Common Reason For Emergency Department Visits Research Articles

A Comprehensive Evaluation of Emergency Department Utilization by Patients With Cirrhosis.

Emergency department (ED)-based care is required for cirrhosis management, yet the burden of cirrhosis-related ED healthcare utilization is understudied. We aimed to describe ED utilization within a statewide health system and compare the outcomes of high ED use (HEDU) vs non-HEDU in individuals with cirrhosis. We retrospectively reviewed charts of adults with cirrhosis who presented to any of 16 EDs within the Indiana University Health system in 2021. Patient characteristics, features of the initial ED visit, subsequent 90-day healthcare use, and 360-day outcomes were collected. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to identify predictors HEDU status which was defined as ≥2 ED visits within 90 days after the index ED visit. There were 2,124 eligible patients (mean age 61.3 years, 53% male, and 91% White). Major etiologies of cirrhosis were alcohol (38%), metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (27%), and viral hepatitis (21%). Cirrhosis was newly diagnosed in the ED visit for 18.4%. Most common reasons for ED visits were abdominal pain (21%), shortness of breath (19%), and ascites/volume overload (16%). Of the initial ED visits, 20% (n = 424) were potentially avoidable. The overall 90-day mortality was 16%. Within 90 days, there were 366 HEDU (20%). Notable variables independently associated with HEDU were model for end-stage liver disease-sodium (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.044, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.005-1.085), prior ED encounter (aOR 1.520, 95% CI 1.136-2.034), and avoidable initial ED visit (aOR 1.938, 95% CI 1.014-3.703). Abdominal pain, shortness of breath, and ascites/fluid overload are the common presenting reasons for ED visits for patients with cirrhosis. Patients with cirrhosis presenting to the ED experience a 90-day mortality rate of 16%, and among those who initially visited the ED, 20% were HEDU. We identified several variables independently associated with HEDU. Our observations pave the way for developing interventions to optimize the care of patients with cirrhosis presenting to the ED and to lower repeated ED visits.

Emergency Department Use Among Combat and Non-Combat Post-9/11 Military Veterans.

Most post-9/11 Veterans have completed at least 1 combat deployment-a known factor associated with adverse health outcomes. Such Veterans are known to have unmet health care needs, and the emergency department (ED) may serve as a safety net, yet little is known about whether combat status is associated with more frequent ED use. We sought to evaluate the relationship between combat status and frequency of ED use among post-9/11 Veterans and assess the most common reasons for ED visits. This retrospective cohort study consisted of post-9/11 Veterans who enrolled in U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) care between fiscal years (FYs) 2005 and 2015. Data were obtained from the VA Corporate Data Warehouse. Incidence rates for ED visits for combat and non-combat Veterans were compared from FY 2010 to 2019 using zero-inflated negative binomial regression. The most frequent reasons for ED visits were determined using International Classification of Diseases codes. This study was approved by the Stanford Institutional Review Board. Among 1.3 million Veterans included in analyses, 70.4% had deployed to a combat zone. The mean (SD) age of our cohort was 32.6 (5.0) years and 83.5% of Veterans were male. After controlling for other factors, combat Veterans had 1.84 times the rate of ED visits compared to non-combat Veterans (95% CI, 1.83-1.85). Only combat Veterans had a mental health-related ED visit (suicidal ideations) among the top 3 reasons for ED presentation. Those who deployed to a combat zone had a significantly higher rate of ED use compared to those who did not. Further, mental health-related ED diagnoses appeared to be more prevalent in combat Veterans. These findings highlight the unique health care needs faced by combat Veterans and emphasize the importance of tailored interventions and support services for this specific population.

A 6-year Retrospective Study on the Clinical Profile and Outcomes of Postrenal Transplant Patients in the Emergency Department

Abstract Background: Kidney transplantation is widely recognized as the primary treatment for those with end-stage renal disease. Our goal was to provide an overview of the clinical characteristics of postrenal transplant patients (commercial vs. noncommercial) seeking care in the emergency department (ED). Methodology: The study was conducted at a leading Omani ED from 2015 to 2021; this study included all postrenal transplant patients. Various variables were categorized, coded, and analyzed. Results: A total of 55 postrenal transplant patients were included in our study. Of these, 60.0% were male (n = 33). Among the participants, 14.5% (n = 8) had undergone noncommercial renal transplants, whereas the remaining 85.5% (n = 47) had undergone commercial renal transplants. Among noncommercial postrenal transplant patients, the most common reasons for ED visits were fever (5), gastrointestinal symptoms (4), and cardiac symptoms (3). They also presented with pain at the surgical site (2) and urological symptoms such as dysuria and hematuria (2). In contrast, the most frequent clinical presentations among commercial postrenal transplant patients were cardiac symptoms (13) and pain at the surgical site (13), followed by fever (12). Noncommercial renal transplant patients had a high discharge rate of 62.5% (5) and a low admission rate of 37.5% (3). On the other hand, commercial renal transplant patients necessitated a high admission rate of 59.6% (28) and a low discharge rate of 40.4% (19). Conclusion: The majority of patients had received commercial kidney transplants, and the most common complaints upon their presentation to the ED were cardiac symptoms and pain at the surgical site. Patients undergoing commercial transplants had higher rates of admission.

