Common Treatment-related Adverse Events Research Articles

Sintilimab plus HPV vaccine for recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer

PurposeRecurrent or metastatic cervical cancer (r/m CC) presents limited treatment options for patients failed or progressed quickly following first-line therapy. This study investigated the potential of sintilimab with a prophylactic...

Prospective multicenter study of camrelizumab in real-world settings for asian patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

BackgroundIn this study, we aimed to evaluate the real-world efficacy and safety of camrelizumab and identify clinicolaboratory factors that predict treatment outcomes in patients with unresectable advanced, recurrent, or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) receiving camrelizumab.MethodsHerein, 174 patients with unresectable advanced, recurrent, or metastatic ESCC treated with camrelizumab monotherapy (n = 30), camrelizumab + chemotherapy (CT; n = 91), and camrelizumab + radiotherapy (RT; n = 53) between October 1, 2019 and October 1, 2022 were included.ResultsThe median follow-up time was 20 months (range, 1–34 months). The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of the whole cohort were 8 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 6.5–9.5 months] and 14 months (95% CI, 11.2–16.8 months), respectively. After multivariate analysis, receiving > 4 cycles of camrelizumab was identified as an independent predictor of better PFS [hazard ratio (HR), 0.56; 95% CI, 0.38–0.827; P = 0.004] and OS (HR, 0.532; 95% CI, 0.341–0.83; P = 0.005). An intermediate-to-poor lung immune prognostic index (LIPI) was identified as an independent predictor of worse PFS (HR, 1.505; 95% CI, 1.032–2.196; P = 0.034) and OS (HR, 1.657; 95% CI, 1.094–2.51; P = 0.017). The disease control rate of patients in the camrelizumab monotherapy group, camrelizumab + CT group, and camrelizumab + RT group was 92.3% (95% CI, 74.9–99.1%), 90.6% (95% CI, 82.3–95.9%), and 96.1% (95% CI, 86.8–99.5%), respectively. The treatment-related adverse events (AEs) of grade 3 or higher were reported in 67 patients (38.5%). The most common treatment-related AEs were decreased neutrophil count (23.0%), decreased white blood cell count (19.5%), anemia (7.5%), and pneumonitis (4.6%). One patient (0.6%) died from a treatment-related AE of immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced myocarditis.ConclusionCamrelizumab was safe and effective as both monotherapy and part of a combination therapy. Longer PFS and OS were associated with receiving > 4 cycles of camrelizumab and having a good LIPI. LIPI can be used as a prognostic biomarker for ESCC patients receiving camrelizumab + RT.Trial registrationClinicalTrial.gov Identifier: CHICTR2000039499. Registered: 19th October 2020.

Comparative analysis of efficacy and safety between D-TACE + HAIC + lenvatinib and D-TACE + lenvatinib in the treatment of unresectable massive hepatocellular carcinoma

ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of the combined treatment regimen of D-TACE, HAIC, and Lenvatinib in patients with massive hepatocellular carcinoma, with the goal of providing a safer and more effective therapeutic strategy for individuals suffering from massive hepatocellular carcinoma.Materials and methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted using clinical data from 118 patients with unresectable massive hepatocellular carcinoma who underwent treatment at the Interventional Department of Wuhan Union Hospital between June 2018 and December 2021. Based on the treatment approach, the patients were divided into two groups: the D-TACE + HAIC + Lenvatinib group (N = 54) and the D-TACE + Lenvatinib group (N = 64). The primary study endpoints included the objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) of the two groups. Additionally, the occurrence of treatment-related adverse events in both groups was considered as a secondary study endpoint.ResultsFollowing the treatment, the D-TACE + HAIC + Lenvatinib group exhibited significantly higher ORR and DCR compared to the D-TACE + Lenvatinib group (68.5% vs. 43.8%, 90.7% vs. 73.4%, P < 0.05). Moreover, the D-TACE + HAIC + Lenvatinib group demonstrated longer mPFS and mOS in comparison to the D-TACE + Lenvatinib group (8.6 months vs. 6.6 months, P = 0.005; 19.5 months vs. 14.1 months, P < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in the occurrence rate of common treatment-related adverse events between the TACE + HAIC + Lenvatinib group and the D-TACE + Lenvatinib group (P > 0.05).ConclusionThe combined treatment regimen of D-TACE, HAIC, and Lenvatinib demonstrated superior therapeutic efficacy and safety in managing unresectable massive hepatocellular carcinoma. This combination therapy may serve as a viable option for improving the prognosis of patients with unresectable massive hepatocellular carcinoma.

A Phase 2 study of acimtamig (AFM13) in patients with CD30-positive, relapsed or refractory peripheral T-cell lymphomas.

Patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) generally have poor prognoses and limited treatment options. This study evaluated the efficacy of a novel CD30/CD16A bispecific innate cell engager, acimtamig (AFM13), in patients with R/R PTCL. Patients included those with CD30 expression in ≥1% of tumor cells and who were R/R following ≥1 prior line of systemic therapy. Acimtamig (200 mg) was administered once weekly in 8-week cycles. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) by fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography per independent review committee; secondary and exploratory endpoints included duration of response (DoR), safety, progression-free survival, and overall survival. The ORR in 108 patients was 32.4% (95% CI: 23.7, 42.1) with a complete response rate of 10.2% (95% CI: 5.2, 17.5); median DoR was 2.3 months (95% CI: 1.9, 6.5). Patients with R/R angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma exhibited the greatest number of responses (53.3% [95% CI: 34.3, 71.7]). Responses were independent of CD30 expression level, prior brentuximab vedotin treatment, or steroid premedication. Acimtamig exhibited a tolerable safety profile; the most common treatment-related adverse events were infusion-related reactions in 27 patients (25.0%) and neutropenia in 11 patients (10.2%). No cases of cytokine release syndrome or acimtamig-related deaths were reported. Despite exhibiting promising clinical activity and tolerable safety in a heavily pretreated PTCL population, the study did not meet the criteria for the primary endpoint. The promising clinical efficacy observed warrants further investigation, and development of acimtamig for patients with R/R CD30+ lymphomas continues in combination with allogeneic natural killer cells.

CTNI-61. PRELIMINARY RESULTS OF A PHASE I/II TRIAL OF SELINEXOR AND TEMOZOLOMIDE IN RECURRENT GLIOBLASTOMA

Abstract BACKGROUND Selinexor (SEL) is a first-in-class XPO1 inhibitor with potent antitumor activity through the nuclear retention and reactivation of tumor suppressor proteins, reduced translation of oncogenes, and decreased expression of anti-apoptotic proteins. As a single agent, SEL has demonstrated brain penetration and clinically relevant responses in glioblastoma. We seek to enhance the effect and benefit of SEL by priming with temozolomide (TMZ). METHODS Through an NCI Project Team, we developed a multi-institutional phase I/II clinical trial which opened across the NCI Experimental Therapeutics Clinical Trial Network. Eligibility included histologically confirmed 1st recurrent MGMT promoter methylated glioblastoma. We evaluated safety, tolerability, and dose finding with an IQ 3 + 3 design of TMZ 150mg/m2 on days 1-5 of a 28-day cycle plus SEL on days 8 and 15. RESULTS From October 2022 to March 2024, we enrolled 12 patients (n=11 evaluable) into phase I of the study. Patient characteristics included 82% male, median age 62 (range 50-77), 64% white. The median number of cycles administered was 6 (range 1-12). Two dose levels (SEL 60mg and SEL 80mg) were evaluated. No dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were observed. The most common treatment related adverse events were nausea (58%), decreased platelet count (50%), fatigue (50%), constipation (42%), vomiting (25%), decreased lymphocyte count (25%), and decreased neutrophil count (25%). Grade 3+ treatment related adverse events included nausea, grade 3 (n=1); decreased lymphocyte count, grades 3-4 (n=2); and anorexia, grade 3 (n=1). Phase I has completed enrollment and the recommended phase II dose will be SEL 80mg. Additional results will be presented. CONCLUSION Results suggest that a sequential dosing regimen of SEL+TMZ is feasible, well-tolerated, and may minimize the cumulative toxicity of SEL. The phase II randomized portion of this trial is enrolling nationwide and will investigate efficacy and candidate molecular signatures of vulnerability (NCI #10505, NCT05432804).

CTNI-48. A PHASE 1 STUDY OF ERAS-801, A POTENT, SELECTIVE, AND CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM (CNS)-PENETRANT EPIDERMAL GROWTH FACTOR RECEPTOR (EGFR) INHIBITOR, FOR PATIENTS WITH RECURRENT GLIOBLASTOMA MULTIFORME (GBM)

