This study aims to identify and analyze the construction of the position of the Corruption Eradication Commission in the current state administration system, find the weaknesses and position of the Corruption Eradication Commission in the current state administration system, and find answers to the efforts that should be made in the future to ideally reconstruct the position of the Corruption Eradication Commission—based on Pancasila. The approach method used is socio-legal research which is a study that "integrates" doctrinal legal studies with social studies. The results of this study were obtained and it was concluded that: (1) The position of the Corruption Eradication Commission legally is a state institution of the executive family which has implications if the Corruption Eradication Commission can be made the object of the Right of Inquiry by the People's Representative Council of the Republic of Indonesia and the position of the Supervisory Board which is one of its powers increasingly giving a new color, which includes the permit process for Wiretapping, searches, and confiscation, which is mandatory for the Corruption Eradication Commission to the Supervisory Board which will have implications for the problem of intervention, certain political interests towards the Corruption Eradication Commission that enter through the Supervisory Board. (2) Reconstruction of the ideal position of the Corruption Eradication Commission in a constitutional system based on Pancasila values of justice is the Corruption Eradication Commission as a unique agency carrying out the functions of judicial power in the field of prevention and prosecution of criminal acts of corruption that are free, independent and may not receive interference from the executive or legislature in carrying out its position. By the values of Pancasila, namely social justice for all Indonesian people, where the relevance is that the Corruption Eradication Commission's power as a law enforcer must be positioned by efforts to achieve justice with the support of the Corruption Eradication Commission's ideal position in the constitutional system. To strengthen the reconstruction of values, the legal reconstruction should ideally be carried out by amending several articles, namely Article 3, Article 21, Article 30, and Article 37B paragraph 1 b, in Law Number 19 of 2019 concerning the Corruption Eradication Commission. So that the position of the Corruption Eradication Commission is no longer under the auspices of the executive but at the judiciary which is independent and independent.