Community Emergency Care Use by Veterans in an Era of Expanding Choice

Recently passed legislation aimed at improving access to care has considerably expanded options for veterans to receive emergency care in community, or non-Veterans Affairs (VA) settings. However, national trends in community emergency department (ED) use by veterans are unknown. To examine national, temporal trends in the frequencies and types of ED visits provided in community settings and explore the association between facilities' purchase of community care with facility and regional characteristics. Retrospective, observational cross-sectional study of ED visits over fiscal years (FY) 2016 to 2022. VA and community ED encounter data were obtained from the VA Corporate Data Warehouse and the Office of Integrated Veteran Care. Participants were veterans receiving ED care at VA facilities or paid for by the VA in the community. Data were analyzed from June to September 2023. The primary outcome measures included community ED visit volume, disposition, and payments over time. Also, the most common and costly ED visits were assessed. Negative binomial regression analysis examined associations between facility and regional characteristics and the rate of ED visits purchased in community settings relative to all ED visits. There were 19 787 056 ED visits, predominantly at VA facilities (14 532 261 visits [73.4%]), made by 3 972 503 unique veterans from FY 2016 to 2022. The majority of ED users were male (3 576 120 individuals [90.0%]), and the median (IQR) age was 63 (48-73) years. The proportion of community ED visits increased in absolute terms from 18% in FY 2016 to 37% in FY 2022. Total community ED payments, adjusted to 2021 dollars, were $1.18 billion in FY 2016 and over $6.14 billion in FY 2022. The most common reasons for ED visits in the community were for nonspecific chest pain (305 082 visits [6%]), abdominal pain (174 836 visits [3%]), and septicemia (149 968 visits [3%]). The average proportion of ED visits purchased by a VA facility increased from 14% in FY 2016 to 32% by FY 2022. In multivariable analyses, facilities with greater ED volume and low-complexity facilities had higher expected rates of community emergency care than lower volume and high-complexity facilities, respectively. As veterans increasingly use community EDs for acute, unscheduled needs, attention to factors associated with veterans' use of acute care services in different settings are important to identify access barriers and to ensure veterans' health care needs are met.

Characteristics of patients with initial diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus in emergency department and their outcomes: a retrospective single-center study.

This study aims to investigate the characteristics of patients with an initial diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in an emergency department (ED) and their outcomes. A total of 147 SLE patients (119 females and 28 males, mean age 26 ± 19 years) who visited the ED of the Peking University People's Hospital between January 2017 and June 2022 were enrolled in the study. Data on demographic information, clinical characteristics, comorbidities, therapy, and outcomes were collected. Most patients visit ED because of symptoms related to SLE (74.8%, 110/147). The remaining 37 patients (25.2%) visited ED due to infection (43.2%, 16/37), gastrointestinal bleeding (10.8%, 4/37), coronary heart or cerebrovascular disease (18.9%, 7/37), macrophage activation syndrome or thrombotic microangiopathy (18.9%, 7/37), leukemia (5.4%, 2/37), and hepatic encephalopathy (2.7%, 1/37). Of the patients, 54.4% (80/147) were first diagnosed with SLE at the time of their ED visit. Thrombocytopenia events occurred significantly more frequently in this group of patients (OR 3.664, 95% CI 1.586-8.464, p = 0.002). Pulse steroid therapy was administered to 32.5% (26/80) of the patients with an initial diagnosis of SLE, and 26.3% (21/80) of these patients also received IVIG therapy during their ED visit. SLEDAI scores were significantly decreased after 6 months of therapy. The rate of mortality was 6.8% (10/147) in the 6-month follow-up period, and all the ten deaths happened in patients with disease-established SLE. The main causes of death were infections (two patients) and SLE flare (four patients). Understanding disease patterns can contribute to physicians providing accurate diagnosis and efficient care for SLE patients in ED. Key Points • Systemic lupus erythematosus, a complex autoimmune disorder, can have either a chronic or a relapsing and remitting disease course. The disease can involve acute events or severe comorbidities, and frequent visits to the emergency department (ED) are inevitable. • It is essential to better understand which comorbidities can lead to emergency department visits. Accurate clinical diagnosis and appropriate interventions from ED physicians can have a strong impact on the prognosis of the disease. • Hematologic compromise attributed to SLE flare is the most common reason for ED visits. Owing to aggressive treatments, the clinical outcomes in patients with initial diagnosis of SLE have improved notably. • Our study highlights that early recognition and appropriate management of SLE-related conditions and other comorbidity in ED are crucial.