Abstract EGFR is among the most common targets for genetic alterations in GBM. Changes in EGFR gene amplification and the extracellular domain result in receptor overexpression or constitutive activation, and enhanced oncogenic signaling. ERAS-801 is a potent, selective, and highly CNS-penetrant EGFR inhibitor being developed for the treatment of GBM, with a focus on tumors harboring EGFR genetic alterations. THUNDERBBOLT-1 is the first-in-human phase 1 dose escalation and expansion trial evaluating ERAS-801 monotherapy for patients with recurrent GBM. ERAS-801 is administered orally once daily for continuous 28-day cycles. As of April 10, 2024, a total of 52 patients were treated across 7 dose cohorts: 20 mg (n=3), 40 mg (n=5), 80 mg (n=3), 160 mg (n=6), 240 mg (n=25), 280 mg (n=4), or 320 mg (n=6). Key patient characteristics were median age of 60 years, 67% male, mostly one prior therapy, and 81% tumors with alterations. The MTD was 240 mg. Dose-limiting toxicities were observed at 320 mg (n=2, Grade 2 QT prolongation, Grade 3 rash and Grade 3 dermatitis acneiform), 280 mg (n=3, Grade 3 QT prolongation), and 240 mg (n=1, Grade 3 QT prolongation) doses. The most common treatment related adverse events (TRAEs), in &amp;gt;10% of patients, were dermatitis acneiform, diarrhea, and nausea. Electrocardiogram QT prolongation occurred in 11.5% of patients and was not associated with clinical findings. ERAS-801 showed rapid absorption; peak plasma concentration was generally achieved within 6 hours post dose. PK exposure increased in a dose-dependent manner over the doses evaluated. Across all doses there was a confirmed partial response (using mRANO) in 1 patient and 6 patients achieved a PFS of 6 months. ERAS-801 shows well behaved PK with substantial CNS penetration, preliminary safety, and tolerability in patients with recurrent GBM. The TRAEs were reversible, manageable, and consistent with known toxicities of EGFR inhibitors.

CTIM-26. PHASE II STUDY OF AZELIRAGON IN COMBINATION WITH RADIATION THERAPY IN NEWLY DIAGNOSED PATIENTS WITH MGMT-UNMETHYLATED GLIOBLASTOMA

Abstract BACKGROUND Myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) exacerbate immunosuppression and immune exhaustion in glioblastoma (GBM) and promote resistance to chemoradiotherapy. Preclinical data demonstrate that inhibiting the receptor for advanced glycation end-products (RAGE) pathway using azeliragon, when combined with radiation therapy (RT), can modulate MDSC accumulation in the tumor microenvironment and improve tumor control. CAN-401 is a phase II study evaluating the safety and preliminary clinical efficacy of combining azeliragon with RT for newly diagnosed IDH-wildtype MGMT-unmethylated glioblastoma (GBM). METHODS This multi-institutional, single-arm, open-label phase II study combines azeliragon with RT (60 Gy/30 fractions). Azeliragon is administered orally with a loading dose of 30 mg twice daily for 6 days before RT, followed by 20 mg daily during and after RT. If more than one dose-limiting toxicity occurs during the safety run-in of 6 patients, additional patients will be treated at de-escalated dose levels using the rolling six design. The study hypothesizes that azeliragon and RT will improve median progression-free survival (PFS) to 9.7 months compared to historical control of 5.7 months, corresponding to a hazard ratio of 0.58. The study aims to enroll 30 evaluable patients. RESULTS From December 2023 to May 2024, 10 patients were enrolled and treated with 20 mg of azeliragon daily, including 6 patients in the safety run-in. No dose-limiting toxicity was observed, hence no dose de-escalation was needed. The most common treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were grade 1, including fatigue and lymphopenia. There were no dose modifications or discontinuations due to treatment-related AEs. Enrollment is ongoing, and updated clinical outcomes will be reported. CONCLUSIONS Azeliragon at 20 mg per day with concurrent RT is well tolerated in patients with GBM. The phase II study is currently enrolling across 8 institutions in the United States (NCT05986851).

The long-term clinical efficacy and safety of lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab in endometrial cancer: data from routine clinical practice in Russia

Background. Endometrial cancer (EC) treatment outcomes need to be improved. Immunotargeted therapy lead to long-term and delayed effects compared to chemotherapy. Estimation of long-term efficacy and quality of life are crucial when we are talking about efficacy in whole.Aim. To evaluate the long-term clinical efficacy of lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab therapy in patients with EC.Materials and methods. The study included 43 patients with stages I-IV EC with mismatch repair-proficient tumors and treatment duration of more than 9 months. We evaluated median progression-free survival, objective response, duration of treatment depending on the line of therapy, prevalence and type of adverse events, and correction regimens. Results. Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab treatment was safe and efficacious in recurrent EC. Median of progression-free survival (patients with response or stabilization more than 9 months) is 10.2 months (95 % confidence interval 9.1-13.0), median of follow up is 9.7 (1.4-33.8) months. There were no complete responses, partial response was in 12 (28 %) patients, disease stabilization was in 31 (72 %) patients. Regarding safety, the overall rate of any-grade adverse events was 56.3 %. The most common treatment-related adverse events were fatigue (32.6 %), hypertension (23.3 %), and hypothyroidism (18.6 %). Dose reduction was performed in 22 (51.2 %) patients.Conclusion. The combination of lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab has long-term efficacy and manageable profile of safety. The presence of a significant pool of patients with durable response allows improving the survival rate of such patients in Russia.

