Common Hematologic Adverse Events Research Articles

Tolerability of the niraparib individualized starting dose in the PRIMA/ENGOT-OV26/GOG-3012 trial of niraparib first-line maintenance therapy

PurposeTo explore safety and tolerability parameters for the niraparib individualized starting dose (ISD) in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer that responded to platinum-based chemotherapy who participated in the phase 3 PRIMA/ENGOT-OV26/GOG-3012 trial (NCT02655016). MethodsThe PRIMA protocol was amended so newly enrolled patients received an ISD based on baseline body weight/platelet count. In this ad hoc analysis, the timing, duration, and resolution of the first occurrence of common any-grade hematologic (thrombocytopenia, anemia, neutropenia) and nonhematologic (nausea, asthenia/fatigue, constipation, insomnia, hypertension) treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were evaluated by treatment arm in the ISD safety population (data cutoff, November 17, 2021; median follow-up, 3.5 years). ResultsOf 733 randomized patients, 255 were enrolled after the ISD protocol amendment and received ≥ 1 dose of study treatment (niraparib, 169; placebo, 86). In the niraparib arm, median times to first events were 22.0–35.0 days for hematologic TEAEs and 7.0–56.0 days for nonhematologic TEAEs. First events resolved in ≥ 89.8% of patients for hematologic TEAEs; for nonhematologic TEAEs, resolution rates ranged from 55.3% (insomnia) to 86.0% (nausea). Median durations of first hematologic TEAEs were ≤ 16.0 days, but for first nonhematologic TEAEs ranged from 18.0 days (nausea) to 134.0 days (insomnia). ConclusionThe niraparib ISD was generally well tolerated and TEAEs were manageable. Common hematologic and nonhematologic TEAEs occurred early and first events of hematologic TEAEs had a short duration (≈ 2 weeks) and a high resolution rate. These findings support close monitoring immediately following niraparib initiation and may help inform patient expectations for niraparib safety.

The Effecacy and Safety of Daratumumab Based Regimens in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: A Single-Center Real-World Data Analysis

To investigate the efficacy and safety of daratumumab based regimens in relapse and/or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) in the real world, as well as the impact of daratumumab on stem cell collection and engraftment. The clinical data of patients with RRMM who received daratumumab in hematology department of the First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University from February 2019 to March 2023 and had evaluable efficacy were retrospective analysis. All 43 RRMM patients were treated with daratumumab-based combination regimens, including Dd, DVd, DRd, Dkd, DId, and Dara-DECP. With median follow-up time 10.1 (2.1-36.6) months, the best overall response rate (ORR) was 74.4% and a best complete response rate (CR) was 25.6%. 1-year overall survival rate (OS) was 84.5%. The most common severe hematologic adverse events (Grade>3) are 3/4 grade leukopenia（18.6%）, and the most common severe non-hematologic adverse events were infusion-related reactions (IRRs， 20.9%) and infections（7.0%）. Multivariate prognostic analysis showed that extramedullary infiltration was an independent adverse prognostic factor affecting OS （P =0.004）. The use of daratumumab has no effect on stem cell collection, or engraftment. Daratumumab is safe and effective in RRMM.

BeEAM vs. BEAM: evaluating conditioning regimens for autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with relapsed or refractory DLBCL.

To evaluate whether BeEAM is an alternative to BEAM for autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Data of 60 patients with relapsed or refractory DLBCL who underwent ASCT from January 2018 to June 2023 in our center, including 30 patients in the BeEAM group and 30 patients in the BEAM group, were retrospectively analyzed. The time to hematopoietic reconstitution, treatment-related adverse events, number of hospitalization days, hospitalization cost, and survival benefit were compared between the two groups. The clinical characteristics of the patients did not significantly differ between the two groups. The median number of reinfused CD34 + cells was 5.06 × 106/kg and 5.17 × 106/kg in the BeEAM and BEAM groups, respectively, which did not significantly different (p = 0.8829). In the BeEAM and BEAM groups, the median time to neutrophil implantation was 10.2 and 10.27 days, respectively (p = 0.8253), and the median time to platelet implantation was 13.23 and 12.87 days, respectively (p = 0.7671). In the BeEAM and BEAM groups, the median hospitalization duration was 30.37 and 30.57 days, respectively (p = 0.9060), and the median hospitalization cost was RMB 83,425 and RMB 96,235, respectively (p = 0.0560). The hospitalization cost was lower in the BeEAM group. The most common hematologic adverse events were grade ≥ 3 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, whose incidences were similar in the two groups. The most common non-hematologic adverse events were ≤ grade 2 and the incidences of these events did not significantly differ between the two groups. Median overall survival was not reached in either group, with predicted 5-year overall survival of 72.5% and 60% in the BeEAM and BEAM groups, respectively (p = 0.5872). Five-year progression-free survival was 25% and 20% in the BeEAM and BEAM groups, respectively (p = 0.6804). As a conditioning regimen for relapsed or refractory DLBCL, BeEAM has a desirable safety profile and is well tolerated, and its hematopoietic reconstitution time, number of hospitalization days, and survival benefit are not inferior to those of BEAM. BeEAM has a lower hospitalization cost and is an alternative to BEAM.

Selinexor, daratumumab, bortezomib and dexamethasone for the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: results of the phase II, nonrandomized, multicenter GEM-SELIBORDARA study.

