Community Reinforcement Approach Research Articles

Engagement, initiation, and retention in medication treatment for opioid use disorder among young adults: A narrative review of challenges and opportunities

IntroductionOpioid Use Disorder (OUD) is a catastrophic public health problem for young adults (YAs) and their families. While medication for OUD (MOUD) is safe, effective, and recognized as the standard of care, its' uptake and success have been limited in YAs compared to older adults. MethodsThis narrative review summarizes the existing literature and highlights select studies regarding barriers to YA MOUD, potential explanations for those barriers, and strategies to overcome them. ResultsBarriers are prominent along the entire cascade of care, including: treatment engagement and entry, MOUD initiation, and MOUD retention. Hypothesized explanations for barriers include: developmental vulnerability, inadequate treatment system capacity, stigma against MOUD, among others. Interventions to address barriers include: promotion of family involvement, increasing provider capacity, integration of MOUD into primary care, assertive outreach, and others. ConclusionsIntegrating an adapted version of family coaching from the Community Reinforcement Approach and Family Training (CRAFT) and other models into YA MOUD treatment serves as an example of an emerging novel practice that holds promise for broadening the funnel of engagement in treatment and initiation of MOUD, and enhancing treatment outcomes. This and other developmentally-informed approaches should be evaluated as part of a high-priority clinical and research agenda for improving OUD treatment for YAs.

It takes a village: A pilot study of a group telehealth intervention for support persons affected by opioid use disorder

IntroductionOpioid use disorder (OUD) has devastating effects on individuals, families, and communities. The Community Reinforcement and Family Training (CRAFT) is a Support Person (SP)-focused intervention that aims to increase SPs' communication strategies, positive reinforcement/rewards, and social support. This pilot study, called eINSPIRE (INtegrating Support Persons Into REcovery), adapted CRAFT for delivery via group telehealth. The aims were to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effectiveness of this intervention on patient buprenorphine retention and SP mental health. MethodsThe study recruited patients receiving buprenorphine treatment in a primary care setting across five community health centers with their SP (N = 100 dyads). SP participants were randomly assigned to receive usual care (UC) or the eINSPIRE intervention. We interviewed Patients and SPs at baseline and three months later. The study collected patient buprenorphine retention data from the electronic medical record three months post-baseline. ResultsAbout 88 % (656/742) of potentially eligible patients were able to nominate a SP and 69 % (100/145) of nominated SPs were eligible and consented to the study. eINSPIRE groups had low reach (25 % of SPs attended), but high exposure (M = 7 of 10 sessions attended) and acceptability (classes helped them with their patient's OUD). The proportion of eINSPIRE patients (68 %) and UC patients (53 %) retained on buprenorphine at follow-up were similar (p = 0.203). SPs in both conditions reported similar reductions in their depression, anxiety, and impairment symptoms. ConclusionsPreliminary data suggest that eINSPIRE groups may not be feasible in primary care without further adaptations for this population. A future study with a larger sample size is needed to elucidate the observed distribution differences in buprenorphine retention. Future research should also explore methods to reduce barriers to SP session attendance to improve the reach of this evidence-based intervention.

Potential factors affecting the impact of community reinforcement and family training. Secondary analysis of an RCT

BackgroundIn addition to increasing the quality of life among concerned significant others (CSOs), Community Reinforcement and Family training (CRAFT) aim at helping CSOs motivate treatment-refusing identified patients (IPs) into treatment through a positive reinforcement process. The aim of the present study was to investigate if the following factors, measured at baseline, have an influence on IP future treatment engagement (1) Type of relation between CSO and the IP (2) The amount of time the CSO spend with the IP (3) if the IP knows that the CSOs seeks help, and (4) The CSO’s own alcohol use.MethodsA secondary analysis from the Danish CRAFT study. CSOs completed a self-administered questionnaire at baseline, after three months, and six months. To investigate the relationship between the four variables and treatment engagement, logistic regression was used.ResultsCSO’s relation to the IP, the frequency of contact between the CSO and the IP, and the CSO’s AUDIT score at the time of the baseline interview were not associated with the IP’s treatment engagement. If CSO at baseline had informed the IP that the CSO participated in CRAFT, odds for IP treatment engagement were significantly higher (adjusted OR [(CI)] = 2.29 [1.13; 4.63] (p < 0.05), relative to if IP not being informed.ConclusionsCRAFT has a higher impact on the likelihood for treatment seeking, if the CSOs inform the IP about his or her own help seeking in order to change the situation. The underlying mechanism behind this is needs further investigations.