Efficacy, safety, and biomarker analysis of TACE combined with lenvatinib plus sintilimab in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a real-world study

BackgroundThe integration of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) with systemic therapy has demonstrated improved survival outcomes in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, there is limited evidence evaluating the combination of TACE with the systemic regimen of anti-PD-1/L1 inhibitor plus lenvatinib. This study aims to assess the efficacy and safety of TACE combined with lenvatinib and sintilimab in unresectable HCC patients.MethodsUnresectable HCC patients who received TACE in combination with sintilimab plus Lenvatinib as first-line treatment from 1 January 2020 to 31 March 2023 were included for the analysis. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were evaluated by modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors criteria. Exploratory biomarker analysis was conducted.ResultsThe study included 70 patients with unresectable HCC, predominantly male and infected with Hepatitis B. The median follow-up duration for the whole cohort was 13.8 months (95% CI 11.08–16.7). The ORR was 61.4% (95% CI, 49.0%–72.8%) and the DCR was 68.6% (95%CI, 56.4%–79.2%). The median PFS was 13.2 months (95% CI 11.0-NA), with a corresponding 1-year PFS rate of 50.3% (95% CI 39.7%-65.5%). The median OS was not reached, and the 1-year OS rate was 89.3% (95% CI 81.4%–97.9%). The most common treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were fatigue 38.6% (27/70), hypertension 32.9% (23/70), and hand-foot syndrome 31.4% (22/70). Most TRAEs were mild-to-moderate and manageable. In addition, significant predictive value was found in alpha-fetoprotein levels (AFP), with patients showing a level of decrease post-treatment having better PFS.ConclusionThe combination regimen demonstrated promising efficacy in treating unresectable HCC, accompanied by manageable safety profiles. Furthermore, the results of this investigation suggest that AFP holds promise as predictive biomarkers for this treatment strategy.

Vebreltinib for Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Harboring c-Met Exon 14 Skipping Mutation: A Multicenter, Single-Arm, Phase II KUNPENG Study.

The KUNPENG study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of vebreltinib (also known as bozitinib, APL-101, PLB-1001, and CBT-101), a potent and highly selective inhibitor of c-mesenchymal-epithelial transition (MET), in patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring c-Met alterations. This multicenter, multicohort, open-label, single-arm, phase II trial enrolled patients with c-Met dysregulated, locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC from January 2020 to August 2022 across 17 centers. Cohort 1 included patients with MET exon 14 skipping (METex14)-mutant NSCLC who had not previously received MET inhibitors. Participants were administered vebreltinib at a dosage of 200 mg twice a day in 28-day cycles. The primary end point was the objective response rate (ORR), and the key secondary end point was the duration of response (DoR), both evaluated by a blinded independent review committee according to the RECIST version 1.1. As of August 9, 2022, 52 patients had been enrolled in cohort 1, of whom 35 (67.3%) were treatment-naïve. The ORR reached 75% (95% CI, 61.1 to 86). Among treatment-naïve patients, the ORR was 77.1% (95% CI, 59.9 to 89.6), and in previously treated patients, it was 70.6% (95% CI, 44.0 to 89.7). The disease control rate was 96.2%, with a median DoR of 15.9 months, a median progression-free survival of 14.1 months, and a median overall survival of 20.7 months. The most common treatment-related adverse events were peripheral edema (82.7%), QT prolongation (30.8%), and elevated serum creatinine (28.8%). Vebreltinib has shown promising efficacy and a favorable safety profile in patients with METex14-mutant NSCLC.

Adavosertib in Combination with Olaparib in Patients with Refractory Solid Tumors: An Open-Label, Dose-Finding, and Dose-Expansion Phase Ib Trial.