The treatment landscape for multiple myeloma has significantly evolved in the last decade. Notwithstanding, a large proportion of patients continue to relapse and novel combinations continue to be needed. In this phase II study, selinexor, a first-in-class inhibitor of exportin-1 was evaluated in combination with standard daratumumab-bortezomib-dexamethasone (DVd), for the treatment of relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). The aim of the trial was to assess the efficacy and safety of the combination of selinexor with DVd (S-DVd). A total of 57 patients were enrolled in the two parts of the study. Part 1 enrolled a heavily pretreated population with at least three prior lines (PL) of therapy and part 2 enrolled an early relapse population with at least one PL of therapy. The primary endpoint was complete response (CR) rate in part 2 and overall response rate (ORR) in part 1. In the latter, 24 patients were treated with a median of three PL. Overall response rate (ORR) was 50% with two CR. Median progression- free survival (PFS) was 7 months. In part 2, 33 patients were enrolled, with a median of one PL. ORR was 82% and CR or better was 33%. Median PFS was 24 months. In lenalidomide-refractory patients, a median PFS of 22.1 months was observed. Thrombocytopenia was the most common hematological adverse event (69%; grade 3-4: 34%) and nausea, the most frequent non-hematological adverse event (38%; grade 3-4: 6%). Sixty-two percent of the patients required dose modifications. In summary, although the primary endpoint of the study was not met, the combination of S-DVd showed encouraging clinical efficacy with a generally manageable safety profile representing a potential option for the treatment of RRMM patients.

Efficacy and Safety of Low-Dose Venetoclax Combined with Voriconazole Inpatients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia Unfit for Intensive Chemotherapy

Background: Venetoclax combined with hypomethylating agents is the standard regime for elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia unfit for intensive induction therapy. Nevertheless, many patients struggle with finances and forgo treatments due to the high costs of venetoclax. Concurrent application of venetoclax and CYP3A4 inhibitors such as voriconazole in low-income patients maybe is a feasible strategy to reduce the dose of ventoclax. Methods: We conducted a single-institutional, non-randomized, open-label, prospective study. Between June 2020 and March 2023, 57 elderly or unfit patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia at the first affiliated hospital of Anhui medical university were enrolled. Twenty-three patients received low-dose venetoclax plus voriconazole plus azacitidine (cohort 1), whereas another 34 patients received standard dose venetoclax plus azacitidine (cohort 2). The efficacy of the two regimes between cohorts was analyzed and compared, the peak venetoclax concentration (C max) and side effects of the patients were also detected. Results: Totally, there were 35 males and 22 females, with a median age of 67 (range 46-91) years old. 86% (49/57) of patients were adverse/intermediate risk in the whole cohort. The baseline characteristics were all balanced differently between the two cohorts. The venetoclax Cmax in cohort 1 was 1930±225ng/mL, whereas the venetoclax Cmax in cohort 2 was 2371±274ng/mL, there was no significant difference between the two cohorts ( P＝0.3138). The overall response rates were 91% (21/23) and 85% (29/34) in cohort 1 and cohort 2, respectively ( P＝0.0834). At a median of 16 months of follow-up, the median progression-free survivals were 16 and 12 months in two cohorts, respectively ( P＝0.2651) with a hazard ratio of 0.6507. The median overall survivals were not reached and 14 months in the two cohorts, respectively ( P＝0.4636) with a hazard ratio of 0.7466. The most common hematological adverse events were neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and anemia, whereas the most frequent non-hematological adverse events include infections, vomiting, diarrhea, and hypokalemia. Conclusions: The combination of low-dose venetoclax and voriconazole is well tolerated and effective in unfit AML patients. Concurrent application of venetoclax provided a feasible and sustainable strategy for low-income patients. Keywords: Venetoclax, low-dose, voriconazole, Unfit, Acute myeloid leukemia

Evaluating Effectiveness and Safety of Flumatinib for Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in (CML-CP) without Optimal Response (Warning, Failure) to Imatinib or/and Dasatinib

Introduction Flumatinib is a novel second-generation BCR-ABL1 targeted kinase inhibitors (TKI) with better efficacy and safety than first generation TKIs in first-line treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP). In the previous phase III study, newly diagnosed CML-CP patients receiving flumatinib achieved higher treatment responses and safety than imatinib. When it comes to the patients not achieving the optimal response to TKIs, flumatinib is potentially a better option, nonetheless the robust evidence is unavailable. This study reports the effectiveness and safety of switching to flumatinib in patients who have not achieved the optimal molecular response to imatinib or/and dasatinib. Methods This prospective, multicentre study enrolled Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive (Ph+) CML-CP patients aged ≥18 years and who failed to achieve the optimal response with imatinib or/and dasatinib between March 2021 to October 2022. All patients were treated with flumatinib 600 mg once a day and followed up to 24 months. The primary endpoint of the study was rate of major molecular response (MMR) at 12 months as defined by European LeukemiaNet 2020 recommendations (BCR-ABL1 transcript level ≤0.1% in peripheral blood on RT-PCR assay on International Scale [IS]) and safety was the secondary endpoint assessed with CTCAE 4.03 version. In addition, the optimal molecular response in either the warning or failure patients was evaluated at 3, 6 and 12 months respectively, after switching to flumatinib, and the difference in effectiveness was also analyzed from the available mutation subtypes. Results Overall, 94 patients with Ph+ CML-CP were included in the study. The median (range) age of the patients were 53 (19.0-84.0) years old and 61.7% of the patients were males. A total of 38 (40.4%) patients reported warning response from the previous TKIs whereas 56 (59.6%) of patients reported treatment failure to the previous TKIs. Seventy-seven (81.9%) patients have been treated with one TKI, either imatinib or dasatinib, and 17 (18.1%) have been treated with both prior to the study. Overall, 25 (54%) patients achieved MMR at 12-months follow-up compared to the baseline (Figure 1). The rates of optimal molecular response at 3- and 6-months were also improved compared to the baseline. The optimal molecular response was 76(88%) at 3 months, and 52(73%) at 6 months. Subgroup analysis with previous response to TKIs revealed that flumatinib improved the rates of optimal molecular response in both warning and failure groups. Switching to flumatinib from imatinib or/and dasatinib have been reported with an enhanced optimal molecular response in patients who experienced warning compared with those who had treatment failure after the TKIs with 38 (100%) vs 38 (79%), 29 (91%) vs 23 (59%) and 15 (68%) vs 10 (42%) at 3-, 6- and 12-months respectively (Figure 2). Similarly, the rates of optimal molecular response were improved in patients without mutations compared to those having mutations, 65 (90%) vs 9 (75%) at 3 months, 46 (77%) vs 5 (56%) at 6 months and 23 (59%) vs 1 (20%) at 12 months respectively. The most common adverse events (AEs) were diarrhea in 17 (18%), rash in 11 (12%), bloating in 11 (12%), and thrombocytopenia in 11 (12%) patients. Common hematological AEs of grade 3/4 were thrombocytopenia in 7 (7%), anemia in 3 (3%) and leucopenia in 1 (1%) patients. Conclusion For Ph+ CML-CP patients without the optimal molecular response in previous imatinib or/and dasatinib, flumatinib is a better alternative to the existing treatments. In addition, if the patients were switched to flumatinib earlier, the optimal response was achieved faster. The grade 3/4 AEs were mainly hematologically related, whereas the gastrointestinal events were mostly of grade 1-2.

