Healthcare Commission Research Articles

Evaluating artificial intelligence-driven stress echocardiography analysis system (EASE study): A mixed method study

IntroductionThe use and value of artificial intelligence (AI)-driven tools and techniques are under investigation in detecting coronary artery disease (CAD). EchoGo Pro is a patented AI-driven stress echocardiography analysis system...

Estimating natural history of a treatment-eligible type 2 diabetes mellitus population in Scotland using linked primary and secondary care data: Scottish Diabetes Research Network - National Diabetes Dataset

Healthcare commissioners and those making reimbursement decisions require data on the “natural history” of diseases to estimate quantities such as life expectancy and quality of life. However, such data are commonly acquired from unrepresentative sources like trial placebo arms or case series. We used Scottish Diabetes Research Network-National Diabetes Dataset to characterise life expectancy for people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Data from >99% of people with diabetes in Scotland are available from primary and secondary care (including from clinical investigations) and can be linked to hospital admission and death records for research purposes. As part of an MRC-funded (MR/T017112/1) systematic review and modelling study (PROSPERO registration CRD42020184174) building on work funded by the Chief Scientific Office for Scotland (CSO HIPS_17_26), we used these linked data to define a treatment-eligible population for three drug classes — SGLT-2 inhibitors, GLP-1 agonists, and DPP-4 inhibitors. Fitting a Gompertz model, we estimated life expectancy for this ‘treatment-eligible’ group. The treatment-eligible population, compared to the entire Scottish T2DM population, was younger (63.8 (12.1) vs. 66.7 (12.7) year-old), with larger proportions of men (60.6% vs. 56.2%), higher HbA1c levels (67.4 (13.1) vs. 60.2 (15.1) mmol/L), larger proportions prescribed metformin (69.2% vs 55.2%) and higher life expectancy at age 65 (in women 21 vs 19 years and in men 20 vs 18 years). Using linked data to define and characterise treatment-eligible populations is feasible and may impact decision models. These findings will be useful to those making resourcing decisions and future economic analyses.

Debt maturity structure and corporate risk: an empirical study based on pandemic shock in China

We collected data on the duration of outbreaks in Chinese cities from the websites of National, Provincial, and Municipal Healthcare Commissions as our primary source. Our aim is to investigate the impact of debt maturity structure on COVID-19 shocks. We conducted statistical analyses based on different levels of debt maturity and the severity of the shocks. Subsequently, we empirically tested the mitigating effect of debt maturity structure on pandemic shocks using a fixed-effects model. Our findings reveal that pandemic shocks heighten firms’ business risk. However, extending the debt maturity structure significantly alleviates the impact of these shocks. Robust benchmark results were obtained through instrumental tests employing instrumental variables, PSM-DID, and placebo methods. Mechanism tests demonstrate that extending debt maturity helps in mitigating maturity mismatches, reducing debt financing costs, and alleviating financing constraints. Further analysis indicates that the pandemic mitigating effect of debt maturity structure is more pronounced among firms with lower degrees of marketization and governance, particularly among private firms. Our study contributes to the micro-level understanding of the economic repercussions of major pandemic disasters and enriches research on firm risk from the standpoint of capital structure.

Expert recommendations for the prevention of common respiratory viral infections in neonates

Neonates, particularly preterm infants, are a susceptible population to respiratory viral infections. Currently, aside from influenza, there are no antiviral medications specifically approved for the treatment of respiratory viral infections in neonates; therefore, prevention of these viral infections is particularly crucial for neonates. The Neonatal HealthCare Committee of Chinese Maternal and Child Health Association, based on domestic and international clinical evidence and combined with clinical practice experience, and after thorough discussion by relevant experts, has developed eight expert recommendations. These include preventive strategies against influenza virus, respiratory syncytial virus, and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infections, intended for reference in clinical practice.