Adavosertib is a first-in-class, selective small-molecule inhibitor of Wee1. Olaparib is an inhibitor of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP). Preclinical data suggest that adavosertib enhances the antitumor effect of PARP inhibitors. The safety, tolerability, and efficacy of adavosertib plus olaparib were evaluated in patients with refractory solid tumors to define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase II dose (RP2D). Eligible patients in part A (dose finding) had a refractory solid tumor for which there is no established treatment and had received ≥ 1 prior course of systemic therapy; in part B (dose expansion), patients had platinum-sensitive extensive-stage or relapsed small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). Patients received adavosertib [once (qd) or twice daily (bid)] for 3 consecutive days with 4 days off treatment (3/4), or 5 consecutive days with 2 days off (5/2), plus olaparib (bid) for 14 or 21 days of a 21-day cycle. A total of 130 patients were enrolled in the study, 120 in part A and 10 in part B. The MTD for adavosertib bid was 175 mg (days 1-3, 8-10/21-day cycle) plus continuous olaparib 200 mg bid; the once-daily MTD (and RP2D) was adavosertib 200 mg (days 1-3, 8-10/21-day cycle) plus continuous olaparib 200 mg bid. In the MTD/RP2D cohort, one patient (7%) experienced a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of thrombocytopenia. The most common treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) in the cohorts in which MTD/RP2D for bid dosing and RP2D for qd dosing were determined were fatigue (64.3% and 15.4%, respectively), diarrhea (42.9% and 30.8%), decreased appetite (35.7% and 23.1%), nausea (35.7% and 15.4%), and anemia (35.7% and 38.5%). In the SCLC dose-expansion cohort, TRAEs occurred in eight patients (88.9%), including thrombocytopenia (66.7%) and anemia (55.6%). In part A, objective response rate (ORR) was 14.8% [95% confidence interval (CI) 8.7-22.9] overall; for the cohorts in which MTD/RP2D for bid dosing and RP2D for qd dosing were determined, ORR was 30.8% (9.1-61.4) and 9.1% (0.2-41.3), respectively. ORR was 11.1% [95% CI 0.3-48.2; one partial response (PR)], disease control rate was 22.2% (2.8-60.0; one PR, one stable disease), and median progression-free survival was 1.5 months (1.3-4.2) in the SCLC dose-expansion cohort. Adverse events and DLTs observed in the bid MTD and once-daily MTD/RP2D dosing schedules were manageable and consistent with known adavosertib and olaparib safety profiles. Limited antitumor activity was observed with adavosertib plus olaparib combination therapy. ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02511795 (registration: 28 July 2015).

A phase 1 study of the amino acid modulator pegcrisantaspase and venetoclax for relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia

AbstractGlutamine dependency has been shown to be a metabolic vulnerability in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Prior studies using several in vivo AML models showed that depletion of plasma glutamine, induced by long-acting crisantaspase (pegcrisantaspase [PegC]) was synergistic with the BCL-2 inhibitor venetoclax (Ven), resulting in significantly reduced leukemia burden and enhanced survival. Here, we report a phase 1 study of the combination of Ven and PegC (VenPegC) for treating adult patients with relapsed or refractory AML, including patients who had previously received Ven. The primary end points were the incidence of regimen-limiting toxicities (RLTs) and the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Twenty-five patients received at least 1 PegC dose with Ven, and 18 efficacy-evaluable patients completed at least 1 VenPegC cycle; 12 (67%) had previously received Ven. Hyperbilirubinemia was the RLT and occurred in 60% of patients treated with VenPegC; 20% had grade ≥3 bilirubin elevations. MTD was determined to be Ven 400 mg daily with biweekly PegC 750 IU/m2. The most common treatment-related adverse events of any grade in 25 patients who received VenPegC included antithrombin III decrease (52%), elevated transaminases (36%-48%), fatigue (28%), and hypofibrinogenemia (24%). No thromboembolic or hemorrhagic adverse events or clinical pancreatitis were observed. The overall complete remission rate in efficacy-evaluable patients was 33%. Response correlated with alterations in proteins involved in messenger RNA translation. In patients with RUNX1 mutations, the composite complete rate was 100%. This study was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT04666649.

Long-Term Efficacy and Tolerability of an Emollient Containing Glycerol and Paraffin for Moderate-to-Severe Uremic Xerosis: A Randomized Phase3 Study.

There is an unmet need for effective topical therapies for patients with uremic xerosis and chronic kidney disease-associated pruritus (CKD-aP). The long-term efficacy and tolerability of an emollient containing glycerol 15% and paraffin 10% (V0034CR) was evaluated in a phase3 study. In this randomized, double-blind, two-parallel group, vehicle-controlled study, patients with moderate-to-severe uremic xerosis were randomized to once-daily application of V0034CR or vehicle control for 28days (periodI). This was followed by a treatment-free period of ≤ 21days (periodII), then all patients received open-label treatment with V0034CR for ≥ 84days (periodIII). Outcomes included treatment response at the end of periodI (El Gammal's xerosis severity score), instrumental measures of scaling (D-Squame technique), time to relapse during periodII, rate of recurrence during periodIII, pruritus severity over time, patient acceptability, and adverse events (AEs). The intent-to-treat population comprised 235 patients randomized to V0034CR (n = 118) or vehicle control (n = 117) during periodI. Treatment response at the end of periodI was achieved by 71 patients (60.2%) in the V0034CR group versus 48 (41.0%) with vehicle control (p = 0.0041). This coincided with greater reductions in the total surface area of squames (p = 0.001 vs vehicle control). Xerosis relapsed progressively without treatment in periodII; however, remission was durable under maintenance therapy in periodIII. Improvements in pruritus severity were comparable between V0034CR and vehicle control, suggesting that the antipruritic effect of V0034CR was mainly exerted by its oil-in-water emulsion base. V0034CR had high patient acceptability and was well tolerated; the most common treatment-related AEs were irritation or erythema (2.1%), exacerbated pruritus (1.3%), and vesicles at the application site (0.9%). These data support the use of V0034CR, with its hydrating and occlusive properties, for the long-term management of patients with moderate-to-severe uremic xerosis and CKD-aP. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01084148; EudraCT number 2006-002201-31.