Unplanned emergency department visits after mastectomy in Alberta: Informing a quality improvement initiative.

412 Background: Same day surgery (SDS) for mastectomy increased in Alberta from 1.7% to 73% in 2022, after implementation of a perioperative care pathway in 2016. However, unplanned visits to the emergency department (ED) remained high at 22-27% with <5% requiring readmission. Our study aims to explore factors associated with unplanned ED visits by 1) describing patients with unplanned ED visits within 30 days of mastectomy, and 2) exploring characteristics for unplanned ED visits from the patient perspective. Methods: A survey study was conducted of patients who underwent a mastectomy in Alberta between 07/01/2021 to 06/30/2022 by a general surgeon, and had an unplanned ED visit within 30 days. Patients were identified from the CIHI database; chart review was performed to confirm ED visit details. Patients were excluded if their presentation was unrelated to surgery. Survey questions evaluated 3 domains: medical, socioeconomic, and psychologic, as well as patient-reported experiences of post-operative care. Results: Of 549 patients who underwent mastectomy during the study period, 132 (24%) presented to ED within 30 days. The survey was sent to 87 patients meeting inclusion criteria; 38% responded. Average age was 56. Most patients had no comorbidities (30%) or 2+ (27%), and 85% had prior surgery. The majority (79%) had college education or higher. Treatment included neoadjuvant chemotherapy (24%), sentinel lymph node biopsy (39%), axillary dissection (12%), concurrent reconstruction (24%), and mastectomy alone (27%). Most patients had 2+ drains (70%). Many patients (38%) presented on a weekend, 50% stating the ED was the only choice available at the time. Comparatively, 22% reported being told to go, and 16% felt the ED was the best place for their problem. Patients were seen by an ED physician (89%), nurse (40%) and/or surgeon (28%). Most common reasons for ED visit were infection (38%) and drain concerns (38%). Re-operation and readmission rates were 25% and 19%, respectively. Overall, 84% felt prepared for surgery; only 15% felt uncomfortable with drain management. Patients identified peer support and wound information as areas lacking. While 78% of patients were mostly or very satisfied with surgery, difficulty accessing their surgical team post-operatively was reported as the main flaw. Conclusions: Our study cohort identified infection and drain concerns as the most common reason for unplanned ED visit after mastectomy. Overall, patients were satisfied with education and surgical care, but identified problems with accessing medical/surgical care after discharge. Future initiatives should focus on improved access to outpatient care, and education on post-mastectomy emergencies.

Trend and Characteristics among Patients with Cancer at Emergency Department of Adam Malik General Hospital Medan

Abstract. Introduction: The prevalence of cancer cases globally is increasing rapidly, especially in emergency department (ED) visits. Usually, cancer patients come for acute signs and symptoms of a still undiagnosed malignancy, management of treatment-related side effects, co-morbidities, and palliative care. Objective: To identify the demographic characteristics of cancer patients, reasons for ED visits, and associated factors of oncologic patients. Methods: A prospective cross-sectional study was conducted from July 2022 - June 2023 at the ED of H. Adam Malik Hospital Medan with 392 oncologic patients. Data were collected using the Integrated System Application of Hospital (STARS) database. Results: The percentage of women (69%) was two times higher than men (31%), with 82% being 18-64 years old. Breast was the most common location of malignancy for 21.4%, followed by gastrointestinal malignancy for 20.1%. The most common reason for ED visits was pain, followed by gastrointestinal symptoms. The ratio of patients who were discharged and hospitalized was 50:50, while the mortality rate was none. Conclusion: The most common primary diagnosis was breast malignancy in women and gastrointestinal malignancy in men. The majority of ED visits were for the management of treatment-related side effects and palliative care.