Study protocol for the family empowerment program: a randomized waitlist-controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of online Community Reinforcement and Family Training (CRAFT) on the wellbeing of family members with a relative experiencing substance dependence and mental illness

BackgroundSystematic reviews consistently show that family-focused interventions are effective at improving substance treatment engagement and outcomes across the lifespan. Yet, Australian substance use treatment services rarely incorporate family members and concerned significant others. Testing of family focussed interventions in the Australian context is required.MethodsThe trial is a randomized wait-list control trial assessing the effectiveness, feasibility and acceptability of online CRAFT with a parallel group. Participants will be randomised to receive either online CRAFT or to a wait-list control group who are provided with CRAFT related reading material during the waiting period. Outcomes will be assessed at baseline and then at 6- and 15-weeks post baseline. The primary outcome will be improved wellbeing of participating family members. The trial reporting will comply with SPIRIT guidelines.DiscussionThis study will focus on people living in rural areas. Substance treatment programs are limited in rural Australia. The provision of the Family Empowerment Program (CRAFT) online should make family focused substance treatment support accessible and attainable for the first time in rural areas. The outcomes of this trial could have meaningful implications for the future funding and support of family focused substance treatment services that are inclusive of people with mental health conditions.Trial registrationANZCTR, ACTRN12623000796684p, Registered 26 July 2023. Prospectively registered with protocol version 3.

Evaluation of Community Reinforcement and Family Therapy in the UK military community

ABSTRACT Background: Partners and family can play a key role in encouraging military service and ex-service personnel to seek help for their mental health. Community Reinforcement Approach and Family Training (CRAFT) was developed to equip concerned significant others (CSOs) of those experiencing substance use disorders with skills to encourage their loved one to enter treatment and improve their own well-being. It was adapted in the US for CSOs of ex-service personnel with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) (VA-CRAFT). Objective: This study aimed to evaluate an adaptation of VA-CRAFT for use with CSOs of serving and ex-service personnel experiencing PTSD and Common Mental Disorders in the UK (UKV-CRAFT). Method: Acceptability of UKV-CRAFT was assessed with interviews with experts, namely key stakeholders (n = 15) working in support provision for serving and ex-service personnel. In addition, individuals who took part in a small-scale demonstrative trial of UKV-CRAFT (three CSOs and three facilitators who delivered UKV-CRAFT) provided feedback. Results: UKV-CRAFT was viewed positively, with interviewees highlighting that programmes like UKV-CRAFT filled a gap in provision for UK Armed Forces families as most services were only available to the serving or ex-service personnel. Interviewees praised how UKV-CRAFT enhanced CSO well-being and communication with their loved one. Concerns over the confidentiality of taking part in UKV-CRAFT were raised due to the perceived negative effects of highlighting a loved one’s mental ill health, especially for CSOs of serving personnel. Ideas for improvement included broadening access to all CSOs regardless of whether their loved one was seeking treatment. Conclusion: Interviewees regarded UKV-CRAFT as a potentially useful intervention suggesting it could be proactively offered universally to support timely help-seeking if required. We recommend further evaluation of UKV-CRAFT on a wider scale, incorporating our recommendations, to assess its effectiveness accurately.

Indigenously Adapted Community Reinforcement Approach (IA-CRA) for Cannabis Users: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Indigenously Adapted Community Reinforcement Approach (IA-CRA) for Cannabis Users: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Comparing organization-focused and state-focused financing strategies on provider-level reach of a youth substance use treatment model: a mixed-method study