Methotrexate in Combination with Orelabrutinib, Thiotepa, and Rituximab (R-MTO) Followed By Autologous Stem-Cell Transplant for Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma Treatment

Background: Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is a rare, aggressive B-cell malignancy. Despite the possibility of a cure, the prognosis remains poor. The standard treatment includes high-dose methotrexate and rituximab, followed by consolidation with either whole-brain radiation therapy or autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). However, there is still no clear consensus on the best treatment approach. To improve outcomes, we incorporated thiotepa chemotherapy, which has shown promising activity in inhibiting tumor growth by disrupting DNA bonds, into the regimen. Additionally, we introduced orelabrutinib, a novel and potent BTK inhibitor with high cerebrospinal fluid concentrations, which has demonstrated efficacy in treating PCNSL. In light of these findings, we conducted a clinical study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a combination regimen of thiotepa, orelabrutinib, and methotrexate with rituximab (R-MTO) followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in patients with PCNSL. Methods: This is an ongoing, single-center, single-arm, open-label study conducted between April 2022 and July 2023. The study enrolled patients aged 18-80 years diagnosed with PCNSL. The patients received 5-8 cycles of R-MTO regimen as induction therapy, consisting of rituximab 375 mg/m 2 iv on day 0, MTX 3.5 g/m 2 iv on day1, thiotepa, 30-40 mg/m 2 on day 4 and orelabrutinib 150 mg qd po for 3 weeks per cycle). After completing the R-MTO therapy, patients were proposed to receive orelabrutinib monotherapy as maintenance treatment for up to 2 years. The efficacy was assessed by MRI/PET per the International PCNSL Collaborative Group (IPCG) criteria. Patients who did not experience disease progression subsequently underwent consolidation treatment with high-dose chemotherapy (HCT) plus ASCT. The HCT regimen involved busulfan 3.2 mg/kg on days -5, -4, thiotepa 250 mg/m 2 on days -7 and -6, cytarabine 2g/m 2 q12h on days -3 and -2, followed by reinfusion of stem cells on day 0. The primary endpoint of the study was progression-free survival (PFS) at 2 years, evaluated by intention-to-treat (ITT). Secondary endpoints included complete response (CR) rate, overall response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS) and toxicities. Results: Between April 2022 and July 2023, a total of 19 patients with PCNSL were enrolled in our study, including 16 who were newly diagnosed and had not received any prior treatment. The median age of the patients was 62 years, ranging from 31 to 72, with 9 out of 19 (47.37%) being male. By the data cutoff, all the patients had completed 4 cycles of treatment. Additionally, 8 out of 19 (42.11%) patients had completed six cycles of treatment, and 2 out of 19 (10.52%) patients had completed 7 to 8 cycles of treatment. The ORR was 94.73% (18/19), and the CR rate was 89.47% (17/19) after 4 cycles of treatment. However, one patient with a P53 mutation progressed after 2 cycles of treatment and unfortunately died 3.8 months after diagnosis. Among the six patients who underwent autologous HSCT, all of them (100%) remained in CR. One patient died due to a COVID-19 infection after 6 cycles of R-MTO and ASCT. The most common hematological adverse events associated with the R-MTO regimen were mild to moderate (grade 1-2) decreases in neutrophil count, which typically resolved within a few days. Conclusions: The R-MTO induction treatment has demonstrated notable efficacy in achieving higher response rates among patients with PCNSL, and the associated adverse events are manageable.

Tafasitamab and Lenalidomide in Relapsed/Refractory B-Cell Lymphoma: A Multicenter Retrospective Real-World-Study of Patients from Germany and Austria