Postpartum Emergency Department Visits and Risk Factors for Readmission [ID: 1363150

INTRODUCTION: Postpartum emergency department (ED) visits complicate 12% of births. We aimed to characterize trends in ED visits and risk factors for readmission. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study on postpartum ED visits within 42 days of delivery at a tertiary care center over 1 year. Readmitted patients were compared to those who remained outpatient as appropriate. IRB #14-001098. RESULTS: Of 3,084 deliveries, 138 (4.5%) patients presented to the ED for total 157 encounters. 17 (12.3%) patients presented more than once. 55 (35%) ED visits resulted in readmission, with 4 patients readmitted twice. Public insurance rates in the cohort were significantly higher than baseline (16.7% versus 8.5%, P=.001). Postpartum hypertension (HTN) was the most common reason for ED visits (40%) and had four times higher likelihood of being readmitted (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 4.076, 95% CI 2.04–8.15, P<.001). Black women were six times more likely to be readmitted compared to other groups (aOR 6.53, 95% CI 1.26–33.88, P=.026). Coexistent psychiatric disease had lower likelihood of readmission (aOR 0.43, 95% CI 0.19–0.95, P=.037). Having more than one ED visit led to fivefold higher odds of readmission (aOR 5.05, 95% CI 1.66–15.32, P=.004). Median days from delivery to ED visit were 8 (interquartile range [IQR]: 5, 15). CONCLUSION: Seventy-three percent of presentations to the ED were within 2 weeks of delivery, and postpartum HTN was the leading cause. Black patients were more likely to be readmitted. Further studies are needed to evaluate whether earlier postpartum visits for high-risk groups may reduce ED visits and readmissions.

Trends in Emergency Department Visits, and Hospital Admissions Pre- and During Covid 19 Pandemic

Background: During the COVID-19 pandemic period, the unnecessary use of the emergency department (ED) affects the motivation of health care providers leading the healthcare services to be far from being efficient, delays the care of the patients having an actual emergency situation and reduces the quality of education in teaching clinics. 
 Methods: Diagnoses in the visits were classified based on International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) categories and were analyzed into subgroups based on common reasons for ED visits. 
 Results: While the number of ED visits in the first year of the pandemic period decreased by 26% compared to the previous year, the frequency of admissions in the circulatory system (CS), stomach and intestinal system (SIS), nervous system (NS), trauma (T), infectious disease (ID), endocrine system (ES), muscular system and connective tissues (MCT), gynecology and pregnancy (GP), environmental emergency (EE), mental and behavioral disorders (MBD), examination and encounter for administrative purposes (EEAP) was higher than expected and the frequency of admission and referral was also significantly more than the expected value (P < 0.001). 
 Conclusion: In addition to the significant decrease in the number of ED visits during the pandemic, the fact that higher admission and referral frequency were observed indicating that the patients visited the emergency service in the late phases with severe clinical conditions. 
 
 
 Key Words: COVID-19 pandemic, Emergency Departments, ICD Codes, Patient Admission, Outpatients,

Epidemiologic Analysis Of Adolescent Track & Field Related Emergency Department Visits

PURPOSE: Track and field (T&F) is the most popular high school sport in the United States with close to 1.1 million participants. T&F athletes experience many health benefits of sport participation; however, they are also confronted by injury risks associated with the sport. With steady growth in T&F participation over the last 20 years, it is important to analyze serious injuries that may affect T&F participants’ future health. The purpose of this study is to examine adolescent T&F athletes’ emergency department (ED) visits from a nationally representative sample of hospitals. METHODS: Data from the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System was used to describe the types of T&F injuries that resulted in ED visits among adolescents aged 14-18 between the years 2000 and 2019. The total number of ED visits were reported and a national estimate of T&F related ED visits was calculated. The most frequent injury diagnoses were reported, as were the most frequent diagnoses resulting in hospital admission. Injuries during 2018 and 2019 were categorized and reported by the type of T&F activity adolescents were engaged in at their time of injury. RESULTS: During the study period NEISS recorded 8,105 T&F related ED visits, suggesting an estimated 274,630 visits nationally over the same timeframe (95% CI: 164,721 384,539). The most common diagnoses evaluated in the ED were ankle sprains (n = 1,100, 13.6%), knee sprains (n = 626, 7.72%), and lower trunk strains (n = 542, 6.69%). One-hundred and ninety-six of the observations led to hospital admission (2.42% of all visits). Hospital admissions were most commonly due to fractures (n = 85, 43.4%), internal injuries (n = 23, 11.7%), and heat-related illnesses (n = 7, 3.6%). Over the last two years of the study period, the most common T&F activities associated with ED visits were track running (n = 507, 52.4%), cross country running (n = 108, 11.2%), hurdling (n = 88, 9.09%), jumping (n = 49, 5.06%), pole vaulting (n = 27, 2.79%), and throwing events (n = 25, 2.58%). CONCLUSIONS: This study describes the most common reasons for ED visits and hospital admissions among adolescent T&F athletes over the last 20 years. A variety of injuries involving multiple levels of severity were observed. Ankle sprains were the most common reason for ED visit and fractures accounted for the most hospital admissions.