BackgroundFinancial barriers in substance use disorder service systems have limited the widespread adoption—i.e., provider-level reach—of evidence-based practices (EBPs) for youth substance use disorders. Reach is essential to maximizing the population-level impact of EBPs. One promising, but rarely studied, type of implementation strategy for overcoming barriers to EBP reach is financing strategies, which direct financial resources in various ways to support implementation. We evaluated financing strategies for the Adolescent Community Reinforcement Approach (A-CRA) EBP by comparing two US federal grant mechanisms, organization-focused and state-focused grants, on organization-level A-CRA reach outcomes.MethodA-CRA implementation took place through organization-focused and state-focused grantee cohorts from 2006 to 2021. We used a quasi-experimental, mixed-method design to compare reach between treatment organizations funded by organization-focused versus state-focused grants (164 organizations, 35 states). Using administrative training records, we calculated reach as the per-organization proportion of trained individuals who received certification in A-CRA clinical delivery and/or supervision by the end of grant funding. We tested differences in certification rate by grant type using multivariable linear regression models that controlled for key covariates (e.g., time), and tested threats to internal validity from our quasi-experimental design through a series of sensitivity analyses. We also drew on interviews and surveys collected from the treatment organizations and (when relevant) interviews with state administrators to identify factors that influenced reach.ResultsThe overall certification rates were 27 percentage points lower in state-focused versus organization-focused grants (p = .01). Sensitivity analyses suggested these findings were not explained by confounding temporal trends nor by organizational or state characteristics. We did not identify significant quantitative moderators of reach outcomes, but qualitative findings suggested certain facilitating factors were more influential for organization-focused grants (e.g., strategic planning) and certain barrier factors were more impactful for state-focused grants (e.g., states finding it difficult to execute grant activities).DiscussionAs the first published comparison of EBP reach outcomes between financing strategies, our findings can help guide state and federal policy related to financing strategies for implementing EBPs that reduce youth substance use. Future work should explore contextual conditions under which different financing strategies can support the widespread implementation of EBPs for substance use disorder treatment.

Culturally tailored digital therapeutic for substance use disorders with urban Indigenous people in the United States: A randomized controlled study

IntroductionIndigenous people experience health disparities, including higher rates of substance use disorders (SUDs). Digital therapeutics are a growing platform for treatment services and have the potential to expand access to culturally responsive interventions for Indigenous people. As one of the first randomized controlled trials for SUDs for American Indian and Alaska Native (AI/AN) adults, the aim of this study was to pilot test the efficacy of a culturally tailored intervention among urban Indigenous adults. MethodsThe study used a randomized controlled parallel design of 12 weeks of treatment-as-usual (TAU) (n = 26) versus TAU + Therapeutic Education System-Native Version (TES-NAV) (n = 27) with follow-up assessments at end of treatment and week 24 in an urban outpatient addiction treatment program for Native American adults. TAU consisted of individual/group counseling and cultural activities. The TES-NAV arm comprised TAU + 26 self-directed culturally tailored digital skills-based modules grounded in the community reinforcement approach with contingency management for abstinence and module completion. Primary outcome was longest consecutive weeks of abstinence from drugs and heavy drinking measured using self-report (Timeline Followback) and urine alcohol and drug toxicology screen during 12 weeks of treatment. Secondary outcomes were percent days abstinence during and posttreatment, coping strategies, social connectedness, and substance use and sexual risk behaviors. ResultsThe study enrolled fifty-three (52.8 % male) AI/AN adults seeking treatment for a SUD. Although the study did not detect a benefit of TAU+TES-NAV over TAU on the primary outcome (Median = 2 consecutive weeks of abstinence for both arms) at end of treatment (treatment effect: Z = −0.78, p = 0.437), TAU+TES-NAV participants did demonstrate significantly greater percent days of abstinence at the week 24 follow-up (69.3 % versus 49.0 % for TAU; t = 2.08, p = 0.045) and significantly greater change in social connectedness mean score, baseline to week 12 (Z = −2.66, p = 0.011), compared to TAU. The study detected no differences between treatment arms for coping strategies or risk behaviors. ConclusionThe addition of TES-NAV to TAU did not significantly improve consecutive weeks of abstinence from drugs or heavy drinking; however, several secondary findings suggest promise for a culturally tailored digital therapeutic SUD intervention among urban Indigenous people. Clinical Trials.Gov registration#NCT03363256.