Background Publication of the L-MIND-study led to the approval of tafasitamab/lenalidomide (TL) for patients with relapsed oder refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (r/r DLBCL), who were ineligible for autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT). The findings of the L-MIND-study showed an overall response rate (ORR) of 60%, complete response rate (CRR) of 43%, median progression free survival (PFS) of 12.1 months, and median overall survival (OS) of 33.5 months. To analyze the real-world characteristics of patients treated with TL, we performed a multicenter retrospective study with patients who were teated with TL since the implementation of the Expanded Access Program (EAP) from 03/2020 until 07/2023. Methods We retrospectively analyzed the outcomes, demographics, data on diagnosis, prior therapies, adverse events (AEs), and treatment after TL of 127 patients with r/r DLBCL treated with TL in Germany and Austria in 18 institutions. OS and PFS are displayed by Kaplan-Meier graphs. Relationships with multiple covariables were calculated by Cox regression. We performed subgroup analyses with prior anti-CD19 therapy, primary refractory disease vs. relapsed disease, IPI, number of prior therapies, treatment after TL, age, and sex. The study was approved by the local Research Ethics Committees. Results Overall, only 37% of our patients met the L-MIND study eligibility criteria; most frequent reasons for ineligibility were more than 3 prior lines of therapy (52%), prior therapy with anti-CD19/IMiDs (19% prior CAR T-cell therapy and Bispecific Antibodies, 7% prior IMiDs), High-Grade-BCL/Follicular Lymphoma Grade 3A/CNS involvement/primary refractory lymphomas/Primary-Mediastinal-BCL/B-ALL (23%), or patients who had lymphoma-specific-therapy within 14 days prior to day 1 dosing with TL (8%). Patient characteristics are stated in Table 1. ORR for the entire cohort (n=127) was 33.1%, CRR 11.8%. Median PFS was 4.7 months (95% CI 6.9 - 11.6), or even 2.9 months (95% CI 2.2 - 3.2) including all causes of death as progression, and median OS 8.9 months (95% CI 5.0 - 11.0) for the whole cohort; see Figure 1. Compared to refractory disease (n=55, 43%), relapsed disease (n=72, 57%) was associated with better ORR (43% vs. 20%, P=0.008). PFS and OS were worse in the primary refractory compared to the relapsed group (median PFS 1.7 vs. 5.3 months, HR 2.79, 95% CI 1.82-4.28, P<0.001; median OS 4.5 vs. 12.9 months, HR 2.72, 95% CI 1.53-4.33, P<0.001). 36% of the patients had a low IPI (0-2, low risk), 55% had a higher IPI (3-5, high risk) at primary diagnosis. ORR (40% vs. 30%) and OS (median OS 9.1 vs. 5.6 months HR 1.76, 95% CI 1.04-2.99) were higher in the lower risk group than in the higher risk group. Fewer prior lines of therapy (1-2 vs. ≥3) were associated with longer median PFS (median 3.3 vs. 1.9 months HR 1.13 per additional line, 95% CI 1.00-1.28, P=0.057) and longer median OS (median 12.5 vs. 5.2 months HR 1.18, 95% CI 1.01-1.37, P=0.039). Median time between the administration of the last prior therapy and TL were 6.4 months. No significant relationships were found for age, sex, and preceding CAR-T treatment. Prior CAR T-cell therapy (24 of 127 patients, post-CAR T-cohort) showed only small differences in ORR (37.5%), PFS (7.9 months with CAR T vs. 12 months without CAR T) or OS (9.2 months with CAR T vs. 12.4 months without CAR T); CRR was higher than in patients not treated with CAR T prior to TL (21% vs. 9.7%). 10 of the analyzed 127 patients received CAR T-cell therapy after TL. Within this subgroup, ORR was 50%. In 2 of these 10 patients TL was used as bridging therapy to CAR T; 1 of 2 patients reached a PR, the other one died before CAR T-cell therapy. The most common hematological AE was neutropenia (67%), the most common non-hematological AEs included infections (31%) and rash and itching (9%). Conclusions We show that the outcomes including ORR, PFS and OS in the real-world setting were lower than observed in the preceding phase II clinical trial (L-MIND). TL seems to be less feasible for patients that show high-risk features; comorbidities, age, dose reductions and the number of pretreatment lines may add to this. The data suggests that TL can still be used after CAR T-cell therapy or as a bridge to CAR T-cell therapy. Our findings on the frequency of observed AEs are consistent with the L-MIND-study.

Interim Results of the Launch Study-a Multicenter, Open-Label Study of Selinexor, Dexamethasone and Chemotherapy Drugs in Relapsed/ Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Background: Exportin 1 (XPO1) is involved in the nuclear export of tumor suppressor proteins (TSPs) and associated with poor prognosis and drug resistance in multiple myeloma. Selinexor is a novel, oral, first-in-class selective inhibitor of XPO1 that was approved by the US FDA for the treatment of patients with relapsed/ refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) based on the STORM study of selinexor (80mg biweekly) in combination with dexamethasone (20mg biweekly) (Xd). Furthermore, in pre-clinical studies, selinexor played a synergistic anti-tumor role with chemotherapy drugs, however clinical data is lacking on such combination treatment. Methods: The LAUNCH study is a multicenter, open-label study (NCT04877275) which enrolled RRMM patients at least one prior treatment. There are two arms in this study, with 25 patients in each arm. XDd Arm: Selinexor 80mg d1,8,15,22, Dexamethasone 40mg d1,8,15,22, and Liposomal Doxorubicin 25-35 mg/m 2 d1; XCd Arm: Selinexor 100mg d1,8,15,22, Dexamethasone 40mg d1,8,15,22, and Cyclophosphamide 300mg/m2 d1,8,15,22. 28d per cycle in both arms. The primary endpoint is objective response rate (ORR), secondary endpoints including clinical benefit rate (CBR), duration of response (DOR) and 1-year progression free survival (PFS) Results: As of July 26, 2023, 44 patients were enrolled (25 in XDd and 19 in XCd), XDd arm has completed recruitment. Of these, 23 patients were male and 21 were female. The median age was 60 years (range: 29-74years). The median time since initial diagnosis was 4.0 years (range: 0.5-15.5years). The median number of prior treatments was 3 (range: 1- 10). There were 13 patients (29.5%) with high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities, 8 patients (18.2%) with extramedullary disease (EMD). Eight patients (18.2%) received prior autologous stem cell transplantation and 7 patients (15.9%) received CAR-T therapy. Forty-two patients (95.5%) were exposed to bortezomib, 35 patients (79.5%) were exposed to lenalidomide, 18 patients (40.9%) exposed to pomalidomide, and 10 patients (22.7%) exposed to daratumumab. The median treatment duration of all patients was 13 weeks (range: 1- 48). Thirteen patients remained on treatment. Based on the 35 patients evaluated for efficacy, the ORR was 48.6% (52.4% in XDd arm, n=21; and 42.9% in XCd arm, n=14) including 1 CR, 1 VGPR and 15 PRs. Three patients achieved MR and 12 patients had stable disease. The most common hematological adverse events (AEs) (All Grades, Grade ≥3) were thrombocytopenia (61.4%, 27.3%), leukopenia (54.5%, 34.1%), and anemia (45.5%, 29.5%). The most common non-hematological AEs (All Grades, Grade ≥3) were fatigue (47.7%, 2.3%) nausea (45.5%, 2.3%) and vomiting (31.8%, 4.5%). Most treatment related adverse events occurred in the first 8 weeks and were alleviated over time. Conclusion: Once weekly selinexor and dexamethasone (Xd) combined with cyclophosphamide or liposome doxorubicin showed encouraging efficacy and manageable safety in treatment for RRMM. This enrollment is still ongoing and data on all participants will be reported in due course.