Reflections of nurses and primary healthcare managers on integrating hospital at home into public primary healthcare services: a Norwegian focus group study

Background Hospital at home (HaH) is an innovative approach to healthcare delivery that brings specialized services to patients’ homes. HaH services are typically available in urban areas where hospitals can easily reach nearby patients. An integrated care model that utilizes the public primary healthcare system may extend HaH services to include patients residing further away from hospitals. However, there is limited evidence of primary healthcare employees’ views on integrating HaH care into primary healthcare services. This study aimed to explore the reflections of primary healthcare employees on integrating HaH care into primary healthcare services. Methods Ten focus group interviews were conducted with homecare nurses and managers of primary healthcare services in five municipalities in Mid-Norway. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to analyze the data. Results The analysis resulted in three key themes regarding the integration of HaH care into primary healthcare. Participants discussed how they capture the distinctiveness of HaH care within the primary healthcare landscape. Moreover, they identified that the introduction of HaH care reveals opportunities to address challenges. Lastly, the study uncovered a strong primary healthcare commitment and a sense of professional pride among the participants. This resilience and dedication among primary healthcare employees appeared as an incentive to make the integration of HaH work. Conclusions This study offers valuable insights into integrating HaH into primary healthcare services, highlighting opportunities to address challenges. The resilience and dedication of primary healthcare employees underscore their commitment to adapting to and thriving with HaH care. To establish a sustainable HaH care model, it is important to address geographical limitations, consider the strain on providers, maintain robust relationships, enhance funding, and formalize decision-making processes.

Discharge Perfection: Assessing Documentation Quality at Mardan Medical Complex, Pakistan (2024 Audit Debut).

Background Patient discharge summaries not only play a vital role in ensuring continuity of care and patient safety but also serve as a communication tool between the primary and tertiary care settings. However, despite their paramount importance, most discharge summaries are either inaccurate or miss essential clinical information, posing considerable danger to patients. This clinical audit assesses the quality of discharge summaries at Mardan Medical Complex, Mardan, Pakistan, to identify areas for improvement. Aim The aim of this study is to assess the discharge summaries of patients at Mardan Medical Complex in Mardan, Pakistan, with a focus on their completeness, accuracy, and timeliness. Methods A cross-sectional, observational, and retrospective study was carried out in the Medical A ward of Mardan Medical Complex, Mardan, Pakistan, from September 2023 to October 2023. Out of the 897 discharge slips, a sample size of 105 participants was determined using Epi Info software. A systematic random sampling technique was used. Data was extracted from the hospital management information system and evaluated using a clinical audit tool based on standard guidelines from the Royal College of Physicians, Islamabad Healthcare Regulatory Authority, and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Health Care Commission. To analyze the data, descriptive statistics were applied. Results The clinical audit revealed significant deficiencies in discharge summaries. Important patient demographics, such as contact details and safety alerts, were completely absent in 100% of the cases, and 48% of the summaries lacked the father's name. Admission details were similarly inadequate, with nearly all summaries missing critical information like admission time and reasons for admission. Clinical summaries and procedural details were absent in 73% and 87% of the cases, respectively. Discharge planning also showed major gaps, as special instructions according to the primary diagnosis and discharge destination were frequently neglected. Follow-up visits were recommended in only 71% of cases. Additionally, there were significant errors in in-home medication prescriptions, with 61% missing medication doses, 28% missing the route of administration, and 20% lacking the duration of treatment. Conclusions This clinical audit identified critical areas for improvement by revealing significant errors in the quality of discharge summaries at Mardan Medical Complex. It is recommended that standardized discharge slip templates be implemented, healthcare workers receive proper training, and thorough monitoring be conducted before patients are discharged. These measures aim to enhance the standard of documentation. Additionally, regular future clinical audits are essential for tracking the impact of these interventions and ensuring patient safety and continuity of care.

Factors leading to surgical site infection (SSI); a 6 years analysis of general surgical cases in a newly developed teaching hospital.