Blended smartphone intervention for patients in opioid maintenance treatment in Iran: protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BackgroundThe pattern of substance use in Iran is characterized by a high prevalence of opioid use and opioid use disorder (OUD). Although opioid maintenance therapy (OMT) has been introduced in Iran, approximately 50% of people with opioid use disorder remain unreached. Moreover, psychosocial treatment of OUD and common mental health symptoms during OMT is limited. Digital interventions have been shown to improve psychological distress, depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms. In addition, providing psychoeducation and risk reduction counseling to prevent communicable diseases like HIV and infectious hepatitis is common via the Internet. However, despite these promising advances, no smartphone intervention in OMT has been investigated for the treatment of OUD and common comorbid mental health symptoms.ObjectiveWe examine the effectiveness of adding a blended smartphone intervention based on community reinforcement approach, motivational interviewing- and cognitive behavioral therapy compared to OMT as usual that aims to improve OMT outcomes and addresses common mental health symptoms in OMT patients in Iran.MethodAdults with opioid dependence entering 8 treatment centers in Tehran, Iran will be randomly assigned to receive either OMT plus a smartphone intervention or OMT as usual. The primary outcomes will be the percentage of negative urine tests for illicit, non-prescribed use of opioids (opium, heroin, tramadol) and treatment retention. Secondary outcomes will include the longest period of abstinence from the illicit, non-prescribed use of opioids (opium, heroin, and tramadol) confirmed by urine samples, changes in communicable disease risk-taking behaviors, changes in stress and common mental health symptoms, and client satisfaction. Data analysis will follow the intention-to-treat principle and employ (generalized) linear mixed models.DiscussionThis study will provide substantial knowledge for designing effective blended interventions for OUD. Moreover, it will investigate if treatment retention and OMT-related outcomes and common mental health symptoms can be improved by adding a smartphone intervention to OMT.Trial Registrationhttps://en.irct.ir/trial/53578.

‘Please Don’t Do This to Us’: TV Show Illustrates Importance of Families in SUD Care of Youth

‘Please Don’t Do This to Us’: TV Show Illustrates Importance of Families in SUD Care of Youth

Experiences of conducting a substance use disorder treatment, A-CRA, in compulsory institutional care for youth – The challenge of promoting openness in a closed, temporary setting

Effective help for youths in compulsory institutional care in Sweden is of utter importance, but available substance use disorder treatments have been designed for outpatient care and are not readily implemented in the specific lockable setting. The main objective of this study was to explore the experiences of seven therapists who were trained and supervised in conducting the evidence-based method Adolescent Community Reinforcement Approach (A-CRA), with youth 16–21 years old. The youths suffered from substance use disorder and socially disruptive or criminal behaviour and were placed in compulsory institutional care run by the Swedish National Board of Institutional Care. Using content analysis with an inductive approach, results show that therapists perceive A-CRA as a helpful treatment but also describe challenges with the flexible and goal-oriented approach and the temporary context. For future studies, it would be valuable to further explore the youths’ experiences of psychological treatment in institutional care and how therapists can help youth identify and work towards desired change.

Community reinforcement approach (CRA) supported with structured recreation therapy: Experiences of people living with HIV in a pilot substance use treatment program at a specialty hospital

IntroductionCommunity reinforcement approach (CRA) is a behavioral intervention that has demonstrated favorable treatment outcomes for individuals with substance use disorders across studies. CRA focuses on abstinence; however, abstinence is not a desired goal among all people who use substances. Previous research has called for harm reduction–oriented treatment programs, especially within hospital settings. We examined the feasibility of a pilot CRA program, “Exploring My Substance Use” (EMSU), that integrates a harm-reduction perspective with structured recreation therapy at a specialty HIV hospital in Toronto, Canada. MethodsThe 12-week EMSU program was delivered alongside a feasibility study that ran for 24 weeks (including an additional 12 weeks after program completion). We recruited hospital in/outpatients with moderate to severe substance use disorder to participate in the program and study. The EMSU program combined weekly substance use groups with weekly recreation therapy sessions. We collected data at five timepoints throughout the study; this article focuses on qualitative data from the final (24-week) interviews, which examine participants' experiences of the program—an under-researched element in CRA literature. We conducted thematic analysis in NVivo12 and descriptive statistics in SPSSv28. ResultsOf the n = 12 participants enrolled in the EMSU program, six completed the 12-week intervention. All participants completed the 24-week study interview. The average age of participants was 41.5 years; eight identified as cis-male; most identified as white, experienced food insecurity, and were unstably housed. All participants valued the program, including opportunities to learn new skills and examine function(s) of their substance use, and would enroll if it were offered again. Participants discussed the benefits of leisure activities introduced through recreation therapy, which fostered social connections and provided inspiration/confidence to try new activities. Participants cited a lack of support for those experiencing health/personal challenges and overly strict program attendance rules. To improve the program, participants suggested more tactile activities and incorporating incentives. ConclusionsOur findings support the feasibility of a CRA-based program with an integrated harm reduction and a recreation therapy component within an outpatient setting. Future programs should consider building in more flexibility and increased supports for clients dealing with complexities as well as consider COVID-19 related contingencies.