Efficacy and Safety of Olverembatinib-Based Therapies in Patients with Ph/BCR-ABL1-Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Background Olverembatinib is an oral, third-generation BCR-ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) developed in China that could effectively target wild-type and mutant BCR-ABL1 kinase. It is effective and well-tolerated for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia. However, its efficacy and safety in patients with Ph/BCR-ABL1-Positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia are not entirely clear. This study aims to analyze the efficacy and safety of Olverembatinib-based therapies in patients with Ph/BCR-ABL1-Positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Methods Patients with Ph/BCR-ABL1-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia who received the Olverembatinib-based therapies in our center were included to conduct this retrospective study. Results Totally 33 patients with Ph/BCR-ABL1-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia were included in this study with a median age of 41 years, of whom 21 (63.63%) were female. Among them, 19 subjects who had been previously treated with standard chemotherapy and three newly diagnosed patients received Olverembatinib-based therapies, while 11 patients received Olverembatinib-based therapies after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. After the first course of the Olverembatinib-based regimen, 33 (100%) patients experienced remission (CR/CRi/ Morphologic leukemia-free state), and 22 (66.67%) achieved the negative minimal residual disease (MRD) of BCR-ABL1/ ABL. Followed by the first course of the Olverembatinib-based regimen, five patients with negative MRD were treated with HSCT successfully and 27 received the second course of Olverembatinib-based therapy, of whom 21 (77.78%) acquired negative MRD. For six patients with negative MRD of BCR-ABL1/ ABL1, Olverembatinib-based therapies could remain the negative MRD. These patients with negative MRD will receive allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation after Olverembatinib-based therapy. Olverembatinib-based therapies were generally well tolerated. Common hematologic adverse events included leukopenia, neutropenia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia. Common nonhematologic adverse events included hepatotoxicity, nephrotoxicity, myalgia, arthralgia, rash, and edema, of which most were mild. Conclusion Olverembatinib-based therapies are generally well tolerated and efficacious for patients with Ph/BCR-ABL1-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Consensus on clinical diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in China (2023 edition)

Chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (CIN) is a common hematological adverse events and dose-limiting toxicities of chemotherapy. CIN may lead to dose reduction and delay of chemotherapeutic agents, febrile neutropenia and severe infection, which results in increased treatment cost, reduced efficacy of chemotherapy, and even life-threatening morbidities. Assessment of risk of CIN, early detection of FN and infection, and proper prevention and treatment play a crucial role in reducing the occurrence of CIN-related morbidities, improving patient treatment safety and anticancer efficacy. Based on evidence and expert opinion, the expert committee of Chinese Anti-Cancer Association issued "the consensus on diagnosis and treatment of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in China (2023 edition)", which is an update version of the 2019 edition, aiming to provide reference for the diagnosis and treatment of CIN for Chinese oncologists.

Selinexor-Based Triplet Regimens in Patients With Multiple Myeloma Previously Treated With Anti-CD38 Monoclonal Antibodies

BackgroundThe increasing use of anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies (αCD38 mAbs) for newly diagnosed or early relapsed multiple myeloma (MM), especially in non-transplant eligible patients, may lead to more patients developing αCD38 mAb-refractory disease earlier in the treatment course with fewer treatment options. Patients and methodsWe analyzed the efficacy and safety of selinexor-based triplets (selinexor+dexamethasone [Sd] plus pomalidomide [SPd, n = 23], bortezomib [SVd, n = 16] or carfilzomib (SKd, n = 23]) in a subset of STOMP (NCT02343042) and BOSTON (NCT03110562) study patients treated previously with αCD38 mAbs. ResultsSixty-two patients (median 4 prior therapies, range 1 to 11, 90.3% refractory to αCD38 mAb) were included. Overall response rates (ORR) in the SPd, SVd and SKd cohorts were 52.2%, 56.3%, and 65.2%, respectively. Overall response rate was 47.4% among patients who had MM refractory to the third drug reintroduced in the Sd-based triplet. Median progression-free survival in the SPd, SVd, and SKd cohorts was 8.7, 6.7, and 15.0 months, respectively, and median overall survival was 9.6, 16.9, and 33.0 months, respectively. Median time to discontinuation in the SPd, SVd, and SKd cohorts was 4.4, 5.9, and 10.6 months, respectively. The most common hematological adverse events were thrombocytopenia, anemia, and neutropenia. Nausea, fatigue, and diarrhea were primarily grade 1/2. Adverse events were generally manageable with standard supportive care and dose modifications. ConclusionSelinexor-based regimens may offer effective and well-tolerated therapy to patients with relapsed and/or refractory MM who had disease previously exposed or refractory to αCD38 mAb therapy and could help address the unmet clinical need in these high-risk patients.

Dose escalation results from a first-in-human study of ABBV-400, a novel c-Met–targeting antibody-drug conjugate, in advanced solid tumors.