Emergency Department Utilization by Patients With Eating Disorders: A National Population-Based Study.

BackgroundThere is a scarcity of national United States (U.S) data on emergency department (ED) utilization by patients with eating disorders. This study aims to determine the most common reasons for ED visits of patients with eating disorders, as well as baseline characteristics of patients who present due to eating disorders.MethodsWe obtained data from the Nationwide Emergency Department Sample (NEDS), the largest all-payer ED database in the United States. Each ED visit in NEDS 2018 can have only one "principal" diagnosis, which is the main reason for the visit and up to 34 "secondary" diagnoses. We abstracted data for all ED visits with "any" diagnosis of an eating disorder, using the ICD-10 code "F50". We highlighted the 10 most common "principal" diagnoses based on the organ system involved and the 10 most specific "principal" diagnoses for all ED visits by patients with any diagnosis of eating disorder. We then highlighted baseline characteristics of ED visits with a "principal" diagnosis of an eating disorder.ResultsThere were a total of 56,901 ED visits for patients with eating disorders in 2018. Among these, 7,979 had an eating disorder as the "principal" diagnosis. Patients who visited the ED principally for eating disorders were more likely to be young females and came from higher-income households; about a third were admitted with 22.1 million U.S. dollars in aggregate ED charges. Mental disorders, and injuries and poisoning were the most common principal diagnosis by organ system categories, while eating disorders, major depression disorder (MDD), hypokalemia, and dehydration are common specific reasons for ED visits among patients with eating disorders.ConclusionsEating disorders, and its medical complications and psychiatric comorbidities such as MDD are common reasons for ED visits among patients with eating disorders. Management of the underlying eating disorder and their psychiatric comorbidities through a multidisciplinary approach in the outpatient setting is invaluable in reducing ED utilization by these patients.

Patterns of First-Line Systemic Therapy Delivery and Outcomes in Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer in Ontario.

Background: First-line treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) consists of a combination of cytoreductive surgery and platinum-based chemotherapy. Recently, targeted therapies such as bevacizumab have been shown to improve oncologic outcomes in a subset of a high-risk population. The objective of this study is to evaluate the patterns of practice and outcomes of first-line systemic treatment of advanced EOC, focusing on the adoption of bevacizumab. Methods: A population cohort study was conducted using administrative data in Ontario, Canada. Patients diagnosed with advanced stage non-mucinous EOC between 2014 and 2018 were identified. Datasets were linked to obtaining information on first-line treatment including surgery, systemic therapy, providers of care, systemic therapy facilities, and acute care utilization (emergency department (ED) visits and hospitalizations) during systemic treatment. Multivariate logistic regression was used to determine factors associated with systemic therapy utilization. Results: Among 3726 patients with advanced EOC, 2838 (76%) received chemotherapy: 1316 (47%) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, 1060 (37%) underwent primary cytoreductive surgery followed by chemotherapy, and 462 (16%) received chemotherapy only. The median age was 67 (range: 20–100). Most chemotherapies were prescribed by gynecologic oncologists (60%) and in level 1 academic cancer centres (58%). Only 54 patients (3.1%) received bevacizumab in the first-line setting after its approval in Ontario in 2016. Bevacizumab was more likely to be administered by medical oncologists compared to gynecologic oncologists (OR 3.95, 95% CI 2.11–7.14). In total, 1561 (55%) and 1594 (56%) patients had at least one ED visit and/or hospitalization during systemic treatment, respectively. The most common reasons for ED visits were fever and bowel obstruction. Conclusion: Patterns of care for EOC in Ontario differed between care providers. The uptake of bevacizumab for first-line treatment of EOC was low. Acute care utilization related to EOC was high.

Radial head arthroplasty: a descriptive study of 970 patients in an integrated health care system.