Study protocol for a factorial-randomized controlled trial evaluating the implementation, costs, effectiveness, and sustainment of digital therapeutics for substance use disorder in primary care (DIGITS Trial)

BackgroundExperts recommend that treatment for substance use disorder (SUD) be integrated into primary care. The Digital Therapeutics for Opioids and Other SUD (DIGITS) Trial tests strategies for implementing reSET® and reSET-O®, which are prescription digital therapeutics for SUD and opioid use disorder, respectively, that include the community reinforcement approach, contingency management, and fluency training to reinforce concept mastery. This purpose of this trial is to test whether two implementation strategies improve implementation success (Aim 1) and achieve better population-level cost effectiveness (Aim 2) over a standard implementation approach.Methods/DesignThe DIGITS Trial is a hybrid type III cluster-randomized trial. It examines outcomes of implementation strategies, rather than studying clinical outcomes of a digital therapeutic. It includes 22 primary care clinics from a healthcare system in Washington State and patients with unhealthy substance use who visit clinics during an active implementation period (up to one year). Primary care clinics implemented reSET and reSET-O using a multifaceted implementation strategy previously used by clinical leaders to roll-out smartphone apps (“standard implementation” including discrete strategies such as clinician training, electronic health record tools). Clinics were randomized as 21 sites in a 2x2 factorial design to receive up to two added implementation strategies: (1) practice facilitation, and/or (2) health coaching. Outcome data are derived from electronic health records and logs of digital therapeutic usage. Aim 1’s primary outcomes include reach of the digital therapeutics to patients and fidelity of patients’ use of the digital therapeutics to clinical recommendations. Substance use and engagement in SUD care are additional outcomes. In Aim 2, population-level cost effectiveness analysis will inform the economic benefit of the implementation strategies compared to standard implementation. Implementation is monitored using formative evaluation, and sustainment will be studied for up to one year using qualitative and quantitative research methods.DiscussionThe DIGITS Trial uses an experimental design to test whether implementation strategies increase and improve the delivery of digital therapeutics for SUDs when embedded in a large healthcare system. It will provide data on the potential benefits and cost-effectiveness of alternative implementation strategies. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05160233 (Submitted 12/3/2021). https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05160233

3-day intervention program for family members of hikikomori sufferers: A pilot randomized controlled trial.

Hikikomori, pathological social withdrawal, is becoming a crucial mental health issue in Japan and worldwide. We have developed a 3-day family intervention program for hikikomori sufferers based on Mental Health First Aid (MHFA) and Community Reinforcement and Family Training (CRAFT). This study aims to confirm the effectiveness of the 3-day program by a randomized controlled trial. This study was registered on the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN000037289). Fifteen parents were assigned to the treat as usual (TAU) group (TAU only; Age Mean, 65.6; SD, 7.8), and 14 to the Program group (program + TAU; Age Mean, 67.9; SD, 8.6). This study was discontinued due to the COVID-19 pandemic; the recruitment rate was 36.3% of our target sample size of 80. Perceived skills improved temporally and stigma temporally worsened in the TAU group. Confidence decreased and attitude showed no change in both groups. Aggressive behaviors of hikikomori sufferers were significantly worsened in the Program group; however, no serious domestic violence was reported. In the TAU group, Avoidance and irregular life patterns were improved. Activity levels were worsened in both groups. Two participants (16.7%) in the Program group and one participant (7.7%) in the TAU group reported actual behavioral changes (e.g., utilizing support). We could not draw general conclusions on the effectiveness of the program due to the study discontinuation. Nevertheless, this study indicates the necessity for revision of the program to improve family members' confidence in engaging with hikikomori sufferers, with safer approaching by families.