Objective: To determine the major factors leading to surgical site infection in elective surgeries. Study Design: Retrospective Cross Sectional study. Setting: Department of Surgery, Government Teaching Hospital Shahdara, Lahore. Period: January 2016 to December 2021. Methods: The cases of surgical site infections were collected from well-organized data according to health care commission’s format of recording data in surgical site infection Register. Emergency patients were excluded. Each infected case was thoroughly investigated according to Performa and presented in meeting of infection control committee. Demographics were recorded and the factors were determined in individual case. Frequency and percentages of infected cases and main factors in all cases were analyzed by SPSS version 24. Results: We had 61 cases of SSI out of 2962 cases operated during the study period with calculated rate of 2.06%. Seventy two percent cases had age more than 40 years. 39(63.93%) were female and 22(36/07) were male. Mean age was 43.02 years with standard deviation of ± 8.98. 72% of infected cases. BMI in infected cases was 29.56 mean and Standard deviation ± 2.74 and 27.29 in non-infected cases (significant). Diabetes and Rank of surgeon had significant difference with increased infection in resident level. Smoking and gender of patients had no statistically significant impact. Conclusion: High Body mass index, diabetes, longer duration of procedure, rank of surgeon and use of mesh are the leading factors causing surgical site infection. Smoking, age and gender had no significant effect on SSI.

Improving influenza vaccine uptake in clinical risk groups: patient, provider and commissioner perspectives on the acceptability and feasibility of expanding delivery pathways in England

BackgroundPeople under the age of 65 in clinical risk groups are at increased risk of severe complications and death from influenza. In England, influenza vaccine coverage rates in this cohort...

Proactive patient safety: enhancing hospital readiness through simulation-based clinical systems testing and healthcare failure mode and effect analysis

BackgroundRecognizing and identifying latent safety threats (LSTs) before patient care commences is crucial, aiding leaders in ensuring hospital readiness and extending its impact beyond patient safety alone. This study evaluated the effectiveness of a combination of Simulation-based Clinical Systems Testing (SbCST) with Healthcare Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (HFMEA) with regard to mitigating LSTs within a newly constructed hospital.MethodsThree phases of the combined SbCST and HFMEA approach were implemented across all hospital settings. The scenarios tested system functionalities, team responses, and resource availability. The threats thus identified were categorized into system-related issues, human issues, and resource issues, after which they were prioritized and addressed using mitigation strategies. Reassessment confirmed the effectiveness of these strategies before hospital commissioning.ResultsMore than 76% of the LSTs were mitigated through the combined approach. System-related issues, such as nonfunctional communication devices and faulty elevators, were addressed by leadership. Human issues such as miscommunication and nonadherence to hospital policy led to improvements in interprofessional communication and teamwork. Resource issues, including missing equipment and risks of oxygen explosion, were addressed through procurement, maintenance, and staff training for equipment preparation.ConclusionThe SbCST and HFMEA were highly effective with regard to proactively identifying and mitigating LSTs across all aspects of hospital preparedness. This systematic and comprehensive approach offers a valuable tool for enhancing patient safety in new healthcare facilities, thereby potentially setting a new standard for proactive hazard identification and risk management in the context of healthcare construction and commissioning.

The Journey Toward Health Care Equity: Accredited Hospitals’ Alignment with Joint Commission Health Care Equity Standards Preimplementation

The Journey Toward Health Care Equity: Accredited Hospitals’ Alignment with Joint Commission Health Care Equity Standards Preimplementation

Tobacco use and risk of acute stroke in 32 countries in the INTERSTROKE study: a case–control study