Radial head arthroplasty (RHA) is commonly performed for isolated comminuted radial head fractures and in conjunction with traumatic elbow instability. However, there is a paucity of literature directly describing the characteristics and outcomes of patients who undergo RHA in a community-based setting. We describe a cohort of 970 RHA performed in the California regions of a US integrated health care system over a 9-year period. Patient demographics, implant selection, 90-day acute postoperative events, and cumulative reoperation/revision rates are included. Patients aged ≥18 years who underwent primary RHA were identified (2009-2017). Patient characteristics and demographics, including age, body mass index, gender, diabetes status, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification, primary diagnosis, and concomitant procedures were described. Crude cumulative revision and reoperation probabilities were calculated as 1 minus the Kaplan-Meier estimator, with follow-up time calculated as the time from the index RHA to revision/reoperation date for those with the outcome of interest and time from index RHA to censoring date (eg, date of death, health care termination, study end date [March 31, 2018]) for those without the outcome. Ninety-day postoperative incidence of emergency department (ED) visit, readmission, and mortality was calculated as the number of patients with the event of interest over the number of patients at risk. A total of 970 patients underwent primary unilateral RHA by 205 surgeons during the study period. Annual procedure volume increased from 53 procedures in 2009 to 157 procedures in 2017. More patients were female, without diabetes, and had an ASA classification of 1 or 2. Fracture was the predominant indication for RHA (98.4%) and more than half (54.3%) had concomitant procedures performed. Most implants were press fit (63.2%) over loose fit, and >90% were monopolar. Three-year cumulative revision and reoperation probabilities following RHA were 6.5% (95% confidence interval [CI]=5.0%-8.5%) and 8.2% (95% CI=6.5%-10.3%), respectively. Revisions and reoperations tended to occur within the first postoperative year. Of the 970 RHA patients, 83 (8.5%) had a 90-day ED visit, 58 (6.0%) had a 90-day readmission, and 1 (0.1%) died within a 90-day postoperative period. This large cohort of RHA patients provides information about the practice of RHA at large and in the community. Surgeons are performing more RHA over time and choosing press fit stems more often. Revisions and reoperations tended to occur early. Readmission and ED visits were low but not negligible, with pain being the most common reason for ED visit.

Emergency department utilization in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a nationwide population-based study

Despite the increasing burden of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) on healthcare resources, data on emergency department (ED) utilization in HCM are lacking. This nationwide population-based study extracted 14,542 HCM patients from the National Health Insurance Service database between 2015–2016, and investigated their ED utilization during a one-year period. The reason for ED utilization was defined as the primary diagnosis upon discharge from EDs. The clinical outcome was defined as hospitalization or all-cause mortality within 90 days after the ED visits. A total of 3209 (22.1%) HCM patients visited EDs within a one-year period (mean age, 66.8 ± 13.8 years; male, 57.4%). The majority (71.1%) of HCM patients who visited the EDs were aged ≥ 60 years. The ED utilization rate was higher in women than in men (26.3% versus 19.7%, P < 0.001). Cardiovascular diseases were the most common reason for ED visits (n = 1333, 41.5%). Among HCM patients who visited EDs, 1195 (37.2%) were hospitalized, and 231 (7.2%) died within 90 days. ED visits for cardiovascular disease was associated with a higher 90-day all-cause mortality (adjusted odds ratio, 2.72; 95% confidence interval 1.79–4.12). These findings would serve as a basis for future research to establish medical policies on ED utilization in HCM.

Risk Factors and Reasons for Emergency Department Visits Within 30 Days of Elective Hand Surgery: An Analysis of 3,261 Patients.

Background: The frequency of hand and elbow surgeries occurring in outpatient and elective settings is on the rise. Emergency department (ED) visits in the postoperative period are increasingly used as quality measures for surgical care. The aim of this study is to determine the number of postoperative ED visits, the primary reason for these visits, and to identify risk factors associated with these visits. Methods: We examined all elective hand and elbow procedures performed at two hospitals within a single healthcare network between 2008 and 2017. A total of 3,261 patients met the study criteria. Descriptive statistics were calculated for our population, followed by univariate and multivariate analyses, to identify risk and protective factors associated with ED visits in the first 30 days after surgery. Results: Eighty-seven of 3,261 patients presented to the ED within 30 days of their operation (2.7%). The most common reasons for ED visits were related to pain (28.7%), swelling (26.4%), and concerns for infection (20.7%). Univariate analysis indicated history of drug use, number of procedures, smoking history, and serum albumin <3.5 mg/dL as risk factors for returns to the ED. Multivariate analysis identified history of drug use, number of procedures, and serum albumin <3.5 mg/dL as independent risk factors. Smoking history failed to achieve statistical significance as an independent risk factor. Both univariate and multivariate analyses identified age >60 years as protective for postoperative ED visits. Conclusions: ED visits within the first 30 days after elective hand surgery are relatively common, despite remarkably low complication rates among these procedures. This information may help to improve risk stratification in these patients, and to aid in the development of enhanced postoperative follow-up strategies to reduce unnecessary utilization of emergency medical services. Level of Evidence: Level III (Therapeutic).