Predicting therapist adherence to the CRA manual in addiction care

Abstract Although manual-based treatments are widely available in mental health care, they are often not delivered according to protocol. Treatment-, therapist- and organizational-related determinants are known to affect therapist adherence to treatment protocols, and subsequently treatment success. This study examined which determinants are associated with therapist adherence to the Community Reinforcement Approach (CRA) manual, an evidence-based behavioural treatment programme commonly used in addiction care. Using a cross-sectional design, adherence to the CRA manual and potential contributing determinants were assessed through a self-report survey among therapists (N = 69) working in out-patient addiction care. Correlation analysis and backward stepwise regression analysis were used to examine which treatment-, therapist- and organizational-related determinants were associated with CRA adherence. Significant associations with self-reported CRA adherence were found for nine out of 16 determinants examined. Three independent determinants explained 43% of the variance in CRA manual adherence, namely compatibility with the working method therapists were used to, perceived outcome expectations, and perceived adoption of CRA procedures by colleagues. These determinants should be considered when implementing CRA in addiction care, for example by investing in training and taking into account therapists’ previous treatment experience. This also accounts for creating positive outcome expectations and the use of descriptive norms by making experiences explicit of therapists and teams that excel. Future research should investigate which other determinants contribute to therapists’ adherence and focus on clarifying causality between determinants and adherence. Key learning aims (1) To understand the importance of treatment, therapist and organizational determinants influencing therapist adherence to the CRA manual. (2) To explain the three determinants that make the largest contribution to self-reported therapists’ adherence to the CRA manual, namely: compatibility with the working method, perceived outcome expectations, and perceived adoption of CRA procedures by colleagues. (3) To reflect on the clinical implications regarding therapist training, implementation of manual-based treatments and future research.

Telemedicine as bridge to the offline world for person affected with problematic internet use or internet use disorder and concerned significant others.

Internet use disorder is a disorder of the digital age and presents a growing problem worldwide. It appears that due to structural and personal barriers, many persons affected (PA) and Concerned Significant Others (CSO) do not reach the health care system so far and thus a chronification of the pathology can proceed. A telemedicine counseling service for PA and CSO of PA unwilling to enter treatment with two webcam-based sessions of 60 minutes for each group was created with the aim of reaching out to PA and CSO to provide a low-threshold support and refer the participants to the local health care system. Motivational interviewing for PA and CRAFT (Community Reinforcement and Family Training) for CSO were used as methods. Participants answered questions about their Internet use and sociodemographic data and six months after participation, participants were asked via email if they entered the local health care system. CSO answered the questions for themselves and in a third-party rating for PA unwilling to enter treatment. 107 PA (34 years (SD = 13.64), 86% male) and 38 CSO (53 years (SD = 6.11), 28.9% male) participated in the two telemedicine sessions. After participation, 43.9% of the PA and 42.1% of the CSO reached the health care system. When there was consistency between the location of telemedicine consultation and treatment locally, over 90% of participants arrived (PA: 92.3%, CSO: 100%). The results from this study reveal that telemedicine services could be a promising approach to address PA and CSO and build a bridge to the local health care system. Future studies should verify if these results can be replicated in randomized controlled trials.

Psychotherapies Used in the Treatment of Substance Use Disorder: A Narrative Review

Drug addiction is a serious social, economic, and health issue that persists worldwide. However, the efforts and certain measures taken to curb this problem seem to be counterproductive. The high addiction relapse rates and rising number of addiction cases show the requirement for proper treatment. In general, a variety of evidencebased treatment interventions for drug addiction are available. However, the gap between the availability of evidence-based therapies and their limited implementation in practice has yet to be bridged. As recommended by previous studies, psychotherapy (‘Talk therapy’), pharmacotherapy (medication-assisted treatment), alone or in combination, can be used to treat drug addiction, with the capability of resolving the high relapse rate. This article provides an overview of the evidence for, and clinical application of, psychotherapeutic approaches used in the treatment of Substance Use Disorders (SUD). Given the scope of the literature, this review will focus on the psychotherapeutic approaches used in the treatment of illicit drug use disorders, including addictive pharmaceutics, while excluding legal drugs like alcohol and nicotine. Cognitive-Behavioural Therapy (CBT), Contingency Management interventions (CM), Community reinforcement approach, Motivational enhancement therapy, 12-step facilitation therapy, family therapy, and Multisystem Therapy (MST) are some of the most prevalent evidence-based psychotherapeutic approaches currently in practice. Evidence suggests that the combination of different psychotherapies with other treatment interventions is expected to improve treatment outcomes.

