Rod Janzen and Max Stanton, Hutterites in North America. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2010. 373 pp. We don't need another book about Hutterites, a 30-year-old Hutterite man bluntly told authors when they visited his colony in course of doing research for this book (275). Fortunately, Janzen and Stanton were not persuaded. A great deal has changed in Hutterite life since appearance of what have been standard ethnographic accounts of these distinctive peoples of northern plains: John Bennett's Hutterian Brethren: Agricultural Economy and Social Organization of a Communal People (1967), John A. Hostetler's Hutterite Society (1974), and John A. Hostetler and Gertrude Huntington's Hutterites in North America (1967) (published in George and Louise Spindlers' series, Case Studies in Cultural Anthropology, and unfortunately same title as present volume). Hostetler's book was reissued in 1997 with a new preface, but content changed rather little. Hostetler and Huntington's book was revised in 1980 and again in 1996, but revisions were spotty. In fact, we do need a new book on Hutterites. authors of present study are an historian (Janzen) and an anthropologist (Stanton), both of whom have had extensive personal experience and interactions with Hutterites in US and Canada over last 25 years. book combines historical and ethnographic information. Two of 13 chapters deal entirely with Hutterite history prior to recent past, and other chapters include discussion of events prior to authors' field research. In more ethnographic portions of book, authors say they sought, citing Clifford Geertz, an actor-oriented interpretation of beliefs and conduct, which is to say people's own understanding (xvi). There is a slightly different feel to historical and ethnographic portions of book, but this did not strike me as problematic. authors describe book as a collaborative effort, but indicate that Janzen is the primary writer and researcher (xv). Hutterites date their origins to 1520s in Tirolean region of Austria. Part of Anabaptist movement, which also produced Amish, Mennonites, and Church of Brethren, Hutterites alone embraced community of goods (in 1528) in imitation of apostolic community described in Acts 3:32: The whole group of believers was united, heart and soul; no one claimed private ownership of any possessions, as everything they owned was held in common. Although twice in their history Hutterites faced circumstances which compelled them to abandon common property (once for over a century and once for about 60 years), it always remained their ideal, and they can justifiably claim to have lived communally longer than any other modern European population. A combination of persecution and inducements caused Hutterites to relocate several times during their history-in turn to Moravia, Slovakia, Transylvania, Ukraine, and, finally, to United States. Between 1874 and 1880, over 1,200 Hutterites immigrated to Dakota Territory, where twothirds of them chose to continue living pattern that had predominated in Ukraine and settled on private farms, becoming known as Prairieleut. remainder, about 425, set up three common property colonies, one by each of affiliation groups that had readopted communal living in Ukraine shortly prior to emigrating: Schmiedeleut, Dariusleut, and Lehrerleut. By 1940s, all Prairieleut had given up their Hutterite identity and joined Mennonite churches, but three communal leuts have survived to present. Like their Amish cousins, and in contrast to some 19th century religious communal societies that discouraged or even prohibited procre ation (e.g., Shakers, Rappites, Oneida, and Amana), Hutterites have always been pro-natalist. A widely cited figure from 1950s of an average of 10. …
Read full abstract