Smoking is a major risk factor for the global burden of stroke. We have previously reported a global population attributable risk (PAR) of stroke of 12.4% associated with current smoking. In this study we aimed to explore the association of current tobacco use with different types of tobacco exposure and environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) exposure on the risk of stroke and stroke subtypes, and by regions and country income levels. The INTERSTROKE study is a case-control study of acute first stroke and was undertaken with 13,462 stroke cases and 13,488 controls recruited between January 11, 2007 and August 8, 2015 in 32 countries worldwide. Association of risk of tobacco use and ETS exposure were analysed with overall stroke, ischemic and intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), and with TOAST etiological stroke subtypes (large vessel, small vessel, cardioembolism, and undetermined). Current smoking was associated with an increased risk of all stroke (odds ratio [OR] 1.64, 95% CI 1.46-1.84), and had a stronger association with ischemic stroke (OR 1.85, 95% CI 1.61-2.11) than ICH (OR 1.19 95% CI 1.00-1.41). The OR and PAR of stroke among current smokers varied significantly between regions and income levels with high income countries (HIC) having the highest odds (OR 3.02 95% CI 2.24-4.10) and PAR (18.6%, 15.1-22.8%). Among etiological subtypes of ischemic stroke, the strongest association of current smoking was seen for large vessel stroke (OR 2.16, 95% CI 1.63-2.87) and undetermined cause (OR 1.97, 95% CI 1.55-2.50). Both filtered (OR 1.73, 95% CI 1.50-1.99) and non-filtered (OR 2.59, 95% CI 1.79-3.77) cigarettes were associated with stroke risk. ETS exposure increased the risk of stroke in a dose-dependent manner, exposure for more than 10h per week increased risk for all stroke (OR 1.95, 95% CI 1.69-2.27), ischemic stroke (OR 1.89, 95% CI 1.59-2.24) and ICH (OR 2.00, 95% CI 1.60-2.50). There are significant variations in the magnitude of risk and PAR of stroke according to the types of tobacco used, active and ETS exposure, and countries with different income levels. Specific strategies to discourage tobacco use by any form and to build a smoke free environment should be implemented to ease the global burden of stroke. The Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada, Canadian Stroke Network, Swedish Research Council, Swedish Heart and Lung Foundation, The Health & Medical Care Committee of the Regional Executive Board, Region Västra Götaland, and through unrestricted grants from several pharmaceutical companies with major contributions from Astra Zeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim (Canada), Pfizer (Canada), MERCK, Sharp and Dohme, Swedish Heart and Lung Foundation, UK Chest, and UK Heart and Stroke.

Healthcare professional and commissioners' perspectives on the factors facilitating and hindering the implementation of digital tools for self-management of long-term conditions within UK healthcare pathways.

Physical activity is important in the self-management of long-term conditions (LTCs). However, implementing physical activity into clinical practice is challenging, due to complex barriers including access to programmes, time pressures, and transport costs, for people with comorbidities, managing multiple responsibilities. Various digital tools exist to overcome these barriers and support wide-scale implementation to help people stay physically active. We explored the experiences, needs and preferences of healthcare professionals and commissioners, regarding the use of digital tools to support people with LTCs to self-manage using physical activity. This included barriers and facilitators to implementing digital tools to support people with LTCs in NHS settings. Semi-structured interviews were conducted (April 2021 to January 2022) in Wessex, southern England, UK. Purposive sampling was used to recruit general practitioners and healthcare professionals, and convenience sampling to recruit commissioners (n = 15). Transcripts were coded to develop conceptual themes allowing comparisons between and among perspectives, with the Normalisation Process Theory (NPT)'s four constructs used to aid interpretation. Results showed that most digital tools supporting physical activity for LTCs, are not well implemented clinically. Current digital tools were seen to lack condition-specificity, usability/acceptability evidence-base, and voluntary sector involvement (i.e., NPT: coherence or 'making sense'). Healthcare professionals and commissioners were unlikely to engage with use of digital tools unless they were integrated into health service IT systems and professional networks (i.e., NPT: cognitive participation), or adaptable to the digital literacy levels of service users and staff (i.e., NPT: collective action-needs for implementation). In practice, this meant being technically, easy to use and culturally accessible (i.e., NPT: collective action-promoting healthcare work). COVID-19 changed professional attitudes towards digital tools, in that they saw them being viable, feasible and critical options in a way they had not done before the pandemic. Implementation was also influenced by endorsement and trustworthiness enhancing the perception of them as secure and evidence-based (i.e., NPT: reflective monitoring). Our findings highlight that consideration must be given to ensuring that digital tools are accessible to both healthcare professionals and patients, have usability/acceptability, and are adaptable to specific LTCs. To promote clinical engagement, digital tools must be evidence-based, endorsed by professional networks, and integrated into existing health systems. Digital literacy of patients and professionals is also crucial for cross-service implementation.

MMR vaccines should be delivered through community pharmacy, says health and social care committee chair

MMR vaccines should be delivered through community pharmacy, says health and social care committee chair

Reimagined day care for older people - supporting older people and caregivers to age in place.