3015 Background: c-Met overexpression is common in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GEA), and colorectal cancer (CRC). There is a need for effective therapies that target c-Met–overexpressing tumors, as there are currently no approved options available. The antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) ABBV-400 consists of the c-Met–targeting antibody telisotuzumab conjugated to a potent topoisomerase 1 inhibitor (Top1i) payload. ABBV-400 exhibited sustained antitumor activity in patient-derived xenograft models of c-Met–expressing NSCLC, GEA, and CRC. Herein, we present data from the dose escalation of the first-in-human study of ABBV-400 monotherapy. Methods: A phase 1 dose escalation/expansion study of ABBV-400 has been initiated in patients with advanced solid tumors (NCT05029882). Primary objectives are to evaluate safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of ABBV-400, to determine the recommended phase 2 dose, and to assess preliminary efficacy. PK will be characterized for the conjugate, total antibody, and free payload. Adults (≥18 years) with an advanced solid tumor that progressed on standard therapies were enrolled during dose escalation, without restrictions on the basis of c-Met overexpression status. Results: As of January 2023, 47 patients had enrolled in dose escalation with a median follow-up of 6.5 months. Median age was 58 years (range, 34–79), 25 (53%) patients were male, and the most common cancer types were CRC (n=21), NSCLC (n=5), and GEA (n=5). The median number of prior treatment lines was 4 (1–13). Most common hematologic adverse events (AEs) were anemia (66%; grade [G]≥3: 38%), neutropenia (62%; G≥3: 43%), thrombocytopenia (43%; G≥3: 26%), and leukopenia (32%; G≥3: 19%). Nausea (60%, all grade 1–2), fatigue (49%; G≥3: 4%), and vomiting (38%, all grade 1–2) were the most frequent non-hematologic AEs. One patient experienced grade 1 interstitial lung disease. Neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and were dose and exposure dependent. Clinical activity was observed with ABBV-400, with an objective response rate of 24.4% (11/45; 95% CI: 12.9, 39.5). All responses were confirmed partial responses (PR). In addition, 23 patients (50.0%) had stable disease (SD) and 7 (15.2%) had progressive disease. Among patients with CRC, 4/21 (19.0%) had a PR and 13/21 (61.9%) had durable SD, with a disease control rate of 81.0% (95% CI: 58.1, 94.6). Outside of CRC, PRs were observed in patients with NSCLC ( EGFR wildtype and mutant), uterine cancer, and acral melanoma. Conclusions: On the basis of DLTs, a maximum tolerated dose of ABBV-400 was identified. At this dose, safety results appear comparable with other Top1i ADCs. Promising antitumor activity was seen with ABBV-400 across tumor types, justifying further evaluation in the ongoing dose expansion in NSCLC, GEA, and CRC. Clinical trial information: NCT05029882 .

17th International Conference on Malignant Lymphoma, Palazzo dei Congressi, Lugano, Switzerland, 13 - 17 June, 2023.

Introduction: BTK inhibitors (BTKi) monotherapy has introduced the concept of continuous treatment in CLL/SLL until disease progression, leading to several concerns like lack of deep remission, increasing risk of toxic effects and substantial cost. Therefore, time-limited treatment strategies as first line treatment of CLL/SLL were comprehensively explored and BTKi combined with chemoimmunotherapy was one of these options which could induce durable responses in young fit patients. Methods: CLL/SLL patients who were treated with iFCR as initial therapy in the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University were included without any genomic restrictions. Ibrutinib (420 mg daily) was given continuously for 2 years and intravenously rituximab (375 mg/m2 in day 0 of cycle 1; 500 mg/m2 in day 0 of cycle 2–6), fludarabine (25 mg/m2, days 1–3) and cyclophosphamide (250 mg/m2, days 1–3) were administered every 28-day cycle, up to maximal 6 cycles. Patients who achieved complete remission or complete remission with incomplete recovery (CR/CRi) and bone marrow (BM) undetectable MRD (uMRD) 2 years after iFCR initiation were feasible to discontinue ibrutinib maintenance. Results: 34 previously untreated, young fit CLL/SLL patients who received iFCR regimen between January 2019 and March 2021 were included in our cohort. The median age was 55 years (IQR: 48–56). IGHV was unmutated in 21 of 34 (61.8%) patients; complex karyotype was present in 11 of 34 (32.4%) patients; TP53 mutation or del(17p) was detected in 6 of 34 (17.6%) patients. CR/CRi rate and BM uMRD rate was 35.3% (12/34) and 41.2% (14/34) after 3 cycles of iFCR and increased to 55.9% (19/34) 2 months after 6 cycles in both patients who received 3 or 4 and 6 cycles of iFCR. The best CR/CRi and BM uMRD rate were both 73.5% (25/34). With the median follow-up of 33 months (range 7–42 months), the 3-year PFS and OS rate was 80.0% and 95.5% respectively. CR/CRi rate and BM uMRD rate was comparable between patients with IGHV mutated and unmutated status without TP53 aberration, while all patients with TP53 aberration failed to achieve sustainable CR/CRi or BM uMRD. Patients who achieved MRD 10-6 negative post 3 cycles of iFCR sustained remission and discontinued ibrutinib maintenance. The most common hematological adverse events were neutropenia (25/34, 73.5%) and thrombocytopenia (24/34, 70.6%), grade 3–4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 67.6% (23/34) and 35.3% (12/34) patients respectively. The most common non-hematological adverse events were nausea (21/34, 61.8%), fatigue (16/34, 47.1%) and vomiting (15/34, 44.1%). Conclusion: The iFCR regimen could achieve high response rate and uMRD rate as initial treatment for young fit CLL/SLL patient without TP53 aberrations with acceptable tolerability. MRD-guided iFCR courses adjustment in patients who achieved early phase remission could achieved sustainable response and reduced toxicity. Encore Abstract - previously submitted to regional or national meetings (up to <1’000 attendees) The research was funded by: This study was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 82170166, No. 82100207, No. 82170186, No. 81970146, No. 81900167), Translational Research Grant of National Clinical Research Center for Hematology (2020ZKZB01), Six Talent Peaks Project in Jiangsu Province 2019 (Grant No. WSN-001) and Youth Talent support Project in Jiangsu Province Hospital (Grant No. YNRCQN035). Keywords: Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL), Combination Therapies No conflicts of interests pertinent to the abstract.