Phase Ib study of anti-PD-L1 monoclonal antibody socazolimab in combination with nab-paclitaxel as first-line therapy for advanced urothelial carcinoma.

PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have demonstrated activity in the post-platinum and platinum-ineligible settings for advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC). As only around 50% of patients with aUC can tolerate platinum-containing treatment, treatments combining first-line ICIs with non-platinum drugs are urgently needed. Therefore, we assessed the safety and efficacy of the anti-PD-L1 monoclonal antibody Socazolimab in combination with nab-paclitaxel as first-line therapy in aUC (NCT04603846). This was a multi-center, single-arm, phase Ib study that enrolled patients with treatment-naive aUC. Patients received Socazolimab (5mg/kg) and nab-paclitaxel (260mg/m2) Q3w. The primary endpoint was safety and tolerability of the combination regimen. Second endpoints were the objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival. Between September, 2020 and September, 2021, 20 patients with urothelial carcinoma were enrolled, arising from renal pelvis (5), bladder (8), and ureter (7). After a median follow-up of 17 months, the median number of treatment cycles was 12. No patients had dose limiting toxicity. All patients had treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), most of which were grade 1 or 2. The common TRAEs (≥20%) were peripheral neurotoxicity, alopecia, rash, increased ALT, weight loss, weakness, pruritus, increased AST, increased γGT, increased ALP, neutropenia, emesis, and anorexia. Nine patients (45%) developed grade 3 TRAEs including peripheral neurotoxicity (30.0%), increased ALT (10.0%), and increased γGT (5.0%). Two patients (10%) discontinued treatment because of grade 3 mouth ulcer (n = 1) and grade 2 lung fibrosis (n = 1). No grade 4-5 TRAEs were observed. Among the 17 patients who had received at least one tumor assessment, ORR was 58.8% (95% CI, 32.9%-81.6%) and the median progression-free survival was 8.3 months (95% CI, 5.2-19.5). The median duration of response was 13.3 months (95% CI, 2.0-20.1), and the overall survival was 19.5 months (95% CI, 11.2-not reached). Socazolimab combined with nab-paclitaxel has shown good safety and promising antitumor activity as first-line therapy in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma.

The efficacy and safety of a novel PD-1/CTLA-4 bispecific antibody cadonilimab (AK104) in advanced non-smallcell lung cancer: A multicenter retrospective observational study.

For patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who have received frontline immunochemotherapy, subsequent treatment options are limited. As the first dual programmed cell death-1 (PD-1)/cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 bispecific antibody approved globally, cadonilimab demonstrated potential antitumor activity in advanced NSCLC patients resistant to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies. We retrospectively collected efficacy and safety data from advanced NSCLC patients treated with cadonilimab-based regimens in later therapy lines. A total of 41 advanced NSCLC patients refractory to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy were enrolled. More than half of the patients received cadonilimab-based regimen as a fourth or later line of treatment. At the data cutoff date, treatment efficacy could be evaluated in 23 patients. One patient (4.3%) achieved partial response, eight patients (34.8%) experienced stable disease, and 14 patients (60.9%) progressed. The objective response rate and disease control rate were 4.3% and 39.1%, respectively. The median progression-free survival for all evaluated patients was 108.0 days. Due to the short follow-up period, the median overall survival has not yet been reached. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) and immune-related AEs occurred in 63.4% and 22% patients, respectively. The most common TRAEs included gamma-glutamyl transferase elevation (17.1%), coughing (14.6%), and fatigue (12.2%). Five patients (12.2%) experienced grade ≥3 TRAEs. In this heavily pretreated cohort of advanced NSCLC patients, cadonilimab-based regimens showed moderate antitumor efficacy with a generally tolerable and manageable safety profile. However, more evidence is needed to support the administration of cadonilimab in NSCLC patients refractory to previous anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy.

Safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a single intravenous dose of SHR-1707 in healthy adult subjects: two randomized, double-blind, single-ascending-dose, phase 1 studies

BackgroundSHR-1707 is a novel humanized anti-Aβ IgG1 monoclonal antibody that binds to Aβ fibrils and monomers to block the formation of Aβ plaques or to promote the microglial phagocytosis of Aβ. Preclinical studies showed that SHR-1707 reduced brain Aβ deposition in 5xFAD transgenic mice. Herein, we conducted two phase 1 studies to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of a single intravenous dose of SHR-1707 in healthy adult subjects.MethodsTwo randomized, double-blind, single-ascending-dose, phase 1 studies were conducted in China (Study CHN) and Australia (Study AUS). Study CHN consisted of 2 parts. In Part 1, eligible healthy young adults (18–45 years) were sequentially randomized 8:2 to receive SHR-1707 (five cohorts: 2, 6, 20, 40, and 60 mg/kg) or placebo in each cohort; in Part 2, elderly subjects (55–80 years) were randomized 8:4 to receive SHR-1707 (20 mg/kg) or placebo. A similar design was used in Study AUS, but with only healthy young adults enrolled across three dosing cohorts (2, 20, and 60 mg/kg).ResultsSixty-two (part 1/2, n = 50/12; age range, 18–42/55–63 years) and 30 subjects (age range, 18–42 years) received SHR-1707 or placebo in Study CHN and Study AUS, respectively. In Study CHN, all treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were mild, with the most common being transient laboratory abnormalities. In Study AUS, TRAEs were mostly mild (1 moderate event each with SHR-1707/placebo); the most common TRAEs with SHR-1707 were dysgeusia and fatigue (8.3% each). In both studies, the exposure of SHR-1707 increased in a slightly greater than dose-proportional manner over the dose range of 2–60 mg/kg in young adults; there was a dose-dependent increase in plasma Aβ42 concentration following SHR-1707 administration compared with the placebo group. The safety and PK and PD profiles of SHR-1707 in the elderly subjects were consistent with the younger counterpart at the same dose level. No ethnic difference in safety, PK and PD of SHR-1707 was observed.ConclusionsA single intravenous dose of SHR-1707 at 2–60 mg/kg was safe and well tolerated in healthy young adult and elderly subjects. The PK and PD profiles are supportive for further clinical development.Trial registrationNCT04973189 (retrospectively registered on Jul.21, 2021) and NCT04745104 (registered on Feb.6, 2021) on clinicaltrials.gov.

Recaticimab Monotherapy for Nonfamilial Hypercholesterolemia and Mixed Hyperlipemia: The Phase 3 REMAIN-1 Randomized Trial

BackgroundMonoclonal antibodies against proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) have been used to reduce the level of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), but require either biweekly or monthly dosing frequency. Recaticimab is a new humanized monoclonal antibody selectively targeting PCSK9, with long-acting characteristic. ObjectivesThe purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of recaticimab monotherapy in patients with nonfamilial hypercholesterolemia and mixed hyperlipemia at low-to-moderate atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk, and to explore different dosing strategies to provide patients with flexible administration options. MethodsThis was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study conducted at 59 sites in China. Patients with fasting LDL-C ≥2.6 to <4.9 mmol/L, fasting triglyceride ≤5.6 mmol/L, and 10-year ASCVD risk score <10% were randomly assigned (2:2:2:1:1:1) to receive subcutaneous injections of recaticimab at 150 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W), 300 mg every 8 weeks (Q8W), or 450 mg every 12 weeks (Q12W), or matching placebo, on background lipid-lowering diet. Primary endpoint was percentage change in LDL-C from baseline to week 12 for 150 mg Q4W and 450 mg Q12W and to week 16 for 300 mg Q8W. ResultsA total of 703 patients underwent randomization and received recaticimab (n = 157, 156, and 155 for 150 mg Q4W, 300 mg Q8W, and 450 mg Q12W, respectively) or placebo (n = 78, 79, and 78, respectively). Compared with placebo, recaticimab further reduced LDL-C by 49.6% (95% CI: 44.2%-54.9%) at 150 mg Q4W, 52.8% (95% CI: 48.3%-57.2%) at 300 mg Q8W, and 45.0% (95% CI: 41.0%-49.0%) at 450 mg Q12W (P < 0.0001 for all comparisons). Safety with recaticimab was comparable to placebo. After 12 or 16 weeks of treatment, patients who received recaticimab continued treatment until week 24, whereas those allocated to placebo were switched to recaticimab treatment with the same dosing strategy. Both 24-week recaticimab and 12- or 8-week recaticimab switched from placebo were effective. With 24 weeks of recaticimab treatment, the most common treatment-related adverse event was injection site reaction (n = 23 [4.9%]). ConclusionsRecaticimab monotherapy yielded significant LDL-C reductions and showed comparable safety vs placebo in patients with nonfamilial hypercholesterolemia and mixed hyperlipemia at low-to-moderate ASCVD risk, even with an infrequent dosing interval up to Q12W.

Pembrolizumab for the First-Line Treatment of Recurrent Locally Advanced or Metastatic Merkel Cell Carcinoma: Results from the Single-Arm, Open-Label, Phase III KEYNOTE-913 Study.