Patients with autism in the emergency department: cause of admissions and challenges

Objective: This study aims to understand the presentations of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) patients in a tertiary hospital’s emergency department (ED) in Turkey, and the difficulties of families face in the ED. Method: Clinical characteristics of ASD patients who presented to the ED between 1 January 2015 and 15 November 2020 were obtained by retrospective file review. The caregivers of the patients who had presented to the ED in 2020 were interviewed by a phone call. Results: There were 740 applications of 224 patients (192 boys, 32 girls). Almost half of the patients were between 0 and 5 years old. Respiratory problems were the most common cause of admissions in all age groups. The second common reasons for ED visits were gastrointestinal problems in 0–5 years old, traumatic injuries/poisoning in 6–12 years old, and epilepsy/syncope in 13–17 years old. Psychiatric problems were less common (2.7%) than other reasons for admission. The most challenging issue for children was “the crowded waiting area, and the long waiting period” and followed by “physical restraint imposed on the child,” “noise,” and “bright light.” Conclusion: As the clinicians’ awareness and use of more accurate diagnostic tools have increased, the ASD prevalence has gradually increased. To increase the quality of healthcare services for these patients, awareness studies and new interventions are needed.

Analysis of reasons for Emergency Department (ED) visits and subsequent hospital admissions in patients with solid malignancies: A retrospective study from a cancer center in rural Maine.

241 Background: Reducing ED visits in patients with cancer is cost saving and is particularly relevant during the COVID pandemic. We aim to identify patterns of ED visits among various cancer patients and reduce preventable ED visits and hospital admissions. Methods: We analyzed the number of ED visits and hospital admissions that occurred in patients with breast, lung, and Gastrointestinal (GI) cancers between July12019 and October31 2020 including demographics, stage, treatment type preceding the month of ED visit, reason, time of the day, day of the week the visit occurred. Results: 308 patients had 519 ED visits, 111 breast cancer patients had 184, 102 lung cancer patients had 186 and 95 GI cancer patients had 149 ED visits. 38% had &gt; 1 visit. 51%, (37% breast, 60% Lung and 58 % GI cancer) had stage 4 disease at the time of visit. There were no visits in the month of May 2020. 275 (53%) visits required hospital admissions, 60% of ED visits in lung cancer, 54% in GI and 46 % in breast cancer patients required hospitalization. Most common reason for ED visits in breast cancer patients was fall/injury (20%), with median age of 71 years, none were cancer/ chemotherapy induced. Among lung and GI cancer patients respiratory (24%) and GI related (24%) symptoms were the most common reasons respectively, majority were cancer/chemotherapy related. Most common symptoms requiring hospital admissions were respiratory 21%, GI 18%, cardiac 12%. 11% and 9% of ED visits were due to fall/injury and cancer related pain, of these 3.6% and 9% resulted in hospital admissions respectively. Lung and GI cancer patients were more likely to be referred to the ED from the oncologist office (23%) than breast cancer patients (11%). Conclusions: Reasons for ED visits vary by tumor types and some may be preventable. Fall/injury in breast cancer patients and cancer related pain in lung and GI cancer patients were frequent reasons for preventable ED visits. In lung and GI cancer patients, cancer/chemotherapy related respiratory, GI symptoms are felt to be less avoidable since they may be related to disease progression or presenting symptoms. We have initiated several strategies such as ‘’systematic physical therapy assessment’’ of our breast cancer patients over age 70 to reduce ED visits due to fall/injury. We are developing strategies to involve palliative care early to reduce the number of ED visits related to cancer related pain We now have “call us first campaign” to assess and intervene before going to ED since most visits occurred during working hours.[Table: see text]

Unplanned emergency department visits and hospital admissions of older adults under treatment for cancer in the ambulatory/community setting.