Digital interventions for opioid use disorder treatment: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials

IntroductionOpioid use disorders are associated with a high burden of disease and treatment gap. Digital interventions can be used to provide psycho-social treatment for opioid use disorders, as an alternative to or together with face-to-face interventions. This review aimed to assess the application and effectiveness of digital interventions to treat opioid use disorder globally. MethodsThe study team searched four electronic databases (PubMed, Psych INFO, Web of Science and Cochrane Central register of controlled trials). The inclusion criteria were: randomized controlled trials, assessment for opioid use before and at least once following intervention, and use of digital interventions. The primary outcomes were opioid use and/or retention in treatment, with data being summarized in tables and a narrative review presented. ResultsThe initial database search yielded 3542 articles, of which this review includes 20. Nineteen were conducted among adults in the United States. The digital interventions used included web-based, computer-based, telephone calls, video conferencing, automated self-management system, mobile applications and text messaging. They were based on therapeutic education systems, community reinforcement approaches, cognitive behavior therapy, relapse prevention, brief interventions, supportive counselling and motivational interviewing. The studies had mixed findings; of the 20 studies, 10 had statistically significant differences between the treatment groups for opioid abstinence, and four had significant differences for treatment retention. Comparisons were difficult due to varying methodologies. Participants rated the interventions as acceptable and reported high rates of satisfaction. ConclusionThe use of digital interventions for opioid use disorder treatment was acceptable, with varying levels of effectiveness for improving outcomes, which is influenced by participant and intervention delivery factors. Further studies in different parts of the world should compare these findings, specifically in low- and middle-income countries.

Common strategies in empirically supported psychological interventions for alcohol use disorders: A meta-review.

Despite the large number of effective psychological interventions for alcohol use disorders (AUD), there is still a lack of clarity concerning the strategies that make these interventions effective. The overall goal of this review was to identify, examine and synthesise the information about common strategies from evidence-based psychological interventions for AUDs by conducting a review of systematic reviews, that is, a meta-review. We isolated the relevant primary studies from eligible systematic reviews and extracted information about the interventions from these studies to understand the strategies used. Analysis was restricted to narrative summaries. Thirteen reviews were eligible for inclusion in our meta-review. Of these, eight demonstrated the effectiveness of a range of psychological interventions-behavioural couples therapy, cognitive behaviour therapy combined with motivational interviewing, brief interventions, contingency management, psychotherapy plus brief interventions, Alcoholics Anonymous and 12-step treatment programs, family-therapy or family-involved treatment, and community reinforcement approach. The most commonly used component strategies in effective interventions for AUDs included assessment, personalised feedback, motivational interviewing, goal setting, setting and review of homework, problem solving skills and relapse prevention/management. Evidence about commonly used strategies in evidence-based psychological interventions for AUDs offer the possibility of creating menu-driven interventions that can be tailored to respond to individual client needs and preferences in different contexts.

Pilot development and feasibility of telehealth Community Reinforcement and Family Training (CRAFT) for early psychosis and substance use

Substance use is associated with poor outcomes for individuals with early psychosis. Community Reinforcement and Family Training (CRAFT) is an evidence-based approach that helps families to reduce substance use, engage in treatment, and improve family wellbeing, but it has not yet been studied for psychosis and substance use. The present study aimed to develop and evaluate a telehealth intervention utilizing CRAFT for families experiencing early psychosis and substance use. Twenty family members completed six to eight telehealth sessions of CRAFT adapted for early psychosis (CRAFT-EP). Participants completed an assessment battery at baseline, mid- and post-intervention, a three-month follow-up, surveys after each session, and a focus group to measure mean percentage of sessions completed, mean program satisfaction ratings, telehealth preference, and qualitative feedback. Participants had 100% session completion, and program satisfaction was at or near excellent for 99% of sessions. Half of participants preferred a primarily virtual hybrid program, whereas 45% preferred exclusively virtual visits. Communication was the most helpful topic, and participants requested additional written examples and resources. CRAFT-EP is feasible and acceptable to serve as the active intervention in a pilot randomized controlled trial comparing treatment as usual plus CRAFT-EP to treatment as usual.