There is a widespread view amongst policy makers, as well as some senior managers and commissioners in local authorities, that collective forms of day care for older people are outdated and not aligned with wider policy ambitions. However, there is also growing recognition, amongst advocacy organisations such as Carers UK and Age UK, that many older people and their caregivers would welcome the opportunity to attend collective day care services, as well as growing interest amongst providers of services and older people themselves about the need to transform provision. 
 As health and social care commissioners in England develop Integrated Care Systems, there is potential for reimagined day care for older people to play an important role in delivering person-centred, preventative and place-based care for older people and their caregivers, including enabling older people to live at home for longer as well as addressing wellbeing, loneliness and social isolation. 
 The presentation will outline findings from case studies visited as part of a National Institute for Health Research, School for Social Care Research study exploring the experiences of and aspirations for collective day care in England, from the perspectives of older people, their carers, those who work in or manage services, as well as local stakeholders from the health and care system. For this research, day care is defined as community building-based services that provide care and/or health related services and/or clubs and activities specifically for older people (65+) with care and support needs. 
 Case studies visited included a range of models of day care for older people including day centres for people living with dementia, small-scale day care based in a hosts home, to large-scale preventative provision for older people. The study explored: peoples experiences of attending; impact on wellbeing and health of older people and their caregivers; what an ideal model of day care would look like; experiences of day care through the COVID-19 pandemic; and relationships with local health and community partners. 
 Our findings highlight the role day care can play in providing opportunities for connection and friendship for older people who attend, supporting caregivers to sustain their caring role, and supporting physical and mental wellbeing and health of older people and their caregivers. Highlighting the importance of personal connections, joy and purposeful activity, design of the physical space and connections with local place, the presentation will discuss innovations in practice that may support a ‘reimagining of day care’, ensuring it meets the aspirations of older people and their caregivers, as well as supporting wider policy ambitions including how social care services can contribute to the wider preventative health agenda. 

Commissioning [Integrated] Care in England: An Analysis of the Current Decision Context

Background: The emergence of Integrated Care Systems (ICSs) across England poses an additional challenge and responsibility for local commissioners to accelerate the implementation of integrated care programmes and improve the overall efficiency across the system. To do this, ICS healthcare commissioners could learn from the experience of the former local commissioning structures and identify areas of improvement in the commissioning process. 
 Aim & Audience: This study describes the investment decision process in integrated care amid the transition toward ICSs, highlights challenges, and provides recommendations to inform ICSs in their healthcare commissioning role. It is expected that this study encourages an open discussion within the emerging ICSs on the barriers and enablers of the local commissioning of integrated care. We also believe that findings of this study are likely to be of international interest as countries are gradually moving towards integrated care, and local purchasers of healthcare from high-income economies are likely to encounter similar challenges as the ones faced by local commissioners in England.
 Methods: We conducted twenty-six semi-structured interviews with local commissioners and other relevant stakeholders in South East England in 2021. Interviews were supplemented with existing evidence from the literature.
 Results: England’s local healthcare commissioning has made the transition towards a new organisational architecture, with some integrated care programmes running, and a dual top-down and bottom-up prioritisation process in place. The commissioning and consequent development of integrated care programmes have been hindered by various barriers, including difficulties in accessing and using information, operational challenges, and resource constraints. Investment decisions have mainly been driven by national directives and budget considerations, with a mixture of subjective and objective approaches. This contrasts with what seems to be a set of desirable prioritisation criteria, with the triple aim framework at the front. A systematic and data-driven framework could replace this ad-hoc prioritisation of integrated care and contribute to a more rational and transparent commissioning process. To develop such a framework, a good reference point could be the health technology assessment framework established at national level to guide priority-setting decisions. 
 Conclusion & next-steps: The local healthcare commissioning structures in England are complex, the evidence available is rich, and integrated care is undoubtedly the goal to achieve. However, the multiple barriers that commissioners face hinder the development of integrated care programmes and limit the local use of evidence in healthcare decision-making. The emerging ICSs seem to open an opportunity for local commissioners to strengthen the commissioning process of integrated care with evidence-based priority-setting approaches similar to the well-established health technology assessment framework at the national level. To support this, we are developing a data-driven framework to monitor and assess ‘integrated care programmes’. 