This study aims to identify the incidence and risk/protective factors for (1) unplanned emergency department (ED) visits and hospital admissions (HA) and (2) nausea/vomiting/dehydration (NVD) at time of treatment in older adults under treatment for cancer. This is a exploratory retrospective cohort study of adults (60 and older) with cancer. Adults were included if they had a new cancer diagnosis and were being treated with chemotherapy. Study outcomes included the number of ED visits and HA (cycles 1-4) and NVD at the time of receiving chemotherapy (cycles 2-4). Repeated measures, Poisson regression was used to obtain risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals for independent predictors of outcomes. Of 402 study participants, 20% experienced an ED visit, and 18% experienced a HA. Common reasons for ED visits were pain (23.5%) and NVD (20.4%). Common reasons for HA were infection (34.4%) and NVD (22.2%). Multivariate analysis showed risk factors for ED visits included chemotherapy cycle 1, having esophageal cancer, being treated with ≥ 3 chemotherapy agents, and increasing levels of functional impairment. Risk factors for HA included chemotherapy cycle 1, increasing levels of functional impairment, intravenous fluids between treatment, and being prescribed antiemetics for home use. Predictors of NVD at time of chemotherapy treatment included Hispanic ethnicity, insurance status, cancer type, chemotherapy emetic potent, treatment frequency, intravenous fluids between cycles, and number of home antiemetics. Unplanned ED visits and HA occur in older adults under treatment for cancer due to numerous treatment-related side effects. Helping older adults identify and manage side effects early may reduce the number of unplanned admissions.

Long-term Emergency Department Visits and Readmissions After Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: a Systematic Review

PurposeThere is considerable evidence on short-term outcomes after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB), but data on long-term outcome is scarce, especially on postoperative emergency department (ED) visits and readmissions. We aim to systematically review evidence on the incidence, indications, and risk factors of ED visits and readmissions beyond 30 days after LRYGB.Materials and MethodsA systematic search in PubMed, Scopus, Embase.com, Cochrane Library, and PsycINFO was performed. All studies reporting ED visits and readmissions > 30 days after LRYGB, with ≥ 50 patients, were included. PRISMA statement was used and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for quality assessment.ResultsTwenty articles were included. Six studies reported on ED visits (n = 2818) and 19 on readmissions (n = 276,543). The rate of patients with an ED visit within 90 days after surgery ranged from 3.9 to 32.6%. ED visits at 1, 2, and 3 years occurred in 25.6%, 30.0%, and 31.1% of patients. Readmissions within 90 days and at 1-year follow-up ranged from 4.1 to 20.5% and 4.75 to 16.6%, respectively. Readmission was 29% at 2 years and 23.9% at 4.2 years of follow-up. The most common reason for ED visits and readmissions was abdominal pain.ConclusionEmergency department visits and readmissions have been reported in up to almost one in three patients on the long-term after LRYGB. Both are mainly indicated for abdominal pain. The report on indications and risk factors is very concise. A better understanding of ED visits and readmissions after LRYGB is warranted to improve long-term care, in particular for patients with abdominal pains.

Reasons and Risk Factors for Emergency Department Visits After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: An Analysis of 1.3 Million Patients

BackgroundWell-powered studies investigating the relationship of emergency department (ED) visits and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are limited. Therefore, the specific aims of this study were to: 1) compare patient demographics of patients who did and did not have an ED visit; and for the visits, identified: 2) leading reasons; and 3) risk factors for ED visits (prearthroplasty/postarthroplasty). MethodsPatients undergoing primary TKA who had an ED visit within 90 days after their index procedure were identified from a nationwide database. The query yielded 1,364,655 patients who did (n = 5689) and did not have (n = 1,358,966) an ED visit. Baseline demographics such as age, sex, and comorbidity prevalence between the two cohorts; reasons for ED visits; and prearthroplasty and postarthroplasty risk factors were analyzed. Odds ratios (ORs) of ED visits were assessed using multivariate binomial logistic regression analyses. A P-value less than 0.001 was considered statistically significant. ResultsPatients who did and did not have ED visits differed with respect to age (P < .0001) and mean Elixhauser Comorbidity Index scores (9 vs 6, P < .0001). Musculoskeletal etiologies were the most common reason for ED visits. Hypertension was the greatest contributor to ED visits prearthroplasty and postarthroplasty. Comorbid conditions associated with ED visits postarthroplasty included peripheral vascular disease (OR: 1.61, P < .0001), coagulopathy (OR: 1.58, P < .0001), and rheumatoid arthritis (OR: 1.56, P < .0001). ConclusionBy identifying demographic patterns of patients, reasons, and risk factors, the information found from this study can help identify targets for quality improvement to potentially reduce the incidence of ED visits after primary TKA.