Efficacy and safety of 40 mg vs 60 mg once weekly selinexor in combination with pomalidomide and dexamethasone in relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM).

e20006 Background: Selinexor (SEL) is an oral exportin 1 inhibitor approved with low-dose dexamethasone ± bortezomib in patients (pts) with previously treated multiple myeloma (MM). Prior studies have reported an overall response rate (ORR) of 28% and a median progression free survival (mPFS) of 3.7 mos to pomalidomide + low dose dexamethasone (Pd) in pts with MM refractory to both bortezomib and lenalidomide. Methods: We analyzed data of pts with RRMM treated with SEL + Pd (SPd) in the Phase 1b/2 STOMP and XPORT-MM-028 clinical trials. SEL 60 mg or 40 mg QW was given with pomalidomide 4 mg QD (days 1-21) and dexamethasone 40 mg weekly in 28-day cycles. Efficacy and safety of the combination were analyzed. Results: As of Sept 6, 2022, 28 pts with a median of 2.0 prior treatment lines (mLOT) and 20 pts with 2.5 mLOT were enrolled in the SPd-40 cohort and SPd-60 cohort, respectively. Among pts treated with SPd-40 and SPd-60, 93% and 75% had MM refractory to a proteasome inhibitor (PI), 75% and 85% had MM refractory to an immunomodulatory drug (IMiD), and 43% and 20% had triple-class refractory MM refractory to an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody (αCD38 mAb), a PI and an IMiD, respectively. Prior exposure to αCD38 mAbs was reported in 57% and 30% of pts in the SPd-40 and SPd-60 cohorts, respectively. Median duration of exposure in the SPd-40 vs SPd-60 cohorts was 28 vs 22 wks, respectively. Higher ORR and rate of pts with ≥very good partial response (VGPR) were observed for SPd-60 vs SPd-40 (ORR: 65% vs 50%; ≥VGPR: 30% vs 25%), but the PFS was numerically longer for SPd-40 vs SPd-60 (mPFS in mos: not reached [95% CI, 6.5-NE] after median follow-up of 1 year vs 9.5 mos [95% CI, 7.6-NE]; 9-mo PFS probability: 0.59 [95% CI, 0.41-0.85] vs 0.52 [95% CI, 0.29-0.94]. Across both doses among patients previously treated with αCD38 mAbs (n = 22), mPFS was 8.9 mos (95% CI, 6.5-NE). For the 27 responders across both doses, median time to response was 1.0 mo (95% CI, 1-2) and median duration of response was 21.8 mos (95% CI, 8.6-NE). Common hematologic treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) included (all grades: SPd-40 vs SPd-60) neutropenia (68% vs 75%, with one case of grade 3 febrile neutropenia in each cohort), anemia (39% vs 65%) and thrombocytopenia (43% vs 45%). No high-grade hemorrhages were observed. Non-hematologic TEAEs were generally transient and reversible, including fatigue (43% vs 75%), nausea (32% vs 70%) and diarrhea (25% vs 35%). Conclusions: The all-oral combination of SEL + Pd in pts with RRMM showed signs of preliminary efficacy and was generally tolerable in these cohorts. Most TEAEs, including nausea, occurred at lower frequency in the 40 mg cohort. Although a higher 60 mg QW SEL dose may be associated with a higher ORR, mPFS correlated with longer duration of treatment and is numerically longer for pts treated with the 40 mg dose, suggesting that clinical benefit is optimized at the lower 40 mg dose. Clinical trial information: NCT02343042 , NCT04414475 .

Preliminary results from the first-in-child phase II trial (ITCC-054/COG-AAML1921) of bosutinib in pediatric patients with newly diagnosed (ND) chronic myeloid leukemia (CML).

10017 Background: Bosutinib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), approved for adults with Philadelphia Chromosome (Ph+) CML; at the standard initial dose of 400 mg/day in ND patients, and 500 mg/day in resistant/intolerant (R/I) patients, administered orally once daily (QD) with food. Compared to the TKIs already approved in pediatrics, bosutinib has a different tolerability profile, and preclinical data suggest that longitudinal growth is potentially less impaired. Study NCT04258943 is an international, open-label, phase I/II trial, sponsored by the Erasmus Medical Center and the Children's Oncology Group, and funded by Pfizer Inc. The phase II arm enrolled ND patients, as well as R/I ones. The latter are not included in this analysis. Methods: ND patients aged 1-18 years with chronic phase CML, without evidence for organ toxicities, were enrolled. Main exclusion criteria included known T315I or V299L BCR-ABL1 mutations, and use of proton pump inhibitors and CYP3A inducers/inhibitors. The primary objectives of the phase II part of the study were to assess the safety and pharmacokinetics (PK) of bosutinib at the recommended phase II dose, which is body surface area adjusted, and consists of 300 mg/m2 QD for ND patients (max 500 mg/day), as determined in the phase I part of the study. Based on regulatory authorities requirements, at least 35 patients have to be enrolled in phase II, with a total of 50-60 patients in phase I and II combined. This allows for pooled AE rates to be estimated with a maximum standard error of 0.071 and 0.065, respectively. Results: On 20/12/2022, 25 ND patients were screened, and 24 were enrolled: 15 males, median age 13 years (range: 5-17). The median follow up was 14 (range: 0.9-31) months. The most common non-hematological adverse events (AEs) were diarrhea (n = 16, Grade (Gr) ≤ 2 = 13), abdominal pain (n = 10, Gr ≤ 2 = 10), and nausea/vomiting (n = 8/8, Gr ≤ 2 = 7/8). Most common hematological AEs included platelet count decrease (n = 11, Gr ≤ 2 = 5), and anemia (n = 10, Gr ≤ 2 = 4). At 6 and 12 months, the cumulative incidence of Major Cytogenetic Response (MCyR) was 85% (95%CI 49%-96%) and 92.5% (95%CI 39%-99%), while for Complete CyR it was 77% (47%-91%) and 88.3% (95%CI 55%-98%), and for Major Molecular Response it was 23% (95%CI 7%-46%) and 30% (95%CI 10%-54%), respectively. Three patients permanently discontinued bosutinib due to intolerance, four due to unsatisfactory response per investigator’s judgment, 17 were still on treatment at time of dataset lock. Conclusions: Bosutinib was well tolerated, despite common grade 1-2 gastrointestinal AEs. The preliminary efficacy seems comparable to published data from other second generation TKIs in children and to ND adult patients treated with bosutinib. Clinical trial information: NCT04258943 .

