare utilization, including length of stay (LOS), transfusion, and risk for ED revisit or readmission during the 90-day postoperative period. In addition, 90-day encounter charges, revisit charges, and ED charges for patients with CKD were compared with those for patients with normal renal function. Last, multivariable linear regression models were used to assess the effect of eGFR on total 90-day encounter charges. 514 patients met the study inclusion criteria. 125 had CKD, 389 had normal GFR. Patients with CKD were more likely to require transfusion [OR 16.2 (1.9, 139.7), p=0.011] despite similar intraoperative estimated blood loss (156.9±132.5mL versus 153.8±89.7mL, p=0.768). In addition, CKD patients had longer LOS (2.8±1.3 days versus 2.3±1.0 days, p<0.001), had higher 90-day readmission rates (p=0.001), were more likely to visit the ED within 90 days after shoulder arthroplasty (p=0.018), and had higher total 90-day encounter charges ($37,769±$6,901 versus $35,684±$5,312, p=0.001). Each unit increase in eGFR independently reduced total encounter charges by $67 (-$132, -$2, p=0.043); dialysis patients incurred higher total 90-day encounter charges compared to patients with less severe renal disease ($42,733 ± $8,985 v. $37,531± $6,749, p=0.002). Also, patients with CKD were older (73.2±8.9 versus 68.1±9.4 years, p<0.001); had lower preoperative Hg (12.4±1.5g/dL versus 13.4±1.5g/dL; p<0.001), higher ASA score (p<0.001), and more preoperative comorbidities (5.9±2.9 versus 5.0±3.1, p=<0.001); and were more likely to use opioids preoperatively (p=0.043). Patients with CKD have a higher risk for blood transfusion, ED visits, and readmission after shoulder arthroplasty, with higher total 90-day encounter charges. Identifying and optimizing this patient population before surgery can reduce costs and improve outcomes, which benefits patients, physicians, institutions, and payors.

Pediatric Hospitalizations at Rural and Urban Teaching and Nonteaching Hospitals in the US, 2009-2019

National analyses suggest that approximately 1 in 5 US hospitals closed their pediatric units between 2008 and 2018. The extent to which pediatric hospitalizations at general hospitals in rural and urban communities decreased during this period is not well understood. To describe changes in the number and proportion of pediatric hospitalizations and costs at urban teaching, urban nonteaching, and rural hospitals vs freestanding children's hospitals from 2009 to 2019; to estimate the number and proportion of hospitals providing inpatient pediatric care; and to characterize changes in clinical complexity. This study is a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of the 2009, 2012, 2016, and 2019 Kids' Inpatient Database, a nationally representative data set of US pediatric hospitalizations among children younger than 18 years. Data were analyzed from February to June 2023. Pediatric hospitalizations were grouped as birth or nonbirth hospitalizations. Hospitals were categorized as freestanding children's hospitals or as rural, urban nonteaching, or urban teaching general hospitals. The primary outcomes were annual number and proportion of birth and nonbirth hospitalizations and health care costs, changes in the proportion of hospitalizations with complex diagnoses, and estimated number and proportion of hospitals providing pediatric care and associated hospital volumes. Regression analyses were used to compare health care utilization in 2019 vs that in 2009. The data included 23.2 million (95% CI, 22.7-23.6 million) weighted hospitalizations. From 2009 to 2019, estimated national annual pediatric hospitalizations decreased from 6 425 858 to 5 297 882, as birth hospitalizations decreased by 10.6% (95% CI, 6.1%-15.1%) and nonbirth hospitalizations decreased by 28.9% (95% CI, 21.3%-36.5%). Concurrently, hospitalizations with complex chronic disease diagnoses increased by 45.5% (95% CI, 34.6%-56.4%), and hospitalizations with mental health diagnoses increased by 78.0% (95% CI, 61.6%-94.4%). During this period, the most substantial decreases were in nonbirth hospitalizations at rural hospitals (4-fold decrease from 229 263 to 62 729) and urban nonteaching hospitals (6-fold decrease from 581 320 to 92 118). In 2019, birth hospitalizations occurred at 2666 hospitals. Nonbirth pediatric hospitalizations occurred at 3507 hospitals, including 1256 rural hospitals and 843 urban nonteaching hospitals where the median nonbirth hospitalization volumes were fewer than 25 per year. Between 2009 and 2019, the largest decreases in pediatric hospitalizations occurred at rural and urban nonteaching hospitals. Clinical and policy initiatives to support hospitals with low pediatric volumes may be needed to maintain hospital access and pediatric readiness, particularly in rural communities.

Differences in healthcare service utilization between older adults with and without dementia: a cross-sectional study in Shandong, China

Abstract Aim Dementia is characterized by a decline in cognitive functioning and is the main cause of disability, mortality, and care dependence among older adults. This study compared healthcare utilization in older adults with and without dementia and explored factors influencing service use in the former. Subject and methods A total of 8847 seniors (≥ 60 years) were chosen from the Health Service Survey of Shandong Province conducted in 2018. The chi-square test was used for baseline characteristics and healthcare utilization for older adults with and without dementia. Multivariate logistic regression analysed service utilization factors. Results Of the respondents, 261 (3.0%) had dementia. The proportions of respondents who used outpatient care and inpatient care were 40.6% and 76.9%, respectively. The rates of outpatient and inpatient care use among seniors with dementia were slightly higher than those among seniors without dementia (44.8% vs 40.5% and 80.8% vs 76.7%, respectively). Older adults with dementia who were married and had experienced non-communicable diseases within the past 6 months were less likely to use outpatient care. No factors associated with the utilization of inpatient care were found. Conclusion Health publicity and a combination of community care and medical assistance targeting older adults with dementia is essential to increase healthcare service utilization.

A diagnostic subgroup comparison of health care utilization patterns in individuals with eating disorders diagnosed in childhood and/or adolescence.

This study examined a 2-year period after diagnosis of an eating disorder to compare health care utilization in diagnostic subgroups including: anorexia nervosa (AN), bulimia nervosa (BN), binge-eating disorder (BED), avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID), and other specified eating disorders (Other). We conducted a retrospective study of children diagnosed with AN (n = 674), BN (n = 230), BED (n = 59), ARFID (n = 171), and Other (n = 315). We used a general population cohort for comparison, matched 5:1 to the diagnostic subgroups on sex and birth date. We then conducted a separate analysis using the ARFID subgroup as a reference group compared to the other subgroups. Outcomes were determined using data linkage with health administrative databases and included hospitalizations, emergency department, general practitioner, psychiatry, and pediatrician visits. Odds ratios (dichotomous outcomes) and rate ratios (continuous outcome) were calculated. Mental health care utilization was higher for all subgroups compared to the general population. When the subgroups were compared to the ARFID subgroup, those with ARFID appeared to have similar health care utilization to the other subgroups, except when compared to those with AN. The AN subgroup had higher odds of a mental health related hospitalization (OR 1.62, 95% CI 1.04-2.5) higher rates of mental health related pediatrician visits (RR 1.76, 95% CI 1.26-2.46) and psychiatry visits (RR 1.69, 95% CI 1.07-2.68). Those with ARFID have similar utilization as other subtypes of eating disorders, except when compared to those with AN who have higher health care utilization. Our study found that the health service needs of young people with all types of eating disorders are substantially higher than the general population, and it appears that Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder (ARFID) has similar health care utilization to other eating disorders.