A Facility-Level Analysis of Nursing Home Compare's Five-Star Rating and Maryland's Family Satisfaction with Care Survey.

Nursing facilities care for individuals with cognitive and/or physical disabilities. Poor quality is associated with greater disease and mortality. Quality comprises many factors and different stakeholders value different factors. This study aimed to compare two care quality frameworks, one based on observable factors and one on family satisfaction. We merged publicly available 2021 Maryland nursing facility data. The Maryland Health Care Commission surveys long-term care residents' family satisfaction across seven domains. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services' (CMS) 5-star ratings aggregate inspections, staffing, and quality measures. We used univariate and bivariate statistics to compare the frameworks. The data set included 220 facilities and 4,610 survey respondents. The average facility rating was 7.70/10 and overall 77% of respondents would recommend the facility. Eighty-six percent of respondents from 5-star facilities, 79% from 4-star facilities, and 76% from 3-star facilities would recommend the facility compared to 65% from 1-star facilities (p < .001, p < .01, and p < .05, respectively). Four or 5-star facilities received significantly higher ratings (8.33, p < .001; 7.75, p < .05, respectively) than 1-star facilities (7.07). Our results corroborated earlier findings of strong associations between CMS ratings and satisfaction at the extremes of the 5-star system. These associations are inconsistent across family-reported domains. This suggests overlap between the frameworks. CMS ratings address care quality; family satisfaction measures quality of life and care quality. High satisfaction is associated with high care quality and quality of life; lower satisfaction is associated with lower care quality.

Healthcare commissioners' experience with antibiotic resistance during the COVID-19 pandemic in Saudi Arabia: a qualitative study.

The occurrence of antibiotic resistance (AR) has become a critical issue during the Novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. This study explores the experiences of healthcare commissioners with AR during the COVID-19 pandemic, identifies challenges, and provides recommendations for combating AR during pandemics. This qualitative study was multi-centered and used a phenomenological approach. Semi-structured interviews were conducted between December 2022 and January 2023 among 11 health commissioners using video calls. Seven themes emerged from the data, including knowledge of AR and its consequences, the antibiotic prescription system, the future of AR and potential contributory factors, the impact of COVID-19 on AR and their relationship, the experience of AR during the COVID-19 pandemic in healthcare facilities, barriers that prevent the misuse of antibiotics during pandemics, and recommendations regarding antibiotic resistance during pandemics. The findings of this study could be used to inform policy and practice for government healthcare workers (HCWs) and the public. Furthermore, this study identified the main challenges of AR during the pandemic, and the recommendations of health commissioners were provided accordingly. Such recommendations could be beneficial on a national and international scale to reduce the impact of future pandemics on AR. COVID-19: Novel coronavirus disease 2019; AR: Antibiotic Resistance; IPC: Infection prevention and control; MDRO: multi-drug resistant organism; ASP: Antimicrobial Stewardship Program; HCW: Healthcare worker; KSA: Kingdom of Saudi Arabia; WHO: World Health Organization; MOH: Ministry of Health; MOEWA: Ministry of Environment, Water, and Agriculture; AMR: Antimicrobial Resistance; PHCC: Primary Healthcare Center.

Anaesthesia provision challenges in public hospitals of Pakistan’s Punjab province: a qualitative study of expert perspectives

ObjectivesAnaesthesia delivery in Pakistan remains limited to conventional intraoperative procedures, with research showing ongoing challenges in quality and resourcing. We aimed to identify systemic challenges in the delivery of the...