A study of using epigenetic modulators to enhance response to pembrolizumab (MK-3475) in microsatellite stable advanced colorectal cancer

BackgroundApproximately 95% of advanced colorectal cancer patients (CRC) have mismatch repair MMR-proficient (MMRp) tumors, which do not respond to PD1 blockade alone. Preclinical studies have shown that combined histone deacetylases (HDAC) and/or DNA methyltransferases (DNMT) inhibition can induce susceptibility to immune checkpoint therapy and inhibit tumor growth. We conducted a pilot trial evaluating PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy in combination with DNMT and HDAC inhibitors in MMRp CRC. The study was designed with a biological endpoint of change in immune cell infiltration, to determine the optimal epigenetic combination that optimizes the tumor microenvironment. This trial was designed to test that hypothesis.ResultsFrom January 2016 to November 2018, 27 patients were enrolled with median age of 57 (range 40–69) years. Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 2.79 months and 9.17, respectively. One patient in Arm C achieved a durable partial response by RECIST criteria, lasting for approximately 19 months. The most common treatment-related hematological adverse events in all arms were anemia (62%), lymphopenia (54%) and thrombocytopenia (35%), and non-hematological AEs were anorexia (65%), nausea (77%), and vomiting (73%).ConclusionsThe combination of 5-azacitidine and romidepsin with pembrolizumab was safe and tolerable in patients with advanced MMRp CRC, but with a minimal activity. Further mechanistic investigations are needed to understand epigenetic-induced immunologic shift and to expand the potential applicability of checkpoint inhibitors in this setting.

Combination of gemcitabine, pegaspargase, etoposide, and dexamethasone (GPED) in treatment of advanced extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma.

Combination of gemcitabine, pegaspargase, etoposide, and dexamethasone (GPED) in treatment of advanced extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma.

A phase I study of selinexor combined with weekly carfilzomib and dexamethasone in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.

We performed a phase I study of weekly selinexor, carfilzomib, and dexamethasone (wSKd) in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM). The primary objective was to identify the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of wSKd. Secondary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Prior exposure/refractoriness to carfilzomib was permitted. Thirty patients were enrolled; 26 (87%) had triple-class exposed disease and 6 (20%) received chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy. Dose level 2 (carfilzomib 70 mg/m2 Intravenous [IV] on Days 1, 8, and 15; selinexor 100 mg PO on Days 1, 8, 15, 22; dexamethasone 40 mg on Days 1, 8, 15, 22 of 28-day cycles) was chosen as the MTD, with no DLTs having occurred. The most common hematologic adverse events (AE) were thrombocytopenia (83%), anemia (70%), lymphopenia (50%), and neutropenia (50%). The most common nonhematologic AE were fatigue (70%), nausea (70%), diarrhea (53%), and anorexia (47%). The ORR was 21/30 (70%) overall and 18/23 (78%) at the MTD. At a median follow-up of 12.3 months, the median PFS was 5.3 months and median OS 23.3 months. Responses were similar in carfilzomib naïve and exposed patients. Long-term efficacy of wSKd is modest; wSKd could be employed as a bridging strategy to immunotherapies.

Efficacy and safety of gemcitabine and capecitabine combination for patients with previously treated advanced primary pulmonary lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma: a retrospective single-arm cohort study.

Primary pulmonary lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma (PLELC) is a rare and unique subtype of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Studies reporting on salvage treatment for pretreated PLELC are limited. Positive interactions between gemcitabine (GEM) and capecitabine (CAP) have been demonstrated in preclinical studies. In addition, the clinical benefit of the combination has been reported for other malignancies. However, the efficacy and safety of the combination for pretreated PLELC remain unclear. Therefore, we conducted this retrospective study to examine the activity and safety of gemcitabine plus capecitabine (GEM/CAP) combination for previously treated PLELC. Patients with PLELC at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center who received GEM combined with CAP between May 2013 and January 2021 as the second-line therapy or beyond were retrospectively enrolled. Treatment consisted of intravenous GEM (1,000 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8) and oral CAP (1,000 mg/m2 twice daily on days 1-14) every 3 weeks. Evaluation of response was performed every 2 cycles in accordance with Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. Safety was assessed in accordance with Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. Clinical characteristics were collected from medical records. The survival data were obtained by medical records or telephone. Follow-ups were performed until February 3rd, 2021. A total of 16 patients were enrolled in this study. There were 5, 4, 4, and 3 patients treated with GEM/CAP combination as the second-, third-, fourth-, and fifth-line settings, respectively. There were 8 patients with partial response (PR) (50.00%), 6 with stable disease (SD) (37.50%), 2 with progressive disease (PD) (12.50%), and none with complete response (CR). The objective response rate and disease control rate (DCR) were 50.00% and 87.50%, respectively. The most common hematological and nonhematological adverse events (AEs) at any grade were neutropenia (31.25%) and hand-foot syndrome (43.75%). At a median follow-up of 29.3 months with 95% confidence interval (CI) of 20.3 to 38.3 months, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 9.3 months (95% CI: 6.5-12.1 months). The median overall survival (OS) was 41.5 months (95% CI: 3.1-79.8 months). This retrospective study demonstrated the potential clinical benefit of GEM in combination with CAP for pretreated PLELC. Future multicenter large-scale, prospective studies are warranted.