The phase III KEYNOTE-913 study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab as first-line therapy in patients with advanced Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC). The aim was to report results from the primary analysis of KEYNOTE-913. Patients with recurrent locally advanced or metastatic MCC received pembrolizumab 200mg intravenously every 3weeks for up to 35 treatments (~2 years). The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1) by blinded independent central review (BICR). Secondary end points were duration of response (DOR) and progression-free survival (PFS) per RECIST v1.1 by BICR, overall survival (OS), and safety and tolerability. Fifty-five patients were treated with pembrolizumab. The median time from first dose to data cutoff (February 15, 2024) was 50.3 months (range 38.7-59.4). The ORR was 49% (95% confidence interval [CI] 35-63), with 12 complete responses and 15 partial responses. The median DOR was 39.8 months (range 4.8-52.5+), and the 24-month DOR rate was 69%. The median PFS was 9.3 months (95% CI 3-26), and the 24-month PFS rate was 39%. The median OS was 24.3 months (95% CI 12.4 to not reached), and the 24-month OS rate was 51%. Any-grade treatment-related adverse events (AEs) occurred in 38 patients (69%); 13 patients (24%) experienced grade 3-5 AEs. The most common treatment-related AEs were fatigue (n = 12 [22%]), pruritus (n = 12 [22%]), and lipase increase (n = 10 [18%]). One patient died of treatment-related Guillain-Barré syndrome. Pembrolizumab provided durable antitumor activity and promising survival and had a manageable safety profile in patients with recurrent locally advanced or metastatic MCC, supporting its use in this population. Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03783078.

The safety and tolerability of berdazimer gel 10.3% in Japanese patients with molluscum contagiosum

Molluscum contagiosum (MC) is a contagious viral skin infection. Berdazimer gel, 10.3% (SB206 12%) is approved in the United States as the first topical, at-home MC prescription medication. To assess safety and tolerability of SB206 12% in Japanese patients with MC. SKN15B01 (JRCT2031230123) was a phase 2, multicenter, single-group, open-label study in Japanese patients ≥2years old with 3-70 baseline MC lesions. Patients with only periocular MC and/or immunosuppression were excluded. SB206 12% was applied once daily to lesions for 12weeks. Safety endpoints included adverse events and local skin reactions. Exploratory efficacy endpoints included percentage of patients with complete lesion clearance and lesion count percent change from baseline. Twenty patients (12 males, 8 females) with mean (range) age of 5.2 (3-13) years and mean (range) baseline lesion counts of 22.5 (8-44). Complete clearance and percent change from baseline at week 12 were 60% and -89.2%, respectively. The most common treatment-related adverse events were application site-erythema (25%, n=5), -pain (25%, n=5), -pruritis (25%, n=5), and -dermatitis (20%, n=4), all mild/moderate in severity. Single-group study; small sample size. Safety and efficacy of berdazimer gel, 10.3% in Japanese patients were favorable and consistent with previous studies.

Targeting the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Pathway in Chemotherapy-Resistant Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Phase II Study.

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) pathway activation causes chemotherapy resistance, and inhibition of the EGFR pathway sensitizes triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) cells to chemotherapy in preclinical models. Given the high prevalence of EGFR overexpression in TNBC, we conducted a single-arm phase II study of panitumumab (anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody), carboplatin, and paclitaxel as the second phase of neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) in patients with doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC)-resistant TNBC (NCT02593175). Patients with early-stage, AC-resistant TNBC, defined as disease progression or ≤80% reduction in tumor volume after four cycles of AC, were eligible for this study and received panitumumab (2.5 mg/kg i.v., every week × 13), paclitaxel (80 mg/m2 i.v. every week × 12), and carboplatin (AUC = 4 i.v., every 3 weeks × 4) as the second phase of NAT. A two-stage Gehan-type design was used to detect an improvement in the pathological complete response (pCR)/residual cancer burden class I (RCB-I) rate from 5% to 20%. Whole-exome sequencing was performed on diagnostic tumor biospecimens, where available. From November 3, 2016, through August 23, 2021, 43 patients with AC-resistant TNBC were enrolled. The combined pCR/RCB-I rate was 30.2%. The most common treatment-related adverse events were neutropenia (72%) and anemia (61%), with 7 (16%), 16 (37%), and 8 (19%) patients experiencing grade 4 neutropenia, grade 3 neutropenia, and grade 3 anemia, respectively. No new safety signals were observed. This study met its primary endpoint (pCR/RCB-I = 30.2% vs. 5% in historical controls), suggesting that panitumumab should be evaluated as a component of NAT in patients with chemotherapy-resistant TNBC in a larger, randomized clinical trial. The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) pathway has been implicated as a driver of chemotherapy resistance in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Here, we evaluate the combination of panitumumab, carboplatin, and paclitaxel as the second phase of neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) in patients with AC-resistant TNBC. This study met its primary efficacy endpoint, and molecular alterations in EGFR pathway genes did not seem to influence response to the study regimen.