AHP P01 A Survey To Explore The Use Of Nutritional Outcome Measures In Clinical Practice By Dietitians In Oesophago-Gastric Cancer Care In The British Isles

Abstract Background Dietitians in clinical practice face the challenge of providing high quality care whilst demonstrating clinical effectiveness and continuous improvement. Assessing the effectiveness of dietetic intervention is vital in ensuring the provision of clinically effective dietetic services. Nutritional outcome measures are key in identifying the impact of dietetic interventions; enabling dietitians to objectively measure the effectiveness of their care as well as providing patients, other health care professionals and commissioners with data around the value of care provision. Currently there are no specific nutritional outcomes associated with oesophago-gastric cancer care in the UK. Methods A survey was disseminated through direct personal emails to 93 Dietitians known to be working in UGI, a list derived from NOGCA audit sites of 2021, with the aim of assessing the current use of nutritional outcome measures by Dietitians working in oesophago-gastric cancer acute care in the British Isles. Further promotion was directed through a UGI Dietitians Forum and through social media posts. A YouTube video was produced and distributed alongside the survey, with the aim of providing education around identifying nutritional outcomes. The video also aimed to connect personally with people, with a visual presentation from the researcher. Results 54 responses represented the entire patient journey. Whilst 72% of respondents reported identifying and documenting dietetic outcomes, the quality of these assessments was low, mainly focusing on weight, weight changes and hand grip strength. Other common themes related to nutritional intake, quality of life and symptom impact. Less common outcomes measured included standardised nutritional assessment (PG-SGA), gastro-intestinal symptom evaluation, optimised prehabilitation, biochemical parameters and patient experience. There was little standardisation in how outcomes are used and when they were taken. There is no national database available to collate OG nutritional outcome data, representing a missed opportunity to support national benchmarking. Conclusions This study has presented not only the inconsistencies in nutritional outcome data collection (definition, timing and tools) and the need for standardisation of outcomes use in this speciality, it has also demonstrated the challenges around the promotion of outcomes measures and application/roll out into clinical practice. Novel ways of obtaining and evaluating nutritional outcomes will need to be considered. This will form the basis of a further research study, exploring barriers to completion of nutritional outcomes.

Opportunistic identification of atrial fibrillation during unscheduled contact with emergency ambulance services in England: a qualitative exploration

Abstract Background Atrial fibrillation (AF) is an important risk factor for stroke which commonly affects people attended by Emergency Medical Services (EMS). There may be an opportunity for. EMS clinicians to find new incidental cases of AF suitable for oral anticoagulation (OAC) amongst the population who do not require conveyance to hospital following urgent ambulance review. Purpose This study explored whether it was acceptable to propose a formal pathway for identification and subsequent referral of non-conveyed EMS patients with incidental AF to their general practitioner (GP) for consideration of OAC prescription. The perspectives of patients, paramedics, and field experts were included. Methods This qualitative study included four online focus groups involving 18 members of the public and one-to-one online interviews in England with 11 health care and service providers (6 paramedics, 5 field experts providing multiple expertise in cardiology, general practice, public health, academic research, healthcare policy, and primary care commissioning) between June and September 2022. A semi-structured topic guide was used, with purposive sampling to maximise the diversity of perspective and experience in all participant groups. Data were audio-recorded, transcribed anonymously and analysed thematically. Results All participant groups supported formalising the opportunistic detection of AF during EMS review, but each had concerns and caveats. Of paramount concern to all groups was that any change in practice must not create delays in the emergency response system since incidental AF is non-urgent and other community pathways are in place for detection and management. Public participants were also concerned about how the diagnosis would be communicated to the patient, and opinion was split between whether this should be ‘on the scene’ or in a subsequent GP appointment. Paramedics reported that they frequently identify incidental AF, but that there is variation in practice regarding whether (and how) this is communicated to the GP. There was a concern that the finding of AF was not easily visible within the existing EMS report and may be missed. Paramedics also focussed on safety-netting of patients not being conveyed to hospital and of a need for an ‘active’ reporting process to ensure that the finding of AF was acted upon. In general, field experts felt that a formal pathway would be useful but relatively low impact, and favoured a simple intervention that did not overly complicate existing AF pathways. Conclusions There is support amongst the public and professionals for the development of a formal pathway to ensure ongoing follow-up and care for people with AF incidentally detected in the community by EMS. This novel case finding opportunity has the potential to improve AF detection, oral anticoagulation rates, and reduce the risk of stroke.